Derivational Morphology

background image

Introduction to Linguistics

Derivational Morphology

background image

Inflection vs. Derivation

Inflection

linguistic means of

indicating grammatical

information

Derivation

linguistic means of

creating new lexical

elements in the

language

background image

Inflection vs. Derivation

Consider the following groups of words. In which of

these do you observe the following:

-additional of grammatical information

-addition of lexical information

- change of meaning

-change of the lexical category

A

B

lady → ladies

lady →

ladylike

compute → computed

compute →

computer

wise → wiser

wise –>

wisely

dog → dogs

dog →

doggy

background image

Inflectional morphemes vs. Derivational

morphemes

Inflectional morphemes

carry grammatical

information

do not create new

meaning when they attach

to a base

their attachment does not

result in creating a unit

that belongs to a category

different than the category

of the base

attach after the

derivational morphemes

Derivational morphemes

carry lexical information

create new meaning when

they attach to a base

their attachment may

result in creating a unit

that belongs to a category

different than the

category of the base

attach before inflectional

morphemes

background image

Productivity and Blocking

Productivity

Probability of being a

word from speaker's

active vocabulary

Blocking

Non-occurrence of one

form due to simple

existence of another

background image

Structure of complex words: roots, bases and

stems

Consider the word

INDECIPHERABILITY

Let's divide into moprhs.

background image

Structure of complex words: roots, bases and

stems

IN – DE – CIPHER – ABIL – ITY

Which of these morphs carry the essential (basic)

meaning?

background image

Structure of complex words: roots, bases and

stems

The morph that carries the basic meaning is

-CIPHER-

As far as the structure of complex words is

concerned, we will call such morphs the ROOTS

In INDECIPHERABILITY the morph -CIPHER- is the

root

background image

Structure of complex words: roots and bases

Roots can combine with derivational affixes and

inflectional affixes

When a root serves as the element to which a

derivational affix attaches then we call it the BASE

for that affix.

e.g. DECIPHER

DE + CIPHER

affix + root (in DECIPHER) and BASE (for DE-)

background image

Structure of complex words: roots and bases

BASES can be complex units and be contained in

each other.

Consider

DECIPHERABLE

DE-CIPHER-ABLE

DE + CIPHER

affix + root (in DECIPHER) and BASE (for DE-)

DECIPHER + ABLE

base + suffix

background image

Structure of complex words: stems

When a root or a base serves as the element to which

an inflectional morph attaches we call it a STEM

DOGS = DOG + S

stem + suffix

background image

Structure of complex words: tree structure

N

cipher [ROOT]

background image

Structure of complex words: tree structure

V

de- N [BASE] for DE-

cipher [ROOT]

background image

Structure of complex words: tree structure

A

V [BASE] for -ABLE -able

de- N [BASE] for DE-

cipher [ROOT]

background image

Structure of complex words: tree structure

A

in- A [BASE] for IN-

V [BASE] for -ABLE -able

de- N [BASE] for DE-

-cipher- [ROOT]

background image

Structure of complex words: tree structure

N

-ity

A [BASE] for -ITY

in- A [BASE] for IN-

V [BASE] for -ABLE -able

de- N [BASE] for DE-

cipher [ROOT]

background image

Structure of complex words

The structure of a complex word has its internal

structure which is not random.

This structure is hierarchical

Each level in the structure is created with respect to

the constraints on affixation.

background image

Structure of complex words: constraints on

affixation

Consider the following pairs:

broad → broaden

white → whiten

dark → darken

beautiful → *beautifullen

Why can have the first three and cannot have the last

one?

background image

Structure of complex words: constraints on

affixation

The fact that we can create pairs such as:

broad → broaden

white → whiten

dark → darken

But we cannot create pair such as beautiful →

*beautifulen is connected with the phonological shape

of the base to which a given suffix is to attach.

BROAD, WHITE and DARK are monosyllabic (they are

built from one syllable). BEAUTIFUL is polysyllabic (it

is composed of more than one syllable)

Suffix -en attaches only to monosyllabic adjectives

background image

Structure of complex words: constraints on

affixation

Now, consider the paris such as those below.

(to) apply → reapply

(to) do → redo

(to) connect → reconnect

a child → *a rechild

a computer → *a recomputer

long → *relong

barbarous → *rebarbarous

Why can we REAPPLY, REDO and RECONNECT but

we cannot create *RECHILD, *RELONG,

*REBARBAROUS, and *RECOMPUTER?

background image

Structure of complex words: constraints on

affixation

We can create REAPPLY, REDO and RECONNECT

but we cannot create *RECHILD, *RELONG,

*REBARBAROUS, and *RECOMPUTER because

RE- attaches only to verbs

The attachment of RE- illustrates another constraint.

We may call this the requirement that the base needs

to be of a proper lexical category

background image

Structure of complex words: constraints on

affixation

Now, consider the following two groups of words.

Why does the suffix -ANT attach to the base in A but

to those in B?

A

B

dependant

*bulidant

defendant

*teachant

assistant

*wit(e)ant

inhabitant

*singant

background image

Structure of complex words: constraints on

affixation

The attachment of the suffix -ANT is regulated by the

origin of the base.

-ANT can attach to bases of Latinate origin (group A)

but it cannot be attached to bases of Germanic

descent (group B)

The origin of the base illustrates the third constraint

on affixation.

background image

Exercise

Draw tree structures of the following words. Mind

the right order of the attachment of affixes.

disappearance

impersonal

oversimplification

misunderstandable

inconclusive

manliness

background image

Remaining word-formation processes

Consider the following words

airplane

deathblow

lipstick

Wortbedeutungslehre [word+meaning+theory] =

semantics (Ger)

These words were formed by a process known as

COMPUNGING by which two or more free roots and

associated affixes are combined together.

background image

Remaining word-formation processes

Consider the words such as:

papa, zigzag, ping-pong or goody-goody

These words are formed by doubling the entire word

or the initial syllable with our without phonological

change. This process of doubling a word or the initial

syllable to create a new word is known as

REDUPLICATION.

background image

Remaining word-formation processes

Now, consider these:

smog < sm(oke) + (f)og

motel < mo(tor) + (ho)tel

sprig < spr(ay) + (tw)ig

twirl < tw(ist) + (wh)ril

In these words two free roots are combined together

and the end of the first root and the beginning of the

second root are clipped.

The process by which these words were created is

known as BLENDING

background image

Remaining word-formation processes

Consider the words in group A. These words were

created from words in group B by removing the

supposed derivational suffix on the basis of

overextension of derivational and inflectional patterns in

English. This process of word formation is known as

BACK FORMATION

A B

Self-destruct

self-destruction

resurrect resurrection

(to) emote emotion

transcript transcription

background image

Remaining word-formation processes

Verb

Noun

con’duct

‘conduct

re’bel ‘rebel

per’mit

‘permit

re’cord

‘record

ob’ject

‘object

In all of the examples above, we can observe the

change in lexical category and meaning without the

addition of any derivational morphemes. Such

process of word formation is known as CONVERSION

or FUNCTIONAL SHIFT or ZERO DERIVATION.

background image

Remaining word-formation processes

Clipping

A process by which we cut off the beginning, the

ending or both the beginning and the ending of the

word.

rehabilitation > rehab

facsimile > fax

fanatic > fan

background image

Remaining word-formation processes

ACCRONIMIZATION is a type of shortening by which

only the initial letters of the root are left out. These

letter are then pronounced as a single word.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization > NATO

acquired immune deficiency syndrome > AIDS

radio detecting and ranging > radar

Durability, Reliability and Excellence > Durex

background image

Remaining word-formation processes

NITIALISM is a type of shortening by which only the

initial letters of the roots are left out and theses

letters are then pronounced separately e.g.

compact disc > CD

Anno Domini > A.D.

before Christ > B.C.

id est > i.e.


Document Outline


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
derivation flow equation prof J Kleppe
Lecture VIII Morphology
Exercises in morphology, part 3
[38]QUERCETIN AND ITS DERIVATIVES CHEMICAL STRUCTURE AND BIOACTIVITY – A REVIEW
lit morphologie, languages, Filologia Angielska, linguistics
Syzmanek, Introduction to Morphological Analysis
Einfuhrung in die Linguistik des Deustchen Morphologie
CALC1 L 4 Derivatives
ITL Morphology “Word Classes and Affixes
morpholine eros rm290
extraction and analysis of indole derivatives from fungal biomass Journal of Basic Microbiology 34 (
Morphology exercises (2)
MORPHOLOGICAL STUDIES IN TWO CASES EXAMINED AT NECROPSY
morphology
MorphoTyp
Morphology
ENG POL VERB morphology TABLE
Klassifizierung?r Verben nach morphologischen Kriterien
DERIVAZIONE, język włoski nauka

więcej podobnych podstron