FIDE Trainers Surveys 2010 01 30 Efstratios Grivas The Useless Isolani


The Useless Isolani
Efstratios Grivas, 2010
A pawn is considered isolated when there are no pawns of the same colour on the neighbouring
files. Thus, it has been detached from the rest of its camp's pawn-structure and can be supported
only by pieces.
One very sensitive issue that both sides must attend to with great care is the matter of piece
exchanges. The question to be asked is: which piece exchange is favourable for each side, and
consequently undesirable for the other? In general, the possessor of the isolated pawn should avoid
unnecessary piece exchanges without gaining anything substantial in return. If he must accede to
some exchange and has a choice, then it is best to avoid exchanges of the minor pieces (bishops
and knights) and prefer those of the major pieces (queens and rooks). In an endgame with minor
pieces the chances of survival are especially high, while in a major-piece ending these chances are
virtually nil.
This survey focus on what happens when the side with the isolated pawn has wrongly exchanged
important minor pieces, thus minimizing his chances of active play. Then the important strategical
theme of the useless  isolani becomes a reality!
Our first example is an excellent lesson on how to profit from such a pawn s negative factors:
Ä„% Kortchnoi,Viktor
% Karpov,Anatoly
D53 Merano WCC 1981
1.c4 e6 2.Nc3 d5 3.d4 Be7 4.Nf3 Nf6 5.Bg5 h6 6.Bh4 0 0 7.Rc1 dxc4 8.e3 c5 9.Bxc4 cxd4
10.exd4 Nc6 11.0 0 Nh5 12.Bxe7 Nxe7 13.Bb3 Nf6 14.Ne5 Bd7 15.Qe2 Rc8 16.Ne4 Nxe4
17.Qxe4 Bc6 18.Nxc6 Rxc6 19.Rc3 Qd6 20.g3 Rd8 21.Rd1 Rb6 22.Qe1 Qd7 23.Rcd3 Rd6
24.Qe4 Qc6 25.Qf4 Nd5 26.Qd2 Qb6 27.Bxd5 Rxd5 (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-tr-+k+0
9zpp+-+pzp-0
9-wq-+p+-zp0
9+-+r+-+-0
9-+-zP-+-+0
9+-+R+-zP-0
9PzP-wQ-zP-zP0
9+-+R+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy
1
White did not handle the position's requirements properly, as he exchanged all the light pieces
without any benefit by it. As a result he has remained with a useless isolani and only defending
chances in a worst position. Black has a clear plan: treble his heavy pieces along the d-file (e.g.
...R8d7, ...Qd8) and then proceed with an eventual ...e5, winning the white d4-pawn.
28.Rb3 Qc6 29.Qc3 Qd7
The rush 29...e5? 30.Qxc6 bxc6 31.Rc1 exd4 32.Rxc6 d3 33.Rc1 would decrees Black's advantage
to the minimum.
30.f4
The only way to avoid the d4-pawn lose. But now the white king is further weakened. Although
Black can continue with a straight plan involving ...f6 and ...e5 he decided to focus on the
opponent king.
30...b6
30...b5?! 31.Ra3! creates some counterplay.
31.Rb4 b5!
Threatening 32...a5!.
32.a4 bxa4 33.Qa3 (D)
Not of a help is 33.Qc4 Ra5 34.Qd3 Rc8 35.Rd2 Qd6 36.Rc4 Rxc4 37.Qxc4 a3 38.bxa3 Rxa3.
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-tr-+k+0
9zp-+q+pzp-0
9-+-+p+-zp0
9+-+r+-+-0
9ptR-zP-zP-+0
9wQ-+-+-zP-0
9-zP-+-+-zP0
9+-+R+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy
33...a5! 34.Rxa4 Qb5!
Black's pieces become extremely active (compare them to the passive and inharmoniously placed
White's pieces) and they are ready to penetrate in-to White's camp.
2
35.Rd2 (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-tr-+k+0
9+-+-+pzp-0
9-+-+p+-zp0
9zpq+r+-+-0
9R+-zP-zP-+0
9wQ-+-+-zP-0
9-zP-tR-+-zP0
9+-+-+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy
35...e5!
Black no longer is interest on the d4 isolani; the white king is the main target.
36.fxe5 Rxe5
Threatening 37...Re1+.
37.Qa1
The alternatives are equally "difficult for White:
a) 37.Rf2 Re1+ 38.Kg2 Qc6+ 39.d5! Rxd5! (39...Qxd5+ 40.Qf3 -/+) 40.Qf3 Qe6 41.b4 Re3
42.Qf4 Rh5 43.h4 g5 44.Qf6 Qe4+ 45.Rf3 Rxf3 46.Qxf3 Qc2+ 47.Kg1 Qxa4 48.Qxh5 axb4 -+.
b) 37.dxe5 Rxd2 38.Rxa5 Qe2 -+.
37...Qe8!
Forcing White's hand as the threat 38...Re1+ remains deadly.
38.dxe5
38.Kf2 Rf5+ -+; 38.Rd1 Re2 39.Ra3 Qe4 -+.
38...Rxd2 (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+q+k+0
9+-+-+pzp-0
9-+-+-+-zp0
9zp-+-zP-+-0
9R+-+-+-+0
9+-+-+-zP-0
9-zP-tr-+-zP0
9wQ-+-+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy
39.Rxa5
There are no chances left for White: 39.Qe1 Qd7 (39...Qd8 40.Ra1 Qd4+ 41.Kf1 Qd5 -+) 40.e6
fxe6 41.Ra1 Qd4+; 39.Rf4 Qxe5 -+.
39...Qc6 40.Ra8+
3
40.Qf1 Qb6+ -+.
40...Kh7 41.Qb1+ g6
41...Rc2 is equally good: 42.Qf1 Rc1.
42.Qf1 Qc5+
Black did not fall for the "cheap" trap 42...Qxa8?? 43.Qxf7+ =.
43.Kh1 Qd5+
White resigned as the coming 44...Rd1 is decisive.
0 1
When the isolated pawn is nearer to the defending side s camp, then the defence might be easier.
Although this pawn can mostly be regarded as a backward and weak one, it seems that there are
more salvaging chances.
Ä„% Grivas,Efstratios
% Pekarek,Ales
E11 Bucharest 1984
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Bb4+ 4.Bd2 Qe7 5.g3 Nc6 6.Nc3 d6 7.Bg2 e5 8.Nd5 Bxd2+ 9.Qxd2
Nxd5 10.cxd5 Nxd4 11.Nxd4 exd4 12.Qxd4 0 0 13.e3 Bd7 14.0 0 c5 15.dxc6 Bxc6 16.Rfd1
Rfd8 17.Rac1 Bxg2 18.Kxg2 a6 (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9r+-tr-+k+0
9+p+-wqpzpp0
9p+-zp-+-+0
9+-+-+-+-0
9-+-wQ-+-+0
9+-+-zP-zP-0
9PzP-+-zPKzP0
9+-tRR+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy
In the position that has arisen the most significant strategic element is Black's backward d-pawn,
which is also isolated. The fact that this pawn is not on d5 (see the previous example), when we
would have a classic example of exploiting the isolated pawn, but on d6 makes White's task
harder, as this pawn is less exposed and the black king closer to it. White does have the advantage,
but must discover the correct plans and execute them accurately to fight for victory.
4
19.Qc4 Rd7 20.Rd4 Rad8 21.a4 h6 (D)
After 21...d5? White knows well what he has to do, in accordance with the principles of attacking
an isolated pawn.
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-tr-+k+0
9+p+rwqpzp-0
9p+-zp-+-zp0
9+-+-+-+-0
9P+QtR-+-+0
9+-+-zP-zP-0
9-zP-+-zPKzP0
9+-tR-+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy
22.a5?
A serious error, after which there seems to be no way for White to win. The correct plan for White
is the treble of his heavy pieces along the d-file (Qd3 and Rd1) and then the advance of the b-pawn
to b6, from where it would create an invasion base for the white rooks on c7. White could then
regroup his pieces with Rc4 and Rc1 and then Rc7, applying terrible pressure on the b7-pawn; in
this case White would have very good chances of victory. This is a typical and practically the only
plan in such positions; White would then most likely win by 'technical' means.
22...Qe6! 23.Rc3 Qxc4 24.Rdxc4 Kf8! 25.Kf3 Re8 26.Rb4 Re5 27.Rcb3 Rxa5 28.Rxb7 Ke7
29.R7b6 Rc7 30.g4 h5!
This move secures the draw in case Black loses the d6-pawns, provided that the queenside pawns
are exchanged in the process. In that case, the rook ending with a 3:2 majority on the kingside will
be drawn. White tried for a while.
31.h3 hxg4+ 32.hxg4 Kd7 33.R3b4 Rc6 34.Rb8 Rac5 35.Rg8 Rg5 36.Rf8 Ke7 37.Ra8 f5
38.gxf5 Rxf5+ 39.Kg3 Kf6 40.Rg4 Rg5
½ ½
5
Ä„% Tal,Mihail
% Makarichev,Sergey
A29 Tbilisi Ch-URS 1978
1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 Bb4 5.Nd5 Nxd5 6.cxd5 Nd4 7.Nxd4 exd4 8.Qc2 Qe7 9.Bg2
Ba5 10.0 0 Bb6 11.b3 d6 12.Bb2 0 0 13.e3 dxe3 14.dxe3 a5 15.a3 Bd7 16.Rfd1 Rac8 17.Bd4
c5 18.dxc6 Bxc6 19.Bxc6 Rxc6 20.Qf5 Bc5 21.b4 axb4 22.axb4 Bxd4 23.Rxd4 g6 (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-trk+0
9+p+-wqp+p0
9-+rzp-+p+0
9+-+-+Q+-0
9-zP-tR-+-+0
9+-+-zP-zP-0
9-+-+-zP-zP0
9tR-+-+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy
A very similar position compared to the previous example, but with an important difference: the
black rooks are not passive. Thus Black can keep the equilibrium.
24.Qg4
Black seems to be fine after 24.Qd3 Rfc8 25.Rd1 Rc3 = or 24.Qf4 Qe5 =.
24...Qe6 25.Qf3 Rfc8 26.Rad1 Kg7 27.Kg2 (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+r+-+-+0
9+p+-+pmkp0
9-+rzpq+p+0
9+-+-+-+-0
9-zP-tR-+-+0
9+-+-zPQzP-0
9-+-+-zPKzP0
9+-+R+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy
27...Rb6!
Activity is the main goal; passivity leads to disaster. Wise words that we often forget!
28.Re4 Qf6 29.Rf4 Qe6 30.Rd5
Or 30.Rdd4 Rb5! 31.Qd1 Rc6 32.Qd3 Re5 =.
30...Rc1 31.Rfd4 Rb1!
Too much activity is not always good: 31...Ra6? 32.Qf4 Raa1 33.Rxd6 Rg1+ 34.Kf3 +/-.
32.e4 (D)
6
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+-+0
9+p+-+pmkp0
9-tr-zpq+p+0
9+-+R+-+-0
9-zP-tRP+-+0
9+-+-+QzP-0
9-+-+-zPKzP0
9+r+-+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy
32...R1xb4??
A blunder. Black had to play 32...Kg8 33.Qc3 Rc6 34.Rc5 Qf6! =.
33.Rxb4
And Black resigned due to 33...Rxb4 34.Qc3+.
1 0
In general, endgames featuring a weak isolated pawn are a headache for the defending side.
Ä„% Szabo,Laszlo
% Penrose,Jonathan
A33 Bath ETC 1973
1.c4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.d4 cxd4 5.Nxd4 e6 6.Ndb5 Bb4 7.Bf4 0 0 8.Bd6 Bxd6 9.Nxd6
Qb6 10.Qd2 Nd4 11.Rd1 Qxd6 12.Qxd4 Qxd4 13.Rxd4 d5 14.cxd5 Nxd5 15.Nxd5 exd5 16.e3
Be6 17.Kd2 Rfd8 18.Bd3 Rac8 19.f4 f6 20.Rc1 Rxc1 21.Kxc1 h6 (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-tr-+k+0
9zpp+-+-zp-0
9-+-+lzp-zp0
9+-+p+-+-0
9-+-tR-zP-+0
9+-+LzP-+-0
9PzP-+-+PzP0
9+-mK-+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy
The diagram position is very instructive. White's plan is simple and consists of two phases. During
the first phase White will maximize the potential of his pieces, bringing his king to d4 and his
bishop to f3. The second phase consists of the kingside breakthrough. Black can hardly react to
this plan, as the absence of an adequate number of offensive and defensive pieces leads him to
passivity. This is a "textbook" example and constitutes perfect proof of the value of "middlegame
theory". The continuation of the game fully justified White's play.
7
22.Kd2 Kf8 23.Ra4
Creating some more weaknesses is always an enjoyable feature!
23...a6 24.Rb4 Rd7 25.Kc3 Ke7
25...d4+? 26.Rxd4 Rxd4 27.exd4 +/- Bxa2? 28.b3 is losing a piece.
26.Kd4 Kd8 27.Be2!
The king found its proper place; now it s the bishop's turn.
27...Kc7 28.Bf3 b6 29.Rb3
The rook will be needed in the kingside, so he has to return back.
29...Rd8 30.Rc3+ (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-tr-+-+0
9+-mk-+-zp-0
9pzp-+lzp-zp0
9+-+p+-+-0
9-+-mK-zP-+0
9+-tR-zPL+-0
9PzP-+-+PzP0
9+-+-+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy
30...Kb7?
This is an easy losing move. The king belongs to the centre, either to press or either just to defend.
White would be better after 30...Kd6 31.h3 Rb8 32.g4 +/- but far away from winning.
31.g4 Rd6
If 31...g5 then 32.Rc2 Bf7 33.h4! Rd7 34.Rh2 and the white's rook penetration in-to Black's camp
will be decisive.
32.a3 a5 33.h4 Bf7 34.f5!
Creating a real target; the black g7-pawn!
8
34...Rd8 35.Rc2 Rd7 (D)
35...g6 36.fxg6 Bxg6 37.Rf2 Kc6 38.Rf1 Bf7 (38...Rd6 39.Rc1+ Kd7 40.Bxd5) 39.Bg2 Rd6 40.g5
+-.
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+-+0
9+k+r+lzp-0
9-zp-+-zp-zp0
9zp-+p+P+-0
9-+-mK-+PzP0
9zP-+-zPL+-0
9-zPR+-+-+0
9+-+-+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy
36.g5!
Fullfing the second phase.
36...fxg5
The alternative is 36...hxg5 37.hxg5 Bg8 38.g6! (Black's bishop now is just an observer) 38...Rd6
39.Be2! Rd8 40.Bb5 Rd6 41.a4 Rd8 (41...Kb8 42.Rc6) 42.Rc6 +-.
37.hxg5 hxg5 38.Rg2 Rd6
38...Kc6 39.Rxg5 Be8 (39...Bg8 40.f6) 40.a4 +-.
39.Rxg5 g6 40.fxg6 Rxg6
Black resigned due to 41.Bxd5+ Kc7 42.Rxg6 Bxg6 43.Ke5. Finally the useless isolani felt in
White's hand!
1 0
Ä„% Grivas,Efstratios
% Renet,Olivier
E16 Yerevan OL 1996
1.Nf3 Nf6 2.d4 e6 3.c4 Bb4+ 4.Nbd2 b6 5.g3 Bb7 6.Bg2 0 0 7.0 0 d5 8.cxd5 exd5 9.Ne5 Bd6
10.Ndc4 Be7 11.Ne3 Qc8 12.Qc2 g6 13.b3 c5 14.Bb2 Na6 15.Rac1 Qe6 16.Nd3 Nb4 17.Nxb4
cxb4 18.Qc7 Rab8 19.Qe5 Bd6 20.Qxe6 fxe6 21.Rc2 Rbc8 22.Rfc1 Kf7 23.Rxc8 Bxc8 24.Rc2
Ke7 25.f3 Bb7 26.Nd1 Nd7 27.Bh3 a5 28.Bc1 e5 29.Bg5+ Ke8 30.Be3 exd4 31.Bxd4 Bc5
32.Bxc5 Nxc5 33.Rd2 Ke7 34.Ne3 Rd8 35.Nc2 Bc6 36.Bg2 Ne6 37.f4 Nc5 38.Kf2 Rd6 39.Ke1
Ne6 40.Nd4 Bd7 41.Kd1 Nc5 42.Nc2 Be6 43.Bf3 Bf7 44.Rd4 Na6 45.Rd2 Nc5 46.e3 Be6
9
47.Nd4 Bd7 (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+lmk-+p0
9-zp-tr-+p+0
9zp-snp+-+-0
9-zp-sN-zP-+0
9+P+-zPLzP-0
9P+-tR-+-zP0
9+-+K+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy
48.g4!
White sets the correct plan in motion, namely the advance of the kingside majority (3:2).
48...Ne6?!
Black hopes to pressurize White's queenside pawns with his light-squared bishop, but this plan
fails to materialize and therefore Black should have refrained from exchanging more pieces.
49.g5! Nxd4 50.Rxd4 Be6 (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+-mk-+p0
9-zp-trl+p+0
9zp-+p+-zP-0
9-zp-tR-zP-+0
9+P+-zPL+-0
9P+-+-+-zP0
9+-+K+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy
Having nailed down Black's kingside pawns, White plans the h4-h5 advance, which will either
lead to an open file for the white rook to invade or to a further weakening of Black's kingside
structure. In both cases White's advantage will reach decisive proportions.
51.h4!
Setting in motion the natural break!
51...Rd7 52.h5 gxh5
After 52...Rd6 White can continue either by bringing his king to d4 and his rook to h2, or by the
direct 53.h6! Rd7 54.e4 dxe4 55.Rxd7+ Kxd7 56.Bxe4 Bg8 57.Kd2 followed by Kd3-d4 and f5,
winning easily.
53.Bxh5 Bf5 54.Bf3 Ke6 55.Rd2 Rd6 56.Ke1! (D)
10
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+-+-+p0
9-zp-trk+-+0
9zp-+p+lzP-0
9-zp-+-zP-+0
9+P+-zPL+-0
9P+-tR-+-+0
9+-+-mK-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy
The last detail! White will bring his king to g3, from where it will endeavour to exchange the
lightsquared bishops. Black is unable to react.
56...Rd7 57.Kf2 Rd6 58.Kg3 Ke7 59.Bg4 Be4
Black desperately tries to avoid exchanges.
60.f5 h6!?
Attempting to set up a defence on the dark squares after 61.g6 Kf6!.
61.Kf4! hxg5+ 62.Kxg5 Rf6 63.Rh2!
White now wins easily as the "extra" pawn on f5 is very powerful.
63...Rf8 64.Rh6 Bb1 65.Rxb6 Bxa2 66.f6+ Rxf6 67.Rxf6 Bxb3 68.Rb6
1 0
An isolated pawn can be a problem even if it is not straight attacked, as it can easily drive the
defender side in-to an inharmonious status.
Ä„% Grivas,Efstratios
% Papafitsoros,Konstantinos
D32 Athens tt 2006
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 c5 5.cxd5 exd5 6.Bg5 Be6 7.e3 Be7 8.dxc5 0 0 9.Be2 Bxc5
10.0 0 Nbd7 11.Rc1 Rc8 12.Nd4 a6 13.Qb3 Qb6 14.Qxb6 Bxb6 15.Rfd1 Bxd4 16.Rxd4 Ne4
17.Be7 Nxc3 18.bxc3 Rfe8 19.Bb4 Ne5 20.Bd6 Nc6 21.Rdd1 Red8 22.Bc5 Ne5 23.Bd4 f6
24.Rb1 b5 25.a4 Bf5 26.Rb2 Nc4
11
27.Bxc4 bxc4 (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+rtr-+k+0
9+-+-+-zpp0
9p+-+-zp-+0
9+-+p+l+-0
9P+pvL-+-+0
9+-zP-zP-+-0
9-tR-+-zPPzP0
9+-+R+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy
In this position we can notice that there are a lot of isolated pawns around, for both sides (a6, a4,
c3 and d5). The most important factor is which side can attack them first and this is White, so he
holds the advantage. Another important factor is the better placed white d4-bishop, which on the
same time can attack and defend; his opponent can only defend and has not a stable base.
28.Rb6! += Bc2!
Worst is 28...Ra8 29.a5 Bc2 30.Rd2 Bb3 31.f3 Rd7 32.g4! +/- as White's clear plan (h4, g5 and
Rg2) can hardly be faced by Black.
29.Ra1 Ra8
White wins a pawn after 29...a5 30.Rb5 Ra8 31.Bb6 Rdb8 32.Bxa5 (32.Bc7 Rc8 33.Bxa5 Ra7)
32...Bxa4 33.Rxd5 +/-.
30.a5 Rdc8
It looks like Black could put up a tougher defence with 30...Rdb8 but White can continue with
31.Ra2 Bb3 32.Rd2 Kf7 33.Bc5 Rxb6 34.axb6 Ke6 35.e4! +/-.
31.f3!
As White keeps the queenside under control, he must seek as usual for a second front and that can
be found only in the kingside.
31...Kf8 32.g4! Ke8
32...Rcb8 33.Ra2 Bb3 (33...Bd1?! 34.Kf2 Kf7 35.Rd2 Bb3 36.Bc5 Rxb6 37.axb6 Ke6 38.e4 +-)
34.Rd2 +/-.
12
33.Rb7 Kf8 (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9r+r+-mk-+0
9+R+-+-zpp0
9p+-+-zp-+0
9zP-+p+-+-0
9-+pvL-+P+0
9+-zP-zPP+-0
9-+l+-+-zP0
9tR-+-+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy
34.Ra2! +/-
White's advantage has increased, due to his active pieces. The one white rook controls the only
open file and the second one comes to the d- or g-file, creating more threats.
34...Bb3 35.Rd2 Ba4
35...Rcb8 36.Bc5+ Kg8 37.Rb6 +/-.
36.h4 Bc6 37.Rb6 Bb5
37...Kf7 38.g5 fxg5 39.hxg5 Kg6 40.Rh2 +/-.
38.g5 fxg5 39.hxg5 Rab8?!
This loses the d5 isolani pawn. More stubborn was 39...Rc6 40.Rb7 Rg6 41.Rg2 +/-.
40.Bc5+ Kf7 41.Rxd5 Rxb6 42.Bxb6
42.axb6! Bc6 43.Rf5+ Kg6 44.e4 a5 45.Re5 +- was even better.
42...Bc6 43.Rf5+ Kg6 44.e4 Bd7 45.Rd5 Bc6 46.Re5 Re8 47.Rc5 Bb5 48.Kf2 Re7 49.Kg3 Rd7
50.Re5 Rd6 51.Bd4 Rd7 52.f4+- Kf7 53.f5 Re7? 54.Rxe7+ Kxe7 55.Bxg7 Kf7 56.Bd4 Bc6
57.Kf4 Ba4 58.e5 Bd1 59.e6+ Ke8 60.g6! hxg6 61.f6
1 0
Finally a recent example concludes this survey. By small tactical means the  stronger side
exploits the disadvantages of the isolated pawn, by just crabbing it!
13
Ä„% Grivas,Efstratios
% Hytos,Vasilios
D11 Athens tt 2007
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nbd2 Bf5 5.g3 Nbd7 6.Bg2 Qc7 7.0 0 e5 8.Nxe5 Nxe5 9.dxe5 Qxe5
10.cxd5 cxd5 11.Nf3 Qc7 12.Nd4 Bd7 13.Bf4 Bd6 14.Rc1 Qb6 15.Bxd6 Qxd6 16.Qb3 0 0 (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9r+-+-trk+0
9zpp+l+pzpp0
9-+-wq-sn-+0
9+-+p+-+-0
9-+-sN-+-+0
9+Q+-+-zP-0
9PzP-+PzPLzP0
9+-tR-+RmK-0
xiiiiiiiiy
White holds a pleasant advantage due to the weak isolated black d5-pawn and his better placed
pieces. Important is also the fact that Black cannot become active, thus he cannot claim any
compensation for his worst pawn-structure.
17.Rfd1
17.Qxb7? can only help Black: 17...Rfb8 18.Qc7 Qxc7 19.Rxc7 Rxb2 20.a3 Be6 += but maybe
17.e3 b6 18.Rc2 +/- is a better try.
17...Rfe8 18.Nb5!
Although the white knight seems to be a better piece than the black d7-bishop, the later can defend
the isolani, so it is not a bad idea at all to exchange it. When playing against the isolani, most of
the times it is a good idea to exchange the light pieces.
18...Bxb5 19.Qxb5 Rad8? (D)
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-trr+k+0
9zpp+-+pzpp0
9-+-wq-sn-+0
9+Q+p+-+-0
9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+-+-zP-0
9PzP-+PzPLzP0
9+-tRR+-mK-0
xiiiiiiiiy
Although Black's position is difficult, his last move loses material. He should opt for 19...Qb6
20.Qxb6 axb6 21.Rc2 Rxa2 22.Bxd5 Nxd5 23.Rxd5 +/- or 19...a6 20.Qd3 Qe5 21.Rd2 Rad8
22.Rdc2 +/-.
14
20.Qxb7! Rxe2
The main alternative is 20...Rb8 21.Qxa7 Rxb2 22.Bf3 Qf8! 23.Rb1! Rc2 (23...Ra8 24.Qxa8 Qxa8
25.Rxb2; 23...Rxb1 24.Rxb1 Ra8 25.Qc7 +/- Rxa2?? 26.Rb8) 24.Qa4! +/-.
21.Bxd5!
An easy combination which wins material; the useless d5 isolani!
21...Rd7
All the alternatives equally lose: 21...Nxd5 22.Rxd5 Qxd5 (22...Qf8 23.Rxd8 Qxd8 24.Rc8)
23.Qxd5 Rxd5 24.Rc8+; 21...Re7 22.Bxf7+ Kxf7 23.Rxd6 Rxb7 24.Rxd8; 21...Kh8 22.Bb3 Rd2
23.Rxd2 Qxd2 24.Rd1 Qa5 25.Rxd8+ Qxd8 26.Qxa7.
22.Rc8+ Re8
22...Ne8 23.Bxf7+ Rxf7 24.Rxe8+ Rxe8 25.Qxf7+ Kxf7 26.Rxd6 +-.
23.Rxe8+ Nxe8 24.Qc8 Kf8
24...Qe7 25.Bxf7+ Qxf7 26.Rxd7.
25.Bf3
Black resigned as after 25...Qxd1+ 26.Bxd1 Rxd1+ 27.Kg2 Rd6 28.b4 a6 29.a4 White's material
advantage will tell in the end.
1 0
15


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2010 09 29 Efstratios Grivas Endgame Analysis
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2011 10 04 Efstratios Grivas Legendary Endings
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2013 01 30, Alonso Zapata Useless Pieces
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2012 03 30 Georg Mohr Capablanca and the Endgames
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2010 04 28 Jeroen Bosch Euwe s Long Moves
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2010 04 28 Jeroen Bosch Queen Endings General Principles
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2012 09 30 Semon Palatnik Advantage of Two Bishops
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 06 29, Susan Polgar The Game Is Not Over Until It Is Over
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 04 26, Vereslav Eingorn The positional piece sacrifice as a technical r
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2013 07 02, Uwe Boensch The system of trainer education in the German Chess
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2013 04 01, Georg Mohr Bobby Fischer and the square d5
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 08 01, Andrew Martin Game analysis
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 08 01, Boris Avrukh Exchange sacrifice
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 06 01, Alexander Beliavsky Bodycheck
FIDE Surveys 2012 Efstratios Grivas The Weak Passed c pawn
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2013 04 28, Vereslav Eingorn Rook vs Bishop
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 02 28, Alonso Zapata Paralysis
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2013 02 18, Adrian Mikhalchishin

więcej podobnych podstron