TABLE OF CONTENTS

UFO Experiences

The Early Astronomers

The Concept of Time

The Dimensions of Time

Gravitons and Flying Saucers

The Physics of Time

- Gravitational, Electric

and Magnetic Timefields

A Unified Field Theory

The Physics of a Flying Saucer

The Philadelphia Experiment

and Noah's Ark

1
0

. A Glimpse into the Future

108

Appendix

References

Bibliography

Chapter 1

UFO Experiences

t was about 3am. The distant sound of barking dogs echoed
across the still valley where the small farmhouse was lo-

cated, in the South Island Of New Zealand. This small farm-
house was to be the setting for a holiday for a friend's
mother. She was not to realise that her life would be changed
forever by the events about to unfold.

As she rolled over in her bed she felt uncomfortable, a
strange feeling that people often get when someone is looking
at them from behind. She decided to get up and have a drink
of water.

As she reached the kitchen, with its views out across the val-
ley, she noticed a bright silver object about 50m in front of
the farmhouse. She rushed to the kitchen window. It was a
flying saucer. It was triangular in side elevation and about
10m in diameter.

Within seconds of her seeing the saucer, it rose gently above
the ground, and then with the majesty of a thorough under-
standing of gravity and the laws of nature, tilted slightly and

silently, and within a few seconds and at high speed, disap-
peared into the clouds. It was an amazing experience and one
she will never forget.

This experience is typical of thousands of reported sightings
of UFO's around the world.

If these machines are real and not imagined, then the occu-
pants have a far superior understanding of the laws of nature
than we do.

This subject has fascinated me from a young age. My first
conscious interest in flying saucers occurred during a
lunchtime talk on the subject by a lecturer in Veterinary Sci-
ence at Sydney University, when I was studying Civil Engi-
neering. It occurred to me at the time that if flying saucers
were real there would be major scientific, technological and
theological ramifications. The interest in the subject has
stayed with me ever since. Dismissing the subject as so many
have because it is portrayed in the media and by many scien-
tists as "paraphysical", is not a satisfactory or adequate ex-
planation to many people. Most major discoveries, such as
the Earth not being flat, or the Sun being the centre of the
Solar System were ridiculed and considered "abnormal" hy-
potheses at their beginning. Scientific understanding of a
subject should not be influenced by peer pressure either by
the media, other scientists or the community at large. It
should be determined by rational argument.

Since my early interest, was aroused in (lying saucers, I have
read books on the subject that appeared to have substance

and taken an interest in finding out the experiences of
friends and their acquaintances who claim to have seen, or
had close friends who have seen, them.

Another friend who has seen a flying saucer is a civil engi-
neer. He was driving along with his father on a country road
in New Zealand when a flying saucer tracked along side the
vehicle for about 30 seconds, then sped off at right angles and
up into the clouds and disappeared.

I have begun with these cases because I know the calibre of
the witnesses and their personal accounts verify to me that
at least some of the observations of others on flying saucers
recorded throughout history have credibility.

Another friend with an experience related to flying saucers
was a former missionary in Papua New Guinea. The incident
is famous and was an "Encounter of the Third Kind", that
had a large number of witnesses. More than one sighting oc-
curred and they took place on 26th and 27th June 1959. Al-
though my missionary friend was not a witness to seeing the
flying saucers, she spoke to people who were at the Boainai
Mission Station headed by the Reverend William Booth Gill,
an Anglican minister. The case is famous and is outlined in
"The UFO Experience. A Scientific Inquiry" by Dr J Allen
Hynek.

Rev. Gill writes "Last night we at Boainai experienced about
4 hours of UFO activity, and there is no doubt whatsoever
that they are handled by beings of some kind. At times it was
absolutely breathtaking....".

Extracts from Rev. Gill's notebook as detailed in Dr Hynek's

book reveal a number of flying saucers;

"All UFO's very clear. 'Mother' ship still large, clear, station-
ary....At 7:20 the UFO went through the clouds, right

through ....Others were coming and going through the

clouds...They were descending through the clouds and the
glow of the discs was reflected at the base of the clouds, and
then they would go in through the cloud again, and they
seemed to enjoy doing that."

And he continues...."Then came the next night, and this was
the interesting one. A large UFO was sighted by one of the

nurses at the hospital at 6:00 P.M .... we were walking , and

this thing came down to what we estimated as the closest we
had seen it.... Somewhere between 300 to 500 feet....It was
not dark, and we could see it quite clearly. It was still bright
and sparkling, but it seemed very near and clear. And there

was this figure again on the decking.....And so we waved

....and the thing waved back. And then Eric, who was with

me ... waved his two arms, along with another lad, and then

the figures waved two arms back."

I recently contacted Rev. Gill and he confirmed the sightings
and his meeting with Dr Hynek.

Another "Close Encounter Of The Third Kind" where there
were a number of witnesses was the Walton Experience.

Travis Walton worked with six other timber cutters in
Arizona's Apache Sitgreaves National Forest. On Wednesday
the 5th November 1975 they had completed a hard day's
work and at sunset began their drive back through the forest
towards home.

As their pick-up truck weaved its way along the mountain
road, they saw a bright shining object through the trees.
They passed an evergreen thicket and there it was in
front of them.

"A flying saucer" one of them yelled as their truck came to a
halt.

Travis Walton in his book 'The Walton Experience' contin-
ues " There, a mere ninety feet away, a strange, golden disc

hovered silently ......I estimated the thing to have an overall

diameter of fifteen feet, and be about eight or ten feet

thick ..... There was no motion and no sound from the craft. It

almost appeared to be dead in the air."

Travis Walton became curious. He got out of the truck and
hurriedly started towards the hovering flying saucer. As he
came closer he moved more slowly. "I was about six feet away

from being directly under the machine...... I stared up at the

unbelievably smooth, unblemished surface of the curving
hull."

He could hear sounds from within the craft and the saucer
started to wobble, although the same side stayed towards
him. It remained hovering in the same space while it
wobbled.

Walton was then hit by a blue-green ray from the bottom of
the craft that felt like a high voltage electrocution. He was
knocked out and totally oblivious to anything further. His
other six mates in the truck after seeing the awesome sight
started the truck and headed down the road as fast as they

could.

After a short while they decided to stop the truck and go back
to recover Walton. It was sunset and one of the loggers then
spotted the golden disc through the trees. "It had raised itself
vertically to treetop level and streaked away towards the
north-east at an incredible speed." When the loggers arrived
back at the spot, Travis Walton was missing. The locals ac-
cused the loggers of murdering Walton and they came under
the closest of scrutiny.

Local authorities organised a full scale search. They combed
the area for Walton's body. They checked the site for radia-
tion with a Geiger counter, but only found background radia-
tion. Polygraph tests were completed on all the timber work-
ers to check if they had fabricated the story. They were con-
cerned that Walton had been the victim of foul play. The
polygraph tests proved that the story of the loggers was gen-
uine.

Another investigator checked the area for other anomalies.
He found "electromagnetic readings of 10 gauss above the
normal magnetic field in the trees and brush at the site."

Five days later Travis Walton regained consciousness on the
edge of a road 10 miles from his initial abduction. As he woke
he saw a flying saucer "little more than a dozen yards away".
It was about 40 feet in diameter and hovering about four feet
above the pavement. He goes on to say "For an instant it
floated silently above the road", it had a..."smooth unblem-
ished hull..... Then, abruptly, it shot

vertically

into the sky,

creating a strong breeze that stirred the nearby pine boughs
and the dry oak leaves that lay in the dry grass on the side of

the road.... The most striking thing about its departure was
its quietness ....it was totally silent."

Travis Walton later passes a polygraph test on his experi-
ence.

This is a typical close encounter observation. It is interesting
because there were six witnesses besides Walton. They all
initially saw the flying saucer. Nobody has been able to deny
or break the witnesses' account. The flying saucer Walton fi-
nally saw was different to the one the timber workers saw in
the forest when Walton was abducted. Under hypnoses Wal-
ton reveals he was taken to a "mother ship" where he ap-
pears to have been medically checked over by aliens before
being returned to the road five days later.

These sightings of flying saucers are similar to thousands of
others, throughout history.

From the Bible, one of the earliest records is found in Ezekiel
1. Ezekiel's account is as follows;

" I looked, and saw a windstorm coming out of the north....
an immense cloud with flashing lightning and surrounded by
brilliant light. The centre of the fire looked like glowing
metal, and in the fire was what looked like four living crea-
tures. In appearance their form was that of a man. Their legs
were straight; their feet were like those of a calf feet and
gleamed like burnished bronze."

Is this a description of flying machines controlled by space-
men?

Ezekiel continues,

"..Each one went straight ahead. Wherever the spirit would
go, they would go, without turning as they went ...... The crea-
tures sped back and forth like flashes of lightning."

Ezekiel then goes on to talk further about the machines. In
verse 19 "When the living creatures moved, the wheels beside
them moved; and when the living creatures rose from the
ground, the wheels also rose. Whenever the spirit would go,
they would go, and the wheels would rise along with them,
because the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels.
When the creatures moved, they also moved; when the crea-
tures stood still, they also stood still; and when the creatures
rose from the ground, the wheels rose along with them, be-
cause the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels .....

When the creatures moved, I heard the sound of their wings,
like the roar of rushing waters..."

Ask someone without any knowledge of today's technology to
give a description of flying saucers, their occupants and mo-
tion. Ezekiel has given a very good description.

There are other numerous accounts in the Old Testament
that describe angels (or aliens?) and flying saucer-like ob-
jects. For instance God sent an angel to Moses in Exodus 3:2

"There the angel of the Lord appeared to him in flames of fire
from within a bush. Moses saw that though the bush was on
fire it did not burn up." This was very similar to Travis Wal-
ton's account of what the timber workers first saw through
the undergrowth when they encountered their flying saucer.
A voice goes on to tell Moses, "So 1 have come down to rescue

them (the Israelites) from the hand of the Egyptians."

Is the burning bush a glowing saucer in a thicket of bushes
that comes from a place in the sky?

In Exodus 13:21 the Israelites' instructions fleeing the Egyp-
tians, were to follow a cloud. Moses states:

"By day the Lord went ahead of them in a pillar of cloud to
guide them on their way and by night in a pillar of fire to
give them light. Neither the pillar of cloud by day nor the pil-
lar of fire by night left its place in front of the people."

During the day the flying saucer looked cloudlike, at night it
shone, and it always hovered in front to guide the Israelites
to the chosen land.

There are many references to angels and descriptions of fly-
ing saucer-like objects in the New Testament as well.

Throughout Matthew and Luke in the New Testament the
angels are identified as having organised the virgin birth of
Christ. In Luke 1 Verse 26 (NIV) it states;

"In the sixth month, God sent the angel Gabriel to Nazareth,
a town in Galilee, to a virgin pledged to be married to a man
named Joseph, a descendent of David. The virgin's name was
Mary. The angel went to her and said, 'Greetings, you who
are highly favoured! The Lord is with you.' Mary was greatly
troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greetings
this might be. But the angel said to her, 'Do not be afraid,
Mary, you have found favour with God. You will be with child
and give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Je-

sus.......... ' 'How will this be,' Mary asked the angel, 'since I

am a virgin?'. The angel answered, 'The holy spirit will come
upon you....' "

It appears Jesus was conceived by in-vitro fertilisation, as
was John the Baptist (Luke 1).

The star the wise men followed to Bethlehem has to be a fly-
ing saucer. Consider the facts. Matthew 2 verse 9 (NIV)
states;

"After they (the wise men) had heard the king, they went on
their way, and the star they had seen in the east went ahead
of them until it stopped over the place where the child (Jesus)
was."

How could a star, comet or planet such as Jupiter or Saturn
behave in such a manner. Planets and stars do not stop over
a building. The "star" Matthew is referring to is obviously
controlled by an intelligent source, and that has to be the an-
gels, or aliens as we call them, and the "star" has to be some
form of flying saucer.

The "star" was able to move slowly for the wise men, who
were probably travelling on foot or donkey, to follow. The
"star" then hovered over the stable where Jesus was born.

If we were asked to describe such an event in biblical times,
we would also describe it as a "star". Any other term would
not be part of the vocabulary. However it was obviously more
than a heavenly star, it was a flying saucer.

Why would anyone make up a story about a moving star that

was able to be followed and then hovered over a stable? If it
were not true it would only discredit the writer's message.

So angels had a major part in the Christian religion. It must
have been they who controlled the "star" that identified the
location of the new born Jesus.

Rev Dr Barry H Downing has written an excellent book titled
"The Bible And Flying Saucers". When he wrote the book in
1973 he was Pastor of Northminister Presbyterian Church,
Endwell, New York. He received a B.A. degree from Hartwick
College where he majored in physics, a B.D. degree from
Princeton Theological College and a PhD from the University
of Edinburgh, New College where he specialised in the rela-
tion between science and religion.

In the forward to the British edition of his book Rev Dr
Downing states;

" I am more convinced than ever that the Biblical faith was
strongly influenced by, if not deliberately caused by, beings
from another world, wherever and whatever that world may
be."

On page P52 he says " If flying saucers do exist, ........ then I

dare to say that the course of theology may be radically
changed. If flying saucers do not exist, then much theology
will probably continue its present course which leads down
the road to the death of God."

The Greeks and Romans also record descriptions of
"phantom chariots", and "flying shields"

in the sky.

Flying saucer sightings have been recorded since these earli-
est civilisations from every continent. These recorded sight-
ings share common features and observations, from wit-
nesses that cut across all educational, cultural and religious
lines.

We should all be very grateful to those who have had the
courage to express their views. Their experiences have en-
couraged me to examine the physics of the motion of flying
saucers and to identify a new set of hypotheses that explain
their motion. It has been a trying, but rewarding experience
with revolutionary outcomes, that I believe show that our
current understanding of physics, technology and even the
universe itself is primitive and grossly flawed.

The journey I will take you on is far more intriguing and in-
volved than the physics of a flying saucer. Once an under-
standing of gravity is achieved then a whole new world of ex-
citing theories evolve. They lead along the path of star wars,
unified field theories, intergalactic travel and even a different
understanding of the Earth's history and theology.

Like all technologies there are enormous dangers. However,
the potential of this physics if used wisely, has enormous ad-
vantages in developing exciting new technologies to eliminate
the use of fossil fuels with clean energy, control of the
weather, the development of new materials and elimination
of toxic products.

To handle these new technologies we also will have to
develop a new understanding of how we deal with each other,
and with other people and nations.

Chapter 2

The Early Astronomers

Let us begin with the early astronomers' theories.

Up until the time of the Renaissance and astronomer
Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543), the universally accepted
belief was that the Earth was stationary at the centre of the
universe and the Sun and planets moved with the com-
pounded affect of small epicycles inside larger circles around
the Earth. This was an obvious explanation. The Sun and
planets crossed the sky each evening and their observed mo-
tion fitted the explanation put forward by Ptolemy.

The philosophy behind this explanation was that what is
seen by the observer is an accurate version in determining
nature's actual structure. It should not be mocked because
this is the basis of many of our current laws of physics and is
still a problem in our current thinking, as I will explain later.

Copernicus, however, proposed that the Sun was stationary
and that it was the centre of the motion of the planets. This
was a very revolutionary way of understanding nature. It re-
quired the observer to consider the physics of the universe

from another position, other than his own, in space, namely
that of the Sun. Most astronomers of the day considered his
ideas hypothetical and without any claim for accepted reality.

It was the following century from 1600 to 1618 that Jo-
hannes Kepler developed his three laws of planetary motion
by expanding on the observations of the astronomer Tycho
and concluded that the planets orbit the Sun, not in circles as
predicted by Copernicus, but in elliptical orbits. His other two
laws were also based on observations of planetary motion.
His views were still not widely accepted.

It is fascinating today that with the thousands of credible ob-
servations of flying saucers to date, few professional scien-
tists have considered the physics of a flying saucer and even
fewer governments or universities are prepared to consider
such research. In fact the subject is put in the same category
by them as witchcraft and astrology. It should only have
taken one credible sighting to warrant a major research pro-
gram. Of course this leads to the obvious conclusion that re-
search programs are occurring and that there is a major
cover-up.

Surely if flying saucers exist, then an understanding of the
physics of their motion must be critical to our technological
development. It must also be obvious that this new physics
must satisfy the physics of the motion of the planets and that
the current physics used to explain planetary motion has
shortcomings.

Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) was famous for his pioneering
telescope, and his observations of the moons of Jupiter and
his conclusion that all objects fall at the same rate in a gravi-

tational field. His support for the Sun-centred theory of
Copernicus was not accepted by the Church and other intel-
lectuals of the day. He was tried by the Inquisition, found
guilty, and spent the latter part of his life under house arrest.
His sentence was considered light. Many others with the
same view were burnt at the stake.

Before we condemn the authorities in Galileo's time, we
should first examine the mind set of humans in authoritative
positions regardless of the time. There is a major cover-up in
our own time on UFO's. It has not only involved 'negative
marketing' on the subject by Government agencies, but there
have been a number of scientists and others working in sensi-
tive areas of physics involving astrophysics, astronomy, elec-
tronics and communications who have had unfortunate and
unexplained deaths. There was a group of 19 scientists in
Britain, the USA and Australia who have had unexplained
deaths, and then there are numerous and blatant cover-ups
involving such agencies as NASA and their Mars probes con-
cerning the "Face On Mars", for example, that leave an air of
suspicion concerning bureaucrats everywhere.

A *Pending Patent (see Appendix) I recently submitted to the
patent authorities in Australia, involves ten inventions for
machines in gravitational, electric and magnetic fields. It was
confiscated by the Australian Defence Department and the
Australian Safeguards Office on application to the patent of-
fice and held for two months. The pending patent comprised
the physics of flying saucers and other applications using the
Unified Field Theory and 6 dimensional space time. If there
is no cover-up, why all the interest?

Many people know that the cover-up extends to well above

top secret in the USA and Britain. A former General in the
Soviet Union has confided with acquaintances of mine that
the knowledge of "flying saucers" was the major reason for
the disintegration of the communist system in his country.
He claimed the game they were playing in military technol-
ogy with the USA was futile, costly, dangerous and irrelevant
when compared to the knowledge they know exists with
"flying saucers" and their makers.

The next major discoverer involving the physics of gravity af-
ter Galileo was Isaac Newton who, in 1679, on the insistence
of Edmond Halley, developed his famous Laws of Motions.
These laws were the result of analysing the laws of planetary
motion discovered by Kepler, and assumed that the planets
were held in place by a force due to gravity which emanates
from the Sun and all matter.

And so it is today that Newton's Laws are used universally to
design bridges and skyscrapers, to determine the motion of
the spaceshuttle in orbit around the Earth and to send space-
craft to Mars and Pluto. For the vast majority of practical ap-
plications where laws of motion are required by engineers,
Newtonian physics appears completely satisfactory. They are
the laws that appear to be occurring to the observer
(ourselves)

other objects. It requires the thinking of Coper-

nicus in relation to laws of motion for us to begin to under-
stand the physics of a flying saucer. In other words, what ap-
pears to be the forces acting on another mass or nuclear par-
ticle may not be the reality to that mass or particle.

My introduction has purposely not included Einstein, because
his Theories of Special and General Relativity are part of my
journey of revelation.

Astronomy

My interest in astronomy commenced one fine Saturday
morning about 12 years ago, when I noticed an add in the
Telegraph in Sydney for a telescope. On inquiring, the seller
wanted $120. It seemed like a good buy. I bundled the family
into the car and headed to the other side of Sydney. The tele-
scope had belonged to a deceased estate and was dissembled
and in a large wooden box. I bought it, and over the following
weeks and months spent whatever spare time I had cleaning,
assembling, focusing and observing the heavens. It went with
us everywhere, even to our beach house.

Saturn is a fascinating planet to observe through a telescope,
especially for the first time. It looks like a toy made from a
ball inside a ring without any support and suspended in the
sky as if put there by a magician. It is surrounded by a sea of
brighter, twinkling stars which turn out to have little form
other than being point dots of light. It has an air of tranquil-
lity, a presence of beauty and perfection, as well as being
awesome in complexity.

Jupiter is like a mini solar system. Through the telescope we
could see 4,5 and sometimes 6 moons. It is a bright planet,
little wonder that Galileo, after observing Jupiter, was so
convinced that all heavenly bodies did not rotate around the
Earth.

And then there is the Moon, this sole mate of the Earth. It
has so much character. It glides across the sky with a silent
elegance and beauty and yet through a telescope it has the
battle scars of a career rugby player. Its craters tell a history
of cosmic collisions of massive proportions and yet it remains

suspended in the heavens without the slightest need of any
help.

And so it was one clear night when Saturn, Jupiter and the
Moon were on show that I sat back from my telescope on the
front lawn after observing them and I thought to myself

" ..... These planets move with so much harmony....... whether

it's Saturn or Jupiter or the Moon. To say they are held in
place by a massive force due to gravity and countered by a

centrifugal force due to their circular motion.... it's hard to ac-

cept... Maybe there are no forces acting on the planets to
keep them in place. Why would Nature make a universe
where everything was held in place with massive forces. But
how could it be so? Newtonian physics has stood the test of

time ........if there are no forces on the planets .... then gravity

is not a force .....centrifugal forces are also not forces..... ?????'

The questions went on and on....I thought about it day and

night. I would wake in my sleep thinking about it ......the

question was how could it be so?

Engineers are considered practical people, especially those
who have studied and practised civil engineering. To them
Newton is God, and Newtonian physics is carved in stone.
His laws of physics have stood the test of time. They are the
foundation of engineering thought. To question their authen-
ticity is akin to questioning a religion's fundamental beliefs.
To say that Newton's Laws are based on incorrect assump-
tions and that there are no forces acting on the planets and
that gravity is not a force, is not acceptable to most engi-
neers. But this is what I was proposing.

If gravity is not a force, then what is it?

Fortunately my understanding of Einsteinian physics was
limited. In Engineering at Sydney University, which I had
studied thirty years ago, Einsteinian physics was only men-
tioned in our final second year physics lecture. Special Rela-
tivity was briefly discussed and the formula for the change in
time on a mass travelling near the speed of light was covered.
General Relativity was mentioned in one sentence as another
theory on gravity, but dismissed as being impractical for our
use and not relevant for common applications encounted by
engineers.

1 say it was "fortunate" that General Relativity was not in
the physics theory covered in my engineering degree
because I may have accepted it as the final answer to
gravitational fields and not continued on the journey I am
taking you on. General Relativity is very complex and theo-
retical and has frightened too many thinkers away.

So when I began my lateral thought process, I had a scant
knowledge that a mass changes its rate of time relative to a
stationary body when it increases its velocity, and it was
from this premise that my hypothesis evolved.

I decided to study the relationship between the Earth and the
Moon. The difference between them appeared only to be the
Moon's relative velocity to the Earth. As a result of the mo-
tion of the Moon and its location relative to the Earth, some-
how the Moon then developed a circular motion about the
Earth.

I began reading books on Einsteinian physics to try and de-
velop the next stage in my thought process. I started from
the obvious and that being the difference between the Moon's

orbit and the Earth's orbit around the Sun was the relative
motion of the Moon around the Earth, and that obviously cre-
ated a time change on the particles of the Moon relative to
those on the Earth. But what about the Earth! How did the
Earth have an effect on the Moon?

Some books were very informative, like Nigel Calder's
"Einstein's Universe", and others became embroiled in com-
plex mathematics of four dimensional space-time. My view
was that the equations of motion had to be simple, like New-
tonian physics. Newtonian physics is not four dimensional,
it's simple and easily understood. It basically uses one dimen-
sional space and the concept of force.

It became obvious that an understanding of time was nec-
essary to have an understanding of the laws of motion. So
what is time?

We all know how to tell the time. We experience the passing
of an hour, a day, a year, a life time. But what about the rate
of time?

The rate of time varies throughout the universe. That does
not mean that a second is longer or shorter to people at dif-
ferent locations, it means that relative to another point in
space the rate of time is different. For example, as an object
approaches a mass like the Earth its rate of time slows down.
Also the rate of time slows down as a mass increases its ve-
locity.

The

US Navy and Carroll Alley from the University of Mary-

land demonstrated in September 1975 and January 1976
over Chesapeake Bay how time changes. They showed that

the rate of time of a clock can change by synchronising a
number of atomic clocks at the surface of the Earth and car-
rying out various experiments. Some of the clocks were re-
tained as a reference, others were taken to different altitudes
above the Earth and others flown at varying speeds. They
proved using the clocks that a mass increases its rate of time
as it moves away from the Earth and that it reduces its rate
of time as its velocity increases.

Although the Chesapeake Bay Experiment was hailed as ver-
ifying Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, I did not see it
that way. I was looking for experiments and literature that
outlined how the Earth was creating some change in the cos-
mos that balanced the motion due to the Moon. My conclu-
sion was time change.

I decided to postulate the theory that the Earth's gravita-
tional field was a variable time-field and that the change in
time of the Earth's gravitational time-field at the radius of
the Moon balances the time change on the particles of the
Moon due to its motion. There was no force due to gravity
from the Earth and no centrifugal force to balance any gravi-
tational force. The Moon stayed in its orbit because of the
harmony of time.

1 put this together, along with a bunch of formulae, and made
an appointment to see an Associate Professor in Applied
Mathematics at my old university. I thought I would be
blown out of the water when I suggested the planets had no
forces acting on them. To my utter surprise he agreed. When
I asked why I had been taught that there were forces holding

the planets and other heavenly bodies in place his reply with
a smile was "It's all theory. Accepting that no forces are act-
ing on the planets, appears to give the most accurate results.
Einsteinian physics assumes there are no forces on the plan-
ets, they move with the persuasion of 4 dimensional space-
time. The concept of gravitational and centrifugal forces act-
ing on the planets leads to Newtonian physics and this makes
applied maths simple to teach engineers".

I then spent a brief time going through my theory. Without
finding anything wrong with the logic and mathematics, he
concluded however that I was wrong because the change of
time on the Moon from Einsteinian physics was twice what I
had predicted.

Well an engineer is not stopped by a simple factor of two. On
my way home in the car I realised where the factor of two
came in. If the Moon was stationary at its current radius
then it would have a time change "dt" due to the Earth's
gravitational field. If it then increased its velocity to balance
that time change it must have a total time change of "2dt".

I could not understand why my theory was so readily re-
jected. It wasn't the factor of two that was of concern, it was
how readily the hypothesis was dismissed because of the fac-
tor of two. Obviously Einsteinian physics was now gospel and
any excuse to reject other hypotheses was found. Maybe peo-
ple were continually coming up with misplaced hypotheses
and he had more important work to do.

The Professor's reason for so readily dismissing my hypothe-

sis reminded me of a joke.

There was once a mathematician who had a beautiful daugh-
ter and decided he wanted to keep her virtuous. So he de-
vised a 'mathematical condition' for potential suitors to see
her. The condition was basically that whatever the distance
between the suitor and the daughter, the suitor could never
come closer than halfway on each successive move towards
the daughter.

The first suitor to ask the daughter out was a young lawyer.
When he called to see the daughter, the father outlined the
conditions. The mathematics for the lawyer was too complex
so he decided to explore other pastures. The second suitor
was a young scientist. He analysed the mathematics and
came to the conclusion it was an impossibility to reach the
daughter. No matter how close he came to the daughter, he
concluded, the distance could always be divided by two and it
was impossible therefore to reach her. He gave up without
trying. The father was very pleased, his daughter was safe.

Then came the third suitor, a young engineer. He analysed
the problem and decided to take on the challenge. He halved
the first distance, then halved the distance left, then halved
the remaining distance and did the same a half dozen more
times.... and then concluded that he was close enough for all
practical purposes.

A solution had been found to the amazement of the father.

The experience of each stage of any journey is always the im-
portant part of a trip and so it was with this journey in
physics. The exciting part was determining where it could
lead to. Most trips are planned and the end destination is
known. Some hypotheses in physics end at the beginning,
others are a fascinating venture. This was beginning to be
the latter. It will be up to others to judge its merit.

I had made several major breakthroughs in my understand-
ing of the motion of the planets in that it was currently
acceptable in academic circles, albeit within the Theory of
General Relativity and 4 dimensional space-time, that no
forces act on the planets. It also appeared, again in my opin-
ion, that my analysis of using "time" in a linear concept simi-
lar to the way "force" is used in Newtonian Physics had some
foundation. And I think the other major breakthrough was
being prepared to question theories that are taught at school
and university as though they are absolute.

Chapter 3

The Concept of Time

The concept of "time" is often difficult to grasp. Although it is
associated with our understanding of time on a clock, this is
an outward measurement. Time is related to motion.

Consider a journey in an aeroplane. As the aircraft increases its
velocity, an acceleration is felt until a constant speed is reached.
Once the craft reaches a constant velocity it is possible to re-
move the seat belt and walk around the cabin as if stationary on
the ground. Only if there is turbulence, a change in the direction
of motion of the plane, or a window to view passing clouds, is it
realised that the plane is not stationary on the ground. The pas-
sengers and the plane have changed their velocity and in so do-
ing, their unit of time. All else is the same.

Consider also a raft floating down a uniformly flowing river. If
the river has a constant velocity then the raft travels with the
same velocity. The raft requires no motor to stay with the flow.
No force is required for any floating debris to stay with the flow.
The raft reaches a constant velocity and maintains it. In others
words the raft and its occupants reach a constant time change

and no force is required to maintain that time change.

The river is not a force field to the raft, it is a constant veloc-
ity field, or in time physics, a constant time field. The parti-
cles making up the river are all travelling at a constant time.
The raft is in the field and requires no force to maintain its
velocity.

It may appear to an observer on the bank of the river that
the raft is being carried down the river and is therefore being
pushed down by a force, but to the raft no force is required.
Someone falling out of the raft would be carried down the
river along with the raft. Rubbish thrown out of the raft
would travel with the raft.

If the occupants of the raft decide to stop in the flow of the
river by tying up to an old tree stump, then a force is re-
quired between the stump and the raft via a rope to prevent
the raft moving in the river. So a force is required to stop the
raft in the river, not to keep it moving with the flow.

If the raft on its voyage down the river starts going over some
rapids, it, along with the water in the river begin to acceler-
ate. Again the occupants feel no force. They naturally go with
the flow.

Consider now a capsule falling freely, without air friction be-
ing considered, towards the Earth. An observer on the
Earth's surface considers the capsule to be under the influ-
ence of a force because it is accelerating at 'g' m/sec/sec. How-
ever an occupant of the capsule experiences no forces and is
weightless. Any unrestrained water bubbles in the capsule
form perfect spheres and float in the capsule. Only when the

occupant of the capsule looks out of the window and observes
the Earth rushing up towards him does he realise he is accel-
erating towards the Earth.

So what is happening to the capsule and its contents? They
are falling through a variable time field which we call the
gravitational field.

To say that the capsule has a force acting on it equal to its
mass times the gravitational acceleration, as in Newtonian
physics, is incorrect. The occupant feels no force.

Physics formulae should satisfy both the observer and the ob-
ject. In the case of the falling capsule, the occupant feels no
forces on him, but the observer on the ground says there is a
force because the capsule is accelerating towards him. How-
ever it is the observer on the ground who is like the observer
on the stationary raft, in our previous example, where the
raft is tied to the tree stump in the flowing river and watch-
ing another raft pass him. The observer has the force acting
on him, not the falling capsule, and that force is the Earth's
surface acting on his feet.

The fact is that gravity is like a flowing river of variable
time. An object falling freely in a gravitational field has no
force acting on it. Only when the object is stopped in the field,
as we are on the surface of the Earth, does a force act, and
that is what gives us sore feet if we are standing up for too
long, and a sore rear if we are sitting down for too long.

It should also be noted that Newton himself wisely stated
that his Laws of Gravitation assume that "time" is a constant
throughout the universe. We now know that that is an incor-

rect assumption. His Laws effectively replace "a variable
time field" with a force which gives an adequate explanation,
in most cases.

If we apply Newton's Laws to stationary objects on the
Earth's surface, then an object receiving a force and an ob-
server watching the event, both express similar views as to
what has happened and such events satisfy the theory.

However this is not so for objects falling through gravita-
tional fields. Therefore there must be a more adequate expla-
nation.

Dimensions

Consider the hypothesis that there are various types of di-
mensions such as time, space, feelings, sound etc. and that
these dimensions can be considered separately or in conjunc-
tion with each other. Within these dimensions there are sub-
dimensions. In the dimension of space for example we know
there are sub-dimensions of a straight line, an area and a vol-
ume.

Consider the hypothesis that the physical world such as our
home, our car and even ourselves, exists in the dimensions of
space, and is made from, the dimension of time. That is our
home, our car and even ourselves are made from the
"dimension of time" which I will later explain.

We also have brains that give us the software to allow the ex-
ploration of various areas of the other dimensions from stim-
ulations from the world around us, such as colour through

light, sound and music through the vibration of molecules,
and feelings through sight, sound and touch. But the other
dimensions are another journey.

I will only be considering the dimensions of space and time.

So the observed universe is made up of the various dimen-
sions of space and time. The dimension of space is similar to
an artist's blank canvas, only in three dimensions.

The various dimensions of time, as I will explain, are like the
paint that the artist uses to make the picture. The various di-
mensions of time result in gravity, electricity, magnetism,
light, matter and everything that physically exists in the
space dimensions.

The dimension of space has no time dimension. It only exists
if time exists. It can have infinite length in all directions. It
can exist in a single dimension as a straight line, in two di-
mensions as an area, three dimensions as a volume and
maybe it can fold up into four or more dimensions, all at an
instant or for any length of time depending on the shape and
form of the time dimension.

Chapter 4

The Dimensions of Time

ime is motion. Consider the hypothesis that the dimen-
sions of time manifest themselves in the dimensions of

space as tiny dots at zero time. Because time and motion are
one and the same, these tiny dots are travelling at a very
high speed. These dots of time travel in dimensions either in
a straight line, or curl up into an area, or as a volume by the
area moving, or fold up into further dimensions.

The dimensions of time have no space dimensions and the di-
mensions of space have no time dimensions.

The First Dimension Of Time

The first dimension of time is where the dots (or particles) of
time travel in a straight line. These dots emanate from all
matter and there are billions of them per square centimetre
travelling continuously in all directions in our space. Most of
the dots that pass through us have come from the matter of
the Earth, others from the Sun and planets, and still others

from the matter in the Milky Way Galaxy and from distant
galaxies.

The Earth and the Moon, apart from each other's influence,
are moving in a similar sea of dots resulting from the various
masses in the universe.

The effect of these dots of time from a mass like the Earth is
the creation of a variable time field (and a variable space
field) around the Earth. This is commonly referred to as a
gravitational field, where the intensity of the field is greatest
the closer one is to the mass.

I have called these tiny dots that travel in a straight line,
"gravitons" because they create gravitational fields (this defi-
nition may vary from other definitions for gravitons). They
pass through all matter without a blink and because they are
not oscillating like an electromagnetic wave, but still exist at
zero time, must travel faster than the speed of light. This will
be explained later.

Because an observer on the Earth's surface is not at zero
time, these tiny dots or gravitons, appear and behave to us as
small strings. This is similar to a blurred picture of a fast
moving object. Far out in space where the gravitational field
is very weak, these tiny strings become very long strings. The
very weak time fields far out in space, as a result of gravitons
from all the matter elsewhere in the universe, are the gravi-
tational influences that control the motion of the galaxies.

So where do these dots or gravitons come from?

Gravitons obviously come from all matter. If they come from

all matter then one possibility is that there is some form of
decay going on, and has been for billions of years, for as long
as the universe has existed. If matter is decaying to produce
gravitons then there must be a weakening of the gravita-
tional field.

If the gravitational field is weakening due to graviton emis-
sions then the Moon should be receding from the Earth and
the Earth from the Sun. Galaxies should be receding from
each other due to the gravitational field weakening.

Is there an alternative explanation to matter decaying in or-
der to produce gravitons?

It may be hypothesised that protons and neutrons in the nu-
cleus are sieves that allow the dots of time (gravitons) from
the time dimension into the space dimension. Black holes
take the dots of time in their various forms such as gravitons,
electricity, magnetism, light and matter out of the space di-
mension and back to the time dimension to be recycled again.

This is an important concept because it allows the time di-
mension to be accessed not only via black holes, but by mini
black holes in the form of sieves through nuclear particles.
This concept of accessing the time dimension with mini black
holes is important. Time has no space dimension and this is
useful in the understanding of space travel.

Units In The First Dimensions Of Time

Because the time dimension has no space dimension, then
the velocity of a particle in 'time units' is the change in time

of the particle per second (sec/sec) relative to a standard clock
at the Earth's surface. When space and time dimensions are
jointly considered, which is our everyday experience, then the
velocity of a particle or mass is in the units of metres per sec-
ond (m/sec).

The space dimension has no time dimension and the time di-
mension has only particles that exist at zero time and travel
at a very fast speed (a photon of light to exist at zero time
has the speed of light and a graviton to exist at zero time
has a speed considerably faster than light.). When the space
and time dimensions overlap, as they do in a gravitational
field, then the unit of time varies from zero to infinitely large
depending on the structure of the graviton field. It varies be-
tween being infinitely large, (zero time) as in a black hole or
a graviton, to being very small and passing infinitely quickly,
as it does far out in space where there are far fewer gravi-
tons.

The Second Dimension Of Time

The second dimension of time occurs when these tiny dots
spin and oscillate in an area at high speed (zero time) at sub-
atomic particle size. These tiny areas of 2 dimensional time
manifest themselves as the electric field. Their spin produces
a static 2 dimensional time field and the spin direction deter-
mines what is called its "positive or negative charge". The
units of time being, sec

/sec.

The Third Dimension Of Time

The third dimension of time is when the second dimension of
time moves relative to an observer, in other words it is a
moving circular area of time. This third dimension is a vol-
ume of time and manifests itself as a magnetic field (moving
electric field). Again it has a "positive and negative charge"
depending on spin, and the units of time being sec

/sec.

The Fourth Dimension Of Time

When a dot travels in a straight line it develops the first di-
mension of time. When it spins or oscillates in a plane it de-
velops the second dimension of time. When it spins or oscil-
lates in a plane and travels in a straight line at right angles
to the first plane it has three dimensions of time (photon).
When a dot of time spins or oscillates in one plane and then
spins or oscillates in another plane at right angles to the first
plane, it is moving about a point in three dimensions, and de-
pending on the rate of oscillations or spins, it develops vari-
ous nuclear particles. The higher the vibrations the smaller
the particle.

Higher Dimensions Of Time

When a dot of time travels in three dimensions about a point
as outlined above, it has to oscillate about that point. Fifth
and other dimensions can be created by the motion of this
point.

Chapter 5

Gravitons and Flying

Saucers

ravitons have been defined as dots of time in the first di-

mension that are generated from all matter and travel
through all matter and are difficult to detect. They would ap-
pear to us as small strings because we exist at a finite time
change. When gravitons enter the space dimension they
cause it to exist for a finite time adjacent to their path. Be-
cause there are billions of gravitons travelling in all direc-
tions around us, space exists continuously.

The formation of gravitational fields is generally from heav-
enly bodies that are spherical in shape, like the Earth, and so
the graviton field is radiating from these heavenly bodies.
These radiating gravitons produce "shells of equal time"
around heavenly masses like the Earth. These "shells of
equal time" have been confirmed in the US Navy's experi-
ments when atomic clocks were taken to various altitudes
and their rates of time were compared to that of standard

atomic clocks on Earth.

Gravitons radiate from matter in a stream and interact with
and open up a volume of the space dimension. If we travelled
on a graviton our unit of time would be infinitely long and
the distance travelled would be zero, although the distance
travelled by the graviton to an observer may be thousands of
light years.

A continuous graviton stream causes the space adjacent to its
path to exist open for the period of time of the graviton
stream and causes the space along the graviton path to be re-
duced.

When billions of atoms form a mass such as the Earth and
each atom radiates a stream of gravitons, similar to a stream
of photons developing light rays, then billions of single di-
mensional graviton paths are generated and these interact
with the existing three dimensional space field. This results
in what we call a gravitational field.

These streams of gravitons from a mass are random. They re-
duce the space along their path and develop a radiating time
field.

The reduced space along these randomly radiating graviton
streams produce a varying space field.

The varying time field from the gravitons also allows the
space between the graviton streams to exist continuously.

A single graviton generates a small packet (or particle) of
zero time and zero length. It also opens up a small pocket of

space adjacent to its path. A stream of continuous gravitons
in a straight or curved line (the curved line occurs when a
body like the Earth is rotating), produces a straight or curved
line in the space dimension of zero time and zero length.

When billions of streams of gravitons radiate in a random
manner from the billions of atoms that make up a mass like
the Earth, then overlapping space and time fields develop
which we call a gravitational field.

So a gravitational field is not merely a 4 dimensional space-
time field. It is a single dimension of time influencing the 3
space dimensions in the vicinity of a graviton stream and
then this occurs billions of times in the 3 dimensions of space.

It is interesting that the gravitational field acts in the oppo-
site direction to the motion of the gravitons and is dependent
on the structure of the graviton field and not the direction of
the gravitons themselves.

To say that a gravitational field is a 4 dimensional space time
field infers that the 3 dimensions of space and the dimension
of time are inseparable, that they can't exist without the four
dimensions wrapped up together. This is what Einsteinian
physicists believe. They believe all 4 dimensions, one of time
and three of space are wound around each other in a form of
inseparable 4 dimensional fabric. This is where I disagree.

Gravitational fields are only a specific type of time field. I
will deal with other time fields such as those created by spin-
ning discs, and how they form, in more detail shortly.

This is not to say that General Relativity does not give viable

answers. It is however very complex and has very limited
practical use. It has tied the first dimension of time and the 3
dimensions of space together. It will give a correct solution to
a problem that involves the overlapping of both the space di-
mension and the time dimension, but it is incorrect to be in-
sistent that the space and time dimensions cannot be consid-
ered separately.

General Relativity, it appears, can be considered as an exten-
sion of the analysis of a graviton using Special Relativity for
a single dimensional particle, and then extended over 3 di-
mensions of space. Even if 4 dimensional space-time was de-
termined by the direction of motion of the gravitons, which it
is not, it is still not a justification to cast in stone, as the Ein-
steinian physicists do, that in a gravitational field, space and
time are inseparable. It is no more valid than to state that a
straight line, a single dimension of space, cannot be indepen-
dently analysed and separated from a volume, which is 3 di-
mensional space. It is done every day when a child draws a
line with a ruler.

However it is also interesting that Newtonian Physics gives
viable answers to planetary motion in most cases although it
is based on the incorrect assumptions that time and space are
constant throughout the universe.

Gravitational Fields

To understand the gravitational field it is necessary to have a
theory on how nature develops the gravitational field and
then to check this with the observed facts. It is only a part of
the journey of discovery to rely on observations as has oc-

curred with Kepler and Newton. We have to ask the question
often put by Prof Julius Sumner-Miller "Why is it so?"

Gravitons in this hypothesis are the creators of gravitational
fields and their radiating intensity from a heavenly body cre-
ates a variable time field (and a varying space field) that we
call gravity.

Gravitons acting in three dimensions of space around a heav-
enly body also create a varying space field. This varying
space field is only negligible in gravitational fields as weak as
that of the Earths and need not be considered. More impor-
tantly it is the varying time field that causes motion, not the
varying space field.

Forces On A Flying Saucer And Its Occupants

There is an important point in our discussion so far in rela-
tion to flying saucers and it involves forces. Gravitational
fields are not force fields and no force acts on an unrestrained
mass in a variable time field.

An artificial variable time field generated by a flying saucer
to change its direction will therefore exert no force on the pi-
lot or the craft, so long as they are in the field, as they
change their direction to accommodate the new gravitational
field. This allows high speed manoeuvring with light weight
craft and no "g" forces on the occupants of the flying
saucer.

When a force is used to change the direction of a craft in a
gravitational field, as with a phantom jet or a mig fighter,

then massive "g" forces occur on the pilot and the plane. Al-
though the pilot may have on a gravity suit, he and his craft
are unable to take more than 6 or 8 "gs" and this limits the
manoeuvrability and design of present day jet fighters.

However flying saucers out-manoeuvre fighter planes with
the equivalent of 100 or 200 "gs" and this helps explain the
cover-up by Governments and military authorities in relation
to flying saucers. There is no wonder they have a cover-up.
The flying saucers have a superior technology and the au-
thorities are worried. They out-manoeuvre our best fighter
planes, they have caused pilots to die trying to chase them
and everyone wants to know the technology! Well read on!

Propulsion System Of Flying Saucers

Investigations by experts at the sighting locations of flying
saucers identify no chemical propulsion system such as rocket
fuel or fuel from combustion engines. There are no Geiger
counter readings from nuclear radiation bi-products if fission
of uranium or plutonium were used. However there is often a
small background reading of magnetic radiation.

Often the car headlights fail and engines stop, but this is
more likely a part of the field around the craft, than a cause
of the propulsion system. So the propulsion system must be
related to the intelligence controlling the flying saucers hav-
ing a better understanding of the laws of physics than we do.

The aliens flying the saucers appear not to be subject to the
massive "g" forces our pilots experience. It is therefore a high
probability that they exist in an anti-gravitational field along

with the flying saucer.

The propulsion system is very likely a time field and not a
force field, such as rocket or jet propulsion, that our fighter
pilots use to manoeuvre their craft.

Let us look at different types of time fields.

A Spinning Disc

As a young boy I had a friend whose mother was a checkout
lady for a supermarket. Sweet manufacturers would offer
free tickets on rides at Luna Park in Sydney with purchases
of their lolly bags. His mother would collect bags of tickets
from customers not wanting them. In those days you needed
a ticket for each ride at Luna Park. My friend and I went for
a swim at the Olympic Pool at North Sydney and then spent
the afternoon at Luna Park. What a day! We rode on every
event a dozen times until we had had enough.

At Luna Park there was a large building with a range of fun
things to do called Conney Island. One of the attractions was
a large, smooth disc. We would jump on the disc and it would
begin to spin. Those on the disc, except for the one sitting in
the centre, would be spun off.

In my early days of thinking about this physics, before Luna
Park was closed due to an accident on the Ghost Train, I
went back to Conney Island and watched the children on the
spinning disc.

As the disc began to spin, those sitting on it slid off. But there

were some interesting observations:

1. Whatever it was that made those sitting on the disc
slide off, it had the same effect as a gravitational field.
2. As the children on the smooth disc were sliding off, and
while still on the disc, their clothes were not being pulled,
as would happen if forced. Only when they hit the station-
ary floor was there no uniform motion.
3. The children furthest from the centre of the disc were
the first to begin to slide.
4. The children moved in a direction at right angles to the
motion of the disc.

We know from Special Relativity that the change in time
on a particle is related to the speed of the particle (in fact
it is proportional to the square of the speed of the particle,
as will be seen later).

Newtonian physics says that a force acts on a mass fixed
to a spinning object and this is correct if the object is fixed.
It also states that the acceleration acts radially and is pro-
portional to the velocity squared, and inversely propor-
tional to the radius.

Now if an object is free to move on the surface of a spin-
ning disc, what is happening?

The spinning disc and the people spinning on it create a
variable time field. The particles that make up the people
on the moving disc have created because of their motion, a
varying time field, and this is the same as a gravitational
field. The children are "falling" sideways, in a similar way
to falling in a gravitational field.

The spinning disc can therefore be considered a
"variable time field" or an "artificial gravitational
field". It has concentric circles of time with the intensity of
the time field increasing away from the centre. The time field
and the motion that results from the field on a mass is not re-
lated to any space change and that is why the space and time
dimensions can be separated as previously discussed in gravi-
tational fields.

The spinning disc creates a very interesting time field be-
cause of the way it is formed. The direction of motion of an
unrestrained mass in this field is at right angles to the mo-
tion of the particles that make up the disc. So the direction of
motion of a mass in a variable time field is not determined by
the direction of the particles that make up the time field, but
the direction of the intensity of the time field.

In the Earth's gravitational field the gravitons are
travelling away from the Earth, but a mass falls to-
wards the Earth's centre because that is the direction
of the intensity of the time field. With a rotating disc
an unrestrained mass falls at right angles to the disc's
motion and away from its centre because that is the
direction of the intensity of the time field.

The direction of motion of the gravitons in the case of the
Earth and the direction of motion of the mass on the disc are
irrelevant. The change in the space dimension in both cases
is also irrelevant. What is relevant to the motion of an
unrestrained object is the time field created and its di-
rection of intensity.

If gravitons travelled along the same path, but in the oppo-

site direction towards the centre of the Earth, then the same
gravitational time field would result.

Alternatively, the same density of gravitons could travel in
shells around the Earth and the same gravitational field
would result. (There would be a slight variation in the space
field, but this is negligible).

With a different configuration of gravitons, a time field can
be created where a mass falls away from the centre of the
Earth, as a mass does on a rotating disc, or alternatively it
can freely move in any direction depending on the intensity of
the time field.

So Einstein's Theory Of General Relativity is a mathematical
explanation of the overlapping space and time fields that de-
velop as a result of the configuration of the graviton field in
3 dimensions of space. It may give adequate answers but in
no way is it written in stone that the 4 dimensions of space-
time are inseparable.

Flying Saucers

Now flying saucers act in interesting ways. They can hover
and travel at low speed. They can travel at great speed. They
can manoeuvre freely and perform any type of aerobatics at
great speed. They appear to have no "g forces" acting on
them. They can disappear. They are silent. They defy our
current laws of physics. They appear to be a solid structure
and controlled by some form of intelligence. There appears to
be two general types, the saucer shape, and the type that
looks like a long elongated football known as a "mother

ship". The "saucer shaped" crafts have been seen to fly into
the large "mother ships", which are probably used as cosmic
"aircraft carriers" for storage of craft, accommodation and for
intergalactic flight. How do the "mother ships" travel around
the cosmos? How do the mother ships remain invisible?

Before I tackle the big questions like the design of flying
saucers, how they manoeuvre and disappear, and other re-
lated technologies, it is necessary to first develop the equa-
tions of motion of a mass moving in a gravitational time field,
and to see that these equations satisfy reality. It needs to be
shown how these equations differ to Newtonian physics. This
is important because Newtonian Physics does give accurate
explanations to observed phenomena.

The "time equations" for the gravitational field will be used
to explain the physics of flying saucers and the reasons why
they are so manoeuvrable. I will then develop "time equa-
tions" for the second dimension of time, the electric field, and
then the third dimension of "time equations" for the magnetic
field. Then the gravitational, electric and magnetic fields can
be unified.

It will also be seen that flying saucers and their "mother
ships" use "the physics of time" in the first dimension to
manoeuvre in gravitational fields, and the advanced third di-
mensional time physics for inter-galactic travel, and to also
disappear from sight in an instant.

Einsteinian Physics

Einstein has developed his General Theory Of Relativity from

5 2

a mathematical base, using 4 dimensional space-time. He
does not appear to indicate the physical reasons for his as-
sumptions. He has chosen not to outline the natural causes
for his assumption that space and time are inseparable and
that gravity is an intertwined 4 dimensional field. It is how-
ever commonly accepted by Einsteinian physicists that space
and time are inseparable.

Gravitons emanating from all matter may have been as-
sumed by Einstein or he may have developed his theory from
observation.

In his book "Einstein's Universe", Nigel Calder states
"....one can describe gravity and the deformation of space-
time in terms of mutually-interacting gravitons, and arrive at
the same answers as Einstein's."

So using the assumption of gravitons does produce similar re-
sults to Einstein. Calder further states;

"....gravity waves are said to consist of gravitons ..... gravitons

themselves possess energy and are therefore heavy, so they
themselves are vulnerable to the action of other gravi-
tons...... they are therefore deflected along curved tracks.

This incest among the gravitons produces the curvature of
space."

A question we have to ask is whether we are considering the
same particle we call a graviton? It does not really matter.
The graviton field which produces a gravitational field
around a mass is a large number of particles travelling at
zero time and radiating from the mass.

The real question is whether the space and time fields can be
separated. This has been previously answered because the
time field developed around a spinning disc is at right angles
to the direction of motion and the same gravitational field
would develop around the Earth if the gravitons were travel-
ling towards the Earth and not away from it.

There are two problems with current laws of physics which
can cause confusion. The first is that they mix up different di-
mensions. For example the velocity of a particle is metres/sec,
when it could be expressed as the change in a sec/sec. This is
a simple example but it keeps all the units in time dimen-
sions.

The second problem is that laws of motion are based on the
observer's view of what is happening, whereas it should come
from that experienced by the object itself. Often the ob-
server is not aware of the existence of time fields be-
tween himself and the object. This leads to comments
like "the force of gravity", "the centrifugal force", "the
nuclear force", "the electric and magnetic forces". If the
object and not the observer is considered when developing
laws of motion then such statements are inaccurate because
these "forces" are time fields and not forces. This is important
especially in the design of craft that have to function in these
fields.

Chapter 6

T h e P h y s i c s o f T i m e

Gravitational, Electric & Magnetic Fields

GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS

onsider the hypothesis that the Earth's gravitational field
can be approximated to a variable time field and that the

overlapping variable space field has minimal effect on the di-
rection of motion of a mass in orbit in such a field.

Changing Space

Space is similar to the painter's canvas only in 3 dimensions.
It is only present for an instant. It stays continuous when the
dimension of time is present.

The graviton exits at zero time and this can be alternatively
stated that it has an infinite unit of time. The space dimen-
sion along a graviton's path, whilst it is at any location, is
zero in length. In other words if we were a graviton
travelling from a distant galaxy we could reach any point in

the universe according to our view of the world at zero time
and the distance travelled would be zero. (The observer on
Earth looking at a photon of light which is travelling at zero
time will not conclude the light has taken zero time, but
rather light years. This is the important difference between
being an observer and the object; it depends on the relative
time of each, as to what is happening).

The distance between two points, say the centres of Earth
and Pluto, is dependent on the number of gravitons in the
space between the two points. All mass is giving out gravi-
tons. The Sun and Earth are radiating billions of gravitons
every square centimetre.

The variation in space around heavenly bodies due to the
density of gravitons creates a "space field".

The "space field" variation around planets like the Earth,
due to the graviton field of the Earth, is negligible. In Newto-
nian Physics it is considered a constant. In other words a
metre on the surface of the Earth is approximately the same
as a metre 5 kilometres in space.

A "space field" needs to be only considered in very strong
gravitational fields, for example around black holes or when
determining the apparent change in the position of a star
when light from the star is passing the Sun during an eclipse.
In the latter case both the space and time fields, resulting
from the gravitons (and other particles) from the Sun, affect-
ing the photons of light from the star, have to be considered
because the motion is a linear line through variable fields of
both time and space and measured to a fine accuracy.

Changing Time

Velocity is normally measured as metres per second, or kilo-
metres per hour, as on the speedometer of a car. However it
can also be measured as the change in the rate of time, or the
difference it takes time to pass on a clock of a moving object
to that compared to a stationary observer's clock. The clocks
have to be atomic clocks because the change is very small.

So we can measure velocity by considering both space and
time dimensions together, as we do on the speedo of a car, or
we can measure velocity by considering the change in the
rate of time to a 'standard clock' stationary at the surface of
the Earth. This standard clock will run at 1 sec per sec. The
change in the readings on the clocks will be small, in the or-
der of billionths of a second per second for low velocities, and
rise to 1 second per second (the clock on the moving object
will not have changed) at the speed of light.

Let us assume that when a mass travels with a constant ve-
locity "v" in a constant time field, say at the surface of the
Earth, its time change (dt) is proportional to its velocity
squared.

dt = k.v

2 ------------

(1)

where k is a constant

for small values of v.

Now dt is nothing magical. It is the difference in the
reading between two atomic clocks if they were both
synchronised with a stationary observer and then one was

taken at a speed "v" in say a motor car, or an aeroplane or
spaceshuttle. The time change is in fractions of a second / sec-
ond i.e. the fraction of a second change from the initial stan-
dard stationary clock for each second that passes. When the
object reaches the speed of light it will have the time change
of 1 second / second (it will have a reading of zero while the
standard clock will read 1 second.)

Another interesting feature with this "physics of time"
is that it is not the physics of the observer as in New-
tonian and Einsteinian Physics, but rather the physics
of that experienced by the moving object.

In order to simplify equation (1) above,

let

dt = τ

where "τ" is measured in the fraction of a second per second
change from the initial atomic clock reading of 1 second / sec-
ond at the Earth's surface.

The time change "τ" becomes;

τ = k.v

sec / sec ---------- (2)

This is an aside for the mathematicians who have read the
earlier joke about approximations. Initially we will consider
the velocity "v" above for small values of "v" compared to the
speed of light

"c",

velocities between zero and as fast as an or-

biting space shuttle. An example of "v" could be the velocity
of the young engineer in our earlier joke in a sports car with
the mathematician's daughter. It is not near the speed of
light. That comes later.

It is interesting that k = 1 / (2 c

) for very small values of "v"

relative to the speed of light "c", and this satisfies Special
Relativity and Newtonian Physics. Whereas at values of "v"
near the speed of light, k = 1 / (c

) when v = c and t = l sec/

sec.

Also when a mass "m" increases its velocity "v", the en-
ergy change "E" is

E =

m v

for small values of "v".

For "v" approaching the velocity of light "c",

E = m v

as it does in

E = m c

Time Intensity

Time Intensity (T) of a time field, or an unrestrained mass in
a time field, is the rate of change of time of the field or mass.

From (2) above

τ = k.v

dτ / dt = (dτ / dv). ( dv / dt)

T = 2 k v a ----------(3)

where 'a' is the relative acceleration.

In Newtonian Physics

F = mv

/ r for orbital motion

In "The Physics Of Time"

= k v

for the same motion.

In Newtonian Physics when the velocity is differenti-
ated with respect to time it gives acceleration. How-
ever in the "Physics of Time" the differential is the
time intensity (T) and it becomes

T = dτ/dt = 2 k v a

This is an important equation. The lack of understanding of
the intensity of a gravitational field and the intensity re-
quired by a rocket to overcome the gravitational intensity
was and still is, as we shall see, the reason for failures of
rockets in the space industry costing billions of dollars.

Gravitational Time Fields

Let it also be hypothesised that the Earth's gravitational
field is a variable time field where the change in time of the
field (

)

is proportional to the mass (M) of the Earth and in-

versely proportional to the distance (r) from its centre.

then

τ = kGM/r ...................... (4)

where k = constant as

approaches zero

G = gravitational constant

G is a constant and is related to the rate of gravitons being
emitted from the mass M. In other words there is a relation-
ship where the number of gravitons being emitted from a
mass is proportional to the atomic mass of the atoms of that
mass, or to be even more specific, it is proportional to the
number of neutrons and protons in an atom. It could be con-
cluded that protons and neutrons, which are basically the
same in weight, except a proton is slightly lighter due to the
missing mass of an electron, are the source of continuous, but
random streams of gravitons.

So on the surface of the Earth we are living in a sea of gravi-
tons emanating from the matter that makes up the mass of
the Earth. This sea of particles travel through all matter and
produce the variable gravitational time field.

Now let us consider orbital motion.

Orbital Motion

Consider a mass (m), such as a satellite, space shuttle or the
Moon, in a circular orbit around the Earth (M). Newtonian
physics says that there are two equal and opposite forces act-
ing on the mass.

F = G m M / ( r

)

F = m.v

The Physics of Time as espoused by this book states that
there are no forces acting on the mass, only the time change
due to the velocity of the mass and the time change due to
the gravitational time field of the Earth.

t = k G M / r

τ =

Time is directional, and the mass (m), in the above case, the
Moon, changes direction by the persuasion of the direction of
the two time fields acting on the particles that make up its
mass.

In equations of motion in Newtonian Physics for orbiting ob-
jects, the mass of the orbiting object (m) is on both sides of
the equation. It need not be there, it is added and then taken
away.

In a time field it doesn't matter about the mass of the object.
All masses fall (and orbit) at the same rate. Remember
Galileo, he proved this when he apparently dropped different
weights off the Leaning Tower of Pisa and showed that all
masses fall at the same rate in a gravitational field.

Newtonian physics has also added a force (F) when consider-
ing objects orbiting in a gravitational field. Newtonian
Physics uses this approach because it has assumed there is a
force due to gravity and a centrifugal force due to the circular
orbit of the mass. There is no force on an unrestrained mass
in either gravitational or centrifugal fields.

In Newtonian Physics forces have to be used in gravitational
fields because Newton assumed there was no time change in
these fields or elsewhere in the universe.

In fact a satellite orbits in a time field created by the gravi-
tons because the effect of the two time changes on an orbiting
mass, one being due to the Earth's gravitational time field
and that due to its motion, cause it by persuasion to develop
a circular or elliptical orbit. Forces are not present and the
mass of the orbiting object is not relevant.

The astronaut can identify he is in orbit around the Earth if
his atomic clock reads a constant rate of time relative to one
on the surface of the Earth. If he is falling in the Earth's
gravitational field or any other gravitational field, his atomic
clock would show a varying time change to the standard clock
on the Earth's surface.

Time Intensity

Time Intensity (T) is the rate of change of a variable time
field, such as a gravitational time field.

T = dτ/dt ---------

(5)

This differential is similar to the rate of change of velocity to give
acceleration, but no force and no space dimension are involved. If
a mass is falling through a variable time field, like the Earth's
gravitational field, and assuming there is no atmosphere, other-
wise there is friction with the air, it experiences no forces acting
on it.

So in a gravitational time field, the time intensity of the field (T)

is;

T = dτ/dt

= ( dτ / dr). (dr / dt)
= -kGM/(r

). (dr/dt)

(for the mathematicians, dr/dt has a non-trivial solution, but
when dr/r approaches zero, then dr/dt approaches g

, where g

a velocity term equal in magnitude to the value of the gravita-
tional acceleration at radius r, for a particle falling from rest in a
time of 1 second)

dr / dt = g

(m / sec, a velocity term, when dr/r approaches zero)

and

g = G M / ( r

)

and therefore T = - k g.g

(with one of the "g"s a velocity term)

The time intensity (T) for a mass falling in a gravitational field

T = dτ/dt

= (dτ/dr). (dr/dt)

dτ/dr is the change in the time with respect to the radius and this

is k.g (sec/sec/m). dr/dt is the change in the radius with re-
spect to time and this is "g

" m/sec, for small values of dr/r,

and it is a velocity term (m / sec).

T = k.g.g

sec/sec/sec

So the time intensity of a mass falling in a gravitational field
from rest is the same as the time intensity of the gravita-
tional field.

Orbital Motion And Time Intensity

The time intensity of a mass in orbit due to its velocity
around a planet balances, and is opposite to, the time inten-
sity of the gravitational field being experienced by the orbit-
ing body.

A body that comes under the influence of a gravitational
field, like the Earth's, creates a time intensity equal to and
opposite to the intensity of the gravitational field because of
the changed direction of the motion of the body.

However the orbiting body feels no force. It has experienced a
time change due to the time field of the planet which has per-
suasively altered its straight line path to a curved path, and
this is balanced by the time change created by its velocity.

The only change, besides the time change due to the gravita-
tional field, has been the persuasion of the intensity of the
gravitational field to change the direction of motion of the or-
biting mass to a curved or elliptical path to make the time in-
tensities balance. If the gravitational field was removed, the

orbiting body would move at a tangent to its circular or ellip-

tical path.

Time intensity is not a force, it is an indication of the rate of

change of a time field.

A mass develops its own time intensity to overcome the in-
tensity of a gravitational field by changing its velocity and di-
rection of motion. So an object falling vertically or as a trajec-
tory with a curved path, increases its velocity to correspond
with the time intensity (the rate of change of time in the
field) of the gravitational time field it is falling in. This is
achieved by the object increasing its velocity to correspond to
the required time change in the gravitational field.

Using time field equations to describe orbital motion gives
the same results in most cases (we will examine several ex-
ceptions later) as Newtonian physics. However they assume
no forces acting on the orbiting object and the equations sat-
isfy both the observer on the ground (who must realise that
there is a varying time field between himself and the object)
and the object in orbit as to what they see and feel respec-
tively.

This concept of no forces is critical for our later discussion on
the physics of a flying saucer.

In the "Physics Of Time" the equations of motion for masses
in gravitational fields take the physics to a higher level than
Newtonian Physics. In Newtonian Physics for orbital motion
the force of gravity F = mg is balanced by the centrifugal
force F = mv

/r. In the "Physics of Time" these two forces no

longer exist and the mass of the body is irrelevant. Newto-

nian Physics does not go any further, but the "Physics of
Time" allows the Time Intensity in the radial direction
to be considered and this highlights the difference be-
tween the two theories.

Time Strength

Time Strength (S) of a body is equal to the mass (m) of the
body multiplied by the time intensity (T).

S = mT

— -------------- (6)

The time intensity (T) of a mass is a function of its accelera-
tion times its velocity.

The airfoil of an aeroplane wing can be analysed using the
time change on the air particles due to their relative in-
creased velocity over the top of the wing to that on the under-
side. It is no coincidence that Bernoulli's Equation involves a
velocity squared term and his equation can therefore be ex-
pressed in "time units".

The stalling of an aircraft (the aircraft falling backwards
when it comes out of a dive at slow speed) is because it is be-
low the 'time intensity' (the critical acceleration times veloc-
ity) required to overcome the time intensity of the gravita-
tional field. It requires both velocity and acceleration to over-
come the time intensity of a gravitational field and if there is
no acceleration term then the aircraft will fall like a stone.

To overcome the gravitational field when launching a rocket
requires both an acceleration and a velocity (momentum).

Rockets stall if on lift-off they are given an acceleration re-
sulting in a very low velocity. Early failures in rocketry by
the US and recently by the Chinese with their Long March
Missiles resulted from this oversight. Engineers have come to
realise (by practical testing rather than understanding the
physics of gravity) that rockets need both a thrust
(momentum) and an acceleration at lift off. Rockets are now
held down for a number of seconds after ignition with huge
clamps until a momentum has developed. When the clamps
are released the rocket has a built up momentum which gives
it a velocity to overcome stalling.

Newtonian physics suggests that a force greater than

F = mg should result in a vertical motion of the rocket. But

this is not so.

This is an example where the "Physics of Time" differs
from "Newtonian Physics".

Satellites at the end of their life begin to fall out of their or-
bits. As they do, they re-enter the Earth's atmosphere and
decelerate creating a time intensity. They then shoot across
the orbit at a tangent. The same occurs with shooting stars
as they enter the Earth's atmosphere.

The satellite as it fails, and the shooting star create a time
intensity due to friction with the atmosphere and are able to
overcome the intensity of the gravitational field and travel in
a near straight line rather than a "Newtonian predicted"
curved trajectory. This results in scientists and engineers
rarely knowing the location where space junk will hit the
Earth.

Trajectory Of A Rotating Mass During Flight

Consider the motion of a rotating ball during flight, such as a
baseball, a cricket ball or even a golf ball.

Current theories have it that a ball spinning about its own
axis and in flight, has a force due to gravity and a force due
to the change in pressure of the air due to the motion of the
ball ( Bernoulli's Law). But is the change in motion of the ball
due to the varying pressure of the air around the ball, or is
the motion the consequence of the changing time field caused
by the varying velocity of the air particles? What about the
motion of spinning objects that move in a vacuum, like the
motion of galaxies and planets. Is there another explanation?

The motion of a cricket ball that is bowled with a spin can be
considered in Time Physics. It has 3 time fields acting on it.
It has the time field of the Earth's gravitational time field, it
has the time field of its forward motion relative to the air and
it has the time field created by the particles of air adjacent to
the ball relative to the motion of the ball. This last factor is
the reason why bowlers in cricket smooth one side of a cricket
ball and have the other side "rough".

The ball moves as a result of the persuasion of these time
fields. If it is prevented from curving, as the wing of a plane
is prevented from moving vertically because of the weight of
the plane, then varying air pressures and forces result.

The direction of motion of the ball is determined by the direc-
tion of the intensity of the various time fields and their mag-
nitudes. The varying pressure of the air particles around the
ball is a result of the time field created by the air particles.

The apparent non-Newtonian motion and weight loss on the
gyroscopes of Prof Laithwaite and Sandy Kidd and the com-
plex motion of gyroscopes generally may be better explained
with "time physics".

I spent many years building and developing gyroscopes.
Some machines stood 2 metres tall and were controlled by
complex electronics in order to achieve a particular time in-
tensity in their motion. I began with the simple concept that
time change on a mass was the only influence on the motion
of an object in a time field. By creating the appropriate time
change and/or time intensity on a rotating ring, for example,
it could levitate in a gravitational field. This concept was not
complete and it required a further development that time is
also directional.

The particles of a gyroscope, for example, are influenced by
their time change and by the direction of the time intensity of
each time field acting on them. The time field of a rotating
object on its own will not result in a weight loss, unless that
weight loss is the result of a time field that has a direction of
intensity opposite to that of the gravitational field.

Anti-gravity propulsion systems in flying saucers are not de-
termined by rotating masses and gyroscopic motion.

However if gravity is a time field and not a force field then
this raises some interesting questions.

Newton's First Law

Newton's first law states, "A body will remain station-

ary or travel with a constant velocity in a straight
line, unless acted on by an external force."

Consider the motion of a body travelling with a constant ve-
locity on a frictionless surface at the Earth's surface. It will
travel in a straight line according to Newton's first law.

If the frictionless surface were to extend around the entire
Earth, then the body could travel in a curved path indefi-
nitely. This appears to contradict Newton's first law because
the path is curved and no external force is acting to change
the motion.

This law should read" A body will remain stationary or
travel with a constant velocity in a straight or constant
curved path, unless it changes its unit of time."

This covers a body acted on by a force, a body in orbital mo-
tion, and a body travelling around the Earth at a constant
velocity on a frictionless surface at sea level.

Black Holes

When a gravitational time field begins to rotate in a circle
similar to a 2 dimensional time field, it is hypothesised that it
creates a 4 dimensional space time black hole. These black
holes have also been hypothesised to be wormholes out of the
space dimension into other universes and/or dimensions.

Small circular time fields found in electric and magnetic
fields could also be conduits to other dimensions on a nuclear
level. Are our brains wired via receptors to other dimensions

like emotion, colour and sound through tiny black holes?

ELECTRIC FIELDS

Electric Fields are hypothesised as 2 dimensional time fields
created by dots of time spinning or oscillating in a plane.
Electric fields are also not force fields, they are time fields, al-
though they are different dimensional time fields to gravita-
tional fields.

The Electric Field around a point charge q can be defined as
follows;

= k

q / r

where τ

is the time change, r is the distance from q, k

the electric constant and the of units τ

are;

sec

/ sec

Time Intensity

The time intensity of an electric field is the rate of change of
the electric field.

T = dτ/ dt

= (dτ / dr). (dr / dt)

= (-k

q/ r

) . ( E*)

= - k

. E . E*

- where E is the field intensity
- and E* is a velocity term equal to the magnitude of E for
dr approaching zero

Alternatively

T = dτ / dt

= (

d τ /

d q ) . ( d q / d t )

= - ( k / r ) . i

k, r are constants, i is current.

MAGNETIC FIELDS

Magnetic fields are 3 dimensional time fields. They are
formed when an electric field, dots of time spinning or
oscillating in a plane, move relative to a stationary
observer. There are no forces acting on a magnetic mass
moving in a magnetic field. The time change on a particle
is always proportional to the velocity squared.

= k

.qv

is the magnetic time change

is the magnetic constant

The units of time change in the magnetic field are;

sec

/ sec

Time Intensity

The time intensity in the magnetic field is the rate of change
of the magnetic time field.

= dτ/dt

= (

dτ /

dv) . ( dv / dt)

= ( k

. 2. q . v / r ) . a

The units of time intensity in the magnetic field are;

(sec

/ sec / sec)

The time intensity in the magnetic field can be increased by

1) increasing the field q.v or
2) surging the existing field by "a"

(dv / dt = a)

In the "Physics Of Time", the unit of time in the magnetic
field is sec

/sec. This is similar to the change in volume/sec or

cubic m/sec in space and time units of measurements.

In "The Physics Of Time" the unit of time intensity in the
magnetic field (sec

/sec/sec) is like the rate of change in the

volume of water passing a point, i.e. (volume) / sec / sec in
space and time units of measurement. The unit of time in the
magnetic field and the unit of time intensity are also direc-
tional, in a similar way to time fields in the first dimension of
time.

Flying saucers and their mother ships appear to use gravi-

tons and the 'first dimension of time' for visible travel within
gravitational fields around planets and then use the principle
of developing a shell of intense, surging magnetic time field
around their craft so that they can disappear and travel to
other space and time co-ordinates at the speed of light. This
will be further discussed later.

Time intensity in the magnetic field is also the physics used
in the Philadelphia Experiment. The ship's hull had an in-
tense, surging magnetic time field applied through and
around it to develop an intense shell with a zero time field
and the ship then disappeared. This experiment by the US
Navy will also be discussed in more detail later.

Chapter 7

A Unified Field Theory

nifying the gravitational, electric and magnetic fields in
the dimensions of time is similar to the unification of the

three dimensions of space.

The three dimensions of space are a straight line, an area
and a volume. Consider the situation where each of these
three dimensions was in completely different units.

Supposing a straight line was measured in feet, an area was
measured in square millimetres and a volume in cubic yards.

To unify the three dimensions of space when different units
are used, initially requires an equation that determines the
relationship between the dimensions.

length . area = volume --------- (a)

Now each dimension needs to be expressed in similar units
by using different constants.

Supposing we choose the length 'L' to be metres as the com-
mon unit.

Then substituting in (a) above

( k

. L ) . ( k

. L

) = k

------------ (b)

then if we choose L = 1,2,3.....n metres, where n is any

number of metres, then substituting in (b) above

. k

= k

The gravitational, electric and magnetic fields have been hy-
pothesised as time fields. They develop as a result of the
fields formed when dots of zero time travel in straight lines,
oscillate in an area, or move in three dimensions of space, at
high speed at zero time.

So the time fields of gravity, electricity and magnetism are
similar to the three dimensions of space (length, area and vol-
ume), except they are formed from these tiny dots of time
travelling at high speed in a straight line, an area and a vol-
ume.

Due to the separate development of the gravitational, electric
and magnetic fields in physics, the units in these 3 dimen-
sions of time are different.

For unification in the various fields we have;

(gravitational time field) times (electric time field)

= magnetic time field

Is this so in reality ? The actual values which can be verified
in most physics text books are;

Substituting these values in (c) above confirms the unifica-
tion of the constants with known values, and the unification
of the gravitational, electric and magnetic fields.

Further the above constants can also be expressed in a
slightly different format found in most physics text books,

where c is the velocity of light

is the electrostatic permittivity constant

is the magnetic permeability constant,

This equation further reinforces the relationship between the
constants in the three time dimensions of gravity, electricity
and magnetism.

The first dimension of time can be produced with gravitons
and this results in the gravitational field. The gravitons af-
fect the space dimension, by reducing the length of space
along their path and also allowing space to open up adjacent
to their path. Because gravitons emanate from heavenly bod-
ies they radiate and allow the 3 dimensions of space to re-
main open.

The effect of a single stream of gravitons radiating from a
heavenly mass such as the Earth results in a single dimen-
sion of zero time. This stream allows a small volume of space
to open up around the stream. Space having no time dimen-
sion and time having no space dimension.

If then billions of these streams of gravitons occur and radi-
ate from a heavenly mass like the Earth, then a variable
space field and an overlapping variable time field result,
each with its own dimensions.

The dimensions of space are affected by gravitons. Existing
space changes its dimensions when a new mass is introduced
depending on the new direction and density of the gravitons
from the introduced mass.

However in weak gravitational fields the changes in the
length, area and volume of space is minimal and only compli-
cates both the understanding of gravitational fields and ar-
riving at practical answers because of the complex 4 dimen-
sional mathematics. This is the reason Newtonian rather
than Einsteinian physics is still used by engineers and physi-
cists to determine the orbits of spacecraft. Newtonian physics
assumes space is a constant and for simple orbital physics
the assumption that gravity, and centrifugal affects are

forces, and that they cancel each other out, results in the cor-
rect answer.

However the assumptions in Newtonian physics that time
and space are a constant throughout the universe, lead to a
narrow understanding of the nature of gravity and place limi-
tations on the design of craft that can fly in gravitational
fields.

The "Physics Of Time" allows the space and time dimensions
to be separated and for simple solutions to problems to be ob-
tained, that otherwise require using complex mathematics of
4,5 and 6 dimensions. It also allows a visualisation of the
physics involved.

The shortfall within Newtonian Physics that time is a con-
stant throughout the universe and that gravity is a force, re-
sults in the inaccurate assumption that heavenly bodies are
held in place by forces, such as gravitational, centrifugal and
centripetal forces, and hides the fact that both velocity and
acceleration are involved for a mass to overcome the intensity
of a field. This can be a costly oversight for aerospace compa-
nies.

The misunderstanding in gravitational fields regarding forces
also occurs in other time fields, such as electric and magnetic
fields.

It is common throughout current physics thinking to consider
the bonds between atoms and atomic particles as forces, for
example, the electrostatic force, the nuclear force, the gravi-
tational force, the magnetic force. These are not forces, they
are dimensional time fields. They are no more a force, than

the "gravitational force" of the Earth on the Moon is not a
force. As soon as they are considered forces then the real
physics of what is happening slips through our fingers.

An understanding of the actual and not observed physics in
all time fields is required to determine the real forces on a
craft and its occupants in time fields. This is vital if we wish
to appreciate the "physics of a flying saucer".

Speed Of A Graviton

The limit to the speed of a particle is when the particle devel-
ops a velocity where its unit of time is infinite. It then exists
in zero time. An alternative view is that it has developed a
speed to change its rate of time by 1 sec per sec compared to
our standard clock.

Consider the hypothesis already discussed that nature has
made a dot, or particle, that travels at a very fast speed and
it exists at zero time. This particle when it radiates from
matter is the basis of the gravitational field. When the dot of
time spins and oscillates in a circle it is the basis of the elec-
tric field. And when the electric field moves, it is the basis of
the magnetic field.

If the electromagnetic field is made up of dots of zero time
that rotate and oscillate in one plane and travel at a maxi-
mum speed of light "c" in the third dimension of space, then it
is probable that the dots of time have a zero time change in
the other two dimensions because there are accelerations and
decelerations involved.

It can therefore be concluded that the velocity of a graviton,
which has been defined in this book as a dot of time in one di-
mension of space where there is no motion in the other two
dimensions of space, is the cube of the speed of light squared.

The time that passes as a result of the speed of the funda-
mental particle of nature that makes up all fields and matter,
is zero time. It has only one speed, that which gives it a zero
time. The electromagnetic wave travels with this dot oscillat-
ing in two dimensions and travelling at the speed of light "c"
in the third dimension. The electric field has little or no rela-
tive motion, the dot rotates and oscillates about an axis.

The graviton, if it is made from this fundamental particle ex-
isting at zero time and with no oscillations in other space di-
mensions, must have a speed of the cube of light squared.

R = c

where R is the speed of a graviton
c is the speed of light

This is an important concept because it demonstrates that
gravitons travel at high speed so they can pass straight
through all matter. They emanate from matter itself and
there are billions per square centimetre in the space dimen-
sion. It probably also explains why gravity waves are so diffi-
cult to detect.

Gravitons also have an important communication function
for flying saucers. The intergalactic form of communications
is probably not electromagnetic radiation, such as light
waves, radio waves or microwaves. Signals made from these

waves would be interfered with, bent and eliminated by the
matter in the cosmos and it would be doubtful if they sur-
vived the vast distances of space.

Gravitons could be used for intergalactic communications be-
cause they travel through all matter, they probably travel at
the cube of the speed of light squared, and in straighter lines
than electromagnetic waves, and they would only be inter-
fered with in exceptional circumstances.

Other Dimensions Of Time

It is hypothesised that the dots of time that make up gravita-
tional fields, electric fields and magnetic fields, can also oscil-
late in three dimensions about a point and create atomic par-
ticles. Maybe they can fold up into 4 and greater dimensions
of time to create more exotic particles.

Does the space dimension also follow the time dimension and
fold up into similar dimensions? Current theoretical physics
considers there is 1 time dimension and the rest of the dimen-
sions, maybe 10, 20 or more, are space dimensions. The
"Physics Of Time" hypothesises that there are 3 dimensions
of space and that there are a number of dimensions of time, 3
of which are discussed in detail in this book. The dimensions
of time reduce the space dimensions to zero as the dots of
time move in those space dimensions. The space dimension
therefore does not appear relevant in the study of atomic par-
ticles.

It can therefore be hypothesised that these "dots of time" in
their various dimensions such as gravitational fields, electric

fields, magnetic fields, atomic particles and mass are all
forms of time, except with different dimensions and having
different formats in the various dimensions of space.

Gravitons. Where Do They Come From?

Consider the formula for the time field in a gravitational field
caused by a mass M at distance r from the mass.

= kM/r

T = dτ/dt

= (dτ / dM) . (dM / dt)

= (k / r). (dM / dt) ......................... (a)

But we know from E = M C

dM/dE = constant

and dM/dt = (dM / dE ). (dE / dt)

= const. dE/dt

therefore T = constant. (dE/dt)/r

therefore T, the intensity of the gravitational field at a dis-
tance r from a mass M, is proportional to the decay of the
mass M.

If this is the case the gravitational field intensity should have

been weakening over time due to the decay of matter from
graviton emissions. If this is so then it could be a contribut-
ing factor to explain one of the reasons why the universe is
expanding. Such a conclusion could be determined by the
changes in the radius of the Moon's orbit around the Earth.

Other reasons for the expansion of the universe could be the
reduction in the mass of stars as they radiate energy and
loose mass and gravitational attraction, or it could be a
change in the value of the Gravitational Constant G over
time.

However if matter is not decaying, although graviton emis-
sion is taking place to form the gravitational field, then gravi-
tons must be coming from somewhere.

The renewal of gravitons could be the result of neutrons and
protons being minute wormhole/valves in space-time and
acting like sieves from the time dimension, to allow streams
of gravitons from the time dimension into the space dimen-
sion. This explains another reason for the existence of pro-
tons and neutrons in nature (a proton is a neutron without
an electron).

Matter is swallowed into large black holes to the time dimen-
sion and comes back into the space dimension through neu-
trons and protons. Gravitons come from somewhere, they
may come from the decay of matter, or from matter being the
sieve to allow these gravitons back into the space dimension.

In the time dimension gravitons and photons experience no
space dimension and time has an infinite unit. A photon of
light may travel billions of kilometres and take a billion light

Chapter 8

The Physics Of A

Flying

saucer

There are over 200 billion billion stars in the observed uni-
verse and it still appears to have no end. More powerful tele-
scopes only expand our vision of the number of stars in the
cosmos. For humans on Earth to believe that they are the
only intelligence in the universe is naive. It is equivalent to
those in Galileo's day believing the Earth was the centre of
the universe.

It is not a case of waiting and doing nothing until someone
proves that there are other intelligences in the universe, the
odds are too great in favour that there is other life. It is up to
us to assume that there are other forms of intelligence, that
some are more advanced than we are, and that they may be
visiting us with technology beyond our comprehension. It is
up to those who are inquisitive to find out what they are do-
ing. Are these aliens visiting us for purely scientific interest,
or are they in control? What influence have they had in the
past and what influence are they having on our lives now!

The physics I have explained can be developed into advanced
engineering and technologies that can demonstrate that
other intelligences have been visiting us for thousands of
years. This advanced physics gives them the means to reach
us. They may be amongst us. It may be they are just observ-
ing and taking research data and only influencing our devel-
opment if we head for destruction. Or is it possible, unbe-
known to us that we are under their control. I believe it is the
latter.

Space Travel

How could aliens from other planets travel such vast dis-
tances to reach us ?

The common debunking of flying saucers and aliens is that
the distances of space are too great for other intelligences to
be able to reach us. The argument goes that the nearest star
outside our solar system is

Alpha Centauri

which is 4 light

years away, and other galaxies are up to hundreds and even
billions of light years from us. Even if aliens could travel at
one hundredth the speed of light, which is far faster than we
currently travel, it would take 400 years one way from the
nearest star

Alpha Centauri

to reach us. This is considering

the motion of the craft from the observer's view and leads to
an incorrect conclusion, as we have discussed earlier.

It is easier and quicker to travel from a distant star thou-
sands of light years away from Earth, than it is for us to
travel to a different continent on our own planet.

Before we consider the physics in this book and the spacecraft

that can result from it, let us determine the time it takes a
craft travelling at the speed of light to reach Earth from a
planet in a solar system with a star similar to

Alpha Cen-

tauri,

say, four light years from our solar system.

Consider the spacecraft conventionally powered and capable
of accelerating to the speed of light 'c'.

When the spacecraft accelerates to a velocity v = .886 the
speed of light (c), although the craft may not have even left
its own solar system, the distance to Earth is only 2 light
years away. When the craft reached a velocity of .99 c, again
it can still be in its own solar system, the craft is only .4 light
years from Earth and when it reaches a velocity of .9999 c
the craft is only 20 light days from Earth. If the craft can
travel at higher speeds the distance is compressed further. It
could take only a few days with these accelerations and veloc-
ities to travel from a galaxy 2 billion light years from Earth.
It depends on the rate of acceleration, deceleration, maxi-
mum velocity and the engineering of the craft.

In the "Physics Of Time", however, it is possible to instanta-
neously develop a zero time field around the spacecraft and
reappear anywhere in the universe in zero time. If this ap-
pears impossible, consider a photon of light.

Light from a distant galaxy, say 10 billion light years from
Earth takes zero time, in the time of the photon, to reach us.
The distance from this galaxy to Earth as perceived and ex-
perienced by the photon of light is zero, and it reaches us in
zero time. So, has the light actually travelled the 10 billion
light years to Earth? Maybe it has an initial direction and
subject to no interference from other time dimensions, for ex-

ample matter, it can pop out at the appropriate time and
space co-ordinates with distance not being a factor and other
time fields, such as matter, the only requirement to be
avoided.

Others will argue that when a mass reaches a velocity 'c' its
mass becomes infinite. However this may be so if we are deal-
ing with a mass and its velocity is increased, but the dimen-
sions of time can be used in different forms. We can develop a
shell of zero time around our spacecraft so that the shell is in
3 dimensions of zero time and this allows our craft and its
contents to pop put anywhere in four dimensional space-time
in zero time. Remember time intensity in the magnetic field
can allow the development of a shell of zero time around our
spacecraft.

This is the basis of the physics of the "mother ships" that
carry the flying saucers around the universe. They are like
aircraft carriers with flying saucers inside. The mother ships
use time intensity in the magnetic field to develop a zero time
shield around the ship. This allows them to travel vast dis-
tances in zero time.

How Do Flying Saucers Work?

Flying saucers have been observed by reliable witnesses for
thousands of years. They come in two general shapes, the
scout vehicles which are saucer shaped and the 'mother vehi-
cles' which are an elongated football shape. The characteris-
tics of their flight in a gravitational field include:

a) hovering

b) moving slowly
c) moving at speeds of 3000 k/hr and greater
d) changing direction suddenly and appearing to impart a
"force" of 100 'g' s on the craft, but with no apparent forces.
e) disappearing
f) no chemical, fossil or nuclear fuels
g) silence

h) no effect on the occupants

These characteristics cannot be explained by conventional
physics and our current technology.

The characteristics can be explained in 'The Physics Of Time"
using both gravitons and resonating electromagnetic fields.

Flying saucers can develop the above characteristics of hover-
ing, changing speed rapidly, disappearing, and being silent,
by developing:

a) an artificial graviton field in the form of a variable gravita-
tional time field in the direction of their intended flight that
is of the required intensity to cause the motion intended.

b) a resonating magnetic time field. Craft can relocate to an-
other space co-ordinate or simply disappear from sight and
radar, using resonating magnetic fields, because electromag-
netic waves, such as light from the craft or radar, can be re-
fracted within these fields.

A flying saucer can also appear blurred because reflected
light from the craft when it passes through the time field sur-
rounding the craft is differentially refracted.

Gravitons radiate from all matter and therefore to produce a
gravitational field, it is a case of controlling the existing
graviton field. This can be achieved by:

1) a field around the saucer being like a lens and refracting
the existing graviton field from the Earth into a focus in the
intended direction of travel. This would require the flying
saucer to incorporate the technology capable of producing a
time field that refracted gravitons, or

2) the base of the flying saucer being made of material which
converged reflected gravitons from the existing gravitational
field to a focus above the spacecraft, or

3) the top of the spacecraft being made of a material that re-
flected gravitons to an imaginary focus above the spacecraft
(the gravitons would be reflected below the spacecraft)

An alternative would be graviton generators located
around the base of the flying saucer that could focus a gravi-
ton field at a point in the direction of intended travel.

The intensity of the field generated by the graviton genera-
tors as a result of the sharpness of the focus and density of
gravitons would determine the speed of the craft.

Graviton Generators

Reflecting and refracting gravitons can be achieved with very
strong time fields. The other form of generating an intense
graviton field is the artificial generation of a graviton field
using graviton generators on the underside of the space-

craft. The field is then focused at a point in the direction the
occupants wish to go and the artificial gravitational field de-
veloped would allow the craft and its occupants to travel in
any direction without any force on them and at a speed de-
pendent on the intensity of the artificial field.

Consider existing graviton fields. They are produced in na-
ture by the random release of gravitons from all matter. It
happens that in heavenly bodies this random release of gravi-
tons results in a radiating field and produces what we know
as a gravitational field.

In magnetic fields there are controlled time fields produced
by magnets and called magnetic fields.

A magnet creates a magnetic field and a magnetic field is a
time field, albeit a three dimensional time field. The magnet
creates this field when the nuclear particles in the iron of the
magnet have been orientated in a direction.

Gravitons come from all matter. They too are time related
and are a single dimension of time. They create the gravita-
tional field as has been explained earlier. There must be a
way of orienting the nuclear particles in one of the elements,
or creating an artificial element, that develops a directional
graviton generator, similar to a magnetic field, only with
gravitons.

Chapter 9

The Philadelphia experiment

and Noah's ArK

an "The Physics Of Time" and "The Physics Of A Fly-
ing Saucer" lead towards an explanation of other ob-

served historical phenomena that have created world-wide in-
terest?

The circumstances and events surrounding the Philadelphia
Experiment, and the design of Noah's Ark, make them partic-
ularly interesting occurrences to examine in the light of this
new physics.

The Philadelphia Experiment

The book "The Philadelphia Experiment" written by Charles
Berlitz and William Moore

claims to be "The true story be-

hind Project Invisible", a secret experiment conducted by the
US Navy during the 2nd World War. It involves the accidental
disappearance of a destroyer during an 'electronic camouflage'
experiment at the Naval Dockyards in Philadelphia. The ship
disappeared and then reappeared several hundred miles up
the coast before returning back to the Philadelphia Naval

Dockyard. This all happened in a few minutes. It appears
fantastic, but over the years there has developed a great deal
of substance to the story. Officially the experiment never took
place.

It is interesting that the US Navy denies the experiment ever
occurred, and all records of the ship involved have been lost,
including the names of the crew, the captain of the ship and
details of any manoeuvres the ship conducted. It is a classic
cover-up.

The story apparently goes that Einstein had developed his
Unified Field Theory and became a consultant to the US
Navy during the Second World War. The Navy began experi-
menting with resonating magnetic fields on a ship called the
Eldridge to determine whether such a field could produce a
shield of electromagnetic radiation around a ship to bend and
deflect enemy radar. If the experiment worked the allied
ships would become invisible to German radar and thus re-
duce the huge losses the merchant navy was suffering. How-
ever the experiment went horribly wrong.

Certainly the US Navy had a motive to carry out such experi-
ments. Certainly Einstein had been working on his Unified
Field Theory since developing General Relativity in 1915.
And also Einstein was concerned about the Germans and
their technical know-how. But let's look further.

There is a high probability that a major cover-up exists in-
volving UFOs and it began with the US Navy and the
Philadelphia Experiment. It covers flying saucers, the suspi-
cious deaths of a number of leading scientists and retrieval of
crashed UFOs and alien contact itself.

However let us begin with the Philadelphia Experiment and
the subsequent experiments carried out by the US Navy.

The Unified Field Theory is about the unification of the grav-
itational, electric and magnetic fields. You will note earlier in
this book that for some strange reason it was the US Navy,
and not an academic institution, which initiated experiments
using atomic clocks to measure the change in time in the
Earth's gravitational field with distance from ground level,
and with the change in time that occurs with the increase in
velocity on a body.

Why was the US Navy involved in such experiments? Did
they know something about the gravitational field and time
clocks that were of military importance? They were obviously
involved in gravity experiments and the relationship of grav-
ity and time. They therefore were also concerned with verify-
ing the Theory of General Relativity because this is the be-
ginning of the path to their real interest, an understanding of
the nature of the unification of the fields.

Why was the US Navy and not a research institution in-
volved in pure physics research using atomic clocks to deter-
mine the change in the rate of time on an object at various
heights in our gravitational field and the change in the rate
of time of an object with increasing velocity? They were in-
volved because it had military interest.

Why did the US Navy require such information? Why were
they funding such a project? Had they been involved in exper-
iments which showed some areas of physics to be stranger
than fiction?

In the early stages it was probably not important to them that
others knew of the experiments. However it wasn't long, espe-
cially after the Roswell Incident and the recovery of an alien
space craft, that a wall of silence was placed on this whole
area of physics. It became, and still is today, above top
secret.

In his book "Above Top Secret", Timothy Good outlines the
high level of secrecy that surrounds the cover-up of UFO's and
alien visits to Earth. The book is forwarded by former Admiral
of the Fleet, The Lord Hill-Norton GCB, former Chief of
Britain's Defence Staff.

Why would the US Navy want to conduct tests with atomic
clocks, unless they had a reason? Here is the reason.

The story begins with the father of modern physics Albert Ein-
stein. Einstein developed his Special Theory Of Relativity in
1905 which formulates the time change on a particle as it in-
creases its velocity. In 1915 he used this theory and developed
the General Theory Of Relativity, which is a 4 dimensional
space-time theory on gravity. Both theories involve a deep un-
derstanding of the nature of "time".

From 1915 Einstein devoted a major part of his time trying to
develop a 'unified field theory'. This theory, as previously dis-
cussed involves the unification of the fields of gravity, electric-
ity and magnetism. Einstein, so the story is told, spent the
rest of his life trying to develop a unified field theory.

When Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, Einstein,
who was a German and a Jew, realised his life was under
threat and obtained a position at Princeton University.

Although Einstein was a pacifist, he understood the threat
Hitler posed to the world and at the beginning of World War 2
wrote a letter to President Roosevelt warning him about the
likely development of nuclear weapons by the Germans and en-
couraged the US to develop such a weapon first. It is generally
accepted that it was Einstein's letter that led to the Manhat-
tan Project which developed the world's first atomic bomb.

Einstein did not participate in the Manhattan Project. How-
ever he was involved with the military during the War as an
advisor to the US Navy. A photo of Einstein in his study on
July 24th, 1943 with Lt Cdr Frederick L. Douthit and Captain
Geoffrey E. Sage at the commencement of his work with the
US Navy's Bureau of Ordinance can be seen in the book
"Einstein. The Life And Times" by Ronald W. Clark.

Why was Einstein a consultant to the US Navy? His expertise
was pure research in theoretical physics, it was not an area
where the US Navy would approach Einstein. There has to be
a high probability that Einstein, after careful consideration, of-
fered his services in the area of his expertise where there was a
practical application, namely the work he had been doing in
'the unified field theory'.

And what did Einstein consult to the Navy? It has to have
been in an area relevant at the time to the US Navy and also
related to the unified field theory. There has to be a high prob-
ability that Einstein did consult the US Navy on a method of
making a ship invisible to enemy radar and that this could be
achieved using his understanding of the unified field theory.

Using the theory, a ship could become invisible to radar by de-

veloping an intense electromagnetic field around it and thus
cause enemy radar to be deflected away from the ship and not
back to the radar receivers. This type of field follows the for-
mula developed under 'time intensity' in the magnetic field,
namely;

= k

. q . 2 . v . a

' is the magnetic constant.

'qv' is a magnetic field . A moving (v) electric field (q) results in

a magnetic field (qv).

'a' is an acceleration and/or deceleration of the field and can be

achieved by surging the field.

Did Einstein and the US Navy use the above formula? No-one
is saying. However the method that is claimed to have been
used certainly fits the equation.

The intended experiment was to develop a magnetic field to
the required intensity around a ship, and then beam electro-
magnetic radar signals which would be refracted in the field
rather than being reflected off the ship, and thus avoid being
picked up by radar operators. The ship would be invisible to
radar.

The experiment began, as the story goes, by placing 2 powerful
magnetic generators a small distance apart at one end of a
ship and 2 at the other end. They would then develop an oscil-
lating magnetic field, which is as previously discussed, time in-
tensity in the magnetic field, and this should cause any radar
signals to be refracted.

If the story is accurate, Einstein obviously participated. The
experiment involved the Unified Field Theory and Einstein
was the expert in this area and a Navy consultant. Nobody
could guess such an experiment.

The experiment resulted in some very unexpected outcomes. It
was not a failure in a scientific sense, although it was a disas-
ter for the personnel involved. There was just a complete lack
of understanding as to the outcomes resulting from the
strength of the intensity of the field on Navy personnel by the
scientists involved.

However the lack of concern for the safety of personnel during
research on new technology was not uncommon during the
War and shortly afterwards. For instance, consider the atomic
tests by the British in Australia in the 1950's when military
personnel were allowed to watch atomic tests, turn their bare
backs during the explosion and then turn around to watch the
mushroom cloud. The effects on their health were devastating.

The same experimental approach appears to have happened
with the Philadelphia Experiment.

Crew were allowed to wander around on the deck of the ship
during the experiment. Many had metal pieces of equipment
on, like belt buckles, others had compasses in their hands. Few
had any form of protective clothing such as heavy duty rubber
coats over their entire body.

It is interesting that the aliens appear to wear tight fitting
space suits with a rubber based type material, goggles and no
metal extras. The material of their space suits obviously pro-

100

tects them from electromagnetic radiation.

The Philadelphia Experiment used a recently built ship called
the "Eldridge" and magnetic generators were placed at either
end of the ship. The generators on the ship were started. The
magnetic field was applied. The crew on the deck of the ship
were exposed to a very strong intense resonating magnetic field.
The ship and its crew disappeared, then "materialised" at the
Norfolk port facilities for a short time two hundred miles up the
coast and then returned to the Philadelphia Dockyard , all
within a matter of minutes.

When the magnetic field was turned off, some sailors had their
arms and bodies caught up in the metal of the ship's deck. Oth-
ers were able to walk through walls. Others during their expo-
sure to the field caught fire as a result of wearing or carrying
metal objects. All the crew on the deck of the ship went men-
tally insane. One crew member later "walked thru his quarters'
wall in sight of his wife and 2 children ...... 2 other crew mem-
bers were never seen again....two others went up in flames,
they caught fire while carrying small boat compasses....they
burnt for 18 days."

The ship prior to trials was the "DE 173 " and later named the
"Eldridge". It was used in the dockyard experiments and the sea
trials. It was during the sea trials that sailors on neighbouring
ships saw and later leaked the experiments. One sailor on a
neighbouring ship during sea trials was able to "shove my arm
up to the elbow, into this unique force field as that field flowed,
surging powerfully in a counterclockwise direction around the
little experimental Navy ship, the DE 173. The ship had a
sheet of pure electricity as it flowed...(This) flow was strong

101

enough to almost knock me completely off balance.... it
began as a humming sound, quickly built up ....to a hum-
ming whispering sound, and then increased to a strong
sizzling buzz (like a) rushing torrent ....I watched as
thereafter the DE 173 became rapidly invisible to human
eyes. And yet, the precise shape of the keel and under-

hull of that .... ship

remained

impressed into the ocean

water as it and my own ship sped along somewhat side

by side and close to inboards..... (I was wearing) hip-high

rubber sailor's boots and sou'wester coat ..... my entire

body was not within that force field when it reached
maximum strength-density, repeat, density, and so I was
not knocked down but my arm and hand was only
pushed backwards with the fields flow."

The sailor was lucky to have the protection of his wet
weather clothing made from rubber.

No sailors from the Eldridge have been found or volun-
teered to come forward. However it is known that those
alive after the experiments were discharged as medically
unfit and probably given a pension. Obviously the US
Navy put pressure on those involved and their relatives
to keep the matter a secret. This has been achieved on
other secret projects quite successfully. It is interesting
that the US Navy lost all records decades ago on the lo-
cation of the Eldridge during its sea trials, its crew and
its service with the Navy.

Did the Philadelphia Experiment take place? If it didn't,
why the cover-up? What was Einstein consulting on to
the US Navy? It is a high probability that as an expert
on the Unified Field Theory, this was Einstein's area of

102

involvement. Why did the US Navy conduct experiments with
atomic clocks after the war? It certainly is a strange area for a
navy to be involved! Did Einstein give the Navy the secrets to
his Unified Field Theory? Or was Einstein trialling in the
Philadelphia Experiment a theory that went wrong and the US
Navy afterwards decided to take it further?

The strange death of Dr M K Jessup, an expert in astronomy
and mathematics, is also very suspicious. He wrote a book
called "The Case For The UFO". The Office Of Naval Research
in Washington had meetings with Dr Jessup after they re-
ceived copies of his book with writings in the columns outlining
additional information involving the Navy and others in mat-
ters on the nature of gravity.

Dr Jessup was the one who initially began the trail leading to
the disclosure of the "Philadelphia Experiment". He was later
involved in a serious car accident and then apparently commit-
ted suicide. There was no autopsy on his body. Why is it that
so many scientists involved in research and commercial activ-
ity in the areas related to time fields have suspicious deaths?

The Office Of Naval Research in Washington appears to have
been involved in relativity, UFO sighting co-ordination and
antigravity research. Maybe they have some answers!

Equally fascinating is the story of Noah's Ark and the specific
details outlined in the Bible, with regard to its construction.

103

The Ark

To understand the reason for the unique construction of
Noah's Ark, the physics behind the construction must first
be explained.

Earlier it was hypothesised how an oscillating electromag-
netic field produces an intense time field that can be used to
surround an object such as a spaceship and that this can be
used for inter-galactic space travel.

The use of oscillating electromagnetic fields is the basis of
the physics used in the Philadelphia Experiment. Unfortu-
nately the scientists were unaware of the consequence. The
ships crew ended up either dead or in mental institutions.
The survivor from another ship that sailed close to the El-
dridge during the experiments was only saved because it
was raining and in his own words he was wearing a
"sou'wester". This is a thick, hooded, rubber raincoat.

In the formulae for electric fields it can be seen that an in-
tense electric field can be developed by dq/dt which is nor-
mally expressed as a current (i). A current is protected by
by insulation which is rubber. A magnetic field is a moving
electric field, so rubber and similar compounds are a protec-
tion against both electric and magnetic fields.

Further the aliens all wear what appears to be skin tight
space suits and goggles probably of a compound like rubber
to protect them from electromagnetic radiation.

Now consider what happened to Noah.

104

Genesis 6: 11

"Now the Earth was corrupt in God's sight and was full of vi
olence. God saw how corrupt the Earth had become, for all the
people on Earth had corrupted their ways. So God said to
Noah, 'I am going to put an end to all people, for the Earth is
filled with violence because of them. I am surely going to de-
stroy both them and the Earth. So make yourself an ark of cy-
press wood; make rooms in it and coat it with pitch inside and
out. This ark is to be 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet
high. Make a roof for it and finish the ark to within 18 inches
of the top. Put a door in the side of the ark and make lower,
middle and upper decks.'"

Noah was given very specific instructions on how to build the
ark. It was made of cypress wood. It was to have pitch placed
on the inside and the outside over the entire boat.

The ark was also completely enclosed. It had a roof and the
top was covered. Gen 8:6 "After forty days Noah opened the
window he had made in the ark and sent out a raven..." and '
further on in Gen 8:13 "... the water had dried up from the
Earth. Noah then removed the covering from the ark and saw
that the surface of the ground was dry." The ark was com-
pletely covered. There was no deck or bridge like the old sail-
ing ships or a normal boat for the occupants to walk around on
during the day and observe the weather or the scenery.

Why was Noah given such a strange design for a boat? Why
wasn't he told to just build a boat and fill it with family and
animals and ride out the weather. The answer is that the arc
was more than a boat.

105

The design of the ark was that of a 3 dimensional time ma-
chine. The occupants were protected by Cyprus timber and the
pitch (tar) on both sides of it. There appears to have been no
metal nails, only wood. Everyone had to stay inside. No-one
came out until they were told to, after the flood had gone. The
design was given to Noah by a supernatural, "God".

Noah built the ark and loaded it up, closed the door and it
started to rain. The angels, or aliens, only needed to install the
generators of the magnetic time field and the arc was a modern
spaceship capable of travelling anywhere in the universe, or a
"time capsule".

Noah probably took the animals on board which were of his lo-
cal world. The 'angels' in their crafts could have rescued the
other animals from other parts of the world.

Noah and the ark is no fable, it could actually have happened.
The ark was far better designed and Noah was far better in-
structed than the US Navy's Eldridge and its crew in the
Philadelphia Experiment. The ark could protect its occupants
from any electromagnetic time field with pitch and timber.

Noah, his family and animals were instructed to remain inside
the ark protected from the field well after the rain had stopped
and until after the flood had receded and the land completely
dry. This may have taken years or even decades if it occurred
as a result of melting and then freezing the polar caps, but to
Noah and his cargo it was only seven months. Someday in the
future when our space explorers travel near the speed of light
to other locations in the universe, it will be accepted that they
will return having only aged a few months whilst those left be-
hind are decades older.

106

Chapter 1

Glimpse into the Future

and a Note Of Caution

Did the Philadelphia Experiment take place? Is Noah and
the Ark a fable? Is the star the wise men followed to
Bethlehem, and which then hovered over the stable to show
them the location of the manger, a myth? Did the Israelites
follow a flying saucer out of Egypt? Are there angels or
aliens?

Is it possible that our base for understanding the universe is
from a primitive level of physics? Physics research has only
been seriously studied for a century or two. Some galaxies
are over a billion years older than our galaxy. Surely we have
to accept the fact that there are more advanced intelligences
in the universe and that they have the means to visit the
Earth, and have been doing so for many thousands of years.

So what are the implications that this physics has
explored? What future technologies are possible? How will
they benefit people in the future? What are the possible dan-

108

gers?

"The Physics Of Time" identifies gravitational fields, electric
fields, magnetic fields, nuclear particles and mass all as vari-
ous dimensions of time.

If these fields are considered force fields, such as the force of
gravity, electrostatic force, the magnetic force and the nu-
clear force as they are today, then our solution to separating
atoms or atomic particles held by these "forces" is that of us-
ing force and temperature and energy.

When a rocket is used to go to the moon, a force is used to
break through the Earth's gravitational field. When iron ore
is smelted in a blast furnace to produce steel, energy and
high temperatures are used to break the electrostatic bonds
between the atoms of iron and oxygen. When the physicists
examine the inner parts of the atom they do so in particle ac-
celerators where atomic nuclei are bombarded with high ve-
locity particles.

Should we determine the structure of a house by using a bull-
dozer and then examining the bricks and timber left in the
pile of rubbish? Can this method identify the purpose of the
internal use of the house? The answer is that only a limited
knowledge comes from such an approach.

If nuclear particles are dimensional time fields and the elec-
trostatic bonds holding atoms together are time fields, and
not force fields, then we can separate electrostatic bonds and
examine the structure of nuclear particles using time fields.

A blast furnace can be replaced by a cold furnace. A cold fur-

109

nace can be used to develop an intense electrostatic field to al-
low atoms and atomic particles to separate at room tempera-
ture.

Time fields can be used to allow hydrogen nuclei to come close
enough to fuse into helium to give clean energy. This elimi-
nates the use of fossil fuels, petroleum and the nuclear fission
of uranium.

New and strong materials can be produced using time fields to
bond individual atoms, rather than the current method of
melting and cooling and creating stresses within a mass, as is
the case with iron and aluminium smelting. Aircraft for exam-
ple could be a fraction of their current weight. Alien space craft
are apparently constructed of these light weight materials.

By better understanding the electrostatic bonds between water
molecules we can control the weather. We can make it rain in
deserts, we can stop it raining to prevent floods.

We can control cyclones and hurricanes as well.

Why do cancers occur? Is it because new cells develop a differ-
ent time clock and multiply faster than normal cells? If it is,
then it probably results from an abnormal time field being pre-
sent when the cell forms. By understanding time fields we can
prevent cancers occurring, and detect those that have formed,
especially in their early stages.

This new physics also of course explains, as outlined in this
book, the new technology which can lead to the development of
"flying saucers".

110

The technology for the above concepts and others are in my
pending patents taken by the Australian Department of De-
fence and the Australian Safeguards Office. Funding is re-
quired to develop the technologies, and for some reason there
are glass ceilings within the science/government/defence bu-
reaucracies.

Furthermore a high technology listening device developed by
the CIA and used by the Australian Security Intelligence Or-
ganisation was found in our home. It was verified by a senior
manager of a major electronics company.

Why are scientific journals so reluctant to comment on the
"physics of time" outlined in this book? One journal replied to
my physics paper as follows;

"The Editorial Panel has now reviewed your paper and after
careful consideration , I regret to advise you that it has de-
cided not to accept your paper for publication for the follow-
ing reasons.

The panel has approached numerous engineers and as-
tronomers for a review of the paper. Unfortunately those ap-
proached are reluctant to comment on the paper and the
panel has now decided that the above publication is not suit-
able for publication of your paper."

On questioning the journal about its policy on commenting on
all papers, the editor decided to have the paper reviewed by
additional experts.

Several months later they replied as follows;

111

Further to our letter to you on February 3, 1997, advising

that your paper was not acceptable for publication. We have
asked another 3 experts to review your manuscript. Once
again, the reviewers have recommended to the editorial panel
that the paper should not be accepted for publication.

The standard practice ....... in such a case would be to enclose

the reviewers' comments for your information and to provide
an insight as to why the paper has not been accepted. I un-
derstand from previous conversations with you that you were
eager for us to provide specific comments on your paper's con-
tent. We regret that we are unable to provide them. The re-
viewers have chosen not to make any comments to the au-
thor, in this instant...."

The cover-up extends beyond the US military. It involves the
senior bureaucracy, the security service and police, and the
scientific community in most of the advanced countries. The
X-files is not fiction but fact.

The Future

The exciting area for the future is of course intergalactic
travel and communicating with other intelligences in the uni-
verse.

I have detailed the physics of intergalactic space ships, but
what form of intergalactic communications is most likely
used in the cosmos?

112

Intergalactic Communications

Our current method of communications is using electromag-
netic waves, as radio waves, microwaves etc. But this is fine
on Earth or in our solar system. But who wants to wait years
for a signal? In intergalactic terms, electromagnetic waves
can be stopped by other masses, such as suns, planets and
dust, they can be interfered with and bent even by relatively
weak gravitational fields, and even primitive intelligences
such as ours on Earth, can listen to them.

Graviton waves are by far a better form of intergalactic com-
munication. They travel through all matter without signifi-
cant deflection. This is important when communicating be-
tween galaxies and across the universe. They also probably
travel at the cube squared of the speed of light as discussed,
so the time delay is minimised. They are probably used as
radar for space craft travelling near or at the speed of light,
because of their faster speeds than light.

A graviton generator could be an important piece of equip-
ment for space travel. It can be used for the propulsion of a
spacecraft, for radar and for intergalactic communications.

Does NASA already know about extra-terrestrial life in the
universe? Is this the reason it is not interested in committing
any funds to the "Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence
(SETI)" program? This program is using conventional astro-
nomical dishes to scan electromagnetic radiation from the
cosmos. Maybe NASA realises that extra-terrestrials do not
use electromagnetic radiation for communications!

113

A Note Of Caution

The possibilities in this technology for exploring new frontiers
are exciting beyond even our expectations. However with any
substantial advance, there are the dangers that it can be mis-
used for our own destruction.

We have had the choice with nuclear power of using it for
peaceful purposes or total mutual annihilation. We are gradu-
ally pulling back from the brink, but this is for only one tech-
nology, nuclear fission.

This new physics, the "Physics Of Time", can turn the hydro-
gen from a cup of water into a weapon that can destroy a city.
Is this why Einstein conferred with Prof Bernard Russell, a
pacifist? Was Einstein aware of the potential of the new
physics in the Unified Field Theory? Was he concerned about
the impact of the technology and the then development of the
human race? The answers to these questions are unknown but
are probably "yes".

However without the new physics we will not survive. We can-
not continue using fossil fuels and destroying our environ-
ment. But can we handle the new technology? That is the big
question!

Do we have to develop a new level of brotherly understanding
in parallel with our development in technology to survive?

Biblical descriptions of unexplained phenomena such as flying
saucers, angels and aliens, and other miracles are surrounded
by the messages of love for God and love for your neighbour.
Do we require such a level of spirituality and righteousness

114

References

(for full details see bibliography)

1. Hynek, Dr J Allen. The UFO Experience. A Scientific
Inquiry.

2. Walton, Travis. The Walton Experience.

3. Downing, Rev Dr Barry H.The Bible and Flying Saucers.

4. Emenegger, Robert. UFO's Past Present and Future.

5. Calder, Nigel. Einstein's Universe.

6. Calder, Nigel Einstein's Universe

Calder, Nigel Einstein's Universe

Berlitz, Charles and Moore William. The Philadelphia

Experiment

Clark Ronald W. Einstein. The Life and Times

10. The NIV Study Bible. New International Version.
Zondervan.

118

Bibliography

* Berlitz, Charles and Moore, William. The Philadel-
phia Experiment. Souvenir Press, London, 1979.

* Calder, Nigel. Einstein's Universe. British
Broadcasting Corporation, London 1979.

* Clark, Ronald W. Einstein. The Life and Times.

Avon Books, New York, 1971

* Downing, Rev Dr Barry H. The Bible and Flying

Saucers. Sphere Books, London, 1974

* Emenegger, Robert. UFO's Past, Present and

Future Ballantine Books, New York, 1974

* Good, Timothy. Above Top Secret. The Worldwide

UFO Cover-up. Grafton Books, London, 1989.

* Hynek, Dr J Allen.The UFO Experience. A Scien-
tific Enquiry. Corgi Books, London, 1974.

* The NIV Study Bible New International Version.
Zondervan, 1985.

* Walton, Travis. The Walton Experience Berkley

119