2906543942

2906543942



120

Bunc V. J. Heller, S. Sprynarova, R. Zdanowicz. Comparison of the anaerobic threshold and mechanical efficiency of running in young and adult athletes. Int. J. Sports Med. 7:156-160, 1986

Caiozzo V. J. , J. A. Davis, J. F. E is, J.L. Azus,

R. Vandagriff, C. A. Prietto, W.C. McMaster. A comparison of gas exchange indices used to detect the anaerobic threshold. J. Appl. Physiol. 53: 1184-1189, 1982.

Chwalbińska-Moneta J. Pomiar progu anaerobowego jako metoda oceny stopnia wytrenowania wytrzymałości. W: Markiewicz L red. Fizjologiczne podstawy treningu sportowego -wytrzymałość. Wyd. AWF Warszawa, 1984, 36-56.

Chwalbińska-Moneta J. , 0. Hanninen. Effect of active warming-up on thermoregulatory, circulatory, and responses to incremental exercise in endurance-trained athletes. Int. J. Sports Med. 10:25-29, 1989.

Clausen J.P. Effect of physical training on cardiovascular adjustments to exercise in man. Physiol. Rev. 57:779-815,

77.

Conconi F M. Ferrar , P. G. Ziglio, P. Droghett

. Codeca. Determination of the anaerobic threshold by a noninvasive field test in runners. J. Appl Physiol.

4: 869-873, 1982.

Connett R. J. , T. E.J. Gayeski, C. R. Honig. Lactate accumu-lation in fully aerobic, working dog gracilis muscle.

Am. J. Physiol. 246: H120-H128, 1984.

Connett R. J. , C. R. Honig, T. E.J. Gayeski, G. A. Brooks. Defining hypoxia:    a systems view of V0 glycolysis,

energetics, and intracel1 ul ar PO. J. Appl. Physiol. 68:833-842, 1990.



Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
120 Bunc V. J. Heller, S. Sprynarova, R. Zdanowicz. Comparison of the anaerobic threshold and mechan
StepperCompare COMPARISON OF THE 74194 - UNIPOLAR AND BIPOLAR STEP GENERATOR CONFIGURATIONS ©2003 RO
174 Gowen, L. K., Feldman, S. S., Diaz, R., et Yisrael, D. S. (2004). A comparison of the sexual beh
174 Gowen, L. K., Feldman, S. S., Diaz, R., et Yisrael, D. S. (2004). A comparison of the sexual beh
00152 ?cb17ca464b8901288e6dd4f0513e8d 153 Optimization and Sensitiyity Analysis Table 14. Cost Comp
00180 ae1610738fe2b0daed20d48e9bab9f 181 Economic Contro! Chart Models with Cycle Duration Constra
Comparison of the laying and egg weighl of laying... 17 age of hens a. b - difference significam at
56 L. Berkowski 56 L. Berkowski Table 1. Comparison of the resulls of superplastic deformation at th
320 LE POUVOIR SUBUMINAL KING, B. T., & JANIS, I. L. (1956). Comparison of the effectiveness of
Figurę 7. Misalarm rates comparison. IC QFP IC EGA The histogram of the images of the solder pastę a
The above calculations (see Tables 19 - 22) and the subsequent comparison of the ranking of threats&
Abstract Comparison of security in GSM and UMTS systems The scope of my work encompasses the analysi
DSC00019 cm Bonr. htadiyccphabc fypt Cafe „ ł-, doRrfwepholic lype 1 Icbngctod mzdel Comparison
00235 Nff6c37df02571c6249b1ae331f002f 237 Applications of the EWMA Box, G. E. P., and Jenkins, G. M

więcej podobnych podstron