35
Amharic
Grover Hudson
1 History and Society
Amharic is the second most populous Semitic language, after Arabic, with some 20 million
speakers (16 million of the 1994 Ethiopian census + expected growth rate to 2009).
Amharic has long been the lingua franca of Ethiopia, and, despite recent movement
toward local-language primary education, in most schools still the language of instruc-
tion in the early grades. (Since the late 1940s, English has been the language of sec-
ondary and higher education.) It is recognised in the 1994 constitution as the
‘working
language
’ of Ethiopian government.
Amharic is spoken as a second language by additional millions of Ethiopian urban
dwellers, and Amharic readers certainly represent the large majority of the reported
Ethiopian literacy rate of 42 per cent.
The internal grouping of Semitic languages is controversial, but three branches are
usually mentioned: northeast, northwest and south. Northwest includes Arabic, Hebrew
and Aramaic; northeast anciently known and long extinct Akkadian-Babylonian; and
southern Semitic the ancient and modern languages native to South Arabia plus
those of Ethiopia and Eritrea, of which there are some thirteen: Tigre and Tigrinya of
Eritrea, with Tigrinya also spoken by some 3.5 million in Ethiopia; in Ethiopia are
Amharic, Soddo (also known as Kistane), Mesqan, Chaha with several named dialects;
Inor also with several named dialects, Argobba a language not quite mutually intelli-
gible with Amharic, Harari (Adare), Silt
’e with several named dialects, and Zay.
Ethiopian Semitic Gafat has been extinct for some decades, and Ge
‘ez, for which there
are epigraphic records dating from perhaps 2500
BP
, survives as the liturgical language
of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church. Ge
‘ez seems not to be the ancestor of any modern
language.
The traditional home of Amharic is mountainous north-central Ethiopia, and Amharic
dialects are recognised in the regions of Begemder, Gojjam, Menz-Wello and Shoa.
These differ by features of pronunciation and grammatical morphology. The Ethiopian
capital city Addis Ababa, Shoa, is the centre of Ethiopian political, economic and social
life, and the Amharic variety of Addis Ababa has become recognised as prestigious.
594
There are Amharic manuscripts from the fourteenth century, and modern writings
and publication in Amharic include poetry, newspapers, literary and news magazines,
drama, novels, history, textbooks, etc. Amharic language magazines are published in
Europe and the US to serve the now considerable Ethiopian expatriate populations
there.
Amharic has borrowed words from Arabic, French, Italian, and now especially English,
but these are not prominent. Ge
‘ez is favoured as a source for new word invention.
Because other anciently known Semitic languages notably Arabic, Aramaic, Hebrew,
and Akkadian are all in the Middle East, and because there is evidence of South Arabian
presence in northeast Africa from perhaps as early as 2500
BP
, it is generally believed
that Semitic languages were brought into northeast Africa in near historic time by migra-
tions from South Arabia. However, because Semitic is only one of six branches in the
family of Afroasiatic languages, and because Africa is home to the
five non-Semitic
groups Chadic (West Africa), Berber (North Africa), Egyptian (Egypt), Omotic (Ethiopia
and eastern Sudan) and Cushitic (centred in Ethiopia), and because ancient Ethiopian
Semitic culture and the modern languages have many features not descendant from
those of South Arabia, it is also possible that Semitic origins are African and perhaps
Ethiopian.
Ethiopian Semitic, Cushitic and Omotic languages have certainly coexisted in Ethiopia
for at least two thousand years, and probably for this reason share numerous features of
an Ethiopian language type characterised by phonological, morphological and syntactic
features including glottalised ejective consonants, a special non-
finite verb for verb
sequences, verb idioms based on the verb
‘say’, and word-order characteristics of verb-
final (SOV) languages. Many Semitic languages, indeed, are verb-initial (VSO) lan-
guages, including ancient Ethiopian Semitic Ge
‘ez, but Amharic and the other modern
Ethiopian Semitic languages have some characteristics of both SOV and VSO types
(notably VSO-type prepositions), which suggests that they have changed this aspect of
their grammars under the in
fluence of Cushitic and Omotic neighbours. Similarly, most
Middle Eastern Semitic languages lack the Ethiopian areal feature of glottalised ejective
consonants. In this case, however, the presence of glottalised ejectives in Chadic, South
Arabian Semitic and some Arabic dialects suggests that in this characteristic Amharic
and Ethiopian Semitic languages preserve the original Afroasiatic type.
2 Phonology
2.1 Consonants
Amharic has the thirty-one consonant phonemes of Table 35.1, where phonetic symbols
have International Phonetic Association (IPA) values except that y = palatal glide j, c
ˇ
and
˚ˇ
= alveopalatal affricates
ʧ
and
ʤ
;
š and ž = alveopalatal fricatives
ʃ
and
Z
; n
ˇ =
palatal nasal
ɲ
; and r is a tap and long r (rr) a trill.
The series of labialised
‘velars’ k
w
, g
w
, k
w
’, and h
w
(h
w
historically a velar < x
w
)
might be considered sequences of consonant + w (which do arise in word-formation),
but three facts suggest that these are best considered to be functionally unitary: (1) the
consonant and w are never separated by vowels in word-formation processes as are
root-consonant sequences; (2) they freely occur at the beginning of words where other
AMHARIC
595
consonant sequences are absent or rare; and (3) they have special forms in the Amharic
writing system.
Labials p, p
’ and v are rare: p and p’ only in loanwords some of which like ityopp’
ɑ
‘Ethiopia’ < Greek are long established in the language, and the voiced labiodental
fricative v is only in recent borrowings such as volibol
‘volleyball’.
Consonant sequences are at most two; at the beginning of words these consist of
C+r/l as in gr
ɑ ‘left’ and blen ‘pupil of eye’, though these may also be considered gi-rɑ
and bi-len. The glottal stop
?
and labialised consonants do not occur at the end of syl-
lables (or, thus, words), and the alveopalatal nasal n
ˇ does not occur at the beginning of
native words. The glottal stop may be considered an allophonic effect of syllable-initial
vowels, as in [
?]ityopp’y
ɑ ‘Ethiopia’, s
@
[
?]
ɑt ‘hour, clock/watch’. Glottalised ejective s’
is replaced by t
’ in rural speech, and the voiced alveopalatals ž and
˚ˇ
are free or idio-
lectal variants. Voiceless released stops are slightly aspirated. The nongeminate voiced
labial and velar stops b and g are spirants [
b] and [
Ɣ
] between vowels, as in le[
b]
ɑ
‘thief’, w
ɑ[
Ɣ
]
ɑ ‘price’. The sequences k
w
’
@
and k
w
’i- vary as k’o and k’u, respectively, as
in k
w
’
@
ss
@
l
@
~k
w
’oss
@
l
@
‘he was wounded’, k
w
’i-t’i-r~k’ut’i-r ‘number’. The velar and labial
stops tend to be labialised before round vowels, e.g. b
w
ot
ɑ ‘place’, k’
w
um
‘stop/stand!’.
Between vowels the glides w, y are very lax (h
ɑyɑ [hɑ
y
ɑ] ‘twenty’). In northern dialects
except of Gondar there is palatalisation of obstruents as glide insertion before the front
vowels i and e, which vowels may in this case be centralised, thus bet > b
y
et ‘house’
and hid > h
y
i-d
‘go (Sg.2m.)!’ In the Menz dialect velars k and k’ are replaced by cˇ and
c
ˇ’ respectively before i and e.
Except for h and
?
, consonants may be long between vowels and at the end of words.
The long consonants are usually written here as sequences of like consonants, and
the glottalised consonants as CC
’ not C’C’. Grammatically significant length may be
Table 35.1 Consonants
Labial
Alveolar
Alveopalatal
Velar
Glottal
Stops
vls
p
t
k, k
w
?
vd
b
d
g, g
w
gl
p
’
t
’
k
’, k
w
’
Affricates
vl
c
ˇ
vd
˚ˇ
gl
c
ˇ’
Fricatives
vl
f
s
š
h, h
w
vd
z
ž
gl
s
’
Nasals
m
n
n
ˇ
Lateral
l
Rhotic
r
Glides
w*
y
Notes: vl = voiceless, vd=voiced; gl=glottalized.
* Has also velar articulation.
AMHARIC
596
written C:, for example t: in m
@
t:
ɑ ‘he hit’, to emphasise that length in this case is a
function of the past conjugation and not a lexical characteristic of the verb
‘hit’.
When followed by the suf
fix -i (instrumental, agentive, Sg.2f. subject) and -e of
the Sg.1 conjunct, alveolar consonants except r are replaced by corresponding alveo-
palatals: t > c
ˇ, d >
˚ˇ
, s
’ and t’ > cˇ’, s > š, z > ž (optionally ž >
˚ˇ
), n > n
ˇ, and, except in
the Menz dialect, l > y. For example, ti-m
@
t-i > ti-m
@
c
ˇ(i) ‘you (Sg.f.) hit’, hid-i > hi
˚ˇ
(i)
‘Go
(Sg.2f.)!
’, yi-z-:e > yi-ž:e ‘I holding’. The suffix -i may be absent with these replacements.
(Sg.1 possessive -e does not have these palatalisations: bet-e
‘my house’.)
2.2 Vowels
Amharic has the seven vowels of Table 35.2, in which phonetic symbols have International
Phonetic Association values (much writing on Amharic has
ɑ
¨
and
@
respectively for
@
and i-). Mid-front e has a variant e after h as in h[
e]d
@
‘he went’. Words begin and end
in any of the vowels except that i- does not occur at the end of words except in the archaic
question suf
fix -ni-, nor
@
at the beginning of words except in the interjection
@
r
@
‘Really?’
Non-low central vowels i- and
@
are usually elided by adjacent vowels, and i- is elided
by
@
, for example b
@
-
ɑncˇi > bɑncˇi ‘by you (Sg.2f.)’ and b
@
-i-rgi-t
’ > b
@
rgi-t
’ ‘truly’ (lit. ‘in
truth
’). A sequence of like vowels is reduced to one:
ɑsrɑ-ɑnd > ɑsrɑnd ‘eleven’, yi-b
@
l
ɑ-ɑl
> yi-b
@
l
ɑl ‘he eats’.
The high central vowel i- is usually considered to be inserted (epenthesised) to sepa-
rate disallowed consonant sequences which frequently arise in word-formation, as in
y-w
@
sd-h > yi-w
@
sdi-h
‘he takes you (Sg.m.)’; most occurrences of this vowel may be
considered to be epenthetic.
Sg.2f. and Pl.3 verb-subject suf
fixes -i and -u may be replaced by y and w respec-
tively when followed by
ɑ: ti-n
@
gri-
ɑlli-š > ti-n
@
gry
ɑlli-š ‘you (Sg.f.) tell’, n
@
gg
@
r-u-
ɑt >
n
@
gg
@
rw
ɑt ‘they told her’; alternatively y/w may be inserted in these cases: ti-n
@
griy
ɑlli-š,
n
@
gg
@
ruw
ɑt. Oppositely, the Sg.3m. and Pl.3 verb-subject prefix y- is replaced by i
when it follows a consonant, as in s-y-hed > sihed
‘when he goes’.
2.3 Stress
Stress is not prominent in Amharic. Suf
fixes except the plural suffix are unstressed,
and, generally, stress is on a
final closed syllable of a stem and otherwise next to last:
m
@
skót
‘window’, mı´s
ɑ ‘lunch’, mı´sɑ-e ‘my lunch’, m
@
skót-óc
ˇcˇ ‘windows’. But stress is
advanced to the vowel before a grammatically long consonant, as in k
@
´ bb
@
d
@
‘he
broke
’, where the long consonant is a grammatical characteristic of the past tense; cf.
k
@
bb
@
´ d
@
, a male name, with next-to-last syllable stress.
Table 35.2 Vowels
Front
Central
Back
High
i
i-
u
Mid
e
@
o
Low
ɑ
AMHARIC
597
3 Morphology
3.1 Pronouns
There are three pronoun sets (not including verb subject agreements), presented in
Table 35.3: independent, object suf
fix and possessive suffix pronouns. Object pronouns
are shown suf
fixed to the verb n
@
gg
@
r
@
‘he told’ and the possessive pronouns suffixed
to the noun bet
‘house’. Gender and politeness are distinguished in the Sg.2 and Sg.3
forms. Polite forms are for elders and adult unfamiliars.
Independent Sg.2pol.
ɑntu is common only in Wello and Gondar. The four pronouns
with i-ss each have alternate forms with i-rs: i-rs-u, i-rs-w
ɑ, i-rs-wo and i-rs-ɑcˇcˇ
@
w, re
flect-
ing the emphatic/re
flexive origin of these as possessive forms of *i-rs ‘head’ or *ki-rs
‘belly’. The Pl.2/3 independent forms reflect a plural morpheme i-nn
@
- (as in i-nn
@
-t
@
sf
ɑye
‘those associated with Tesfaye’) prefixed to the Sg.m. forms, respectively.
Pronouns are usually expressed by bound rather than independent forms, as verb subject,
object and noun possessor. The verb subject pronouns are presented with discussion of
verbs and conjugations, in Section 3.6 below.
The bound Sg.3m. object pronoun -w (Table 35.3) is replaced by -t after round
vowels as in n
@
gg
@
ru-t
‘they told him’ and n
@
gro-t
‘he, telling him’. The Sg.1, Sg.3m.
and Pl.1 object suf
fixes have an initial vowel
@
when they follow consonants other than
alveopalatals; thus n
@
gg
@
r-k-
@
n
ˇnˇ ‘you (Sg.m.) told me’ vs n
@
gg
@
r-
š-i-nˇnˇ ‘you (Sg.f.) told
me
’, and wi-s
@
d-
@
w
‘you (Sg.m.) take it/him!’ vs wi-s
@
˚ˇ
-i-w
‘you (Sg.f.) take it/him!’ The
object and possessive Pl.2, Pl.3, and possessive Pl.1 suf
fixes include a plural morpheme
-
ɑcˇcˇ probably cognate with the noun plural suffix -ocˇcˇ.
Two prepositions -bb-
‘at, on’ and -ll- ‘to, for’ are suffixed to verb stems and take
object suf
fixes as their objects, except that of Sg.3m. is -
@
t (not -
@
w) for example
f
@
rr
@
d
@
-bb-
@
n
ˇnˇ ‘he judged against me’, yi-f
@
rd-i-ll-
@
t
‘he judges for him’ (the i- is epen-
thetic). (When not suf
fixed to verb stems, prepositions accept independent pronouns as
their objects, as in b
@
ne (< b
@
-i-ne)
‘by/on me’, l
ɑncˇi (< l
@
-
ɑncˇi) ‘for you (Sg.f.)’.)
The bound Sg.3m. possessive pronoun -u
‘his’ is replaced by -w after vowels, for
example b
@
k
’lo-w ‘his mule’. The vowel i- of Sg.2m. and Sg.2f. possessive suffixes is
not epenthetic, as shown by the contrast of bet-i-
š ‘your (Sg.f.) house’ and mot-š ‘you
(Sg.f.) died
’, the latter with vowelless object -š and no epenthesis.
Table 35.3 Three pronoun sets
Independent
Verb object
Possessive
Sg.
1
i-ne
n
@
gg
@
r
@
-n
ˇnˇ
*
bet-e
**
2
m
ɑnt
@
n
@
gg
@
r
@
-h
bet-i-h
f
ɑncˇi
n
@
gg
@
r
@
-
š
bet-i-
š
pol
i-sswo ~
ɑntu
n
@
gg
@
r
@
-wo(t)
bet-wo
3
m
i-ssu
n
@
gg
@
r
@
-w
bet-u
f
i-ssw
ɑ ~ i-ss
w
ɑ
n
@
gg
@
r-
ɑt
bet-w
ɑ
pol
i-ss
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w
(=Pl.3)
(=Pl.3)
Pl.
1
i-n
ˇnˇ
ɑ
n
@
gg
@
r
@
-n
bet-
ɑcˇcˇi-n
2
i-nn
ɑnt
@
n
@
gg
@
r-
ɑcˇcˇi-hu
bet-
ɑcˇcˇi-hu
3
i-nn
@
ssu
n
@
gg
@
r-
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w
bet-
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w
Notes: * ‘He told me’; ** ‘my house’.
AMHARIC
598
Re
flexive-emphatic pronouns are formed as possessives of r
ɑs ‘head’, for example
r
ɑs-e ‘I myself’, rɑs-ɑcˇcˇi-n ‘we ourselves’ (i-ne rɑse m
@
tt
’
ɑhu ‘I myself came’).
Interrogative pronouns include m
ɑn ‘who’, mi-n ‘what’ (mi-ndi-r in mi-ndi-r n
@
w
(> mi-ndi-nn
@
w)
‘What is it?’), m
@
c
ˇe ‘when’, and y
@
t
‘where’. These are suffixed by -m
(-i-m with epenthesis) to provide negative inde
finite pronouns: m
ɑn-i-m ɑlm
@
tt
’
ɑm
‘nobody came’, y
@
t-i-m
ɑlhedi-m ‘I won’t go anywhere’. Other question words are
y
@
ti-n
ˇnˇ
ɑw ‘which’, si-nt ‘how much’, l
@
mi-n
‘why’ (lit. ‘for what’), i-nd
@
-mi-n
‘how’ (i-nd
@
‘like’), and i-ndet ‘how’ (< i-nd
@
-y
@
t
‘like where’).
3.2 Nouns
3.2.1 Gender
The gender of a noun is apparent in its choice of pronoun, agreement with the verb,
demonstrative, and de
finite article suffix. There is no neuter, and the feminine class is
mostly natural, except for a few inanimate nouns including the sun and moon, names of
countries, and small animals such as cats and mice, perhaps re
flecting a diminutive
usage of the feminine. Many feminine human nouns end in an archaic and non-productive
feminine t, including i-nn
ɑt ‘mother’, i-hi-t ‘sister’, ni-gi-st ‘queen’ (cf. ni-gus ‘king’), and a
few nouns have feminine suf
fix -it, including
ɑrogit ‘old woman’ (ɑroge ‘old’) and
ɑndit ‘a little one (f.)’ (ɑnd ‘one’) (this also in the fem. definite article -it-u).
3.2.2 Definiteness
De
finite common nouns have suffixes -u/-w (-w after vowels) for masc. and -w
ɑ or less
commonly -itu for fem. Masc. -u and -w
ɑ are identical to Sg.3m. possessives: wi-šɑ-w
‘the dog (m.)’ (or ‘his dog’), di-mm
@
t-w
ɑ ‘the cat (f.)’ (or ‘her cat’) or di-mm
@
t-itu
‘the
cat (f.)
’. The definite suffix is mutually exclusive with the possessives. Nouns s
@
w
‘man’ and set ‘woman’ have special definite-specific forms s
@
w-i-yye-w
‘the man’,
set-i-yyo-w
ɑ ‘the woman’.
3.2.3 Indefinite Article
The numeral
ɑnd ‘one’ functions as an indefinite-specific article, as in ɑnd bet t
@
k
’
ɑtt’
@
l
@
‘a (certain) house burned down’. Repetition of
ɑnd expresses plural indefinite ‘some,
various, a few
’:
ɑndɑnd bet t
@
k
’
ɑtt’
@
l
@
‘a few houses burned down.’
3.2.4 Plurality
The regular noun plural suf
fix is -ocˇcˇ: bet-ocˇcˇ ‘houses’, s
@
w-oc
ˇcˇ ‘people’. After nouns
ending in i or e, y may be inserted: g
@
b
@
re-yoc
ˇcˇ ‘farmers’ (or reflecting o of the suffix,
g
@
b
@
re-woc
ˇcˇ), and w after u and o; b
@
k
’lo-wocˇcˇ ‘mules’. Suffix o may elide the noun-
final vowel: m
@
kin
ɑ-ocˇcˇ > m
@
kinoc
ˇcˇ ‘cars’, b
@
k
’lo-ocˇcˇ > b
@
k
’locˇcˇ ‘mules’. There are
some irregular plurals in -
ɑt and -ɑn, probably Ge‘ez or pseudo-Ge‘ez formations,
including k
’
ɑl-ɑt ‘words’ and k’i-ddus-ɑn ‘saints’. With plural quantifiers, the plural
suf
fix may be absent: bi-zu s
@
w
‘many people’, hul
@
t li-
˚ˇ
‘two children’. Adjectives (see
below) may also be pluralised. Other suf
fixes attach to the plural: bet-ocˇcˇ-u ‘the
houses
’, bet-ocˇcˇ-
ɑcˇcˇi-n ‘our houses’.
AMHARIC
599
3.2.5 Genitive
Possessive or genitive nouns and pronouns are pre
fixed by y
@
-: y
@
-ssu bet
‘his house’,
y
@
-k
@
t
@
m
ɑ li-
˚ˇ
‘a town boy’, y
@
-bet k
’ulf ‘lock of a house/house lock’. This prefix is
absent following another pre
fix: l
@
-ssu bet
‘for his house’. Familiar such relations may
be expressed by simple juxtaposition, as in t
@
m
ɑri bet ‘school house’. This prefix also
marks relative clauses (see below).
3.2.6 Definite object
De
finite objects of verbs (also indefinites sometimes in older writing), are suffixed by
-n: bet-u-n w
@
dd
@
d
@
‘he liked the house’,
ɑbbɑt-e-n ɑyy
@
-hu
‘I told my father’. Definite
objects optionally and typically topicalised de
finite objects, which precede the sentence
subject, are marked as
‘resumptive’ verb-object pronouns, as in leb
ɑ-w-n polis-ocˇcˇu
y
ɑzzu-t ‘policemen caught the thief’ (-t ‘him’).
3.2.7 Topicaliser
Nouns raised as topics, including those contrasted with others, are suf
fixed by m, as in
t
’w
ɑt yohɑnni-s-i-m d
@
ww
@
l
@
-n
ˇnˇ ‘in the morning YOHANNIS called me’, and yoh
ɑnni-s-i-m
yi-m
@
t
’
ɑl ‘As for Yohannis, he will come’ or ‘Yohannis will come too’. In questions an
equivalent morpheme is -ss:
ɑnt
@
-ss?
‘What about you (Sg.m.)?’ (This suffix is histori-
cally mm, but the length is now rarely heard. A cognate suf
fix has become obligatory
on negative main verbs.)
3.2.8 Derived Nouns
There are a number of ways to derive nouns from verbs and other nouns. An instru-
ment or location is formed on the verb in
finitive by suffixing -iy
ɑ: m
@
t
’r
@
g-iy
ɑ ‘broom’
(t
’
@
rr
@
g
@
‘he swept’), m
@
c
ˇ
@
rr
@
š-
ɑ (< m
@
c
ˇ
@
rr
@
s-iy
ɑ) ‘finish, conclusion’ (cˇ
@
rr
@
s
@
‘he fin-
ished
’). An agent of a verb is expressed by a special stem suffixed by -i; verbs with
three or four root consonants have
ɑ after the next to last: n
@
g
ɑri ‘teller’ (root ngr),
t
@
rg
w
ɑmi ‘translator’ (trg
w
m); a derivation with a two-consonant root is s
@
mi
‘hearer’
(root sm
ɑ). Historical y or w appears in the agent of a two-consonant root whose basic
form has e < y or o < w: hiy
ɑ
˚ˇ
(i)
‘goer’ (hed
@
‘he went’), k’
@
w
ɑmi ‘stander’ (k’om
@
‘he
stood
’). An agent based on a noun is formed on the noun suffixed by -
@
n
ˇnˇ
ɑ: k’
@
ld-
@
n
ˇnˇ
ɑ
‘joker’ (k’
@
ld
‘joke’), f
@
r
@
s-
@
n
ˇnˇ
ɑ ‘horseman’ (f
@
r
@
s
‘horse’). (This suffix also forms
ordinal from cardinal numerals; see below.) Nationality is expressed by a place-name
and the suf
fix -
ɑwi: ingliz-ɑwi ‘English(man)’; also in ɑm
@
t-
ɑwi ‘annually’ (ɑm
@
t
‘year’).
An abstract noun of quality has the suf
fix -nn
@
t: set-i-nn
@
t
‘womanhood’ (set ‘woman’),
di-h
ɑ-nn
@
t
‘poverty’ (di-h
ɑ ‘poor’).
3.3 Adjectives
There are words whose usual function is as attribute to nouns including in comparisons,
such as ti-lli-k
’ ‘big, important’ and
ɑroge ‘old (non-human)’: ti-lli-k’ s
@
w
‘big (important)
person
’,
ɑroge bet ‘old house’. These may be nouns in fact (and only incipiently
adjectives), understood as ti-lli-k
’ ‘a big one’,
ɑroge ‘an old one’; they take the definite
AMHARIC
600
article, de
finite object, and plural suffixes: ti-lli-k’-u ‘the big one (m.)’, ti-lli-k’-ocˇcˇ ‘big
ones
’, k’on
˚ˇ
o-w
ɑ ‘the pretty one (f.)’, k’on
˚ˇ
o-woc
ˇcˇ ‘pretty ones’, k’on
˚ˇ
o-w
ɑ-n m
@
kin
ɑ
š
@
t
’
@
‘he sold the pretty car (f.).’ As in the previous example, the definite suffix attaches
to the adjective; but a possessive suf
fix attaches to the noun: ti-lli-k’-u bet ‘the big house’
vs ti-lli-k
’ bet-u ‘his big house’. The plural suffix attaches to the noun: k’on
˚ˇ
o m
@
kin-oc
ˇcˇ
‘pretty cars’ but optionally to the adjective: k’on
˚ˇ
-oc
ˇcˇ m
@
kin-oc
ˇcˇ. The quantifier hullu
‘all’ may follow its noun: s
@
w hullu
‘all the people’.
Adjectives may duplicate their middle consonant, which is followed or not by
ɑ, to
form a plural of
‘variousness’, as in ti-li-lli-k’ li-
˚ˇ
oc
ˇcˇ ‘various big children’ (ti-lli-k’ ‘big’),
r
@
˚ˇ
ɑ
˚ˇ˚ˇ
i-m w
@
tt
ɑdd
@
roc
ˇcˇ ‘various tall soldiers’ (r
@
˚ˇ˚ˇ
i-m
‘tall’). Like nouns these may be
pluralised: r
@
˚ˇ
ɑ
˚ˇ˚ˇ
i-m-oc
ˇcˇ n
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w
‘They are tall (ones)’.
An adjective meaning
‘having particularly or excessively a quality of a noun’ is the
noun suf
fixed by -
ɑm: hod-ɑm ‘greedy, gluttonous’ (hod ‘stomach’), m
@
lk-
ɑm
‘attractive, nice’ (m
@
lk
‘appearance’). An adjective of similar but intensified meaning
has the suf
fix -
ɑmmɑ: fi-rey-ɑmmɑ ‘fruitful’ (fi-re ‘fruit’), t’en-ɑmmɑ ‘healthy’ (t’enɑ
‘health’).
Comparison with an adjective is expressed by a prepositional phrase with k
@
- or t
@
-
‘from’ (t
@
- in northern dialects), as in k
@
-ssu i-ne di-h
ɑ n
@
n
ˇnˇ ‘I am poorer than he’ (lit.
‘from him I am poor’). Adjectives often have cognate verbs with which comparisons
may also be expressed: k
@
-ssu i-ne r
@
˚ˇ˚ˇ
i-m n
@
n
ˇnˇ or k
@
-ssu i-ne i-r
@
zzi-m
ɑll
@
hu
‘I am taller
than he
’ (r
@
zz
@
m
@
‘he grew tall’). Comparisons may be reinforced by a fixed-form
(lacking subject agreement) simple non-past verb such as yi-li-k
’ (l
ɑk’
@
‘he/it surpassed’)
or yi-b
@
lt
’ (b
@
ll
@
t
’
@
‘he/it exceeded’), as in:
h
ɑylu k-ɑnt
@
yi-b
@
lt
’ b
@
t
’
ɑm k’
@
c
ˇcˇ’i-n n
@
w
haylu from-you.Sg.m. more very thin is.he
‘Hailu is much thinner than you.’
A predicative superlative is a comparative in relation to hullu
‘all’: k
@
-hullu i-nn
@
ssu
di-h
ɑ nɑcˇcˇ
@
w
‘they are poorer than all’. Comparatives are discussed below in the section
on syntax.
3.4 Demonstratives
See the demonstratives in Table 35.4; these distinguish singular and plural and near
(proximal) and far (distal). Plural demonstratives consist of the plural pre
fix i-nn
@
- plus
locatives i-zzih
‘here’ and i-zzy
ɑ ‘there’. The demonstratives may be attributive as in yi-h
bet
‘this house’ or pronominal as in y
ɑ n
@
w
‘that’s it’.
Table 35.4 Demonstratives
Singular
Near
m.
yi-h
f.
yi-(hi-)c
ˇcˇ(i)
Far
m.
y
ɑ
f.
y
ɑcˇcˇ(i)
Plural
Near
i-nn
@
-zzih
Far
i-nn
@
-zzy
ɑ
AMHARIC
601
3.5 Numerals
See cardinal numerals in Table 35.5. Ordinals are the cardinals suf
fixed by -
@
n
ˇnˇ
ɑ (a suffix
which also forms noun agents):
ɑnd-
@
n
ˇnˇ
ɑ ‘first’, hɑyɑ hul
@
t-
@
n
ˇnˇ
ɑ ‘twenty-second’. In royal
titles
‘first’ is k’
@
d
ɑm-ɑwi (root k’
@
dd
@
m
@
‘he preceded’) and ‘second’ d
ɑgm-ɑwi (d
@
gg
@
m
@
‘he repeated’): k’
@
d
ɑmɑwi hɑyl
@
si-ll
ɑsi ‘Haile Sellasie I’, dɑgmɑwi mi-nili-k ‘Menelik II’.
Calendar years are expressed as in
ši z
@
t
’
@
n
ˇ m
@
to si-ls
ɑ sost (thousand nine hundred
sixty-three)
‘nineteen-sixty-three’.
3.6 Verbs
A verb is a stem plus (except in Sg.2m. imperative forms) a subject af
fix, and perhaps
other af
fixes.
3.6.1 Roots and Stems
Semitic verbs are traditionally thought of as consonantal or largely consonantal roots com-
pleted as stems by a pattern of vowels and sometimes additional consonants. Amharic stems
of representative verbs in the four main verb conjugations past, nonpast, imperative, and
conjunct, and the in
finitive, are exemplified in Table 35.6, where hyphens show the place of
obligatory subject suf
fixes (of the past and conjunct conjugations) or prefixes (nonpast).
The 12 verbs are representative of the 12 most common types, which differ by the
structure of their roots. Roots are minimal forms, thus material of the imperative column
less vowels
@
(supplied by verbal grammar) and (epenthetic) i-. Some roots, the B-types,
have long consonants shown as
‘:’ and exemplified by the second verbs of the first
three pairs in Table 35.6.
Consonant length of the historical next-to-last consonant is a characteristic of stems
in the past, and in the nonpast of verbs of the types of -b
ɑr:i-k, -m
@
s
@
k:i-r, and -f
@
n
@
d:
ɑ.
The historical regularity was obscured by loss of the last or next-to-last consonant,
usually leaving a vowel as re
flex. In the column of the past these are the types of k’om,
hed and s
ɑm which lost their next-to-last consonant, the types of b
@
l:
ɑ, l
@
k:
ɑ, and
f
@
n
@
d:
ɑ which lost their last consonant, and the types of k’
@
r:
@
and l
@
y:
@
which lost a
final consonant without leaving a vowel reflex. Verbs whose conjunct and infinitive
stems are augmented by -t are those which lost the
final consonant, for which the t
substitutes. In
finitive stems of Table 35.6 are shown with the infinitive prefix m
@
-.
Table 35.5 Cardinal Numbers
1
ɑnd
12
ɑsrɑ-hul
@
t
2
hul
@
t
20
h
ɑyɑ
3
sost
30
s
@
l
ɑsɑ
4
ɑrɑt
40
ɑrbɑ
5
ɑmmi-st
50
h
ɑmsɑ
6
si-ddi-st
60
si-ls
ɑ
7
s
@
b
ɑt
70
s
@
b
ɑ
8
si-mmi-nt
80
s
@
m
ɑnyɑ
9
z
@
t
’
@
n
ˇ
90
z
@
t
’
@
n
ɑ
10
ɑssi-r
100
m
@
to
11
ɑsr-ɑnd
1000
ši
AMHARIC
602
The 12 verb types have no meaning associations, but B-types tend to be transitive.
The type of b
ɑr:
@
k, with
ɑ after the first consonant, is often termed ‘C-type’. The first-
row triconsonantal type of k
@
f:
@
l is the most numerous. In Shoan or Addis Ababa
Amharic, the conjunct stems of biconsonantal verbs with a back-round vowel characteristic
are k
’om for k’um of the table and hed for hid.
Stems with initial
ɑ: some stems have initial ɑ, the vowel reflex of a lost (pharyngeal or
laryngeal) stem-initial consonant. Table 35.7 shows exemplary
ɑ-initial verbs corresponding
to the types of rows 1
–4 and 11 of Table 35.6.
So-called
‘doubled verbs’ have a repeated consonant in the pattern C
1
C
2
C
2
or
C
1
C
2
C
3
C
3
. Table 35.8 shows exemplary stems of doubled verbs corresponding to the
types of rows 1, 2 and 11 of Table 35.6. The doubled verb characteristic is shown in the
table as repetition of a consonant, not to be confused with long consonants which
characterise stems and shown with
‘:’.
3.6.2 Four Basic Conjugations
The past, nonpast, imperative, and conjunct conjugations are exempli
fied in Tables 35.9
and 35.10, by forms of the root ngr
‘tell’.
In the past, Sg.1 suf
fix -ku and Sg.2.m. suffix -k have forms with h (from historical
spirantisation of k) when the stem ends in a vowel (as so for
five verb types in Table
35.6), for example b
@
ll
ɑ-hu ‘I ate’, k’
@
rr
@
-h
‘you (Sg.2.m.) remained’. But Sg.1 -hu
may also appear after stem-
final consonants: k
@
ff
@
l-hu
‘I paid’, and in Amharic writing
-hu/-h may be written even when -ku/-k is read.
Table 35.7 Verb Stems with Initial
ɑ
Type
Past
Nonpast
Imper.
Conjunct
In
finitive
Gloss
A
ɑl:
@
f-
-
ɑlf
i-l
@
f
ɑlf-
m-
ɑl
@
f
‘pass’
B
ɑd:
@
n-
-
ɑd:i-n
ɑd:i-n
ɑd:i-n-
m-
ɑd:
@
n
‘hunt’
ɑy:
@
-
ɑy
i-y
ɑy-t-
m-
ɑy
@
-t
‘see’
ɑm:ɑ
-
ɑmɑ
i-m
ɑ
ɑm-t-
m-
ɑmɑ-t
‘slander’
ɑn
@
k:
@
s-
-
ɑn
@
k:i-s
ɑnki-s
ɑnki-s-
m-
ɑnk
@
s
‘limp’
Table 35.6 Verb Stems of 12 Root Types
Type
Past
Nonpast
Imper.
Conjunct
In
finitive
Gloss
A
k
@
f:
@
l-
-k
@
fl
ki-f
@
l
k
@
fl-
m
@
-kf
@
l
‘pay’
B
f
@
l:
@
g-
-f
@
l:i-g
f
@
l:i-g
f
@
l:i-g-
m
@
-f
@
l:
@
g
‘want’
A
k
’
@
r:
@
-k
’
@
r
k
’i-r
k
’
@
r-t-
m
@
-k
’r
@
-t
‘remain’
B
l
@
y:
@
-l
@
y:
l
@
y:
l
@
y:-i-t-
m
@
-l
@
y:
@
-t
‘separate’
A
b
@
l:
ɑ
-b
@
l
ɑ
bi-l
ɑ
b
@
l-t-
m
@
-bl
ɑ-t
‘eat’
B
l
@
k:
ɑ
-l
@
k:
ɑ
l
@
k:
ɑ
l
@
k:-i-t-
m
@
-l
@
k:
ɑ-t
‘measure’
k
’om-
-k
’om
k
’um
k
’um-
m
@
-k
’om
‘stand’
hed-
-hed
hid
hid-
m
@
-hed
‘go’
s
ɑm-
-si-m
s
ɑm
si-m-
m
@
-s
ɑm
‘kiss’
b
ɑr:
@
k-
-b
ɑr:i-k
b
ɑrk
b
ɑrk-
m
@
-b
ɑr
@
k
‘bless’
m
@
s
@
k:
@
r-
-m
@
s
@
k:i-r
m
@
ski-r
m
@
ski-r-
m
@
-m
@
sk
@
r
‘testify’
f
@
n
@
d:
ɑ
-f
@
n
@
d:
ɑ
f
@
nd
ɑ
f
@
nd-i-t-
m
@
-f
@
nd
ɑ-t
‘burst’
AMHARIC
603
The vowel of Sg.1 -ku/-hu is voiceless when word-
final, n
@
gg
@
r-ku
˚
, but is voiced if
an object suf
fix follows: n
@
gg
@
r-ku-t
‘I told him’. Pl.2 -
ɑcˇcˇi-hu reflects a plural suffix
-
ɑcˇcˇ ‘plural’. Stem-final vowels are absent with -u of Pl.3 (and equivalent polite forms),
as in b
@
ll-u
‘they ate’ (< b
@
ll
ɑ-u); otherwise the usual vowel elisions apply: k’
@
rr
@
-
@
>
k
’
@
rr
@
‘he remained’, l
@
kk
ɑ-
@
> l
@
kk
ɑ ‘he measured’.
Verbs of stative and active meaning are interpreted differently in the past: stative
verbs may be understood as present: k
’
@
rr
@
‘he remained ~ he remains’; s
@
kk
@
r
@
‘he
was/got drunk ~ he is drunk
’; whereas actives are past.
Negative past has a pre
fix
ɑl- and, as a main verb, a suffix -m(m): k-ɑl-n
@
gg
@
r-ku
‘if I
don
’t tell’ (minor verb with k- expressing ‘if’ and without -m),
ɑl-n
@
gg
@
r-ni--m
‘we
didn
’t tell’ (main verb).
Table 35.8 Stems of ‘Doubled’ Verbs
Type
Past
Nonpast
Imper.
Conjunct
In
finitive
Gloss
A
b
@
r:
@
r-
-b
@
rr
b
@
rr
b
@
rr-
m
@
-br
@
r
‘fly’
B
d
@
l:
@
l-
-d
@
l:i-l
d
@
l:i-l
d
@
l:i-l-
m
@
-d
@
l:
@
l
‘cajole’
d
@
n
@
g:
@
g-
-d
@
n
@
g:i-g
d
@
ngi-g
d
@
n
@
g:i-g-
m
@
-d
@
ng
@
g
‘decree’
Table 35.9 Past and Nonpast Conjugations
Past
Nonpast
minor verb
Nonpast
main verb
Sg.
1
n
@
gg
@
r-ku
i--n
@
gr
i--n
@
gr-
ɑll
@
hu
2
m.
n
@
gg
@
r-k
ti--n
@
gr
ti--n
@
gr-
ɑll
@
h
f.
n
@
gg
@
r-
š
ti--n
@
gr-i
ti--n
@
gr-i-
ɑll
@
š
pol.
(=Pl.3)
(=Pl.3)
(=Pl.3)
3
m.
n
@
gg
@
r-
@
yi--n
@
gr
yi--n
@
gr-
ɑl
f.
n
@
gg
@
r-
@
c
ˇcˇ
ti--n
@
gr
ti--n
@
gr-
ɑll
@
c
ˇcˇ
pol.
(=Pl.3)
(=Pl.3)
(=Pl.3)
Pl.
1
n
@
gg
@
r-(i-)n
i-n(ni-)-n
@
gr
i-n(ni-)-n
@
gr-
ɑll
@
n
2
n
@
gg
@
r-
ɑcˇcˇi-hu
ti--n
@
gr-u
ti--n
@
gr-
ɑllɑcˇcˇi-hu
3
n
@
gg
@
r-u
yi--n
@
gr-u
yi--n
@
gr-
ɑllu
Table 35.10 Jussive and Conjunct Conjugations
Jussive
Minor verb
conjunct
Main verb conjunct
Sg. 1
li--ng
@
r
n
@
gi-r-:e
n
@
gi-r-:e-
ɑll
@
hu
2
m.
ti--ng
@
r
n
@
gr-
@
h
n
@
gr-
@
h-
ɑl
f.
ti--ng
@
r-i
n
@
gr-
@
š
n
@
gr-
@
š-
ɑl
pol.
(=Pl.3)
(=Pl.3)
(=Pl.3)
3
m.
yi--ng
@
r
n
@
gr-o
n
@
gr-o-(w)
ɑl
f.
ti--ng
@
r
n
@
gr-
ɑ
n
@
gr-
ɑll
@
c
ˇcˇ
pol.
(=Pl.3)
(=Pl.3)
(=Pl.3)
Pl.
1
i-n(ni-)-ng
@
r
n
@
gr-
@
n
n
@
gr-
@
n-
ɑl
2
ti--ng
@
r-u
n
@
gr-
ɑcˇcˇi-hu
n
@
gr-
ɑcˇcˇi-hu-ɑl
3
yi--ng
@
r-u
n
@
gr-
@
w
n
@
gr-
@
w-
ɑl
AMHARIC
604
An object suf
fix pronoun follows the subject suffix and precedes -m: n
@
gg
@
r-
@
c
ˇcˇ-i-h
‘she told you (Sg.m.)’,
ɑl-n
@
gg
@
r-ku-t-i-m
‘I didn’t tell him’.
The nonpast conjugation has subject pre
fixes plus the Sg.2.f. suffix -i and Pl.3 (and
polite form) -u; see Table 35.9, again exempli
fied by ‘tell’ (nonpast stem -n
@
gr).
Nonpast subject pre
fix t- may be geminated when it follows an adverb-clause prefix
such as s-
‘when’ (with which there is epenthesis): s-t-n
@
gr-i > si-t(ti-)n
@
gri
‘when you
(Sg.f.) tell
’. Subject prefix y- after consonants is replaced by i: s-y-hed > sihed ‘when
he goes
’. Stem-final alveolar consonants except r when followed by Sg.2f. suffix -i are
replaced by alveopalatals as discussed in the above section on consonants.
Verbs of stative and active meaning are interpreted differently in the nonpast: active
verbs in the nonpast may be understood as present or future: yi--n
@
gr
‘he tells ~ will
tell
’, whereas statives are only future: yi--s
@
kr
‘he will be (get) drunk’ (or sometimes
habitual present meaning).
Negative nonpasts have a pre
fix
ɑ- and, as main verbs, suffix -m(m): ɑ-y-n
@
gr-i-m
‘he
won
’t tell’, b
ɑ-n(ni-)-n
@
gr
‘if we don’t tell’. Negative nonpast Sg.1 prefix is l- instead of
i-- of the af
firmative:
ɑ-l-hed-i-m ‘I won’t go’. Subject prefix t- is usually lengthened
after the negative pre
fix:
ɑ-tti--n
@
gi-r
‘she doesn’t tell’.
The nonpast af
firmative main verb (except when suffixed by -nn
ɑ ‘and’ in compound
verbs) has auxiliary-verb suf
fixes historically forms of the verb of presence (
ɑl- + suf-
fixes, see below). The final vowel of the Sg.1 auxiliary -
ɑll
@
hu is voiceless when word
final, so this sounds like
ɑll
@
w
˚
. The Pl.2/3 suf
fix -u of the simple nonpast is absent upon
suf
fixation of the plural auxiliary verb, unless Pl.3 (and polite-form) -u is followed by an
object suf
fix, in which case the auxiliary verb is -
ɑl not -ɑllu: for example yi--n
@
gr-u-t-
ɑl
‘they tell him’.
As in the above example, an object pronoun precedes the suf
fixed auxiliary: yi--n
@
gr-
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w-
ɑl ‘he tells them/him.pol.’, i--n
@
gr-i-
š-
ɑll
@
hu
‘I tell you.Sg.f.’.
The imperative(-jussive) conjugation is exempli
fied in Table 35.10, again with ‘tell’
(jussive stem -ng
@
r). The jussive expresses a wish or polite command/request as in yi--mt
’
ɑ
‘let him come’, yi--ng
@
r-i-h
‘may (it be so that) he tell you.Sg.m.’, with 1st and 3rd-
person jussives typically understood as
‘let V’, for example i-nni--hid ‘let us go’. The
jussive is the imperative stem plus pre
fixes and suffixes of the nonpast except that
instead of Sg.1 i-- the jussive has l- (as also in the negative nonpast).
The jussive is absent in minor clauses. Negative jussives like negative nonpasts are
pre
fixed with
ɑ- and, as in the negative nonpast, 2nd-person negative jussives may have
lengthening of subject pre
fix t-:
ɑ-t(ti-)-hid-u ‘don’t go! (Pl.2)’.
Imperatives are 2nd-person jussive stems, respectively ni-g
@
r, ni-g
@
r-i, ni-g
@
r-u (all
having i--epenthesis)
‘tell! (Sg.m., Sg.f., Sg.pol./Pl.)’. Stem-final alveolar consonants of
Sg.2f. have the usual palatalisations as in wi-s
@
˚ˇ
(i)
‘take! (Sg.f.)’ vs wi-s
@
d, Sg.m. The
negative imperative is expressed by 2nd-person negative jussives pre
fixed by nega-
tive
ɑ-, in which 2nd-person subject prefix t- is usually lengthened: ɑ-tti--ng
@
r
‘don’t
tell! (Sg.m.)
’.
The conjunct conjugation (sometimes termed
‘gerundive’ or ‘converb’) is exempli-
fied in Table 35.10, as both minor and main verbs, again with forms of ‘tell’, stem n
@
gr.
The minor-verb conjunct expresses all but the last of a sequence of states or events, the
main verb being of any form, for example k
@
fl-
@
n w
@
tt
’
ɑn ‘they paid and left’ (‘having
paid, they left
’, with main verb in the past), k
@
fl-
@
n i-nni-hed
ɑll
@
n
‘we will pay and go’
(
‘having paid, we will go’, main verb nonpast). Subjects of the conjunct and main verb
need not be the same: s
@
rk
’-o
ɑss
@
r-u-t
‘he having robbed, they imprisoned him’.
AMHARIC
605
The conjunct is a stem and subject suf
fixes. Conjunct stems are similar to but dif-
ferent from those of the nonpast (Table 35.6). A stem-
final consonant is lengthened in
Sg.1 necessitating epenthesis before the long consonant, e.g. n
@
gi-r-:e-w w
@
tt
’
ɑhu ‘I told
him and left
’, which if alveolar other than r has the usual palatalisations, for example
w
@
si-
˚ˇ
-:e
‘I taking’ (stem w
@
sd). Stem augment t is palatalised too: m
@
t
’i-cˇ-:e ‘I coming’
(stem m
@
t
’-t).
The conjunct lacks negative forms except in the Gojjam dialect, in which the negative
conjunct like the past is pre
fixed by
ɑl- and suffixed by -m.
The main-verb conjunct like the main-verb nonpast combines with an auxiliary verb
suf
fix based on the verb of presence to express a past event with still-present effects,
like an English
‘present perfect’: n
@
gr-o-
ɑl ‘he has told’. As in the nonpast, an object
suf
fix precedes the auxiliary verb: n
@
gr-o-n
ˇnˇ-
ɑl ‘he has told me’.
The in
finitive is a deverbal noun, a stem prefixed by m
@
- as in m
@
-ng
@
r gi-dd n
@
w
‘to
tell is a necessity
’, m
@
-hed yi-w
@
dd
ɑl ‘he likes to go’. Where purpose is expressed, the
in
finitive is prefixed by l
@
-: l
@
-m
@
-hed yi-f
@
lli-g
ɑl ‘he wants to go’. In ɑ-initial stems,
@
of
m
@
- is elided: m-
ɑd
@
r
‘to spend the night’, m-
ɑy
@
t
‘to see’. A negative infinitive is pre-
fixed by
ɑl
@
-:
ɑl
@
-m
@
-ng
@
r
‘not to tell’. The infinitive may take the possessive pronoun
suf
fixes (Table 35.3) as subject: m
@
-ng
@
r-w
ɑ ‘her telling’, m
@
-hed-
ɑcˇcˇi-n ‘our going’.
3.6.3 Other Conjugations
Verbs with other aspectual and modal meanings are constructed of one of the above as
main verb plus an auxiliary verb. Some of these are: (1) a
‘past perfect’ for an event in
the past prior to another, which is a minor-verb conjunct with auxiliary verb n
@
bb
@
r: i-ne
s-i--m
@
t
’
ɑ hed-o n
@
bb
@
r
‘When I came, he had gone’, b
@
lt-
@
n n
@
bb
@
r
‘we had eaten’;
(2) for possibility or probability a minor-verb conjunct with nonpast yi--hon-
ɑl (hon
‘become’): k’
@
t
’
@
ro-w-n r
@
si-c
ˇ-:e yi-hon
ɑl ‘I might have (must have) forgotten the
appointment
’ (r
@
ss
ɑ ‘he forgot’); (3) for ‘imminence, an event about to happen’, a
minor verb nonpast pre
fixed by l- with a form of ‘say’ prefixed by s- ‘when’: l-i-hed s-i-l
‘when he was about to go’ (i- of s-i the postconsonantal form of the Sg.3m. y-, and
-l the nonpast stem of
‘say’); (4) for obligation an infinitive with the verb of pre-
sence (below) suf
fixed by -bb- and an object suffix: m
@
bl
ɑt ɑll
@
-bb-i-n
ˇnˇ ‘I have to eat’,
m
@
hed y
@
ll
@
-bb-i-
š-i-m ‘you (Sg.f.) don’t have to go’; (5) for habitual or conditional past
the simple nonpast with n
@
bb
@
r: yi--n
@
gi-r n
@
bb
@
r
‘he used to tell’/‘he would have told’; (6)
for progressive aspect i-yy
@
- pre
fixed to the past plus the copula (for which see below) in
the nonpast and conjugated forms of n
@
bb
@
r in the past: i-yy
@
-f
@
ll
@
g
@
-w n
@
w
‘he is
looking for it
’, i-zziy
ɑ i-yy
@
-s
@
rr-
ɑcˇcˇ n
@
bb
@
r-
@
c
ˇcˇ ‘she was working there’.
3.6.4 The Copula
This is an irregular verb of being, with only the non-past forms seen in Table 35.11. The
copula is a stem n- conjugated with object suf
fixes, except for alternative to Sg.3f. n-
ɑt, with
an object suf
fix, n-
@
c
ˇcˇ with the subject-suffix of the past. In fact n
@
c
ˇcˇ is more common.
The negative nonpast copula is negative pre
fix
ɑy-, the stem d
@
ll
@
(doll
@
in Gojjam
dialect), and suf
fixes of the regular past (Table 35.11). In the past, the be-verb is regular
past forms of n
@
bb
@
r-, for example n
@
bb
@
r-ku
‘I was’, n
@
bb
@
r-k
‘you (Sg.m.) were’, with
regular negatives,
ɑl-n
@
bb
@
r-ku-m
‘I was not’, etc. In the future, the be-verb is regular
nonpast forms of -hon
‘be/become’, for example i--hon ‘I will be’, yi--hon ‘he will be’.
AMHARIC
606
3.6.5 Verb of Presence
There is an irregular verb for locative sentences and presentatives such as
‘there is a _ ’;
see Table 35.12. The stem is
ɑll
@
conjugated as a past although the meaning is present.
The negative nonpast verb of presence as a main verb has the stem y
@
ll
@
with subject
suf
fixes of the past plus -m, as in y
@
ll
@
-hu-m
‘I am not present’. If there are locative
adverbs, the copula may replace the verb of presence: i-zzih n
@
w ~ i-zzih
ɑll
@
‘he/it is
here
’ (or ‘here he/it is’).
In the past the verb of presence and be-verb are nondistinct, for example n
@
bb
@
r-ku
‘I was (present)’, n
@
bb
@
r-k
‘you (Sg.m.) were (present)’. The verb of presence in the
future employs the stem nor (< *n
@
br): yi--nor-
ɑl ‘he/it will be’ (which stem in the past
means
‘reside, live’: i-zzy
ɑ nor-
@
c
ˇcˇ ‘she lived there’).
3.6.6 Possession
Possession is expressed by the verb of presence with object suf
fixes as possessor and
the verb stem ordinarily agreeing in gender and number with the thing(s) possessed:
m
@
kin
ɑ ɑll
@
-n
ˇnˇ ‘I have a car’ (car is-to.me), i-hi-te bi-zu li-
˚ˇ
oc
ˇcˇ
ɑllu-ɑt ‘My sister has many
children
’, i-hi-t
ɑll
@
c
ˇcˇ-i-w ‘he has a sister’. For possession in the past the stem is n
@
bb
@
r
with the object suf
fixes: b
@
k
’i g
@
nz
@
b n
@
bb
@
r-
ɑt ‘she had enough money’. Amharic has
Table 35.11 Copula
Af
firmative
Negative
Sg.
1
n
@
-n
ˇnˇ
ɑy-d
@
ll
@
-hu-m
2
m.
n
@
-h
ɑy-d
@
ll
@
-h-i-m
f.
n
@
-
š
ɑy-d
@
ll
@
-
š-i-m
pol.
n
@
-wot
(=Pl.3)
3
m.
n
@
-w
ɑy-d
@
ll
@
-m
f.
n
@
-c
ˇcˇ ~ n-
ɑt
ɑy-d
@
ll
@
-c
ˇcˇ-i-m
pol.
(=Pl.3.)
(=Pl.3)
Pl.
1
n
@
-n
ɑy-d
@
ll
@
-n-i-m
2
n-
ɑcˇcˇi-hu
ɑy-d
@
ll-
ɑcˇcˇi-hu-m
3
n-
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w
ɑy-d
@
ll-u-m
Table 35.12 Verb of Presence
Af
firmative
Negative
Sg.
1
ɑll
@
-hu
y
@
ll
@
-hu-m
2
m.
ɑll
@
-h
y
@
ll
@
-h-i-m
f.
ɑll
@
-
š
y
@
ll
@
-
š-i-m
pol.
(=Pl.3)
(=Pl.3)
3
m.
ɑll
@
y
@
ll
@
-m
f.
ɑll
@
-c
ˇcˇ
y
@
ll
@
-c
ˇcˇ-i-m
pol.
(=Pl.3)
(=Pl.3)
Pl.
1
ɑll
@
-n
y
@
ll
@
-n-i-m
2
ɑll-ɑcˇcˇi-hu
y
@
ll-
ɑcˇcˇi-hu-m
3
ɑll-u
y
@
ll-u-m
AMHARIC
607
other such
‘impersonal’ verbs, which take as their object the subject of their usual
translation equivalent, including the verbs for being hungry and thirsty: r
ɑb
@
-n
ˇnˇ ‘I am
hungry
’ (it.hungers-me), t’
@
mm-
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w
‘they are thirsty’ (it.thirsts-them).
3.6.7 Derived Verbs
Fully productive are two causatives with pre
fixes
ɑ- and ɑs- and a passive-reflexive
with pre
fix t(
@
)-.
Causatives of intransitive verbs are typically formed with the pre
fix
ɑ-, for example
ɑ-f
@
ll
ɑ ‘he boiled (caused to boil)’ (f
@
ll
ɑ ‘it boiled’); y-ɑ-w
@
dk
’ ‘he makes fall’ (yi--w
@
dk
’
‘he falls’). Some transitives whose meanings involve benefit to the self including ‘eat’,
‘drink’ and ‘dress’ form causatives with
ɑ-: ɑ-b
@
ll
ɑ ‘he caused to eat’, y-ɑ-l
@
bs
‘he
causes (others) to dress
’. Both intransitive and transitive verbs having
ɑ-initial stems
form causatives with
ɑs-, such as ɑs-ɑmm
@
n
@
‘he causes to believe’. Imperative-jussive
and conjunct stems of
ɑ-causative stems of triconsonantal verbs differ from the basic
stem as in
ɑ-ski-r ‘cause to get drunk! (Sg.m.)’ (cf. basic stem si-k
@
r),
ɑ-ski-r-o ‘he,
causing to get drunk
’ (cf. basic s
@
kr-o). The imperative-jussive
ɑ-causative stem of
verbs of the s
ɑm
@
type (Table 35.6) also differs from the basic stem, as in
ɑ-si-m ‘cause
to kiss (Sg.m.)!
’ (basic s
ɑm ‘kiss (Sg.m.)!’).
Causatives, or factitives, of transitive verbs are formed with the pre
fix
ɑs-, for
example
ɑs-g
@
dd
@
l
@
‘he caused to kill’, y-
ɑs-f
@
lli-g
‘it is necessary’ (lit. ‘it causes to
want/seek
’). The
ɑs-causative of an intransitive is an ‘indirect’ causative perhaps with
two agents, for example
ɑs-m
@
tt
’
ɑ ‘he caused someone to bring (something)’ (cf. m
@
tt
’
ɑ
‘he came’ with
ɑ-causative ɑ-m
@
tt
’
ɑ ‘he brought (caused to come)’). Both objects of the
causative verb, if de
finite, are suffixed by the definite object suffix -n. As-causatives of
A-type (non-geminating) stems are formed as B-types, having a long consonant; for
example nonpast
ɑs-causative of A-type root sbr ‘break’ is y-ɑs-s
@
b:i-r, with long b. The
imperative-jussive
ɑs-causative stem of verbs of the sɑm
@
type (Table 35.6) also differ
from the basic stem, as in
ɑs-li-k-u ‘cause to send!’ (cf. basic lɑk ‘send!’).
Passive-re
flexive verbs are formed with the prefix t(
@
)- and stem-changes, for exam-
ple t
@
-b
@
ll
ɑ ‘it is eaten’. See passive-reflexive stems of the nonpast, imperative, and
in
finitive, some different from basic stems, in Table 35.13. Some of these derivatives
express a re
flexive, for example t-
ɑtt’
@
b
@
‘he washed himself’ (
ɑtt’
@
b
@
‘he washed’), or
the intransitive of a transitive, for example t
@
-m
@
ll
@
s
@
‘he returned (vi)’ (m
@
ll
@
s
@
‘he
returned (vt)
’).
Passive-re
flexive nonpast and conjunct stems of A-type (non-geminating) verbs are
formed as B-types, with a long consonant, for example, the nonpast t-passive of A-type
root kft
‘open’ is yi--k:
@
f:
@
t
‘it is opened’, with long f of the B-type. In the nonpast the
stem-initial consonant is long as the result of assimilation of the passive pre
fix t, thus
yi--k:
@
f:
@
t < yi--tk
@
f:
@
t. Re
flexive-passive t- of a nonpast, jussive, or infinitive of a verb
with initial
ɑ is lengthened, as in yi--tt-ɑmm
@
n
‘it is believed’, m
@
-tt-
ɑl
@
f
‘to be passed’.
A derived verb expressing reciprocity has the pre
fix t(
@
)- and the vowel
ɑ after the
first stem consonant: t
@
-n
ɑgg
@
ru
‘they conversed (told to each other)’ (n
@
gg
@
r
@
‘he
told
’), t
@
-m
ɑttu ‘they hit each other’ (m
@
tt
ɑ ‘he hit’). This derivative may also express a
habitual, as in t
@
b
ɑll
@
‘he habitually ate’ (b
@
ll
ɑ ‘he ate’). The causative of this derivative
is an adjutative (
‘help to V’) as in
ɑ-ffɑll
@
g
@
‘he helped to seek’ (f
@
ll
@
g
@
‘he sought,
wanted
’),
ɑ-wwɑll
@
d-
@
c
ˇcˇ ‘she helped to give birth (as midwife)’ (w
@
ll
@
d-
@
c
ˇcˇ ‘she gave
birth
’), the stem-initial long consonant resulting from assimilation of t-.
AMHARIC
608
Some verbs with
ɑ-initial basic stems take the compound prefix ɑs-t- to form a causative
of the passive:
ɑs-t-ɑww
@
k
’
@
‘he notified, announced’ (
ɑww
@
k
’
@
‘he knew’),
ɑs-t-ɑrr
@
k
’
@
‘he reconciled’ (t-
ɑrr
@
k
’u ‘they were reconciled’).
A derived verb expressing repetition and attenuated action has reduplication of the
historical next-to-last consonant preceded by stem-vowel
ɑ, for example sɑsɑm
@
‘he
kissed repeatedly/a little
’ (s
ɑm
@
‘he kissed’), n
@
k
ɑkkɑ ‘he repeatedly/barely touched’
(n
@
kk
ɑ ‘he touched’).
There are so-called
‘defective verbs’, which lack basic stems and occur only as a
derivational type, for example, in the absence of verbs d
@
rr
@
g
@
or k
’
@
mm
@
t
’
@
there are
ɑ-d
@
rr
@
g
@
‘he did’, t
@
-d
@
rr
@
g
@
‘it was done’,
ɑs-k’
@
mm
@
t
’
@
‘he put, placed’, and
t
@
-k
’
@
mm
@
t
’
@
‘he was seated (seated himself)’. A non-productive prefix n- appears in a
number of defective verbs, especially quadriconsonantal and reduplicatives, always
with one of the pre
fixes
ɑ- or t-, for example t
@
-n-b
@
r
@
kk
@
k
@
‘he knelt’,
ɑ-n-s’
@
b
ɑrr
@
k
’
@
‘it glittered’.
3.6.8 Denominal Verbs
Verbs may be derived from nouns, though not freely, by abstracting the consonants of
the noun and assigning the resulting consonantal root to a verb type, often B-type, for
example from m
@
rz
‘poison (n.)’ yi--m
@
rri-z
‘he poisons’ (with long r), and from cˇ’
ɑmmɑ
‘shoes’ t
@
-c
ˇ
ɑmmɑ ‘put on shoes’.
3.6.9 ‘Say-verbs’
A peculiarity of Ethiopian languages and especially Amharic is verbs consisting of an
often seemingly ideophonic word with a
final long consonant and a conjugated form of
the verb
‘say’ (with forms
ɑl
@
‘he said’ yi--l ‘he says’, b
@
l
‘say!’, bi-l-o ‘he saying’, m-
ɑl
@
-t
‘to say’), for example bi-kk’
ɑl
@
‘he appeared’, k’ucˇcˇ’
ɑl
@
‘he sat down’, and zi-mm
ɑl
@
‘he was quiet’. Transitive verbs employ ‘do’ instead of ‘say’: bi-kk’
ɑd
@
rr
@
g
@
‘he caused to
appear
’, li-bb
ɑdi-rg ‘look out!’ Two somewhat productive derivations of ‘say’ compound
verbs are an attenuative exempli
fied by w
@
dd
@
kk
’
ɑl
@
‘he fell a little’, and an intensive
exempli
fied by wi-di-kk’
ɑl
@
‘he fell hard’, both derived from the root wdk’ ‘fall’.
Table 35.13 Reflexive-passive Stems of Verbs of the 12 Types
Nonpast
Imperative
In
finitive
Gloss
-k:
@
f:
@
t
t
@
-k
@
f
@
t
m
@
-k:
@
f
@
t
‘be opened’
-f:
@
l:
@
g
t
@
-f
@
l
@
g
m
@
-f:
@
l
@
g
‘be sought’
-f:
@
˚ˇ:
t
@
-f
@
˚ˇ
m
@
-f:
@
˚ˇ
@
-t
‘be consumed
-l:
@
y:
t
@
-l
@
y
m
@
-l:
@
y
@
-t
‘be separated’
-b:
@
l:
ɑ
t
@
-b
@
l
ɑ
m
@
-b:
@
l
ɑ-t
‘be eaten’
-l:
@
k:
ɑ
t
@
-l
@
k
ɑ
m
@
-l:
@
k
ɑ-t
‘be measured’
-s:
ɑm
t
@
-s
ɑm
m
@
-s:
ɑm
‘be kissed’
-
š:om
t
@
-
šom
m
@
-
š:om
‘be appointed’
-g:et
’
t
@
-get
’
m
@
-g:et
’
‘be adorned’
-b:
ɑr:
@
k
t
@
-b
ɑr
@
k
m
@
-b:
ɑr
@
k
‘be blessed’
-m:
@
z
@
g:
@
b
t
@
-m
@
zg
@
b
m
@
-m:
@
zg
@
b
‘be recorded’
-z:
@
r
@
g:
ɑ
t
@
-z
@
rg
ɑ
m
@
-z:
@
rg
ɑ-t
‘be stretched’
AMHARIC
609
4 Syntax
4.1 Basic Word Order
The verb is
final in its clause with rare exception (cleft sentences, below), for example:
t
@
m
ɑri-w t’i-yyɑk’e t’
@
yy
@
k
’
@
student-the question asked.he
‘the student asked a question’
Typically, the subject is
first in its clause (SOV), as above, but when the verb object is
de
finite and topicalised (or backgrounded) this usually precedes the subject, in which
case the verb has a
‘resumptive’ object pronoun suffix, for example:
yi-h-i-n w
@
mb
@
r yoh
ɑnni-s s
@
rr
ɑ-w
this-Obj chair Yohannes made.he-it
‘Yohannes made this chair’
A clause-initial instrumental prepositional phrase is similarly resumptively expressed as
a suf
fix on the verb.
b
@
-m
@
t
’r
@
giy
ɑ-w seti-yye-wɑ bet-u-n t’
@
rr
@
g-
@
c
ˇcˇ-i-bb-
@
t
with-broom-the woman-the house-the-Obj swept-she-with-it
‘the woman swept the house with a broom’
Interrogative pronouns are not fronted but are preverbal: yoh
ɑnni-s mi-n n
@
gg
@
r
@
‘What
(mi-n) did Yohannis say?
’, li-
˚ˇ
oc
ˇcˇu l
@
mi-n y
ɑl
@
k
’s
ɑllu ‘Why (l
@
mi-n) do the children cry?
’
4.2 Yes
–No Questions
These may have rising intonation or less often sentence-
final question words i-nde
‘really?’, w
@
y, or the literary archaic verb suf
fix -ni-; for example
ɑster ti-hedɑl
@
c
ˇcˇ w
@
y,
ɑster
ti-hed
ɑl
@
c
ˇcˇ i-nde,
ɑster ti-hedɑl
@
c
ˇcˇ-i-ni- ‘Will Aster go?’ A one-word ‘reprise’ question has
the clause-
final suffix -ss:
ti-hed
ɑlli-h (w
@
y)
–
ɑwon. ɑncˇi-ss
‘Will you (Sg.2m.) go? – Yes. And you (Sg.2f.)?’
4.3 Noun Phrases
The head noun is typically
final in its phrase: t’i-ru m
@
ls
‘a good answer’, y-
ɑbbɑte ɑddis
m
@
kin
ɑ ‘My father’s new car’. In a few idioms borrowed from or modelled on Ge‘ez,
this order is reversed and
@
is suf
fixed to the head noun: bet
@
m
@
s
’
ɑhi-ft ‘library’ (lit.
‘house-of books’), bet
@
m
@
ngi-st
‘palace’ (lit. ‘house-of government’).
4.4 Prepositions
Frequent prepositions include b
@
-
‘at, on’, i-- ‘at, in’, l
@
-
‘for’, k
@
-
‘from’ (t
@
- in northern
dialects), si-l
@
-
‘about’, i-nd
@
-
‘like’ (the latter two may be written as separate words),
AMHARIC
610
and w
@
d
@
‘to, towards’ (always a separate word). Some positional relations are expres-
sed with postpositional words historically nouns, including l
ɑy ‘top’, wi-st’ ‘interior’, fit
‘face’ and h
w
ɑlɑ ‘back’, for example ɑlgɑ lɑy ‘on the bed’, hod wi-st’ ‘in the belly’.
Sometimes postpositions co-occur with prepositions, for example (b
@
-)bet wi-st
’ ‘in the
house
’, k
@
-ssu b
@
-
fit ‘in front of him’, k
@
-ne b
@
-h
w
ɑlɑ ‘after/behind me’.
4.5 Coordination
Nouns are coordinated with -nn
ɑ suffixed to the next-to-last: bɑl-i-nnɑ mist ‘husband and
wife
’, s
@
w-i-nn
ɑ set ‘man and woman’. Verbs may be coordinated with -nnɑ if the verb
suf
fixed by -nn
ɑ is a past, minor-verb nonpast or imperative: t
@
n
@
ssu-nn
ɑ w
@
tt
’u ‘they got
up and left
’, yi-m
@
t
’
ɑ-nnɑ yɑyɑl ‘he will come and see’, hid-i-nnɑ i-y ‘go (Sg.m.) and see!’
Alternatives are coordinated with w
@
y suf
fixed by -m(m) in statements (-m(m) the
historical contrastive-topicalising suf
fix) and -ss in questions (-ss the contrast-question
suf
fix): i-zzih w
@
y-m i-zzy
ɑ ‘here or there’, i-zzih w
@
y-ss i-zzy
ɑ ‘here or there?’ Alternatives
may be simply juxtaposed: m
@
hon
ɑl
@
-m
@
hon
‘to be or not to be’. Coordinated clauses
are usually expressed by use of conjunct verbs, which need no conjunction, for exam-
ple b
@
lto t
’
@
tt
’
ɑ ‘he ate and drank’, t’wɑt w
@
t
’i-cˇcˇe m
ɑtɑ d
@
rr
@
sku
‘I left in the morning
and arrived in the evening
’. Contrast clauses are coordinated with gi-n, n
@
g
@
r gi-n, or
(somewhat literary) d
ɑru gi-n ‘but’: m
@
tt
’
ɑhu gi-n ɑlb
@
ll
ɑhum ‘I came but I didn’t eat’.
4.6 Adjective (Relative) Clauses
These precede the noun they modify, and y
@
- (identical to the possessive pre
fix of
nouns) is pre
fixed to the verb in the past and y
@
-mm- in the nonpast. In Gojjam dialect
the pre
fix for nonpast verbs may be simply m- and in Menz and Wello dialects i-mm-,
the latter also seen in old Amharic literature.
b
@
-sid
ɑmo y
@
-t
@
g
@
n
ˇnˇ
@
h
ɑwlt
in-Sidamo Rel-was.found.it statue
‘a statue which was found in Sidamo’
si-l
@
-tege t
’
ɑytu y
@
mm-i-n
@
gi-r t
ɑrik
about-Empress Taitu Rel-it-tell history
‘history which tells about Empress Taitu’
If the head noun of an adjective clause is object of a preposition
‘on/at’ (b
@
-) or
‘for’
(l
@
-), this appears as a pronoun suf
fixed to -bb- or -ll-, respectively, within the verb:
yi-h y
@
-t
@
-w
@
ll
@
d-ku-bb-
@
t bet n
@
w
this Rel-Pas-born-I-in-it house is
‘this is the house I was born in’
If the clause is object of a preposition, the verb of the clause may be pre
fixed by the
preposition in which case the relative verb pre
fix y
@
- is absent: si-l
@
-t
’
ɑytu b
@
-mm-i-n
@
gi-r
m
@
s
’i-h
ɑf ‘in a book which tells about Taitu’. In the dialect of Gojjam and in old
Amharic literature, the plural verb of an adjective clause may take the noun-plural
suf
fix -ocˇcˇ, for example y
@
-m
@
tt
’-ocˇcˇ s
@
w-oc
ˇcˇ ‘people who came’.
AMHARIC
611
For cleft sentences, also constructed with relative verbs, see below.
4.7 Noun Clauses
These may be formed on the verb in the nonpast, where the noun-clause and main-clause
subjects are the same, with verb-pre
fix l-:
l-i-w
@
sd-
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w
ɑ-l-f
@
ll
@
g-i-m
that-I.take-them Neg-I-want-Neg
‘I don’t want to take them’
The same meaning may be expressed with an in
finitive verb as follows:
i-nn
@
ssu-n l
@
-m
@
-ws
@
d
ɑ-l-f
@
lli-g-i-m
them-Obj for-Inf-take Neg-I-want-Neg
‘I don’t want to take them’
A noun clause expressing purpose, whose subject may be different from the main-clause
subject, employs the pre
fix i-nd-:
i-ndi--n-m
@
t
’
ɑ yi-f
@
lli-g-
ɑllu
that-we-come want-Aux.they
‘they want us to come’
A headless adjective clause functions as a noun clause (alternatively: these noun clauses
may function as adjective clauses), for example:
y
@
-t
@
-g
@
n
ˇnˇ
@
-w sid
ɑmo wi-st’ n
@
-w
Rel-Pas-found.it-the Sidamo in is-it
‘what was (~where it was) found is in Sidamo’
y
@
mm-i-n
@
gr-i-
š wi-š
@
t n
@
-w
Rel-he-tell-you.Sg.f. false is-it
‘what he tells you (Sg.f.) is false’
Noun clauses functioning as objects of the verb are suf
fixed, on the verb of the clause,
by the de
finite object suffix -n:
y
@
-s
’
ɑf-k-
@
w-n
ɑn
@
bb
@
b-ku-t
Rel-wrote-you.Sg.m.-it-the read-I-it
‘I read what you wrote’
So-called
‘cleft’ sentences expressing presuppositions and employing the nominalised
relative clause are frequent in spoken and written Amharic. The following sentence
presupposes
‘someone ordered it’.
y-
ɑzz
@
z-u-t i-ss
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w n-
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w
Rel-ordered-he.pol-it he.pol is-he.pol
‘it is he (pol.) who ordered it’
AMHARIC
612
y-
ɑzz
@
z-u-t m
ɑn n-ɑcˇcˇ
@
w
Rel-ordered-he.pol-it who is-he.pol
‘who is it who ordered it?’
The latter clefted question may be as frequent as the simple question m
ɑn ɑzz
@
zut
‘Who
ordered it?
’. The above sentence
y
@
-t
@
-g
@
n
ˇnˇ
@
-w sid
ɑmo wi-st’ n
@
-w
Rel-Pas-found.it-the Sidamo in is-it
‘what was (~where it was) found is in Sidamo’
may be heard as equivalent to the simpler
‘it was found in Sidamo’.
In such sentences an exception to verb-
final order may occur, with the copular verb
in medial position followed by the noun clause:
i-ss
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w n
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w y-
ɑzz
@
z-u-t
he.pol is.he.pol Rel-ordered-he.pol-it
‘it is he who ordered it’ (‘he’s the one who ordered it’)
(That is, instead of verb-
final y-
ɑzz
@
z-u-t i-ss
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w n
ɑcˇcˇ
@
w.) Such word order may be
favoured for having the advantage for discourse of focusing, by moving forward (to the
right), the presupposition.
4.8 Adverb Clauses
These have a complementising
–subordinating prefix on the past or nonpast verb,
having meanings like
‘when’, ‘if’, ‘because’, etc. A common time clause is expressed
with the pre
fix s- ‘when’ (t- in northern dialects other than Gondar) and a common
conditional clause with the pre
fix b- ‘if’, both with the nonpast verb, as follows:
t
@
m
ɑri-w t’i-yyɑk’e s-i-t’
@
yyi-k
’
ɑst
@
m
ɑri-w ɑ-y-m
@
lli-s-i-m
student-the question when-he-ask teacher-the Neg-he-answer-Neg
‘when the student asks a question, the teacher doesn’t answer’
b-i-z
@
nb-i-m
ɑ-n-hed-m
if-it-rain-Top Neg-we-go-Neg
‘even if it rains we won’t go’
‘To be about to do’ is expressed as direct speech in a time clause with s- and the verb
‘say’, for example i-w
@
t
’
ɑlli-hu s-i-l ‘when he was about to go out’ (lit. ‘when he said
“I will go out”’).
Some adverbial clauses are expressed by prepositional pre
fixes plus the past form of
the verb, and with both a preposition and a postposition, for example, with k
@
-
‘if’,
i-yy
@
-
‘while’, k
@
-
…
˚ˇ
@
mmi-ro
‘since’ (
˚ˇ
@
mmi-r-o a usually
fixed Sg.3m. conjunct ‘he
beginning
’), b
@
-
… gize ‘when’, k
@
-
… b
@
h
w
ɑlɑ ‘after’ (b
@
-h
w
ɑlɑ lit. ‘at back’), k
@
-
…
b
@
fit ‘after’ (b
@
-
fit lit. ‘at front’). An example of the latter is:
AMHARIC
613
k
@
-z
@
nn
@
b
@
b
@
fit bet g
@
bb
ɑ-n
from-rained.it before house entered-we
‘before it rained, we entered the house’
Three adverb clauses are expressed by prepositional pre
fixes which occur only with the
past form of verbs or with the nonpast pre
fixed by mm- (the relative nonpast prefix less
y
@
-); these are i-nd
@
-
‘like, as’, si-l
@
-
‘because’ and i-sk
@
-
‘until’, as in i-ssu i-nd-
ɑl
@
‘like he
wrote
’ (with elision of
@
of i-nd
@
-), i-ssu si-l
@
-mm-i-s
’i-f ‘because he writes’, i-sk
@
-mm-i-d
@
rs
‘until he arrives’; i-sk- also constructs with the unprefixed nonpast: i-sk-i-m
@
t
’
ɑ ‘until he
comes
’.
Comparative clauses may employ relative and causative conjunct forms of the verbs
‘be less’ and ‘be more’, for example relative verb y-
ɑnn
@
s
@
‘which is less’ and conjugated
causative conjunct
ɑ-b
@
lt
’- ‘causing to be more’.
k
@
-n
ˇnˇ
ɑ y-ɑnn
@
s
@
i-nn
@
ssu s
@
rr-u
from-we Rel-is.less.it they did-they
‘they did less than us’
k
@
-n
ˇnˇ
ɑ i-sswɑ ɑ-b
@
lt
’-
ɑ tɑt’
@
n
ɑll
@
c
ˇcˇ
from-us she Caus-be.more-she she.studies
‘she studies more than us’
5 Writing
Amharic writing is a descendant of the ancient Ethiopic (Ge
‘ez) writing system known
from about 2500
BP
, and well attested in epigraphic records of the Aksumite Ethiopian
kingdom. Like other ancient Semitic writing systems this is descendant of an adaptation
of Egyptian hieroglyphic consonantal writing. Ethiopic was at
first a consonantal writ-
ing system; vowels were not represented. In time Ethiopic underwent popular adapta-
tion as graphs became less regular and angular, and eventually a practice of writing on
parchment-paper arose. Perhaps as an in
fluence of Greek writing, which was also
known in Aksum and employed in inscriptions and coins of the kingdom, about 1600
BP
Ethiopic began to be written from left-to-right, opposite that of most other Semitic
writing systems, and, about the same time, vowels began to be represented, as additions
or other modi
fication of the consonantal graphs.
For example, the graph for b
በ, descendant of the Egyptian hieroglyph of ‘house’ the
first phone of which word is b in Semitic (Amharic bet, Arabic b
ɑyt), was modified as
ቡ for bu, ቢ for bi, ቤ for be, etc. The original basic consonantal graph became the
representation of the consonant plus the most frequent vowel, so
በ is b
@
(originally b
ɑ,
but
ɑ later became
@
).
Upon the decline of Aksum after about 600
AD
, Ethiopic writing disappeared in
archaeology, to reappear around 1300
AD
in manuscripts of Ethiopian Orthodox
Christian religious literature and chronicles of kings. Shortly after this time a mod-
i
fied form of Ethiopic began to be used for writing Amharic. This required new graphs
for the Amharic palatalised coronals
š, ž, cˇ, cˇ’ and nˇ, and a graph for spirantised k,
or x, which weakened further as h. The Amharic writing system and its graphs are
termed
fidel.
AMHARIC
614
Subsequently, Ethiopic was adapted to write Tigrinya (of Eritrea and northern Ethiopia),
and recently Amharic writing has been adapted to write other Ethiopian languages
including some which have different consonants and long vowels. Amharic writing
today ful
fils all the needs of modern literate society. The problems of Amharic typewriting
including the large number of graphs and inappropriately small size of typescript have
been alleviated or corrected with the use of computer mediated writing.
Table 35.14 presents the 31 Amharic consonants of Table 35.1. Because of mergers
of formerly distinct sounds whose different graphs persist in the writing system, four
consonants have more than one graph: s and s
’ and
?
each have two, and h has four.
Table 35.14 Amharic Graphs in English Alphabetical Order
@
u
i
ɑ
e
(i-)
o
?
አ*
ኡ
ኢ
ኣ
ኤ
እ
ኦ
ዐ*
ዑ
ዒ
ዓ
ዔ
ዕ
ዖ
b
በ
ቡ
ቢ
ባ
ቤ
ብ
ቦ
c
ˇ
ቸ
ቹ
ቺ
ቻ
ቼ
ች
ቾ
c
ˇ’
ጨ
ጩ
ጪ
ጫ
ጬ
ጭ
ጮ
d
ደ
ዱ
ዲ
ዳ
ዴ
ድ
ዶ
f
ፈ
ፉ
ፊ
ፋ
ፌ
ፍ
ፎ
g
ገ
ጉ
ጊ
ጋ
ጌ
ግ
ጎ
g
w
ጐ
ጒ
ጓ
ጔ
ጕ
h
ሀ*
ሁ
ሂ
ሃ
ሄ
ህ
ሆ
ሐ*
ሑ
ሒ
ሓ
ሔ
ሕ
ሖ
ኸ
ኹ
ኺ
ኻ
ኼ
ኽ
ኾ
ኀ*
ኁ
ኂ
ኃ
ኄ
ኅ
ኆ
h
w
ኈ
ኊ
ኋ
ኌ
ኍ
˚ˇ
ጀ
ጁ
ጂ
ጃ
ጄ
ጅ
ጆ
k
ከ
ኩ
ኪ
ካ
ኬ
ክ
ኮ
k
w
ዀ
ዂ
ዃ
ዄ
ዅ
k
’
ቀ
ቁ
ቂ
ቃ
ቄ
ቅ
ቆ
k
w
’
ቈ
ቊ
ቋ
ቌ
ቍ
l
ለ
ሉ
ሊ
ላ
ሌ
ል
ሎ
m
መ
ሙ
ሚ
ማ
ሜ
ም
ሞ
n
ነ
ኑ
ኒ
ና
ኔ
ን
ኖ
n
ˇ
ኘ
ኙ
ኚ
ኛ
ኜ
ኝ
ኞ
p
ፐ
ፑ
ፒ
ፓ
ፔ
ፕ
ፖ
p
’
ጰ
ጱ
ጲ
ጳ
ጴ
ጵ
ጶ
r
ረ
ሩ
ሪ
ራ
ሬ
ር
ሮ
s
ሰ
ሱ
ሲ
ሳ
ሴ
ስ
ሶ
ሠ
ሡ
ሢ
ሣ
ሤ
ሥ
ሦ
s
’
ጸ
ጹ
ጺ
ጻ
ጼ
ጽ
ጾ
ፀ
ፁ
ፂ
ፃ
ፄ
ፅ
ፆ
š
ሸ
ሹ
ሺ
ሻ
ሼ
ሽ
ሾ
t
ተ
ቱ
ቲ
ታ
ቴ
ት
ቶ
ť
ጠ
ጡ
ጢ
ጣ
ጤ
ጥ
ጦ
w
ወ
ዉ
ዊ
ዋ
ዌ
ው
ዎ
y
የ
ዩ
ዪ
ያ
ዬ
ይ
ዮ
z
ዘ
ዙ
ዚ
ዛ
ዜ
ዝ
ዞ
ž
ዠ
ዡ
ዢ
ዣ
ዤ
ዥ
ዦ
Note: * 1st-order vowel is
ɑ
not
@
.
AMHARIC
615
Each of the resulting 37 graphs has seven shapes, one for each of the seven vowels of
Table 35.2 (termed
‘1st-order’, ‘2nd-order’, etc.), except for the labiovelars which have
only
five. Because the pharyngeal and laryngeal consonants (which merged as h or
?
)
lowered a following vowel
@
to
ɑ, the basic graphs of these have ɑ where other consonants
have
@
(marked with asterisks in Table 35.14).
The 37 graphs (
fidel) are read as simple syllables consisting of the consonant and a
vowel, except for 6th-order graphs. Vowels are extensions and/or modi
fications of the
1st-order consonant graph, in four largely regular patterns seen in Table 35.15, which
shows the consonants t, b, t
’ and m representative of 1-legged, 2-legged, 3-legged and
legless graphs, respectively.
The parentheses around i- of the 6th-form graphs
– t(i-), b(i-), t’(i-) and m(i-) – show that
these may be read with the vowel (the epenthetic vowel, with exceptions) or without it.
Thus
ልብ ‘heart’ with two 6th-order graphs is li-bb.
Although a graph is usually read as a syllable, Ethiopic is not a syllabic writing system (as
is Japanese kana for example), because the vowels, although attached, are systematically
recognisable apart from the consonants, just as in a so-called alphabetic system like
English.
Similarities of graphs of Greek and Ethiopic writing (and Amharic, derived from
Ethiopic) are owed to shared descent from Egyptian, for example Greek
Β and Ethiopic
በ, C and ገ, K and ለ, and R and ሠ. Direct influence of Greek is seen in comparison of
the Ethiopic-Amharic and Greek numbers, in Table 35.16. Similarities of Greek and
Ethiopic are particularly apparent for 2, 3, 9, 10, 80 and 100.
In two ways Ethiopic-Amharic writing fails to express the phonological contrasts of
Amharic. Long and short consonants, which are contrastive between vowels and at the
end of words, are written the same. Thus
ɑl
@
‘he said’ and
ɑll
@
‘he is present’ are both
written
አለ; and bb of ልብ li-bb ‘heart’ and b of ጀብ
˚ˇ
i-b
‘hyena’ are both written ብ. The
second failing has fewer but occasional manifestations: within a word before another
consonant a 6th-order graph may be ambiguous between the consonant with and
without i-: thus moti-
š ‘your (Sg.f.) death’ and motš ‘you (Sg.f) died’ are both ሞትሸ.
Table 35.15 Four Patterns of Vowel Modification
1 leg
ተ
ቱ
ቲ
ታ
ቴ
ት
ቶ
t
@
tu
ti
t
ɑ
te
t(i-)
to
2 legs
በ
ቡ
ቢ
ባ
ቤ
ብ
ቦ
b
@
bu
bi
b
ɑ
be
b(i-)
bo
3 legs
ጠ
ጡ
ጢ
ጣ
ጤ
ጥ
ጦ
ť
ťu
ťi
ť
ɑ
ťe
ť(i-)
ťo
no legs
መ
ሙ
ሚ
ማ
ሜ
ም
ሞ
m
@
mu
mi
m
ɑ
me
m(i-)
mo
Table 35.16 Ethiopic Numbers Compared to Greek
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
፩
፪
፫
፬
፭
፮
፯
፰
፱
፲
a
b
c
d
e
r
f
g
h
i
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
፲
፳
፴
፵
፶
፷
፸
፹
፺
፻
i
j
k
m
¨
n¨
n
o
p
j
q
AMHARIC
616
Bibliography
The most thorough grammar of Amharic is Leslau (1995), although Dawkins (1969) is very ef
ficient
for getting the basics. The most thorough Amharic
–English dictionary is Kane (1990), and the most
thorough English
–Amharic dictionary Leslau (1973). For learners a good bilingual dictionary is
Leslau (1975). The most thorough textbook remains Leslau (1967), although Appleyard (1995) pro-
vides the best introduction for learners. Advanced students of Amharic language and society will
find
valuable the readings in Leslau and Kane (2001). An informative study of Amharic usage in Ethiopian
schools and society is Meyer and Richter (2003).
References
Appleyard, D. 1995. Colloquial Amharic (Routledge, London)
Dawkins, C.H. 1969. The Fundamentals of Amharic (Sudan Interior Mission, Addis Ababa)
Kane, T. L. 1990. Amharic
–English Dictionary, 2 vols (Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden)
Leslau, W. 1967. Amharic Textbook (Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden)
—— 1973. English–Amharic Context Dictionary (Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden)
—— 1975. Concise Amharic Dictionary (Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden)
—— 1995. Reference Grammar of Amharic (Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden)
Leslau, W., and Kane, T. 2001. Amharic Cultural Reader (Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden)
Meyer, R. and Richter, R. 2003. Language Use in Ethiopia from a Network Perspective. Schriften zur
Afrikanistic Band 7 (Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main)
AMHARIC
617