Jonagold na 12 podkładkach
PLONY 8. letnie (1996-2001)i WSKAŻNIK PLENNOŚCI
ANALIZY WARIANCJI (ANOVA)
Analysis of Variance for Pppp-Wiosna 2002 [cm2]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Podkladka 11662,8 11 1060,26 37,45 0,0000
Residual 2038,57 72 28,3135
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (corrected) 13701,4 83
Analysis of Variance for Plon 1996-2001 [kg/drzewo]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Podkladka 29484,9 11 2680,44 28,44 0,0000
Residual 6785,63 72 94,2448
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (corrected) 36270,5 83
Analysis of Variance for Wskaźnik intensywności owocowania (WIO) =
= Stosunek plonu do Pppp [kg/cm2]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Podkladka 10,388 11 0,94436 6,33 0,0000
Residual 10,7338 72 0,149081
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (corrected) 21,1218 83
Analysis of Variance for Plon 1996-2001 [t/ha]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Podkladka 46070,1 11 4188,19 28,44 0,0000
Residual 10602,5 72 147,257
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (corrected) 56672,7 83
PORÓWNANIA ŚREDNICH (Multiplr Range Tests}
- na podstawie testu Newmana Keulsa przy poziomie wiarygodności 5%
(prawdopodobieństwo błędu 5%]
Multiple Comparisons for PpppWios02cm2 by Podkladka
-------------------------------------------------------------
Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls
Podkladka Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups
-------------------------------------------------------------
P 22 9 10,2955 X
PB-4 4 10,6709 X
B 146 10 19,1187 X
B 9 8 31,1288 X
M.9-T337 8 31,4206 X
M.9-T339 8 32,1637 X
P 60 6 32,6685 X
M.9-984 8 33,4963 X
Nr 47 5 34,4605 X
M.26 5 34,7917 X
M.9-EMLA 8 34,8884 X
M.7 5 61,3021 X
-------------------------------------------------------------
Multiple Comparisons for Plon9601KgDrze by Podkladka
-------------------------------------------------------------
Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls
Podkladka Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups
-------------------------------------------------------------
PB-4 4 26,275 X
P 22 9 31,7444 X
B 146 10 44,65 X
B 9 8 63,05 X
M.9-984 8 63,9 XX
M.9-T337 8 65,3375 XX
M.9-EMLA 8 69,05 XX
M.9-T339 8 74,7125 XX
Nr 47 5 77,5 XX
P 60 6 78,05 XX
M.26 5 79,9 X
M.7 5 99,48 X
-------------------------------------------------------------
Multiple Comparisons for WIEkgNaCm2 by Podkladka
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls
Podkladka Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M.7 5 1,66299 X
M.9-984 8 1,93317 XX
M.9-EMLA 8 2,00193 XX
M.9-T337 8 2,11285 XX
B 9 8 2,11597 XX
Nr 47 5 2,21655 XX
M.26 5 2,29581 XX
M.9-T339 8 2,35106 X
B 146 10 2,42077 X
P 60 6 2,42161 X
PB-4 4 2,50786 X
P 22 9 3,08807 X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------