1
Elżbieta Płóciennik, Ph. D.
Departament of Pre-school and Early – learning Pedagogy
Faculty of Educational Sciences
the University of Lodz
Dynamic Picture in Advancement of Early Childhood Development
Published in: Sobczak, A., Znajmiecka – Sikora M. (eds.), 2012, Development in the
perspective of the human science – opportunities and threats, Lodz: Wydawnictwo UŁ, (pp.
115-128)
The beginning of school education marks the opening of a pivotal chapter in every
person’s life, a period which affects further success or failure in adulthood. It is from school
and their families that young people acquire knowledge and abilities which enable them to
accomplish their future goals successfully.
The educational atmosphere, as well as social and material conditions, constitute the most
significant factors which contribute to the positive development of an individual. The
educational atmosphere ought to be based on friendliness and the acceptance of the individual
skills, capabilities, interests and needs of every person. Such an atmosphere encourages not
only shaping and maintaining high self-esteem and self-confidence based on major as well as
minor accomplishments, but also a successful development and acquiring more and more
complex abilities. It also encourages the differentiation of requirements and motivation. This in
turn stimulates an individual’s high activity and enables individual capabilities to be utilized in
the educational process.
However, not every individual is a success at school and in life up to the standards of
their own potential and developmental capabilities. Such is the case of the underachievement
syndrome. Significantly, the basis and the main cause of this problem, which affects intelligent
and gifted individuals, does not lie in the lack of abilities. It lies in the lack of opportunity to
utilize those abilities for various reasons.
1. Underachievement syndrom
The underachievement syndrome is often confined only to the school environment. There
it takes the form of a discrepancy between student’s grades or school behaviour, and his or her
high potential, intelligence and creativity assessed through standardized testing and the
2
opinions of teachers and parents (Ekiert-Grabowska, 1994). As pedagogical research shows,
the underachievement syndrome can affect up to 10% of the student population (Karpińska,
2002).
The underachievement syndrome is believed to be caused by the following activators:
educational methods, school organization, social environment at school and certain attitudes of
teachers. These can include the preference for imitative rather than creative students, the
promotion of conformity and convergence skills, and the suppression of initiative,
independence and the originality of thinking by using traditional and verbal methods of
teaching (sf.: Wiechnik, 1987; Dyrda, 2007). On the basis of my own observations and
experience I can find the same factors (either activating or escalating the problem of
underachievement or suppressing the natural activity of a child) in the kindergarten
environment unless the process of education follows the rules of support, inclusion, integration
and comprehensive development.
A school grade can be also an activating factor of the underachievement syndrome. A
nominal grade, as opposed to a supporting assessment or a formative assessment, may lower
student’s motivation to learn if it is unfair, if its main goal is to criticize the student in front of
the class, or if it is overused and utilized as an educational or statistical measure. What is more,
a traditional (nominal) grade usually indicates the extent of student’s inability to perform
certain tasks or lack of certain knowledge. Such a situation necessitates focusing on student’s
mistakes and failure rather than accomplishments and success. What is more, the nominal
grade does not constitute a component of an appropriate pedagogical diagnosis-it does not
reflect student’s skills and capabilities and does not indicate his or her problems. As a result,
the planning of any therapeutic and compensatory actions, which are aimed at filling in the
gaps of knowledge and practical skills, are significantly hampered. According to B. Niemierko
(2002), the system of grading students’ educational achievements is the most neglected field of
didactics and makes following generations question the validity and objectivity of nominal
assessment. And it is the lack of objectivity that leads to students’ low self-esteem and
disrespect for both the teacher and the students’ responsibilities.
Although nominal grades are not used in kindergartens, there still is a problem of the
correct assessment of a child’s achievements in accordance with his or her abilities and skills.
The assessment should be based on systematic and accurate diagnosis of the child’s
competences made by a teacher through observation, registering and analysis of the child’s
behaviour in all the fields of his or her skills and activities. Nevertheless, such assessment
should not only aim at informing the child about his or her abilities and skills, but first of all it
3
should help to develop educational process taking into account of operational aims and
monitoring the child’s progress, his or her self-esteem, being active and involved in achieving
further competences.
Self-confidence and self-acceptance play a key role in the processes of building self-
esteem and motivation to overcome learning difficulties because they shape students’
behaviour in task situations, their motivation and the effort they put into working. For that
reason, they also affect carrying out school responsibilities and learning success. Low self-
esteem can also influence student’s non-school interpersonal relationships, satisfying safety
and identity needs, as well as the attitude towards new situations and reluctance to take risk. As
a result, student’s aspirations for success both at school and in life may become considerably
lowered (Dyrda, 2000, s. 134-135). According to the research by B. Dyrda (2007), most
students afflicted by the underachievement syndrome demonstrated disproportionate self-
esteem in relation to their intellectual capabilities.
The psycho-pedagogical literature suggests various measures to prevent this phenomenon
from expanding, such as therapeutic programs based on redefining the role of a teacher in the
classroom. A teacher-expert would then transform into an advisor, an animator, an observer, a
listener and, finally, a partner. Such a teacher automatically and quite naturally activates
processes which prevent the underachievement syndrome similarly to the model of therapy for
the underachievement syndrome based on successoriented education, as devised by S.M.
Baum, J. Renzulli, T. P. Hebert (Dyrda, 2000). The therapy, which predisposes students
towards success, engenders the self-fulfilling prophecy mechanism: while utilizing their
cognitive and creative capabilities, students explore their awareness and motivation to act and
take effort to achieve given goals. The following table presents this model with the possible
results of the underachievement syndrome therapy:
Table Nr 1. Underachievement Syndrome Therapy by S.M. Baum, J. Renzulli, T.P. Hebert.
Underachievement
Syndrome
Therapy, influence,
intervention
Satisfactory school
results
Emotional problems
Teacher as a mentor
(advisor)
Understanding oneself
and one’s needs
Learning problems
Developing student’s
interests
Self-regulation
Social functioning problems
Focusing on student’s
strong points, developing
high self-confidence
Positive relations with
adults, positive influence
of peer group
Inadequate curriculum
Mutual respect, teacher
and student are
subjects in nurturing
and learning
Curriculum adjusted
to student’s capabilities
4
Inadequate teaching
methods
Activating teaching
methods, problem
based methods
Student motivated
to learn
Source: Dyrda, 2000.
However, as people are unable to succeed up to their potential in many areas of life, the
underachievement syndrome should not be limited only to the school context. The factors
which activate the underachievement syndrome can also be found among the changes which
occur in the modern society. The psycho-pedagogical literature suggests the following causes
of this problem, all of which are of social origin: unstable family model, overworked parents,
the disorganization of the family rules and principles, the liberalization of moral norms,
incoherent influence of each of the parents. Other factors which are believed to have an
adverse effect on the achievements of an individual could include the consumerist lifestyle and
models for success promoted by the media, but also the modern society competitiveness
pressure which provokes mental tension and stress. Still different causes can be found in the
family environment: the standards of behaviour, single parentage, sibling rivalry,
overprotective attitude towards a longed-for or a frail child and disproportionate expectations
(too high or too low) of child’s achievements may all contribute to the underachievement
syndrome (sf.: Rimm, 1994; Dyrda, 2000, 2007).
The characteristics of a pre-schooler’s development may play a vital role in building the
child’s behaviour model in the social environment since it is a family that sets the most
important example of behaviour and establishes norms of conduct, very often imprinted in the
personality for the whole life and influencing the individual’s educational success and failures.
The examples of internal factors which hamper the accomplishments of an individual
include: disturbance or damage of the central nervous system, emotional disorders, physical
defects and somatic disease. All the above factors hinder the functioning of an individual at
school and in the society (absences at school, numerous sick leaves, frequenting hospitals,
medical rehabilitations, sanatoriums, the meetings of occupational therapy, etc.) and thus
constitute the root of all the problems, including educational problems. The underachievement
syndrome can also be activated by low self-esteem, lack of self-acceptance or lack of others’
recognition-the effects of health and school problems, as well as failure in building social
relations, which may result from disturbed relationships with peers, parents or teachers. What
is more, the disproportion between expectations and actual achievements may be influenced by
special talents and creative abilities. A gifted child/student can display oversensitivity in some
of the following spheres (Dyrda, 2007, s. 22-23):
5
– intellectual (sensitivity is exhibited by changeability, impatience, inquisitiveness,
etc.),
– emotional (excessive sensitivity leads to impulsiveness, obstinacy, withdrawal,
etc.),
– psychomotor (oversensitivity causes heightened tension, impatience, agitation,
heightened activity, etc.),
– imaginary (high sensitivity leads to absent-mindedness, seclusion, fantasizing,
daydreaming),
– sensory (oversensitivity causes excessive facial expression and gesticulation,
twitches, inadequate reactions).
High sensitivity of a gifted and creative individual may result in behaviour differently
interpreted by parents, teachers and peers. While in certain situations such behaviour will be
approved, in others it may be regarded as antisocial, egotistic or aggressive. The possible
differences of the social reception of such behaviour are contrasted in the table Nr 2:
Table Nr 2. Behaviour of a gifted individual
Feature
Positive reception
Negative reception
activity
motivation-driven,
energetic, has wide
interests
overactive, stubborn and
intransigent, may be
disorganized, focuses excessively
on one field of interest,
has concentration difficulties
creativity
predisposed towards
problem solving
does not like routine activities
communicative
competence
has rich vocabulary,
can debate, argue and
persuade with ease
tends to manipulate people
around, is quarrelsome, intransigent,
invents endless excuses
independence
independent, prefers
to work individually
nonconformist, is quarrelsome,
may be noisy and pretentious,
lacks discipline and opposes
instructions of parents or teachers,
has teamwork problems
sensitivity
sensitive and empathic
oversensitive to criticism and
judgment, egocentric
cognitive skills
fast learner, learns new
things willingly and
with ease, enjoys
challenges connected
to interests, vast but
often “non-school”
knowledge
impatient, gets bored fast, does
not complete assignments
which are too easy or not
connected to interests, puts
minimal effort into schoolwork,
focused on individual interests
and problems
responsibility
high expectations
of self and others
perfectionist, intolerant, does
not finish work which
is imperfect, often gives up
after first failure
6
morality
high level of moral
judgment
does not acknowledge authority
and nurturing rules
cognitive
curiosity
interested in the world
around, has many
interests
asks many questions at the
same time, diversified interests
prevent focus on specialization
sense
of humour
good sense of humour
may exaggerate in making fun
of others, may be cynical
imagination
developed visual or
spatial thinking, tends to fantasize and
daydream
makes things up, lives
in a world of his/her own,
secludes him/herself
Source: compilation by the author based on the sources: Rimm, 1994; Dyrda 1997, 2000.
Many psycho-pedagogical sources draw attention to the fact that school education which
does not develop students’ creativity, only lowers their cognitive curiosity and blunts their
interests. Such school does not encourage question-based thinking (Szmidt, 2006). Moreover, it
provides strong negative reinforcement based on negative messages, such as “wrong!,” “don’t
fantasize!,” “don’t be clever!” Additionally, it hinders imagination, as well as intuitive and
divergent thinking. As a result, student’s independence, openness, creativity and self-
confidence are hampered (sf.: Dobrołowicz, 1995), which may ultimately lead to a negative
attitude towards school in general.
In Poland there are no universally operating schools which develop students’ special
abilities, as there is no system of supporting gifted students in the pursue of their individual
goals and unique (artistic and social) interests. On the contrary, the school system demands
high results in typical school subjects without considering students unique needs regarding
their interests and education, as well as their diverse ways of learning. One cannot say that
such a school exists for the student, for it is the student who is to adapt to the school model of
functioning and education.
Still educators and professionals involved in the development and education of children
at a pre-school age are seeking ideas and methods which will help them to prepare the child for
the next stages of education in an optimum way. Creating proper conditions for identifying and
stimulating imagination as well as creative thinking and skills of the child when performing
various development tasks may therefore be essential for the preparation of the individual for
an active and creative life (sf.: Szmidt, 2007).
2. A dynamic pictures technique as a stimulus for imagination and thinking
development
7
A specific and indispensible means in the educational process of a pre-schooler are
various illustrations and pictures wildly used by teachers as substitute examples of the
surrounding reality.
Pictures activate the situation, they evoke curiosity ant the ability to carry out tasks on
one’s own. To understand an illustration, you should see many things which are not visible in
it. The illustration is a fragment of life (or a fantasy novel), stationary at some point in its
lifetime - you have to imagine the movements and actions of a person being motionless in the
picture, guess what proceeded the depicted moment in order to draw right conclusions on the
topic, content, and “thoughts” of the presented image. Its understanding is therefore the result
of perception as well as completion of the content by imagination, abstract thinking and
reasoning.
As perceived S. Szuman (1951) children do not limit their perception of a picture to bare
naming the depicted object and creatures. They imagine different events and situations
connected with the picture in which both the objects or creatures act, reason and investigate
against the background. The mind of a small child does not only copy the picture’s individual
elements, but explores the image - notices different things, classifies and combines them which
finally makes the child create his/her own ideas and conclusions (Szuman, 1936/1937). Thus
work with the picture should be directed to “explain” the image (and not just enumerate the
objects or describe and name the activities of the people), which means spotting the details,
making comparisons, detecting possible relations and the main and most important subject of
the picture.
Images teach concentration, memorizing and reasoning which support the intellectual
development of a child. They provide the material for creative work and stimulate the
motivation to use the material to do something original. Tests, trainings and techniques applied
in psychometrics which incorporate the elements of perception, reproduction and
transformation of images, show the importance of imagination and visual thinking used for
determining the individual’s current level of the development of their abilities (sf.: Matczak,
1994; Karwowski, 2006; Szmidt, 2008). The above mentioned abilities and skills are being
developed primarily by dynamic pictures. These are the images of situations in which the
content may change under the influence of imagination (Młodkowski, 1998).
a. The dynamic pictures technique
8
The technique of dynamic pictures developed by me is a set of images, some of them
depicting scenes or events whose content may change under the influence of imagination. Due
to the partial indeterminacy, ambiguity and allusion in the content of these images, they require
not only description, but also the explanation of the cause-effect relationships, some
interpretation and completion. With the above mentioned advantages these pictures can be a
stimulus for a child to create his/her own stories on the basis of imagined or anticipated events,
which initiate or determine the illustrated situation. What is more, they may also inspire the
child to invent their own titles, characters, stories, adventures, unusual architectural features,
vehicles, objects and events (Płóciennik i Dobrakowska, 2009).
When implementing this technique, I noticed that creating an image-inspired stories by
children can provide a teacher with some information about the child’s vocabulary, speech
making abilities, attention span, memory, and above all - about the child’s understanding of the
visual content, the degree of his/her imagination being stimulated, cause and effect thinking
and the involvement in the content perceived in the picture.
The dynamic pictures technique which I developed has become an essential element of
the pedagogical experiment. The main objective of this pedagogical research was to investigate
and describe the effect of the dynamic pictures technique on the development of creative
abilities in a child in their late pre-school age. Therefore I formulated the following research
problem: “What is the impact of the dynamic pictures technique on the development of
selected creative abilities of 5 and 6 year old children?” This problem has been divided into
more specific issues: “What impact does the dynamic pictures technique have on the
development of the abilities of generalization of verbal and visual content (logical thinking),
inference (logical thinking), to give reasons (critical thinking), imaginative capacities
(imagination), commitment and perseverance in the task (motivation), the readiness to take
cognitive risk (motivation), flexibility, originality, and elaboration (divergent thinking).
The research, whose main aim was to verify the effectiveness of the dynamic picture
technique in developing creative abilities of a pre-schooler, confirmed that creativity should be
developed and diagnosed among all school children because revealing and activating potential
abilities is only possible when they are being stimulated in accordance with the dynamics of
their development in different fields and different areas of the undertaken activity. In addition,
the studies also confirmed the dependence of divergent thinking on other skills and motivation
- their development is through the use of different and varied methods of problem and heuristic
learning that foster integration and development of all cognitive processes and mechanisms on
9
the foundation of motivation to act (Płóciennik, 2010). The studies confirm the findings of
other studies that were conducted in the past on:
– the effectiveness of training works to increase the flow of ideational (number of
ideas),
– the effectiveness of wider integration of creative abilities and environmental
conditions for improving product quality,
– the effectiveness of the environmental conditions to stimulate thinking in relation to
pre-school children,
– improving the results of “image-visual” thinking through the integration of imagery
and verbal systems during tests,
– the effectiveness of creativity training in relation to creative competences acquired by
pre-school children in the course of learning,
– selection of learning conditions for a child to match goals or objectives set or planned
by a teacher of elementary education and ways to monitor children’s work and
activate them (Płóciennik, 2010, s. 185-186).
After applying the dynamic pictures technique higher ideational fluency and originality
of children’s ideas in comparison with the group has been noticed in posttest studies. It was
visible both when the children invented titles, formed associations to the content of the
pictures, came up with epithets, analogies and comparisons of selected objects as well as when
they developed interesting ideas to complete the content of the pictures with probable and
improbable events.
b. Supporting the child’s development – the analysis of individual cases
Further analysis of my previous research have revealed the possibility of applying the
dynamic picture technique both in therapy and supporting the child’s development. Below I
present the description of individual cases which show examples of reducing the level of
difficulties in performing certain tasks and activities.
A child with an identification number E-1/KW/19
He is a six-year old boy, an only child brought up in a two-parent family, attending the
kindergarten for two years. Both parents have secondary education (mother is a nurse, father- a
10
knitter). They have pointed out in the survey that they do not devote enough time to their child
and the child’s main occupation at home is watching cartoons and playing with blocks. They
have also admitted that their son is very keen on playing and talking with adults as well as
being read books by them.
As for his developmental achievements, the parents have noticed his spontaneous
curiosity, eagerness to play and reluctance to stop. However, as for his developmental
problems, the parents have mentioned difficulties in clear articulation of sounds, shyness, lack
of interest in doing jigsaws and a tendency to get easily tired while performing tasks which
need more concentration. The survey also shows that the child must have suffered from some
health disorders as the mother consulted various specialists such as a pulmonologist, an
allergist and a gastroenterologist.
Teachers in the kindergarten have noticed that the boy most often chooses only
construction games. Among his developmental achievements they point out his friendliness
towards peers and a lot of skills in a perceptive-cognitive sphere: intense concentration on a
task, the ability to analyze and synthesize, to notice the differences and similarities and to build
cause-result relations as well as good memory and fast remembering things. However, the
teachers have also observed the boy’s manual and communication problems, the dislike of
artistic and expressive activities, shyness, lack of self-confidence, unwillingness to participate
in new and more difficult tasks. You may find the comparison of raw results achieved by the
child in a table below.
Table nr 3. The comparison of pre-test and post-test raw results of a child from an experimental group with the
highest increase of an artistic skill indicator.
The source: own study based on the results of own research (Płóciennik, 2010).
In the pre-test phase the child chose a task from a box “easy tasks”, however, in the post-
test he picked “more difficult tasks”. When thinking up a title for a picture, in both the pre-test
and post-test the child came up with one title, however, as for the titles for stories, in the pre-
test he put forward one idea whereas in the post-test - several ideas. When creating a picture
group of the variables
Pre-test
Post-test
raw results of
a child
avarage results
of a group
raw results of
a child
avarage results
of a group
general abilities
10
9,74
19
14,3
task commitment
10
12,5
17
13,1
creative skills
23
(including 6
original ideas)
22
(with average
7.5)
63
(including 22
original ideas)
32,5
(with average
14.0)
11
story, in the pre-test he mixed up the pictures while in the post-test he put them correctly. Both
in the pre-test and post-test the boy was able to explain logically the order of the pictures and
create the content of the story. When completing a picture, in the pre-test he added 6 extra
elements to the original and in the post-test – 7. Both in the pre-test and post-test the boy
painted science-fiction reality (in the pre-test: “little rainbow people”, “little monsters”,
“volcanoes”, in the post-test: “a dessert man”, “a snake called Water”, “a town which is
opening out”, “a volcano on a snow island”). Despite some manual difficulties, the boy was
able to express his thoughts in the picture. There was a small
disproportion
in the scope of
ideas used for describing the picture (in the pre-test – 3 epithets, in the post-test – 2).
Nevertheless, there was a discrepancy in a task involving making up rhymes for a given word
(in the pre-test – no ideas, in the post-test – 9 rhymes including 6 neologisms: koty > “oty,
moty, toty, soty, zoty, egzoty”). As for finding similar patterns in the pictures, in the pre-test the
boy put 13 pairs together and three pictures in a row for two times according to the “colour”
category. However, in the post-test he put together one row of two elements and four three-
element rows according to the “geometric figures” class. When making transformations and
specifying geometric figures in the pre-test the boy drew two objects on the basis of a circle
belonging to two categories, but in the post-test he created ten objects based on a rhomb
belonging to eight different categories. During the assessment phase of the task in the pre-test
the boy admitted that he had liked the task because “he was happy” while in the post-test he
explained that “he liked all the tasks because they were nice”. The
disproportion
between
painted pictures and created titles
was
also noticed by a competent jury and their grades are
presented in a table below.
Table nr 4. Comparing the grades given by a competent jury to the child from an experimental group with the
highest growth of an creative skill indicator.
The source: own study based on the results of own research (Płóciennik, 2010).
As the table shows the jurors assessed the output in post-test lower (the average 0,82)
than in the pre-test (the average 1,11). The analysis of the child’s achievements may indicate
the output
1 juror
2 juror
3 juror
4 juror
Pre-test Post-test Pre-test Post-test Pre-test Post-test Pre-test Post-test
the title of the
picture
0
0,25
1
1
0,25
0,25
0,25
0,5
the title of the story
1,5
0,8
1,75
1,35
1,25
1,05
1,25
1,35
transformations
0,5
0
1
1
0,5
0
0,5
0
elaboration
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
12
that the big
disproportion
between the raw results of the pre-test and the post-test does not
comply with the assessment provided by the competent jury. In the case of this child there was
an improvement of abilities in the scope of the variables groups (with the ideational fluency
being the leading one), and first of all in presenting original ideas compared to other children in
the same group (as far as 22 ideas created by the boy in the set of post-test tasks were not
repeated in E1 group).
A child with identification number E-1/PZ/23
He is a six-year boy, an only child from a single-parent family, attending a kindergarten
for the second year. His mother is a shop assistant with secondary education. In a survey she
admits spending four hours a day with her son.
At home the child is mostly keen on playing with toy cars, stuffed toys, mechanical and
construction toys, he also draws and paints, watches cartoons, does jigsaws and plays with
blocks. The child also likes the company of adults. The mother also points out that her son is
skillful at painting, constructing and dancing. In addition he has a sense of humor, asks a lot of
questions, tries to solve problems by himself, is eager to play and reluctant to stop. As for his
developmental problems she mentiones difficulties in counting, correct articulating of sounds
and focusing on one activity only, as well as aversion for mental effort and playing outdoor.
He also withdraws from new and difficult tasks. She also stresses the child’s misbehaviour and
not obeying the instructions. The mother consulted specialists (a psychologist and speech
therapist) who gave the diagnosis of hyperactivity as a result of premature birth (the boy was
born in the 25
th
week of pregnancy).
Teachers at the kindergarten have observed that the child is eager to take up different
artistic and constructive-manual activities. They have noticed only two developmental
achievements (his being friendly towards peers and perceptive skills). In addition, they have
also mentioned numerous developmental problems: verbal, communicative, difficulty in
verbalizing thoughts and following instructions, being often distracted and unwilling to do
mental or expressive activities and cooperate with the group. What is more, the boy has been
described as shy, lacking in self-confidence, able to withdraw easily and having difficulties in
presenting both his outputs and himself to others. You may find the comparison of raw results
achieved by the child in a table below.
Table nr 7. Comparison of raw results achieved by the child ( from an experimental group) with a significant
increase in a quality and quality of the his outputs.
Pre-test
Post-test
13
The source: own study based on the results of own research (Płóciennik, 2010)
In the pre-test phase the child chose the tasks from a box “most difficult tasks” with a
view to completing them. However, in the post-test he picked a set of tasks from a box “more
difficult tasks”. When thinking up the titles for a picture, the boy came up with one title both in
the pre-test and post-test (in the pre-test: in a descriptive form, in the post test: in a concise
form). As for creating the titles for a story, he gave one title in the pre-test and two in the post-
test, both in a concise form. While building a picture story, in the pre-test the boy put all the
pictures together with one mistake (putting the third picture as the last one), but he was able to
combine only two pictures logically. However, in the post-test he did not put the pictures
correctly and did not want to say what was happening in them. When completing the pictures,
in the pre-test he added only four elements in a very simple and schematic way not using the
whole space on the paper. In the post-test, despite the fact that the tests were held in April, the
boy used the basic elements to build a Christmas tree with presents adding only 5 extra
elements. As for giving epithets for the provided object, both in the pre-test and post-test he
came up with only one correct term, however, in a “rhyming task” he was not able to think of
any rhymes. As for finding similar patterns in the pictures, in the pre-test he managed to put
one pair together and one set of five pictures. When looking at the pictures he paid attention to
more distant similarities (“the stripes”). Nevertheless, in the post-test he put together four two-
element rows and one four-element row belonging to two different categories.
When transforming and specifying geometrical figures in the pre-test the boy drew four
objects on the basis of a circle belonging do class one (“the vehicles”), all four vehicles being
drawn on the basis of two or more circles. The boy did not colour his pictures. However, in the
post-test he created 15 objects based on a rhomb belonging to eleven different groups of
objects. All the pictures contained many details, were accurately finished and beautifully
coloured. In the pre-test the boy justified his highest note for the tasks suggested by a tester
saying “because it was nice to draw something”. In the post-test he also rated the suggested
tasks highly and admitted “because I had many ideas and felt like drawing”. In the pre-test the
group of the variables
raw results of
a child
avarage results
of a group
raw results of
a child
general abilities
9
9,74
10
14,3
task commitment
15
12,5
16
13,1
creative skills
18
(including 4
original ideas)
22
(with average
7.5)
47
(including 12
original ideas)
32,5
(with average
14.0)
14
boy went back to the transformations (task 8) but he did not add any elements. However, in the
post-test he used additional time when completing the picture.
The
disproportion
between the quality of the painted pictures and created titles
was
also
noticed by a competent jury. A table below presents the comparison of the jurors’ grades given
for the boy’s output in the pre-test and post-test phase.
Table nr 8. Comparison of the grades given for the output of the child (from an experimental group) with a
significant increase in quantity and quality of the output.
The Source: own study based on overall results of own research (Płóciennik, 2010)
Although his manual skills have improved significantly, they were not specified as the
indicator of “general abilities” but as a variable of elaboration in “creative skills”.
Nevertheless, the most outstanding abilities may be noticed in making transformations and
working out the base object, in this case geometric figures. This task was highly scored in the
post-test and received average grades in the pre-test. The competent jurors gave it good grades
both in the pre-test and post-test. I have also observed that the boy had more difficulties in
expressing his thoughts graphically rather than verbally.
* * *
My research confirmed the role of the individual experience, education and culture in
cognitive development. It also proved the thesis that the development and identification of
potential creativity is relatively easy if you use heuristic techniques, ask questions, stimulate
curiosity, and make associations. The child’s mind was stimulated by transformation of ideas
and images, handling issues from different perspectives, playing with ideas, information, and
inventing new and unusual things. As a result it improved and developed during the course of
experimental activities, especially in the capacity to perceive relationships, understand the
hidden meanings, reason with the use of inductive, deductive and divergent thinking.
the output
1 juror
2 juror
3 juror
4 juror
Pre-test Post-test Pre-test Post-test Pre-test Post-test Pre-test
Post-
test
the title of the
picture
0,25
0,5
1
1,5
0,25
1
0,25
1,25
the title of the story
0,5
0,63
1,25
1,5
0,75
1,13
0,5
1,75
transformations
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
elaboration
0
0
0,75
1,25
0,25
1
0
0,75
15
Bibliography:
1. Dobrołowicz W., Psychodydaktyka kreatywności, WSiP, Warszawa 1995.
2. Dyrda B., Zjawiska niepowodzeń szkolnych uczniów zdolnych. Rozpoznawanie i
przeciwdziałanie, Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”, Kraków 2007.
3. Dyrda B., Syndrom nieadekwatnych osiągnięć jako niepowodzenie szkolne uczniów
zdolnych. Diagnoza i terapia, Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”, Kraków 2000.
4. Ekiert-Grabowska D., Syndrom Nieadekwatnych Osiągnięć Szkolnych, „Życie Szkoły”,
1994, Nr 3.
5. Karpińska A., Niepowodzenia szkolne jako kategoria edukacyjnego dialogu [in:] A.
Karpińska (eds.), Edukacja w dialogu i reformie, Wyd. Trans Humana, Białystok 2002.
6. Karwowski M. (eds.), Identyfikacja potencjału twórczego. Teoria – metodologia -
diagnostyka, Wyd. Psychopedagogiczne Transgresje, Warszawa 2006.
7. Matczak A., Diagnoza intelektu, Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN, Warszawa
1994.
8. Młodkowski J., Aktywność wizualna człowieka, PWN, Warszawa 1998.
9. Niemierko B., Między oceną szkolną a dydaktyką. Bliżej dydaktyki, WSiP, Warszawa 2000.
10. Płóciennik E., Dobrakowska A., Zabawy z wyobraźnią. Scenariusze i obrazki o charakterze
dynamicznym rozwijające wyobraźnię i myślenie twórcze dzieci w wieku przedszkolnym i
wczesnoszkolnym, Wydawnictwo AHE, Łódź 2009.
11. Płóciennik E., Stymulowanie zdolności twórczych dziecka. Weryfikacja techniki obrazków
dynamicznych, Wydawnictwo UŁ, Łódź 2010.
12. Rimm S., Bariery szkolnej kariery. Dlaczego dzieci zdolne mają słabe stopnie?, WSiP,
Warszawa 1994.
13. Szmidt K.J., Teoretyczne i metodyczne podstawy rozwijania zdolności myślenia pytajnego
[in:] W. Limont i J. Cieślikowska (eds.) Dylematy edukacji artystycznej, tom II, Oficyna
Wydawnicza „Impuls”, Kraków 2006.
14. Szmidt K.J., Pedagogika twórczości, GWP, Gdańsk 2007.
15. Szmidt K.J., Trening kreatywności. Podręcznik dla pedagogów, psychologów i trenerów
grupowych, Wydawnictwo Helion, Gliwice 2008.
16. Szuman S., Jak dzieci oglądają obrazki i co one im dają, „Przedszkole” 1936/1937, nr 4/5.
17. Szuman S., Ilustracja w książkach dla dzieci i młodzieży, Wiedza- Zawód-Kultura. Tadeusz
Zapiór, Kraków 1951.
18. Wiechnik R., Intelektualne uwarunkowania powodzenia w nauce młodzieży szkolnej w
wieku 12-18 lat w świetle badań empirycznych [in:] S. Popek (eds.) Z badań nad
zdolnościami i uzdolnieniami specjalnymi młodzieży, Wydawnictwo UMSC, Lublin 1987.