SkanB

30

0 0.1 0.2

(a)

	0	0.1	0.2	0.3	0.4	0.5	Total
child’s 1 2	—	4	1 1	-	—	-	5 1
3 4	1 3	1	—	—	—	—	i 4
5	1	—	1	—	—	—	2
6 7 8 9 10	2	2	2 2 1 2	-	-	-	6 2 1 7
	2	3		-	-	-
11	1	1	3	—	—	—	5
12	—	1	3	1	—	—	5
13	1	3	5	-	—	—	9
adult 1	_	1	18	2	_	1	22
2	1	6	14	2	—	2	25
3	—	6	14	2	2	1	25
4	4	6	14	2	1	2	29
5	3	7	8	8	3	—	29
6	5	4	2	2	1	1	15
7	2	3	1	1	1	—	8
8	6	2	1	—	—	—	9
Total	32	50	93	20	8	7	210

Shoes and Pałtens

0.3    0.4    0.5

(b)

from Londom i

are assocńfl (Tabłe 8b). O dełiberately a the wearer: nshed to conw h*s ‘best\ mtt

Buckie
Front-Laced /
♦—-* Side -laced
7 Front - V latchet	;
Side * latchet
Buckie/ Latchet
r—~~ t L . \ Toggle
Hot Known

	0	0.1	0.2	0.3	0.4	0.5	Total
Buckie	6	7	23	3	1	1	41
Front-laced	4	10	11	—	—	—	25
Side-laced	1	3	7	—	—	—	11
Front-latchet	5	13	24	1	—	—	43
Side-latchet	3	4	2	4	3	2	18
Buckie or latchet	1	3	11	1	2	1	19
Toggle	1	1	—	—	—	—	2
Not known	11	9	15	11	2	3	51
Total	32	50	93	20	8	7	210

Table 8: shoes from 'Baynards Castle’, late 14th cen tury. The popularity of the ‘poulaine’ - albeit of modest proportions - can be judged from this table, which is an expression of the ratio between the length of the shoe beyond the position of the toes (estimated by impressions on the sole) and the length of the wearer’s foot. This ratio, calculated as a fraction, can be compared with (a) the shoe sizes according to the modem English Shoe Size Scales (see below, pp. 102-5) and (b) the style of shoe.

1