John Boston
Sociology 101
October 31, 1996

	If I had the power to abolish poverty in the United States I would  do it in a second.  Abolishing poverty would be almost impossible because there are just  to many poor people for one person to help  to abolish poverty we must all work to help those who are poor get out of this condition.
	There are two types of poor, there are people who are relatively poor and there are people who are absolutely poor.  People who are relatively  poor  are poor  compared to the people around them.  These people usually only have the bare necessities to survive like food, clothing or shelter.  They might even have a steady job  but they just don't have any real wealth.  In fact people who are relatively poor are usually in the lower 5% of the population in terms of wealth.  People who  live the state of absolute poverty can not sustain a certain level of living . These people have a hard time getting money for food , clothing, or shelter.  People who are absolutely poor have a rough time getting money to put food on the table one day  and the next day they might not have any money to put food on the table.   
Not all people who are relatively poor are  absolutely poor, but, all people who are absolutely poor are relatively poor.   These types of poor are found all throughout the world especially in underdeveloped countries.  In the United States  a  advanced  well-developed country both absolute and relative poverty are present throughout the country.

	I think that absolute poverty has no beneficial purposes to society.  However, relative poverty does have beneficial functions.  I think that relative poverty can make people competitive.  It would do this because people always try to do better then the people around them.  This competitiveness  might force people to work overtime or even two jobs in order to make more than the people around them.  There are some major costs that  both poverty's have on society.  These costs include:  In areas of high poverty there are usually the same areas of high  violence.  A second cost to society might be that some people in poverty might become welfare dependent, this means that they rely solely on welfare to pay  for everything and they don't even try to find a job of there own.  These negative costs  definitely outweigh the benefits.  
	If I had control of  the poverty situation in the United States I would only try to eliminate absolute poverty.  I first would raise the taxes of the rich and the upper middle class.  Then  I would raise the tax  on  alcohol and tobacco.  Then I would  do some refinancing of governments spending.  With all the money that this creates I would  setup cheep but nice government housing, government grocery stores and government clothing stores.  Then I would setup a job training program that gives poor people government jobs.  I would also send the best teachers  to the ghetto schools.  These programs will not work unless the poor work to get out of there citations.  

	I can invasion a society without  absolute poverty and without relative poverty.  In a society without absolute poverty everyone that could work would have a job, there would be little crime just a great place to live.  In a society without relative poverty people would all have the same wealth there would be no competition to be better then anyone.  This type of society is only possible in the imagination.
John Boston
Sociology 101
October 31, 1996

	If I had the power to abolish poverty in the United States I would  do it in a second.  Abolishing poverty would be almost impossible because there are just  to many poor people for one person to help  to abolish poverty we must all work to help those who are poor get out of this condition.
	There are two types of poor, there are people who are relatively poor and there are people who are absolutely poor.  People who are relatively  poor  are poor  compared to the people around them.  These people usually only have the bare necessities to survive like food, clothing or shelter.  They might even have a steady job  but they just don't have any real wealth.  In fact people who are relatively poor are usually in the lower 5% of the population in terms of wealth.  People who  live the state of absolute poverty can not sustain a certain level of living . These people have a hard time getting money for food , clothing, or shelter.  People who are absolutely poor have a rough time getting money to put food on the table one day  and the next day they might not have any money to put food on the table.   
Not all people who are relatively poor are  absolutely poor, but, all people who are absolutely poor are relatively poor.   These types of poor are found all throughout the world especially in underdeveloped countries.  In the United States  a  advanced  well-developed country both absolute and relative poverty are present throughout the country.

	I think that absolute poverty has no beneficial purposes to society.  However, relative poverty does have beneficial functions.  I think that relative poverty can make people competitive.  It would do this because people always try to do better then the people around them.  This competitiveness  might force people to work overtime or even two jobs in order to make more than the people around them.  There are some major costs that  both poverty's have on society.  These costs include:  In areas of high poverty there are usually the same areas of high  violence.  A second cost to society might be that some people in poverty might become welfare dependent, this means that they rely solely on welfare to pay  for everything and they don't even try to find a job of there own.  These negative costs  definitely outweigh the benefits.  
	If I had control of  the poverty situation in the United States I would only try to eliminate absolute poverty.  I first would raise the taxes of the rich and the upper middle class.  Then  I would raise the tax  on  alcohol and tobacco.  Then I would  do some refinancing of governments spending.  With all the money that this creates I would  setup cheep but nice government housing, government grocery stores and government clothing stores.  Then I would setup a job training program that gives poor people government jobs.  I would also send the best teachers  to the ghetto schools.  These programs will not work unless the poor work to get out of there citations.  

	I can invasion a society without  absolute poverty and without relative poverty.  In a society without absolute poverty everyone that could work would have a job, there would be little crime just a great place to live.  In a society without relative poverty people would all have the same wealth there would be no competition to be better then anyone.  This type of society is only possible in the imagination.










John Boston
Sociology 101
October 31, 1996

	If I had the power to abolish poverty in the United States I would  do it in a second.  Abolishing poverty would be almost impossible because there are just  to many poor people for one person to help  to abolish poverty we must all work to help those who are poor get out of this condition.
	There are two types of poor, there are people who are relatively poor and there are people who are absolutely poor.  People who are relatively  poor  are poor  compared to the people around them.  These people usually only have the bare necessities to survive like food, clothing or shelter.  They might even have a steady job  but they just don't have any real wealth.  In fact people who are relatively poor are usually in the lower 5% of the population in terms of wealth.  People who  live the state of absolute poverty can not sustain a certain level of living . These people have a hard time getting money for food , clothing, or shelter.  People who are absolutely poor have a rough time getting money to put food on the table one day  and the next day they might not have any money to put food on the table.   
Not all people who are relatively poor are  absolutely poor, but, all people who are absolutely poor are relatively poor.   These types of poor are found all throughout the world especially in underdeveloped countries.  In the United States  a  advanced  well-developed country both absolute and relative poverty are present throughout the country.

	I think that absolute poverty has no beneficial purposes to society.  However, relative poverty does have beneficial functions.  I think that relative poverty can make people competitive.  It would do this because people always try to do better then the people around them.  This competitiveness  might force people to work overtime or even two jobs in order to make more than the people around them.  There are some major costs that  both poverty's have on society.  These costs include:  In areas of high poverty there are usually the same areas of high  violence.  A second cost to society might be that some people in poverty might become welfare dependent, this means that they rely solely on welfare to pay  for everything and they don't even try to find a job of there own.  These negative costs  definitely outweigh the benefits.  
	If I had control of  the poverty situation in the United States I would only try to eliminate absolute poverty.  I first would raise the taxes of the rich and the upper middle class.  Then  I would raise the tax  on  alcohol and tobacco.  Then I would  do some refinancing of governments spending.  With all the money that this creates I would  setup cheep but nice government housing, government grocery stores and government clothing stores.  Then I would setup a job training program that gives poor people government jobs.  I would also send the best teachers  to the ghetto schools.  These programs will not work unless the poor work to get out of there citations.  

	I can invasion a society without  absolute poverty and without relative poverty.  In a society without absolute poverty everyone that could work would have a job, there would be little crime just a great place to live.  In a society without relative poverty people would all have the same wealth there would be no competition to be better then anyone.  This type of society is only possible in the imagination.










John Boston
Sociology 101
October 31, 1996

	If I had the power to abolish poverty in the United States I would  do it in a second.  Abolishing poverty would be almost impossible because there are just  to many poor people for one person to help  to abolish poverty we must all work to help those who are poor get out of this condition.
	There are two types of poor, there are people who are relatively poor and there are people who are absolutely poor.  People who are relatively  poor  are poor  compared to the people around