Czas. Stomatol.,
U. Kaczmarek i in.
Tabela 5 . Związek wybranych czynników z wyborem technik opracowania ubytku przez stomatologów (wartości testów nieparametrycznych opartych na dystrybucji y} badanej dwustronny m testem dokładnym Fishera lub testem Fishera Freemana Haltona)
^\Iechnika Czynniki\_ |
PRR |
Konwencjo nalna |
Adhezyjna |
Szczelinowa |
Tunelowa |
ART |
Ubytek klasy I | ||||||
Wiek |
X2 = 10,60 |
X2 = 5,921 |
X2 = 8.058 |
X2 = 12,67 |
X2 = 8.635 |
X2 = 11.85 |
stomatologa |
dt = 9. |
dt = 9, |
dt = 12, |
dt = 9. |
dt = 9 |
dt = 9. |
p = 0,3045 |
p = 0,7478 |
p = 0,7805 |
p = 0,1779 |
p = 0,4717 |
p = 0,2217 | |
Lata pracy |
Z2 = 15,72 |
x2= 11,94 |
Z2 = 14,38 |
z2 = 12.42 |
Z2 = 12,37 |
Z2 = 11-12 |
zawodowej |
dt = 12, |
dt = 12, |
dt = 16, |
dt = 12, |
dt = 12, |
dt = 12, |
p = 0,2043 |
p = 0,4506 |
p = 0,5706 |
p = 0,4126 |
p = 0,4164 |
p = 0,5187 | |
Posiadanie |
Z2-11,31 |
X2 = 6,030 |
X2 = 10,21 |
X2 = 9,093 |
X2 = 9,816 |
X2 = 8,474 |
specjalizacji |
dt = 9, |
dt = 9, |
dt = 9. |
dt = 9. |
dt = 9, |
dt = 9. |
p = 0,2548 |
p = 0,7369 |
p = 0,3337 |
p = 0,4288 |
p = 0,3656 |
p = 0,4872 | |
Sektor pracy |
X2 = 2,859 |
X2 = 6,520 |
X2 = 8,336 |
X2 = 4,603 |
X2 = 3.608 |
X2 = 2,479 |
dt = 6, |
dt = 6, |
dt = 8 |
dt = 6. |
dt = 6. |
dt = 6, | |
p = 0,8263 |
p = 0,3675 |
p = 0,4014 |
p = 0,5956 |
p = 0,7296 |
p = 0,8708 | |
Współpraca |
Z2= 1.158 |
X2 = 1,613 |
X2 = 0,7394 |
X2 = 2,963 |
z2 = 2.358 |
X2 = 3,593 |
dziecka |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3, |
p = 0,7631 |
p = 0,6564 |
p = 0,8639 |
p = 0,3974 |
p = 0,5015 |
p = 0,0438* | |
Intensywność |
X2 = 1,279 |
X2= 1,754 |
X2= 1,670 |
X2 = 3,2380 |
X2 = 3,796 |
X2 = 8,109 |
próchnicy |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3, |
p = 0,7341 |
p = 0,6251 |
p = 0,6436 |
p = 0,3563 |
p = 0,2844 |
p = 0,050* | |
Kontrola wil- |
z2 = 5,649 |
z2-7.461 |
Z2 = 2,832 |
Z2 = 3,520 |
Z2 = 3,206 |
z2 = 3,027 |
goci |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3, |
p = 0,13 |
p = 0,050* |
p = 0,4183 |
p = 0,3182 |
p = 0,3609 |
p = 0,3875 | |
Ubytek klasy II | ||||||
Wiek |
X2 = 8,614 |
x2 = 8,919 |
X2 = 7,130 |
X2 = 11-11 |
X2 = 8,509 |
X2 = 10,56 |
stomatologa |
dt = 9, |
dt = 9. |
dt = 9. |
dt = 9. |
dt = 9. |
dt = 9. |
p = 0,4736 |
p = 0.4448 |
p = 0,6236 |
p = 0,2683 |
p = 0,4838 |
p = 0,3072 | |
Lata pracv |
z2 - 11,79 |
x2= 11,90 |
z2 = 10,04 |
Z2 = 17,66 |
Z2 = 9.652 |
Z2 =10,55 |
zawodowej |
dt = 12. |
dt = 12. |
dt = 12, |
dt = 12, |
dt = 12, |
dt = 12, |
p = 0,4629 |
p = 0,4536 |
p = 0,6127 |
p = 0,1265 |
p = 0,6464 |
p = 0,5681 | |
Posiadanie |
X2 = 10,90 |
X2 = 3,663 |
X2 = 7,590 |
X2 = 8,654 |
X2 = 11,66 |
X2 = 5,000 |
specjalizacji |
dt = 9, |
dt = 9, |
dt = 9. |
dt = 9, |
dt = 9. |
dt = 9. |
p = 0,2830 |
p = 0,9322 |
p = 0,5759 |
p = 0,4698 |
p = 0,2329 |
p = 0,8343 | |
Sektor pracy |
Z2 = 3,318 |
X2 = 5,659 |
X2= 10,21 |
z2 = 6,722 |
Z2 = 3,582 |
z2 = 3,655 |
dt = 6, |
dt = 6, |
dt = 6. |
dt = 6, |
dt = 6, |
dt = 6, | |
p = 0,7680 |
p = 0,4625 |
p = 0,1161 |
p = 0,3474 |
p = 0,7330 |
p = 0,7232 | |
Współpraca |
X2 = 1,270 |
X2 = 1.648 |
Z2 =1.273 |
X2 = 0,9458 |
X2 = 3,046 |
X2= 1.708 |
dziecka |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3, |
dt = 1, |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3, |
p = 0,7362 |
p = 0,7357 |
p = 0,4154 |
p = 0,8144 |
p = 0,3846 |
p = 0,6353 | |
Intensywność |
X2 = 1,872 |
X2 = 1,595 |
X2 = 1,292 |
X2= 1,469 |
X2 = 3.184 |
X2 = 6,535 |
próchnicy |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3, |
p = 0,5994 |
p = 0,6605 |
p = 0,7311 |
p = 0,6895 |
p = 0,3642 |
p = 0.0883 | |
Kontrola |
x2 = 3.840 |
Z2 = 8.347 |
Z2 = 3,423 |
z2 = 3.641 |
z2 = 0,2532 |
Z2 = 1-811 |
wilgoci |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3, |
dt = 3. |
dt = 3, |
p = 0,2793 |
p = 0,0394* |
p = 0,3308 |
p = 0,3029 |
p = 0,4696 |
p = 0,6124 |
Istotność różnic na poziomie: * - p<0,05.
580