FIDE Trainers Surveys 2012 09 30 Semon Palatnik Advantage of Two Bishops


19.Tad1 c4 20.Kf2 h4 21.Se2 c5 22.Sg1
Kc7 23.Sf3 Kc6 24.Se1 Le4 25.Ke2 Td2
Sam Palatnik:
26.Td2 Td8 27.Td8 Ld8 28.Sf3
XIIIIIIIIY
Advantage of Two Bishops
9-+-vl-+-+0
9zpp+-+pzp-0
If you have to rate chess teachers throughout
9-+k+-+-+0
history, GM Tarrasch would definitely come
up at the top of the list. He had a unique way
9+-zp-zP-+-0
of conducting great theoretical research and
9-+p+lzP-zp0
analysis, as well as ability to defend his
9+-zP-vLN+-0
conclusions in both theoretical discussions
9PzP-+K+PzP0
and practice. Dr. Tarrasch was a great
proponent of his ideas in practice, and was
9+-+-+-+-0
considered to be one of the greatest players
xiiiiiiiiy
in the pre-computer era. His theory on the
This becomes an interesting endgame
advantage of two bishops holds true even
position. Black, with two strong bishops, has
today. Here we showcase analysis of two
a positional advantage. However, the
chess classics, featuring the advantage of
weakness of the h4 pawn, coupled with the
two bishops. Note that the point of this
double pawns on the c-file, gives white
analysis, not so much as to show case
chances to survive. According to Dr.
individual games per se, but shed light on
Tarasch, two Bishops can give either side in
various types of positions. We provide
possession of those assets and advantage.
analysis to even dubious moves, as the
This advantage could be more then adequate
emerging positions represents a type of
compensation for the pawn inconveniences,
common situation worth studying.
such as isolated pawn, hung pawns, or
doubled pawns on the queens flank, which is
Taubenhaus : Tarrasch
what we have in this case. However, in the
Monte Carlo 1903
given eample, it is not enough to simply
Ruy Lopez C67
believe in advantage of two bishops. One has
to find a way to leverage this advantage, and
1.e4 e5 2.Sf3 Sc6 3.Lb5 Sf6 4.0 0 Se4 5.d4
correct, improve your pawn structure as well
Sd6 6.Lc6 dc6 7.de5 Sf5
as strengthen and intensify the position of
This game used the line, leading to the
one's King. In other words, one has to
Berlin Defense, was already considered old-
materialize this advantage, and then it will
fashioned. Nearly one hundred years later,
be a short sprint to the win.
this variation successfully was returned to
28...Lb1! 29.a3 Ld3 30.Ke1 Le4 31.Ke2
practice by GM Oleg Romanishin, then
Ld3 32.Ke1 Le4 33.Ke2 Ld3 34.Ke1 Kd5
served to Grandmaster Vladimir Kramnik
35.Lf2 h3
very well as he won the title of world
Another possibility would have been
champion, by beating Garry Kasparov in
35...Ke4 36.Lh4 (36.Lc5 Kf4 37.La7 h3;
2000.
36.Sg5 Kf4 37.Sf7 Le7 38.Lh4! and white
8.De2
holds) 36...Lh4 37.Sh4 Kf4.
More common here now is 8. Dd8.
36.g3?
8...Sd4 9.Sd4 Dd4 10.Sc3 Lg4 11.De3 De3
Pawn h3 - it's "the enemy of the people", and
12.Le3 Lb4 13.Se4 Lf5 14.c3 Le7 15.Sg3
under laws of wartime should be condemned
Ld3 16.Tfd1 0 0 0 17.Td2 c5 18.f4 h5
FIDE SURVEYS  Sam Palatnik 1
by tribunal to a capital punishment. White Teichmann : Bier
should have played . 36.gh3! b6 37.Lg3! Hamburg 1905
Then if (here we disagrees with the line
XIIIIIIIIY
recommended in many books, 37.Le3 and if
9-+-+-+-+0
37...Ke4 38.Kf2, planning 39.Sg5) 37...Ke4,
9+pzpkvlpzpp0
than simply 38.Sg5, while 37& Lg6, with
9p+p+-+-+0
small winning chances. Still white could
have saved the game would be followed by
9+-+-zPl+-0
38. Kd2 and finally, if black tries 37. ..f6,
9-+-+-+-+0
then 38. ef6 gf6 39. Kf2. 38.Sg5.
9+PsN-vL-+-0
36...b6 37.Sg1 Lf5 38.Sf3 Ke4 39.Sd2
9PzP-mK-zPPzP0
39.Sg5 would be followed by 39...Lg5
40.fg5 Kd3 41.Kd1 Lg4 42.Kc1 Ke2
9+-+-+-+-0
XIIIIIIIIY
xiiiiiiiiy
9-+-vl-+-+0
24.f3?
This loses a tempo. It would have been
9zp-+-+pzp-0
stronger to play 24.f4 . Even then, however,
9-zp-+-+-+0
White's position would have been difficult,
9+-zp-zPl+-0
after, for example, 24...a5! (the natural
9-+p+kzP-+0
24...Ke6 25.Ke2 a5 26.Kf3 h5 27.Se4 would
make it more difficult for Black to realize his
9zP-zP-+-zPp0
advantage, even though after 27...b6! Black's
9-zP-sN-vL-zP0
chances are still better) 28.Sg5 (28.h3 h4
9+-+-mK-+-0
29.Lf2) 28...Kd5 29.Sf7 Lb1.
xiiiiiiiiy
24...h5
39...Kd3 40.Sf1 Le4 41.Se3 Le7 The move 24...a5 is necessary in order to
Penetration of the black King on d3 says that play ...f6 next. If Black immediately plays
creation of a reliable fortress for white isn't 24...f6, then 25.ef6 Lf6 26.b4!, followed by
obviously possible any more. a3; g3; h4! and White's fortress is difficult to
42.g4 b5 43.g5 a5 44.Kd1 b4 45.cb4 cb4 breach.
46.ab4 ab4 47.Sc2 c3 48.bc3 b3 25.Ke2 Ke6 26.f4
XIIIIIIIIY XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+-+0 9-+-+-+-+0
9+-+-vlpzp-0 9+pzp-vlpzp-0
9-+-+-+-+0 9p+p+k+-+0
9+-+-zP-zP-0 9+-+-zPl+p0
9-+-+lzP-+0 9-+-+-zP-+0
9+pzPk+-+p0 9+PsN-vL-+-0
9-+N+-vL-zP0 9PzP-+K+PzP0
9+-+K+-+-0 9+-+-+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy xiiiiiiiiy
0:1. 26...g6?
Mistake. Better was 26...a5 27.Kf3 f6 28.Se4
(28.ef6 Lf6 29.Lc1 g6 30.Se4 Ld4 with the
FIDE SURVEYS  Sam Palatnik 2
next b5 and Kd5 and Black must to win - see 28...b6 29.Kc1 c6 30.Kd2 b5 31.Kc1 b4
the next diagram - 31.Sc3 b5 32.Se4 32.Se2 Le4 33.g3 Kd5 34.Kd2 c4 35.Sd4
cb3 36.Sb3 c5 37.Sc1 c4 38.Se2 c3
XIIIIIIIIY
XIIIIIIIIY
9-+-+-+-+0
9-+-+-+-+0
9+-zp-+-+-0
9+-+-vlp+-0
9-+p+k+p+0
9p+-+-+p+0
9zpp+-+l+p0
9+-+kzP-+p0
9-+-vlNzP-+0
9Pzp-+lzP-+0
9+P+-+K+-0
9+-zp-vL-zP-0
9PzP-+-+PzP0
9-zP-mKN+-zP0
9+-vL-+-+-0
9+-+-+-+-0
xiiiiiiiiy
xiiiiiiiiy
Now Black can rich the winning result by
32...Kd5 33.Sc3 (33.Sd2 Ld3 34.g3 c5 39.Sc3
35.Kg2 Le2 with the next Le3 and marching If 39.bc3, then 39...b3.
the King) 33...Lc3! (popular transfer from 39...bc3 40.Kc3 a5 0:1.
two Bishops to opposit color Bishops
endgame) 34.bc3 Lb1 35.a3 Lc2 36.b4 a4
37.Ke3 Kc4 38.Kd2 Kb3 39.g3 Lf5 40.Kd1
Ka2 41.Kd2 Kb1 42.Kd1 Le4 43.Kd2 Lc2
44.h4 Lf5 45.Kd1 Le4 46.Kd2 Lc2) 28...b6
29.ef6 gf6 30.Sc3 (30.Sg3 Lg6 (30...Lb1) )
30...Lg6! 31.h3 h4 32.Lf2 f5 with the next
Kd6, c5, Kc6, Lf7, c4 and Black must to
win.
27.Kd2?
White is clearly much worse. Black played
the rest of the game very well.
As Dr. Euwe mentioned, White could get
ecellent drawing chances with 27.h3 h4
28.Kf3. However, we prefer here an
immediate 27.Kf3 and in case of 27...f6
28.ef6 Lf6 29.b4, because he felt the
inclusion of moves h3 and & h4 favors
black.
27...c5 28.a4
Moving pawns on the side you are weaker,
unless for a good reason, is not usually a
good idea. He would be better off playing a
waiting move like Ke2.
FIDE SURVEYS  Sam Palatnik 3


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2012 03 30 Georg Mohr Capablanca and the Endgames
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2013 09 23, Sam Palatnik Loud song about a “Pair of Elephants”
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2010 01 30 Efstratios Grivas The Useless Isolani
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2013 09 23, Dejan Bojkov What Rooks Want
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2013 01 30, Alonso Zapata Useless Pieces
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2012 08 31 Uwe Bönsch The Queen s Gambit
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2010 09 29 Efstratios Grivas Endgame Analysis
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 06 29, Susan Polgar The Game Is Not Over Until It Is Over
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2013 04 01, Georg Mohr Bobby Fischer and the square d5
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 08 01, Andrew Martin Game analysis
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 04 26, Vereslav Eingorn The positional piece sacrifice as a technical r
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2013 04 28, Vereslav Eingorn Rook vs Bishop
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 02 28, Alonso Zapata Paralysis
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2013 02 18, Adrian Mikhalchishin
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 02 28, Adrian Mikhalchishin Opening bluff
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2014 08 01, Boris Avrukh Exchange sacrifice
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2010 04 28 Jeroen Bosch Euwe s Long Moves
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2010 04 28 Jeroen Bosch Queen Endings General Principles
FIDE Trainers Surveys 2011 10 04 Efstratios Grivas Legendary Endings

więcej podobnych podstron