00027, 9ca4d2f7327a2ce6d2c71327beaafaff

background image

facing chronic shortages, if not some kind of catastrophe, before

any of these grandiose schemes is built.”

29

Outside the American Southwest, there is very little sympathy

for the unsustainable water problems faced by that region. Great

Lakes Canadians are perhaps the least sympathetic of all. “Knowl-

edgeable Canadians understand that there is no water shortage in

the U.S.,” says Ralph Pentland, a Canadian water expert. The

problem, Mr. Pentland says, is not a shortage of good water, but a

shortage of good water management. “If you look at the Colorado

Basin . . . they have problems caused by eight decades of subsidiza-

tion of dumb projects, plus a water law that doesn’t make sense.”

For decades, Canadians and Americans in the Great Lakes

Basin have feared that the thirsty will come calling. The issue has

always been, will the Great Lakes be ready for them? The topic is

complicated by a wide debate within water circles about how much

diversionary pressure the Great Lakes could realistically face as

global water stress mounts. “I think the era of big, federal, subsi-

dized water projects is over,” declares Daniel Injerd, head of the

Lake Michigan Management Section at the Illinois Department of

Natural Resources. “I don’t see a significant threat out there for

Great Lakes water, probably not in my lifetime.” Mr. Injerd’s point

is that diverting water over long distances is very, very expensive—

so expensive that it’s difficult to do without huge federal subsidies.

So Mr. Injerd and many other water experts argue that an environ-

mentally conscious America would never tolerate an enormously

subsidized, multibillion-dollar diversion plan that ships water from

one end of the nation to the other. His analysis is consistent with

that of the International Joint Commission (IJC). The IJC was cre-

ated by the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 to help resolve water

disputes between Canada and the United States. In a report re-

leased in 2000, the IJC acknowledged the diversion anxiety in the

Great Lakes region, but after extensive study it declared that “the

era of major diversions and water transfers in the United States and

Canada has ended.”

30

v

To H a v e a n d H a v e N o t

11


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
00027, 8c3ce71b87fef1946c64110c24d3b714
00027, 9e34059aaba8d48468bc425fdf48dfeb
00027, 6639c3f35845919302d36e30672c9117
CCF20080107 00027
CCF20101027 00027
00027, 65f9600afa1b70ca3ff44baf83e1f028
00027, fac29cf9dfe73ba8931daa2dfdb6d777
CCF20091215 00027
00027, 8c3ce71b87fef1946c64110c24d3b714
CCF20130417 00027
00027, fac29cf9dfe73ba8931daa2dfdb6d777
00027, f7260257fd7dc2c3fdf4abd42f66acd1
00027, 006f6504962fa3be7fb1e6ad671ec53a
00027, 1d5d1f39b3e8f1817a9d67408c0b6423
CCF20091215 00027
00027, 85352755906ad672440896119fe9608f
CCF20101027 00027
00027, 2446198a8c3aa6b9c70821bc3de139f0
CCF20080107 00027

więcej podobnych podstron