Wyniki wyszukiwana dla hasla APC 13 09 11 39 7 3d APC 13 09 11 39 7 3d turn out: 1) (tr) produce, 2) (int) prAPC 13 09 11 39 6 3d If the indirect question is part of a question, we put a question marAPC 13 09 11 46 7 3d afterwards at a later time (adv) e.g. They went to the ci nem a and aAPC 13 09 02# 08 7 3d Countable nouns: ♦ can take singular or plural verbs. e APC 13 09 02# 50 7 3d ♦ We use one or one of ... when we mean one person/thing out of many.APC 13 09 04 00 7 3d fali 1) (int) break into apart: pieces, 2) (int) end in failure 1. &nbAPC 13 09 05 08 7 3d e.g. Can/Could/May I have a piece of that cake, please? We normally rAPC 13 09 05 46 7 3d Expressing probability He ought to/should be in now. (He is probably in.)APC 13 09 05 58 7 3d Making suggestions a) Shall we visit Grandma this wAPC 13 09 05 51 7 3d The Passive - Have Something i Done The Forbidden City is situated in ItheAPC 13 09 05 36 7 3d ♦ The agent is often omitted in the passive sentence when the subjectAPC 13 09 06 53 7 3d needn t ► needn t/didn t need to/didn t have to He said, You needn t pay APC 13 09 06 07 7 3d I ■ b) when we report the content of a letter, article, etc. while reAPC 13 09 07 20 7 3d hołd in: (tr) restrain; keep under control You shouldiYt hołd.....in......APC 13 09 07 02 7 3d *4 Notę: When the expressions only after, only by, only if, only APC 13 09 07 40 7 3d e.g. IfSteve calls, tell hlm / // be back in ten minutes. (Steve mighAPC 13 09 07 57 7 3d In this case, if means whether. We can also use should after if to taAPC 13 09 07! 35 7 3d • would rather (present) e.g. I d rather Nick droveAPC 13 09 08 19 7 3d It cannot be omitted when it is the subject of the relative clause. WAPC 13 09 08 32 7 3d such/so... that, so, consequently, as a result, therefore, for tWybierz strone: {
2 ]