Tabunshchyk Hamilton Jakobi Method 4 Classical Mechanics in Grassmann Algebra (1999) [sharethefiles com]

background image

arXiv:math-ph/9911001 v1 2 Nov 1999

Hamilton-Jakobi method for classical mechanics in

Grassmann algebra

Kyrylo V. Tabunshchyk

Institute for Condensed Matter Physics

of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,

1 Svientsitskii St., 79011 Lviv, Ukraine

Abstract

We present the Hamilton-Jakobi method for the classical mechanics with constrains in

Grassmann algebra. In the frame of this method the solution for the classical system char-
acterized by the SUSY Lagrangian is obtained.

Key words: Hamilton-Jakobi method, SUSY system, classical mechanics, constrains.
PACS number(s): 03.20, 11.30.P

The problem of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics with Grassmann variables has been

discussed previously in works [1, 2, 3] and an examples of solutions for classical systems were
presented.

In this paper we propose the Hamilton-Jakobi method for the solution of the classical coun-

terpart of Witten‘s model [4].

We assume that the states of mechanical system are described by the set of ordinary bosonic

degrees of freedom q (even Grassmann numbers) and the set of fermionic degrees of freedom ψ
(odd Grassmann numbers).

The Hamilton-Jakobi equation in the case of the classical mechanics with constrains in Grass-

mann algebra is following:

∂S

∂t

= −H

q, ψ,

∂S

∂q

,

∂S
∂ψ

, λ(q, ψ,

∂S

∂q

,

∂S
∂ψ

), λ

α

, t

.

(1)

Here, λ is the set of certain Lagrange multipliers for the constrains which can be found from the
equations of motion and from the time-independence conditions. On the other hand, λ

α

are those

multipliers which cannot be found and which form a functional arbitration for solutions (in the
theory with the first-class constrains [5, 6, 7]). However, we can transform the theory with the
first-class constrains to the physically equivalent theory with the second-class constrains. As an
example, we can take the strong minimal gauge which does not shift the equations of motion (the
so-called canonical gauge G

(c)

[8]).

Jakobi theorem.

Let us consider a full solution of the Hamilton-Jakobi equation S=S

r

(q, ψ, α, β, t) (α is a

set of the even Grassmann constants, β is a set of the odd ones). We perform the canonical
transformation from the old variables q, ψ, P

q

, P

ψ

to the new ones (taking S

r

as a generating

function) and put α = P

Q

, β = P

ν

as a new canonical momenta and Q, ν as a new coordinates.

Then the relations between the new and old variables can be written in the form:

H

0

= H +

∂S

r

∂t

,

P

q

=

∂S

r

∂q

,

P

ψ

=

∂S

r

∂ψ

,

Q =

∂S

r

∂P

Q

,

ν = −

∂S

r

∂P

ν

.

1

background image

Since S

r

is the solution of the Hamilton-Jakobi equation, we obtain that

H

0

= 0

=⇒

P

Q

= const,

Q = const,

P

ν

= const,

ν = const,

new coordinates are constant. From the obtained result we can write:

∂S

r

/∂α = const (even Grassmann number),

(2)

∂S

r

/∂β = const (odd Grassmann number).

The solution of the equations (2) gives the variables q and ψ as functions of time. Time depen-
dencies of the canonical momenta can be found from the relations P

ψ

= ∂S/∂ψ, P

q

= ∂S/∂q.

Let us now consider the Lagrangian [1, 2]

L =

˙q

2

2

1
2

V

2

(q) −

i

2

( ˙¯

ψψ − ¯

ψ ˙

ψ) − U(q) ¯

ψψ.

(3)

which possess supersymmetry when U(q) = V

0

(q) (in this case the real function V is the so-called

superpotential) [4]. The overbar denotes the Grassmann variant of the complex conjugation.

The momenta conjugate to the fermionic variables do not depend on ˙

ψ or ˙¯

ψ. Hence, we have

the following constrains between coordinates and momenta:

F

1

= P

ψ

+

i

2

¯

ψ,

F

2

= P

¯

ψ

+

i

2

ψ.

(4)

The Lagrange multipliers can be found from the following time-independence conditions:

˙

F

1

= {H(λ) , F

1

} = 0,

˙

F

2

= {H(λ) , F

2

} = 0,

(5)

where

H(λ) =

P

2

q

2

+

1
2

V

2

(q) + U(q) ¯

ψψ + λ

1

(P

ψ

+

i

2

¯

ψ) + λ

2

(P

¯

ψ

+

i

2

ψ).

(6)

Since the Hamiltonian of the system (3) is following:

H = H(λ(q, ψ, ¯

ψ)) =

P

2

q

2

+

1
2

V

2

(q) − iU(q)P

¯

ψ

¯

ψ + iU(q)P

ψ

ψ.

(7)

Starting from the obtained Hamiltonian (7), the Hamilton-Jakobi equation (1) can be written in
the form:

∂S

∂t

+

1
2

∂S

∂q

!

2

+

1
2

V

2

(q) − iU(q)

∂S
∂ ¯

ψ

¯

ψ + iU(q)

∂S
∂ψ

ψ = 0.

(8)

Let us make an ansatz for the action

S(t, q, ψ, ¯

ψ) = S

0

(t, q) + ψ ¯

ψS

1

(t, q) + ψS

2

(t, q) + ¯

ψS

3

(t, q),

(9)

2

background image

where S

0

and S

1

are even Grassmann functions and S

2

and S

3

are the odd ones. After the

substitution of ansatz (9) into the equation (8) and decomposition of this equation on Grassmann
parities we obtain the next system of equations:

∂S

0

∂t

+

1
2

∂S

0

∂q

!

2

+

1
2

V

2

(q) = 0,

∂S

2

∂t

+

∂S

0

∂q

∂S

2

∂q

− iU(q)S

2

= 0,

∂S

3

∂t

+

∂S

0

∂q

∂S

3

∂q

+ iU(q)S

3

= 0,

(10)

∂S

1

∂t

+

∂S

0

∂q

∂S

1

∂q

= 0,

∂S

2

∂q

∂S

3

∂q

ψ ¯

ψ = 0.

The first equation can be integrated by the variable decomposition method. Thus, we obtain

S

0

=

Z

q

2E − V

2

(q) dq − Et,

(11)

where E is the constant of integration. Starting from the expression (11), for the fourth equation
we obtain the following:

S

1

=

Z

A dq

q

2E − V

2

(q)

− At.

(12)

Here, A and E are real variables.

The solutions of the second and third equations can be written as

S

2

= φ

1

Z

dq

q

2E − V

2

(q)

− t

!

exp

i

Z

U(q) dq

q

2E − V

2

(q)

!

,

(13)

S

3

= φ

2

Z

dq

q

2E − V

2

(q)

− t

!

exp

− i

Z

U(q) dq

q

2E − V

2

(q)

!

,

where φ

1

and φ

2

are arbitrary odd Grassmann functions. In our case, it is sufficient to take

φ

1

= const, φ

2

= const. The last equation from (10) leads to some condition on functions φ

1

and

φ

2

, which is satisfied when they are constant.

Thus, we can present the action in the following form:

S =

Z

q

2E − V

2

(q) dq − Et +

Z

A dq

q

2E − V

2

(q)

ψ ¯

ψ − Atψ ¯

ψ

(14)

+ ψφ

1

Z

dq

q

2E − V

2

(q)

− t

!

exp

i

Z

U(q) dq

q

2E − V

2

(q)

!

+

¯

ψφ

2

Z

dq

q

2E − V

2

(q)

− t

!

exp

− i

Z

U(q) dq

q

2E − V

2

(q)

!

.

3

background image

Using the Jakobi theorem (2)

∂S/∂φ

1

= const,

∂S/∂φ

2

= const,

we obtain solutions for the odd Grassmann variables:

ψ = ψ

0

exp(−i

Z

U(q(τ )) dτ ),

¯

ψ = ¯

ψ

0

exp(i

Z

U(q(τ )) dτ ).

(15)

Let us introduce the following series for the even Grassmann variable:

q(t) = x

qc

(t) + q

0

(t) ¯

ψψ = x

qc

(t) + q

0

(t) ¯

ψ

0

ψ

0

.

(16)

Then, from the Jakobi theorem we have:

∂S

∂A

=

Z

dq

q

2E − V

2

(q)

¯

ψ

0

ψ

0

− t ¯

ψ

0

ψ

0

= const.

(17)

From (16) and (17) we can write

Z

dx

qc

q

2E − V

2

(x

qc

)

− t = const.

(18)

Let us now evaluating the derivative ∂S/∂E = const. Taking into account the result (18) and the
following expansions

U(q) = U(x

qc

) + U

0

(x

qc

)q

0

¯

ψ

0

ψ

0

,

V

2

(q) = V

2

(x

qc

) + 2V

0

(x

qc

)V (x

qc

)q

0

¯

ψ

0

ψ

0

,

(19)

f (V

2

(q)) = f (V

2

(x

qc

)) + f

0

(V

2

(x

qc

))2V

0

(x

qc

)V (x

qc

)q

0

¯

ψ

0

ψ

0

,

we obtain:

Z

dq

0

q

2E − V

2

(x

qc

)

=

Z

[A − U(x

qc

(τ )) − V (x

qc

(τ ))V

0

(x

qc

(τ ))q

0

(τ )]

2E − V

2

(x

qc

(τ ))

dτ.

(20)

This result can be presented in the form:

q

0

(t) =

˙x

qc

(t)

˙x

qc

(0)

q

0

(0) −

t

Z

0

F − U(x

qc

(τ ))

2E − V

2

(x

qc

(τ ))

.

(21)

The obtained result coincides with the result obtained from the Lagrangian equations of motion
[1].

Thus the Hamilton-Jakobi equation and Jakobi theorem are presented in Grassmann algebra.

The action for the classical system characterized by the SUSY Lagrangian is presented in the
explicit form. The results obtained using the Hamilton-Jakobi method coincide with ones obtained
previously from the Lagrangian equations of motion.

Acknowledgements.
I am very grateful to V.M.Tkachuk for comments and discusions.

4

background image

References

[1] A. Inomata, G. Junker, Phys. Rev. A 50, 3638 (1994).

[2] G. Junker, M. Stephan, J. Phys A 28,1467 (1995).

[3] A. Inomata, G. Junker, S. Matthiesen, Hep-th – 9510230 (1995).

[4] E. Witten, Nucl.Phys. B188, 513 (1981).

[5] R. Hojman, J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3825 (1987).

[6] P. A. M. Dirac, Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. (Belfer Graduate school of Science, Yeshiva

Univ., New York 1964).

[7] E.S. Fradkin, I.V. Tyutin, Phys. Rev. D 2, 2841 (1970).

[8] Gitman D.M. and Tyutin I.V. 1986 (Moscow: Nauka Press).

[9] V.P. Akulov, S. Duplij, Hep-th – 9809089 (1998).

Tabunshchyk K.V. e-mail: tkir@icmp.lviv.ua

5


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
Soroka Linear Odd Poisson Bracket on Grassmann Algebra (2000) [sharethefiles com]
Rosu Classical Mechanics [Los Alamos Archives 1999] 4AH
Doran Grassmann Mechanics Multivector Derivatives & GA (1992) [sharethefiles com]
Elkies Combinatorial game Theory in Chess Endgames (1996) [sharethefiles com]
Lasenby et al 2 spinors, Twistors & Supersymm in the Spacetime Algebra (1992) [sharethefiles com]
Lasenby GA a Framework 4 Computing Invariants in Computer Vision (1996) [sharethefiles com]
Ivashchuk Infinite dimensional Grassmann Banach Algebras (2000) [sharethefiles com]
Burstall Harmonic Tori in Lie Groups (1991) [sharethefiles com]
Advanced Mechanics in Robotic Systems (Springer 2011 Ed1)
Mathematics A Few Classic Unknowns in Mathematics HILIYHAT6SLV7U3R55HOM2JZQKJQEBFV4LMRXCQ
Formation of a new chromosomes as a virulence mechanism in C glabrata
Advanced Mechanics in Robotic Systems (Springer 2011 Ed1)
Reece, CLASSICAL QUOTATIONS IN THE WORKS OF RATllERIUS
Strengthening mechanisms in Ti
Rajeev S G Advanced classical mechanics chaos (Rochester lecture notes, web draft, 2002)(100s) PCtm
Rosu H Classical Mechanics a graduate course (arXiv physics 9909035, 1999)(131s) PCtm
Swami Omkarananda Methoden der Gotterfahrung in der Bibel
Domjan M , Cusato B Pavlovian feed forward mechanisms in the control of social behavior
Baez J , Smith B , Wise D Lectures on classical mechanics (web draft, 2005)(76s) PCtm

więcej podobnych podstron