Dignities and Debilities as Collected from a Variety of Sources
Compiled by Robert Hand
Introductory Comments
The following is an attempt to collect and organize scoring and weighting systems for both
accidental and essential dignities from a variety of sources. While most authorities seem to agree concerning the essential dignities (namely, that planets in domicile get 5 points, in exaltation get 4, triplicity 3, bound or term 2, and face 1), there was a wide variety of systems for scoring the accidental dignities and debilities. What may surprise some readers is the complexity of these systems and detail into which they go. Readers familiar with Jyotish will also discover that in the Western tradition, contrary to widespread belief, there is a system corresponding to Shad Bala, the system use in Hindu astrology to measure a planet's strength.
However, I believe a caution is in order. Both Shad Bala and the system described here suffer from the same basic fault, a tendency to combine apples and oranges. We do not find any weighting system at all in the oldest surviving Greek texts. So far in the Arabic Era texts we have found only systems for weighting the essential dignities but none for the accidental dignities. This is also true in Hindu astrology. What scholars believe to be the oldest Hindu texts discuss each of the Balas as being a different kind of strength with a different facet of the planet's energy being strengthened or weakened. The same appears to be true of the Greek and Arabic Era texts.
The basic problem is that astrology has never explicitly (in written works at least) set forth the principles that make up each planetary energy that can be strengthened or weakened by placement in a sign or because of a planet's placement with respect to the houses or other planets. The nearest thing to this is to be found in Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos where he discusses the planetary virtues with respect to Hot, Cold, Wet, and Dry. Otherwise we do not really know what it means when we say that a planet is strong or weak. Is the strength that Saturn gets by being conjunct the Ascendant the same kind of strength that it gets by being in Capricorn, Aquarius, or Libra? I think that most would agree that these are not the same kind of strengths, but I also think that few of us could pin down exactly what the differences are.
Therefore, I offer the following with the strong recommendation that what I have said be taken into consideration as the reader studies the systems presented here.
Dignities and Debilities Weighting Systems from Various Sources
Essential Dignities
* Note: Mutual receptions by these three dignities are generally recognized as real, but they are usually not scored. Schoener, Abu Ma`shar, and Ibn Ezra (among many others) score them if any two of the are operative with the same pair of planets. They do not say what the score would be, be we operate on the assumption that the score would be the sum of the scores that the planets would have being in their own dignities of the same type. Therefore triplicity + bound = 5, triplicity + face = 4, bound + face = 3. It does seem that any of these lower level mutual receptions should cancel peregrine without their having to be two of them involving the same pair of planets. But this is not stated anywhere that I know of.
Essential Debilities
† Note: All references to Montulmo are as attributed to him by Schoener. We have not found any evidence of these scoring methods actually in Montulmo.
Accidental Dignities and Debilities
I. Dignities and Debilities Arising from House Placement
|
Lilly |
Montulmo |
Schoener |
Ibn Ezra |
Wilson |
1st |
5 |
5 |
11 |
12 |
5 |
Schoener and Ibn Ezra use similar systems which have no debility, only less dignity. Lilly, Wilson, and Montulmo have both positive and negative scores. Given this fact their ranges of values are quite similar but there is much disagreement on the relative ranking of the houses. Schoener is unique in granting the tenth house more than the first. The other all make the first house either greater to or equal to the tenth. There is also disagreement about whether the sixth or the twelfth is the worst house, and Montulmo ranks the second as being one of the worse houses.
II. Dignities and Debilities Arising from Planetary Motion
|
Lilly |
Montulmo |
Wilson |
Direct |
4 |
4 |
4 |
Schoener and Ibn Ezra recognize these as dignities and debilities but do not assign explicit scores to them. It should probably be assumed that they all have weights of +1 or -1, if weighting is appropriate at all.
III. Relation of Planet to Sun
|
Lilly |
Montulmo |
Wilson |
Cazimi |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Schoener and Ibn Ezra also recognize these as dignities and debilities but do not assign explicit scores to them. It should probably be assumed that they all have weights of +1 or -1, if weighting is appropriate at all.
IV. Aspects and Other Relations to Other Planets and Fixed Stars
|
Lilly |
Montulmo |
Wilson |
Besieged by Benefics |
0 |
5 |
6 |
* Montulmo asks for applying aspects while the English ask for partile aspects. Otherwise the dignities are the same.
† The English specify certain stars while Montulmo designates the class of the star only.
Schoener and Ibn Ezra also recognize these as dignities and debilities but do not assign explicit scores to them. It should probably be assumed that they all have weights of +1 or -1, if weighting is appropriate at all.
V. Dignities and Debilities Due to Sect, and Masculine Feminine (Except Degrees).
|
Lilly |
Montulmo |
Wilson |
Conformity of Quadrant |
0 |
2 |
0 |
VI. Miscellaneous
|
Lilly |
Montulmo |
Wilson |
Sign of Planet's Joy, Throne |
0 |
3 |
0 |
Dignities and Debilities of the Part of Fortune
I. Dignities and Debilities from House Placement. |
|
In the 1st or 10th House |
5 |
II. Dignities and Debilities from Sign Placement. |
|
In Taurus or Pisces |
5 |
III. Relation to the Sun |
|
Not Combust |
5 |
IV. Aspect and Relationships to Planets and Fixed Stars |
|
Conjunction with Regulus (Alpha Leonis) |
6 |
V, Miscellaneous |
|
In the Bounds of Jupiter or Venus |
2 |