When a PC takes responsibility for withholding from the auditor, he locks himself straight into the mechanics of 3GA. The ARC break that results from such an action on the part of the PC is the sort on which the bank is built and may be too heavy to be handled by ruds. That is the button that makes 3GA what it is. It is based on the mechanics of taking full responsibility, in a limited way, for one purpose. There is no pan-determinism here. The person dedicates himself to the goal of the GPM as a prime postulate. Doing anything else is Dev-T for the PC. This sets up a situation where everything else is an otherness. is a departure from all pan-determinism. The PC has had it, since any other action is an alter-isness of the basic purpose. Doing anything else is a breakdown of his own very isolated determinism. This is how the PC backs out of the physical universe, thereby running into it again with a thud. Thus other occurrences, besides those which fulfil the goal, are not as-ised. They are alter-ised, and mass gathers around them.
You should realize that it is a missed withhold that louses up the session. What if the PC took responsibility for never getting any withholds off? He could make such a postulate. You would then have an ARC break that no rudiments could undo. Maybe even a process couldn't undo it, since it goes straight to the heart of the GPM and keys in all those basic purposes. By this action, the PC has keyed in the highest button in the bank: withholding. Not that PC's are responsible for withholds, but they are responsible for action of one kind or another. So when the PC takes responsibility for the [highest] button in the bank, wow! If you try to run a PC on, "What withholdingness have you taken responsibility for?", he would get more somatics than he knew existed, because you are trying to run the GPM out from the topside down. It is not clear, at this time, what you could do with this situation. This is under investigation at this time.
So the final question on withholds in model session is under test. LRH is trying to find something that could undo the possibility of the PC's having postulated that he wasn't going to tell you anything or talk to you in that session. Here he has found a button in excess of all other buttons. 3GA was designed to handle this button with ease, but not to handle the above situation. Probably the reason for an occluded childhood is having taken full responsibility for not communicating, e.g. "I'll never tell you anything again! I'm mad at you!"
The likelihood of the PC's making such a postulate and hanging up the session as part of the GPM is remote, if you are following the textbook solution.
Don't let untrained auditors attempt listing or 3GA. The only danger in listing is for some untrained, unskilled auditor to try to run 3GA. They can get a PC into more trouble than you can easily get him put of. 3GA solves 3GA. If you run a 3GA wrong, you can make it right with more 3GA. It is a peculiarity of problems in this universe and in the mind, that a prime solution runs out its own errors. That is the test of a prime solution. You make an error with this solution, and it corrects the error, so therefore it is not a cure. 3GA is the first thing that is not a cure. A cure does something about a prior problem. 3GA operates on the prime postulate. It wouldn't even register as a goal if it weren't a prime postulate on some section of track, so it isn't solving anything. But it puts the person in a situation where he doesn't have to be solved. Very tricky!
The trouble with finding a wrong goal is that listing it will beef up the bank worse than any creative process ever run. You are running an alter-is, and you will get an alter-is. Mass is an alter-is, so the longer you run the wrong goal, the more mental mass you are going to get. If you suggest a goal to the PC, the misownership of it will seize it up in the GPM and cause it thereafter to read. It will be reading on misownership. like everything else in the GPM If you list it, the mass will increase and increase, and the PC will feel worse and worse.
[At this point, LRH mocks up a "World Mental Health Organization" which would inspect hospitals, etc. It would subscribe to the "International Congress of Ethics in Healing", and it would require doctors to give an account of their facilities, results, technology, credentials, etc.] The right to inspect gives the right to command. It is the first step in taking control.