80591 S5002134

96

not be distinguished morę predsely, however, because of the fragmentary naturę of the finds, although there are some indications of the presence of different shaped girths in barrel-shaped formę, as well aa the varytng placement of horizontal cordons in pot profile*. The production of pottery for everyday use Is documented morę completely within the assemblage. Basic forma are repeated within indhrfdual categoriea, and some specific types have been distinguished which appear to be assodated with particuiar technologies.

PI. 10. 8urvey of the painted pottery.

Category A - Painted pottaiy

Form	Colour and patiem	Features (Figa )	Horizon
	remains of red cotour	19{26:3)-.117(26:1); 141	14.4
	red horizontal stripe	132;141	64
BARRELS	rad and white horiz. stripes	141(26:11); 286(26:7)	34
	compGcated patiem of sepia colour pamted over horizontal red and white stripes	116(26.12)	4
GLOBU LAR	horiz stripe of sepia colour	II	2
BOWLS	remans of white colour	278(264)	3
	wavy fine on the white stripe	21(26:10);146(26:2)	4
TR1PARTITE	white horizontal stripe	11(26:8)	2
POTS	remains of red colour	23/3	4
ROUNDED POTS	red and white horizontal stripes	141(264)	3
BOWLS WITH INTURNED RIMS	fundamenta] brown colour	156(22:14)	3
FLASKS	white stripe on the neck	187(223)	4
	fundamenta! brown colour	30	4
CUPS	remains of sepia cotour	32(2427}	4
RIM FRAGMENTS	white horizontal stripe	Partl, charcoal layer.llt{26:13)	14
	sepia stripe ouer white colour	111:132	34
	fundamental brown colour	Part 1. charcoal layer85;110;116 (23:5);130;142;187; 250273b282JUIl: IV 148(214.9.12.16)	1-4
BODY	wavy lin es of sepia colour ouer horiz. white stripe		2
SHERDS	fine combng drawn in stripes over white colour	276	2
	white and red horiz. stripes	238	2-3
	white horizontal stripe	116(23:13);126;187; 2624(264.14); 111(26:7)	2-4
	red horizontal stripe	116441	2-4
	sepia stripes over white colour	132;UMV	34
	horiz. stripe o! sepia colour	85.262	4
	white and sepia horiz. stripes	132	4
	red treOis decoration	113(264)	4
	remains of sepia colour	116:132254:278	24.4
	remains ot white colour	158:175	2.4
	remains of red colour	278	3

The chronological classification of pottery finds remains a dtfficult problem. Although all pottery fragments within the assemblage were stratified, the fact that the features were acddentaly sampled has to be also considered. The only dedsive guide can be the repeated occurrence of certam forms or types of pottery in larga quantities within settlement features. dassified according to the strabgraphy of particuiar horizons. The absence of a particuiar form or type has to be considered very carefully, sińce it may be accidentai. The most difficult problem was to characterise pottery production during the eartiest horizon. Only a few features were