IMG43

IMG43



Ernst Mach

voIvcd. Mach, w ho was srruck by this fact, drew from it thc conclusion that thc csscncc ot mclody must rcsidc in a surn ot spccial scnsations which as notc scnsations (Toncmpfindttngcn) accompany thc notes.'-'

Patrick J. Capretta in his A Hiftory of Psychology: In Otulinę (New York, 1967) has argucd that whilc Mach may havc becn a pionccr ot Gcstalt psychology, noncthcless, hc was on thc wrong patii and may actually have hindered thc dcvclopmcnt of this ncw orientation and school in psychology*

Ernst Mach 1885), an erninem Austrian physicist by profession. probably presented thc first elear cxposition of thc Gcstalt phenomenon as it applied to pcrccption. He argucd that ccrtain arrangements of cicments—for cx-ainplc, lines and anglcs in a geometrie figuro—eausc the cmcrgcncc of dif-ferent "totals” reported by the obscrvcr as stpiarcs, trianglcs, circlcs, etc. Paradoxical as it may secm. Mach*s stand in conceiving of thr ncw or dif-ferent totals as still another sensory content (in kccping with thc Wundtian tradition) rcprćscntcd a thcorctical position in psychology that was for all intents and purposes antithctical to thc cvcntual dcvclopments in Gcstalt Psychology. It must be emphasized that Mach favored a psychology of sen-sation, thc doctrinc that all knowlcdgc is scnsorial.4

Werę Mach and Ehrcnfels, as historian Gard ner Murphy suggests, en-gaged in thc futilc gesture of buttressing a toitcring structuralism by the addition of superordinatc cicments? 0

Alcxius Mcinong, best known as thc founder of the first Austrian psy-chological laboratory at Graz in 1894, actually camc somewhat eloser to the Gcstalt position than did either Mach or Ehrcnfels in recognizing thc im-portancc of thc pcrccptual act itsclf as giving risc to form-quality, or as Mcinong preferred to cali it “founded content.”0

Mach Bands

Mach’s phcnomćnalism has becn cririci/.ed so often that we may tend to overlook those occasions when it may havc significantly contributed to important scicntific discoverics. An ontological phenomenalist by identifying thc extcrnal world with sensory impressions often tends to be morc alert to sensory pcculiaritics than ordinary pcoplc who commonly dismiss them as sense illusions or misidcntifications of some sort. What we now cali "Mach bands” probably could have bcen no-ticed thouands of years ago, and perhaps wcrc, but Mach seems to havc becn thc first to take them seriously. They can be notieed all around us and at almost any timc, but the natural tcndcncy is simply not to bciicvc what goes so contrary to our expcctations. As a good phenom-

cnalist, howcvcr, Mach insisted on bclicving wint hr symbol or as a sensory stand-in for something clse but J! ’ T “ * ticular arrangement of scnsations. But what arc “Mach    Ta

what is so strange nbout them?    ' And

psychologic.il work during thc 187OS.


accepted "Talbot-plateau law" (.835), thc rotating disc S becn gray on the wter edge becoming constantly if irregularly toward thc tnner edge. In fac, howeser, thcrc appeared ,w„ color band that were not supposcd to ex,st at all.' Toward the darker edge therc was a band that was .00 dark and toward the lighter edge therc was band that was too l.ght (dtagrams a, 3). How could this be cxplained> Mach svrote fivc articlcs bctwcen ,865 and ,868 ,0 help „lve the problem. He soon camc to the conclusion, using diagrams show color intern,ty that the peculiar bands probably reflected neurological inhibitions and that they were mercly "subjective," in that mensurimr instruments not using the hurnan cye would not record them Unfortunatcly, not enough was known about neurological “inhibi tion" at the „me to test Mach’s hypothesis properly, hence like his discovery of gcstalt qualilics, his Work on these strange bands was ncglcctcd and generally forgotten for somc thirty ycars. It is possible that this neglcct may havc been a factor together with the Wosyka espetience in influencing Mach gradually to abandon his cxperimcntal


DIAGRAM 2.

Black-whitc color disk with nick (and superimposed dotted lines and Greek 1011015).

(Couriesy oj Holden-Djy Incorporated)

49


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
IMG43 Ernst Mach thc auilior was a philosophical amatcur and obviously did not know what hc was tal
IMG60 Ernst Mach 1vocal among his "supporters." Thcy followcd Einstein under the im* pres
IMG28 Ernst Mach sccond npparatus was ablc to dcmonstratc the Doppler cffcct, at least with regard
IMG30 Ernst Mach Mach ro Poppcr-Lynkcus in 1862. The friendship immcdiately took hołd. Joscf Popper
IMG47 Ernst A lach Mach also was intrigued by Miillers book The Phantasms of Sight (1826), which fu
IMG71 Ernst Mach was ncvcr clcarly cxprcsscd, and, whilc an cxtcnsion of common scnsc practical, an
IMG82 Ernst Mach IX Josiah Roycc was familiar with Machs Mechanics and thcory of ccon-omy aTearly&q
IMG47 Ernst Mach catcd members of thc communist movcmcm to grasp thc diffcrcnce. A conscqucncc of t
IMG48 Ernst Mach thc mcrging of thc Bol$hevik and Mcnshcvik fractions I was finally removed from th
IMGr4 r Ernst Mach and was grounded in his childhood upbringing and hcalth. Mach was physically wcak
IMGs4 Ernst Mach futurę ren li ty or happening. He preferred the pragmatic notion that an assertion
IMG?8 Ernst Mach
IMG83 Ernst Mach practical with pcrhaps thc caceptiun of Wittgcnstcin who is in somc way also a poc
IMG99 Ernst Mach books on William James and pragmatism. During the last twenty ycars of his life hc
IMG52 Ernst Mach thc Tcchnical Univcrsi(y of Ziirich wcancd him back to Switzcrland in 1912. Threc
IMG45 Ernst Mach as vertic.il and unconsciously infcr thc inclination of ihe trccs. Of coursc thc o
IMG48 Ernst Mach in 1866 hc gavc the first fuli cxposition. . . 2h Mach s first datcd op-position t
IMG52 Ernst Mach tcrms o£ Mach’s sccond and third dcfinitions hc ncvcr intcridcd such a rcstriction
IMG57 Ernst Mach rcgular membcrship in thc Austrian Acadcmy of Science, ihc most prcstigious scicnt

więcej podobnych podstron