Introduction to Linguistics
Derivational Morphology
Inflection vs. Derivation
Inflection
linguistic means of
indicating grammatical
information
Derivation
linguistic means of
creating new lexical
elements in the
language
Inflection vs. Derivation
Consider the following groups of words. In which of
these do you observe the following:
-additional of grammatical information
-addition of lexical information
- change of meaning
-change of the lexical category
A
B
lady → ladies
lady →
ladylike
compute → computed
compute →
computer
wise → wiser
wise –>
wisely
dog → dogs
dog →
doggy
Inflectional morphemes vs. Derivational
morphemes
Inflectional morphemes
carry grammatical
information
do not create new
meaning when they attach
to a base
their attachment does not
result in creating a unit
that belongs to a category
different than the category
of the base
attach after the
derivational morphemes
Derivational morphemes
carry lexical information
create new meaning when
they attach to a base
their attachment may
result in creating a unit
that belongs to a category
different than the
category of the base
attach before inflectional
morphemes
Productivity and Blocking
Productivity
Probability of being a
word from speaker's
active vocabulary
Blocking
Non-occurrence of one
form due to simple
existence of another
Structure of complex words: roots, bases and
stems
Consider the word
INDECIPHERABILITY
Let's divide into moprhs.
Structure of complex words: roots, bases and
stems
IN – DE – CIPHER – ABIL – ITY
Which of these morphs carry the essential (basic)
meaning?
Structure of complex words: roots, bases and
stems
The morph that carries the basic meaning is
-CIPHER-
As far as the structure of complex words is
concerned, we will call such morphs the ROOTS
In INDECIPHERABILITY the morph -CIPHER- is the
root
Structure of complex words: roots and bases
Roots can combine with derivational affixes and
inflectional affixes
When a root serves as the element to which a
derivational affix attaches then we call it the BASE
for that affix.
e.g. DECIPHER
DE + CIPHER
affix + root (in DECIPHER) and BASE (for DE-)
Structure of complex words: roots and bases
BASES can be complex units and be contained in
each other.
Consider
DECIPHERABLE
DE-CIPHER-ABLE
DE + CIPHER
affix + root (in DECIPHER) and BASE (for DE-)
DECIPHER + ABLE
base + suffix
Structure of complex words: stems
When a root or a base serves as the element to which
an inflectional morph attaches we call it a STEM
DOGS = DOG + S
stem + suffix
Structure of complex words: tree structure
N
cipher [ROOT]
Structure of complex words: tree structure
V
de- N [BASE] for DE-
cipher [ROOT]
Structure of complex words: tree structure
A
V [BASE] for -ABLE -able
de- N [BASE] for DE-
cipher [ROOT]
Structure of complex words: tree structure
A
in- A [BASE] for IN-
V [BASE] for -ABLE -able
de- N [BASE] for DE-
-cipher- [ROOT]
Structure of complex words: tree structure
N
-ity
A [BASE] for -ITY
in- A [BASE] for IN-
V [BASE] for -ABLE -able
de- N [BASE] for DE-
cipher [ROOT]
Structure of complex words
The structure of a complex word has its internal
structure which is not random.
This structure is hierarchical
Each level in the structure is created with respect to
the constraints on affixation.
Structure of complex words: constraints on
affixation
Consider the following pairs:
broad → broaden
white → whiten
dark → darken
beautiful → *beautifullen
Why can have the first three and cannot have the last
one?
Structure of complex words: constraints on
affixation
The fact that we can create pairs such as:
broad → broaden
white → whiten
dark → darken
But we cannot create pair such as beautiful →
*beautifulen is connected with the phonological shape
of the base to which a given suffix is to attach.
BROAD, WHITE and DARK are monosyllabic (they are
built from one syllable). BEAUTIFUL is polysyllabic (it
is composed of more than one syllable)
Suffix -en attaches only to monosyllabic adjectives
Structure of complex words: constraints on
affixation
Now, consider the paris such as those below.
(to) apply → reapply
(to) do → redo
(to) connect → reconnect
a child → *a rechild
a computer → *a recomputer
long → *relong
barbarous → *rebarbarous
Why can we REAPPLY, REDO and RECONNECT but
we cannot create *RECHILD, *RELONG,
*REBARBAROUS, and *RECOMPUTER?
Structure of complex words: constraints on
affixation
We can create REAPPLY, REDO and RECONNECT
but we cannot create *RECHILD, *RELONG,
*REBARBAROUS, and *RECOMPUTER because
RE- attaches only to verbs
The attachment of RE- illustrates another constraint.
We may call this the requirement that the base needs
to be of a proper lexical category
Structure of complex words: constraints on
affixation
Now, consider the following two groups of words.
Why does the suffix -ANT attach to the base in A but
to those in B?
A
B
dependant
*bulidant
defendant
*teachant
assistant
*wit(e)ant
inhabitant
*singant
Structure of complex words: constraints on
affixation
The attachment of the suffix -ANT is regulated by the
origin of the base.
-ANT can attach to bases of Latinate origin (group A)
but it cannot be attached to bases of Germanic
descent (group B)
The origin of the base illustrates the third constraint
on affixation.
Exercise
Draw tree structures of the following words. Mind
the right order of the attachment of affixes.
disappearance
impersonal
oversimplification
misunderstandable
inconclusive
manliness
Remaining word-formation processes
Consider the following words
airplane
deathblow
lipstick
Wortbedeutungslehre [word+meaning+theory] =
semantics (Ger)
These words were formed by a process known as
COMPUNGING by which two or more free roots and
associated affixes are combined together.
Remaining word-formation processes
Consider the words such as:
papa, zigzag, ping-pong or goody-goody
These words are formed by doubling the entire word
or the initial syllable with our without phonological
change. This process of doubling a word or the initial
syllable to create a new word is known as
REDUPLICATION.
Remaining word-formation processes
Now, consider these:
smog < sm(oke) + (f)og
motel < mo(tor) + (ho)tel
sprig < spr(ay) + (tw)ig
twirl < tw(ist) + (wh)ril
In these words two free roots are combined together
and the end of the first root and the beginning of the
second root are clipped.
The process by which these words were created is
known as BLENDING
Remaining word-formation processes
Consider the words in group A. These words were
created from words in group B by removing the
supposed derivational suffix on the basis of
overextension of derivational and inflectional patterns in
English. This process of word formation is known as
BACK FORMATION
A B
Self-destruct
self-destruction
resurrect resurrection
(to) emote emotion
transcript transcription
Remaining word-formation processes
Verb
Noun
con’duct
‘conduct
re’bel ‘rebel
per’mit
‘permit
re’cord
‘record
ob’ject
‘object
In all of the examples above, we can observe the
change in lexical category and meaning without the
addition of any derivational morphemes. Such
process of word formation is known as CONVERSION
or FUNCTIONAL SHIFT or ZERO DERIVATION.
Remaining word-formation processes
Clipping
A process by which we cut off the beginning, the
ending or both the beginning and the ending of the
word.
rehabilitation > rehab
facsimile > fax
fanatic > fan
Remaining word-formation processes
ACCRONIMIZATION is a type of shortening by which
only the initial letters of the root are left out. These
letter are then pronounced as a single word.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization > NATO
acquired immune deficiency syndrome > AIDS
radio detecting and ranging > radar
Durability, Reliability and Excellence > Durex
Remaining word-formation processes
NITIALISM is a type of shortening by which only the
initial letters of the roots are left out and theses
letters are then pronounced separately e.g.
compact disc > CD
Anno Domini > A.D.
before Christ > B.C.
id est > i.e.