m75

but went to the strongest and most powerful amir. Therefore, every Mamluk sułtan was posed with the dilemma ofwhom to appoint as commander of a distant region; a strong commander might over-throw the sułtan, a weak one lose the province. It was normal therefore to appoint two commanders, one as governor of the district, the other to command the citadel of the district’s city—and to change both freąuently.

The safety and power of the sułtan also depended on the loyalty of his mamluks and the greater part of the land of Egypt therefore came to be held by the amirs of the sultan’s bodyguard in fiefs granted by the sułtan. The amirs in their turn were obliged to divide up to two thirds of their fiefs between their own mamluks to secure their loyalty.

The nucleus of any Mamluk army therefore consisted of three main parts: the royal bodyguard (the sultan’s favourite and most loyal regiment, and indeed often the one which had placed him on the throne); the other mamluk regiments of the sułtan; and the private companies and regiments of the officers within his bodyguard. Bedouin, Turcoman and Kurdish mercenaries were hired to augment this force.

The strength of the royal bodyguard at the beginning of the 14th century was 2000 men and 40 officers, though it may have been slightly smaller during the second half of the i3th century. The sułtan could field a total of about 12,000 mamluks in 1290, and an estimated 20,000 in 1299. Theoreti-cally there was an Amir of a Thousand for every 1000 mamluks and under him lesser amirs for every unit of'40 men, with asub-section of 10 men within that.

The rapid increase in the number of mamluks towards the end of the century was mainly caused by the sułtan Kala’un (1279-90) taking the Burdiyya Regiment as his royal bodyguard after they had murdered his predecessor. This regiment consisted of 3700 men, stationed in the towers of the citadel of Cairo. They were mainly Circassians, with possibly some Armenians, and constituted a powerful and loyal force. The bulk of the other two thirds of the bodyguard remained Kipchakis, though many Mongols were taken into the mamluks after being defeated in 1260 and 1281. The Burdiyya seized the throne at the end of the century.

Third-rate troops, such as the Bedouin, and members of the now rapidly declining Bahri Regiment, were used to garrison the fortresses of the Egyptian coast against the crusaders’ sea-borne invasions. In times of great danger the royal mamluks were forced to join these garrisons, but they stayed for only short periods and freąuently returned to Cairo—the seat of all power—before being ordered to do so.

On campaign the army was accompanied by a large camel caravan; mules were rarely used and wheeled vehicles were used only for siege engines. The largest armies needed between 800-1000 camels just to carry the light armament and usually every mamluk was entitled to two camels for his gear, non-mamluk soldiers having three camels for every two men. Physicians, surgeons and hospital eąuipment travelled with the army.

The Mamluks also placed great value on bands and at one time the sultan’s band had 44 drums, 4 hautbois (oboes) and 20 trumpets. Permission to have a band was a highly coveted distinction and those amirs who received it were known as Lords of the Drums. There were about 30 such amirs, each in command of 40 horsemen, with a band of 1 o drums, 2 hautbois and 4 trumpets. The mamluks madę great use of these bands in war, and the drums are believed to have been particularly effective at creating chaos in the ranks of armies whose horses were unaccustomed to the noise.

The sułtan Baibars (1260-77) established a well organized system of posting houses connecting every part of the empire with the Capital, and relays of horses were maintained in these houses. Reports from each part of the empire were received and answered twice a week. There was also a pigeon post (copied from the Arab caliphs) with cots in the citadel at Cairo and at various stages, the pigeons being trained to fly only between these stages.

1 he Piat es

Additional costume research was carried out by G. A.

Embleton, who wishes to thank Richard and Sevil Peach

and Baha Tannmann for their assistance.

The study of arms, armour and costume in the 12th and 13th centuries has perforce to be based mainly on information contained in illuminated manu-