3784497890

Aneks 1 - informacje dot. zasad zapisu danych bibliograficznych dla studentów filologii angielskiej

Metonymy is a cognitive process in which one conceptual entity, the vehicle, provides mental access to another conceptual entity, the target, within the same cognitive domain.

As Taylor puts it,

the essence of metonymy resides in the possibility of establishing connections between entities which co-occur within a given conceptual structure. [...] The entities need not be contiguous in any spatial sense. (1995: 123-124).

In fact one can draw an analogy between events like the one described above and speech acting, which can be defined as performing actions via utterances (cf. Yule 1996a: 47).

[Sjpeech acts are commonly given morę specific labels, such as apology, complaint, compliment, invitation, promise, or request. These (...) terms apply to the speaker’s communicative intention in producing an utterance. The speaker normally expects that his or her intention will be recognized by the hearer. (ibid.: 47- 48).

According to John Searle (1975: 64), politeness is the chief motivation for indirectness in directive speech acts.

Fragment bibliografii zawierający cytowane źródła:

References

Austin, John L. Ho w to Do Things with Words. 1962. London: Oxford University Press.

Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. 1999. “Speaking and thinking with metonymy”. In Panther, Klaus-Uwe and GUnter Radden (eds). Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 61-76.

Kóvecses, Zoltan and Gunter Radden. 1998. “Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view”. Cognitive Linguistics 9/1,37-77.

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Searle, John. 1975. “Indirect speech acts”. In Cole, Peter and Jerry Morgan (eds). Syntaxand Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, 59-82.

Taylor, John R. 1995. Linguistic Categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory (2^nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press (l^sl ed. 1989).

Yule, George. 1996a. Pragmatics. (Oxford Introductions to Language Study. Series Editor: H.G. Widdowson). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

-------------- 1996b. The Study of Language (2"^d ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press (l ^st ed. 1985).

UWAGA: Podane przykłady ilustrują jeden z możliwych systemów stosowania przypisów.

Ważne jest konsekwentne stosowanie w pracy jednego systemu. Promotor może zasugerować

inny system.