Russian Roulett

2010.pl/2010-09-09-musimy-poznac-prawde-dlaczego-
doszlo-do-katastrofy.html

Telegraph describes inter alia case of Mr René

Barrientos, President of Bolivia, who „was killed in 1969
when his helicopter crashed in Arque. Rumours persist
that it may have been shot down (...)”

Barthélemy Boganda, first Prime Minister of the

Central African Republic autonomous territory, was
killed in a mid-air explosion in 1959 just days before he
was poised to become the first president of the
independent CAR.

– Dr John Garang de Mabior, Vice President of

Sudan, died in 2005 after the Ugandan presidential Mi-
172 helicopter he was flying in crashed while on the way
back from a secret meeting which he had not told his
government about. Six of his colleagues and seven
Ugandan crew members were also killed in the accident,
which was blamed on poor weather conditions. However
there are doubts about the truth of this, and even the
Ugandan President suspected "external factors".

However the most interesting air disaster

concerning presidents are probable assassinations of Mr
Jaime R. Aguilera, President of Ecuador, who was killed

under circumstances similar to Kaczynski – he was flying
along with his wife and military leaders. Completely like
now in Russia, pilot was blamed of controlled flight into
terrain. However many factors indicate, that external
forces had took part in the air disaster, because of plans
to develop the hydrocarbon sector, which would have
threatened US interests or because he was strengthening
ties with the Soviet Union.

However not only the motives but circumstances

– probably normal, common bomb exploded on the board
make assassination the most possible case.

According to Mr Marek Strassenburg, Hamburg

University of Technology, inventor, designer of one of
the earliest 3D navigation systems, head of Strategic
Analyses Department in Harman Becker Inc., there were
9 notable catastrophes of presidential aircraft since 1945.
6 of those were assassinations.

http://smolensk-

Other words according to statistics there is a

probability of 66% that it was an assassination in
Smolensk.

Moreover Poland is probably the only country in

the world, where presidential aircraft can be cared by
another country – a foe in the international politics,
historical enemy for last 1000 years.

Only in Poland, presidential aircraft could be

technically ministered by Russia. It was a Tupolev-
154M, produced in Samara (Kyubishevo), USSR in 1990
(it does not mean that it was too old airplane – for
example Germany chancellor Mrs. Angela Merkel, flies
on the board of two much older Airbus A-310, inherited

1
0

from Interflug, East German Airlines), last generally
modernized in December 2009, which made it one of the
best-equipped Tupolevs in the history. However, this
modernization was carried out not for example in Israel,
as it could be, but in Russia, Samara. Another Polish Tu-
154M, a twin of crashed, is still in a facility in Samara,
undergoing an overhaul.

However work of Russians engineers could not

bring out a catastrophe if they were working correctly,
because they have all necessary international licenses,
powers, dozens years of experience concerning
production and servicing of the type.

Other words, if work of the Russian experts in

Poland could had brought out an air disaster, it was a
sabotage, so an assassination.

It was not an accident, according to Mr Gene

Poteat, electrical engineer and a retired CIA scientific
intelligence officer, who served abroad in London,
Scandinavia, the Middle East and Asia, a president of the
Association of Former Intelligence Officers (AFIO),
writing and lecturing on intelligence matters and teaches
at The Institute of World Politics.

“Times change but the ways countries hide

unquestionable acts of genocide remain the same. And
attempts to force acknowledgement of, or to
commemorate, such acts can trigger desperate,
sometimes bizarre acts of revenge or disavowal.” – wrote
Mr Poteat in his report about the Smolensk Air Disaster.

As it is already stated above, there is in Warsaw,

in structure of 36

Special Transport Aviation Regiment

warranty repairs carrying out Russian specialists team of

1
1

Joint Stock Company “Aviacor” Aviation Enterprise,
Samara.

Of course, it could be a coincidence that the only

aircraft serviced by the Russians, was the only aircraft in
whole regiment having in-flight failures. But these
failures were rather strange, because concerned aircraft
systems – on first sight not related to each other, however
this is not the most striking detail concerning Polish Air
Force flight 101 – as presidential flight had been
numbered.

However everything above can be summed as a

piece of speculations, fuelling thousands of conspiracy
theories. Nevertheless there are also thousands of pieces
of evidence, that will be described in this publication.
Before this fact one thing should be analyzed – rescue
operation after the catastrophe had happened in
Smolensk.

Normally, when air disaster takes place, there is

only one quarry in first minutes – to rescue as much
human beings, as it is possible.

According to British journal of anaesthesia first

medical aid, especially basic cardiopulmonary
resuscitation should be applied in 10-12 minutes. Else
there is no chance to survive for example after an air
disaster, if you only lose of consciousness, or for
example cessation of breathing will appear. These are
typical diagnoses after each serious transport accident.

However after Smolensk Air Disaster there

was no any ambulance called to the scene. It means,
that in muddy forest, where had crashed Polish
presidential aircraft nobody was going to rescue the
passengers...

1
2

According to Russian Interstate Aviation

Committee (MAK) of Commonwealth of Independent
States in Moscow, highest Russian aviation authority,
which is conducting an investigation after the air disaster,
it took only 14 minutes to surround place around the
wreckage by a group of 180 soldiers and secret service
officers. It would be impossible to be performed on
Saturday morning, outside the city, in soppy terrain,
without prior knowledge about the air disaster. Other
words Russian services should know, that Polish
presidential aircraft would crash, before it crashed. They
should be waiting in full readiness.

Lots of data concerning this operation gives a film

taken using a mobile phone by a witness on the disaster
scene, just after 180 people group coming.
However sound track of the movie is not similar to
typical sounds of rescue operation, but rather to an
execution.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9WEFQNqBMM

For example around 50sec. “Don’t kill us, I beg”
statement in Polish language is audible. Farther run of the
recording brings sound of racking and 3 noisy gunshots,
as well as some commands and exclamations. There are 3
outlines of people walking visible behind elements of the
aircraft, as well as one person in a squatting and one
outsider – old man, who could be a witness.
On the movie, among several voices, a begging voice
belongs to a women. It is only possible for her to be a
passenger or a flight attendant. However a timbre of the
voice seems to be identical to speeches of the only
women, who had been travelling in the fore compartment
of the aircraft, although it could not be confirmed clearly.

1
3

Also an author of the recording induces some sounds. No
medical service is visible on the recording – no
ambulances or helicopters, characteristic for search and
rescue operation after an air disaster.

According to Mr Antoni Macierewicz, Member of

Parliament and former head of Military Counter-
Intelligence Service of Poland, the film described above
is authentic, which is confirmed officially by Polish
Military Attorney Office, as well as Internal Security
Agency. It is also confirmed that sound track of the film
was not modified.

According to Macierewicz it was possible that it

was a murder, but it is also possible, that the shots were a
kind of deterring a people coming to the place of the air
disaster. (

http://smolensk-2010.pl/2010-09-04-

macierewicz-kontrolerzy-winni-katastrofy-tu-
154m.html

However statement “Don’t kill us” make only

first half of Mr Macierewicz statement possible.

According to Mr Macierewicz the Polish

prosecutors are not interested in examining of the
recording examination.

Author of the recording had not been interrogated

yet. Nevertheless, other sources evidence the he was
already murdered in Kiev.

According to weekly “Najwyzszy Czas”, the

Polish Intelligence Agency got high number of photos
from Smolensk, including photos of body of president
Lech Kaczynski taken at 14:52, so before official time of
his body localisation (16:00). According to Polish
intelligence officers quoted by “Najwyzszy Czas” Polish
president’s body was massacred post mortem.

1
5

1.2 Background

Not only last 500 years of history of Russia, but

also last 11 years of Col. Vladimir Putin’s dominance
show clearly, that assassinations and crimes underpin
whole mechanism of state structure. They condition as
well international politics strategy, as interior politics of
heavy-hand, eternal principle of Russia.

It is 1

of November 2006, Lt.-Col. Alexander

Valterovich Litvinenko is eating sushi in one of the
London restaurants, he does not yet know, that his days
are already numbered.
Suddenly he feel ill and becomes hospitalized.

Several hours ago, according to Col. Oleg

Gordiyevski, he visited ex-Russian agent Andrey
Lugovoi. In a house of Mr Lugovoi, Litvinenko met a
man introducing him selves as Vladimir. He did not say
many words, but strongly urged Mr Litvinenko to drink a
cap of tea. It was probably the last cap of tea for Mr
Litvinenko. He was poisoned and became the first
confirmed victim of Polonium-210, lethal isotope.
According to British doctors, he was murdered and it was
the beginning on nuclear terrorism era. Mr Litvinenko
was dying over 3 weeks, having symptoms of creeping
dose.

http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2006/11/25/obituarios/1
164449771.html

It is clearly evidenced, that polonium, which killed Lt.-
Col. Litvinenko, flew Great Britain from Moscow.
(

http://www.litvinenko.org.uk/map_en.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zofia_Leśniowska

His death is the first case of confirmed death cased by
polonium, but not the first literally. For example, a
journalist Mr Yuri Shchekochikhin (2003) and KGB
defector Mr Nikolay Khokhlov (1957) were poisoned
using not Polonium, but Thallium, according to Mr Alex
Goldfarb.

Please notice, that a death of Lt.-Col. Alexander

Litvinenko (who openly stated that, Col. Vladimir Putin,
president of Russian Federation is responsible for his
nuclear poisoning.) was confirmed and evidenced, by
Scotland Yard assassination, politically motivated, cased
by his investigation concerning a murder of Mrs. Anna
Politkovskaya, killed in Russia, Russian journalist. It is
said that she was the 17

antigovernment writer killed

during Col. Putin rules. But that is not truth – he was the
91

journalists killed since 1999. Please notice that a date

of her murder was probably not a coincidence. Mrs.
Politkovskaya died on the 7

of October 2006 – just on

the 54

birthday of Col. Vladimir Putin, president of

Russian Federation, who Mrs. Politkovskaya criticized
openly. That is why her death could be a kind of birthday
gift for president.

What was the reason of that manslaughter – Mrs.

Politkovskaya was shout in an elevator of block of flats,
she was living in, a gun and scales had been found next
to her body – was it her demeanour, so problematic for
Col. Putin? Lt.-Col. Litvinenko, ex-KGB officer, leaving
in London, who was also openly criticized Col. Putin,
tried to investigate this affair. He was killed.

But please notice, that analyzing only murder of

Mrs. Politkovskaya is not enough to describe a scale of
manslaughters in Col. Putin’s Russia.

Col. Putin became a prime minister during Mr

Boris Yeltsin presidency in 1999.

In this year not many journalist were killed – only

9, but this number was not as high probably due to lack
of power concerning Col. Putin, who did not became a
president yet.

On the 8

of August 1999, he was sworn in as a

prime minister.

Only 12 days after, a Russian journalist Mr Ludov

Loboda was killed in Kyubishev, Siberia.

The next homicide took place much closer to a

Kremlin, Mr Christopher Reese was in Moscow on the
27

of September 1999. Moreover, it was not a last

killing of journalists on an outset of Col. Putin’s era. On
the 27

of October 1999, Chechen Supyan Ependiyev

died in a crossfire – according to official version. Please
notice that it was a time, when already hung in a balance
2

Chechen Conflict. Two days after, under the same

circumstances, died Mr Shamil Gigayev and Ramzan
Mezhidov – TV workers.

Col. Putin was hoarding day-by-day, finally

becoming a president. Until however he managed this,

next people died. From hundreds of years the Kremlin
has been a place of intrigues. Under the rules of
Romanov dynasty, just before their falling down,
Rasputin was directly manipulating whole tsar family, he
became the real sovereign of not only Russia, but also
unimaginable fortune, including high shares in a power
of United States – for example in American railway,
owned partly by Russian tsar. After this period Russia
became an arena of one of the most amazing and most
brutal games in the history of world. Revolutions of
Lenin, who was carried by Germans in plumbed wagon,
like a plague. Number of civil wars, murders, turnovers
brought on a pedestal a Red Tsar – Georgian cacique Mr
Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin. During his rules Gen.
Wladyslaw Sikorski, prime minister on exile of Republic
of Poland during the Second World War was killed in a
assassination in Gibraltar air disaster, on the 4

of July

1944. As it appeared days after, although the
manslaughter had taken place over the British territory, it
had been carried out by the Russians. Daughter of Gen.
Sikorski, Mrs. Zofia Lesniowska, had been kidnapped by
the Russians and sent by them to Stalin (who finally
redirected her to a concentration camp in Siberia), via
Cairo, when she left her bracelet (according to historian,
Dariusz Baliszewski and photos presented by him:

The same air disaster, which caused Gen. Stalin to

assassinate Polish leader, managed probably also Col.
Putin. But before he was able to kill Polish president (if
even did not kill, please notice, that he had great
spectrum of forces and utilities to do it), he had to kill
many another people – completely like Stalin, and

benefited help of Yeltsin, completely like Stalin used
Lenin. In dead history – as proclaims an old saying –
repeats itself permanently.

That four manslaughters was moreover not only

during Col. Putin’s brutal way to the presidency of a
great superpower.

On the 1

of February 2000 Mr Vladimir Yatsina,

a journalist of ITAR-TASS – one of the biggest Russian
press agencies, with over 100 years history, was
kidnapped and then killed in Chechnya. 9 days after Mrs.
Ludmila Zamana, was killed in a homicide in Samara, the
same city were Polish 101 was contracted 9 years earlier
and modernized 10 years later.

On the 9

of March Mr Artyom Borovik,

publisher and journalist was probably killed on
Sheremetyevo International Airport (UUEE, SVO) near
Moscow.

Then Mrs. Luisa Arzhieva, Russian reporter, was

killed in a crossfire in Chechnya.

On the 17

of April 2000, journalist Oleg

Polukeyev was killed.

On the 8

of May 2000, Col. Vladimir Putin

finally became a president of Russia. This was a time,
when a great powerful wave of crime, shaken Russia.

Only 5 days later, on the 13

of May 2000 Mr

Alexander Yefremov, died in Chechnya. Then, on 16

July 2000, another journalist, Mr Igor Domnikov,
working in Novaya Gazeta, he died in a car crash, cased
by a paid murderer. Contractor was never punished.

On the 26

of July Mr Sergei Novikov of Radio

Vesna, Smolensk. He was shot in a contract killing in
stairwell of his block of flats.

But not murders of journalists, but another case

became an inglorious symbol of Col. Putin’s Era. On the
12

of August 2000, explosion shock the deck of Oscar-

II class nuclear-powered cruise missile submarine K-114
Kursk. It sank down on the Barents Sea with all, 118-
people crew. Everybody died, due to lack of effective
rescue operation.

Any rescue operation did not start in 24 hours,

after Kursk had sank, because Russian Navy officers
fought that about 200 kilograms TNT – force explosion,
had been a part of their exercises.

When the Kursk felt to the bottom, a buoy,

marking she’s position should be automatically released,
but this system was probably turned off, due to a risk of
release of the buoy during high g-force manoeuvres of
Kursk and detecting she by “an enemy”.

When some part of submarine crew had a chance

to survive, but British, Norwegian and American, offers
of help were rejected by president, Col. Vladimir Putin.
Russian government had been affirming that Russian
rescuers had a contact with crew and that accident had
taken place not on the 12

, but on the 13

of August.

When on the 17

of August 2000, 5 days after

catastrophe finally British and Norwegian rescuers were
admitted to the submarine by Col. Putin, all of the 108-
people crew were death.

After the accident head of special commission,

investigating causes of the Kursk tragedy became
president, Col. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin.

On the 21

of September 2000, Mr Iskander

Khatloni, from Free Europe Radio, Tajik journalist also
was killed outside his block of flats on the night.

Probable motive was his work concerning the human
rights problem in Chechnya, occupied, by the Russians.

On the 3

of October Mr Sergei Ivanov, from

Lada-TV, was shot in front of his block of flats, a
favourites place to kill journalists (for example Mrs.
Politkovskaya) in Col. Putin’s Russia.

On the 18

of October Mr Georgy Garibyan, Park

TV, was shot in Rostov-on-Don, Russia. Two days after
this time another journalist and TV worker, Mr Oleg
Goryansky was probably killed. He was a reporter
working under wildly understood problematic of freedom
and human rights.

On the 21

of October, three days after Mr

Garibyan, Mr Raif Abyashev, journalist and
photographer died in a homicide.

On the 3

of November 2000 Mr Sergei Loginov,

also from Lada TV was probably killed.

Farther, on the 20

of November, Mr Pavel

Asaulchenko, a camera operator of Austrian TV, died in
Moscow. It was contract killing that is why conviction of
murderer is only apparent.

On the 23

of November, Reuter’s camera

operator, Mr Adam Tepsurkayev died in a war crime in
Chechnya.

On the 28

of November, already not

professionally active Nikolai Karmanov died. He was
retired, but there was a hearsay in Russia, that he led
private investigation, concerning a crime of another
journalist. His homicide took place in Lyubim, Russia.

On the 23

of December 2000 Mr Valery

Kondakov, photographer was killed in Armavir, near
Sochi. He was a freelance journalist.

Year 2001 seemed to be very calm – started by

only four brutal homicides. On the 1

of February 2001,

Mr Eduard Burmagin was killed. Then on 24

February Mr Leonid Grigiriev – also a journalist, and
also murdered. On the 8

of March, Mr Andiei

Pivovarov had been killed. On the 31

of March Mr Oleg

Dolgantsev.

On the 17

of May 2001 Mr Vladimir Kirsanov,

Russian publisher and journalists had been killed in
Kurgan, Russia.

On the 2

of June, another journalist Mr Victor

Popkov died after over two months of fighting for life in
a hospital near Moscow, after crossfire in Chechnya.

Then on the 11

of September 2001, Mr Andrei

Sheiko died in a homicide. There is extremely less of
data concerning this manslaughter.

On the 19

of September 2001, Mr Eduard

Markevish was shot in back by a contract killer. He was
editor, publisher and journalist.

On the 5

of November 2001 Mrs. Elina

Voronova, a journalist was murdered.

On the 16

of November 2001 Mr Oleg Vedenin,

a journalist was murdered.

On the 21

of November 2001 Mr Alexander

Babaikin, a journalist was murdered.

On the 1

of December 2001 Mr Boris Mityurev,

a journalist was murdered. This homicide entered a
period – year 2001, but not an Era of Col. Vladimir
Putin, and not a period of journalist killing.

Freezing January 2002, also was started by brutal

homicide of journalist – Mrs. Svetlana Makarenko.

On the 4

of March 2002, Mr Konstantin

Pogodin, a journalist was murdered.

On the 8

of March 2002, Mrs. Natalya Skryl

journalist with Nashe Vremya newspaper was killed.

On the 31

of March 2002 Moscow News

journalist Mr Valery Butayev was brutally murdered in
the capital of Russian Federation, not far a way from
Kremlin.

On the 1

of April 2002, Mr Sergei Kalinovsky

editor living in Moscow died in Smolensk, in a homicide.

On the 4

of April Mr Vitaly Sakhn-Vald,

journalist and camera operator was murdered.

On the 25

of April 2002 Mr Leonid Shevchenko,

journalist died in homicide in Volgograd.

On the 29

of April 2002 Mr Valery Ivanov,

journalist, publisher and editor was killed in Samara,
Russia.

Although April of 2002 seems to be very tragic,

only after analyzing not only journalists’ murders. On the
28

of April 2002 crashed helicopter Mi-8, which

governor of Krasnoyarsk Country, Russia Gen.
Alexander Ivanovich Lebied’ was killed.

This hero of Afghan War, and than Ist Chechen

Conflict appeared as a votary of president Mr Boris
Yeltsin. Then after he was expelled from Kremlin by Mr
Yeltsin, he won a vote in Krasnoyarsk country, where he
became a governor. New Russian leader Col. Putin was
openly criticized by Gen. Lebied’, who did not show his
friendship or even acceptation both for Mr Yeltsin as
Col. Putin’s government members. Russian prosecution
by some coincidence alleged him embezzlements of
public money, including hunting polar bears from a board

of Ambulance Service Helicopter. This objections were
not well evidenced, that is why investigation had been
continued. Gen. Lebied’ was not scared to criticize Col.
Putin. Suddenly he died in hospital, after air disaster in
2002. Although it was a helicopter – a Soviet-constructed
Mil Mi-8, the circumstances where quite similar, to the
10

of April 2010, disaster near Smolensk. The

helicopter crashed and damaged in poor visibility after it
had contacted a ground-based energetic line. Gen.
Lebied’ posthumously, completely like Mr Kaczynski
was suspected to force landing on a pilot. But many facts
indicated supposition of an assassination of Lebied’, that
is why his death indicated many conspiracy theories.
(

http://www.przeglad-

tygodnik.pl/index.php?site=artykul&id=1784

in-russia.org/journalists/index/

On the 20

of May 2002 journalist Mr Alexander

Plotnikov was murdered.

On the 6

of June 2002 journalist Mr Pavel

Morozov died in a homicide.

On the 25

of June 2002, a publisher, editor and

founder of local TV and Radio in Vladivostok, Mr Oleg
Sedinko, died in contract killing.

On the 20

of July 2002 Mr Nikolai Razmolodin,

general director of local TV and Radio company in
Ulyanovsk was murdered.

On the 21

of July 2002, Mrs. Maria Lisichkina

was killed in a homicide.

On the 27

of July 2002, not a journalist but

spokesperson of Moscow Region Governor was
murdered.

Then on the 18

of August Mr Nikolai Vasiliev, a

journalist was murdered.

On the 25

of August Fin origin, retired editor

and journalist, Mr Paavo Voutilainen, was murdered in
Karelia, Russia.

On the 4

of September 2002, according to

Glasnost Defense Foundation, a publisher Mr Leonid
Kuznetsov was murdered.

On the 26

of September, a British journalist, Mr

Roderick “Roddy” Scott, died in crossfire.

On the 2

of October, Mrs. Yelena Popova was

murdered.

On the 19

of October, Mr Leonid Plotnikov was

murdered.

On the 23

of October, Chechen partisans carried

out an attack on the Dobrovka Theatre, Moscow during a
show. All the people inside have been taken hostage. On
the 26

of October, after three days on negotiations Col.

Putin’s commando not calculating victims threw on the
theatre with 922 innocent civilians inside, based on a mix
of fentanil and 3-Methylfentanyl combat gas, killing
about 300 people, according to unofficial statistics.

Please notice, that the government dependent of

Col. Putin did not send ambulances to injured people, but
transported them to hospitals by buses. Governmental
service did not also inform doctors what kind of gas had
been used by commando that is why it was very difficult
to introduce life-saving treatment. This clearly shows,
that a target of Col. Putin was probably not to increase a
number of victims to shock the world, showing high
number of killed, which he was going to attribute to
Chechen terrorists. After a fault of government service
was revealed by the world media, number of victims was

probably more than twice undervalued, by central
authorities of Russian Federation.

A head of special commission investigating case

of Dobrovka became Col. Vladimir Putin.

On the 21

of November local journalist, Mr

Dmitry Shalayev was killed in Kazan, Russia.

On the next years, authority of Col. Vladimir

Putin was so strong, that he did not have to be afraid of
opposition. In media rarely appear now plunged relations
with the Chechen war, rarely they were also shown on
the West of Europe and in USA, because more powerful
Russia of Col. Putin became once again equal both for
European superpowers, as for the USA.

In this time critics of president Col. Vladimir

Putin decreased radically in Russian media. Probably that
is why also a number of journalist’s murder was
permanently decreasing, but it was still rather high.

On the 7

of January 2003 Mr Vladimir

Sukhomlin, Moscow editor, journalist and blogger had
been killed by a contract killer, under very unclear
circumstances.

On the 11

of January in Moscow had been killed

a sport commentator and journalist. We can say that it
certainly was not a political murder, in contrast to farther
murders, including one, that took place on the 18

April,

when Mr Dmitry Shvets, publisher, editor and deputy
director of independent, whose TV station TV-21 had
“received a multiple threats for its reporting on
influential local politicians in Northwestern Russia.

Before him on the 21

February 2003, Mr Sergei

Verbitsky, a publisher was murdered.

On the 3

of July in Moscow very well-know

journalist, politician, publisher and editor, Mr Yuri
Shchekochikhin, probably was murdered, before his
travel to the USA. He suddenly suffered on an
anaphylactic shock, due to unexplained allergic reaction.
He was investigation scandals in FSS (ex-KGB), where
Col. Putin had been the head time before. Mr Yuri
Shchekochikhin was a deputy editor in Novaya Gazeta,
Moscow, where inter alia Mrs. Anna Politkovskaya had
been working.

On the 4

of July journalist with French agency,

Mr Ali Astamirov, missed in Nazran, probably kidnapped
and killed.

On the 18

of July 2003 Mr Alikhan Guliyev,

freelance TV worker, showing the problems of
Ingushetia Republic, Russia, was murdered in Moscow.

On the 10

of August, Mr Martin Kraus was

murdered, when he had been travelling to Chechnya.

This year, during summer holiday Russian press

seemed to be very calm and polite – please notice that for
month any journalist did not killed.

Only on the 9

of October, a journalist who had

been shot about one year earlier died in a hospital. Then
on the 24

of October Mr Alexei Bakhtin,

businessperson, former journalist was murdered.

After a first two years of dominance in Russia,

Col. Putin became as strong as he could be called, a
dictator. This former secret service head, in a very short
time subordinated himself whole the state apparatus,
including judicature, media, interior, secret service,
military power, local administration and diplomatic

services. There were nearly no opposition, like in
Western democratic countries, and lack independent
business.

The most characteristic example of Col. Putin

politics concerning private business was a case of Mr
Mikhail Khodorkovsky, at one time the richest person in
Russia and one of the 16 wealthiest people in the world, a
philanthropist. He repeatedly criticized Col. Putin’s
politics. On the 25

of October 2003, he was charged in

very controversial process in May of 2008 proclaimed
guilty of frauds concerning privatization. Please notice,
that in Russia privatization processes are regulated by
central authorities, that is why this type unilateral process
could have only political basis and can be only a kind of
retribution.

When he was under arrest this situation had

forced Mr Khodorkovsky to declaim function of CEO in
his own company Yukos, 3 years later this oil
corporation became bankrupt. Mr Khodorkovsky is
currently doing draconic porridge of 8 years in boot
camp, central Siberia. Mr Khodorkovsky can feel very
lucky, because - although Putin’s judgment of
condemnation send him to a kind of concentration camp,
relict of Soviet Union, well known by Western reader
fascinating book “The Gulag Archipelago” of Mr
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn – he is still alive. Thousands of
another people did not have such chance.

Murders of journalists did not ever stop even for a

long while, but temporarily there was nobody to kill.

On the 30

of October, however died Mr Yury

Burgov, a journalist and long time after on the 25

December 2003 Mr Pyotr Bebenko, but they, although

murdered were rather only local than political-involved
pressmen.

On the 1

of February 2004, Mr Yerim Sukhanov,

died in Archangielsk.

Farther on the 23

of March probably, a camera

operator Mr Farit Urazbayev.

On the 2

of May 2004, died in a homicide

journalist Shangysh Mongush.

On the 9

of May died Chechen President Mr

Amhat Kadyrov, who was assassinated in a stadium in
Grozny, Chechnya during a Victory Day (anniversary of
the end of World War II), as a result of the explosion
explosives hidden in the VIP tribune. Mr Kadyrov’s die
absorbed Col. Putin and Russian authorities with
situation in Chechnya (Kadyrov was supported by Col.
Putin, was the Russian Federation Gold Star Hero), that
is why a number of journalists killed in Russia was
decreasing, disturbance in Chechnya and Caucasus was
that time increasing, and few month later led to a tragedy.

Before the most tragic attack in history of Russian

Federation and a short time after the attack, when
Russian authorities were absorbed situation in separatist
republics, not many journalist ware dying, but much of
they can be described as real Kremlin enemies .

On the 9

of June Mr Paul Klebnikov, famous

journalist, editor-in-chef of newly established Forbs,
Russia was killed by a contract killer in Moscow.

On the 1

of July 2004 in St. Petersburg was

killed Mr Maxim Maximov, whose body has never been
found.

On 17

of July 2004 Mr Pail Peloyan, editor from

Moscow was murdered.

On the 3

of August 2004, a journalist and writer,

Cossack nationalist, was killed near Moscow.

of August 2004 Mrs. Svetlana Shishkina, a

journalist from Kazan, Tatarstan died in a homicide.

Nevertheless, the 24

of April was much more

tragic – on the night 90 people died in two serious air
disaster cased by a terrorist attack.

At 22:40, a Tupolev-154B-2 of Sibir Airlines took

off Moscow-Domodedovo (UUDD/DME) for a flight to
Sochi-Adler, Russia (URSS/AER), with 46 people on the
board.

A high explosive material hexogen (RDX) was

detected in crashed Tupolev.

Air disaster took place, in the same time with a

Volga-Aviaexpress Tupolev 134, which departed
Domodedovo 10 minutes earlier. According to FSF, “It
appeared that the explosives had been carried aboard by
a female passenger. Two female suicide bombers arrived
at Moscow at 19:45 on the same day on a flight from
Makhachkala in the company of another two Chechens.
They had taken aside on arrival and were handed to a
police captain in charge of antiterrorist precautions, but
they were released without apparently having been
searched. After bribing a Sibir Airlines employee in
charge of check-in and boarding one of the women was
able to bypass security and get on board the Tu-154.”

Please notice that terrorists had not any problem

with getting into the board of two aircraft. Please also
notice that miraculously both aircraft crashed at the same
time – at 22:53, although nothing indicates, that
explosive materials could be fire directly, because places

of catastrophes occur far each other and hundredths of
kilometres from departure airport.

This is not a place to accuse anybody, but due to

these accidents Col. Putin’s Russia got a pretext to
increase tempo of operations in Chechnya, where
situation became as hot as a boric acid, when it is boiled
in a test glass.

On the 1

of September 2004, as every year in

inter alia Russian schools, a school season started. It was
not only a time of education re-starting, but also a
massacre in Beslan, North Osetia, a breakaway region of
Russian Federation. Terrorist commando was a part of
forces of Chechen cacique, and now field warlord, Mr
Shamil Salmanovich Basayev aka Abdullah Shamil Abu-
Idris. It is rather unbelievable to this attack be inspirited
by Russian Authorities of Col. Putin, but as reprehensible
in the light of international humanitarian law and human
rights should be described government forces action,
which bring to children rather death, than freedom.

Assault was carried out by the same troops, those

two years earlier in Dobrovka, Moscow. Nevertheless,
this time they did not use combat gas, but rocket flame-
throwers type Shmel, according to Mr Nikolai Shepel,
deputy attorney general of Russian Federation. However,
Mr Shepel noted, that not fire, but reek missiles were
used.

All the same – it does not change the fact, that

due to the Russian commando about 380 people
(including 156-180 children) had been at least killed.
Farther 700 people had been injured. Please conversely
notice, that about 200 people, in most children were
considered as missing, their fate is still not clear, that is

why a number of killed people could be much higher.
Seeing the fact, there number of victims in Dobrovka,
Moscow (2002) had been being undercut, there is no
indication, that such practices did not be carried out in
forgotten by God and people Osetia, situated about 1200
miles from Moscow.

In this place it is necessary to signalize, that both

after attack in Dobrovka, as in Beslan there was a huge
disinformation campaign carried out in Russian media, in
order to conceal some of the circumstances and to
understate number of the victims.

During action in Dobrovka, Mrs. Anna

Politkovskaya, independent journalist tried to not allow
on bloodshed, playing the role of negotiator. Although it
was permitted for her in Moscow, during a flight to
Beslan she was poisoned on a board, probably drinking
tea. However, in contrast to Mr Litvinenko did not die,
because the tea was not radioactive, but was "only"
hospitalized. However, her hours were already numbered
that time.

Attack in Beslan became a pretext for Col.

Vladimir Putin to disclose plans of his reforms, aiming
radical strengthening of president’s power in Russia,
especially concerning internal and defense politics. He
announced that procedure of Parliament elections would
be changed, as well as president will nominate governors,
instead of democratic elections. Please notice, that Col.
Putin probably tried to exploit tragedy to increase his
own competence.

Then on the 18

of September 2004, Mr Vladimir

Prithin, TV journalist and editor was murdered.

Year 2005 was one of the calmest of the Col.

Putin’s Era, concerning murders of journalists. Reasons
are plural. The vast majority of Col. Putin’s critics in
media already left Russia or they were killed.
Alternatively, they bent under the pressure of punishable
threats (in contrast to Mrs. Politkovskaya) and ceased to
write critically about Col. Putin.

Nearly nobody had this time courage to still

criticize Col. Putin. That is why number of murders
decreased radically.

Moreover, only a few criticizing journalists still

remain working and alive. That is why protection of the
Committee to Protect Journalists became effective.
Marginalized, did not be formidable for Russian
president.

On the 23

of May – Mr Pavel Makayev, reporter

from Rostov-on-Don was killed, but not due to political
essays, but probably photographing night street racing,
organized by Russian mafia.

On the 28

of July an exception was made –

politician journalist from Dagestan, Mr Magomed
Varisov was executed near his house. He had received
threats before murder. He died and the case is still not
clearly explained despite of engagement of the
Committee to Protect Journalists.

On the 31

of August 2005 a journalist, Mr

Alexander Piterky had been murdered. Three days after
this time another journalist, Mr Vladimir Pashutin, of
Smolensk was probably murdered.

This year only Mrs. Kira Lezhneva, a reporter

died in a homicide.

On the 8

of January 2006 Mr Vagif Kochetkov,

press worker of Trud was killed.

On the 26

of February Mr. Ilia Zimin, NTV

Russia journalist, was murdered in his flat in Moscow.

On the 4

of May, Mrs. Oksana Teslo, a journalist

died, after her summerhouse near Moscow went up in
flames, in was a homicide.

On the 14

of May, Mr Oleg Barabyshkin,

director of radio station in Chelabynsk was murdered.

On the 23

of May, Mr Vyacheslav Akatov,

reporter of Business Moscow TV was murdered.

On the 25

of June, a camera operator Mr Anron

Kretenchuk was murdered in Rostov-on-Don.

On the 25

of July a journalist, Mr Yevgeny

Gerasimeko was murdered.

On the 31

of July Mr Anatoly Kozulin, a retired

freelance journalist died in a homicide.

On the 8

of August 2006 Mr Alexander Petrov,

editor-in-chef a magazine in Omsk was murdered with
his family, during his holiday near Altai, Russia

On the 17

of August 2006, Mrs. Elina

Ersenoyeva, Chechen press reporter, missed in Grozny,
Chechnya.

On the 13

of September 2006 Mr Vyacheslav

Plotnikov, of local TV in Voronezh was probably
murdered.

On the 7

of October 2006 in an elevator of her

house in Moscow, was murdered by a contract killers,
Mrs. Anna Politkovskaya, a freelance, political journalist,
human rights worker and famous writer, author of inter
alia bestsellers A Dirty War: A Russian Reporter in
Chechnya (2001) and Putin’s Russia (2004). She died on

We cannot say that a power of Putin decreased,

but it was a time when his cadence was coming to the
end. Nobody had known than, what vision of Russia
would show the present, leaving his office. Constitution
prohibits being a president in Russia longer, then two
cadencies, but in contrast to many democratic countries
after one cadence gap, Col. Putin can come back.

Than nobody knew if Col. Putin will have been

retired, make a cadence gap of politics or will try to
change constitution?

Finally, he settled on Kremlin, his subordinated

inferior from the government, Mr Dmitry Anatolevich
Medvedev.

Mr Dmitry Medvedev

www.medvedev.kremlin.ru

(All the data above from

http://journalists-

http://www.bibula.com/?p=21036

Three days after the catastrophe, most of commentators
and press agencies claimed that catastrophe was an
assassination planed by Col. Vladimir Putin. Israeli press
recalls (please notice that truthfully), that Mr Kaczynski
was allegedly hated by Kremlin, for his anti-Russian
views. On the 12

of April 2010 (two days after

Smolensk Air Disaster) Ha’aretz wrote that Russia’s
solidarity with the Polish people about the Smolensk
tragedy was ostensible.

It is clearly visible, that all the Hebrew-language

newspapers repeatedly described Mr Kaczynski’s anti-

Russian foreign policy and that he was one of most
reliable allies of USA.

Please notice, that Mr Kaczynski actively

supported Ukrainian president, Mr Viktor Yushchenko
and Georgian leader Mr Mikhail Saakashvili in their
conflicts with Col. Putin’s administration.

Control
panel of
anty-
aircraft
rocket
launcher
Grom.
These
Polish

launchers were delivered to Georgia during their military
conflict with Russia, on request of Mr Lech Kaczynski.
Grom can be spaced in only 15s, and is able to kill
supersonic aircraft.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/
b/bb/MSPO2007-09.jpg/300px-MSPO2007-09.jpg

Ha’aretz was very surprised, words of ambassador

of Republic of Poland, Mrs. Aganeshka Magdzyak-
Mishevskoy (Polish writing: Angnieszka Magdziak-
Miszewska), who stated: “I’m truly surprised the
international press speculates such allegations, but in
Poland nobody believes in a conspiracy theory nor

accuses Russia for what happened.” The full interview
was published by Ha’aretz April 12

. She stated that she

believed in Medvedev and Putin’s sincerity when they
spoke about their grief for the disaster victims.

The first channel to mention the possibility of

Putin’s involvement was the second ITV channel.
“Kaczynski was a toreador’s red muleta for Putin and
Medvedev” said the international news department editor
Arad Nir, on the 10

of April in the evening.

A day after Mr Kaczynski death, on the 11

April the printed press heavily speculated conspiracy
theories. “The Polish, who are used to be surrounded by
enemies, can hardly believe that their political and
military elite disappeared as a result of an accident
caused by a tragic set of circumstances, technical failures
and human mistakes” wrote Yediot Ahronot paper.

Maariv, stated as following: “The smell of

elimination. (…) Moscow promised to investigate, and
Putin became the chief of the inquiry commission, but it’s
less than probable the truth will be unveiled”.
According to the political analyst, Mr Ynet Atila
Somfalvi, Mr Kaczynski “could never bear with Russians
and now they are the main suspects”.

Even religious papers, for example Be-Hadrei

Haredim, rarely interested in the international politics, in
very characteristic, balanced tone suggested, that: “It’s
possible that Russia and its leaders, who, saying the least,
didn’t actually like Kaczynski, are responsible for his
death.”

Radio Reshet Bet aired a talk show with many

journalists and analysts debating the true causes of

plane’s crash. Most of them accused Putin of being
involved in Kaczynski’s death.

According to Mr Gene Poteat, retired CIA officer:

(http://www.charlestonmercury.com/articles/2010/06/15/
news/doc4c17d3f5734b3292394378.txt)

However, this is a perfect place to explain one

think. Listing the journalists killed in Russia was not
however a way to mention Col. Putin as the guilty or as
the only guilty. It was necessary to show what current
situation in Russia is and how similar it is to Soviet
Union. We can believe that Russian Federation became a
Western civilization country. We can also compare Col.
Putin to Mr Stalin, as above. But the real truth is only one
– Russia is specific country and it is a great error to
observe it, just like the Great Britain, a country of low,
peace and thousands year of cultural tradition. We cannot
also look at Russia through the prism of Soviet Union,
and the thousands of people die every day. We can only
look at Russia only just like at Russia. A country with
pseudo-democratic system, so with free elections, just
like in Great Britain, but also with no any real opposition
just like Soviet Union. The country where foreign
journalists can work, just like in Great Britain, but where
nobody can feel safety - like in Soviet Union. Also
thinking about Putin’s Russia, we cannot live behind
tragedies in Beslan, Dobrovka on the Kursk, where
hundreds of people died as a fault of governing and their
services, as well as their inconceivable ruthlessness.

Please also notice, that after tragedies in Beslan,

Dobrovka, on Kursk, the head of Russian commission,
the only commission became Col. Putin. Completely just,

like after the catastrophe of Polish aircraft. The head of
Russian commission is also Col. Putin.

Dishonesty of Russian investigation institutions,

including Putin’s commission, MAK (with self-styled
Polish representative Col. Edmund Klich), prosecution is
clearly visible. That is why it is sure, that their work will
not improve the flight safety.

That is why the only possible way to improve

flight security with not counting on Russian institutions
is a careful consideration of all possible cases and
factors. Technical, men and organizational factors, as
well as a criminal (terrorism) act will be considered.
Nevertheless, before it will be possible to analyze them
objectivity it is necessary to ask on one question: qui
bono. Who benefited? Polish government, Gazprom, Col.
Putin, great Russian nation with 1000 years of history or
maybe for example Burkina Faso African republic secret
military intelligence? Qui bono?

This question is also complex, because to answer

on it, all the VIP-s on the board have to be included, but
in the light of their relations with the forces, able to case
the air disaster, which was very, very simple. Excluding
God, Allah and Jack the Ripper, only Polish and Russian
governments, as well as the terrorists should be
contemplated. Terrorist attack’s probability is however
very low, due to extremely low possibility of bombing
attack (aircraft was under the special care of security
services and soldiers) as well as lack of explosion and
lack of sign of downing by a surface to air missile.
Terrorists also have to have great problem with eventual
sabotage – they never used this method. Of course, they
also never before had used a method, they carried out

attack on the 11

of September, but any terrorists did not

have a motive. The only beneficent could be Russian and
Polish governments or other unknown
organizations/forces. For example Mr Witold S.
Michalowski (pipeline designer, engineer, editor
journalist, author of books concerning international
politics, pipeline designing and petroleum industry, chef
designer of pipelines in Nigeria and Canada, as well as
petroleum and pipe installation in Iran, Iraq, Libya, weld
technology author for the biggest European pipeline)
indicates, that potential guilty of the catastrophe could be
Russian international concern Gazprom. “Global
business syndicates are able to do everything, as
evidences history”. Mr Michalowski, one of the best
Siberia experts, recalls during Russian attack aircraft
operation, he was a witness, when two Sukhoi aircraft
attacked a group of Chechen children by combat
weapons.

According to Mr Michalowski also gen. Lebied,

Putin’s opponent could be murdered, because probably
the crew of his helicopter was not familiar with terrain,
received error flight charts, using which they should
contact energetic line, in a fog appearing every day, that
valley. Moreover, according to Mr Michalowski before
the crash a grave in Moscow, huge crucifix and
thousands of flowers were ready to bless Lebied. There
were probably, according to Mr Michalowski another
factors indicates, that that was a murder in mountains of
Krasnoyarsk – Gen. Lebied entered ambulance on his
own, well-being, but get hospital in critical condition
somehow. Moreover, local journalists investigating that

air disaster were changed and send aboard, just after had
started their private investigation.

Mr Michalowski however is very cautious with

indicating guilty of Lebied’s crash, as well as Smolensk
air disaster – he only lists the facts.

However Mr Miroslaw Kuleba (journalist,

reporter, essayist, absolvent of infrastructural engineering
faculty, correspondent during Abkhazian War 1992-
1993, Yugoslavian Conflict 1993 and 1

Chechen

Conflict 1994-1996, as well as 2

Chechen conflict

1999, author of 11 books concerning war and Russian
internal politics aspects) states, that the aircraft of Mr
Kaczynski could be downed for example by Shmel
rocket weapon.

Results of preliminary expertises published by

Russian commission, examining catastrophe of
presidential Tupolev, excluded so to say 'a priori' and
indisputably a possibility of explosion on the board of the
aircraft. However the character of damages, that the
fuselage of presidential Tu-154 suffered with, kind of
injuries to victims of the catastrophe and some
significant details, concerning preservation conditions of
objects found directly near the bodies draws myself
picture, well known for mi from Russo-Chechen war, I
saw as a journalists working with several Polish
redactions

During the first war in Chechnya in 1994-1996

years, I spend among the Chechen fighters nearly 9
month and I got to know many types of Russian weapons
used by them.

Nearly every warrior had on personal equipment

one shot, personal anti-tank rocket launcher RPG-18

“Fly” or RPG-22 “Netto”, or similar to them, also put in
short composite pipe rocket flame-thrower “Shmel”.

A weapon with Russian name RPO-A (rakhtivnyi

protivotankhovyi ogniemiot) “Shmel”, another words
rocket flame-thrower, calibre 93mm is difficult to be
classified. It as the most looks like one-shot anti-tank
rocket launcher, because from plastic container it
launches on a distance of several hounded meters not a
fire stream, how could suggest name, but a capsule with
thermo-baric missile (in other terminology volumetric). A
rule of Shmel’s missile is however similar to an effect
used in vacuum bombs: during explosion impulse of the
extremely high temperature is joined by enormous
pressure drop, destroying all alive power on the surface
of 50-80 square meters. During a hit of the capsule into a
panzer vehicle BVP, machine simply turns upside down
and burns along with the crew.

Shmel appeared extreme efficient weapon in fight

with Russian tanks and panzer vehicles. Effects of its
work whole world saw during a tragedy in Beslan:
Russian commandos used thermo-baric missiles in action
of recapturing of the children massed in school.

It exactly cased unimaginable massacre. Empty

Shmel containers were found on the roofs of the building
surrounding the school of which fire had been conducted.

Nota bene – using of “Shmels” in such action

discloses intense of the side used this murderous gun:
they were going to be as many victims, as it was possible.

Let's now come back to the wreckage of the

presidential Tu-154. Underlined is unintelligible
“disappearing” of passenger saloon, difficult in

explanation dismembered of whole fuselage section
between the cockpit and a tail.

Well, such effect is impossible in a falling down of

the machine from and altitude of barely several meters
and little speed, had not to be cased by an internal
explosion, leaving very characteristic traces in sheathing
of the aircraft.

The same effect is able to be reached during

detonating of thermo-baric capsule outside the fuselage.

In such situation aircraft, which will be inside the

vacuum formed by an explosion of fuel mixture, will be
destroyed under force of inside pressure in hermetic
board.

This kind of explosion would have as destruction

influence on passengers’ bodies. This is the essence of
the conception on which design of this weapon is based:
in a vacuum from the sprayed and detonated airborne
fuel, which burn consumes all the oxygen on the area and
forms vacuum, peoples’ bodies are parted into shreds,
due to natural interior pressure.

Identical effect brings for example decompression

of astronaut’s suit during space walk in vacuum.

One of the Chechen warriors told me about

situation in house hit by Shmel, which he finds as the
most terrible reminiscence of the war. He found
apparently undisturbed cradle with sleeping baby inside.
When he took the baby from the cover, body of the child
came to bits in his hands.

What important – the aircraft did not have to be

hit by thermo-baric weapon, which would leave traces on
the metal elements of sheathing.

Every such missile has its own auto-destroying,

activating after reaching of set distance. Detonation
could happened in a distance of even over a dozen meters
to the fuselage.

Intact would be objects, for example inside the

pockets of victim’s clothes, covered of high temperature
direct influence.

More and more details of the catastrophe indicate

suspicion of precision assassination conduction to kill
head of state.

Gloomy and possible scenario takes a shape:

various instruments to lead the catastrophe, and after the
pilot had taken hopeless attempt of leaving the deadly
trap, when the manoeuvre of re-ascent – he was hit by
rocket. It did not have to be a capsule of Shmel; it could
be stronger thermo-baric missile, with the same base of
action. It could be made on base of aviation fuel, to erase
traces of manslaughter. However cannot be removed
completely. If criminal scenario really took place, the
specialists should perform inspection of wreckage
remains again, with assumption of out of the fuselage
explosion and vacuum effect force.

Maybe targeted is exhumation and medical re-

examination of the victims’ bodies. Or maybe the answer
is on the satellite photos from the time of the accident,
still undisclosed.

Mr Kuleba reasoning is very interesting because:

1. The medical examinations of 95 bodies

had been performed without Polish
representatives by Russians.
(

http://www.rmf24.pl/raport-lech-

2. Medical examinations results are still

unavailable for Poland.
(

kaczynski-nie-zyje-2/kaczynski-
fakty/news-piotr-schramm-dziwi-mnie-
brak-protokolow-z-sekcji-
zwlok,nId,293435

3. In official preliminary report MAK stated,

that there was 100g force pressuring the
bodies, impossible to act during terrain
impact. (see:

www.MAK.ru

http://www.naszdziennik.pl/index.php?da

4. The uniforms of the generals in contrast to

the bodies survived the air disaster.
(

t=20100807&typ=po&id=po01.txt

http://www.redakcja.newsweek.pl/Tekst/Swiat/537840,K

According to Dr. Tadeusz Augustynowicz, former

LOT Polish Airlines and Air Force, military co-ordinator
of airfields in Kabul (Afghanistan) and Prague (Czech
Republic), former manager at London Heathrow Airport
there is a high possibility to be statement of Mr Kuleba
truth:

1. The aircraft wreckage is still kept by Russians.
2. The wreckage is not currently under examination

– it is deteriorating under outdoor, under
influence of water drops, wind and under
security of a soldier with gun.

3. Recording from the Air Traffic Control tower, as

well as Cockpit Voice Recorder of Russian Air
Force Ilyushin Il-76M transport aircraft are
ignored and top secret.

4. There is still no even real time of the air disaster

– there is only Russian-stated time of recording
end- the recording which is somehow 1/3 longer
then normally. This time is completely conflicted
with time of energetic line cut as well as gen.
Blasik’s watch stop.

5. Polish side did not receive black boxes.
6. All the international procedures concerning

black boxes had been broken by MAK.

7. Black boxes before by the first time copied for

Poland had been put in the safe of Gen. Anodina
and protected only by… paper seal.

8. Fragments of bodies have been finding by people

months after the catastrophe on the unprotected
scene.

9. Polish prosecution burned received from Russia

wears and uniforms.

According to Mr Michalowski very possible

motive was a sense of so-called Naimski’s report –
analyse sent to Mr Lech Kaczynski in half of March,
prepared by a group of international-known experts with
former minister Mr Piotr Naimski as a head.

Naimski indicated, that works of Mr Tusk’s

government as well as Gazprom policy is going to
subordinate Poland of Russian energy to 2037, to make
Gazprom a monopolist in Central Europe gas market,
remit USD milliard Gazprom debt to Poland, as well as
to be Russian gas transfer through Poland… free.

Kaczynski could only state, that a group of

experts lead by ex-minister is a bunch of idiots or take
some action. – stated Mr Michalowski. However, under

rules of count Bronislaw Komorowski, current president
of Republic of Poland, Poland signed unprofitable and
dangerous gas contract for 27 years. Count Komorowski
is friend of Prime Minister Mr Tusk and member of his
party, political opponent of late Mr Kaczynski.

According to Czech journalist, Mr Karel Penkava:

1. Some of disclosed facts just after the

tragedy with part of presidential plane
induce serious doubts concerning
Russians readiness and desire to co-
operation.

2. Fragments and conversations of PLF-101

with ATC, quoted by PLF-044 crew are
somehow not present in PLF-101 after
crash black box CVR recording
transcripts, received by Polish
government from Russia.

However, the article of Mr Penkava is perfect

continuation of the preface of this publication, when a
serious of Russian manslaughter had been listed.

Mr Penkava states, that many people directly

connected with the air disaster of the air disaster died,
including:

1. Professor Marek Dulinicz – chef of Polish

archaeologists expeditions, who were going to
examine the scene of the air disaster to check
weather some parts of the aircraft and bodies are
still present there. Archaeologists did not go
Smolensk.

2. Krzysztof Knyż – Polish journalist, a

correspondent and operator working in Russia.

3. Mieczyslaw Cieślar – new Polish protestants

leader (a protestant bishop Col. Adam Pilch died
in Smolensk)

To the black series described by Mr Penkava also

one murder should be add – author of movie showing
aircraft’s wreckage woman voice and shots just after the
catastrophe had been killed.

Russians dissidents group extended an open letter,

concerning Smolensk air disaster.

Several hundred thousand people already know

from the internet proclamation for the Russians, in which
Polish presidential candidate, Mr Jaroslaw Kaczynski
was able to express honestly and cordially acknowledge
those Russians, who in the most difficult for both our
nations time, shown Polish sympathy and help.

Russian authorities did not consider it

appropriate to publish text of the proclamation or answer
it. By the silence they evidenced, that all their official
word an sympathy expressions by the reason of tragic
death of president Kaczynski and accompanying him
group of people, were only empty formality and came up
not from honest heart (like some of us wanted to believe),
but due to clearly passing reasoning. Unfortunately, that
is nothing weird.

However we are surprised and seriously afraid

the investigation conduction, which had to explain
circumstances and cased of the Tu-154 catastrophe near
Smolensk. Na impression, that Russian authorities are
not interested in explaining of all the catastrophe cases

appear, and Polish authorities repeat ensuring of
Russian side full opening , nothing in fact demanding and
only waiting patiently for the materials promised by
Moscow.

It is difficult to get rid of the impression that for

the Polish government closeness to the current Russian
authorities is more important than establishing the truth
in one of the biggest national tragedy.

It seems that Polish friends have a certain naive,

forgetting that the interests of the current leadership in
the Kremlin and Russia's neighboring nations countries
are not convergent each other.

We are concerned that in a similar situation the

Polish independence as today, as tomorrow it may be
seriously threatened. We hope that Polish citizens
appreciating their freedom are able to protect it. Also in
upcoming voting.

Mr Victor Feinberg (dissident, opponent during

Czechoslovakian intervention)

Mr Alexander Bondariev (journalist and translator)

Mr Vladimir Bukovskyi (dissident of Soviet Union and

Putin’s Russia)

Mrs. Natalia Gorbanevskaya (pro-democratic activist)

Andrei Illarinov (former Putin’s advisor, now

oppositionist, economist)

The only notable international reaction is proposal

of United States Congressman, Mr Peter King, to be an
international commission founding requested by US
Congress.

ongresmen-peter-king-chce-miedzynarodowego-
sledztwa-ws-smolenska.html

Mr Peter King requests to establish international

investigation to examine cases of the air disaster.

1.3 The motive

Background section can indicate mistakenly that

only the journalists are murdered regularly in
manslaughters in Russia.

Last several years evidence perfectly authenticy

of old saying assigned for Joseph Stalin: “One killed is
tragedy, millions of killed is a statistic”.

In the millions also presidents are included, for

example president of Ukraine, Mr Victor Yushchenko,
who only by a miracle maintained live, democratic and
anty-Russian politician, who had been poisoned in 2004.

According to Dr. Michael Zimpfer of

Rudolfinerhaus clinical tests evidenced that dioxins had
been used in murder attempt.

http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S01406736096
09120

Also Dr. John Henry, toxicologist with London

St. Mary’s Hospital indicated dioxins in his analyzes.

Please however notice, that due to natural links,

based on thousand years of history without own country,
and millions of people living in diasporas all over the
world, as the best informed in the world must be fingered
the Israeli press.

Israeli people, not only are the best informed, but

also, due to their temperament respond the most quickly
and do never beat around the bush.

In contrast to press in Great Britain, Poland or

Canada, Israeli press does not believe the Russian and
authorities of Col. Vladimir Putin.

According to Israeli press, Smolensk Air Disaster

is a typical Kremlin assassination.

Ha’aretz, which is probably the best newspaper in

Israel (Israeli press would be perfect if only not so
expensive), wrote, also, “Few hours after the accident,
conspiracy theories about Putin’s involvement, based on
his tensioned relationship with Kaczynski, spread
throughout Poland”.
(http://www.jurnal.md/en/news/israeli-press-accuses-
putin-of-kaczynski-s-elimination-184453/)

“The trip to Smolensk was expected to highlight

finally admitting culpability in the massacre, after

long having blamed it on the Germans, an atrocity they
had tried to conceal for over 70 years. As for the
reception committee, it had different ideas.

wasn’t

looking forward to such an occasion. Included in this
poisonous reception brew was President Kaczynski’s
well-known public criticism of Moscow and

, a habit

that has ended the lives of others within

— and

abroad. A few discouraging Russian requirements —
such as that Kaczynski could not attend in any official
capacity — did not halt the

. Kaczynski would go

anyway on non-official, “personal” business. To

Russians, such a distinction would be meaningless, not
lessening the possible international excoriation of such
an event. A

problem

ripe for a modern, Russian solution:

a tragic, “natural” accident.

Yes. The airplane crashed at 8:41 a.m. Moscow time,
April 10, on its final approach to the Smolensk airport, in
bad weather, killing all 96 people on board. Practically
everyone in

Poland

, and many others around the world,

strongly suspected that

, especially

, must

have had a hand in the crash. Not an unusual claim since
the same accusations followed the poisoning and/or
mysterious “natural” deaths of

critics: Anna

Politkovskaya, Alexander Litvinenko, among others.”

http://www.rp.pl/artykul/2,484507.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8612843.stm

President Mr Lech Kaczynski had been elected

as a president in 2005, defeating Donald Tusk (now a
prime minister).
(

). That time also

his brother Jaroslaw Kaczynski had won parliamentary
voting and formed a new government. According to
United States Congress Research Centre analytic, Mr
Carl Ek the presidency and prime minister's
post are held by Lech and Jaroslaw Kaczynski, identical
twin brothers who have increasingly consolidated their
power. Their government's nationalist policies have
caused controversy domestically, in both the political and
economic arenas, and in foreign relations as well.
Relations with some neighbouring states and the

European Union have been strained at times, but ties with
the United States have not undergone significant change.
Some observers believe that a recent dispute within the
coalition may spark early elections.

This was a time of warming in Polish-America

relations. However also the time of great dissatisfaction
of Russian authorities and Col. Putin. The reason was
simple - natural Russian aversion to United States, based
especially on the Cold War experiences, when Col. Putin
had been working in KGB. The dissatisfaction however
comes also from 800 years of history of Russian
aspiration to concerning Poland and Central Europe.

According to Mr Gene Poteat:

The crash of the plane wiped out the cream of the top
officials who were behind the push to expose the secret
police files of past and current collaborators of both the
Polish and Soviet/Russian secret police. With these
people now dead, there is no political top cover
in

Poland

to continue this effort. This is exactly what

wanted. Prime Minister

Tusk

is a weak and

manipulability guy who hated the late Polish president.
The Russians now have their creature to work in place,
with no opposition from a strong anti-communist
president.
Policy-wise, the Russians saw our decision to grovel
before them (the “reset,” the giving up of ballistic missile
defense after we promised the Czechs and

, our

acquiescence to their activities in Georgia and

Ukraine

our begging for their non-help on Iran, et. al.) as a green

light to do what they did with the plane crash. They
concluded we would say nothing — and we did not.
And what, if anything, can America do? Nothing. Our
plate is full with wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, a vast
ecological disaster unfolding in the Gulf, North Korea
starting the next war between the Koreas, and at home,
unrest over the illegal invasion of America by Latinos
hiding under the misapplied term of “immigrant,” a
failing economy, and other political tsunamis. Besides,
strategic utility isn’t reserved only for Turks. Aren’t the
Russians helping in America’s war on terrorism? That
means American outrage and concerns over the Polish
“accident” will have to be as hollow and toothless
as

’s “investigations” to solve the crash mystery.

The

, however, see this as Yalta II, i.e., another sell-

out by the U.S.

Poland

is seething over this; the Obamisti

may think this will fade away, but the

and the rest

of Central Europe know better. For them this is a
monumental betrayal.
Life — as is history — is unfair. The

http://rt.com/Interview/2008-10-
07/Interview_with_Sergey_Karaganov.html

are in the

same spot as the Armenians, the Somalis, the Tutsi, the
American Indians, the Incas, the Eskimos and others.
Crucial alliances trump acknowledgement of prior bad
acts. I ignore your genocides, you ignore mine. The
guilty get a free pass. Or, in the argot of modern TV
sitcoms: Nobody Talks, Everybody Walks. And then
there is the old KGB saying, “It is no accident, comrade!
There were so several people, could be called “enemies”
by Russia or Mr Tusk.

  According to Prof. Peter Cheremushkin, Moscow State
University, an expert in Polish-Russian relations
research, relations between modern Poland and Russia
suffer from constant difficulties.
(http://file.wikileaks.org/file/crs/RS22509.txt)

During last several years, thick dividing line is

visible between two independent Polish foreign relation
politics. First, of the Prime Minister, Mr Tusk, pro-
Russian and second of the President Mr Lech Kaczynski
anty-Russian.

There were some people, could be called

“enemies” by Russia or Mr Tusk.

Eventual motives analyses.

Person
(function)

For Donald Tusk

For Moscow

Lech Kaczynski

(president, law
professor)

-Political opponent
-Re-election
candidacy
-Independent
foreign politics
-Knowledge about
contents of secret
annex to a report
describing Polish
military
intelligence
liquidation and
establishing new
secret service.
Former (WSI) was
establishing banks,

-Opponent in
international
politics
-Supporting
independence of
Ukraine
-Surviving
independence of
Georgia
-Supporting
Latvia in
conflict with
Russia
-Criticizing Col.
Putin
-Planes of

political parties,
sponsoring mafia
and terrorists,
trading arms,
killing people. It is
possible, that the
annex blamed Mr
Tusk or member of
his party.
-After death
replaced by former
WSI supervisor (as
deputy defense
minister) count
Bronislaw
“Bronek”
Komorowski.

building
pipeline steer
clear of Russia
to Europe.
-Projects of
shale gas in
Poland and $
milliards tolls of
Gazprom.
-Requesting of
Russian files
concerning
Katyn Massacre
disclosing.

Slawomir
Skrzypek

(Head of
central bank,
economist)

-Independent from
the prime minister
Tusk (but also the
president) financial
politics.
-Prohibiting of
transferring his
bank’s profits to
central budget.
-Reluctance to
Euro money
(follower of British
monetary
arrangements)

-Opponent of
the Gazprom’s
dept remitting
by Polish
government.
-Replaced by
leftist and pro-
Russian
economist Mr
Marek Belka

Franciszek

-Agreed to

-Planes of

liquidation of
WSI secret
service co-
operating with
Russian GRU.

Andrzej Blasik

-Nominated by Mr
Lech Kaczynski
-Nearly to be
dismissed by Mr
Klich, MD minister
of defense, but
according to
Gazeta Wyborcza
“protected” by
Kaczynski
-After died staff
com-out in PAF

-Graduated
studies in US,
replaced by the
man, who
graduated
studies in Soviet
Union

Andrzej
Karweta

(admiral of
fleet)

-Nominated by Mr
Lech Kaczynski

-Graduated

Royal College of
Defense Studies

in London,
-NATO
commander and
expert
(submarine
fighting and
mine clearance
aspects)
- Replaced by
the man who
inter alia studied
in Soviet Union

Tadeusz Buk

-High stage of

-NATO expert

(general, land
forces
commander)

independence

and commander
of International
division in Iraq,
deputy
commander of
NATO
consolidated
forces training
centre, deputy
commander of

Combined
Security
Transition
Command

–

Afghanistan
CSTC-A

Mr Wladyslaw
Stasiak (head of
presidential
office)

-The most trusted
officer of Mr
Kaczynski

On the 26

March
organized anty-
Gazprom
seminar among
experts.

According to Dr. Witold Waszczykowski,

former deputy head of National Security Bureau, former
deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Poland and
ambassador of Poland in Teheran, Iran, there is a policy
of European expansion of Russia that Mr Kaczynski was
an opponent.

As stated by Mr Waszczykowski, Mr Sergei

Karaganov, head of Council of Foreign Politics
appointed to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the

Kremlin is promoting the idea of creating an union
between Russia and Europe.

According to him – Waszczykowski relates – it is the
only way for surviving of the Western Civilisation. This
demands to establish the “united forces of power”. The
OSCE (Organization of Security and Co-Operation in
Europe) is now holding the negotiation concerning this
matter on the isle of Corfu. President Medvedev and
minister Lavrov are the authors of this project.

http://www.radiomaryja.pl/artykuly.php?id=1073
42

On the 20

of August 2010 Mr Dmitry

Medvedev, President of Russian Federation stated, that
Russia reserved the key role in the region of Caucasus It
had signed an agreement with Armenian Republic for
prolongation the stay of Russian armed forces’ base in
this country (in Gyumri) up to 2044 year.

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/61780

Next agreement is to be signing with

Azerbaijan. Russia will sell them two complexes of S-
300 Favourite high-speed surface to air missiles. The S-
300 are already spaced in Abkhazia and South Osetia.
Russian Black Sea Navy at the Crimea, Ukraine,
quartered in Sevastopol and Novoryisk seaports will stay
to 2042.

http://www.ewi.info/sevastopol-europes-date-
history

Up to the 10

of April 2010 Mr Lech Kaczynski was the

only one, who crossed Russian path and opposed Russian
plans to realise the idea formulated by Mr Karaganov.
Mr Kaczynski had united the East and Middle Europe to
be independent from Russia.

http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/content/2010/0
4/12/11839.shtml

Now Russian road to divide Europe on two is again
opened. The history repeats itself.

Information process and investigation analyzes

2.1

Credibility of the investigation

In the international aviation experience, there were

thousands of catastrophes and air disasters. Only three
ultimate intercessions had been noticed – an error of
flyer, machine systems malfunction or a criminal act. No
catastrophe cased by pressure on pilots had been
noticed.

Nevertheless, leading Polish media seek only to

convince to public opinion a version assuming a pilot’s
error forced by Polish president Mr Lech Kaczynski,
who had to force landing in heavy fog. Any official or
credible evidence has not confirmed this version. It also
stands in complete contradiction with the Cockpit Voice
Recorder transcripts.

This version is very convenient both for the

government of Mr Donald Tusk

, in political opposition

to Mr Lech Kaczynski

, and for Russian Interstate

Aviation Committee (MAK) of Moscow, which
certified:



The aircraft’s designer



The aircraft

 Its renovation in Samara (2009)



A facility were it was made



both facilities were it was renovated



a facility which overhauled the aircraft’s engines



a facility which overhauled the aircraft’s
hydraulics and Auxiliary Power Units



probably also an airfield

The average price of the MAK’s certificate rises about

$3.000.000

. For example by Joint Stock Company

“Aviacor” Samara Aircraft Plant three another
certificates are held. This corporation carried out the
aircraft’s overhaul in December 2009, which entailed
series of serious defects (including “steerage block”
failure in January 2010 during a rescue operation on
Haiti, after tragic earthquake. The aircraft carried Polish
rescuers with rescue dogs and search equipment had a
defect during the mission at a stop in Puerto-Rico

This all brings MAK’s credibility to zero, because it is

responsible for the quality of the aircraft (facilities,
aerodromes, devices), that are certificated by MAK, but
moreover MAK certificates are so expensive, as can be
considered as a form of corruption.

Polish mainstream media not only force-out MAK’s

version, but also extend it by Mr Kaczynski’s pressure to
the pilots hypothesis. The actions of the media are likely
to be correlated with the activities of MAK (in particular,
with the sequence of next MAK’s reports)

. The

activities of newspapers, online portals, radio and
television is carried at the two stages:

1. Disinformation

. Transmission to the public

opinion many, each other conflicting
informations. Overwhelming public opinion

thousands of pieces of information. Removing
the ability to understand events, and distractions
by different kind of hypotheses concerning rather
scenario, then causes of the air disaster.

2. Indoctrination of the pilot’s error version and

president’s Mr Lech Kaczynski (and Air Force
Commander-in-Chief Gen. Andrzej Blasik) role
in pressuring on the pilots to land in heavy fog.
Opinions and statements of experts are mainly
used to convince confused viewers much
differing from factual version of events.

These two items are nothing more than two stages of

brainwashing

, propaganda base. Not least, they are not

so separated from each other, as in the purely totalitarian
propaganda, because from the first minutes after the time
of accident, in public opinion, faith in assassination could
be noticed. Of course, to this day we do not know if it
was an attack or (failure is equally possible)

, but to

reduce public the tendencies to conspiracy theories

inculcation faze also has been introduced. Other words
beside disinformation, an official version, currently well
exhibited by Polish mainstream media had been
inculcated since the first minutes.

How to mistake the truth – brief instruction by Josef

Stalin

The disinformation is the best indication if in an affair

Russian intelligence had been taking part. The
disinformation was one of the biggest Russian weapons,
which make them able to easy defeat Germany in Europe
and Japan in Central Asia. Disinformation was the base

of the propaganda, the only factor of interior, foreign,
social and ideological policy of Soviet Union. The
disinformation was also clearly visible during Russo-
Georgian war, conflict in Chechnya, several hundred
accidents in Russia, including terrorist attack in Moscow
underground, Nevsky Express attack, Bieslan school
assault, Dobrovka theatre special action, Kursk sinking,
but also foreign affairs – for example Mr Alexander
Litvinenko killed by Russian intelligence, because the
Polonium killed him travelled London from Moscow.

According to Mr James H. Fetzer, American professor

and conspiracy theories specialist, disinformation was an
inherent part of Mr John Fitzgerald Kennedy
assassination.

The subject of disinformation appears to be far more
deserving of study by members of the assassination
research community than it seems to have had in the
past. Disinformation involves the dissemination of
incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise misleading
information with the objective, goal, or aim of deceiving
others about the truth. Sometimes the source is
accurately acknowledged (this might be called "overt"
disinformation), but sometimes it is concealed by
providing no identification or by providing misleading
identification (call this "covert"). The quantity and
quality of disinformation may be difficult to judge, but it
should be viewed more or less on a par with acts of lying,
but where the motives that usually bring about lying (to
preserve a relationship, to conceal an affair, to secure a
loan, and such) are displaced by other, often political,
motives, aims, or goals. Because this subject has received

so little attention, my purpose here in raising the issue is
to create
the opportunity for further discussion by advancing MY
OPINIONS in the hope of encouraging others to offer
their own views in order to promote theorizing about
disinformation.
Therefore cases of nearly all Soviet Union secret actions
indicate clearly that if it is not possible to cover an action
it should be prolonged by a disinformation process.
Another kind disinformation was a part of Kennedy
assassination. Consequentially analysing disinformation
after Kaczynski’s death it is possible to detect
assassination or Russian intelligence traces. However
please notice that both the traces are clearly visible on
common sense…

2.2

Just after the catastrophe

As far beck as the 10

of April (!) two-piece of such

information had been noticed:

1. Russian Member of Parliament (Duma) Mr

Vladimir Jirinovskiy: “A kind of role in the
catastrophe could play a stubbornness of
President of Republic of Poland”.

Mr Waclaw Radziwinowicz, journalist of Polish

daily “Gazeta Wyborcza” (the biggest and the
most popular newspaper of Poland): „When the
Polish pilot refused landing in airport of Tibilisi,
referring to the extremely difficult conditions
Kaczynski shouted at him and threatened, and

then was a big scandal that the pilot did not
comply with an order of the president. The pilot
was discarded from service and did not return
until the time of Prime Minister Tusk. Above
Smolensk could happened something like this!”

The sentence of Mr Waclaw Radziwinowicz (number 2)
is completely incompatible with the reality

 “Polish pilot refused landing at airport

in Tibilisi” – it is not truth. The situation
happened on the 12

of August 2008,

when Polish Air Force HQ and 36

Special Air Transport Regiment
Commander Col. Tomasz Pietrzak did
not permitted Pilot-In-Command of
presidential aircraft, Capt. Grzegorz
Pietruczuk to change flight destination
from Ganja, Azerbaijan, on Tibilisi,
Georgia as ordered Mr Kaczynski. Gen.
Krzysztof Załęski, PAF chef of staff
decided to permit only on flight to Ganja,
and then from Ganja to Tibilisi. President
Mr Lech Kaczynski finally decided to
travel from Ganja by car. During the visit
in Georgia unsuccessful attempt on the
Mr Kaczynski was noticed – his car was
probably shoted by a sniper

, near front

line (Chingvali, Georgia). At least two
shots were performed.

 “Referring to the extremely difficult

conditions” – that is also not truth.
Weather conditions over Tibilisi on the

of August 2008 were very good. The

reasons of not making a flight directly to
Tibilisi were three: lack of diplomatic
permission from Georgia, lack of data
about the airport status after Russian
bombing and presence of Russian
fighters in the Georgian air space,
without friend-foe identification
receivers comparable with receivers
mounted on the board of presidential
aircraft.

 “Kaczynski shouted at him and

threatened” – that is also not truth. As it
was confirmed – Mr Kaczynski asked
the pilot “who is [constitutional] chef of
the armed forces?”. Pilot-In-Command
replied: “You, Mr President”. “So please
do my request and fly to Tibilisi” –
Kaczynski ordered. Despite this the
flight directly to Tibilisi was not madden
due to procedures and flight regulations
that PIC had to comply.

 “The pilot was discarded from service” –

that is not truth. Capt. Grzegorz
Pietruczuk was never discarded from
service. After the time of incident before
a flight to Georgia, he was immediately
medalled by Minister of National
Defense in Donald Tusk’s government
Bogdan Klich, MD. Capt. Grzegorz
Pietruczuk is 36

Special Air Transport

Regiment pilot even now. Please also

notice that in Republic of Poland
President is not able to throw a pilot
away from work.

 “didn’t return until the time of Prime

Minister Tusk” – this sentence seems to
be fully aware of the lie. Mr Donald
Tusk has been a Prime Minister of
Republic of Poland since the 16

November 2007, so he was already PM
at the time of incident (12

of August

2008).

However, in the background, disinformation processes
were also clearly visible. As a piece of evidence must be
treated official, information noticed also on the 10

April 2010.

On the 11

of April, “Gazeta Wyborcza” quoted Mr

Aleksandr Bastykin, Deputy Attorney General of
Russian Federation, who standing alongside of Prime
Minister Vladimir Putin stated that: “Recording of the
conversations of pilots of Tu-154 which crashed near
Smolensk indicates, that after ignoring Russian
recommendations, the Polish crew decided to land”.

This sentence can be treated only as official, because of
the rank of the man who firmed it. It was not only
presented and quoted by Polish “Gazeta Wyborcza”, but
also by Russian media, especially by newsru.com. Now
we know that “reading” of Cockpit Voice Recorder took
MAK

weeks

and Mr Bastykin could not know it on

the 10

of April when he should tell it.

The article (“Pilots landed contrary to

recommendations. It is confirmed by conversations

recordings”)

, in which Mr Bastykin’s sentences are

quoted, had been published on the 12

of April (Monday)

on the front page of “Gazeta Wyborcza”. On the
website of this Polish daily, gazeta.pl, the time of the last
actualization concerning this article is specified very
precisely: 01:03AM, 11.04.2010 (Sunday). It means that
it is concerning only the information from the day of
catastrophe, when:

1. The Russians had known causes of catastrophe

before commission started first investigation
works.

2. The Russians had known contents of CVR

recordings before their opening, examination and
reading works had been even started.

3. The official version, which is currently presented

by MAK was already created (at the day of
catastrophe!).

In the same article, other disinformation relations can

be noticed. “Gazeta Wyborcza” wrote as following:

 “Due to bad weather conditions: fog and

terrible visibility, the Russians recommended
landing at the airport in Minsk – informed the
Prime Minister President’s representative
Georgiy Poltavchenko, who was waiting at the
airfield on the Polish delegation and was a
witness of the catastrophe. He told – as
reported newsru.com, - that during the landing
of the aircraft, engines’ noise could not be
heart, but only few strange beats. ‘Where you
first at the place of event?’ – asked Putin,
‘within three minutes’ – Poltavchenko

answered.” - we can only ask how did he
know (as a “witness”) what had Air Traffic
Control recommended Polish Air Force
aircraft? It is not possible for him to hear radio
conversations, while he was standing on the
airfield, waiting for Polish delegation to
welcome them as a representative delegated by
President Dimitriy Miedviediev.



“According to the Russian Transport Minister
Igor Levtin, pilot of Polish airplane decided to
land on his own, although the visibility was
only 400 meters, despite it is necessary 1000
meters - informs Interfax news agency”

Nevertheless, the most clearly disinformed gen.
Aleksandr Aloshyn, Deputy Chef of Staff of Russian
Air Force (VVS). He spoke probably falsely

, that crew

of the presidential aircraft repeatedly failed to comply the
flight controller’s commands. Now, after CVR transcripts
are published, we know that only one command was not
executed – “go around”, which had been only one time,
when the aircraft was flaying below the glideslope for a
long time

, moreover after hitting trees on the terrain

General Aloshyn told as fallows (10.04.2010)

 “the crew of the aircraft with the Polish president

did not respond to the warnings, what
unfortunately led to a tragedy.” – CVR was not
opened yet. That is why he could not know about
the systems warning. The same applies to ATC
warnings.

 “When the crew had not accomplish flight control

chef commands, he several times commanded to

direct the aircraft to alternative airport” – that is
not truth. ATC chef at Smolensk-North
aerodrome, Lt.-Col. Pavel Plusnin had not
directed aircraft to alternative airport, did not
recommended to fly to alternative airport

and

did not close the aerodrome for landing and take-
off operations although he was obligated to do it
by aviation rules.



“Aircraft Tu-154M with Polish president Lech
Kaczynski on the distance of 50km entered the
zone and by the chef of flights

had been

informed about poor weather conditions in the
region

of planned landing.

It was

recommended for him to fly to the alternative
aerodrome. (…) The crew – unlikely did not
cease descending and everything ended
tragedious.”

All sentences quoted above, are a kind of focus, a

direction of the whole disinformation process, that have
been started on the next day – on the 11

of April 2010.

Please notice, that Russians clearly identified a cause of
the air disaster several hours after it had happened, at the
time when body of Polish President Mr Kaczynski still
was laying profaned in the mud.

In Russia, there is a tendency of blame on the dead,

after each air disaster. This tendency is the most
comfortable as a background of the investigation and
political processes around it - both for Russians as for the
Polish government of Mr Donald Tusk, and a new
president from the Tusk’s formation PO (Civic Platform)
count Bronislaw Komorowski.

We do not exactly

know if anybody is guilty, but it is clearly evidenced, that
a target of the investigation is to cover the truth.

2.3

Next days

(Up to 72 hours after the catastrophe)

On the 11

of April 2010 at 14:45, “Gazeta

Wyborcza” published again disinformation article, titled:
“Investigative findings: catastrophe couldn’t be caused
by technical problems”. This publication demonstrates
conclusively that:

 Supported by MAK even now hypothesis,

that there were no failures concerning the
aircraft, appeared a day after catastrophe,
before the time of opening Flight Data
Recorder, and before Russian technical
commission of MAK has started
investigational works.

As (dis)informs “Gazeta Wyborcza”: “Russian
investigators working at the prosecutor’s office initially
ruled out, that presidential aircraft catastrophe in
Smolensk could be cased by technical problems”.

This

information is double sourced, because the same
communicate had been published by Polish second-
largest press agency IAR, public institution. Quoted by
IAR and “Gazeta Wyborcza” Mr Aleksandr Bastrykin,
“Head of Investigation Committee of Russian Attorney
Office” declared as follows: “The Tupolev, on the board
of which to Katyn

on the anniversary celebrations

president was flaying, was in excellent condition”

That is not a place for polemics, but please notice that

not every 20-years old Soviet aircraft, enjoys excellent
condition, especially according to very large repair card
index of Polish Air Force 101.

In the technical part of the book all Flights Registers’

history, and known data will be described. In this section
disinformation, evidence should be however shown. By
the biggest and the most popular Polish daily “Gazeta
Wyborcza” as follows had been written

on the 11

April, when no flight recorders had been opened yet:

“Russian investigators and Polish experts begun
examination of the “black boxes” of the presidential
airplane, which crashed on Saturday morning at
Smolensk - announced on Sunday Russian prosecutor’s
office. Experts agreed that the tape recording flight
parameters has moved inside the “black box”. As
reported by PAP

, also evidence at Okecie

had been

secured.” - A kind of inaccuracy is clearly shown after
reading official communicates, which had been published
time after the one quoted above.

Moreover, a scale of disinformation in mainstream

media of Poland was much larger. For example focused
on intellectualists and regarded as greatest and most
opinion forming in Poland daily “Rzeczpospolita” (Eng.
“The Republic”) published on Monday, 12

of April

2010, 48 hours from the time of air disaster quoted Polish
prosecutors Mr Andrzej Seremet, Attorney General of
Republic of Poland, and Col. Krzysztof Parulski, Head
of Supreme Military Prosecution. Probably as a subtle
element of polemics with competitive “Gazeta
Wyborcza” article had been titled: ”There is no

information that has been a pressure on pilots”. Polish
prosecutors, according to “Rzeczpospolita” told on a
press briefing as following

 Mr Andrzej Seremet:

“experts will try to ‘pick up’
background of conversations from
cockpit, to confirmed if there have
been any suggestions for pilots”

“On this stage of investigation there
are no data from which it would
appear, that the pressure on the pilots
to landed in spite of difficult
conditions was exerted”

 Col. Krzysztof Parulski:

“The third ‘black box’ is found.”

“We forwarded it to Moscow, to the
same Polish-Russian team, that is
analyzing previous two recorders”

“A preliminary examination indicated
that it was not damaged, but
everything will turn out after it will be
opened”

“The box records co-called increased
flight parameters, and from the
content of its recordings also
appropriate conclusions will be
reached” .

“There are no obstacles that in some
fundamental manner would impede
reading of information.”

“Confirmed in contents of black
boxes’ recording is version most

probable – concerning landing in
difficult weather conditions”.

Article described above reports also that Col. Parulski
“assessed cooperation with Russian services as
exemplary”.

Therefore, we can draw the following conclusions:

1. Polish Investigators (although they were

glorifying cooperation with the Russians) stayed
in conflict with Russian communicates.

2. On 48 hours from the time of catastrophe so-

called “forced landing” version, currently most
likely in Polish mainstream media was
preliminary excluded.

3. The investigators were working rather to find any

evidence of pressure on the pilots, than cause of
the air disaster.

4. Informations from quoted in this section articles

of “Gazeta Wyborcza” have been demented
officially a day after.

Black boxes: Mars-BM Flight Data Recorder and

ATM Quick Access Receiver have been found
10-11

of April, and Flight Data Recorder on 12

of April 2010.

6. Quotes of Polish prosecutors show that they two

days after catastrophe tried to indicate as a cause
of catastrophe pilot’s error, completely like
MAK. They became participants in
disinformation.

2.4

Mourning time

(12

-16

of April 2010)

Disinformation reached it’s apogee in the first week

after the air disaster. Lots of staying in conflict with each
other pieces of news had been published by media and
press agencies all over the world.

At this time, Poland was in mourning. State flags were

lowered to half a mast. Millions of people put flowers
and candles on the pedestrian crossing in front of the
Presidential Palace in Warsaw. Under these conditions,
more and more speculations about the causes of
catastrophe were presented by media but also statistical
citizens. All of the versions (from pilots’ error up to
assassination or terrorist attack) were confirmed by many
different pieces of information, from many different
sources, both official and unofficial. At the same time,
many another, different pieces of information negated
them.

Due to the disinformation, (misinformation) public

opinion was very confused. On the 12

of April 2010 at

11:38 on Polish portal niezalezna.pl, (“independent”
short information was published, concerning an article
from weekly “Wprost” (“directly”)

. According to the

portal and “Wprost” 48 hours after the time of disaster:

1.  Two flight recorders had been examined.
2.  Experts had been matching voices to people.
3.  Russians had not opened flight recorders to the

time of Polish expert’s arrival.

Discussion about this article, in the comments on the

page of niezalezna.pl portal is direct evidence of scale
and efficiency of disinformation on 12

and 13

of April.

(It was Monday and Tuesday, aircraft crashed on
Sunday). As linked in footnotes, people were reflecting:

1. Why Russians provide ambiguous informations

about the number of approaches? (user Zorro).

What about the tower, which aircraft hit into?

(user Rut)

3. In what language did Air Traffic Controllers

speak? (user A)

4. Immediately after the disaster, the FSB arrested a

flight controller. There are photos of the start of
Tu-154 from Warsaw, on which something
strange is going on with its engine (user Jacek)

Such comments could not be only noted at every Polish

online forum those days, but also in mainstream media
and on the streets. Grief was mixed with disinformation,
and pain with a doubt.

Confusion of millions

of people, who were

wondering about in front of Presidential Palace, crying,
praying, putting flowers, as well as millions of people
who stayed at home this weekend was an ideal basic for
misinformation.

On the 13

of April Gen. Tatiana Anodina, Head of

Interstate Aviation Committee (as announced wp.pl
Polish web portal) and col. Krzysztof Parulski, stated
that “the third black box” would be traced in Poland
because it is “Polish patent (…) and it only can be
responded in Poland”, as Col. Parulski described it. As
it is known now, it was not truth, according to “Gazeta
Polska”, because the same model of Quick Access
Recorder of “ATM Awionika” company, Poland, had
also a Tupolev-154M of China Northwestern Airlines on

its board. The aircraft (flight 2303) crashed in an air
disaster on the 6

of June 1994, shortly after take off

from Xian-Xianyang International Airport (ZLXY, XIY),
China. At that time, a Polish QAR recorder had been sent
to Interstate Aviation Committee MAK, Moscow,
Russia and without any problems, it was redden by MAK
in their laboratories. It had not been sent to Poland then

Mr Parulski stated also on the 13

of April as

following:

 „Works concerning the recorder will be

held with the participation of the representatives
of the Russian side”.



Reading of the black boxes will last at

least 2 weeks.

A specifying objective of the disinformation was

winning the election by ruling PO party candidate, count
Bronislaw Komorowski. Because Mr Jaroslaw
Kaczynski, ex-prime minister and brother of president
Mr Lech Kaczynski, who died in the air disaster, was an
opponent of Mr Komorowski, disinformation should last
nearly two month, until the election

. So long, without

unavailable in democratic system, it is not possible to
keep high disinformation efficiency. Please notice that
not every newspaper (but all mainstream) in Poland was
taking a part in disinformation, and it is not possible to
censure the Internet in democratic system.

That is why on the 14

of April substitution subjects

appeared for media. The reason was to distract public
attention from the cases of tragedy and conflicted each
other sentences of Polish and Russian prosecutors
(quoted above).

Because all over the world public opinion was truly

interested in knowing why so high-rank people was
flaying to Russia, a 2007 Polish feature-documentary
film “Katyn” of Mr Andrzej Wajda

(one of the best

Polish film directors, honoured by Oscar) was to be
projected by many TV stations and cinemas all over the
world

This news was a perfect substitution subject. One of

the basic human needs, a specially in a sadness is to be in
the centre of other’s attention. Even normally without
any sadness we need a closure of another people, we
need to have someone to talk with.

The same positive feeling is concerning international

attention. Please notice that this simple psychological
schema works in a mind of everybody. For example a
kind of proud appears, when Mr Barack Obama says, that
“the Great Britain is the main strategic partner of USA”.
We can do not like him, but it is ennobling.

Completely another situation is concerning a personal

disaster, for example a funeral of a family member. Of
course, every person feels bereavement completely
different then others, fully on his own, support of another
people in extremely important.

An information process that took place on the

Wednesday 14

of April 2010, 4 days after air disaster

mixed both situations described above.

PAP communicated as follows: “All the world

wants to see ‘Katyn’ of Wajda”.

This information penetrated all the news portals, TV

news, and front pages of newspapers. Radio stations and
TV experts commented only that.

The substitution subject perfectly introduced a process,

directly targeting the public opinion to an official
version.

On the 15

of April, very well frequented statement

was published. The statement was prepared probably
several days earlier. Russian daily “Kommersant”, of
course commonly quoted by all mainstream Polish media
released its columns for an anonymous Russian expert,
who had perfectly known all the details concerning the
catastrophe, as well as the details of an official version.
He stated as following

1. “A likelihood of catastrophe in such landing is

very high. A pilot of the presidential machine
knew about it very well. No less he made an
unreasonable from a standpoint of all flaying
manuals and common sense.” – as we know, it is
not truth, because landing in low visibility likely
of catastrophe is not high. Many times in poor
visibility emergency landing are performed all
over the world and usually are successful.

2. “During approach to Smolensk, the local

controllers informed the crew, that landing is
impossible and proposed a departure to the
alternative airport in Minsk or Moscow, but the
commander [PIC] urged for descending to a
decision point, which in case of Tu-154M is
100m over an airfield” – That also is not truth,
because Smolensk Air Traffic Controllers of

Russian Air Force, Mr Pavel Plusnin and Mr
Victor Ryjenkho did not propose PLF-101 to fly
to an alternative airport. Pilot-In-Command did
not urge, but only one time asked for a
descending permission. An alternative airfield
was not Moscow and Minsk, but Vitebsk and
Minsk.

This lying statement was probably a kind of test,

concerning a reaction of the public opinion on shock
information, because objected pilots a self-killing
proceeding. There was no reaction. It was a first success
of disinformation.

2.5

Volcanic Funeral?

(16

-18

of April 2010)

On the 16.04.2010 took place a significant situation.

An Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajökull had erupted

. A

volcanic dust cloud crossed the Europe at a cruise
altitude of passenger airplanes. Because the dust can
probably damage turbine engines, all around the Europe
flights had been stopped, airports closed and aircraft
grounded.

At this point, a kind of conclusion must appear. Air

disaster took place on the 10

of April, dust grounded all

European aviation only few days later. It also became a
pretext to do not come for the Mr Lech Kaczynski’s
funeral to Krakow. For example, Mr Barack Hussein
Obama did not come to Krakow, due to the dust he could
play golf and relax.

A week after a catastrophe was a time of national

mourning in Poland.

On the 11

of April, a body of Mr Kaczynski came

back to Poland on the board of military CASA C-295M
transport aircraft, escorted by two MiG-29A multirole
fighters of Polish Air Force. Mr Kaczynski was
unbelievable quickly identified.

After finding and coming back of a first lady, Mrs. Maria
Kaczynska’s body to Poland on the 13

of April both

coffins had been exposed to public view in the haul of
Presidential Palace, Warsaw

Due to millions of people wanted to honour it was

nearly impossible to get Presidential Palace for Polish
people that days

On the 18

of April, a public ecumenical devotion was

celebrated on the Pilsudski’s Square in Warsaw, Poland,
where present about 100.000 people

On the 19

of April took place a Funeral Ceremony in

Krakow, during which several thousands of people were
present, including 34 attending dignitaries of only 16
countries.

These were only representatives, who were present not

due to a kind of obligation, but due to an honour. Mr
Gordon Brown ex-Prime Minister did not come, along
with Mr Nicolas Sarkozy, President of France. President
of the United States Mr Barack Hussein Obama,
preferred to play golf

, although Mr Mekheil

Saakashvili, President of Georgia managed to came to
from USA to Krakow by plane.

Also a representative of Pope, His Holiness Benedict

XVI, cardinal Angelo Sodano did not come from Italy,
although via Italy came Mr Mekheil Saakashvili,
President of Georgia. Italian prime minister Mr Silvio
Berlusconi also did not manage to come.

Please notice that a Georgian first lady, Mrs. Sandra

Roelofs, friend of Mrs. Maria Kaczynska came from
Brussels by car. To get on time she was driving without
stop for 13 hours

Mrs. Angela Merkel did her best to came, but it was

impossible for her to get on time, because she was in a
travel.

Not only friends, but also international politics

opponents of Mr Lech Kaczynski came for his funeral.
For example Mr Victor Yanukovych, president of
Ukraine, had no problem with flaying throw the dust on
the board of 30 years old Tupolev-134A. In addition, Mr
Dmitry Medvedev, President of Russian Federation
came.

Mr Abbas El Fassi, Prime Minister of Moroccan

Kingdom flew to Poland without earlier confirmation and
with no flight permission. For him there was also no
problem with volcano ash cloud, he shown to the world
not lies, which usually are characterizing politics but an
honour – his own and his state, which he is representing.

The best relative from the funeral is an article from
“the Sunday Times” (The Times):

“Polish President’s funeral is local affair as volcanic
ash grounds world leaders

Roger Boyes in Krakow

World leaders, kings and princes cancelled their trips to
pay tribute to the late President Lech Kaczynski at a
grand state funeral in Krakow, blaming the cloud of
volcanic ash hovering over Europe.

As a result, the Polish head of state was seen off by two
dozen Central and East European leaders — who had
made their way to Poland by car and by train — as well
as by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and hundreds
of thousands of Poles who had been travelling across the
country to Krakow for the past 36 hours.

“It is perhaps better this way,” said Kamil Podgowinski,
a boy scout who had spent the night waiting for an open-
air Mass in Krakow’s Market Square. “We are together
among ourselves. It has become a Polish event again.”
Despite the closure of Polish air space, the coffins of the
President and his wife, Maria, were flown by a turbo-
prop aircraft to Krakow early today and were due to be
laid to rest in the crypt of Wawel Cathedral, alongside
Polish kings, poets and national heroes.

President Barack Obama topped a long list of statesmen
and women who decided that attending the funeral would
be too risky. Although it would be feasible to fly in a
small plane — a delegation from Morocco flying in a
small Cessna touched down in Krakow without problems

on Saturday night — many politicians are worried about
a fresh ash cluster stranding them in Poland.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, on her way back
from the US last week, found herself re-routed to Lisbon.
She managed to fly to Rome before taking a convoy of
cars to Germany via South Tyrol. Back in Berlin, she
cancelled the trip to Krakow but Germany will be
represented by President Horst Koehler.

President Sarkozy of France, Spanish premier José Luis
Zapatero, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the
Nato Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the
president of the European Council Herman van Rompuy,
the Prince of Wales and the crowned heads of Norway,
Denmark, Spain and Sweden are all staying at home.

Some refused to be deterred. Jerzy Buzek, the President
of the European Parliament drove across Europe, while
many European deputies crowded into trains.

However, the character of the funeral was unmistakably
changed. “It was supposed to have been a geopolitical
occasion,” Maciej Wierzynski, a veteran Polish
commentator, said. “You could tell that by the fact that
President Obama agreed originally to come as soon as
Russian President Medvedev said he would be there.”
The subtext of the funeral is that the air crash that killed
the President and 95 others, including many senior
officials, has brought Poles and Russians emotionally
closer. The delegation had been flying into the fog-bound

city of Smolensk, in western Russia, to commemorate the
thousands of Poles murdered by Soviet hitmen in 1940.

The crime, denied or barely acknowledged by Russia for
decades, has suddenly become part of the country’s
national discourse.

But if Poles and Russians draw closer there is a knock-on
effect and US policy towards Eastern Europe has to be
redrafted. The funeral was to be an opportunity to make
a first assessment of the changing political landscape.

Instead, it has become an opportunity for Eastern
European leaders to say farewell to a hard-headed
politician — and for Poles to shed the last of their public
tears.”

2.6

Between the funeral and the national holiday.

A funeral of Mr Lech Kaczynski and Mrs. Maria

Kaczynska did not stop the disinformation campaign. It
was only a kind of gap, which allowed disinformation
authors to regroup forces and attack harder.
Disinformation flared up anew.

A typical example of propaganda is an interview

Gen. Gromoslaw Czempinski, former chef of Polish
Office of State Protection (UOP), agency based on
communistic special services of Ministry of Interior (SB
–eng.: The Security Service). Managed by Czempinski
agency was only a copy and powers extension of
communistic archetype. However, commander of UOP
was many times accused of being a Russian intelligence

– so called - agent of influence

, until 1996, when UOP

had been finally abolished

An evidence of the influence of communistic secret

services in Poland is the fact, that in contrast to the
Germany where The Federal Commissioner for the Stasi
Archives

had been established – in Poland to this day

archives of SB are nearly completely secret and
unavailable for normal people.

However, on the 20

of April Gen. Czempinski, like at

the time of his already forgotten prosperity, again fleshed
in the media. His radio interview was commonly quoted
in newspapers, TV, web portals

Mrs. Monika Olejnik: And a guest of Radio ZET is

general Gromoslaw Czempinski, former chef of UOP, a
pilot.

Gen. Gromoslaw Czempinski: Good morning.

MO: General Gromoslaw Czempinski is a guest of

Radio ZET, we are all the time reflecting what could be a
reason of catastrophe of Tu-154, in which 96 people are
killed. There are informations that a pilot could mistake
a gorge, but this pilot had been flaying to Smolensk
before.

GC: Maybe let’s say from the beginning. It seems that

a reason of the catastrophe was pilot’s error. On this
pilot’s error imposed – we can say – a second factor
weather, a weather conditions, which cased, that
approaching to landing he takes excessive risk, as to how
far I can descend above the ground, to take a decision
will I land or won’t land. In conditions of this airport, so
an airport unequipped with ILS, many airports are still

without ILS equipment, such decision should be taken
maximal, lowest, so to say, at some 80 meters, normally
it is 100 meters.

Today we can only reflect, I think, that common

commissions, which are working, air investigation
commissions will explain it, how it happened, that pilot
occurred so low, so far from the airport and let’s
remember that noticing of for example, a difference of
levels of 60 meters, how they say, that it could be in
Smolensk is extremely difficult.

(…)

Using this words general Czempinski confirmed a

medial news from several days before, that a pilot did not
know about a kind of gorge or a ravine situated on the
approach course in Smolensk. PIC major Arkadiusz
Protasiuk had landed at Smolensk many times
previously

, but it probably does not matter for gen.

Czempinski or he does not know about it. He is also
hardly evidencing alleged pilot’s error.

We cannot say that the funeral of Mr Kaczynski and

his wife was a substation subject – of course not.
Nevertheless, analyzing information of subsections
above, we can notice, that Polish and Russian
prosecution was not interested in quickly disclosing of
the “black box” recordings. Now, on the August 2010,
only a CVR transcripts is let on, FDR and QAR
recordings are still secret, although possessed by Poland
for weeks.

Although “Polish prosecutors” allegedly were present

during CVR and FDR examination, Russia for a long
time had not replied for Polish requests concerning the

“black boxes”. To this day, they are in MAK, Moscow
and nobody noticed that they are a property of Poland.

On the 20

of April Mr Andrzej Seremet, Attorney

General of Republic of Poland of his press briefing stated
as following:

1. Already today, we will refer to the Russian side

for an access to a preliminary analysis of
conversations recorded by the flight recorder.

2. The investigation may take up even more than a

year.

3. I had in mind transcripts as preliminary analyses.

Clearly visible has become a trend of presenting of the

“black boxes” as the key evidence in the investigation.
Because the Russian side described recordings as the
main evidence already on the day of the catastrophe
undisputable is compliance. As it is determined by
international regulations, there is not only voice-
recording “black box” on the board on an aircraft, but
also co-could “flight data recorder”. Greater weight as an
evidence has of course Flight Data Recorder FDR,
because it shows what is going on not with a crew, but
with an airplane. No less speeches of Polish and Russian
prosecutors show, that they put a greater emphasis not for
FDR, but for CVR “black box”. This trace can assume
that, both investigations - Polish and Russian - were
conducted to reach a result formed in advance. Both
investigations were also perfectly synchronized to prove
one cause – precession on the pilots, exerted by president
Mr Lech Kaczynski and commander of the Air Force
Gen. Andrzej Blasik. The main evidence appeared to be
“black boxes”. Such situation is as unbelievable, because

the aircraft was a 20-years old Tupolev, with regular
failures, renovated in Russia. It is commonly known that
exploitation of aircraft with similar or such
characteristics is quite dangerous. That is why uncritical
assumption of the pilot’s error is completely contrary to
prosecutors/investigators objectivity and independence
rules.

These theses are confirmed in the investigations

conduct analyses.

The political character of the Polish investigators’

works (including Mr Seremet and Col. Parulski) has been
fully shown on the 22

of April 2010, when an

announcement of two Polish ministers to Moscow
appeared. As radio RMF and PAP agency proclaimed:

“announced departure regarding Smolensk Air Disaster is
to strengthen a request of Prosecution, which requests
flight recorders and its recordings”.

Meanwhile a disinformation campaign turned in a high

gear. Superiority absolutely kept “Gazeta Wyborcza”

which nearly every day let front-page articles concerning
pilot’s errors in Smolensk. A middle column of this most
popular Polish daily was full of Russian experts’
opinions, also concerning pilots’ error. No evidence of
course – “Gazeta Wyborcza” was only quoted so called
“experts”. They had a right to do it, but objectivity had
been lost many days before.

No less “Gazeta Wyborcza” was only a part of great

medial machinery. With “Gazeta Wyborcza” completely
agreed nearly all Polish dailies concerning most popular
tabloid “Super Express” and the most opinion-forming

“Rzeczpospolita”. Every article from the newspapers was
very positively commented in weeklies for example
“Newsweek Polska”, and quoted in news of all Polish
information TV’s: national TVP INFO, using a satellite
and terrestrial transmitters, and also by TVN-24 and
POLSAT News – satellite channels. Any such
information was enclosed by an interview with so called
“expert”, especially Mr Tomasz Hypki, who every
information concerning a pilot’s error confirmed
certainly, although in the details they were all completely
conflicted each other.

TV press reviews were not exposing articles

concerning another versions – they nearly only quoted
pilot’s error opinions.

Every article concerning a pilot’s error was of course

also quoted by web portals, and local small broadcasting
institutions, as well as local newspapers and magazines,
through PAP news agency, which forwarded every article
concerning catastrophe, but by some miracle, only those
concerning pilot’s error appeared in local media.

Radio of a national “Polish Radio” managed full

objectivity. They maintained a balance between opinions
concerning all air disasters cases. However, commercial
stations are in Poland more popular than for years
founding in a faze of tissues withering “Polish Radio”.

National holiday and farther disinformation

1-3 of May are day of national holiday in Poland.

It have been carried out by disinformation coordinators to

perform processes targeted onto remaking mourning
atmosphere in the public opinion, to have time to
reorganize forces and an emotional background to use
manipulation in their disinformation strategy.

Commercials stations no objectivity preserved

and informed not only that, but also why it was a mistake
of pilots. In order to visualize a construction of main-
stream media transfer an article of leading “Gazeta
Wyborcza” from the 5

of May 2010, quoted by one of

the biggest Polish web portals Interia.pl (of course
through PAP agency, as described above) will be
summarized. A headline is clear: “Russian expert: it
was classical mistake of the pilot!”.

According to Interia.pl and PAP

1. “The Russian experts whom, ‘Gazeta Wyborcza”

was talking with, opine, that a case of
presidential aircraft’s catastrophe was a classical
pilot’s error, i.e. “collision with ground in
controlled flight”, known as ‘SFIT’”. – Of
course, this statement (traditionally) is not truth.
Even MAK announced, that “an aircraft crashed
during a try of going around” – so classifying the
catastrophe as a Controlled Flight Into Terrain is
rather controversial. In additional every pilot
knows, that a SFIT incident category does not
exist. SFIT can be only St. Francis Institute of
Technology, University of Mumbai part. They
could only have on their mind a CFIT accident, a
Controlled Flight Into Terrain.

2. ”As claims well-known Russian test pilot-

specialist, who reserved an anonymity, the Tu-

154 three times flew above an aerodrome in
Smolensk, drawing a rectangle, to measure out
ground-based beacons. It was to help pilot in
precise defining of landing direction. For there is
‘imprecision’ aircraft guidance system working
on the aerodrome, so a crew has to control their
flight level using on-board instruments” – As it is
not difficult to notice, it is also not truth. As
announced days after, and as CVR transcripts
evidences Tu-154 did not fly three times above
aerodrome. They made only a half off full round
and then started approach from east to south,
opposite to enroute flight direction. Therefore,
only one rule can be noticed - lies are different,
but only one target – a pilot’s error. As “Gazeta
Wyborcza” did not notice, they did not have to
define centreline by beacons, because it had been
automatically determined by on-board flight
managing systems, using gyroscopic inertial
systems, GPS and NDB directions. NDB had
been used specially as approach markers – inner
and outer. Approach including a sink rate moment
have been madden by the autopilot in all
channels, using FMS Universal Avionics UNS-
1D, to a time after the first obstacle impact.
Russian pilot quoted by “Gazeta Wyborcza” odds
with the truth also in the last sentence - as every
pilot knows you must all the time and every time
control your flight level, even in precise approach
– this is a basic rule.

3. “As evidenced by previous findings Tu-154

undergone with correct course over the first

beacon, but further due to unknown reasons
reduced the flight level.” – this statement is
completely tommyrot. Please notice that a
‘course’ does not relate to flight level, but to
direction. Approach path is related to flight level.
Moreover descending is ex-definicione reduction
of flight level.

4. Russian expert opines that reason of the error

could be the fact that an aircraft was flaying this
time over a deep gorge – one of the altimeters can
therefore read off distance of machine to soil and
confuse the pilot. – this is a classical statement
concerning the catastrophe - a background of
thousands of articles and reasoning of that days. It
is a quintessence of disinformation. As a time
after CVR transcripts evidenced, pilot and flight
level controlling autopilot were using barometric
altimeter during approach that is why any gorge
does not matter. It is impossible to set an
autopilot of Tu-154M (ABSU-154-II) to use radio
altimeter, because it is not compatible with. That
is why gorge cannot deviate a glide path during
approach. Please also notice that Pilot-In-
Command, major Arkadiusz Protasiuk had been
an airman for almost 21 years, including 13 years
of flaying experience on this exemplar of
Tupolev-154M. During this time major Protasiuk
many times had landed at Smolensk-North Air
Base, Russia (XUBS), last time three days before
the catastrophe, on the 7

of April 2010. That is

why he known airport’s topography perfectly and
could not be confused by radio altimeter.

5. At this moment, according to the expert crew

ceased to watch instruments and started to search
ground. – this also is not truth. As evidenced in
the CVR transcripts nobody was searching the
ground. Flight level was controlled every 10m
permanently, instruments were controlled to the
last moment.

As can be inferred from the already quoted articles

many conflicted each other allegation ware terminated to
convince, that pilot’s error cased the air disaster,
according to the rule “End justifies the means”. That is
why following hypotheses were published in the
mainstream media:

1. “Pilots did not speak Russian language” – not

truth, later demented

“Pilots made 4 approaches” – not truth, later
demented

3. “Pilots made 4 rounds over the airfield” –not

truth, later demented

4. “Pilots were searching the ground” – not truth,

completely conflicted with CVR transcripts

6. “It was landing forced by Kaczynski or Blasik” –

not truth, force aspect completely unconfirmed by
CVR transcripts, probably it was not a landing,
only missed going around after decision level
during approach. Landing faze had not been
started by the crew.

These are only examples of the theories that are

inculcated to public even now.

2.7

Before the Preliminary Report of MAK

– 19

of May 2010)

On the beginning of May 2010, Russians had to be

preferred to publish the preliminary report of the
investigations, because according to them, ICAO rules
impose sum first month of investigation.

At this time disinformation campaign next time was set

to full power. In Poland, many articles concerning pilot’s
error had been published by “Gazeta Wyborcza” and
“Rzeczpospolita” along with tabloids “Fakt” and “Super
Express”. TV campaign had been lead by TVN and
TVN-24. In addition, their web portals were used in the
campaign.

Nevertheless, this time not Polish media were going to

create a flashpoint in disinformation direction. A
breakthrough character had a statement of Mr Yuri
Chaikha, Attorney General of the Republic of Russia. He
stated on the 6

of May, that: “The Interstate Aviation

Committee [MAK] is preparing to transfer to the Polish
party, a materials from the work of Committee”.

In this materials – according to Mr Chaikha should be
included inter alia:

1. FDR recording copy
2. CVR recording copy (probably with pilots’

conversations transcripts)

http://www.tvp.info/informacje/swiat/polska-na-razie-
nie-dostanie-akt-sledztwa/1748920

The most probable reason of the statement were not the

legal issues, which usually determine activities of an
attorney or prosecutor, especially Attorney General,
because transferring of the evidence via Attorney office

is not an answer to the application for legal help,
requested by Polish Attorney General, Mr Andrzej
Seremet Office – one reason the evidence is not
administrated by Russian Attorney General Office, but
by international organization MAK – Interstate Aviation
Committee. MAK is in possession of diplomatic
privileges, that is why it has a right to treat Polish and
Russian Attorneys equally.

So if Mr Yuri Chaikha had not any legal reasons, what

kind of reasons directed him to the statement above?
Only political reasons. Please notice that “black boxes’”
recordings are one of the most important evidence,
concerning official version of the catastrophe, so an error
of the crew, landing in heavy fog, poor visibility,
probably forced by president Mr Lech Kaczynski. This
irrational, but most popular and underpinning the
disinformation campaign version is not only the most
well-known, but also widely confirmed (officially and
unofficially) both by Polish and Russians ruling
politicians and media as the most probable.

A strategy of shifting in the time a publication of the

Cockpit Voice Recordings was reasoned, not by works,
but by presidential campaign considerations, because if
the official version is evidenced, Mr Jaroslaw Kaczynski,
opponent of ruling party candidate, Mr Bronislaw
Komorowski, would discredited by this version, as a
twin-brother of president who indirectly killed 96 people.
Finally, reality was not so brutal, because published
transcripts not fully confirmed official version, but due to
disinformation campaign, as a base of the presidential
campaign Mr Bronislaw Komorowski won the election

and became new Polish President. Mr Jaroslaw
Kaczynski had been defeated, and his person in many
aspects became a modern analogy of Mr Robert Francis
Kennedy, who stands for the White House after his
brother’s, Mr John Fitzgerald Kennedy assassination.
There were be only one difference, 2010 campaign made
Kaczynski politically beaten – the 1968 campaign made
Kennedy killed. He died on the 5

of June of 1968.

Moreover, 7 month passed from death of Mr J.F.

Kennedy to death of Mr R. F. Kennedy. From death of
Mr Kaczynski passed to now only less than four month.
That is why if we were Mr Jaroslaw Kaczynski, we
would cease to travel by plane and request a Police
security to responsible for our residence prosecution.

Nevertheless, many weeks before the presidential

campaign started, disinformation managers were doing
preparations to the Preliminary Report of MAK, the
biggest and the best-transmitted event in the
investigation.

The second stage of disinformation game had been

now started. Please notice, that due to the previously
publications, the public opinion was rather directed to
believe the official version, than disinformed. That is
why to do not show conclusions between media
campaign and official statements of MAK disinformation
changed into misinformation, into disorientation
campaign, targeted to confused people. Confused
peopled can more successfully believe in the clear,
credible, serious, official report of MAK.

Moreover, a week forgetfulness of the previous

statements can make them lie on the depth of people

mind, who were much excited by new, sensational and
spectacular statements. In such situations previous
informations became operate at the subconscious.

A person confused respecting circumstances and

causes of the disaster, subconsciously remembering that
it could be a pilot error, than exhaustively informed in the
preliminary report, full of new details will be perfectly
directed in the next (but not last) stage of the
disinformation – the presidential campaign. Please notice
that people subjected to disinformation stayed in
mourning after a national tragedy yet. That is why it was
easier to effect on them.

Please imagine (although it is completely impossible in

the reality), how would you feel, if Her Majesty
Elizabeth II, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, First See
Lord, Admiral Sir Mark Stanhope, Royal Air Force Chef
of the Air Staff Air Chief Marshal Sir Stephen Dalton,
Chef of the General Staff, Gen. Sir David Richards,
along with governor of Bank of England Mr Mervyn
King, 7 British crew members and nearly 90 other people
including World War II combatants and national heroes
were killed during one occurrence. Of course such
tragedy will never be happened, we should hope so, but
please only imagine what was a scale of disaster, which
hurt Polish people.

We can now visualize feelings, emotions of people.

That is why it was easier to effect on them.

In order to start such disinformation process, process of

effecting on people, RMF FM, one of the most popular
radio station and wp.pl web portal announced around six
o’clock am as following:

“The fifth voice in voice in the cockpit belonged to a

woman!

An information about recording by the black boxes, the

fifth voice reported on Wednesday TVN-24 and RMF FM.
Both stations relied on an anonymous source in Polish
prosecution.

Reporters of RMF FM found, that the fifth voice

recorded, by the recorders saving conversations in
cockpit of the presidential aircraft, is a voice of woman.

At the moment, however it is not still known to whom it
precisely belonged.

A flight crew of Tu-154 consists of four people – a

pilot, co-pilot, navigator and mechanic. At the end of the
flight to the cockpit had the right to enter only three flight
attendants and a member of the Government Security
Bureau.

Shortly after the catastrophe of presidential aircraft

appeared speculations that somebody could exert
influence onto the pilots, to land on the airfield in
Smolensk. Media recalled situation from a few years ago,
when during a visit to Georgia pressured the pilots, to
make the plans and land directly in Tibilisi.

So far, causes of catastrophe of Tu-154 in Smolensk on

the 10

of April, where 96 people were killed are not

known.

On the board were among the others president Lech

Kaczynski with his wife, the last president in exile
Ryszard Kaczorowski and commanders of the all military
formations.”

http://wiadomosci.wp.pl/kat,1342,title,Piaty-glos-w-

kokpicie-nalezal-do-
kobiety,wid,12237396,wiadomosc.html

This article refers to publications of already mentioned

TVN-24 and RMF FM, concerning the fifth voice in
cockpit from the 5

of May. Publications from 5

of May

and morning of 6

May pave the way for rarely huge

wave of speculations, a basis of current described above
stage of disinformation game.

Please notice that quoted above article contains in its

structure two substantial manipulations. Firstly, not
nameless “media”, but no one else, than “Gazeta
Wyborcza” “recalled situation from a few years ago”.

http://wyborcza.pl/1,75478,7808706,Incydent_gruzinski.
html

Secondly, it is not officially confirmed fact, that Mr
Kaczynski in that days pressured pilots. Moreover then
the flight plan had not been changed – an aircraft did not
fly directly to Tibilisi, Georgia, but as in flight plan, took
off to Ganja, Azerbaijan. It is necessary to add, that the
“recalled” incident took place not airborne, but on the
airfield in Symeropol, Ukraine, before the take off in
flight to rapt by war Georgia.

As it was reported on 7

of May so about 24 hours

later, that not a woman but Mr Mariusz Kazana, a
Director of Diplomatic Protocol in Foreign Affairs
Ministry. It is not surprising, that it had been reported by
“Gazeta Wyborcza” jointly and in consultation with
TVN-24, RMF FM, onet.pl, wp.pl. This information was
of course in mass quoted by nearly all web portals, all the
TV and radio news – all the mainstream media. Please

notice that all these titles had already taken leading part
in disinformation campaign.

“Gazeta Wyborcza” as always used the top-flight

formulations showing the highest standards of
journalistic ethics. Manifestation of this objectivity was
however only the title in form of question “Fifth voice in
cockpit, director Kazana?”.

http://wyborcza.pl/1,75478,7851954,Piaty_glos_w_kokpi
cie__dyrektor_Kazana_.html

And then stated as following: ”Smolensk investigation.

The evidence in case of aircraft catastrophe is collected.
It is only necessary to confirm identification of the voice
of one of the persons recorded in cockpit of machine.
According to our information, it belongs to Mariusz
Kazana – chef of diplomatic protocol.”

Please notice, that minister of interior of Republic of

Poland Mr Jerzy Miller, quoted by “Gazeta Wyborcza”
stated officially, as if he wanted to stoke media
speculations.

Conspicuously visible is a precision synchronization of
Mr Miller with disinformation processes conducted by
media. Another words disinformation on this stage, like
previously is mosaic of medial speculations and official
statements of both parties – Russian and Polish. (here
statements of Mr Yuri Chaikha and Mr Jerzy Miller).

Please also notice, that the article of “Gazeta

Wyborcza” seems to be comparable with reality, because
CVR transcripts confirmed, that Mr Kazana entered the
cockpit. Nevertheless, please analyze one statement from
the article: “The official asked crew if everything is going

according to the plan and if delay should be reckoned –
relates our source in Ministry of Interior”. This stays in
conflict with CVR transcripts. Mr Kazana did not ask (on
his own), but had been informed by the Pilot-In-
Command (probably via an on-board intercom), that it
was not possible to land under those conditions. Mr
Kazana several minutes later informed Pilot-In-
Command that president had not been yet decided, what
to do farther (what alternative airport choose). A
classical disinformation clause is clearly visible – an
anonymous source.

After this article, disinformation direction in media had

been clearly defined.

Nevertheless, very as very surprising can be described

maintenance of Col. Edmund Klich, a self-styled Polish
representative in Russian investigation of MAK,
Moscow. His statements were perfectly synchronized
with medial informations. On the 6

of May, his

metamorphose was clearly visible.TVN-24 reported as
following on the 6

of May 2010:

“Yesterday we were a suppliant, today is already

perfect?

Edmund Klich changed his mind – say the Russians.
He as first loudly pealed that on own wish we put
ourselves in a role of suppliant and relied on the mercy
of the Russians. Edmund Klich was repeating after the
catastrophe of Tu-154, that in Russia dominated great
chaos. Two weeks were enough, to Head of State
Commission of Air Accident Investigations changed his
mind diametrically. (…)

However now, as informs Russian Interstate Aviation
Committee (MAK) in official statement (…) on a working
meeting of Technical Commission of MAK, whit Poland-
formed commission was to say, that ‘Works of technical
commission are provided according to international
standards, appointed by Annex 13

to the Chicago

Convention, which allows an independent and objective
work’.”

http://www.tvn24.pl/0,1655117,0,1,wczoraj-bylismy-
petentem--dzis-jest-juz-idealnie,wiadomosc.html

However, this changing of one’s mind was not the

only, concerning Col. Klich. His behaviour on the 8

May seemed to be unethical. Col. Edmund Klich stated,
according to RMF FM, as following:

1. “I can suppose or actually I know, to whom can

belong the fifth voice recorded by recorder
installed in cockpit of Tu-154, which crashed on
the 10

of April.”

2. “Voice will be identified on Sunday” [9

of May]

3. “In fact in background is the fifth voice, but I

didn’t hear it, when I was hearing out tapes. In
cabin is noise of engines, of fans, sometimes even
voices of crews aren’t fully clear. Only specialists
with right tackle reduce noises and detect
details.”

4. “In Moscow is a person, who has to verify to

whom belongs voice. Exactly I find out who
should identify him. (...) I got very short fragment
of the recording. There were several statements, I
don’t know what was later and what before. I had
to only fix the person, who will help to identify the

voice. On Sunday probably it will be known to
whom belonged the fifth voice in the cabin.”

http://www.rmf24.pl/raport-lech-kaczynski-nie-zyje-
2/kaczynski-fakty/news-edmund-klich-byc-moze-w-
niedziele-zostanie-rozpoznany,nId,276588

After an analyze of the speech of Col. Edmund Klich it

is clearly visible, that he was probably not talking truth
all the time. Please notice, that according to CVR
transcripts there were three so-could “fifth voices”,
belonging to Ms Barbara Maciejczyk, flight attendant,
probably to Mr Mariusz Kazana and last belonging
probably to Gen. Andrzej Blasik. No one talked several
statements as announced Col. Klich. Please also notice
that he did not say anything more than media that is why
his only target was probably to strengthen
disinformation. Moreover, the same day, so on the 8

May 2010 Col. Klich was no less talkative in TV TVN-
24, a very well deserved resonator in previous
disinformation processes. According to TVN-24 Col.
Klich stated as following:

http://www.tvn24.pl/0,1655478,0,1,piata-osoba-nie-
miala-wplywu-na-katastrofe,wiadomosc.html

1. “I saw a list, which terms as a tenth of a second

correspondence and conversations. There are still
several dozen of brackets.” Col. Klich was
probably talking about the CVR transcripts, in a
form of table, showing correspondence and
conversations of the crew. Incomprehensible
statements are marked by brackets in CVR.

2. “Commands incomprehensible, which still need

explain, because they can have an influence on

action of the crew”. – Col. Klich clearly
suggested, that there have been some commands
that could alter crew activities.

In these simple statements, although a little bit non-

grammatical, Col. Klich showed clearly, that he is only a
part of disinformation campaign.

His words, although had form of suggestion,
unconfirmed, unofficial information, fuelled significantly
embers of media speculations. The message resonated by
Col. Edmund Klich was clear: I know recorded crew
conversations. There were commends, that probable
influenced the crew.

In the same interview, Klich announced also that: “It

was not a fault or attempt”. He expressed a hundred
percent sure, that is was not any of this two causes.
Therefore, it was a pilot error as indicates an official
version.

On the 9

of May situation became quite clear – no

public opinion reaction on the news of Col. Klich – enter
on the misinformation stage was successful.

On the 10

of May Major Alexander Khoronchik,

former Russian Air Force pilot, Smolensk Air Base
service worker, who had found a national emblem from
the presidential aircraft said about circumstances of the
catastrophe, that “Telling about pilot’s error is an
insult”. However, no mainstream media quoted his
statement. It appeared only on low-rating website
niezalezna.pl (

http://niezalezna.pl/article/show/id/33998

May however was the time of disinformation

offensive, witch should be a base for MAK preliminary

report, issued on the 19

of May and signed by Mrs. Gen.

Tatiana Anodina (Head of the Interstate Aviation
Committee – MAK), Mr Alexei Morozov (Head of the
technical commission of the MAK) and Mr Edmund
Klich (self-styled Polish representative, imported by Mr
Morozov from Poland, not respecting international
aviation law).

Speculations concerning the fifth voice in the cockpit

as well as pilot’s error had reached their apogee about 4-
5 days before the official MAK briefing, and after this
time transformed into smaller maintenance dose.

The biggest scale of the disinformation is visible in an

article from opinion-forming “Rzeczpospolita” (“The
Republic”) from the 14

of May 2010.

The article titled “Catastrophe in 36. Regiment”

http://www.rp.pl/artykul/68342,479922_Katastrofa_w_3

6__pulku_.html

) is very similar to MAK preliminary

report and is one of the publications evidencing more
disinformation activity before the MAK publication,
which indicates on the connections between MAK and
disinformation coordination. Please look at following
fragments of the article:

1. “The crew which was flying together second time

in life” – This is a typical manipulation. Please
notice that pilot-in-command and co-pilot have
been training and flying together for over 20
years (since aviation high school, where they
were flying Cessna-size aircraft, than jets in the
Air Force Academy and passenger aircrafts
commonly for 13 years).

2. “None of the pilots had the certificate to carry out

conversations with the tower in Russian.” – such
certificates do not exist, so it was not possible for
the crewmembers to have them.

3. “Never before had not trained together an

emergency situation in a flight simulator” – last
time trained in 2010, just before the catastrophe,
according to Gen. Czaban, Polish Air Force.

4. “The media named the crew of the feral flight

<<elite of the Polish Aviation>>. The truth is that
they were young, talented soldiers, but their
experience is not breathtaking.” – Media refers to
low-circulation far right magazines. As in a
military aviation (were every flying hour is much
more difficult than in civil aviation: flights during
to war zones, to Africa, Afghanistan, Iraq, VIP
flights, long oversea routs, flying by unsafe,
Russian aircraft) the aircrew experience was
“breathtaking”.

On the 18

of May PAP had announced, that on the

of May 2010 (Wednesday), there would be a press

briefing of Interstate Aviation Committee in Moscow. As
it later happened.

2.8

Everything was beautiful, only the pilots are

guilty…

Transcripts, found by us in one of the ring binders

describe a situation that had happened on the 19

May, and was completely identical with a recording we
had watched hour earlier. So, Moscow, huge, beautiful

conference room. Everything was beautiful. Many
journalists, one born every minute. A kind of respect is
possible to detect for Gen. Anodina among the
journalists. If we had Disinformation Awareness
Warning System (or Enhanced Disinformation Proximity
Warning System), it would scream as loud as it could be
possible. It would surely detect following factors:

1. In contrast to every other so huge

conference there were not flashes
lighting, every second (was it a sacrum
or photographers ban? Well there was
live TV transmission in Poland,
according to PAP), the journalists were
unbelievably calm and polite – did not
attack by a strike of questions, as they do
normally.

2. Questions to Mrs. General neither from

Russian nor from Polish were difficult –
only one planted the thrust of MAK – a
journalist of Gazeta Wyborcza asked the
empress of Soviet aviation about the
certificates of MAK and her pilot-
blaming strategy after each air disaster.
However, she was perfectly prepared –
answered also perfectly. It looked like
had been previously agreed.

3. Consensus politics of Polish self-styled

representative (had been requested to
came Russia not by Polish government,
but by Mr Morozov, friend and deputy of
Gen. Anodina). He was quiet and mousy.
One of the journalists asked him a

question, but Mrs. Anodina said as real
empress: “I will answer, Mr Klich can
speak later!”.

4. Not completely preliminary report was

published during the briefing, but only its
fragments – separated elements.

5. The document (official preliminary

report) was not shown.

After the briefing on the website of MAK all, the text

appeared of course in Russian language only. There had
been three people present behind a big table in MAK
conference room: Mrs. Anodina, Mr Morozov and Mr
Klich. Nevertheless, the preliminary report is parted on
two. One of the sections is signed by Gen. Anodina,
second one by Mr Morozov. There is not any section or
even a fragment issued by Mr Klich.

We can state, that we probably never have seen a

document less truthful, although we had already been
analyzing Russian disinformation processes concerning
airspace disasters. Following fragments are not
comparable with the reality or self-conflicted:

1. “With a conviction, I declare that all the

circumstances and causes of the disaster
will be determined objectively and
transparently. The basis for this is that
the Russian and Polish governments have
decided to examine the plane crash Tu-
154 of Polish Ministry of Defense
[originally: MinDefense], which was
flying on an international route with
passengers on board, in accordance with

international principles of the Chicago
Convention, which ratified the 190
countries, including Russia and Poland.”
T. G. Anodina. – Please notice, that there
are two self-conflicted statements in this
fragment: Chicago Convention does not
refer to military aircraft – no military
aircraft catastrophe in the history had
been examined according to the Chicago
Convention. General however stated, that
the aircraft had been a property of Polish
Ministry of Defense so – a military
aircraft.

2. “For the implementation of the

Convention on the independence of the
investigation, it is important that the
investigation is conducted by an
international organization, which is
guided by norms of international law and
has extensive experience of international
investigations in 53 countries
worldwide.” – T.G. Anodina, but about
“international” character of MAK she
stated once again: “MAK Technical
Commission, consisted of specialists of
the Ministry of Defense of Russia, works
closely with a large group of Polish
military and civilian experts, the Polish
Plenipotentiary Mr. Klich at the head.” –
MAK does not respect any international
standard, because all the members of the
technical commission examining the

catastrophe are representing military of
Russia! Moreover large group, gen.
Anodina was talking about consists of
two people - Mr Waldemar Targalski
(pilot) and Mr Slawomir Michalak
(expert), according to Col. Miroslaw
Grochowski, Ministry of Defense Flight
Safety Inspectorate (quoted by Gazeta
Wyborcza).
(

http://wyborcza.pl/1,76842,8066385,Za

gadki_na_zoltych_karteczkach.html

www.sfora.pl/Piloci-Zaloga-Tu-154-za-

3. “We highly appreciate the fact that the

beginning of the investigation, we have
the support of colleagues from the United
States, European Union countries who
have declared that they did not question
the independence, objectivity and
professionalism of our Commission.”
T.G. Anodina – us, as well as Google,
Bing, AltaVista and British experts asked
by us do not know anything about such
“declarations”. Moreover before the
catastrophe, as well as after opposite
statements appeared in USA and EU.
MAK did not benefit any support from
European Experts (Americans are
examining own-made devices, but also
here objectivity is low, because this
examination is to be carried out by… the
producer)

4. “Since the first day of Polish specialists

have been involved in all aspects of the

investigation, and have had access to all
necessary materials, both at the scene of
the event, and the deciphering of the
<<<black boxes>>>” T.G. Anodina –
that is not truth, Polish experts did not
receive Air Traffic Control recorder and
transcripts, did not receive testimonies of
a crew of Russian aircraft, did not talk
with air controllers, do not know
anything about the radar and other
airport’s equipment details. Polish
experts (or even prosecutors, officers,
diplomats) were not present during 95
medical examinations of passengers and
crew members, Polish representative Mr
Klich at the time of conference and much
later did not know all the cockpit voice
recording and did not receive
documentation found in the aircraft. Mr
Klich did not watch official crash
animation.

5. “Comes to an end analysis of the data

from conducted by the Technical
Commission test flight to research all the
flight aids of the airport, including
landing radio equipment and other
materials, obtained by deciphering the
object control devices.” – This statement
of Mrs. Anodina completely discredits
MAK – the airport was examined by a
commission consisted by the Russian
military specialists, so representatives of

airport’s owner. That is why results of
their work cannot be objective, due to
conflict of interest.

6. “The work on deciphering conversations

crew members had been completed
commonly. Identification of their voices
was carried out by Polish pilots.” – That
is not truth, Mrs. Anodina forgave to add,
that “the pilots” refers to one and alone
Lt.-Col. Bartosz Stroinski, who moreover
did not authorize the identification by his
signature. According to Russian and
Polish law, the voice identification is
invalid.

7. “Work was impeded by a high-level of

the noise, including going thought the
opened door of the cockpit.” Cockpit
Voice Recorder transcripts clearly
indicates, that during approach cockpit
door was closed (it will be evidenced in
farther sections). This statement can be
furthermore cased only by a terrible
insolence of Mrs. Anodina or a kind of
mistake, which however discredits MAK
corpulently.

8. „In order of cleaning the record from

noise special apparatus owned by the
MAK with unique software were used.
The voices of the members of the crew
have been exactly identified.” – as it
appeared later, after transcripts’
disclosing that this statement of Mrs.

Anodina was not truth – 34% of
crewmembers voices were unidentified.
Moreover, Russian “unique software”
left in the transcripts 143 unreadable
statements and expressions in 37 minutes
recording. No comments need.

9. “It was found out, that in the cabin were

another persons, not the members of the
crew. The voice of one of them precisely
identified, the voice of another (or
others) is subjected to additional
identification by the Polish side. This is
important for the investigation.” – In the
transcripts published later, but preferred
before the conference, both voices had
been already identified. Nothing
indicates, that any of these voices had
any importance. Probably Mrs. Anodina
tried to suggest, that Mr Lech Kaczynski
forced landing on the pilots.

10. “In the laboratory, a research centre in

the U.S. with the participation of MAK’s
and Polish specialists, with the
participation of the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
in the framework of our bilateral
agreement with the U.S. has been
deciphered the information system of the
Terrain Awareness and Warning System
TAWS and satellite navigation system
GNSS. Specialists began to analyze the

results.” – before and later MAK stated,
that this devices had been send to the
producer, Universal Avionics of Tucson,
US, so please notice, although Mrs.
Anodina barely able to name all the
institutions taking part in the examination
did not stated, that “the specialists” refers
to Universal Avionics workers, whose
work can not be objective due to a
conflict of interest.

11. “In the unit lacks of a detailed program

crews’ preparation. Not performed
regular periodic training on the
simulator in order to develop habits of
cooperation and technology work of the
crew, in case of special events during the
flight.” – According to Gen. Czaban,
Polish Air Force crew was training on
flight simulators – last time in 2010. It
would be a wrong way to act as a
solicitor of the 36

Regiment, because of

their negligence, but crew-training
program exists in the unit, according to
their officers.

12. According to Mr Morozov, flying

experience of the crewmembers was less
than in reality (concerning all the
crewmembers).

Mr Morozov also stated and wrote that all of the

devices of the aircraft as well as the engines were
working perfectly until the ground impact. The airfield

according to Morozov was perfectly prepared, what
clearly contrasts with the truth.

The preliminary report of MAK started a wave of

speculations, especially due to a statement of Mr
Morozov concerning turning of the autopilot only 5-4
seconds before the trees impact. This statement is in
some measure (not completely) comparable with the
MAK’s transcripts prepared using “unique software”,
where all the voices are “exactly identified”, excluding
unidentified of course.

2.9

The truth is covered. Farther indoctrination.

To describe disinformation process it had been

necessary to chose only 60 days, but it seems to be
enough to prefer surely full and clear description of the
disinformation, which will indicate whether Russia is
guilty of the air disaster. To perform such analyze, before
this stage a basic work should be to translate and analyze
512 pages of the documentation – press articles and TV
news transcripts. To be sure, that we fully understand all
the problems we also researched Flight Management
System UNS-1D operational manual and a manual of the
aircraft Tupolev-154M – nearly 1000 pages of
documentation, but of course, it was not a titanic work,
because it was not obligatory to study all the manual
pages as strictly as the press articles. Moreover, many
pages of the Tu-154M instruction consist of draws in
contrast with press articles, analyzed by ourselves in text-
only version. On this stage, we had already researched
1400-1500 A4 pages.

On the 20

of April appeared many opinions in media

concerning flight on the autopilot up to trees impact. For
example, business portal sfora.pl announced “Pilots:
Crew of Tu-154 switched the autopilot off too late”.
Portal makes use from the statement of the pilot Dariusz
Sobczynski, who without complex data and not waiting
for the final report suggested, that the crew tried to land
on the autopilot. (

pozno-wylaczyla-autopilota-a20355

Also on the 20

of April 2010, Gazeta Wyborcza

quoted Lt. Artur Wosztyl, pilot-in-command of another
Polish Air Force Flight - PLF-044, who had called PLF-
101 just before they crashed. According to Lt. Wosztyl,
the Air Traffic Control had to close the airport, but not
this statement was keynote of the Gazeta Wyborcza
article, but the fact, that PLF-044 informed PLF-101
three times about poor weather conditions and
recommended flying to an alternative. This became a
base of the medial allegations against the pilot Capt.
Arkadiusz Protasiuk, that he “landed” although 3 times
had been warned about meteo conditions. Lt. Wosztyl
added also, that PLF-101 was not landing but only
performing an approach, not going to descend below the
minimal safety altitude of 330 ft.

According to Lt. Wosztyl air traffic controllers did not

probably know, that Tu-154M had crashed, because a
man, who left the tower said, that the aircraft “flown
away”.

http://wyborcza.pl/1,75478,7912876,Pilot__Mowilem

_im_o_zlych_warunkach_w_Smolensku.html

http://www.tvn24.pl/1,1657127,druk.html

The biggest Polish information TV – TVN-24

suggested that the pilots ignored weather reports and
Terrain Awareness Warning System: “Pull up! Pull up!”
commands, just after a visit of Polish Air Force head –
Gen. Andrzej Blasik. This suggestion had as a target
evidencing that it was a forced landing – forced by Mr
Lech Kaczynski and Gen. Blasik. Please however notice,
that estimate time of Gen. Blasik’s visit in cockpit was
(in contrast to TVN analyze) only 10 seconds and he did
not say anything to the pilots or any other crewmember.

Of course, it would not be a good idea to paste here

500 pages of documentation, because the lecture would
became even more boring, than it is now. However, the
20

of April was a specific and significant day that also

one article should be described. On the 20

of April

Polish Press Agency PAP forwarded to all the web
portals (that published it on their front-pages or in the
best exposed available place) and TV stations an article
from Russian Kommersant also blaming the pilots and
completely not compatible with the reality. Tactics of
disinformation on the 10

of April were to strike public

opinion by lots of different articles describing thousands
of versions showing unreal circumstances, but every time
blaming pilots. Many self-conflicted versions appeared –
but every one in mains stream media (TV, radio, most
popular dailies) concerned the pilot error.

Kommersant quoted by all the Polish news TV
stations stated as following:

1. “Russian experts are convinced that the

Tu-154M crash occurred, due to

inexperience of the presidential pilot, who
wishing to fulfil the request of the officials
agreed on lethal landing, and then,
listening to the navigator, made fatal
errors in the piloting” – Russian and
Soviet experts many times were already
convinced of something, but history
verified their false theories about the air
disasters.

2. According to Kommersant “commands of

the controller were little bit to late”, but he
“not keep up with reading meanings
because of too high speed descent of the
machine”. – He was using Precision
Approach Radar; such situation could not
take place.

3. „The first error consisted in the fact that

the commander, performing imprecision
approach to landing, turned on the
autopilot system, you absolutely should not
do.” According to operational manual of
Tu-154M, that Russian experts have not
probably redden, or already forgotten –
when the GPS is available crew should use
autopilot, just like PLF-101! Also retired
Polish Airlines pilot, Mr Janusz
Wieckowski (19.000 flying hours
experience on inter alia Boeing B-767 and
Tupolev Tu-154M) states clearly that using
of the autopilot was not prohibited.

4. “After entering the glideslope on which

according to his calculations should

descent the machine, the commander
entered to the autopilot descending rate of
4m/s and begun landing, thinking, that the
gear would touch down the threshold of
the runway” - It is not truth, because in
Tu-154M not a descending rate but an
angle (from 21

descending to 29

ascending) can only be entered to the
autopilot ABSU-154-II (using a shifter).
Moreover, – in conflict with Kommersant
insinuations - the pilot ceased descending
on the decision level of 100m (ft330).

5. “Meanwhile, the navigator was controlling

the altitude using a radio altimeter - the
instrument setting out the distance from the
ground on the basis of reflection from the
surface of the radio signal.” – This is a
basic lie started by Kommersant, and
repeated hundreds times by Polish and
Russian media. According to CVR
transcripts, the navigator was using only
the barometric altimeter.

6. “Role in the fatal crash - according to the

experts - has played a gently sloping, long
ravine, deep on about 40 meters, located in
front of the airport and the inexperience of
the navigator.” – It is not a fact, because
the navigator should not have any
experience to be able to correctly read the
altimeter. In addition, this insinuation was
basic for farther disinformation – “they
dived into the gorge, they were descending

[incorrectly] on the radio altimeter” –
media to be speaking. Nobody was able to
read the manual – Tu-154M autopilot can
only use barometric altimeter. It is
impossible to descent on the autopilot with
applied radio altimeter glidepath keeping.

7. “When the plane was flying above the

bottom of the ravine and the earth began to
flee down the navigator panicked and
began to inform the commander that they
were going above the course”. – It is not
truth, no such statement in CVR
transcripts. Moreover, the course is a
magnetic or geographical direction – so it
is possible to fly left or right off the course,
but not above.

8. “The commander believed his subordinate

and doubly increased descending rate.
Meanwhile the ravine ended and a long hill
appeared. And about excessive descending
rate pilots forgave” – This is impossible
for pilots to forgive about descending rate
– clearly visible on the all indicators.

http://www.tvn24.pl/1,1657106,druk.html

However, the problem is that, these completely absurd

theories had been stated by somebody who knows
nothing about flying and Tu-154M characteristics had
been published by the most opinion forming
Kommersant, read by Russian elite – lawyers, politics,
and doctors. Such serious newspaper would never print
so – the only one word is correct here - idiot opinion.
This one of the evidences, that disinformation processes

are conducted by authorities, forcing defined behaviour
on the editors, which in Russia is normal. Moreover, it
indicates that disinformation is coordinated by the
Russians.

On the 21

of April 2010 comparable with “The Sun”,

popular daily “Fakt” (pol. “Fact”, owned by German
Axel Springer Group), quoted Mr Vladimir Ivanov, who
was lying that he recorded the first film form the place of
the catastrophe. It was one of few persons, who said that
they are authors – but every of them say one thing:
“There were no shots on the recording and if even was
nobody was killed by Russians”, of course on this first
recording from the place of the catastrophe (14 minutes
after the terrain impact) there were three shots.

This aspect, of course commonly reported by the all-

mainstream media was prepared to evidence that it was
not an assassination.

On the 21

of April 2010 also echo of the words of Lt.

Wosztyl, MAK report and radio-altimeter using
hypothesis can be detected.

This was also a time of flooding, a tragedy, but making

able disinformation coordinators to stop their processes
(to not be diagnosed as a propaganda they should before
every bigger strike find or scatter substitution subject).

Also Polish self-styled Polish representative, Col.

Edmund Klich (do not mistake with Mr Bogdan Klich,
MD) suddenly appeared on the end of May, to show, that
he has a CVR transcripts, but he did not give it anybody
and did not disclose it. He wanted only to boast and next
time state, that it had been a pilot’s error.

http://www.fakt.pl/Zapis-czarnych-skrzynek-jest-juz-

w-Polsce-,artykuly,72644,1.html

http://dlapilota.pl/wiadomosci/polska/klich-

The number of publications concerning pilots’ error

suddenly decreased because the end on May Polish
interior minister Mr Jerzy Miler meet Mrs. Anodina in
Moscow and received his own CVR transcripts, but also
CVR audio on CD (still secret) and the most important
Flight Data Recorder parameters on CD (also still secret).

2.10

Self-styled but necessitating representative,

investigation who is who and notable so-called

“experts”.

Edmund Klich

“Yes, it was a pilot error”.

Edmund Klich

The 22

of May was not a flashpoint, but a

continuation of started processes. On the other hand, it
was also a time of great come back of Mr Edmund Klich.
According to Polish officers, Mr Klich requested to
Smolensk by Mr Alexei Morozov, came. There are many
self-conflicted versions of the work of Mr Klich.

However, that is a fact, that Mr Klich decided to

contact with journalists on the 23.04.2010 and stated as
following (

nie-musielismy-byc-petentem-rosjan

1. There was a chaos in Russian investigation.

2. Poland took a role of a petitioner in Russian

investigation.

3. He had been forced to co-operation with

prosecutors by the minister Klich, MD.

4. “I know what is the target and who is doing

clamour here. People who are guilty of the
catastrophe want to lay everything on the
pilots’ doors, but the cause was another. And
they [pilots] are only the last on the end of a
daisy chain taking errors of everybody.” –
had out Mr Klich with Klich, MD.

On the 6

of May 2010, Mr Klich had been requested

to the Commission of the Air Transport and Naval
Economy of the Parliament Infrastructure Commission,
to explain sense of his statement and submit a
clarification. He came.

http://smolensk-2010.pl/2010-06-

27-stenogram-z-przesluchania-edmunda-klicha.html

In his interrogation took part: Mr Cezary Grabarczyk,

minister of the infrastructure, Mr Tadeusz Jarmuziewicz,
deputy minister of the infrastructure, Mr Marcin Idzik
deputy minister of defense, Mr Henryk Litwin, deputy
minister of foreign affairs, Mr Maciej Krych, deputy
head of consular department of ministry of foreign affairs
and Gen. Anatol Czaban, head of training command of
the Polish Air Force Headquarters in Warsaw. President
of the commission (PTLiGM) – Mr Krzysztof
Tchorzewski of conservative Law and Justice, of dead
president (opposite to governing Civic Platform liberal
party of Mr Donald Tusk) was interrogation Mr Klich.
(Translation word-by-word)

Head of Commission: I ask Mr Representative of
Poland to introduce to today meeting.

Edmund Klich: First. I would like to state, that if some
dates won’t compatible,

I don’t have these notes

, that

would today be useful, so there any shifts of one day, or
the hours won’t be compatible, so please forgive. If there
will be questions in writing I can answer later.

HC: A mike, closer please.
EK: Excuse me, repeat or... (?)
HC: No.
EK: It was already understandable. Second. I want to
demarcate two concepts. If I will speak “examination” it
means that it is examination by commission either Polish,
or of Russian Federation. If I will speak “investigation”,
it means that it is an affair of the prosecution. And this
should be demarked, cause often this concepts are
mistaken and information chaos arises then and some
misunderstandings are due to this reason.

I'll start from the first information, about which – like
perhaps most of you – I know from media. Even called
also a son. He said: “Dad, do you know what is
happening?”. I turned on TVN-24, I see what is
happening, and as a result I started packing and I go to
Warsaw, because I knew already that can be legal
problem. Why? Because that aircraft is an aircraft - was
an aircraft of state aviation. The crew was military.

Therefore, it concerns the state aviation, which doesn’t
involve Annex 13 to the Convention of International
Civil Aviation.

(…)

So somewhere half away, perhaps in region of Garwolin,
cause I live in Deblin, and for weekends I go to Deblin,
in week or if necessary, I live in Warsaw, so there is no
here some problem of way in, to the place of accident or
aught.
Half away I received a call from Mr Alexei Morozov, this
is currently head of Commission of Russian Federation,
deputy of Mrs. Anodina – a head of <<Miezhnarodna
Aviatsionnaya Komisya…>> Committee, it means
International Aviation Committee Because that
Committee has bigger task than examination and
examination conducts in 12 countries of former Soviet
Union, it means every besides Baltic Countries.
He called me and told mine, that there is a catastrophe in
Smolensk, and he treats it as a telephone notification,
however official will be later. And there was at once
question about procedures, according to which will this
accident be examined.
He proposed Annex 13 to Convention, cause I think, that
according to his knowledge, and then my knowledge, it
was the only document, that signed Polish side, and
Russian Federation as a Chicago convention – so called
‘from ’44 year” .

Following facts are here interesting:

1. After a month of working Mr Klich did not even

know what is the name of Russian institution –
Interstate Aviation Committee – that Mr Klich
called in Russian word-by-word International
Aviation Commission (with an error in the first
word: exactly he said something like

“Intnational” or “Intenation”, not “International”),
which he interpreted in Polish: “International
Aviation Committee which still was incomparable
with real name. It means that:

a. Mr Klich cannot speak Russian.
b. Indolence of Mr Klich is clearly visible. If

he cannot determine what is the name of
commission he is cooperating with, he
will not be able to determine causes of the
air disaster. Moreover, he did not have an
access to own notes in Warsaw, it is
possible that he left it in Moscow.

2. Mr Klich did know perfectly that it is illegal to

examine (or investigate) Smolensk Air Disaster,
but after Morozov called he agreed to perform
such illegal steps.

3. Mr Klich had been requested by Morozov half

away to Warsaw from Deblin, Poland, so
according to Google Earth 40km from Warsaw,
he had been called by Mr Morozov.

Because statements of Mr Klich are extremely difficult

in perception, due to his specific language and grammar,
as difficult in sense-by-sense translation, as well in word-
by-word translation, his long testimony is abstracted in
paragraphs.

1. Mr Klich had arrived to the Ministry of

Infrastructure and was explaining minister, Mr
Grabarczyk what is Chicago Convention.

2. Then Mr Klich was watching TVN-24 news in

the ministry.

3. At 14:50, he received decision that he would fly

to Smolensk – he was on the list of passengers
of Mr Donald Tusk, prime minister.

4. He had arrived Warsaw Frederic Chopin

International Airport before the prime minister
and decided to departure by Yak-40 military
aircraft to Smolensk, without the prime
minister. Prime minister took off earlier, by a
civil aircraft. Mr Klich had been flying in
company of Mr Waldemar Targalski, who
according to him was able to identify voices in
the black box, as [former] Tu-154M pilot of the
36

Special Air Transport Regiment.

5. According to Mr Klich on the place of accident

it appeared that, they do not have visas, and
have to comply many formalities.

6. At 20:00, he had been finally allowed to view

place of the catastrophe. He was informed by
Mr Morozov and Mrs. Anodina, who welcomed
them that they already found the black boxes
and there have to be two Polish people – a pilot
and an expert necessary to examine recorders
(black boxes) in Moscow. Mr Klich decided to
send Mr Targalski, and a Head of Military
Aviation Institute, but he did not agree,
justifying, that better expert would arrive with
the prime minister.

7. Mr Tusk and other passengers of his aircraft,

including the expert were not stopped due to
formalities, like Mr Klich. Mr Tusk’s delegation
landed at Vitebsk, Belarus, had no any formal

problems on the airport and than on the Russo-
Belarusian border.

8. On the 11

of April, Mr Klich was documenting

place of the accident until afternoon, when huge
delegation of the flight safety inspectorate of
the Ministry of Defense arrived. It was about 20
people.

9. Mr Klich was managing all the activities on the

place of the air disaster, but organizational
problems he ceded on Col. Grochowski, from
the inspectorate.

10. On the Monday chef of Polish commission

became Col. Grochowski. Col. Klich however
forced on him being his deputy, claiming that
he knows Annex 13 in contrast to Col.
Grochowski.

11. Russian side had been represented in

negotiations with Mr Klich and Mr Grochowski
by Mr Morozov and a general who was a chief
of Russian commission, but Mr Klich does not
remember his surname! [According to
unofficial information, it was Aleksandr
Bastrykin].

12. Mr Grochowski proposed to be Poland

represented by 7 representatives, but Mr Klich
told him, that according to the Annex 13 there
could be only one representative, which can
have advisors.

13. Russians were not going to agree with the

proposition of Mr Grochowski. But Mr Klich
helped them stating that:

a. There can be only one representative.

b. Because the Chicago Convention and its

Annex 13 refers to civil aviation, Polish
representative should become a civil
person. Please notice, that Col. Klich
represents civil commission, he is not
military officer.

The negotiations have been ended without result. There

was no any agreement to use Annex 13 or to be Mr Klich
a Polish representative.

14. On the 13

of April, Mr Klich had been

requested to meet Prime Minister Col. Vladimir
Putin.

15. Mr Klich called Minister Cezary Grabarczyk

[the same who did not know what is a Chicago
Convention – it is terrible, because Mr
Grabarczyk is a lawyer. For example, one of us
feels that this Convention is known by him
perfectly.] Mr Grabarczyk did not permitted on
the meeting with Col. Putin, but also did not
prohibit it.

16. Mr Klich carried out a teleconference with:

a. Col. Vladimir Putin, prime minister of
Russian Federation

b. Mr Sergei Ivanov, deputy prime minister
of Russian Federation.

c. Gen. Tatiana Anodina, head of the
Interstate Aviation Committee [but also wife
of former prime minister, shareholder of the
second larger airlines in Russia, empress of
Soviet Aviation, professor of aircraft
designing, mother of one of wealthiest
Russians].

17. Col. Putin and Mrs. Anodina told Mr Klich that

they would proceed according to the Annex 13.

18. After the teleconference Mr Morozov designed

Mr Klich a representative of Poland stating: Now
you are the boss.

19. Mr Klich though that Mr Putin and Mrs.

Anodina before had consulted examining the air
disaster (or rather conducting the investigation)
according to the Annex 13, with the Polish
government and became a self-styled Polish
representative. MAK dismissed col. Grochowski
back home and Klich became an only leader of
Polish expert’s team – 20 workers of Col.
Grochowski and 1 worker of Mr Klich – Mr
Frydrych.

21. Mr Klich made Col. Grochowski his deputy,

although it is not normal practice in
investigations, to be conducted according to
Annex 13 of the Chicago Convention.

22. On the 15

of April Mr Bogdan Klich, MD

appointed official Polish commission to
explain the catastrophe and nominated all it’s
members Polish representatives, so did

not

agree to use Chicago Convention and Annex 13.

23. Mr Klich was nominated to be the chef of the

Polish commission.

24. Mr Klich argued with military attorney Gen.

Krzysztof Parulski (colonel and the time), because
Mr Morozov asked him how it was possible, that
an expert of Polish commission helped the
prosecution.

25. Mr Parulski told Mr Klich, that he was acting

to the detriment of Poland deciding to use Annex
13 However, Mr Klich extinguished his zeal,
asking if Mr Parulski could speak English of
Russian and how was he going to talk with Mr
Morozov, not speaking these languages.

26. “Mrs. Fiszer” from Polish Embassy in Moscow

took to Smolensk an interpreter… student of high
school, who should help in interpreting and
translating materials in one of the most important
investigations in last years of NATO and European
Union history.

The following conclusions come from the Mr

Klich’s interrogation.

1. Mr Klich perfectly knew that using Annex

13 in investigation, so examining on the civil
rules is illegal, because it was not civil but a
military aircraft.

2. Mr Klich was endeavouring to break the law

and conduct the investigation using Annex
13.

3. Mr Klich after becoming a head of Polish

commission betrayed state interest.

4. Russians were able to unbelievable simply

manipulate Mr Klich. He was not competent
even to guess, that if minister Grabarczyk
knew nothing about planes of meeting
Klich-Putin, Col. Putin had not previously
talking with Polish government about the air
disaster investigation plans.

5. Mr Klich consciously managed to decrease

number of Polish representatives to be the
only representative.

6. Working of Mr Klich in a light of his own

testimony, cover characteristics of the act of
the article 129 of Polish Penal Code, Who
being authorized to acting on behalf of
Republic of Poland, acts to the detriment of
Republic of Poland, is punishable from one
to ten years of imprisonment.

Because the acts of Mr Klich were inspired by the

Russians, who could control him like a child – it is
sure, those farther statements of him were also
inspired by the Russians.

However, that statement was very

interesting.

Please analyze his behaviour in a context

of the text above.

Statements and work of Polish self-styled
representative in Moscow Col. Edmund Klich

Date

Edmund Klich Behaviour

10.04.2010
-
22.04.2010

-Mr Klich requested by Russians to Russia
-Mr Klich has not any problems concerning co-
operation with Russians
-Mr Klich although had known, that it is illegal
managed to make wrong document legal base of the
investigation
-Mr Klich did not permit to carry out international
investigation, going to be the investigation
conducted according to Annex 13
-Mr Klich managed to become the only Polish
representative.
-Mr Klich received military experts group of Col.
Grochowski and became their new chef.
-Mr Klich in conflict with attorney Parulski, because
Russians (Mr Morozov) prohibited Klich to “lease”
Parulski a meteorologist “received” from Grochowski’s
commission.

-Mr Klich contacts with minister Klich, MD to
complain attorney Parulski, but vainly
-Mr Klich conquered in Russia role of the only
Poland’s representative
-Mr Klich dominated his concurrent Col. Grochowski
-Mr Klich defended himself from indictment of
attorney Parulski, because Parulski was depended from
his help in investigation works and… talking with Mr
Morozov, because speaks Polish only

http://zbigniewkozak.pl/?p=1220

23.04.2010

-Mr Klich criticises Polish negotiations with Russia
(please notice, that he took part in this
negotiations supporting Russians from MAK)
-Mr Klich reports, that Poland took “suppliant role”
in Russian investigation.
-Mr Klich accused guilty people of doing “clamour”.
-Mr Klich reported, that he knew what had happened
-

http://www.tvn24.pl/12690,1653371,0
,1,klich-nie-musielismy-byc-
petentem-rosjan,wiadomosc.html

06.05.2010

-Mr Klich expressed appreciation for the co-operation
with Russians. -

http://www.tvn24.pl/0,1655117,0,1,w
czoraj-bylismy-petentem--dzis-jest-
juz-idealnie,wiadomosc.html

08.05.2010

-Mr Klich reported about “the fifth voice in
cockpit”.
-He did not hear this voice in original CVR recording
-Mr Klich saw official crash animation.

http://www.rmf24.pl/raport-lech-
kaczynski-nie-zyje-2/kaczynski-
fakty/news-edmund-klich-byc-moze-w-
niedziele-zostanie-
rozpoznany,nId,276588

15.05.2010

-Mr Klich reported, that the official crash animation
did not answer what had happened (earlier he told
something opposite).
-There were 8 Polish experts in Moscow
-The investigation results would be known in a year.

http://www.rmf24.pl/raport-lech-
kaczynski-nie-zyje-2/kaczynski-

fakty/news-edmund-klich-odtworzono-
ostatnie-minuty-lotu-
prezydenckiego,nId,278212

19.05.2010

Official preliminary report

www.mak.ru

19.05.2010

-An information (not of Edmund Klich), that Gen.
Blasik had been present in the cockpit appears.
-Gen. Anodina reported, that affair of forced landing
would be examined yet.

http://www.tvn24.pl/0,1656971,0,1,p
ap-to-glos-generala-
blasika,wiadomosc.html

24.05.2010

According to Mr Edmund Klich (radio RMF FM, morning):
-There was a fifth person in cockpit at the moment of
catastrophe (not comparable with CVR)
-According to Annex 13

of Chicago Commission the

only authorized to publish any information is
international committee (this is an untruth, no any
international committee assumption in the annex)
-Mr Klich confirmed that did not know (after 1,5
month of investigation!) how does Tu-154M cockpit
look like (!).
-Mr Klich stated that he is not allowed to inform who
had been the fifth voice owner.
-Mr Klich stated that it was a fault of system.

http://www.rmf24.pl/opinie/wywiady/
kontrwywiad/news-edmund-klich-
katastrofa-smolenska-skutkiem-
wieloletnich,nId,279719

24.05.2010

TVN television, evening
-At the same day he disclosed that the fifth voice
was a voice of gen. Blasik, breaking his words from
morning.
-Mr Klich stated that it was a pilot error, breaking
his morning words.

http://www.tvn24.pl/0,1657727,0,1,k
lich-w-kabinie-pilotow-do-konca-
byl-gen-blasik,wiadomosc.html

1.06.2010

CVR transcripts disclosed

http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/2178777,

11,1,1,item.html

-No evidence of forced landing
-CVR transcripts seems to be dishonest

A table above completely disqualifies Mr

Klich. His own statements indicate that
he is not characterized by any
professionalism, self-restraint and
honesty. He seems to be unbalanced and
confused.

Col. Stefan Gruszczyk: it was a suicide!

Next days of the disinformation were full of the Polish

and Russian expert’s opinion.

Behaviour of Mr Stefan Gruszczyk should be also

described here, because this former pilot seems to be the
most immoral voice of the all criticizing PLF-101 crew.
There are several another experts taking probably the part
in disinformation, including for example Mr Tomasz
Hypki, Col. Piotr Lukaszewicz, Capt. Robert Zawada but
nobody had descended to mental level of Mr Gruszczyk.
That former pilot is commonly quoted by Polish
mainstream media as an expert, knowing himself as a
former commander of Tu-154M squadron – such
squadron however never existed…

For example:

1. RMF FM: “It was a nonchalant flight”, “the crew

was not harmonious”

http://www.rmf24.pl/opinie/wywiady/przesluchan
ie/news-stefan-gruszczyk-lot-tu-154m-byl-
nonszalancki-zaloga-nie,nId,284218

2. TVN-24: „It was a hazard, playing Lotto, suicide.

They broke rules written by blood.”

http://www.tvn24.pl/1,1658058,druk.html

Mr Gruszczyk on the 24

of May in TVN-24 had

been explaining mistakenly sense of command “Posadka
dopalnitielna” (landing conditionally), evidencing that
this command exists only in Russia, because there is a
possibility, that some aircraft had not left the runway (!).
He did not notice that aircrafts use runways not only in
Russia, so such argumentation should be missed.
Moreover, before this command Smolensk ATC reported
PLF-101 “runway is free” – it stays in conflict with Mr
Gruszczyk argumentation.

Moreover in a comment for Gazeta Wyborcza,

when accuse dead colleagues, he mistook Global
Positioning System (GPS) with Distance Measuring
Equipment (DME), stating that GPS is only additional
device helping in distance estimating. Please however
notice, that during approach in Smolensk GPS was basic
navigation form the autopilot to carry out approach.

In the same article Mr Gruszczyk was evidencing

not truthfully, that beacons has not any influence during
approach and 10 degrees beacon direction oscillation had
been correct (!). He also tried to justify Air Traffic
Control, full of mistakes.

http://wyborcza.pl/1,75478,8114173,Katastrofa_w_Smol
ensku__To_byl_lot_na_slepo.html

– please translate this

article via for example google translate. Only reading of
the manual can be recommended for Mr Gruszczyk.
However, a number of his statements in mainstream
media are unbelievable.

Tomasz Hypki and his boys

Tomasz Hypki is according to “Nasz Dziennik”

former WSI (military intelligence of Republic of Poland
before 2006, co-operating with Russian intelligence,
dealing guns, sponsoring mafia, training terrorists and do
not performing any intelligence role) co-operator.

http://www.naszdziennik.pl/index.php?dat=20100616&ty
p=po&id=po51.txt

He is not credible, because of his

statements concerning all modern Polish Air Force
equipment in his journal “Skrzydlata Polska”. Mr Hypki
many times tried to blame Polish pilots for the air
disaster performing disinformation in mainstream media
as well as in professional aviation press edited by him.
He also in many interviews tried to accuse for the air
disaster Polish Air Force or the pilots when it only was
possible (

http://www.bibula.com/?p=20420

Nevertheless not Mr Hypki, but his colleague and

subordinate Mr Wojciech Luczak evidenced that do his
best to blame the pilots and inculcate to public opinion,
that it was no a technical fault and not an assassination or
downing. In an interview from the 2

of June 2010 stated

shamelessly: “Pilots made all possible errors!”. As well
as he was talking about his hands shaking, when reading
the CVR transcripts. Mr Luczak was lying: There was a
chaos in cockpit! (…) Commander of the Air Force was
reading manual of wing mechanization! – Please notice
that it is a manipulation of facts, because such manual
does not exist. Mr Luczak performs also typical
manipulation concerning “Consultations with the
passengers” (there were people on the board who

according to procedures PIC had to inform about the
situation!) and “Lack of decision of the president”. Mr
Luczak tries to evidence, that the pilots were idiots and
Mr Kaczynski forced landing on them. He names Russian
MAK “International Commission” what is an absurd. He
also stated, that crew was inharmonious (he does not add,
that the pilots had been training in common for 21 years
and flying in common for 13 years), and of course the
aircraft was efficient.

http://www.se.pl/wydarzenia/opinie/zpiloci-poruszali-sie-
po-omacku_141424.html

Mr Luczak however should not be accused for anything,
because maybe the money, he received were for example
necessary for his family – in such situation he cannot be
accused. Due to this reason, the interview on Mr Luczak
is not suitable to be farther published. Please remember
that he is not an expert, although in mainstream media of
Poland introduces himself as an expert. For example, he
was evidencing after one of the Su-27 catastrophes that
“The speed was too high to inject” – this statement
completely discredits him, because in Su-27 it is possible
to inject with maximal airspeed.

Gen. Parulski

Gen. Krzysztof Parulski as Col. Krzysztof Parulski,

Head Military Attorney supervises Polish prosecutors
investigating Smolensk air disaster. He many times
appears in media, but if does not have any positive
information about work of Russians or new pilot error
evidence for example he rather prefers to talk via Col.

Zbigniew Szelag. Col. Szelag – spokesman of the
Military Attorney Office and Lt.-Col. Robert Kurpacz,
his equivalent in Air Force Command, are designated to
answer “dangerous” questions of the few, independent
reporters. For example in on the 12

of May 2010 in state

TV TVP at 22:55 (on first or second channel probably) a
reportage concerning Smolensk air disaster doubts had
been emitted – Lt.-Col. Kurpacz in the face of journalist
asking about aircraft’s unreasonable damage panicked
and was not able to ask reliably.

However, Mr Parulski is not a man to the dirty

work. He in spotless uniform stood near the wreckage
and stated: I had been sleeping only half an hour last 3
days – I was working so hard…

Nevertheless, not only insomnia makes Mr

Parulski even less credible than Mr Edmund Klich. His
CV crosses him out. He was born in 1957. According to
former Justice Minister Mr Zbigniew Ziobro, quoted by
Polish Newsweek on the 25

of February 2008