FIDE Trainers Surveys 2018 06 12 Miguel Illescas Backward pawn on c7

background image

FIDE Surveys – Miguel Illescas

1

Miguel Illescas:

Backward pawn on c7

When white takes c4xd5 and black
recaptures with e6xd5 in the queens gambit,
we reach the well known Karlsbad structure,
where black usually plays c7–c6. But
sometimes, black delays or is not able to
play c6, and white manages to advance his b
pawn to b5, leaving the c7 pawn backwards.
In this article we will have a look at this type
of positions, which usually are in white's
favour. Let's start with a fantastic game by
Magnus Carlsen, where the World champion
shows a deep understanding of this type of
position.

Carlsen : Aronian
(2015)

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.Nc3 Bb4 5.cd5
ed5 6.Bg5 h6 7.Bf6 Qf6 8.Qa4

XIIIIIIIIY
9rsnl+k+-tr0
9zppzp-+pzp-0
9-+-+-wq-zp0
9+-+p+-+-0
9Qvl-zP-+-+0
9+-sN-+N+-0
9PzP-+PzPPzP0
9tR-+-mKL+R0
xiiiiiiiiy

With this check black is forced to develop
the knight to c6, a square where black would
like to place the c7 pawn, in order to
neutralize white's activity on the c line and
not less important, to give proper support to
the central pawn on d5.
8...Nc6 9.e3 0–0 10.Be2
If 10.Bd3 Bg4 is annoying.
10...Be6 11.0–0

Open ing phase is over and both sides need
to imagine a long term plan.
11...a6
A typical move, to control b5, thus the dark
squares bishop may land on d6 without
being annoyed by the white's knight.
12.Rfc1
Bringing this rook, White shows his
intention to concentrate his efforts on the
queenside.
12...Bd6 13.Qd1

XIIIIIIIIY
9r+-+-trk+0
9+pzp-+pzp-0
9p+nvllwq-zp0
9+-+p+-+-0
9-+-zP-+-+0
9+-sN-zPN+-0
9PzP-+LzPPzP0
9tR-tRQ+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

The job has been done and the queen
retreats, allowing the maneouvre Nc3–a4–
c5.
13.Qb3?! Ne7, when the pawn b7 is tabu and
the white queen is badly placed.
13...Ne7
A standard move, allowing black to play c6
if needed, and looking for better prospects
for the knight. I like howewer the way black
played in L. Portisch : Sosonko (Wijk aan
Zee 1975): 13...Rae8!? 14.Na4 Nd8! 15.Nc5
Bc8! and black hold to a draw in a long
battle.
14.a3!?
Simple chess by Magnus, who prepares b2–
b4. A typical plan was seen in Taimanov :
Kotov (Zürich 1953): 14.Na4 b6 15.Nc3
Rfd8 16.Qf1 c6 17.Na4 Rdb8 18.Rc3 a5
19.Rac1 Bd7 20.a3 Ng6 21.Bd3 Qe6 22.Qd1
Bc7 23.Qc2 Ne7 24.Re1 f5 25.b4 ab4 26.ab4
Bd6 27.Rb1 b5? 28.Nc5 Bc5 29.Rc5 and

background image

FIDE Surveys – Miguel Illescas

2

white got the advantage and won the game
20 moves later.
14...Rfd8
I don't like this move, since I have the
feeling that this rook belongs to e8.
The game Jobava : Efimenko (Rijeka 2010),
continued with a more active play by black,
which deserves attention. 14...c5!? 15.dc5
Bc5 16.Na4 (16.Nd5 Bd5 17.Rc5 Qb2; 16.e4
Ba7! 17.ed5 Rfd8 and black is fine) 16...Ba7
17.b4 d4 18.Nd4 Rad8 19.Qf1 Bd4 20.ed4
Nf5 21.Nc5 and a draw was agreed.
15.b4
Black lost the battle on the queenside and
needs to create play on the other flank.
15...Nc8?!
Too optimistic. Maybe Aronian thought he
could jump to c4, but Magnus will not allow
it. More logical looks 15...Ng6 16.Na4 b6
17.Nb2 h5 18.Nd3 h4, with some
counterplay.
16.Na4 b6
Black cannot allow the enemy knight to
jump to c5, but now c6 and a6 become
vulnerable.
17.Nb2! Ne7
It si clear that black's plan has failed.
18.Nd3 Ng6

XIIIIIIIIY
9r+-tr-+k+0
9+-zp-+pzp-0
9pzp-vllwqnzp0
9+-+p+-+-0
9-zP-zP-+-+0
9zP-+NzPN+-0
9-+-+LzPPzP0
9tR-tRQ+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

19.a4!
Excellent positional chess. The threat is a4–
a5, and black would be forced to close with
b6–b5, leaving a6 too weak.
19...a5 20.b5

We reach a standard position. The weakness
on c7 is definetely fixed, and the pawn on d5
will need permanent piece support.
20...Re8 21.Rc3
A typical idea: white doubles on the c line
increasing the pressure. Black will need to
keep the bishop alive on d6 at all cost, and
the exchange sacrifice on c7 will have to be
watched all the time.
21...Bf5 22.Rac1
White may jump to e5 at any moment.
22...Rad8

XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-trr+k+0
9+-zp-+pzp-0
9-zp-vl-wqnzp0
9zpP+p+l+-0
9P+-zP-+-+0
9+-tRNzPN+-0
9-+-+LzPPzP0
9+-tRQ+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

Magnus pointed after the game that he
expected 22...Re7, with idea of 23...Rae8.
23.Nd2!
It was not as precise to start with 23.g3 since
after 23...Bg4! 24.Nd2? black has 24...Be2
25.Qe2 Qd4!
23...Rd7 24.g3
Killing the activity of the black pieces.]
24...Nf8 25.Bg4!
Standard play: white eliminates the enemy
pair of bishops, and makes even weaker c6
and d5.
25...Nh7
25...Ne6 covering c7 was another idea.
26.Bf5 Qf5

background image

FIDE Surveys – Miguel Illescas

3

XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+r+k+0
9+-zpr+pzpn0
9-zp-vl-+-zp0
9zpP+p+q+-0
9P+-zP-+-+0
9+-tRNzP-zP-0
9-+-sN-zP-zP0
9+-tRQ+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

27.Qf3!
Black queen is too active.
27...Qg5?!
Magnus said that black should avoid the
queen's exchange, but I am not so sure.
White's queen will be very dominant on f3.
After 27...Qf3 28.Nf3 g5! 29.Nfe5 Rde7
white is better, but black remains solid.
28.h4 Qe7 29.Rc6!
The rook will prove very powerful here.
29...Nf6 30.Nf4! g6?
Aronian prevents Nh5 but weakens his
kingside with this move. It was not good for
black 30...Bf4 31.Qf4 Rc8 32.Rb6; But it
was possible to stay passive. 30...Ba3
31.R1c2 Bd6 White is better. Magnus
pointed a possible plan involving the transfer
of the knight from d2 to c3.
31.h5!

XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+r+k+0
9+-zprwqp+-0
9-zpRvl-snpzp0
9zpP+p+-+P0
9P+-zP-sN-+0
9+-+-zPQzP-0
9-+-sN-zP-+0
9+-tR-+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

31...Kg7

Carlsen had to foresee the following
variation: 31...g5 32.Nd5! Nd5 33.Qd5 and
white is winning: 33...Ba3 (If 33...Bg3
34.Qf5 Bd6 35.Nc4 Qe6 36.Nd6 Rd6 37.Qe6
Rde6 38.Rc7) 34.Qf5! Bc1 35.Rh6 with a
mating attack; And if 31...Bf4 32.Qf4 Nh5
33.Qh6 and black cannot fight against the
white knight landing on g5 or e5. 33...Ng7
34.Nf3 Nf5 35.Qf4 Nd6 36.Ne5 Rdd8
37.Rc7 etc.
32.hg6 fg6 33.Nd5 Nd5 34.Qd5 Bg3
If 34...Ba3 35.Qd7! wins.
35.Qg2 Bd6
It doesn't work for black 35...Bf2 36.Qf2
Qg5 37.Kf1 Rf8 38.Nf3 Qg4 39.Ke2 Rdf7
40.Rc7! etc.
36.Nc4! Rf8?
The last mistake in a difficult position.
36...Qd8! was the only move to stay alive.
After 37.Nd6! (Also good is 37.f4!; But not
37.Ne5? Be5 38.Qg6? Kh8 39.Qh6? Rh7)
37...cd6 38.Qg4 white is much better.
37.Ne5!

XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-tr-+0
9+-zprwq-mk-0
9-zpRvl-+pzp0
9zpP+-sN-+-0
9P+-zP-+-+0
9+-+-zP-+-0
9-+-+-zPQ+0
9+-tR-+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

After this move it is game over.
37...Be5 38.Qg6 Kh8 39.Qh6 Kg8 40.de5
Qe5 41.Rg6! Kf7
If 41...Rg7 42.Rg7 Qg7 43.Qg7 Kg7 44.Rc7
etc.
42.Rc4! Qa1
42...Rd1 43.Kg2 Qd5 44.e4! Qc4 45.Rf6
Ke7 46.Qf8 Kd7 47.Rf7 Ke6 48.Qe7#.
43.Kg2 Rh8 44.Rf4 Ke8 45.Re6! Re7
46.Re7 Ke7 47.Re4

background image

FIDE Surveys – Miguel Illescas

4

And black resigned in view of:
47...Kd8 48.Rd4! Qd4 49.Qg5!
Winning – 1:0.

Anand : Ljubojevic
Villarrobledo 1998

This game was played at a rapid tournament.
That is why it is even more impressive to see
Anand's technique.
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e3
h6 6.Bh4 0–0 7.Nf3 b6 8.Rc1 Bb7 9.Bf6
Bf6 10.cd5 ed5 11.b4 a6?!
A rare move. Black two main plans are
connected with the moves 11...c6, planning
a7–a5 or the inmediate 11...c5.
12.Be2 Re8 13.0–0 Nd7 14.Qb3 Nf8
15.Rfd1 Qd6 16.b5!

XIIIIIIIIY
9r+-+rsnk+0
9+lzp-+pzp-0
9pzp-wq-vl-zp0
9+P+p+-+-0
9-+-zP-+-+0
9+QsN-zPN+-0
9P+-+LzPPzP0
9+-tRR+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

White plans to take on a6 and jump to b5 so
black's answer is kind of forced.
16...a5
This wing is closed, but we reach the typical
position with an ugly backward pawn on c7.
17.Bf1!
Anand wisely prepares the transfer of his
bishop to g2, from where it will make
pressure on the weak pawn on d5.
17...Rad8 18.g3 h5!?
Ljubo will try to create some play on the
kingside.
19.Bg2 h4 20.Ne2
Cleaning the c file.
20...hg3 21.hg3 Ne6 22.Nf4!

XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-trr+k+0
9+lzp-+pzp-0
9-zp-wqnvl-+0
9zpP+p+-+-0
9-+-zP-sN-+0
9+Q+-zPNzP-0
9P+-+-zPL+0
9+-tRR+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

22...Ng5
White is better after 22...Nf4 23.ef4 Re7
24.Ne5.
23.Rc2
Another typical procedure: white doubles on
the c file.
23...Nf3 24.Bf3 Bg5 25.Ne2 g6 26.Rdc1
Rd7 27.Rc3 Kg7 28.Qc2
With this move black is forced to remain
passive.
28...Bd8 29.Nf4 Rh8 30.Qd3 Rh6 31.a3
Re7

XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-vl-+-+0
9+lzp-trpmk-0
9-zp-wq-+ptr0
9zpP+p+-+-0
9-+-zP-sN-+0
9zP-tRQzPLzP-0
9-+-+-zP-+0
9+-tR-+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

32.Bg2?!
This is not very precise, because black may
play g5 at one point.
32.a4 Qd7 33.Qd1 and 33...g5 is well met by
34.Nh5.
32...Re8?!

background image

FIDE Surveys – Miguel Illescas

5

Black had a unique opportunitie to create
real counterchances with 32...Qd7! 33.a4 g5!
34.Ne2 Re8 and white has somehow lost
control of the kingside.
33.Qd1 Reh8 34.Nd3
Heading for e5. White has again everything
under control.
34...Qd7 35.a4
No hurry. White consolidates before taking
further actions.
35...Rh2?!
Black tries to create counterplay on the h
file, but he will not be in time.
36.Qf3! Qe6 37.Ne5 R2h5 38.Qf7!

XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-vl-+-tr0
9+lzp-+Qmk-0
9-zp-+q+p+0
9zpP+psN-+r0
9P+-zP-+-+0
9+-tR-zP-zP-0
9-+-+-zPL+0
9+-tR-+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

A simple and logical way to continue.
Following the footsteps of Capablanca,
Anand liquidates into a winning endgame.
38...Qf7 39.Nf7 Kf7 40.Rc7! Bc7 41.Rc7
Kf6 42.Rb7
Black loses the b6 pawn and rest is
irrelevant.
42...Rc8 43.Rb6 Kf7 44.Bf3 Rc1 45.Kg2
Rhh1 46.Bd5 Kg7 47.Rb7 Kh6 48.Kf3 Rh2
49.b6 Rc2 50.Rb8 Rhf2 51.Kg4 Rf5 52.b7
1:0.

Topalov : Sasikiran
Sofia 2007

In this game we will see the importance for
black to control the queenside not allowing
the opponent to do his plan.
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 b6 5.Bd3
Bb7 6.Nf3 0–0 7.0–0 d5 8.a3 Bd6 9.cd5 ed5
10.b4 Nbd7
10...a6 is considered the main line here, and
for a good reason. If 11.b5?! ab5 12.Nb5
Be7 and black is fine.
11.b5!? Ne4?!
Black is paying no attention to the
opponent's idea.
11...a6! was probably necessary: 12.Qc2 Be7
13.ba6 Ba6 14.Ba6 Ra6 15.Nb5 c5=,
Korobov : Vallejo Pons (Karlsruhe 2016).
12.Bb2 Re8
Now 12...a6 can be met with 13.a4.
13.a4! Re6 14.Ne2 a5

XIIIIIIIIY
9r+-wq-+k+0
9+lzpn+pzpp0
9-zp-vlr+-+0
9zpP+p+-+-0
9P+-zPn+-+0
9+-+LzPN+-0
9-vL-+NzPPzP0
9tR-+Q+RmK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

15.Ba3!
This is white's main idea. After the Bd6 is
gone, the weakness of c7 will become
evident.
15...Rc8 16.Bd6 cd6
White has a slight but permanent advantage.
17.Rc1 Ndf6 18.h3 Re7 19.Qb3 h6 20.Rc8
Qc8 21.Rc1 Rc7 22.Rc7 Qc7 23.Qc2!

background image

FIDE Surveys – Miguel Illescas

6

XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+k+0
9+lwq-+pzp-0
9-zp-zp-sn-zp0
9zpP+p+-+-0
9P+-zPn+-+0
9+-+LzPN+P0
9-+Q+NzPP+0
9+-+-+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

23...Qe7
Better was 23...Qc2 24.Bc2. Still, black will
suffer in this endgame, since d5 is very
weak. White will play f3, and slowly
improve his position bringing the bishop to
b3 and a knight to c3, with big pressure.
24.Qc1 g6 25.Nh2 Kg7 26.h4 Ne8 27.f3
N4f6 28.Nf1 h5 29.Nf4 Nd7 30.Qe1 Nf8
31.Qg3 Kh6

XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+nsn-+0
9+l+-wqp+-0
9-zp-zp-+pmk0
9zpP+p+-+p0
9P+-zP-sN-zP0
9+-+LzPPwQ-0
9-+-+-+P+0
9+-+-+NmK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

White was much better. Topalov won the
game after a sacrifice which was not
completely clear.
32.Nh5 gh5 33.Qg8 f5 34.Ng3 Ng7 35.Bf5
Ng6 36.Bg6 Kg6 37.Nh5 Qe3 38.Kh2 Qe7
39.Nf4 Kf6 40.g4 Qf7 41.Qd8 Qe7 42.Qg8
Qf7 43.Qd8 Qe7 44.Qe7 Ke7 45.Kg3 Ne6
46.Ne6 Ke6 47.f4 Bc8 48.f5 Kf7 49.h5 Bd7
50.h6 Kg8 51.Kf4 Be8 52.Kg5 Kf7 53.h7

Kg7 54.h8Q Kh8 55.Kf6 Bb5 56.Ke7 Bd3
57.f6 Bg6 58.f7 Bf7 59.Kf7 1:0.


Ivanchuk : Nisipeanu
Foros 2006

Also in the endgame the c6–c7 weaknesses
can prove just enough to loose the game
against a mighty opponent.
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Bb7 5.Bg2
Bb4 6.Bd2 Bd2 7.Qd2 0–0 8.Nc3 Ne4
9.Qd3 Nc3 10.Ng5 Ne4 11.Ne4 d5 12.cd5
Bd5 13.0–0 Nc6 14.Rfd1 Qe7 15.Nc3 Bg2
16.Kg2 Nb4 17.Qc4 Nd5 18.Rac1 Rac8
19.Qc6 Rfd8 20.e3 Kf8 21.Nd5 ed5 22.Rc3
Qd7 23.Rdc1 Qc6 24.Rc6 Rd7

XIIIIIIIIY
9-+r+-mk-+0
9zp-zpr+pzpp0
9-zpR+-+-+0
9+-+p+-+-0
9-+-zP-+-+0
9+-+-zP-zP-0
9PzP-+-zPKzP0
9+-tR-+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy

25.h4! Ke8 26.h5! h6 27.b4 Kd8 28.Kf3
Re7 29.g4 Kd7 30.b5 Kd8 31.a4
White has won space in both flanks.
31...Kd7?!
31...Re4! was necessary, forcing white to
work harder.
32.Kf4! Re6 33.Re6! fe6?
33...Ke6 34.Rc6 Kd7 35.Ke5 a6 36.Kd5 ab5
37.ab5 Ra8 38.Rc2 Ra5 39.Rb2±.
34.Ke5+– a6 35.Rc6 ab5 36.ab5 Re8 37.f3
Re7 38.f4 Re8 39.g5 Re7 40.gh6 gh6
41.Kf6 Re8 42.Kf7 Re7 43.Kg6 Re8
44.Kh6 Rg8 45.Kh7 Rg3 46.Rc3 Ke7
47.Rc7 Kf6 48.h6 Rg1 49.Rb7 Ra1 50.Rb8
Ra7 51.Kg8 Kg6 52.Re8 Kf6 53.Rb8 Ra1
54.Rf8 1:0.

background image

FIDE Surveys – Miguel Illescas

7

Karpov : Salov
Linares 1992

Another classical example, reaching the
endgame.
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.g3 Ba6 5.b3
Bb7 6.Bg2 Bb4 7.Bd2 a5 8.0–0 0–0 9.Nc3
d5 10.Qc2 Na6 11.Rad1 h6 12.Ne5 Qc8
13.Bh3 Qe8 14.cd5 ed5 15.Bf4 Rd8 16.Qc1
Bc8 17.Bg2 Bb7 18.a3 Bd6 19.Nc4 Bf4
20.Qf4 Bc8 21.Ne3 Be6 22.Nf5 Bf5 23.Qf5
Qe6 24.Qd3 Nb8 25.b4!

XIIIIIIIIY
9-sn-tr-trk+0
9+-zp-+pzp-0
9-zp-+qsn-zp0
9zp-+p+-+-0
9-zP-zP-+-+0
9zP-sNQ+-zP-0
9-+-+PzPLzP0
9+-+R+RmK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

25...ab4 26.ab4 Nc6 27.b5 Na5 28.Rfe1
Rfe8 29.Rc1 Qd6 30.Rc2 Re7 31.e3 g6
32.Rec1 Kg7 33.Ne2 Ra8 34.Nf4 Ra7
35.Ra2 Rd7 36.Qa3 Qa3 37.Ra3 Kf8

XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-mk-+0
9tr-zpr+p+-0
9-zp-+-snpzp0
9snP+p+-+-0
9-+-zP-sN-+0
9tR-+-zP-zP-0
9-+-+-zPLzP0
9+-tR-+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

38.Nd3± Ke8 39.Nb4 h5 40.Rac3 Kd8
41.Rc6 Ne4 42.Bh3 Rd6 43.Rd6 Nd6

44.Bf1 Ne4 45.Nd5+– Nb3 46.Rc2 g5
47.Be2 Ra1 48.Kg2 Nc1 49.f3 Nd6 50.Bf1
g4 51.fg4 hg4 52.Nf6 Ra2 53.Rf2 Rf2
54.Kf2 Na2 55.e4 Nc3 56.Ke3 Ncb5 57.d5
c5 58.dc6 Na7 59.e5 Ndc8 60.c7 Kc7
61.Bc4 Nc6 62.Ng4 1:0.


Nakamura : Pichot
PRO League, 2017

In this game white didn't play well the
opening and was unable to use the weakness
of the c7 pawn.
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.g3 d5 4.Bg2 Bb4 5.Nd2
0–0 6.Ngf3 b6 7.0–0 Bb7 8.cd5 ed5 9.a3
Bd6 10.b4 Nbd7 11.Bb2 Re8 12.e3 Ne4
13.Qb3 Ndf6 14.Rac1?! a5! 15.b5

XIIIIIIIIY
9r+-wqr+k+0
9+lzp-+pzpp0
9-zp-vl-sn-+0
9zpP+p+-+-0
9-+-zPn+-+0
9zPQ+-zPNzP-0
9-vL-sN-zPLzP0
9+-tR-+RmK-0
xiiiiiiiiy

15...a4!
A very important move. The pawn on b5
will be weak.
16.Qd3 Ra5! 17.Bc3 Nc3 18.Rc3 Ne4
19.Rc2 Qd7 20.Rb1 Qe7
20...Qf5!? 21.Nf1 Ng3!
21.Rbc1?
The passive 21.Ra2 was necessary.
21...Ba3 22.Rc7 Bc1! 23.Re7 Re7
And black has a decisive advantage. The rest
is easy.
24.Qc2 Nd2 25.Nd2 Bd2 26.Bd5 Bb4
27.Ba2 Bd6 28.Kf1 g6 29.d5 a3 30.Qc4
Rc7 31.Qh4 Rc1 32.Kg2 Rb5 33.e4 Rb2
34.Qf6 Bc5 35.d6 Rf2 36.Qf2 0:1.

background image

FIDE Surveys – Miguel Illescas

8

Material for study


Bacrot : Sasikiran
Corsica 2005

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.e3
0–0 6.b4 b6 7.Qb3 e6 8.cd5 ed5 9.Be2 Bb7
10.0–0 Nbd7 11.b5 Re8 12.Bb2 h5 13.a4
Ne4 14.Rfc1 Ndf6 15.Ne5 Bf8 16.Ne4 Ne4
17.Bf3 Re6 18.Qc2 Bd6 19.a5 Rb8 20.ab6
ab6 21.Ra7 Qe8 22.Qd3 Rf6 23.h3 Qe6
24.Ba3 Be5 25.de5 Rf3 26.gf3 Ng5 27.f4
Nh3 28.Kf1 Qg4 29.Rc7 Qf3 30.Ke1 Nf4
31.Qd1 Qe4 32.Rab7 Rb7 33.Rb7 h4 34.Rb8
Kh7 35.Qd4 Qd4 36.ed4 h3 37.Be7 h2
38.Bf6 1:0.

Ivanchuk : Piket
Monte Carlo 1999

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 b6 4.Nc3 Bb7 5.e3
Bb4 6.Bd3 0–0 7.0–0 d5 8.a3 Bd6 9.cd5 ed5
10.b4 Nbd7 11.Bb2 Re8 12.Qc2 a6 13.b5 a5
14.a4 Ne4 15.Ba3 Rc8 16.Rfc1 Ndf6 17.Qb2
Ng4 18.Nd1 h6 19.h3 Ngf6 20.Rc2 Qe7
21.Be2 Qe6 22.Rac1 Qe7 23.Bd6 cd6
24.Ne1 Rc2 25.Rc2 Rc8 26.Nd3 Rc4 27.Qc1
Qc7 28.Ne1 Rc2 29.Qc2 Qc2 30.Nc2 Ng5
31.f3 Kf8 32.Kf2 Ke7 33.Nc3 Ne6 34.Ne1
Kd8 35.Bd1 Ng8 36.Bb3 Ne7 37.Nd3 Kd7
38.h4 g5 39.hg5 hg5 40.g4 f6 41.Nc1 Ng7
42.N1e2 f5 43.gf5 Ngf5 44.Ng3 Ng7 45.Kg2
Ngf5 46.Nf5 Nf5 47.Kf2 Ke6 48.Ne4 Bc8
49.Ng5 Kf6 50.f4 Bb7 51.Bd1 Nh6 52.Bf3
Kf5 53.Ke2 Ba8 54.Kd3 Ng8 55.Bg2 Nf6
56.Bh3 Kg6 57.Bc8 Ne4 58.Ne6 Nf2 59.Kd2
Ne4 60.Kc2 1:0.


Wojtaszek : Khairullin
Aix les Bains 2011

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.Nf3 b6 5.e3
Bb7 6.Bd3 0–0 7.0–0 d5 8.cd5 ed5 9.a3 Bd6
10.b4 a6 11.Qb3 Qe7 12.Rb1 Nbd7 13.a4
Rfb8 14.b5 ab5 15.ab5 g6 16.h3 h6 17.Re1
Ra7 18.Bb2 Qe6 19.Nd2 Rba8 20.Qc2 Bf8
21.e4 de4 22.Nde4 Be4 23.Ne4 Bg7 24.Bc4
Qf5 25.g4 Qf3 26.Re3 Qf4 27.Ng3 Nf8
28.Bf7 Kh7 29.Bb3 Rd8 30.Rbe1 Rd7
31.Re5 Ra8 32.Qc4 Rad8 33.R1e4 Qd2
34.Bc3 Qc1 35.Kg2 Nd5 36.Ne2 Qa3 37.Nf4
Be5 38.Nd5 Rd5 39.Re5 c6 40.Bb4 Qa8
41.bc6 b5 42.Qd5 Rd5 43.Bd5 1:0.

Bu Xiangzhi : Li Yankai
Ho Chi Minh City 2017

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.d4 Bg7 5.e3
0–0 6.Bd2 e6 7.Rc1 b6 8.cd5 ed5 9.b4 Bb7
10.Be2 Nbd7 11.b5 Ne4 12.0–0 Nd2 13.Qd2
Qe7 14.Rc2 Qd6 15.Rfc1 Rfe8 16.a4 Nf8
17.a5 Rac8 18.Na2 Ne6 19.Nb4 Nd8 20.g3
Bf8 21.Nd3 f6 22.Bf1 Qd7 23.Nf4 g5
24.Nd3 Bd6 25.Nc5 Qf5 26.Qd3 Qd3
27.Nd3 Re7 28.Nd2 Rb8 29.Bg2 Kf7
30.Nb1 Ke6 31.Nc3 c5 32.dc5 bc5 33.Rd1
d4 34.ed4 cd4 35.Ne2 Bg2 36.Nd4 Kf7
37.Kg2 Re4 38.Nf5 Bf8 39.Nc5 Bc5 40.Rc5
Kg6 41.Rd7 Ne6 42.Rcd5 1:0.






Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2015 10 29 Miguel Illescas The move that was never played
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2012 11 01 Miguel Illescas Damiano s Mate
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2016 05 28 Miguel Illescas Invisible morphology of the chessboard A homage to
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2012 11 01 Miguel Illescas Lolli s Mate
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2011 10 31 Miguel Illescas Fool s Mate
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2011 10 31 Miguel Illescas Lucena s mate
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2017 05 19 Miguel Illescas Working with Computers
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 10 09, Miguel Illescas A slow sacrifice Think twice!
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2010 10 22 Miguel Illescas A Very Bad Game
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2010 10 22 Miguel Illescas Practical Endgames
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2013 10 18, Miguel Illescas Modern opening preparation
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2012 06 01 Jeroen Bosch Passed pawn
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2018 12 02 Judit Polgar The g7 square French blocked structure
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2018 04 28 Oleksandr Sulypa Rook endgames
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2012 06 30 Andrew Martin A Tough Session
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2018 03 31 Jeroen Bosch A classical lesson Trading Bishop for Knight
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2018 02 28 Alonso Zapata Follow the Checks (II)
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2015 06 30 Spyridon Skembris Inspiration from the Classics
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2011 06 30 Uwe Bönsch A Very Special Ending

więcej podobnych podstron