How to svmbolize a logical formula with numbers:
Linę I: (3x)(x-sy)
Linę 2: |
( |
3 |
X |
) |
( |
X |
=5 |
s |
y |
) |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 | |
Linę 3: |
8 |
4 |
11 |
9 |
8 |
11 |
5 |
7 |
13 |
9 |
4 |
4 |
i |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 | ||
8 |
4 |
11 |
9 |
8 |
u |
5 |
7 |
13 |
9 | |
Linę 4: |
2 |
x 3 |
X 5 |
X 7 |
X 11 |
X 13 |
X 17 |
X 19 |
x 23 |
x 29 |
Every number says something in logie or mathematics.
Two definitions: Dem (x,y)
in for put
Sub(x, 13, y)
< (kucek** tflU y
Formula x is a logical proof of formula y.
means: v x ^ 3
This is the Godeł number of the formula that we obtain from formula x when we substitute for the symbol with Godeł number 13 a formula with Godeł number y.
Gddel Theorem: < * #
U (n): ^ (x) ~ Dcm(x,y) which means:
For every x, it is not true that x is the proof of y.
(G): (x) ~ Dem(x, sub(n, 13,n)) which means:
^ For every x, it is not truć that x is the proof of sub(n,13,n), or
For every x, it is not truć that x is the proof of formula n, if for y in n you put formula n.
In other words: In (x) - Dem(x,y) we put (n) in the place of y:
______t_
I (x) - Dem(x,y),
and obtain (x) ~ Dem(x,(x) - Dem(x,y));
For every x it is not true that x is the proof of the formula that says that
for every x, x is not the proof of any formula y; or
There is no proof for a formula that says there is no proof for it.
But (x) ~ Dem(x,(x) - Dem(x,y)) is equivalent to (G): (x) - Dem(x, sub(n, 13,n)).
So (G) says "I do not have a proof', and it is true.
(G) is true but cannot be proved.