background image

FIDE Surveys – Vladimir Grabinsky 

      

 

Vladimir Grabinsky: 
 
Garry Kasparov's patent for 
prophylactic move in attack 
 

 
"If you look at Kasparov's games, you will 
notice that before a decisive assault he often 
prophylactically improves the position of his 
king. Remember the 16th game of his return 
match with Karpov (1986), which he won 
with a brilliant attack in the Ruy Lopez. It 
was a very complicated position, he had 
sacrificed something,but at some point he 
made a prophylactic move, safeguarding his 
king, and later this proved to be simply a 
winning continuation. "  
Artur Yusupov 
 
Kasparov : Karpov 
Leningrad (16) 1986 

XIIIIIIIIY 
9-tr-+-vlk+0 
9+-+-+p+-0 
9lwq-+-+pzp0 
9+-snP+-+-0 
9-+p+-+N+0 
9sN-+n+-tRP0 
9-zP-+-zPP+0 
9+LvLQ+-mK-0 
xiiiiiiiiy 

28.Bh6!  
White rightly chose to capture with the 
bishop on h6. The knight is needed more 
than the bishop for attack. If 28.Nh6? Bh6 
29.Bh6 Qb2 30.Bd3 cd3 White would get 
nothing. 
28...Qb2 29.Qf3! Nd7 
Taking the Knight 29...Qa3 30.Nf6 Kh8 
31.Qh5!? leads to nice perpetual check 
31...Rb1 32.Bc1 Kg7 33.Ne8 Kg8 34.Nf6; 

And after 29...Rb6 the best move for White 
is 30.Kh2! of course. You don't think it's all 
rigged. All the proving variations could be 
found in Kasparov's book. 
30.Bf8 Kf8  

XIIIIIIIIY 
9-tr-+-mk-+0 
9+-+n+p+-0 
9l+-+-+p+0 
9+-+P+-+-0 
9-+p+-+N+0 
9sN-+n+QtRP0 
9-wq-+-zPP+0 
9+L+-+-mK-0 
xiiiiiiiiy 

31.Kh2! 
»This important prophylactic move is one 
which has occurred in many branches of this 
game (cf. above). The king must be moved 
off the weakened back rank, after which 
White is fully ready to begin his offensive.« 
Kasparov 
31...Rb3! 32.Bd3! cd3?! 33.Qf4 Qa3?  
The only move to keep balance was 33...d2! 
34.Nh6 Qe7 35.Rg6 Qe5  
Seemingly White's king position allowed 
Black to achieve life-saving exchanges, but 
... 
36.Rg8 Ke7 

XIIIIIIIIY 
9-+-+-+R+0 
9+-+nmkp+-0 
9l+-+-+-sN0 
9+-+Pwq-+-0 
9-+-+-wQ-+0 
9+r+p+-+P0 
9-+-+-zPPmK0 
9+-+-+-+-0 
xiiiiiiiiy

 

37.d6!  

background image

FIDE Surveys – Vladimir Grabinsky 

      

 

This small pawn decides the game. 
37...Ke6 38.Re8 Kd5 39.Re5 Ne5 40.d7 
Rb8 41.Nf7 1:0. 
 
Let’s see one more game of Garry Kasparov, 
where same scenario repeated. His opponent 
was Anatoly Karpov. Again Ruy Lopez was 
played. Kasparov started king attack, the 
highlight of which was prophylactic king 
move timely made. 
 
“Only the chess player who can do  
prophylaxis moves in the heat of attack,                               
could be called an attacker of extra class.” 

 

Kasparov : Karpov 
Lyon (20), 1990 

XIIIIIIIIY 
9r+-+qvl-mk0 
9+l+-+-zp-0 
9p+-zpr+-zp0 
9+-+n+-+-0 
9Psnp+N+N+0 
9+-+-+-tRP0 
9-vL-+-zPP+0 
9+L+QtR-mK-0 
xiiiiiiiiy 

26.Nh6!  
“From this moment on I carried out a 
sustained attack. Moreover, I played very 
quickly - for some reason I had not a shadow 
of doubt about the correctness of White's 
attacking construction.” was written in Garry 
Kasparov on Modern Chess, Part 2: 
Kasparov Vs Karpov 1975–1985. 
26...c3 
After 26...Rh6 the game is quickly finished 
by 27.Nd6! Qd7 (or 27...Qh5 28.Rg5! Qd1 
29.Nf7 Kg8 30.Nh6 Kh8 31.Rd1 c3 32.Nf7 
Kg8 33.Bg6! cb2? 34.Rh5 with mate) 
28.Qg4! Qg4 29.Nf7 Kg8 30.Nh6 gh6 
31.Rg4 Kf7 32.Bg6 Kg8 33.Bf5 Kf7 34.Be6 

Ke8 35.Bd5. Karpov planned to grasp an 
initiative with the move 26...с3, but he 
missed the following Kasparov's move: 
27.Nf5!  
One of two possible winning continuations. 
Needless to say, the other winning move is 
27.Kh2. I can't believe that there is time for 
it in such sharp position! 
27...cb2 28.Qg4! Bc8 
White's got tremendous domination, Black 
could be saved by nothing else but miracle. 
What's amazing and entertaining same time 
that Garry Kasparov refutes all Black's 
attempts with help of prophylaxis 29.Kh2 in 
his book. 
28...g6 29.Kh2! Qd7 30.Nh4!;  
28...Rc8 29.Kh2! Qg6 30.Ng5;  
28...Qd7 29.Kh2! Rh6 30.Nh6 Qg4 31.Nf7 
Kg8 32.Rg4 (if 32...Kf7 33.Ng5 with mate). 
29.Qh4 Rh6  
In the event of 29...Kg8 again 30.Kh2 is 
decisive - Black is in a kind of zugzwang; 
for example: 30...Ra7 31.Ned6 Bd6 
32.Nd6+– . 
30.Nh6 gh6 

XIIIIIIIIY 
9r+l+qvl-mk0 
9+-+-+-+-0 
9p+-zp-+-zp0 
9+-+n+-+-0 
9Psn-+N+-wQ0 
9+-+-+-tRP0 
9-zp-+-zPP+0 
9+L+-tR-mK-0 
xiiiiiiiiy 

31.Kh2! 
“My patent prophylactic move in the Ruy 
Lopez.. Now the Knight on e4 can attack, as 
rook is no more lost with check!" Kasparov. 
31...Qe5 
Mating motifs have appeared: 31...Bg7 
32.Nd6 Qe1 33.Qh6! Bh6 34.Nf7#. 
32.Ng5 Qf6 33.Re8 Bf5 34.Qh6! 

background image

FIDE Surveys – Vladimir Grabinsky 

      

 

There were other ways too, but surely, 
Kasparov chose the queen sacrifice. 
34...Qh6 35.Nf7 Kh7 36.Bf5 Qg6 37.Bg6 
More elegant would be 37.Rg6! Ne7 38.Re7! 
Be7 39.Rg4#. 
37...Kg7 38.Ra8 Be7 39.Rb8 a5 40.Be4 Kf7 
41.Bd5 1:0. 
 
Undoubtedly, prophylactic moves in attack 
occur not only in Ruy Lopez and not only in 
Kasparov games. I have an advice for those 
who want to learn themselves or teach their 
students of basic ideas how to lead an attack 
or do mates in scheveningen as White. You 
should necessarily see 2 wins of Emil 
Sutovsky from Tilburg tournament in 1996. 
They were played in an exemplary manner. 
g4, g5, queen goes to h5, rook is moved via 
f3 and voila. The fact that such strong 
opponents as Van Welly and Judit Polgar 
were defeated in 22 and 24 moves is part of 
the charm. Here is the example how Judit 
Polgar was crushed. 
 
Sutovsky : J. Polgar, Tilburg 1996 
 
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cd4 4.Nd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 
a6 6.Be2 e6 7.f4 Be7 8.Be3 0–0 9.0–0 Qc7 
10.g4!?  

XIIIIIIIIY 
9rsnl+-trk+0 
9+pwq-vlpzpp0 
9p+-zppsn-+0 
9+-+-+-+-0 
9-+-sNPzPP+0 
9+-sN-vL-+-0 
9PzPP+L+-zP0 
9tR-+Q+RmK-0 
xiiiiiiiiy 
 

According to megabase the first one to dare 

playing g4 in this position was Shatashvili 
and he crushed not an ordinary opponent but 
young Tigran Petrosian in 18 moves! 

10.g4 Nc6 11.g5 Ne8 12.f5 Ne5 13.Bg4 Ng4 
14.Qg4 Qc4 15.f6 Bd8 16.Qh4 g6 17.Qh6 e5 
18.Nd5 1:0, Shatashvili : Petrosian, Tbilisi  
1945. 
10...Nc6!? 
Two rounds earlier Van Wely was defeated 
by Sutovsky in 24 moves after 10...b5?! 
11.g5 Nfd7 12.Bd3! Re8 13.Qh5 g6 14.Qh4 
b4 15.Nce2 Bb7? 16.Rf3+–, Sutovskij : Van 
Wely, Tilburg 1996.  
Anand defended wrongly in this position: 
10...Re8?! 11.g5 Nfd7 12.Bd3 Nc6 13.Qh5 
g6 14.Qh4 Bf8 15.Rf3, led to furious attack 
which resulted in victory of Garry Kasparov 
(1:0, Kasparov : Anand, Moscow 1996).  
The best reaction on wing attack is banal 
counter strike in center 10...d5! 11.ed5 
(11.e5 Ne4) 11...Nd5 12.Nd5 ed5 13.Bf3 
Nc6, with balanced position, Black 
eventually even won in the game Fedorchuk 
: Navara, Bol 2014. 
11.g5 Nd7 12.f5 Nde5?!  
It isn't probably the best defense despite the 
fact that Spassky played this move in his 
game against Kholmov in 1964. We'll see 
more appropriate capture on d4 in the next 
game. 
13.f6 Bd8 14.Bd3  
The Bishop opens way for Queen to h5. 
14...Nd4 
Better was 14...gf6 15.gf6 Kh8 16.Bh6 Rg8 
17.Bg7 Rg7 18.fg7 Kg7 with compensation. 
15.Bd4 Qa5?  
Judit made this move too quickly being 
certain in her opening preparation. The move 
she had analyzed at home is the decisive 
mistake by the way. Though it's difficult to 
imagine for young chess players, but such 
things happened. At that time computer 
didn't verify the quality of analysis and home 
preparation. 
16.fg7 Kg7 
 

 

 

background image

FIDE Surveys – Vladimir Grabinsky 

      

 

XIIIIIIIIY 
9r+lvl-tr-+0 
9+p+-+pmkp0 
9p+-zpp+-+0 
9wq-+-sn-zP-0 
9-+-vLP+-+0 
9+-sNL+-+-0 
9PzPP+-+-zP0 
9tR-+Q+RmK-0 
xiiiiiiiiy 

Now try yourself to find the only move 
leading to irresistible attack. 
17.Kh1!! 
This blissful prophylactic move is winning 
mathematically! Black has prepared the 
exchange of dark squared bishops with Bb6, 
but White is ready to trade his Bishop d4 
only to the knight e5. 
17.Qh5? Would be premature. This is the 
move Polgar expected in her home analysis. 
17...Bb6! 18.Bb6 Qb6 19.Kh1 Rg8! 20.Rf4 
Kh8∞. 
17...Bb6  
The time for good advices has passed. Any 
other move loses here too. 
18.Be5 Qe5 19.Qh5  
White's plan is to attack directly, for 
example Rf6, Raf1, Qh6 and finally g5–g6. 
19...Be3 20.Rf3 Bg5 21.Rg1 f6 22.h4 1:0. 
 
Victories of Emil Sutovsky were excellent 
material to study. Andrei Volokitin and me 
worked out through his games to learn 
standard ways of attack in scheveningen. 
After few months only this work brought 
results. In the open tournament 11 year old 
junior, who played chess for 2 years only, 
was paired with 62 year old master Victor 
Zheliandinov, long term coach of Vassily 
Ivanchuk and member of Karpov team. 
What was really special about it for me - that 
this game was an exam of my student Andrei 
to my coach Viktor. 

Volokitin : Zheliandinov, Lviv 1997 
 
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cd4 4.Nd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 
d6 6.Be2 Be7 7.0–0 0–0 8.f4 a6 9.Be3 Qc7 
10.g4 Nc6 11.g5 Nd7 12.f5 
Andrei Volokitin was armed with theory 
knowledge here, but Zheliandinov had to 
solve his problems over the board. 
12...Nd4 
Not accidentally Zheliandinov made draws 
with such legends as Karpov,Tal, 
Polugaevsky, Geller. His active play style 
and life optimism often bailed him out. His 
ability to find counter play helped the master 
in this game too. At least his way of defence 
is estimated more optimistically by computer 
than the one Judit Polgar chose in our 
previous game. 
13.Qd4 

XIIIIIIIIY 
9r+l+-trk+0 
9+pwqnvlpzpp0 
9p+-zpp+-+0 
9+-+-+PzP-0 
9-+-wQP+-+0 
9+-sN-vL-+-0 
9PzPP+L+-zP0 
9tR-+-+RmK-0 
xiiiiiiiiy 

13...Qd8! 
It's very difficult psychologically to make 
such backward move. But that is the best 
chance for Black! 
14.Kh1! 
This quiet move is the strongest continuation 
of attack! Such moves made during king 
attack is prove of 11 year boy talent. 
14...Ne5? 
Black should have taken g5 pawn 14...Bg5! 
15.Bg5 Qg5 16.fe6 fe6 17.Qd6 and despite 
White's initiative position is playable 
15.f6! 
There is no escape now! 

background image

FIDE Surveys – Vladimir Grabinsky 

      

 

15...gf6 16.gf6 Bf6 17.Rf6! Qf6 18.Rg1 
Kh8 19.Bg5 Qg7 20.Be7 Qh6 
20...Ng6 21.Bf6+–. 

XIIIIIIIIY 
9r+l+-tr-mk0 
9+p+-vLp+p0 
9p+-zpp+-wq0 
9+-+-sn-+-0 
9-+-wQP+-+0 
9+-sN-+-+-0 
9PzPP+L+-zP0 
9+-+-+-tRK0 
xiiiiiiiiy 

21.Qe3! 
Queen sacrifice is decent ending for this 
crashing attack. What's interesting that after 
6 years absolutely identical game was played 
not far from Lviv, in the Poland youth 
championship U18, between Gajewski and 

 

Czakon (Krynica 2003). 1:0. 
 
Spraggett : Spassky, Montpellier 1985 

XIIIIIIIIY 
9-+r+-+k+0 
9zp-+l+-+p0 
9-zp-+ptR-+0 
9+-wqpzP-+-0 
9-+-sN-wQ-+0 
9zP-+-+-+-0 
9-zP-+-+rzP0 
9+K+-+R+-0 
xiiiiiiiiy 

No one else would comment the point of the 
following game better than did Kevin 
Spraggett who played it as White: "White 
has a clear advantage but the former world 
champion is defending very resourcefully. 
White was intending to play 32.Rf7 followed 

by Qh6 with a mating setup, but at the last 
moment he realized that Spassky has 
32…Rb2!, with a perpetual check! I could 
have defended against this with 32.Qf3!?, 
but after 32…Rb2 anyway.  33.Kb2 Dd4 and 
after 34…Qe4 Black could force an ending 
where White’s win is not so guaranteed. I 
felt that White deserved better! I used up 10 
minutes of my remaining 15 minutes and 
finally found the solution. … one that I am 
very proud of!" 
32.Ka1!! 
It's simply amazing how prophylactic move 
could be the strongest continuation in such 
sharp position. 
32.Rf7 Rb2!=;  
32.b4 Rb2! 33.Ka1 Ra2!=;  
32.Qf3 Rb2 33.Kb2 Qd4 34.Kb1 Qe4 
35.Qe4 de4. 
32...Rb2 
Otherwise White will proceed Rf7 and Qh6. 
33.Qg3!! Kh8 

XIIIIIIIIY 
9-+r+-+-mk0 
9zp-+l+-+p0 
9-zp-+ptR-+0 
9+-wqpzP-+-0 
9-+-sN-+-+0 
9zP-+-+-wQ-0 
9-tr-+-+-zP0 
9mK-+-+R+-0 
xiiiiiiiiy 

34.Rf7! 
34.Rg1? Rg2!! 
34...Rg2 35.Rh7! Kh7 36.Rf7 Kh6 37.Rf6 
Kh7 38.Qh3 Kg7 39.Qg2 Kh7 40.Qg6 Kh8 
1:0. 
 

 

background image

FIDE Surveys – Vladimir Grabinsky 

      

 

Alekhine : Euwe, Wch (16) 1937 

XIIIIIIIIY 
9-+-+-+-+0 
9+-+-mkp+p0 
9-+-+-+p+0 
9+-+-+-+-0 
9-+-wq-sN-+0 
9+P+-+Q+P0 
9-+-tr-vlPmK0 
9+-+-+R+-0 
xiiiiiiiiy 

48.Kh1!!  
This ultra-brilliant quiet move overwhelms 
Euwe on the spot. Now 49 Ne2 is threatened. 
Immediate 48.Ne2 wouldn’t work, because 
of check 48...Qe5. 
48...Ra2? 
Max Euwe made a mistake, but it was 
extremely hard to find the right move. Even 
computer can’t help with this. The best 
chance for Euwe would be to play 48...h5!! 
Kasparov put question mark to this move in 
his book “My Great Predecessors”, which is 
absolutely unfair. The idea behind this 
strange move I revealed in the variation 
49.Ne2 Rd1 50.Qb7! (an important 
inbetween check, to take off the queen from 
bad position) 50...Kf8! 51.Nd4 Rf1 52.Kh2. 
It seems that position is clear now, but let’s 
continue: 52...Bg1 53.Kg3 Bf2 54.Kf3 Bd4 
55.Ke4 Bg1 
Finally, there appears the position, which 
was commented by Euwe: “The position 
even draws, if the bishop has to be sacrificed 
for the b-pawn.” Well, we have to give due 
to Max Euwe for finding such unexpected 
chance. But still if White gives the bishop it 
would be hard to hold the fortress. White 
will try then to push g4–g5 and create 
zugzwang threat because Black rook has 
little safe squares. Instead making draw with 
bishop and rook is much easier! All Black 
needs to do is to return his rook to 6th rank, 

controlling b6 and it’s not clear how White 
can achieve any progress in pushing his 
pawn. Computers of course will keep saying 
White is winning, but this is only extra proof 
that the theme of fortress remains 
incomprehensible for them. 
49.Ne2! Ra1 50.Qb7!  
Important in between move. Wrong is 
50.Nd4? Rf1 51.Kh2 Bg1, winning back the 
Queen. 
50...Kf6?! 51.Nd4 Rf1 52.Kh2 Bg1 53.Kg3 
Bf2 54.Kf3 Bd4 55.Ke4 Rd1  
With Qа6 threatening. 
56.Qd5?! Ke7 
Transferring into pawn endgame is also 
hopeless: 56...Re1 57.Kd4 Rd1 58.Kc5 Rd5 
59.Kd5 Ke7 60.Kc6. 
57.g4 h5 58.gh5 f5 59.Kf3 Rd3 60.Ke2 Re3 
61.Kd2 Re4 62.hg6 1:0. 
 
”At one of the sessions of our chess school for 
talented young players, grandmaster Yusupov 
remarked  that,  when  studying  Kasparov’s 
games,  he  had  noticed  a  specific  procedure 
that  was  often  employed  by  the  world 
champion.  With  an  offensive  in  full  swing, 
there  would  suddenly  follow  a  quiet  king 
move,  and  later  it  would  transpire  that  this 
move decisively strengthened the attack. On 
its  previous  square  the  king  interfered,  by 
being open to a check in certain variations”. 
Mark Dvoretsky 

XIIIIIIIIY 
9-+-+k+r+0 
9+-+-vlp+-0 
9p+-+p+-+0 
9+p+nzP-+p0 
9-+q+L+-zP0 
9+-+R+QzP-0 
9-+-vL-zPK+0 
9+-+-+-+-0 
xiiiiiiiiy 

Kasparov : Jobava, Rethymno 2003 

background image

FIDE Surveys – Vladimir Grabinsky 

      

 

Make your choice, what is better here? To 
capture on d5 either with the bishop or rook, 
or maybe some prophylaxis. Please calculate 
variations. 
41.Kh2!!  
Absolutely the best choice! If anyone chose 
41.Rd5? he should practice in finding 
opponent’s counter chances. Otherwise it’s 
hard to explain why the move 41...Rg4! was 
missed. 
Taking with the bishop is more promising, 
than the rook capture. 41.Bd5!? ed5, and if 
you found the move 42.Re3!, you’ll be 
pleased to know that Kasparov didn’t even 
consider this strong move. (Garry studied 
42.Rd5 Qg4 where big fighting is ahead). 
41...b4 
41...Rg4 42.Bd5 ed5 43.Rc3 Qe4. Now it 
became obvious that absence of king on g2 
allows to avoid queens exchange and 
continue White’s attack 44.Rc8 Kd7 45.Qc3 
d4 46.Qc7 Ke6 47.Re8+–. 
42.Bd5 ed5 43.Rd5 Rg6  
43...b3 44.Rd3. 
44.Rd3! Rc6 

XIIIIIIIIY 
9-+-+k+-+0 
9+-+-vlp+-0 
9p+r+-+-+0 
9+-+-zP-+p0 
9-zpq+-+-zP0 
9+-+R+QzP-0 
9-+-vL-zP-mK0 
9+-+-+-+-0 
xiiiiiiiiy 

45.e6! Qe6 46.Re3 Qc4? 
Losing is 46...Qf6? 47.Re7!, but after 
46...Qd7! White would have to find some 
more difficult moves: 47.Bb4 Re6 48.Rb3! 
Qc6 49.Qh5 Bb4 50.Rb4 Re1 51.Rb8 Ke7 
52.Qg5 Ke6 53.Qg4 Kf6 54.Qf4 Ke6 
55.Kh3!+–. 

47.Bb4 Re6 48.Be7 Ke7 49.Rc3!+– Qg4 
50.Rc7 Kd6 51.Qc6 Ke5 52.Qc3 Kd5 1:0. 
 
You may also find more interesting 
examples on this theme in School of Chess 
Excellence 2: Tactical Play: Mark Dvoretsky 
Chapter “Don’t let the King interfere!”