Q=84,394
[kN]
Z
1,7248 [m]
0,9125
Q
`
W=2,15 [m]
3,15
[m]
Rysunek do metody Protodiakonowa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q=84,394 |
[kN] |
Z |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,7248 [m] |
0,9125 |
|
|
|
Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W=2,15 [m] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[m] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rysunek do metody Cymbariewicza |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,05 [m] |
|
|
|
|
|
Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,15 |
[m] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a |
|
|
|
a |
|
|
|
|
a= 1.21[m] |
|
3,15 |
[m] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uzasadnienie wyboru metody obliczeń
Ze względu na niewielką głębokość, na jakiej wykonane jest wyrobisko chodnikowe, tj. H=125 [m], można przyjąć do obliczeń obudowy wielkości obciążenia wyliczone metodą Cymbariewicza. Metody Protodiakonowa i Sałustowicza są słuszne dla wyrobisk wykonanych na dużych i bardzo dużych głębokościach.
