Scan074

Scan074



74 AJ. Fawcett i R.I. Nicolson

Moretti, R., Bava, A., Torre, P., Antonello, R.M., Cazzato, G. (2002). Reading errors in patients with cerebellar vermis lesions. Journal ofNeurology, 249,461-468.

Nicolson, R.I. (1996). Developmental dyslexia: Past, present and futurę. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 2, 190-207.

Nicolson, R.I. (2002). The Dyslexia ecosystem. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 8, 55-66.

Nicolson, R.I., Fawcett, AJ. (1990). Automaticity: A new framework for dyslexia re-search? Cognition, 35,159-182.

Nicolson, R.I., Fawcett, AJ. (1996). The dyslexia early screening test. London: The Psy-chological Corporation.

Nicolson, R.I., Fawcett, AJ. (1999). Developmental dyslexia: The role ofthe cerebellum. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 5, 155-177.

Nicolson, R.I., Fawcett, A.J., Dean, P. (1995). Time-estimation deficits indevelopmental dyslexia - evidence for cerebellar involvement. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 259, 43-47.

Nicolson, R.I., Fawcett, A.J., Berry, E.L., Jenkins, I.H., Dean, P., Brooks, D J, (1999). Association of dbnormal cerebellar activation with motor leaming difficulties in dys-lexic adults. Lancet, 353,1662-1667.

Nicolson, R.I., Fawcett, A.J., Dean, P. (2001). Developmental dyslexia: the cerebellar deficit hypothesis. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 508-511.

Nicolson, R.I., Daum, I., Schugens, M.M., Fawcett, A.J., Schulz, A. (2002). Eyeblink conditioning indicates cerebellar abnormality in dyslexia. Experimental Brain Research, 143,42-50.

Paterson, S.J., Brown, J.H., Gsodl, M.K., Johnson, M.H., Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1999). Cognitive modularity and genetic disorders. Ścience, 286, 2355-2358.

Raberger, T., Wimmer, H. (2003). On the automaticity/cerebellar deficit hypothesis of dyslexia: balancing and continuouś rapid naming in dyslexic and ADHD children. Neuropsychologia, 41,1493-1497.

Rae, C., Harasty, J.A., Dzendrowsky, T.E., Talcott, J.B., Simpson, J.M., Blamire, A.M., Dixon, R.M., Lee, M.A., Thompson, C.H., Styles, P., Richardson, A.J., Stein, J.F. (2002). Cerebellar morphology in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1285-1292.

Ramus, F. (2001) Dyslexia - talk of two theories. Naturę, 412,393-395.

Ramus, F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: specific phonological deficit or generał sensorimotor dysfunction? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 212-218.

Ramus, F,, Pidgeon, E., Frith, U. (2003) The relationship between motor control and pho-nology in dyslexic children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 54, 712-722.

Schmahmann, J.D. (red.) (1997). The cerebellum and cognition. Academic Press.

Semrud-Clikeman, M., Biderman, J., Sprich-Buckminster, S., Lehman, B.K., Faraone, S. V., Norman, D. (1992). Comorbidity between ADDH and Leaming Disability. A re-view and report in a clinically referred sample. Journal of the American Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 439-448.

Shankweiler, D., Crain, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A.E., Liberman, A.M., Brady, S.A., Thomton, R., Lundąuist, E., Dreyer, L., Fletcher, J.M., Stuebing, K.K., Shaywitz, S.E., Shaywitz,

Rola móżdżku w dyslcksji 75 (1995). Cognitive profiles of reading-disabled children comporison of lan-I |hhh>' n k i I Is inphonology,morphology,andsyntax.Psychologie alSi tlencc, 6,149-156.

U.A., Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E. (1994). Interrelationships between read-Imj/ .ihubility and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. [W:J The Leurning Disabili-

■    Spectrum: ADD, ADHD andLD. A.J. Caputę, P.J. Accardo, B.K. Shapiro (red.), ■bgllmioi-c. MD: York Press.

M., Hulme, C. (1994). The developmentofphonological skills. Philosophical linris ofthe Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 346,21 -27. M.J., Bryant, P.E., Hulme, C. (1996). Theoreticalandmethodologicalpitfalls B pi tiuiking comparisons between developmental and acquired dyslexia: Some com-B Ini nin on A. Castles and M. Coltheart (1993). Reading and Writing, 8,443-451.

li, K.8. (1988). Explaining the Differences between the Dyslexic and the Gar-■bn Vm iety Poor Reader: The Phonological-Core Variable-Difference Model. Jour-H|u/ l.mrning Disabilities, 21, 590-604.

I (2001). The sensory basis of reading problems. Developmental n, i tpsychology, 20, 509-534.

I ,. Poldrack, R.A., Protopapas, A., Nagarajan, S., Salz, T., Tallal, P., Merzenich, M M , < i nbricli, J.D. (2000). Disruption of the neural response to rapid acoustic stimuli

■    (n ilytlexia; evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of H(r<n> os ofthe USA, 97,13907-13912.

1)., Musso, C., Kolb, F.P., Rijntjes, M., Juptner, M., Muller, S.P., Diener, H.C.,

■    Vk>i!l> i,('.(1998). Postarałresponsestochangingtaskconditionsinpatients withcer-

■    phr IIni losions. Journal ofNeurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 65, 771-773.

1),, Baier, P.C., Diener, H.C., Kolb, F.P. (2000). Classically conditioned with-Hhnt' ii! rellcx in cerebellar patients 1. Impaired conditioned responses. Experimental Min Research, 130,453-470.

P.E., Eden, G.F., Jones, K.M., Zeffiro, T.A. (2002). Meta-analysis ofthe ^^pyłlnnul neuroanatomy of single-word reading: Method and validation. 16,765-780.

II., Mayringer, H., Raberger, T. (1999). Reading and balancińg: Evidence (hc automatization deficit explanation of developmental dyslexia. Journal of Disabilities, 32,473-478.

■|f, M , Bowers, P. (1999). The “Double-Deficit Hypothesis” for the developmental llynliMits. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91,1-24.

I . Eden, G. (2001). The cerebellum and dyslexia: perpetrator or innocent by-Hpidnr? Comment. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 512-513.


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
Scan070 70 AJ. Fawcett i R.I. Nicolson samym zapewnia naturalny postęp nauki i wzajemne przenikanie
Scan072 72 AJ. Fawcett i R.I. Nicolson American Psychiatrie Association (1994). Diagnostic and Stati
Scan044 44 AJ. Fawcett i R.I. Nicolson CO ROBI DLA NAS MÓŻDŻEK? Podnieś kubek z kawą. Wzrokowo śledz
Scan046 46 AJ. Fawcett i R.I. Nicolson normalnie. W tym przystosowywaniu się najważniejszą rolę odgr
Scan050 50 AJ.Fawcett i R.I. Nicolson Stwierdziliśmy, że około 80% badanych dzieci z grupy dyslektyc
Scan066 66 AJ. Fawcett i R.I. Nicolson empiryczny dowieść, która z hipotez jest słuszna konieczne są
Scan068 68 AJ, Fawcett i R.I. Nicolson dzieci z dysleksjąi jednocześnie z zaburzeniami uwagi znajdzi
Scan048 48 AJ. Fawcett i R.I. Nicolson równowagi pogarszało się bardzo istotnie, ale tylko w przypad
Scan064 64 AJ. Fawcett i R.l. Nicolson zinterpretować. Niemal we wszystkich przypadkach
Scan054 54 AJ. Fawcett i RJ. Nicolson Móżdżek a kryterium rozbieżności Jedną z najbardziej kontrower

więcej podobnych podstron