RUBIN drzewa 4. letnie na P 59
oraz 2 letnie na P 22 lub P 16
LICZBA PĄKÓW KWIATOWYCH I ICH ROZMIESZCZENIE
Analysis of Variance for ProcentWierzcholk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kombinacja 816,213 2 408,106 6,05 0,0058
Residual 2224,95 33 67,4227
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (corrected) 3041,16 35
Analysis of Variance for ProcentBocznych
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kombinacja 10080,9 2 5040,43 56,68 0,0000
Residual 2934,37 33 88,9203
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (corrected) 13015,2 35
Analysis of Variance for ProcenNaKrotkop
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kombinacja 12430,6 2 6215,32 104,88 0,0000
Residual 1955,71 33 59,2639
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (corrected) 14386,4 35
Analysis of Variance for BlissWierzcholk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kombinacja 305,509 2 152,755 5,95 0,0062
Residual 847,182 33 25,6722
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (corrected) 1152,69 35
Analysis of Variance for BlissBocznych
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kombinacja 4165,14 2 2082,57 55,21 0,0000
Residual 1244,82 33 37,7218
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (corrected) 5409,96 35
Analysis of Variance for BlissNaKrotkop
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kombinacja 5197,54 2 2598,77 102,09 0,0000
Residual 840,075 33 25,4568
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (corrected) 6037,62 35
Analysis of Variance for PakowKwiatNaDrzewo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kombinacja 6565,72 2 3282,86 4,75 0,0153
Residual 22788,6 33 690,563
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (corrected) 29354,3 35
PORÓWNANIE ŚREDNICH
Multiple Comparisons for ProcentWierzcholk by Kombinacja
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls
Kombinacja Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P 59-4letni 12 30,3542 X
P 16 I 12 31,3125 X
P 22 12 40,9 X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multiple Comparisons for ProcentBocznych by Kombinacja
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls
Kombinacja Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P 59-4letni 12 16,5042 X
P 22 12 43,3917 X
P 16 I 12 56,7417 X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multiple Comparisons for BlissWierzcholk by Kombinacja
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls
Kombinacja Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P 59-4letni 12 33,2174 X
P 16 I 12 33,868 X
P 22 12 39,6967 X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multiple Comparisons for BlissBocznych by Kombinacja
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls
Kombinacja Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P 59-4letni 12 23,2266 X
P 22 12 41,1533 X
P 16 I 12 48,9116 X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multiple Comparisons for BlissNaKrotkop by Kombinacja
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls
Kombinacja Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P 16 I 12 19,9661 X
P 22 12 23,28 X
P 59-4letni 12 46,9501 X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multiple Comparisons for PakowKwiatNaDrzewo by Kombinacja
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Method: 95,0 percent Student-Newman-Keuls
Kombinacja Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P 59-4letni 12 84,3333 X
P 22 12 94,8333 X
P 16 I 12 116,75 X
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------