http://www.chesszone.org

Table of contents:

# 2, 2008

Our supporters:............................................................................................................ 3
News............................................................................................................................ 4
Games ....................................................................................................................... 10

Editorial staff: ............................................................................................................. 28

http://www.chesszone.org

Our supporters:

http://www.chesshouse.com/t.asp?a=452832

http://www.partypoker.com/index.htm?wm=3062517

Please conact us if you’re interested in advertising

chesszone@ya.ru

http://www.chesszone.org

News

Robert James Fischer 1943-2008

Robert James "Bobby" Fischer was born in Chicago, Illinois USA 9th March 1943 died in

Reykjavic, Iceland 17th January 2008 at the age of 64 of kidney problems. He achieved
international fame and notoriety at the height of cold war on the way to becoming World Chess
Champion in 1972.

Bobby Fischer learned his chess in Brooklyn New York at the age of 6. His progress at

first was not spectacular but by the age of 13 he, in his own words "got good". He became US
Junior Champion in 1956 and defended it the following year. Increasingly good results allowed
him entry to the 1958 Championships. In a shock result he won the first of his eight US
Championship titles (every time he entered) with 10.5/13, becoming in January 1958, at the age
of 14, the youngest US champion and with it he became an International Master (the youngest
at the time).

The match against Boris Spassky was at the height of the cold war and actually domi-

nated the news. Fischer it seemed got cold feet and made demands over the venue and the
prize fund. The venue was finally decided as Reykjavic and all seemed set. Then at the last
minute Fischer refused to travel unless the prize fund was increased London financier Jim Slater
added $125,000 to take the fund to a record $250,000. Fischer was still late, was defaulted
game one, the default was reversed and then Fischer lost when grabbing a pawn heshouldn't
have. Game two he did default when he claimed he could hear the cameras and that the
audience was too close. Just when people thought the match was over there was acompromise,
game three was in a table tennis room off the main venue with a close circuit camera. 2-0 down
Fischer played the Modern Benoni as black and won a smashing game.

Fischer was up and running and with wins in games 5,6, 8 and 10 had virtually secured

the title. Spassky's only win came in game 11 but a win for Fischer in game 13 restored a lead
that was never to be narrowed and the final score was 12.5 - 8.5. He had become the 11

World

Chess Champion at the age of 29 and the possibilities seemed limitless.

Fischer's greatness was the clarity, precision and beauty of his chess games, the battling

uncompromising nature he took to every tournament and match he ever played and the sheer
drama of his chess career. His personal demands and the way he raised the profile of chess led
to improved conditions for a whole generation that followed him. He took on the Soviet Chess
Machine virtually alone and won, at least over the board. It probably cost him everything else in
his life.

Leonard Barden in the Guardian

Stephen Moss in the Guardian

Corus Wijk aan Zee 2008, Netherlands (12.01 - 27.01)

The Corus Chess Tournament 2008 took place 11th-27th January 2008 in Wijk aan Zee.

Levon Aronian shared first place with rising star Magnus Carlsen. Levon had better tie-breaks.
The table of Corus A tournament listed below.

http://www.chesszone.org

Corus A Wijk aan Zee (NED), 12-27 i 2008 cat. XX (2742)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4
1. Aronian, g ARM 2739 * ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 0 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 8 2829
Levon
2. Carlsen, g NOR 2733 ½ * 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 1 1 1 ½ 8 2830
Magnus
3. Anand, g IND 2799 ½ 1 * 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 7½ 2794
Viswanathan
4. Radjabov, g AZE 2735 0 ½ 1 * ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 7½ 2799
Teimour
5. Leko, Peter g HUN 2753 ½ 1 ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 7 2770
6. Ivanchuk, g UKR 2751 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 7 2770
Vassily
7. Adams, g ENG 2726 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 ½ 6½ 2743
Michael
8. Kramnik, g RUS 2799 1 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ * 0 ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 6½ 2737
Vladimir
9. Topalov, g BUL 2780 0 ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 * ½ ½ 0 0 1 6 2710
Veselin
10. Polgar, g HUN 2707 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ * ½ 0 ½ 1 6 2716
Judit
11. Mamedyarov, g AZE 2760 ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ 1 ½ 6 2711
Shakhriyar
12. Eljanov, g UKR 2692 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 1 1 ½ * ½ 0 5 2659
Pavel
13. Van Wely, g NED 2681 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ * ½ 5 2660
Loek
14. Gelfand, g ISR 2737 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 0 ½ 1 ½ * 5 2655
Boris

Sergei Movsesian won Corus B with impressive +6 and will join main event next year.

Corus B Wijk aan Zee (NED), 12-27 i 2008 cat. XV (2618)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4
1. Movsesian, g SVK 2677 * ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 1 ½ ½ 1 1 9½ 2788
Sergei
2. Short, Nigel D g ENG 2645 ½ * ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 0 ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 8½ 2726
3. Bacrot, Etienne g FRA 2700 ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 8½ 2721
4. Harikrishna, P g IND 2664 ½ ½ ½ * ½ 1 ½ 0 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 7½ 2671
5. Nepomniachtchi, g RUS 2600 ½ ½ ½ ½ * 0 ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 7 2648
Ian
6. Cheparinov, Ivan g BUL 2713 ½ 0 ½ 0 1 * 0 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 1 6½ 2610
7. L'Ami, Erwin g NED 2581 0 0 ½ ½ ½ 1 * ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 0 0 6 2591
8. Smeets, Jan g NED 2573 0 0 0 1 1 1 ½ * 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ 0 6 2592
9. Hou Yifan wg CHN 2527 0 1 0 0 ½ ½ 0 1 * ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 6 2596
10. Stellwagen, g NED 2625 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ 1 1 6 2588
Daniel
11. Koneru, Humpy g IND 2612 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 0 ½ ½ * ½ 1 0 5½ 2561
12. Sargissian, g ARM 2676 ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ * 0 1 5 2526
Gabriel
13. Krasenkow, g POL 2636 0 0 0 ½ ½ 0 1 ½ ½ 0 0 1 * 1 5 2529
Michal
14. Spoelman, Wouter m NED 2424 0 ½ 0 0 0 0 1 1 ½ 0 1 0 0 * 4 2492

Corus C won by Fabiano Caruana, another rising star from Italy. He qualified for the

Corus B next year.

http://www.chesszone.org

Corus C Wijk aan Zee (NED), 12-27 i 2008 cat. X (2494)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4
1. Caruana, g ITA 2598 * ½ 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 ½ 1 1 1 10.0 2696
Fabiano
2. Reinderman, g NED 2533 ½ * ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 1 8.0 2577
Dimitri
3. Negi, g IND 2526 0 ½ * 0 1 0 1 0 ½ 1 1 1 1 1 8.0 2578
Parimarjan
4. Carlsson, m SWE 2501 0 0 1 * 0 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 7.5 2549
Pontus
5. Krush, Irina m USA 2473 1 ½ 0 1 * 1 1 0 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ 1 7.0 2524
6. Braun, Arik m GER 2536 0 ½ 1 0 0 * ½ 1 1 ½ 0 1 1 ½ 7.0 2519
7. Van der Wiel, g NED 2490 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ * 1 ½ 1 1 ½ 1 ½ 7.0 2522
John
8. Nijboer, g NED 2578 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 * 0 1 ½ ½ 1 1 7.0 2516
Friso
9. Van der Werf, m NED 2389 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ 1 * 1 1 ½ 0 ½ 6.5 2501
Mark
10. Li Shilong g CHN 2502 1 0 0 ½ 1 ½ 0 0 0 * 1 ½ 1 ½ 6.0 2463
11. Grivas, g GRE 2509 ½ ½ 0 ½ 1 1 0 ½ 0 0 * 1 0 1 6.0 2463
Efstratios
12. Peng Zhaoqin g NED 2461 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 * 0 1 4.5 2386
13. Ushenina, m UKR 2484 0 0 0 0 ½ 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 * 1 4.5 2384
Anna
14. Ruijgrok, NED 2329 0 0 0 0 0 ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 0 0 * 2.0 2210
Dennis

And last but not least event was the Honorary tournament. Ljubo Ljubojevic shows an

impressive form and won the competition with about 2700 perfomance!

Corus Honarary Wijk aan Zee (NED), 19-26 i 2008 cat. XIII (2560)
1 2 3 4
1. Ljubojevic, Ljubomir g SRB 2543 * * 0 1 ½ 1 ½ 1 4 2690
2. Timman, Jan H g NED 2561 1 0 * * ½ 1 ½ 0 3 2559
3. Korchnoi, Viktor g SUI 2605 ½ 0 ½ 0 * * 1 1 3 2544
4. Portisch, Lajos g HUN 2530 ½ 0 ½ 1 0 0 * * 2 2444

68th Armenian Championship. Yerevan, Armenia (08.01 - 21.01)

Karen Asrian edged out Artashes Minasian on tie-break after both finished on 8/11. Ashot

Anastasian withdrew after 8 rounds.

http://www.chesszone.org

68th ch-ARM Yerevan (ARM), 8-21 i 2008 cat. XII (2531)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3
1. Asrian, Karen g ARM 2621 * ½ 0 1 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ + ½ 8 2648
2. Minasian, g ARM 2578 ½ * 0 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 + 1 8 2652
Artashes
3. Ter-Sahakyan, f ARM 2369 1 1 * 0 1 ½ 0 0 1 1 ½ + ½ 7½ 2639
Samvel
4. Kotanjian, g ARM 2545 0 0 1 * 0 1 1 1 ½ 1 0 1 1 7½ 2625
Tigran
5. Petrosian, g ARM 2606 0 ½ 0 1 * 0 1 ½ ½ 1 1 1 1 7½ 2620
Tigran L
6. Andriasian, g ARM 2532 ½ ½ ½ 0 1 * ½ ½ ½ 0 1 + 1 7 2588
Zaven
7. Minasian, Ara g ARM 2466 ½ ½ 1 0 0 ½ * ½ ½ 0 1 + 1 6½ 2565
8. Lputian, Smbat G g ARM 2616 ½ ½ 1 0 ½ ½ ½ * 0 1 ½ 1 0 6 2524
9. Pashikian, Arman g ARM 2556 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 * ½ 1 0 1 6 2529
10. Babujian, Levon m ARM 2439 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 ½ * ½ 0 1 4 2414
11. Yegiazarian, g ARM 2512 ½ 0 ½ 1 0 0 0 ½ 0 ½ * 0 ½ 3½ 2374
Arsen
12. Anastasian, g ARM 2562 - - - 0 0 - - 0 1 1 1 * ½ 3½ 2370
Ashot
13. Nalbandian, g ARM 2505 ½ 0 ½ 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 ½ ½ * 3 2340

It Maalot-Tarshiha (ISR), 7-15 i 2008 cat. XV (2620)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
1. Smirin, Ilia g ISR 2616 * 1 ½ ½ 1 0 ½ ½ 1 1 6 2745
2. Postny, Evgeny g ISR 2627 0 * 0 ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 1 6 2744
3. Khenkin, Igor g GER 2602 ½ 1 * ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 1 ½ 5 2665
4. Roiz, Michael g ISR 2659 ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 5 2658
5. Avrukh, Boris g ISR 2628 0 0 ½ ½ * ½ ½ 1 1 1 5 2662
6. Gyimesi, Zoltan g HUN 2605 1 0 ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ 4½ 2621
7. Rodshtein, Maxim m ISR 2614 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ ½ 1 4½ 2620
8. Moiseenko, Alexander g UKR 2643 ½ ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ ½ * ½ 0 4 2574
9. Macieja, Bartlomiej g POL 2617 0 0 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ * 1 3 2495
10. Kogan, Artur g ISR 2591 0 0 ½ 0 0 ½ 0 1 0 * 2 2403

Keres Memorial. Tallin, Estonia (06.01 - 12.01)

The Keres Memorial took place in Tallinn, Estonia 6th-12th January 2008. Time control

90 min for 40 moves + 15 min for the rest of the game + 30 sec increment for every move played
starting from the first move. Vasily Yemelin won the GMA group with 6/9.

Paul Keres Mem GMA Tallinn (EST), 6-12 i 2008 cat. X (2490)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
1. Yemelin, Vasily g RUS 2562 * ½ 0 ½ 1 1 ½ ½ 1 1 6 2607
2. Rausis, Igors g CZE 2520 ½ * 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 5½ 2566
3. Sulskis, Sarunas g LTU 2553 1 0 * ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ ½ 5½ 2563
4. Kulaots, Kaido g EST 2533 ½ ½ ½ * 0 ½ 1 ½ 1 1 5½ 2565
5. Onischuk, Vladimir m UKR 2474 0 ½ 0 1 * ½ 0 1 1 1 5 2535
6. Kanep, Meelis g EST 2523 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ * ½ 1 ½ ½ 4½ 2486
7. Volodin, Aleksandr EST 2379 ½ 0 0 0 1 ½ * 1 ½ 0 3½ 2422
8. Gavrilov, Alexei1 m RUS 2491 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 0 0 * ½ 1 3½ 2410
9. Klovans, Janis g LAT 2447 0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ * 1 3½ 2415
10. Seeman, Tarvo m EST 2420 0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ 1 0 0 * 2½ 2332

XXXIII Abierto Internacional "Ciudad de Sevilla". Sevilla, Spain (05.01 - 12.01)

Karen Movsziszian took clear first on 7.5/9.

2nd ACP World Rapid Cup. Odessa, Ukraine (03.01 - 07.01)

http://www.chesszone.org

The event was a 16 player knockout. Teimour Radjabov overcame Alexander Grischuk in

a blitz playoff to win the final 2.5-1.5.

Time controls. 1st pair of games 20 mins+ 5 secs per move. Tie-breaks: If a match endws

in a draw (1-1), two additional blitz games were played. Time control 3 min+2 sec per move. If a
final tie-break was needed then a single blitz game where White has 5 mins and needs to win
the game in order to win the match. Black, with draw odds only had 4 minutes. This final tie-
break game was played without time increment.

1/8 final. Savchenko - Yakovenko 0-2. Radzhabov - Drozdovskii 1,5-0,5. Eljanov - Ivan-

chuk 0,5-1,5. Shirov - Inarkiev 0,5-1,5.

Shabalov - Svidler 0-2. Najer - Gelfand 0,5-1,5. Grischuk - Karpov 2,5-1,5. Polgar - Kar-

yakin 0-2.

1/4 final. Yakovenko - Inarkiev 1,5-0,5. Radjabov - Ivanchuk 3-2. Svidler - Grischuk 0,5-

1,5. Karyakin - Gelfand 3-1.

1/2 final. Radjabov - Yakovenko 2-0. Grischuk - Karyakin 3-2.
Final. Radjabov - Grischuk 2,5-1,5.

50th "Torneo di Capodanno". Reggio Emilia, Italy (29.12 - 06.01)

Zoltan Almasi won the competition with 6/9 half a point clear of the field. Gashimov won

the brilliancy prize for his win against Tiviakov (do not miss this game with annotations by IM
Anatoly Polivanov).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0

1. Almasi, Zoltan g HUN 2691 * ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 ½ 1 ½ 6 2752
2. Gashimov, Vugar g AZE 2664 ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ 5½ 2710
3. Ni Hua g CHN 2641 ½ ½ * ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 5½ 2713
4. Harikrishna, P g IND 2668 0 ½ ½ * 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 5½ 2710
5. Landa, Konstantin g RUS 2678 ½ ½ ½ 0 * ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ 4½ 2628
6. Korchnoi, Viktor g SUI 2611 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ * 0 ½ ½ ½ 4 2593
7. Navara, David g CZE 2656 0 0 ½ 0 ½ 1 * ½ ½ 1 4 2588
8. Tiviakov, Sergei g NED 2643 ½ 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ * 0 1 3½ 2552
9. Marin, Mihail g ROU 2551 0 ½ 0 ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 * ½ 3½ 2563
10. Godena, Michele g ITA 2535 ½ ½ ½ 0 ½ ½ 0 0 ½ * 3 2519

http://www.chesszone.org

83rd Hastings International Congress (28.12 - 06.01)

Vadim Malahatko, Nidzhat Mamedov & Valerii Neverov tied first place with perfect 7,5

(10).

XXXVII Rilton Cup. Stockholm, Sweden (27.12 - 05.01)

The event with a 9 way tie on 6.5/9. Radoslaw Wojtaszek had the best tie-break.

Sources:
1)

http://www.e3e5.com

2) The Week In Chess

http://www.chesscenter.com/twic/twic.html

3) ChessPro.ru

http://www.chesspro.ru

4) CrestBook.com

http://www.crestbook.com/

http://www.chesszone.org

Games

(01) Gashimov,Vugar (2665) -
Tiviakov,Sergei (2649) [B01]

50th It Reggio Emilia ITA (7), 04.01.2008

[Polivanov, Anatoliy]

1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5 3.Nc3 Qd6 Grand-
master Sergej Tiviakov is a leading expert
for this continuation in Scandinavian de-
fence. 4.d4 Nf6 5.Nf3 c6 [Tiviakov also
uses 5...a6 as often as 5...c6, here's a
quotation: "5... c6 is another move I play
regularly. I played it against Anand, Gris-
chuk. There is nothing wrong with it..." ]
6.Ne5 Nbd7 7.Bf4 Nd5 On top level this
move was introduced in well-known game
Anand-Tiviakov, Wijk aan Zee 2006.
8.Nxd5 Nxe5!?N Novelty at 8th move - this
is rare case in our time! [Against Anand
Dutchman chose 8...Qxd5 and after the
principle objection 9.Be2!? - he took a
pawn: 9...Nxe5 10.Bxe5 Qxg2 11.Bf3 Qg6
. Commenting the game, Viswanathan
recommended 12.Qe2

(

in a game, Anand

overlooked trick:

12.d5 Bg4!³)

, what was

checked in two recent games: 12...h5

(12. Qe6 13 d5 ? cxd5 14.0–0–0 f6

Ivanets-Smirnov, Ilichevsk 2007, and here
was interesting

15.Bxd5 Qxe5 16.Qc4

with attack

)

13.h3! f6!? - we are looking

for duel of two hungarian grandmasters,
Almasi-Varga, HUNchT 2006. After
14.Bh2 the game soon ended with a
draw.] 9.Ne3 [Of course not 9.Nxe7?!
Qxe7 10.dxe5 Qb4+; 9.dxe5 will imply
queen's exchange, what Gashimov, per-
haps, tried to escape. ; And if 9.Bxe5 -
then we will come to Anand-Tiviakov.]
9...Nd3+ 10.Qxd3 Qxf4 11.d5!? Diagram

. !

)

XABCDEFGHY

8r+l+kvl-tr(

7zpp+-zppzpp'

6-+p+-+-+&

5+-+P+-+-%

4-+-+-wq-+$

3+-+QsN-+-#

2PzPP+-zPPzP"

1tR-+-mKL+R!

xabcdefghy

Very boldly![Most would prefer 11.g3 ,
directing a bishop to the main diagonal.
But Gashimov sowed the storm... and
succeeded in doing so!] 11...cxd5?
[There were two reasonable alternative for
Black: principle 11...Qb4+ 12.c3 Qxb2
13.Rb1 (worse 13.Rd1?! Bd7!

(13...c5?

14.Nc4 Qxa2 15.Qe3±)

14.dxc6 Bxc6

15.Nd5 0–0–0!µ) 13...Qxa2

(13...Qa3!?

14.Be2

(14.g3

is leading to approximately

the same

)

14...g6 15.dxc6 bxc6 16.Bf3

Qa4

(

dangerous

16...Qe6

because of

17.Qd4)

, and a draw seems the most

reasonable outcome: 17.Rb4 Qa1+
18.Rb1=; also there is a cold-blooded
11...Bd7 12.0–0–0 e6!ч] 12.Qxd5 e6
13.Bb5+ Now, the black king loses calm
for a long time. 13...Ke7 14.Qd2 Qd6
15.Qe2 White are fine maneuvering the
queen, creating a threat constantly.
15...Kf6 16.Qf3+ Ke7 17.Qe2 Kf6 18.Qf3+
Ke7 Draw? 19.0–0 Nope! 19...Qc5 20.Ba4
Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8r+l+-vl-tr(

7zpp+-mkpzpp'

6-+-+p+-+&

5+-wq-+-+-%

4L+-+-+-+$

3+-+-sNQ+-#

2PzPP+-zPPzP"

1tR-+-+RmK-!

xabcdefghy

http://www.chesszone.org

Perhaps this is a key moment for the
whole game. White probably are going to
put the white rook on e1, so it's desirable
to leave king out of a possible X-
ray.20...g6?! Tiviakov elected a "slow"
path. [More preferable was 20...f5!
21.Rfe1 Kf7 22.Bb3 g6 , and if will come
the impulsive 23.g4?! , then after 23...Rg8
White's king may also be under fire.;
Maybe, 20...f6 even more precisely.]
21.Rfe1 Bg7 22.Rad1! This is the only
continuation to support the fire of attack!
This impedes 22... Rd8 with further
evacuation Ke7-f8-g8. Also, it contributes
to b2-b4 - so, if Black's move is 22...f5,
then 23.b4 unexpectedly wins the queen.
Therefore Tivyakov solved destroy pawn...
22...Bxb2 After the white's reply, black
fields are undefencible. [Perhaps, it
should elect 22...a5!? ] 23.c3! Brilliant!
Now, any taking on c3 is impossible be-
cause of Ne3-d5. 23...f5 24.Rb1! Hunting
for the black bishop! 24...Ba3 25.Rb5 Qc6
26.Qg3! Bd7 Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8r+-+-+-tr(

7zpp+lmk-+p'

6-+q+p+p+&

5+R+-+p+-%

4L+-+-+-+$

3vl-zP-sN-wQ-#

2P+-+-zPPzP"

1+-+-tR-mK-!

xabcdefghy

[Doesn't help 26...Rf8 27.Qh4+] 27.Nxf5+
The decisive blow. 27...Kd8 [Variants like
27...gxf5 28.Qg7+ Kd6 29.Rd1+ Kc7
30.Rxb7+ are very simple for calculation.]
28.Rb4 Qc7 It's impossible to get away for
a queen: [28...Qxa4 29.Rxa4 Bxa4
30.Qe5+-; 28...Bxb4 29.Bxc6 bxc6
30.Nh6+-] 29.Qh4+ Kc8 30.Bxd7+ Kxd7
[30...Qxd7 31.Rc4+] 31.Qe7+ A game of
Gashimov in an interval between 22 and
26 moves impresses very much. Not with-

out reason it gained the brilliancy prize in
this tournament! 1–0

(02) Almasi,Z (2691) - Navara,D
(2656) [C92]

50th It Reggio Emilia ITA (8), 05.01.2008

[Polivanov, Anatoliy]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6
5.0–0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 d6 8.c3 0–0
9.h3 Bb7 [Gambit 9...Na5 10.Bc2 d5!? is
very popular nowadays.] 10.d4 Re8
11.Nbd2 [Sometimes occures "draw
checking" 11.Ng5 Rf8 12.Nf3 Re8 but Al-
masi proceed immediately to the busi-
ness.] 11...Bf8 Further knight's move not
good because of threat to the pawn e4, so
it had to close the center. 12.d5 Nb8
13.Nf1 Nbd7 14.N3h2 Nc5 [14...h6 -
grandmaster Mihail Marin says: "Neces-
sary prophylaxis. Before starting his
counterplay, Black denies the enemy
bishop's access to g5." But 14...Nc5 even
more popular, then 14...h6.] 15.Bc2 c6
Undermining the center. If Black will ac-
complish d6-d5, they will solve all prob-
lems. That's why fight for the point d5 - is
the corner-stone of this variation. 16.b4
Ncd7 17.dxc6 Bxc6 18.Bg5 GM Marin:
"With good chances of obtaining the ab-
solute control of the critical d5-square".
Will see! 18...Qc7 [More common con-
tinuation - 18...h6 . After 19.Bxf6 Nxf6
20.Ng4 Nxg4 21.Qxg4 Black may choose
between 21...d5

(

21...Bd7 22.Q 3 Rc8

23.Bb3 Be6

- it seems, that are not any

problems for Black.

)

] 19.Bxf6 Nxf6

20.Ng4 Be7 [In 90% of cases, Black ex-
changed the khights: 20...Nxg4 21.hxg4
Here is a recent example, Wemmers-
Richter, Haarlem 2007: 21...Bd7 22.Qf3
Rac8 23.Bb3 Be6 24.Rac1 Be7 25.Red1
Bg5 26.Rc2 Red8 - Black face the future
with confidence.] 21.Nxf6+ Bxf6 22.Bb3N
Hardly more than month back, this posi-
tion was on the World Cup in Hanty-
Mansiysk, and white figures was managed
by... Navara! [22.Ne3 Bg5 23.Nf5?! g6
24.Ne3 Rad8 25.Qd3 Bxe3 26.Qxe3 d5=
Navara-Ivanov, World Cup 2007. Indeed,

http://www.chesszone.org

Navara has won those game. Anyway, Al-
masi's move looks more logical, then
22.Ne3.] 22...a5 23.bxa5! [23.a3?! axb4
24.cxb4 creates unnecessary weakness.]
23...Rxa5 24.Qf3 Bd7?! Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8-+-+r+k+(

7+-wql+pzpp'

6-+-zp-vl-+&

5trp+-zp-+-%

4-+-+P+-+$

3+LzP-+Q+P#

2P+-+-zPP+"

1tR-+-tRNmK-!

xabcdefghy

Black must prevent Ne3-d5.[According
to this, 24...Bg5 suggests itself. If 25.Ne3
, then 25...Bxe3 26.Rxe3 g6 with possible
Kg7, Rf8, f7-f5. But Navara decided to go
another way...] 25.Ne3! Be6 [It turns out,
that it's impossible 25...Qxc3 through
26.Qh5! Rf8

(26 ..Be6 27.Bxe6 Rxe6

28.Rac1+-; 26...g6 27.Qf3 Kg7 28.Nf5++-

)

27.Nd5 Qc8 28.Nxf6+ gxf6 29.Re3 with

winning attack.] 26.Nd5 Bxd5 27.Bxd5±
There is a typical situation in which Black
don't have counterplay (pawn с3 easily
defencible), and the White have prospects
of attack on a king-side. 27...Rc8?! The
lost of time - the rook has nothing to do on
"с"-file. [More interesting 27...Qd7 with
idea Bd8-b6, Kh8, Rf8 and f7-f5. In pros-
pect - pressure to pawn f2.] 28.Re3 Qd7!
[It could be tactical trick: 28...b4 29.cxb4
Rxd5 30.exd5 e4 , but 31.Qxe4 indicate
the weakness of last rank. 28...Qd7 tries
to improve that, but Almasi isn't drows-
ing!] 29.Rd1! Bd8 30.Qh5 Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8-+rvl-+k+(

7+-+q+p

(

zpp'

6-+-zp-+-+&

5trp+Lzp-+Q%

4-+-+P+-+$

3+-zP-tR-+P#

2P+-+-zPP+"

1+-+R+-mK-!

xabcdefghy

30...Bb6? Navara missed the tactics, and
unpleasant Black's position is transform-
ing to hopeless very quickly. [Cannot be
recommended 30...g6?! 31.Qh6 Bb6
32.Rf3 Rf8 33.Rdd3! Qe7 34.Rf5 Kh8
35.Rg3 , and Black is helpless; It's worth
to back in a life rook a5: 30...Ra7! 31.Rf3
Qe8 with chances to successfull de-
fence.] 31.Rf3 Rf8 [31...g6 32.Rxf7+-]
32.Bxf7+! Rxf7 [32...Kh8 loses immedi-
ately: 33.Bg6] 33.Rxd6 Qa7 34.Qxf7+
[34.Rxb6? would be a mistake: 34...Rxf3
35.gxf3

(35.Qe8+ Rf8)

35...g6!] 34...Qxf7

35.Rxf7 Kxf7 36.Rxb6 Two pawns up in a
rook ending. The rest is simple. 36...g5
37.g3 h5 38.Kf1 h4 39.Kg2 Sooner or later
pawn moves will be finished. 39...Rxa2
40.Rxb5 Kf6 41.Rb6+ Ke7 42.gxh4 gxh4
43.Rh6 White are destroying the last ob-
stacle on a way to "h" pawn. 43...Rc2
44.Rxh4 Rxc3 45.Rh5 Ke6 46.Rf5 Black
king is cut off from "f"-file, so pawn "h"
just moving forward, to queen ceremony.
46...Rc4 47.f3 Rc2+ 48.Kg3 Rc1 49.h4
Rg1+ 50.Kh2 Rg6 51.Kh3 Rg8 52.h5 Rg1
53.Kh4 Rh1+ 54.Kg5 Rg1+ 55.Kh6 Rg3
56.Kh7 Rg2 57.h6 Rg3 58.Kh8 [Let's
dream up: 58.Kh8 Rg2 59.h7 Rg1 60.Rf8
Rf1 61.Ra8 Rxf3

(61...Rg1 62.Rg8)

62.Kg7 Rg3+ 63.Kf8 Rf3+

63...Rh3

64.Ra6+ Kd7 65.Kg7)

64.Ke8 Rh3

65.Ra6#] 1–0

(03) Berg,Emanuel (2583) -
Szabo,Krisztian (2500) [B96]

Rilton Cup 37 (2007–08) Stockholm (9),
05.01.2008

http://www.chesszone.org

[Polivanov, Anatoliy]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6
5.Nc3 a6 6.Bg5 e6 7.f4 Nbd7 [It's neces-
sary to take into account 7...Qb6 , but this
subject deserves a separate talk.] 8.Qf3
Qc7 9.0–0–0 b5 10.Bd3 Bb7 11.Rhe1 Qb6
12.Nb3 Very interesting moment! [Almost
a year ago, playing with Negi, Berg pre-
ferred decisive 12.Nd5!? After forced
12...Qxd4

12...exd5

is bad because of

13.Nc6!

- known since the game Chibur-

danidze-Dvoirys, Tallinn 1980

)

13.Bxf6

gxf6 14.Bxb5 Qc5 15.Nxf6+ Kd8 16.Nxd7
Qxb5 17.Nxf8 Rxf8 18.Qa3 Ke8! 19.Qxd6
Qc6! Berg got even a little bit worse posi-
tion. Making casual mention of 12.Nb3,
swedish grandmaster wrote: "... with a
rather equal position". '=' is better than
'=/+', isn't it?] 12...b4 13.Nb1 Occured
another jumps: 13.Na4 and 13.Ne2, but
13.Nb1 looks most appropriate. Besides,
this move was performed in semifinal of
World Cup in Hanty-Mansiysk, in a game
Shirov-Karjakin - that fact defines "open-
ing fashion", in some sense. 13...Qc7
14.N1d2 Be7 15.Qh3 Diagram

(

XABCDEFGHY

8r+-+k+-tr(

7+lwqnvlpzpp'

6p+-zppsn-+&

5+-+-+-vL-%

4-zp-+PzP-+$

3+N+L+-+Q#

2PzPPsN-+PzP"

1+-mKRtR-+-!

xabcdefghy

15...Rc8!N On my opinion, this is strong
novelty. [Of course, not 15...0–0 16.e5!;
Above-mentioned game was proceeding
by the following way: 15...e5 16.Nc4 0–0
17.Nba5 Bc8 18.Qg3 - a bishop on c8 is
very passive, so 15...Rc8 frees for it the
square а8, where it aims at the pawn e4. ;
Transforming this idea by 15...e5 16.Nc4
Rc8 isn't good through 17.Nba5 Ba8
18.fxe5 dxe5 19.Bxf6 Nxf6

(19 ..Bxf6

20.Be2)

20.Nxe5 0–0 21.Nac4±] 16.Kb1

[If now 16.Nc4 , then is necessary to con-
sider with 16...Bxe4 - consequences are
uncertain in this case. Therefore White did
a waiting prophylactic move.] 16...e5
17.Nc4 0–0 Castle, finally. [Here
17...Bxe4 is not effective, because e6-e5
is played already: 18.Bxe4 Qxc4 19.Bf5]
18.Ne3 Rfe8 19.Nf5 Bf8 Both sides have
complete their development. Black have a
clear plan a5-a4-a3... , and what may op-
pose White to this? Ghost of attack on a
king side? 20.fxe5 Before to translate a
rook for an attack, the white want to
weaken pressure on the pawn of е4.
20...dxe5 21.Re3 Re6 22.Rf1 Not very
much vigorous continuation of attack, but
what another can be offered? [Draw like
there is still: 22.Qh4 a5 23.Rg3 a4
24.Nh6+ Kh8 25.Nxf7+ Kg8 26.Nh6+ , but
does anyone need it?] 22...a5 Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8-+r+-vlk+(

7+lwqn+pzpp'

6-+-+rsn-+&

5zp-+-zpNvL-%

4-zp-+P+-+$

3+N+LtR-+Q#

2PzPP+-+PzP"

1+K+-+R+-!

xabcdefghy

23.Rg3 Perhaps, Berg spent here a lot of
time - therefore he decides to to stake
one's all. It's difficult to blame such deci-
sion... [23.Nd2 Nc5] 23...Nxe4 24.Be7
[24.Nh6+ gives nothing: 24...Rxh6
25.Bxh6 Nxg3 26.Qxg3 a4 27.Nd2 a3–+]
24...Nxg3 25.Bd8!? Very creative! [Maybe
Berg was planning 25.Nxg7 , but 25...Rg6
parries all threats. ] 25...e4 [25...Qxd8??
26.Ne7++-] 26.Bxc7 Nxf1 27.Bxf1 Rxc7
Let's summarize - Black have almost won
position. 28.Qg3 Rc8 29.Bb5 Nb6 30.Nxa5
Ba8 31.Nb3 31...Rc5 was threatening.
31...Rd8 [This motion is quite good, but,
possibly, more practical there was 31...g6

http://www.chesszone.org

32.Nfd4 Bd6! , driving back white figures.
] 32.a4!? If to judge objectively, this move
is not the best, but in this position - is the
best chance! Now a situation is tangled to
the limit. 32...bxa3 33.Nbd4 Rg6 34.Qc7
Rc8 35.Ne7+ Bxe7 36.Qxe7 axb2
[36...Rxg2 was simpler: 37.bxa3

(37.Qxa3

Rg1+ 38.Ka2 Bd5+)

37...Nd5–+] 37.Nf5

Nd5! [37...Rxg2?! 38.Qe5! Nd5 39.Bc4!
with some draw chances.] 38.Qd7 Rb8
39.c4 Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8ltr-+-+k+(

7+-+Q+pzpp'

6-+-+-+r+&

5+L+n+N+-%

4-+P+p+-+$

3+-+-+-+-#

2-zp-+-+PzP"

1+K+-+-+-!

xabcdefghy

39...Rgb6? Time trouble? [39...Bc6 won
quite easily: 40.Qa7 Ra8 41.Qd4

(41.Q 2

Nc3+ 42.Kxb2 Nd1+–+)

41...Rxg2–+]

40.Nd6! Nc3+ [What about 40...Bc6!?
41.Qxf7+ Kh8 42.Qe6

(42.cxd5? Bxb5–+)

42...h6 43.Kxb2 Nc7 44.Qe7 Nxb5
45.cxb5 Bxb5µ] 41.Kxb2 Nxb5 42.cxb5
[Not 42.Qxf7+ Kh8 43.Nxb5 Bc6µ]
42...Bd5 [42...Bc6 43.Qxf7+ Kh8 44.Qe6
Bxb5?? 45.Nf7+; 42...e3 would give just a
draw. 43.Kc3 Rxd6 44.Qxd6 Re8 45.Qd7
Kf8 46.Qd6+ Kg8 47.Qd7=] 43.Kc3 Be6
44.Qe7 h6 [44...e3!? 45.Kd3 e2 46.Kxe2
Bc4+ 47.Ke3 Bxb5 48.Qxf7+ Kh8³]
45.Kd4 Rxd6+ Simplifying annihilation.
[45...e3!? was the last chance: 46.Kxe3
Bc4 47.Kd4 Bxb5 48.Qxf7+ Kh8 49.Ke5!=

(49.Nf5 R6b7 50.Ne7? Rd8+ 51.Kc5

Rc8+! 52.Kd6 Rd7+ 53.Ke6 Rxe7+–+)

]

46.Qxd6 Rxb5 47.Kxe4 h5 48.g3 Rf5
49.Ke3 Long-suffering game... ½–½

(

(04) Shirov,Alexei (2755) -
Inarkiev,Ernesto (2681) [C95]

2nd ACP World Rapid Cup Odessa (1.1),

04.01.2008

[Polivanov, Anatoliy]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 a6 4.Ba4 Nf6
5.0–0 Be7 6.Re1 b5 7.Bb3 0–0 8.c3 d6
[Recenlty Shirov won two games (with
Jakovenko and Karjakin), fighting versus
8...d5 - the Marshall attack. That's why
the chance to see against him 8...d6 (but
not 8...d5) - is big enough in the near fu-
ture.] 9.h3 Nb8 Breyer system still re-
mains one of the most popular. 10.d4
Nbd7 11.Nbd2 Bb7 12.Bc2 Re8 13.Nf1
Bf8 14.Ng3 g6 15.b3 [Another continua-
tion - 15.a4 c5 16.d5 c4!? , providing a
square c5 for a black knight. Therefore,
White's move 15.b3 is meant for meeting
c5-c4 by b3-b4...] 15...Bg7 Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8r+-wqr+k+(

7+lzpn+pvlp'

6p+-zp-snp+&

5+p+-zp-+-%

4-+-zPP+-+$

3+PzP-+NsNP#

2P+L+-zPP+"

1tR-vLQtR-mK-!

xabcdefghy

16.a4?! ... but now Black have a retort.
[Probably, if White want to fight for an
opening advantage, they need to close
the center: 16.d5 with further c3-c4.]
16...d5! "Answer to a flank attack by blow
to the center" - a classics! 17.axb5 [All
this already was in a game Byrne-
Spassky, match(3) 1974. American
played 17.dxe5 Nxe4 18.Bxe4

(18.Nxe4

dxe4 19.Bxe4 Bxe4 20 Rxe4 Nxe5=)

18...dxe4 19.Bg5 , and here Boris Va-
silievich sacrificed a queen: 19...exf3!?

19...Qc8

was more reliable

)

20.Bxd8

Raxd8©] 17...Nxe4!N Very good! Evalua-
tion of the position is still fluctuates
around equality, but now White at the
crossroads - and this increases the error
probability. [17...axb5 18.Rxa8 Qxa8

(18...Bxa8 19.dxe5 Nxe4 20.Nxe4 dxe4

http://www.chesszone.org

21.Bg5!)

19.dxe5 Nxe4

19...Nxe5

20 Nxe5 Rxe5 21. 4ƒ)

20.Nxe4 dxe4

21.Bxe4 Bxe4 22.Qxd7 Bxf3 23.gxf3
Rxe5=] 18.bxa6 Of course, Shirov elects
uncompromising continuation! [After
18.Nxe4 dxe4 19.Bxe4 Bxe4 20.Rxe4
axb5 Black has nothing to complain
about.] 18...Nxc3 19.Qd3 Ne4 20.Bb2
Protecting the rook. 20...Nxg3 21.axb7
Rxa1 22.Rxa1 e4 Diagram

(

XABCDEFGHY

8-+-wqr+k+(

7+Pzpn+pvlp'

6-+-+-+p+&

5+-+p+-+-%

4-+-zPp+-+$

3+P+Q+NsnP#

2-vLL+-zPP+"

1tR-+-+-mK-!

xabcdefghy

23.Qb5? A mistake. Anyway, we must not
forget that it's rapid chess - and mistakes
are their essential part. [After only move
23.Qd1 would follow: 23...exf3 24.fxg3
c6! 25.Qxf3 Qb6 with a more comfortable
play to Black.] 23...c6! That's it! A queen
is distracted from the diagonal a6-f1. The
knight g3 will jump to e2, and White will
remain without a minor piece. 24.Qxc6
[24.Qa6 Nb8] 24...Ne2+ 25.Kh1 Nb8–+
26.Qc8 exf3 27.Qxd8 fxg2+ [27...Rxd8
would more exactly: 28.Ra4 Rd7] 28.Kxg2
Rxd8 29.Ra8 [¹29.Ra4 - there was no
need for losing pawn d4. But position is
lost in any case.] 29...Nxd4 30.Ba3 Bf8
[30...Nxc2? 31.Bd6!] 31.Bxf8 Kxf8 32.Bd1
Ke7 0–1

(05) Savchenko,Boris (2589) -
Jakovenko,Dmitrij (2720) [C44]

2nd ACP World Rapid Cup Odessa (1.1),
04.01.2008

[Polivanov, Anatoliy]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.c3 Ponziani Opening
- a rare guest in tournaments nowadays.
3...d5 4.Qa4 Nf6!? We can say safely, that

Jakovenko knows classics very well - be-
cause 4...Nf6 was played several times by
Alexander Alekhine! [Usually happens
4...Bd7 5.exd5 Nd4 6.Qd1 Nxf3+ 7.Qxf3
Nf6©] 5.Nxe5 Bd6 6.exd5 0–0 [6...Bxe5
7.dxc6 0–0 8.d4 Bd6 leads to the same.]
7.dxc6 Bxe5 8.d4 Bd6 9.Be3 The king on
e1 seems so naked, that it's without fail to
put any piece on the rank "e". [Here is an
example of 4th World Champion's creativ-
ity: 9.Be2 Re8 10.Bg5 bxc6 11.Nd2 Qe7
12.Qc4 a5 13.Qd3 Bf5 14.Qf3 Qd7 15.h3
Ne4 16.Be3 Nxd2 17.Kxd2 Rab8 18.b3
c5! , and the game Rabinovich-Alekhine,
Moscow 1915 soon was over.] 9...Ng4
10.Nd2 Nxe3 11.fxe3 Qh4+ 12.Kd1 bxc6N
[A battle of two german amateurs passed
so: 12...Qf2 13.Nc4? Bg4+ 14.Kc1 Qe1+
0–1. But Savchenko, without a doubt,
would have improved White's game.]
13.Bd3 c5 Good move. Black are deliv-
ered from a weak pawn, destroyed king's
shelter and directed bishop c8 to diagonal
a8-h1. 14.Kc2 Bb7 15.g3 Qh6 16.e4 cxd4
17.cxd4 Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8r+-+-trk+(

7zplzp-+pzpp'

6-+-vl-+-wq&

5+-+-+-+-%

4Q+-zPP+-+$

3+-+L+-zP-#

2PzPKsN-+-zP"

1tR-+-+-+R!

xabcdefghy

17...c5? Now White will get a pawn pair in
a center, and comfortable stand on с4 for
a knight. [It's desirable to go 17...Kh8!?
but then can appear unpleasant 18.Ba6;
That's why we must think about prophy-
laxis and play 17...a5! ] 18.d5 Be5 19.Nf3
Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8r+-+-trk+(

7zpl+-+pzpp'

http://www.chesszone.org

6-+-+-+-wq&

5+-zpPvl-+-%

4Q+-+P+-+$

3+-+L+NzP-#

2PzPK+-+-zP"

1tR-+-+-+R!

xabcdefghy

[Not bad, but 19.Nc4!? looks more
strengthening.] 19...Bxb2!? Feeling that
events begin to accept an unfavourable
turn, Jakovenko decides on a sharp
change position. 20.Rab1 [20.Kxb2 Qf6+]
20...Qe3 21.Rxb2? [21.Nd2! declared
white superiority: 21...c4™ 22.Nxc4 Qf2+
23.Nd2 Rac8+ 24.Bc4±] 21...c4! [White's
calculation, obviously, was built on
21...Qxf3? 22.Rf1 Qg2+ 23.Kb1+-]
22.Ne5? Errors don't walk alone...
[¹22.Bxc4 Qxe4+ 23.Kc1 Bxd5! 24.Qc2
Qxf3 25.Bxd5 Qxd5 26.Rd1 with further
Kb1 - Black's victory is still far.]
22...cxd3+ 23.Kb1 Bxd5 24.exd5 Qxe5
Two extra pawns, dangerous passer... all
this clearly presages a fast win. 25.Qc4
Rab8 26.Rb3 Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8-tr-+-trk+(

7zp-+-+pzpp'

6-+-+-+-+&

5+-+Pwq-+-%

4-+Q+-+-+$

3+R+p+-zP-#

2P+-+-+-zP"

1+K+-+-+R!

xabcdefghy

26...a5! Very inventive! 27.d6 [27.Qxd3 a4
28.Rxb8 Rxb8+ 29.Kc2 Qb2+ 30.Kd1
Qa1+–+; 27.Rd1 a4 28.Qxa4 Qe2–+]
27...Qxd6 [27...a4 28.Qxa4 d2 would
complete a game.] 28.Rd1 Rxb3+ 29.axb3
Rd8 30.Qb5 Qe6! The advantage of two
extra pawns consists of that it's possible
to sacrifice one of them for a winning
pawn endgame. 31.Rxd3 Qe4 32.Kc2 f5!

Hurry nowhere ... At least one more move.
33.Kd2 Qxd3+ 34.Qxd3 Rxd3+ 35.Kxd3
Kf7 36.Kd4 Ke6 37.Kc5 g5 38.Kd4
[38.Kb5 Kd5 39.Kxa5 f4–+] 38...h6 39.h4
gxh4 40.gxh4 Here a game is
over.[40.gxh4 h5 41.Ke3 Ke5 42.Kf3 f4
43.Kf2 Ke4 44.Ke2 f3+ 45.Kf2 Kf4–+] 0–1

(06) Pert,N (2539) - Williams,Simon
Kim (2475) [A43]

Premier Hastings ENG (9), 05.01.2008

[Kryakvin Dmitry]

Black were playing rather lightmind-
edly.This style had often brought them
luck.But not this time. 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 c5
3.d5 b5 A rare sistem. One of the favorite
openings of the great Paul Keres 4.Bg5
The only way to get advantage in this line.
4...Qb6 5.a4 [More principled 5.Bxf6
gives White serious initiative 5...Qxf6 6.c3
Qb6 7.e4 g6 8.Nbd2 Bg7 9.a4 b4 10.Nc4
Qb7!? Mchedlishvili-Zhang,1999.]
5...bxa4? [5...b4! 6.a5

(6.e3 g6 7.d6 Bg7

8.dxe7 Qe6

Maksimovic-Bareev,1987

)

6...Qc7 7.c4 d6 8.Nbd2 g6 9.e4 Bg7
Seems more playable Vyzmanavin-
Kiselev,1985] 6.Nc3! Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8rsnl+kvl-tr(

7zp-+pzppzpp'

6-wq-+-sn-+&

5+-zpP+-vL-%

4p+-+-+-+$

3+-sN-+N+-#

2-zPP+PzPPzP"

1tR-+QmKL+R!

xabcdefghy

It is scary to part with a pawn b2, having
his queenside weekend, but in this case
Pert shows concerte approach to posi-
tion. 6...Qxb2 7.Bd2 Qb6 8.e4 d6 9.e5!
dxe5 10.Nxe5 Strong knight gives White
extrainitiative 10...e6? [More common
10...g6 but... 11.Rb1 Qc7 12.Bb5+ Bd7
13.Bf4 Qc8 14.d6! Bg7 15.dxe7 a6
16.Nc4! axb5 17.Nd6+ Diagram

http://www.chesszone.org

XABCDEFGHY

8rsnq+k+-tr(

7+-+lzPpvlp'

6-+-sN-snp+&

5+pzp-+-+-%

4p+-+-vL-+$

3+-sN-+-+-#

2-+P+-zPPzP"

1+R+QmK-+R!

xabcdefghy

and Black collapses, Vyzmanavin-

Arbakov,1986; One could recommend the
following 10...a6!? 11.Qf3 Nbd7] 11.Qf3!
Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8rsnl+kvl-tr(

7zp-+-+pzpp'

6-wq-+psn-+&

5+-zpPsN-+-%

4p+-+-+-+$

3+-sN-+Q+-#

2-+PvL-zPPzP"

1tR-+-mKL+R!

xabcdefghy

11...Qc7 Black continued to resist only
because it was incovenient to resing so
early! [11...a6 12.dxe6 Qxe6 13.0–0–0+-;
11...Nbd7 12.dxe6 Qxe6 13.Qxa8 Qxe5+
14.Be2+-] 12.Bb5+ Kd8 [12...Nbd7 is also
replied by 13.d6+-] 13.Nc4 Pert arranges
his pieces for decisive battle with predict-
able outcome. 13...Bd6 14.Bg5 Rf8 15.0–
0–0 Bb7 16.Ne4+- Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8rsn-mk-tr-+(

7zplwq-+pzpp'

6-+-vlpsn-+&

5+LzpP+-vL-%

4p+N+N+-+$

3+-+-+Q+-#

2-+P+-zPPzP"

1+-mKR+-+R!

xabcdefghy

Terrible for Black. 16...Bxd5 17.Ncxd6
Qxd6 18.Rxd5 Qxd5 19.Rd1 Kc7 It looks
like Black is more impatient to see this
game ending... 20.Rxd5 Nxd5 21.Qg3+
Kb7 22.Qd6 1–0

(07) Akesson,Ralf (2470) -
Nyysti,Sampsa (2363) [A64]

Rilton Cup 37 (2007–08) Stockholm (9),
05.01.2008

[Kryakvin Dmitry]

Of cource, it is not easy to play in such un-
trammeled manner. Moreover, such un-
trammeled manner may not differ from
the requirements of the position. To be
sure, a challenge to fortune is always a big
risk. But that is a real man's approach!
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.g3 c5 For over 5 years
now this has been a standart position in
the games of Nyysti 4.d5 exd5 5.cxd5 d6
6.Nc3 g6 Sharp Benoni Indian. Now the
line is intensively developed 7.Bg2 Bg7
8.Nf3 0–0 9.0–0 Re8 10.h3 a6 11.a4 Nbd7
12.Nd2 Rb8 13.Nc4 Nb6 [Do you remem-
ber one of the best games in the line?
13...Ne5 14.Na3 Nh5 15.e4 Rf8 16.Kh2 f5
17.f4 b5!! Diagram

http://www.chesszone.org

XABCDEFGHY

8-trlwq-trk+(

7+-+-+-vlp'

6p+-zp-+p+&

5+pzpPsnp+n%

4P+-+PzP-+$

3sN-sN-+-zPP#

2-zP-+-+LmK"

1tR-vLQ+R+-!

xabcdefghy

A bolt from the blue! 18.axb5 axb5
19.Naxb5 fxe4 20.Bxe4 Bd7 21.Qe2 Qb6
22.Na3 Rbe8 23.Bd2 Qxb2 24.fxe5 Bxe5
25.Nc4 Nxg3 26.Rxf8+ Rxf8 27.Qe1
Nxe4+ 28.Kg2 Qc2 29.Nxe5 Rf2+–+
Korchnoi-Kasparov,1982] 14.Na3 Why
should white lose a tempo here and ride
his knight to the board border? The fact of
the matter is that black has less space
and need some exchanges to breathe and
white should keep as many pieces as he
can to prevent this. Another idea of 14.
Na3 move is a4-a5 advance and black will
be forced to resign a battle about c4
point. 14...Bd7 15.Bf4 Qc7 [Another op-
tion is 15...Nh5!? 16.Bxd6 Bxc3 17.Bxb8

(17.bxc3? Bxa4)

17...Bxb2 18.Ba7!! Dia-

gram

XABCDEFGHY

8-+-wqr+k+(

7vLp+l+p+p'

6psn-+-+p+&

5+-zpP+-+n%

4P+-+-+-+$

3sN-+-+-zPP#

2-vl-+PzPL+"

1tR-+Q+RmK-!

xabcdefghy

18...Bxa1 19.Bxb6 Qxb6 20.Qxa1 with
unclear position] 16.b3?! An innacu-
racy.To fight for supremacy,White should
have played [16.a5 Nc8 17.Nc4 Bb5
18.Qb3!] 16...Nh5 Natural move.White
pieces in danger! 17.Bd2 Nc8 Only b7-b5

is principal move for black in Benoni!
18.g4!? A risky decision! [18.Qb1 b5
19.axb5 axb5 20.b4!] 18...Nf4?! [Simply
and strong is 18...Nf6µ with idea h7-h5]
19.Bxf4 Bxc3 20.Rc1!! Great! Exchanging
bishop is deadly for Black! 20...Bb2
21.Rc2! Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8-trn+r+k+(

7+pwql+p+p'

6p+-zp-+p+&

5+-zpP+-+-%

4P+-+-vLP+$

3sNP+-+-+P#

2-vlR+PzPL+"

1+-+Q+RmK-!

xabcdefghy

21...Bg7 [21...Bxa3? 22.Qa1!± Bb4!
23.Bh6 f6

(23...Re5 24.f4+-)

24.Qxf6

Bxa4 25.bxa4 Qe7 26.Qxe7 Rxe7 27.Ra1
b5 28.axb5 axb5 29.Bf4±] 22.Qd2 The
critical position. It is not easy for White to
coordinate the actions of his pieces;Black
in other hand, has a definite plan of op-
erations on the Q-side. 22...b5 23.b4 c4 A
shortcoming of the Ekesson system is the
fact that it's difficult to bring the knight a3
into the play and opponent has a superi-
ority in the centre. 24.a5 f5 25.g5 Re4!! A
risky decision, to be sure, but the strong
position of the pieces prevents Black from
troubles! 26.Nb1! [White cannot play
26.Bxe4 fxe4 27.Qe3 Ne7 28.Qxe4

(28.Kh2 Nxd5)

28...Bxh3 29.Rd1 Bf5]

26...Ne7 27.e3! Catching a rook! 27...Re8
28.Nc3 Nc8 29.Bxe4 [Important moment.
Bad for White is 29.Nxe4 fxe4 30.f3 exf3
31.Rxf3 Bf5] 29...fxe4 30.Kh2 Re5?! Dia-
gram

http://www.chesszone.org

XABCDEFGHY

8-+n+-+k+(

7+-wql+-vlp'

6p+-zp-+p+&

5zPp+Ptr-zP-%

4-zPp+pvL-+$

3+-sN-zP-+P#

2-+RwQ-zP-mK"

1+-+-+R+-!

xabcdefghy

New sacrifice!! [Simply 30...Bf5 After
31.Kg2 Qd7 32.Rh1 Ne7©] 31.Kg2?!
[31.Bxe5! Bxe5+ 32.f4! very unpleasant
suprise! 32...exf3+ 33.Kg1 Bxh3

(33...Bf5

34.Rxf3)

34.Rxf3 Qd7 35.Qf2! White stays

better] 31...Bf5 32.Ne2 Qd7 33.Rh1 Qf7
34.Bxe5 Bxe5 Leaves Black with an ad-
vantage in all continuations. A defence is
not easy, but it's not so easy to crush
White with a direct attack. 35.Rcc1 Ne7
36.Rcd1 Bc8! Excelent! Pair of bishops
with pawn falange gains good chance for
winning 37.Ng1? Mistake.Only move
[37.Nf4! Bb7 38.Qe2! Bxf4 39.exf4 Nxd5
40.Rxd5!] 37...c3 38.Qc2 Qf5! 39.h4 Bb7
Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8-+-+-+k+(

7+l+-sn-+p'

6p+-zp-+p+&

5zPp+PvlqzP-%

4-zP-+p+-zP$

3+-zp-zP-+-#

2-+Q+-zPK+"

1+-+R+-sNR!

xabcdefghy

By maneuvering in his own camp,Nyysti
has archieved positional advanteges and
now activate his quuen.It is difficult for
Ekesson to protect all the points that are
weak.... 40.Kf1 Bxd5 41.f4? White turns to
tactical play,which only hastens the inevi-
table 41...exf3! 42.Qxf5 Nxf5 43.Rxd5
Nxe3+ [Other way 43...c2!! Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8-+-+-+k+(

7+-+-+-+p'

6p+-zp-+p+&

5zPp+RvlnzP-%

4-zP-+-+-zP$

3+-+-zPp+-#

2-+p+-+-+"

1+-+-+KsNR!

xabcdefghy

44.Ne2 Ng3+ 45.Kf2 fxe2 46.Rc1 Bc3
47.Kxg3 e1Q+ 48.Rxe1 Bxe1+] 44.Kf2
Nxd5 45.Nxf3 Bf4 The concluding moves
of the game deserve the traditional chess
annotators cliche" there still followed"...
46.Nd4 Be3+ 47.Kf3 Bxd4 48.Ke4 Be3 0–1

(08) Jones,G (2567) - Pert,N (2539)
[C03]

Premier Hastings ENG (10), 06.01.2008

[Kryakvin Dmitry]

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Be7 4.Ngf3 Nf6
5.e5 Nfd7 6.Bd3 c5 7.0–0 Seldom move
[Chess fashions are fickle even at the GM
level.A mere couple of years ago White
played 7.c3 Nc6 8.0–0 g5!? Such line is
not to Jones's taste] 7...cxd4 8.Nb3 Nc6
9.Re1 Nc5 Novelty. [Alternative line is
9...Qb6 10.Bf4 Nc5 11.Nbxd4 Nxd4
12.Nxd4 Nxd3 13.Qxd3 Bd7 14.c3=]
10.Nxc5 A novel atack idea.A move on re-
cord in this position is [10.Nbxd4 Qb6
11.Bf4 Nxd4 12.Nxd4] 10...Bxc5 11.Ng5
Bb4!? [11...h6? 12.Qh5 Qd7 13.Nxf7! 0–0
14.Ng5!; 11...g6?! 12.Qg4 Be7 13.h4‚]
12.Qf3?! This move Black can followed
[Interesting 12.Bd2 Bxd2 13.Qxd2©]
12...Qe7?! [This time Pert overlooks
12...f5! 13.exf6 Qxf6µ] 13.Re2 h6
14.Nh7!! Diagram

http://www.chesszone.org

XABCDEFGHY

8r+l+k+-tr(

7zpp+-wqpzpN'

6-+n+p+-zp&

5+-+pzP-+-%

4-vl-zp-+-+$

3+-+L+Q+-#

2PzPP+RzPPzP"

1tR-vL-+-mK-!

xabcdefghy

Only forward!! 14...Qh4 15.Bf4 Bf8! Prin-
cipal move.Only draw in variation
[15...Bd7 16.Bg3 Qe7 17.Qg4 Rxh7
18.Bxh7 g6 Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8r+-+k+-+(

7zpp+lwqp+L'

6-+n+p+pzp&

5+-+pzP-+-%

4-vl-zp-+Q+$

3+-+-+-vL-#

2PzPP+RzPPzP"

1tR-+-+-mK-!

xabcdefghy

19.a3! Ba5 20.Bh4 Qf8 21.Bf6 Bd8 22.Qf4
Bxf6 23.Qxf6 Qe7 24.Qh8+ Qf8 25.Qf6=]
16.Bg3 Qe7 17.Qg4 Nb4? [Black should
have played 17...Bd7! 18.Bh4 g5 19.Nf6+
Kd8 20.Bg3 Bg7 21.Nh5 Rg8 with the idea
Rc8,Kd8-c7-b8!] 18.Bb5+? [It would have
been better po play simply 18.Nxf8! Kxf8
19.Qxd4±] 18...Bd7 19.Nf6+? New over-
look [19.Bxd7+! Qxd7 20.Nxf8 Kxf8
21.Qxd4 Qb5 22.Qd1 Rc8 23.c3 Nc6
24.f3=] 19...gxf6 20.exf6 Qxf6? [A "must"
20...h5!! Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8r+-+kvl-tr(

7zpp+lwqp+-'

6-+-+pzP-+&

5+L+p+-+p%

4-sn-zp-+Q+$

3+-+-+-vL-#

2PzPP+RzPPzP"

1tR-+-+-mK-!

xabcdefghy

21.fxe7

(21.Qh3 Qxf6 22.Be5 Qh6µ)

21...hxg4 22.exf8Q+ Rxf8µ; the inferior
line was 20...Qc5?? 21.Rxe6+! Kd8
22.Bxd7] 21.Be5 This leads to forced play
21...Qg5 22.Bxd7+ Kxd7 23.Qxg5 hxg5
24.Bxh8 The rook is not stronger then
knight in such position. There is no
opened files on board! 24...Rc8 25.c3
dxc3 26.Bxc3 Diagram

XABCDEFGHY

8-+r+-vl-+(

7zpp+k+p+-'

6-+-+p+-+&

5+-+p+-zp-%

4-sn-+-+-+$

3+-vL-+-+-#

2PzP-+RzPPzP"

1tR-+-+-mK-!

xabcdefghy

26...Nc6 [26...Rc4! with view to "c" file or
the fourth rank] 27.Rd1 Bc5 28.g3! Black
pawn is centre advance like a steamrol-
ler!White must blocked them 28...b5
29.Kg2 d4 30.f4! The situation becomes
unclear.Black is only slightly worse off
30...gxf4 31.gxf4 f6 32.Be1! Kd6 33.Bh4
Rf8 34.Rde1 Nd8 The last critical position
[34...Kd5 Diagram

http://www.chesszone.org

XABCDEFGHY

8-+-+-tr-+(

7zp-+-+-+-'

6-+n+pzp-+&

5+pvlk+-+-%

4-+-zp-zP-vL$

3+-+-+-+-#

2PzP-+R+KzP"

1+-+-tR-+-!

xabcdefghy

The last chance 35.Rxe6! Bb4! 36.Rxc6!

(36.R1e2 d3–+)

36...Bxe1 37.Rxf6 Rxf6

38.Bxf6 Ke4 39.Bg5! d3 40.Kf1= Bd2
41.Kf2 Be3+ 42.Ke1 Kf3 43.h4 Kg4
44.Kd1 Kh5 45.Ke1 Kg4 draw] 35.Bg3
The game ended as follows 35...Kd5
36.h4 Bd6 37.h5 Rh8 38.Bh4 Be7 39.Rh1
Rxh5 After 40.Bf6! Rh1 41.Be7 Rh8 Jones
almost suffered a death blow in bishop
vs.knight ending 42.Re5! Kc4 43.b3 Kc3
44.Kf3! d3 45.Rc5! Kd2 46.Rc7 Kd1
47.Rd7 d2 48.Bd8 Rc2 49.Rc7= ½–½

(09) Navarra,D (2656) - Godena,M
(2535) [D45]

50th It Reggio Emilia ITA (9), 06.01.2008

[Khusnutdinov,Rustam]

1.c4 e6 2.Nc3 d5 3.d4 c6 4.Qd3 This is
rare enough move on Top GM level. But in
this game it is just an transposition.
4...Nf6 5.Nf3 And we came to the famous
position, that were on the board many
times befor. In our days this is not the
most popular line, but in different times
that position were played by R.Vaganian,
O. Romanishin, Bu Xiangzhi, A.Grischuk.
In Navarra's games this variation happens
not for the first time, so we can say that he
is the one of the main expert nowa-
days.The idea of such early development
of the Queen is to defend c4-pawn and
take control over important square
"e4".But it has also some defects - Queen
often goes by strikes of black pieces
5...Nbd7 One of the main lines. [Also was
5...dxc4 6.Qxc4 and again, with transpo-
sition of the moves we came to the fa-

mous position of a Queen Gambit, that
can be happened from many diffident
variants 6...b5 7.Qd3

7.Qb3 Nbd7 8.Bg5)

7...Bb7 (7...Nbd7 8.e4

(8.g3 Bb7 9.Bg2

a6 10.Bg5 c5=)

8...a6 9.e5 Nd5 10.Nxd5

cxd5 11.Be2 Be7 12.0–0 0–0 13.Bf4 a5
14.Bd1 Ba6 15.Bc2 g6 16.Rfc1 b4 17.Qe3
Re8 18.Bg5 f6 19.exf6 Bxf6 20.h4 Qe7
21.Ba4 Bxg5 22.hxg5 Red8 23.Bxd7 Rxd7
24.Ne5 Rd6 25.Rc5 a4 26.Rac1 Qf8
27.Rc7 Re8 28.Ng4 Re7 29.Qe5 1–0
Grischuk,A (2726)-Papin,V
(2415)/Moscow RUS 2007/The Week in
Chess 668) 8.a3 a6 9.e3 c5 10.dxc5 Bxc5
11.Qxd8+ Kxd8= Karpov,A (2775) - Kas-
parov,G (2785)/Las-Palmas 1996; 5...Be7
6.e4N (6.g3 dxc4

(6 ..b6 7.b3 Ba6 8.a4

Nbd7 9.Bg2 0–0 10.0–0 Rc8 11.Rd1 Bb4

12.Bb2 Qe7=

0–1 Romanishin,O (2570)-

Qi Jingxuan (2440)/Taxco 1985/IZT (35)

)

7.Qxc4 b5 8.Qb3 Bb7 9.Bg2 a6 10.0–0 c5
11.dxc5 Nbd7 12.Be3 Nxc5 13.Bxc5 Bxc5
14.Nxb5 Bd5 15.Qc2 Bxf2+ 16.Rxf2 axb5
17.Qc5 1–0 Vaganian,R (2570)-
Lechtynsky,J (2415)/Tallinn 1979/MCD
(35)) 6...dxc4 7.Qxc4 b5 8.Qd3 b4 9.Na4
0–0 10.Qc2 Qa5 11.b3 Ba6 12.Bxa6 Qxa6
13.Bg5 Nbd7 14.Ne5 Nxe5 15.dxe5 Nd5
16.exd5 Bxg5 17.h4 Bh6 18.g4 Qb5 19.g5
Qxd5 20.0–0 Qf3 21.Qc4 f5 22.Rae1 f4
23.Qxe6+ Kh8 24.Kh2 Qh5 25.gxh6 Rf5
26.hxg7+ Kxg7 27.Rg1+ Kh8 28.Qe7 Rf7
29.Qg5 Qf3 30.e6 Qxf2+ 31.Rg2 1–0
Navara,D (2720)-Korneev,O (2565)/
Montpellier FRA 2007/The Week in Chess
656; 5...b6 6.e4 dxc4 7.Qxc4 Ba6 8.Qb3
Bxf1 9.Kxf1 Be7 10.g3 Nbd7 11.Kg2 0–0
12.Re1 Re8= Alburt,L-Sveshnikov,E/URS/
1977/ Inf 25/606/] 6.e4 David's proprie-
tary move. [Other way is 6.g3 this move is
proprietary for other classic of this varia-
tion, Ukrainian GM Oleg Romanishin.
6...dxc4

(6...b6 7.Bg2 Bb7 8.0–0 Be7

9.Rd1 0–0 10.B 4²

1–0 Grischuk,A

(2726)-Malakhov,V (2676)/Moscow RUS
2007/The Week in Chess 668 (34)

;

6...Bd6 7.Bg2 0–0 8.0–0 dxc4 9.Qxc4 e5

10.Rd1 Qe7 11.Bg5 h6 12.Bxf6 Nxf6

13.dxe5 Bxe5 14.Nxe5 Qxe5 15.Qd4²)

(

http://www.chesszone.org

7.Qxc4 Bd6 8.Bg2 0–0 9.0–0 e5 10.Rd1]
6...dxe4 [Worse looks 6...Bb4 because of
catching of space advantage 7.e5 Ne4
8.Be2 Nb6?!

8...f5!?

9.Qc2 (9.cxd5!?

exd5

(9...Nxd5? 10.Qxe4 Nxc3 11.bxc3

Bxc3+ 12.Bd2 Bxa1 13.0–0 Bb2 14.Bb4±

9 ..cxd5? 10.Qb5++-; 9 ..Qxd5 10.0–0

Nxc3 11.bxc3±)

10.0–0 Bf5 11.Qe3²)

9...Nxc3 10.bxc3 Be7 11.c5 (11.cxd5!?
exd5

11...cxd5?! 12.0–0²; 11...Nxd5

12.0–0 c5 13 Bb2 Bd7 14.Qe4 Bc6

15.Qg4²)

12.h3 Be6 13.0–0 Qd7²)

11...Nd7 12.c4² spaces defect take dis-
comfort to Black, and the only way to get
rid from it is to make weaknesses.] 7.Nxe4
Nxe4 [7...c5 8.Nxf6+ Nxf6 9.Bd2 cxd4
10.Nxd4 Bc5 11.Nb3 Qxd3 12.Bxd3 Be7²
1–0 Meister,Y (2415)-Belikov,V
(2375)/Kuibyshev 1990/CBM 021 (59)]
8.Qxe4 Bb4+ To smooth over some
Whites' space advantage(4 lines for ma-
neuvers versus 3) black tries to exchange
some piece to escape crush 9.Bd2 Bxd2+
10.Nxd2

(

)

;

(

XABCDEFGHY

8r+lwqk+-tr(

7zpp+n+pzpp'

6-+p+p+-+&

5+-+-+-+-%

4-+PzPQ+-+$

3+-+-+-+-#

2PzP-sN-zPPzP"

1tR-+-mKL+R!

xabcdefghy

10...c5 That move is used to avoid varia-
tion with 0–0–0, especially as this position
already happended in David's game with
Akopian in Ordix-open [10...0–0 11.0–0–
0 c5 12.Nf3 cxd4 13.Qxd4 Qe7 14.Bd3
Nc5 15.Bc2 b6 16.b4 Nb7 17.Qh4 Qxh4
18.Nxh4 1–0 Navara,D (2656)-Akopian,V
(2708)/Mainz GER 2007/The Week in
Chess 667 (54)] 11.dxc5 [Now Black can't
play 11.0–0–0 because of 11...Nf6]
11...Qa5 12.a3 Qxc5 [Worse was
12...Nxc5 because of 13.Qe3 Qc7 14.b4

Nd7 15.Ne4! and White takes control over
important squares d6 and f6, at the same
time blocks the best way of Black piece
development 15...b6 16.Rd1 0–0 17.Qg3
Qe5 18.Qxe5 Nxe5 19.Nd6 Bd7 20.Be2
Ba4 21.Rd2 Rfd8 22.f4 Ng6 23.Bf3 Rab8
24.g3² ½–½ Benjamin,J (2576)-
Christiansen,L (2575)/ICC INT 2007/The
Week in Chess 676 (47)] 13.Bd3 [It was
too early for 13.b4 because White's pawn
can be attacked immidiately 13...Qe7
14.Bd3 a5 15.Rb1 axb4 16.axb4 Nf6
17.Qe3 0–0= 0–1 Kasimdzhanov,R
(2690)-Nakamura,H (2648)/Bastia FRA
2007/The Week in Chess 678 (41)]
13...Nf6 14.Qe2 0–0 The strongest, I think
[14...b6 Makes an object, which White
can attack by c-pawn in future 15.b4 Qc7
16.0–0 Bb7 17.Rac1 0–0 18.c5 bxc5
19.Rxc5² ½–½ Sokolov,I (2620)-
Thorhallsson,T (2495)/Elista 1998/CBM
066 ext (46)] 15.0–0 The opening is over.
White have a good position, but Black
have no weaknesses, so they can rely on
equal 15...Rd8 16.b4 Qc7 [16...Qd4 is bad
17.Nf3 Qxd3?? 18.Rad1+-; If Black will try
to change Queens 16...Qh5 White will
have strong move 17.Ne4! Qxe2 18.Nxf6+
gxf6 19.Bxe2² because of potential
weakness on h7 white have some advan-
tage] 17.Rac1

XABCDEFGHY

8r+ltr-+k+(

7zppwq-+pzpp'

6-+-+psn-+&

5+-+-+-+-%

4-zPP+-+-+$

3zP-+L+-+-#

2-+-sNQzPPzP"

1+-tR-+RmK-!

xabcdefghy

17...Bd7! keeps b-pawn on a basic place
18.c5 Bc6= 19.Nf3 [deserved of attention
19.Nc4!? with the view of catching d6-
square 19...Rd5

(19...Nd5 20.Qe4 Nf6

21.Qe5 Qxe5 22.Nxe5 Ba4=)

20.Nd6 Rd8

http://www.chesszone.org

(20...Ne8 21.b5 Bd7 22.Ne4²; 20...b6

21.Ne4 bxc5 22.Nxf6+ gxf6 23.Be4 Re5

24.Rxc5²)

] 19...Rd5?! Maneuver in Lask-

ers style is not good. Black should take on
this square their knight [¹19...Nd5!?
20.Bc4

(20.Qe5? Qxe5 21.Nxe5 Nf4µ)

20...Nf4 21.Qe3 Rac8=] 20.Bc4 Rh5 It
was not late to return.... 21.g3 a5 Sud-
denly black has problems with good
moves. Computer says, that position is
equal, but black have more problem with
finding a good plan 22.Nd4 Bd5 [Better
was 22...Re5!? 23.Qb2 axb4 24.axb4
h5„ trying to make a counterplay]
23.Nb5² Qc6 24.Nd6 axb4?! [Black
should trade bishops here 24...Bxc4
25.Qxc4 and bring a rook back to life
25...Rd5 26.Rfd1 axb4 27.axb4 h6 , and
white will work hard to prove his small ad-
vantage] 25.Bb5! Qc7™ [25...Bf3??
26.Bxc6 Bxe2 27.Bxb7+-] 26.axb4 b6?? A
mistake. Black misses white's neat tacti-
cal idea!

XABCDEFGHY

8r+-+-+k+(

7+-wq-+pzpp'

6-zp-sNpsn-+&

5+LzPl+-+r%

4-zP-+-+-+$

3+-+-+-zP-#

2-+-+QzP-zP"

1+-tR-+RmK-!

xabcdefghy

[26...g6 27.Ra1²] 27.Ne8! Qe5 [27...Rxe8
28.Bxe8 g6 29.Ba4 White must win]
28.Qxe5 Rxe5 29.Nc7 Rb8 30.Na6 Ra8
31.cxb6+- Bg2?? Experienced Grandmas-
ter has being losing his own piece, but his
position already was hopeless 32.Kxg2
1–0

(10) Harikrishna,P (2668) - Landa,K
(2678) [C54]

50th It Reggio Emilia ITA (9), 06.01.2008

[Khusnutdinov,Rustam]

1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d3 Nc6 4.Nf3 With

transposition of the moves we come to
well-known variation, that was introduced
into practice by GM Sergey Makarichev.
White prefer to increase center, develop
pieces at first, and then in comfortable
moment make d3-d4 promotion. 4...Bc5
Goes to Italian. Other popular lines are
[4...Be7 5.0–0 0–0 6.Bb3 d5 7.exd5 Nxd5
8.Re1

(8.h3!? a5 9.a3 a4 10.Ba2 Kh8

11.Re1 f6 12.d4 exd4 13.Nxd4 Ndb4

14.axb4 Qxd4 15.c3 Qxd1 16.Rxd1 Bf5

17.Na3 Ne5 18 Nb5 c5 19.bxc5 Bxc5

20.Nd4=

½–½ Kramnik,V (2715)-

Kasparov,G (2805)/New York 1995/CBM
047 ext (41)

)

8...Bg4 (8...Bf6 Hansen,Cu

9.Nbd2

(9.h3 Re8 10.Nbd2 Na5 11.Nc4

Nxc4 12.dxc4 e4 13.Qxd5 exf3=

Groene-

gress,W-Seegers,H/BL 8384 Muenster-
Enger [7] 1983/0–1 (58)

)

9...Bg4 10.h3

Bh5 11.Ne4 Nf4 12.Ng3 Bxf3 13.Qxf3 Rb8

13...Ng6 14.Ba4 Qd7 15.Bd2 Be7

16.Bc3 f6 17.Nf5 Rfd8 18.Qg4 Bf8 19 Re4

Rab8 20.Bb3+ Kh8 21.Qxg6

1–0 De-

graeve,J.M-Slobodjan,R/Montpellier
1993

)

14.Qe4 Ng6 15.c3 Bg5 16.Nf5±

Beliavsky,A-Agzamov,G/URS 31/(376)
1981) 9.h3

(9.Nbd2

Hansen,Cu

9...f6

10.h3 Bh5 11.c3 Kh8 12.Ne4 Qd7=

Pi-

kula,D-Petronijevic,Z/YUG-chT (Cetinje)
1993 (42)

)

9...Bh5 (9...Bxf3 10.Qxf3 Nd4

(10 ..Nb6 11.Nc3 Bg5 12.Be3 Bxe3

13.Rxe3 Kh8=

Armas,I-Garcia Pal-

ermo,C/BL 8990 Koblenz-Delmenhorst
[1] 1990 (36)

)

11.Qxd5 (11.Qd1 Bc5

(11...Nxb3 12.axb3 f6

(12. Bf6)

13.Nc3

Nb4 14.Be3 f5 15.Bd2 Nc6 16.Nb5 Bf6
17.Be3 Qd7 18.Na3= Kosten,A-
Dreev,A/Reykjavik Summit 1990/½–½
(48)) 12.Nc3 Nxb3 13.axb3 Bd4 14.Bd2
c6 15.Nxd5 cxd5 16.Bc3 Bxc3 17.bxc3
Qc7 18.c4 ½–½ Gipslis,A-Van Riems-
dijk,H/Groningen op (08) 1990) 11...Qxd5
12.Bxd5 Nxc2 13.Bd2 Nxa1 14.Rc1 Han-
sen,Cu 14...Rad8 15.Nc3 c6 16.Bf3 Rxd3
17.Be3 Bb4 18.Be2 Rd7 19.Rxa1 Ba5
20.Na4

(20 Rd1 Rxd1+ 21.Bxd1 Rd8

22.Bc2 Bb6 23.Nb1 Bxe3 24.fxe3 g6³

Dizdar,S-Mikhalchishin,A/Zenica (01)
1989 (42)

)

20...b6 21.Rc1 Rd6 22.Kf1=

(

http://www.chesszone.org

Fossan,E-Emms,J/Gausdal Troll (05)
1992/½–½ (63)) 10.g4 Bg6 11.Nxe5 Nxe5
12.Rxe5 c6© It looks like Marshall attack
in Rui Lopez . Black has enough compen-
sation for a pawn; 4...h6 with idea to de-
velop bishop on g7 5.0–0 d6

(5...g6

also possible. There are no enough
games with this variation, so there is a lot
of space for "creative"

6.c3 Bg7 7.d4 Qe7

8.Re1 0–0 9.Bb5! d6 10 Bxc6 bxc6

11.dxe5 dxe5 12.Qa4 Qe6 13.Be3 a5

14.Nbd2 Nd7 15.Qb3 Re8 16.Qxe6 Rxe6

17.a4²

white has stable advantage in

endgame½–½ Tiviakov,S (2520)-
Sorokin,M (2500)/Kherson 1991/CBM
021 ext (56)

)

] 5.c3 White ensures bish-

ops maneuver c4-b3-c2 in same time
takes control over d4 and b4 squares for
pawn promotion 5...a6 helpful move, simi-
lar white's c2-c3 move 6.Bb3 d6 7.0–0
The main line

(

XABCDEFGHY

8r+lwqk+-tr(

7+pzp-+pzpp'

6p+nzp-sn-+&

5+-vl-zp-+-%

4-+-+P+-+$

3+LzPP+N+-#

2PzP-+-zPPzP"

1tRNvLQ+RmK-!

xabcdefghy

[Other way was knight's maneuver 7.Nbd2
0–0 8.h3 Ba7 9.Nf1 d5 10.Qe2

(10 exd5

Nxd5 11.Ng3 f6 12.0–0 Be6 13.Re1 Qd7

14.d4 exd4 15.cxd4 Bf7=

½–½ Movse-

sian,S (2667)-Akopian,V (2708)/Carlsbad
CZE 2007/The Week in Chess 670 (60)

)

10...Be6! 11.Bg5

(11.Ng3 dxe4 12.dxe4

Bxb3 13.axb3 Ne8 14.Nf5 Nd6 15 0–0

Q 6 16.Bg5 Qe6 17.Nxd6 Qxd6 18.Qc4

Rfe8 19.Rfd1 Qe6 20.Qxe6 Rxe6 21.Rd7

f6 22.Bd2 Re7 23 Rxe7

½–½ Tiviakov,S

(2669)-Leko,P (2740)/Wijk aan Zee
2006/CBM 111

)

11...dxe4 12.dxe4 Bxb3

13.axb3 Qd6 14.Ng3 Qe6 15.b4 Ne8
16.0–0 f6 17.Be3 Bxe3 18.fxe3 Nd6

19.Rf2 a5 20.bxa5 Nxa5 21.Nh4 g6
22.Raf1 Nb3 23.Qc2 Ra1 24.Nf3 Rxf1+
25.Nxf1 Nc5 26.N3d2 b5 27.Kh2 ½–½
Movsesian,S (2647)-Topalov,V (2737)/
Tripoli 2004/CBM 102] 7...0–0 8.Bg5
[8.Nbd2 Ba7 9.h3

(9.Nc4)

; 8.h3 h6 9.Re1

Ba7 10.Nbd2 Nh5 11.Nf1 Qf6 12.Be3 Nf4
13.Kh2 Be6 14.d4 Bxb3 15.axb3 Ng6
16.Ng3 Nh4 17.Nxh4 Qxh4 18.Nf5 Qf6
19.dxe5 Qxe5+ 20.f4 Qf6 21.Bxa7 Rxa7
22.Qg4 Raa8 23.Ne3 Ne7 24.Qf3 Qg6
25.Ra5 f6 26.b4 Rae8 27.b5 axb5
28.Rxb5 b6 29.c4 Kh7 30.Nd5 Nxd5
31.cxd5 Re7 32.Rb3 Ra8 33.Rbe3 Ra4
34.Qe2 Rd4 35.b3 ½–½ Kramnik,V
(2777)-Radjabov,T (2656)/Linares 2004/
CBM 100/; 8.Be3 Bxe3 9.fxe3 Ne7

9...Be6 10.Nbd2 Bxb3 11.Qxb3 b5 12.a4

Na5 13.Qa2 c5 14.h3 b4 15.Rf2 Rb8

½–½

Yu Shaoteng (2516)-Harikrishna,P
(2673)/Khanty Mansiysk 2005/CBM 111

)

10.Nbd2 Ng6 11.Qe1 c6 12.Nh4 a5
13.Nxg6 hxg6 14.a4 d5 15.exd5 cxd5
16.Nf3 Qb6 17.Ba2 Re8= ½–½ Tiviakov,S
(2631)-Morozevich,A (2707)/Bled 2002/
EXT 2003 (55)] 8...h6 [8...Ba7 9.Nbd2
Ne7

9...Kh8 10.Nc4 Ne7 11.Ne3 Ng4

12.h3 Nxe3 13.Bxe3 Ng6 14.d4 Qe7

15.Re1 f6 16 Nd2 Be6 17.Nf1 Q 7

18.Bxe6 Qxe6 19.Ng3 Ne7 20.Qc2 Kg8=

½–½ Tiviakov,S (2700) - Korneev, O
(2601)/Khanty Mansiysk 2005/CBM 111
(43)

; 9...h6 10.Be3 Ne7 11.Nh4 Bg4

12.Qe1 g5 13 Nh 3 Ng6 14.d4 Qe7

15.dxe5 dxe5 16.Bxa7 Rxa7 17.Qe3 Raa8

18.Nc4 a5 19.a4 Ra6 20.Ne1 Nf4 21.f3

Be6 22.g3 Ng6 23.Nd3 Rd8 24.Rad1

½–½

Efimenko,Z (2643)-Pavlovic,M
(2471)/Vrnjacka Banja 2005/EXT 2006

)

10.Nc4 Ng6 11.Nh4 Bg4 12.Bxf6 Qxf6
13.Qxg4 Qxh4 14.Qxh4 Nxh4= ½–½
Nunn,J (2565)-Karpov,A (2700)/Hamburg
1982/MCD (41)] 9.Be3 The novelty on the
high level. Earlier white developed bishop
on e3 without Bg5. [the main move is
9.Bh4 g5 10.Bg3

(10 Nxg5!? hxg5

11.Bxg5 Kh7 12.Q 3 Kg6 13.Bh4 Rg8ч)

10...Bg4

(10 ..Ba7 11.Nbd2 Bg4 12.Kh1

Bh5 13.Qe1 Kg7 14.Bd1 Bg6 15.Nc4 Re8

http://www.chesszone.org

16.Bc2 Qd7 17.Qd2 Rad8 18.a4 Nh5

19.b4 d5 20 exd5 Qxd5 21.b5 e4 22.Ne3

Bxe3 23.fxe3 Nxg3+ 24.hxg3 exf3

25.bxc6 Rxe3 26 Qxe3 fxg2+ 27.Kh2

gxf1N+ 28.Rxf1 Qxc6 29.Qe5+ Kg8

30.Rf2 Re8

0–1 Chandler,M (2485)-

Karpov,A (2710)/Bath 1983/MCD

)

11.Nbd2 Nh5 12.Kh1 Ng7 13.h3 Bh5
14.Bh2 Kh8 15.Nc4 Qf6 16.g4 Bg6
17.Ne3 Ne6 18.Nf5 Ba7 19.Qe2 Rae8
20.Rae1 Bh7 21.Nd2 Ne7 22.Qf3 h5
23.Nc4 Nf4 24.Bc2 Neg6 25.Nce3 h4
26.Ng2 Nxg2 27.Kxg2 Qd8 28.Bb3 f6
29.Kh1 Ne7 30.Nh6 Kg7 31.Nf5+ Nxf5
32.gxf5 Bg8 33.Qh5 Bf7 34.Bxf7 Rxf7
35.Rd1 c5 36.c4 Kf8 ½–½ Shanava,K
(2532)-Sargissian,G (2651)/Dresden GER
2007] 9...Ng4!? Very interesting move.
Black exchange advantage for strength-
ening white's center and giving half-open
line "f" [other way was 9...Bxe3 - see
8.Be3 Bxe3 10.fxe3 Ne7 11.Nbd2 Ng6
12.Qe1 c6] 10.d4 [10.Bxc5 with pawn on
c3 this exchange is not good, because
d3-pawn became week. 10...dxc5]
10...Ba7 11.Nbd2

(

XABCDEFGHY

8r+lwq-trk+(

7vlpzp-+pzp-'

6p+nzp-+-zp&

5+-+-zp-+-%

4-+-zPP+n+$

3+LzP-vLN+-#

2PzP-sN-zPPzP"

1tR-+Q+RmK-!

xabcdefghy

11...Ne7 One's again standard maneuver
for this variation [But It is interesting to try
11...Na5!? with idea to take away pres-
sure from f7-pawn 12.Bc2 c5= Black's
position is not worse] 12.h3 Forces ex-
change 12...Nxe3 13.fxe3 exd4 Black tries
to open position to show the power [В
случае 13...Ng6 14.Qe1 Kh7 15.Qg3 f5
16.exf5 Bxf5 17.h4!? Bd3

(17...e4?

18.Ng5+! hxg5 19.Rxf5! Rxf5 20.Qg4±)

18.Rf2² White saves some advantage,
'cause bishop on a7 is off as be-
fore.

(18 Ng5+ hxg5 19.hxg5 d5 20.Qh3+

Kg8 21.Qe6+=)

] 14.exd4 c5 Landa con-

tinues to "clear the road" for bishop
[14...d5 15.Kh1 c5] 15.Kh1 cxd4?!
[15...d5! is more perspective - blocks
bishop on b3 16.dxc5 Bxc5 17.exd5 Nf5

17...Nxd5? 18.Ne4)

18.Ne4 Ne3 19.Qd3

(19.Qe1 Ba7)

16.Nxd4! 2 white pieces have already at-
tacked f7-square... [16.cxd4 d5=] 16...d5
17.N2f3 dxe4? Black obvious underesti-
mate white's pressure on f7. It was neces-
sary to take control over e5-square
[17...Qd6 18.Qe2 Be6 19.Rae1²;
17...Bb8!? 18.Qd3 dxe4 19.Qxe4 Qd6
20.Rad1²] 18.Ne5± Be6 [18...Kh7
19.Nxf7 Qa5 20.Qe2+-] 19.Nxe6 Qxd1

XABCDEFGHY

8r+-+-trk+(

7vlp+-snpzp-'

6p+-+N+-zp&

5+-+-sN-+-%

4-+-+p+-+$

3+LzP-+-+P#

2PzP-+-+P+"

1tR-+q+R+K!

xabcdefghy

20.Nxf8!! Nice and strong shot! [worse
was 20.Raxd1 fxe6 21.Bxe6+ Kh7 22.Nf7ƒ
but white saving the iniciative too

(22.Rxf8

Rxf8 23.Rd7?? Rf1+ 24.Kh2 Bb8 )

]

20...Qxb3 [20...Qxf1+ 21.Rxf1 Rxf8

(21...Kxf8 22.Rxf7+ Ke8 23.Rxg7+-)

22.Nxf7 Rb8 23.Nd6+ Kh8 24.Nxe4 White
has extra pawn+initiaciative] 21.axb3 Rxf8
22.g4 Harikrishna tries to prevent conec-
tion of black pawns. [The other way was
22.Rad1!? e3 23.Rd7 e2 24.Re1 Nf5
25.g4™ Bf2 26.Rxe2 Ng3+ 27.Kg2 Nxe2
28.Kxf2 b5 29.Kxe2 Re8 30.Rd5 f6
31.Ke3 fxe5 32.Rd6 and because of their
very active pieces, white must win]
22...Nd5 23.Rae1 Re8 24.Rf5 g6?
[24...Ne3?? 25.Rxf7 Rxe5 26.Rxb7+-; the

http://www.chesszone.org

only way was 24...Ne7 25.Rf4 e3© with
some compensation] 25.Nxg6! Ne3?!
[¹25...Nxc3 but after 26.Nf4 Nb5
27.Nh5+- White has wining position]
26.Re5+- Russian GM probably missed
this move 26...Rd8 27.Nf4 Nd1 28.Rd5
Nf2+ 29.Kg2 1–0

(11) Ni Hua (2641) - Marin,Mi (2551)
[C54]

50th It Reggio Emilia ITA (9), 06.01.2008

[Khusnutdinov,Rustam]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.c3 Nf6
5.d4 [5.d3 is more popular] 5...exd4 6.e5
This variant often used by Poland GM B.
Macieja. Nowadays there are no advan-
tage for white. [6.cxd4 Bb4+ 7.Bd2

(7.Nc3 Nxe4 8.0–0 Bxc3 9.d5 Ne5

10.bxc3 Nxc4 11.Qd4 0–0 12.Qxe4 Nd6

13.Qd3 b6 14.Ba3 Q 6 15.Qd4 Qxd4

16.Nxd4 Bb7³

0–1 Comp Fritz 6-Anand,V

(2781)/Frankfurt 1999/CBM 072 (45)

)

7...Bxd2+ 8.Nbxd2 d5 9.exd5 Nxd5
10.Qb3 Nce7 11.0–0 0–0=] 6...d5 This
and some next move are forced 7.Bb5
Ne4 8.cxd4 Bb6 the first deviation [Much
more popular is 8...Bb4+ 9.Bd2

(9.Nbd2

0–0 10.a3 Bxd2+ 11.Bxd2 Bg4 12.Bxc6

bxc6 13.Rc1 f6 14.Bb4 Re8³

0–1 Asa-

nov,B (2200)-Vladimirov,E (2550)/Alma-
Ata 1989/EXT 1997 (30)

)

9...Nxd2

10.Bxc6+ bxc6 11.Nbxd2 c5 12.a3 Bxd2+
13.Qxd2 c4

(13...Bg4 14.dxc5 Bxf3

15 gx 3 0–0©

1–0 Macieja,B (2635)-

Aleksandrov,A (2664)/Plovdiv 2003/CBM
098 (61)

)

14.0–0 Rb8 15.Rfe1 0–0

16.Qc2 g6 17.Nd2 Qg5 18.Re3 Qg4
19.Qc3 c5 20.Nf3 cxd4 21.Nxd4 Rb6= ½–
½ Sveshnikov,E (2508)-Stefansson,H
(2549)/Liepaya 2004/CBM 103 (25)]
9.Nc3 the struggle goes near bishop on
b6 - either it will be paralyse white's foces
against defense of d4-pawn, or will be
turned off for a long time. That's why pri-
mary task for white is to strengthen that
pawn. In that reason exchange on c3 al-
most always is bad for black. [Somewhat
weaker is another way to develop queen-
side 9.Be3 0–0 10.Nbd2?! in view of

10...Nxd2! 11.Kxd2™

(11.Bxd2 Nxd4;

11.Nxd2 Nxd4; 11.Qxd2 Ba5)

11...Bg4

12.Bxc6 bxc6 13.Qa4 Bxf3 14.gxf3 f6ƒ 0–
1 Sveshnikov,E (2545)-Morovic Fernan-
dez,I (2470)/Rio de Janeiro 1985/EXT
1999 (41); 9.h3!? Bd7 10.Bd3?!

(10.a4!?

10 Be2!?)

10...Nb4! 11.Be2?!

(11.0–0=)

11...c5 12.Be3 cxd4 13.Nxd4 Nc6³ 0–1
Vachier Lagrave,M (2573)-Eljanov,P
(2675)/Wijk aan Zee NED 2007/The Week
in Chess 638 (29)] 9...0–0 10.Be3
[10.Bxc6 bxc6 11.Be3 f5 12.exf6 Qxf6
13.Nxe4? dxe4 14.Nd2 Ba6 15.Nxe4
Ba5+ 16.Nc3 Bxc3+ 17.bxc3 Qg6
18.Rb1?! Bd3 19.Rb7 Bc2 20.Qe2 Rab8
21.Qc4+ Kh8 22.Rxb8 Rxb8–+ 23.Ke2
Rb2 24.Qc5 Bb3+ 25.Kf3 Bd5+ 26.Kf4
Qe4+ 27.Kg3 Qxg2+ 28.Kh4 Qxh1 0–1
Macieja, B (2653) - Veskovi, G (2633)/
Bermuda 2004/CBM 098] 10...Bg4
[10...Ne7 11.0–0

(11.Bd3 Nxc3 12.bxc3

Bf5 13.0–0 Qd7 14.Nh4 Bxd3 15.Qxd3 f5

16.Bg5 Ng6 17.Nxg6 hxg6 18 a4 c6 19.e6

½–½ Moro-

zevich,A (2595)-Malaniuk,V (2610)/ Kras-
nodar 1997/EXT 2000

)

11...c6 12.Bd3

Nxc3 13.bxc3 Bf5 14.Nh4 Bxd3 15.Qxd3
Qd7 16.f4² ½–½ Macieja,B (2633)-
Aronian,L (2645)/ Antalya 2004/CBM 101
(44)] 11.Qc2!? Ni Hua's patent. White's
idea is to crush knight on e4.exchange
own bishop on c6 and play against off-
bishop on b6 [11.Bxc6 bxc6 12.Qa4

(12.h3 Be6 12.0–0)

12...c5

(12. Bd7

13.Qa3 f5 14.exf6 Nxf6 15.0–0–0 Bg4

16.Qa6 Qd6 17.a4 Rab8 18.Rd2 Bc8

19.Qd3 Ba5 20.Rc2 Ng4 21.Re2 Bf5

22.Qd2 Rb3 23.Bf4 Qb4 24.Rhe1 Qc4

0–1

Mannion,S (2331)-Mikhalevski,V
(2572)/Port Erin 2005/CBM 108 ext

)

13.dxc5 Bxf3 14.gxf3 Nxc5 15.Bxc5 Bxc5
16.0–0–0 Bxf2 17.Nxd5 Qh4 18.Qxh4
Bxh4= ½–½ Macieja,B (2592) - Gra-
barczyk, M (2484)/ Warsaw 2005/CBM
110 ext (52)] 11...Bxf3?! In my opinion,
the first mistake. It is not right to open
lines on the King's side, because many
black's pieces are sticked on the queen's
side and they can't help their own king in

. f

;

http://www.chesszone.org

few time. [More solid is 11...Bf5 12.Qb3
Ne7 13.Be2 c6 14.0–0 f6 15.exf6 Rxf6
16.Ne5 Ng6 17.Na4 Nxe5 18.Nxb6 axb6
19.dxe5 Rg6„ ½–½ Ni Hua (2641)-
Navara,D (2656)/Reggio Emilia ITA
2007/The Week in Chess 686 (44)]
12.gxf3 Ng5 black tries to use some expo-
sure of white's pawns. But white's argu-
ment( space advantage, open "g" line)
looks stronger.

XABCDEFGHY

8r+-wq-trk+(

7zppzp-+pzpp'

6-vln+-+-+&

5+L+pzP-sn-%

4-+-zP-+-+$

3+-sN-vLP+-#

2PzPQ+-zP-zP"

1tR-+-mK-+R!

xabcdefghy

13.Bxc6? Not clear perform of the right
idea. It was necessary to castle at first.
[the better was 13.0–0–0! Nxf3 14.Bxc6
bxc6 15.Qe2 and with transposition we
came to position on the game] 13...bxc6?
Black didn't use his chance! [13...Nxf3+!
14.Ke2 Nxd4+ 15.Bxd4 Bxd4 16.Bxb7

(16 Bxd5 Bxc3 17.Rad1 Bxe5 18.Bxf7+

16...Rb8 17.Bc6

Qh4‚ the struggle are going to all 3 re-
sults] 14.0–0–0 Nxf3 else black will suffer
for "free" 15.Qe2 Nh4 [15...Ng5 16.f4 Ne4
17.Nxe4 dxe4 18.f5‚ - Black is hard to
make a counter-play on the Queen's side,
while whtie's initiative is delevoped with-
out any obstacles] 16.Rhg1 f6! the best
chance [16...Qd7 17.Qh5 Nf5 18.Bh6
Nxh6 19.Qxh6

(19 Rxg7+ Kxg7 20.Qg5+

Kh8=)

19...f6

(19...g6 20.Rd3±)

20.e6

Qe7 21.Ne2ƒ; 16...Ng6!? 17.Rg3

(17.Qh5

Qh4)

17...Ba5 18.Na4

(18.Qh5 Bxc3

19.bxc3 Qe7„

18...Rb8 19.Rdg1

(19.Qh5 Qh4

19...Qh4

(19 ..Rb4 20.Qh5

Rxa4 21.Rh3 h6 22.Bxh6+-)

20.f4 f5

21.Qf3ƒ] 17.Qh5

)

XABCDEFGHY

8r+-wq-trk+(

7zp-zp-+-zpp'

6-vlp+-zp-+&

5+-+pzP-+Q%

4-+-zP-+-sn$

3+-sN-vL-+-#

2PzP-+-zP-zP"

1+-mKR+-tR-!

xabcdefghy

17...Ng6? Passive defense is doomed for
misfortune [it was necessary radically
change the way of the struggle 17...fxe5!?
18.Bg5 Qd7 19.Qxh4 Bxd4 but after
20.Rxd4 exd4 21.Qxd4 I prefer white's
position] 18.Rg3± fxe5 19.Rh3 Qf6?
[19...Kf7™ 20.Rg1 Rh8 21.Qf5+ Qf6
22.Qd7+ Qe7 23.Rf3+ Kg8 24.Qxc6±]
20.Rg1!‚ White's attack is irresistible
20...exd4 21.Qxh7+ Kf7 22.Rxg6 Qxg6
23.Rf3+ Qf6 24.Rxf6+ Kxf6 25.Qh4+ Ke5
26.Qe7+ Kf5 27.Qd7+ Kg6 28.Bxd4+-
White has material and position advantage
plus attack on the black king. Is this stage
Chinese GM was exact 28...Bxd4 29.Qg4+
Kh7 30.Qxd4 Rf6 31.Nd1! Knight goes to
the King side 31...a6 32.Ne3 Re8 33.Ng4
Rfe6 34.Qd3+ Kh8 35.Qxa6 c5 36.Qd3 c4
37.Qh3+ [Other way was 37.Qxd5 ]
37...Kg8 38.Ne3 c6 39.Qg4 Rf6 40.Qd7
Re4 41.Nf5 Rf7 42.Qd8+ [42.Qd8+ Rf8
43.Qg5 Rf7 44.Nh6+] 1–0

http://www.chesszone.org

Editorial staff:

IM Anatoliy Polivanov (ELO 2391)

IM Rustam Khusnutdinov (ELO 2452)

IM Dmitry Kryakvin (ELO 2532)

Chief editor Roman Viliavin (ELO 2239)

email:

chesszone@ya.ru

Document Outline

Our supporters:
News
Games
Editorial staff:

ChessZone Magazine ENG, 2 (2008)

Document Outline