Title:
Humor, learning, and socialization in middle level classrooms. By: Pollak, Judy P., Freda, Paul D., Clearing House,
00098655, Mar/Apr97, Vol. 70, Issue 4
When students are asked to identify characteristics that describe exemplary teachers, one of the first descriptors offered is, invariably,
a sense of humor. Students point to their favorite instructors as teachers who made them laugh in a variety of ways and made class
fun. Glasser (1986), who includes fun in his list of the five primary needs of humans, along with survival, belonging, power, and
freedom, indicates that all of our behavior is our constant attempt to satisfy one or more of those needs. He points out that a "good
comedian is always a good teacher." He reminds us that the clear, sharp, but unexpected insights of a comic like Bill Cosby are so
"filled with learning that we cannot fail to laugh" (29). Fun, according to Glasser, is difficult to define, but it is associated with laughter,
play, and entertainment. It is the part of the job of teaching that we don't have to do, but "doing it may be the best part" (28).
Humor involves more than jokes and laughter, however; it involves a positive spin on reality as opposed to a negative one. The
negative view deals with sarcasm and cynicism, but this negative side of humor is rarely appropriate in the classroom setting. Sarcasm
and cynicism diminish learning, enhance stereotypes, and actually limit a person's perspective. Negative humor is the antithesis of
learning; it is to remain close-minded. For example, the media often uses negative humor to portray characters as "cool," hip, above
the rest, or unaffected in order to provide a quick release mechanism for dealing with adversity. In the classroom, though, rather than
adopting the glibness of negative humor, teachers could model the positive aspects of the humor of everyday life as a better way to
deal with those adverse situations. If one of the tasks of adolescence is to achieve a balance between conformity and rebellion, then
the role of the teacher is an important one in assisting students as they attempt that process. Teachers can use positive humor to help
students to achieve that balance.
Humor is a social skill that helps a student to cope with stress, enhance his or her sense of well-being, alleviate unhappiness,
depression, and anxiety, and boost self-image. Humor affects students' physiology and psychology, stimulates creative and flexible
thinking, facilitates learning, and improves interest and attention in the classroom. Although humor-related behavior exceeds all other
types of emotional behaviors combined (Keith-Spiegel 1969), little research has been done into laughter in general and into the use of
laughter and humor in the middle level classroom in particular. The purpose of this discussion, then, is to examine uses of humor in
middle level classrooms and relationships between humor and effective teaching.
Middle level teachers use humor in a variety of ways in their classrooms. Humor, for example, can be an extremely useful tool in
building rapport. If a teacher can laugh at him- or herself and laugh with (never at) students, that teacher is well on the way to
establishing a positive climate and eliminating much of the stress that is often present in classrooms today. Students may never give a
teacher the chance to share knowledge or brilliant insights if rapport is not established first. When teachers confront a negative
student with humor, they often find that this use of humor is an effective way to diffuse the student's anger and hostility. It is crucial,
however, that a student never feel that he or she is being made the object of ridicule. In such a situation, although the teacher may
dominate the student for the moment, often deep and strong resentments result that may last throughout the school year (Quina
1989).
It is instructive to look at the case of Sara, a middle level English teacher, who walked into her classroom one day and found that the
students had come in early and turned everything in the room upside down--from the furniture to the posters on the wall. Sara
laughed at the joke and told students that she "found it interesting to see life from a different perspective." For the remainder of the
year, she and the students joked about "different perspectives." Rapport was strong in Sara's class, and she credited the day the
students played a practical joke on her as the beginning of that rapport. According to Quina (1989), if a teacher and students can
laugh together, they can most likely work together and plan together as well.
Control is another area in which humor can serve teachers well. Middle school students are seeking independence and security
simultaneously, and the middle school is a place that can empower students to establish their independence as students in a safe
atmosphere. This atmosphere is greatly enhanced by the use of humor. Teachers who present themselves as continual learners help
students form a community of learners in the classroom, with the teacher as a member of the "learning team." The function of the
teacher, then, is not merely to teach, but to teach how to learn. Thus, the differences between teacher and learner are minimized and
the similarities are maximized, giving students a feeling of control. If a teacher cannot laugh at what he or she does not know, then
how can students be expected to recognize their own educational needs and be truly willing, even anxious, to learn? For example, if an
English teacher puts a sentence on the board to label parts of speech and a student points out a mistake the teacher has made in
labeling one of the more complicated components, that teacher has several options. One is to deny the mistake; another is to pretend
that the mistake was made on purpose; another is to own the error, thereby revealing his or her humanness and ability to recover.
Therein lies the humor, the ability to enjoy a joke at one's own expense. Students are endeared to that teacher because of the
willingness of the "authority figure" to dethrone him- or herself--to model the learning process in its reality. The reality of learning is
that trial and error, stumble and recovery, are not only inevitable but crucial for real learning to take place.
Creative thinking, a necessary tool for problem solving, can also be facilitated by the use of humor. When employing brainstorming
techniques, for example, if a teacher offers a thought that is "incongruous or unexpected or incompatible" (Fry and Allen 1996, 247),
that input can help students see a situation in two very rational but drastically different perspectives. The essence of creative thinking,
therefore, is that ability to perceive situations from various points of view. The old adages "The grass is greener on the other side, but
pity the man who has to mow it" and "Every cloud has a silver lining, but unfortunately every silver lining comes with its cloud" are
examples of perspective. If students are to be problem solvers, they must be able to see mutually incompatible frames of reference.
Humor, particularly the use of unusual or even absurd examples, can accentuate those incompatibilities and insights.
A light or humorous touch can also grab a reluctant student's attention. Students tend to remember teachers who take the trouble to
express their messages in unusual ways. Csikszentmihalyi and McCormack (1995) tell the story of a student who remembers his
teacher, Mr. C., because "he has a special way of thinking that catches your attention. He makes brains go, he makes brains think, and
he says things in a way that you just can't forget them"(6).
Enthusiastic teachers spend time thinking about ways to present information in positive ways that will be memorable for students.
Instead of merely reading the witch scene from act 4 of Macbeth as homework or having students read it aloud in class, the teacher
can select students to dress as witches and act out the scene, making the project interactive instead of passive. After all, it is funnier
to dress up as witches than to read about them. This light touch affects not only attention-getting goals, but also creativity, ingenuity,
participation, and pride of ownership.
A successful learning process involves the assumption, "I can do it." Effective teachers begin from this premise--that the student is
able to master the subject. Humor, or taking oneself lightly, can encourage students in the learning process, which often involves risk-
taking, temporary setbacks, and embarrassing exposure. Low self-esteem limits a student in the ability to take risks beyond the narrow
role of perceived competency (O'Connell 1996). By using humor and the skill of laughing at oneself. a student can be more self-
forgiving, thereby allowing him- or herself to become lost in the learning process. A difficult part of the student role is to acknowledge
ignorance while simultaneously trusting in the ability to learn. This requires faith in oneself, an unshakable self-esteem that the
authoritarian role of teacher can sometimes undermine. By poking fun, at times, at their own frailties, teachers can show students that
being in the "one-down" position of the learner does not interfere with self-esteem. Only by admitting what they do not know can
students be open to learning what they need to know.
A final aspect of humor in the classroom touches on socialization, one of the major functions of schools: to acculturate knowledgeable,
understanding, compassionate, and empathetic new members to our society (Callahan, Clark, and Kellough 1992). Effective teachers
are individuals, according to Hageseth (1995), who can "take themselves lightly but take their work in life seriously as they encourage
others to do likewise" (56). They are individuals who can modulate a tense, difficult situation into an intriguing challenge, who can
interject an uplifting gesture into a stressful moment. As teachers, we can encourage our students to appreciate the universality of the
human condition, that we are all here to make the world work by complementing one another. We can model achieving power through
knowledge and equality, not through exploitation, manipulation, and one-upmanship. As we teach our various topics, we facilitate
learning through our enthusiastic, generous sharing of what we know, our laughing at our own foibles, and our encouragement to take
risks in the safe environment of the learning situation. The socialization process involves learning how to be--with ourselves, with
others, with our students and our teachers, and with life's adversities and challenges. We teach our students how to learn this valuable
skill, using humor as a tool of growth and wisdom.
Part of the function of teachers is to assist students as they become active seekers of knowledge. One goal of a teacher is to have
students not only enjoy the class, but also to learn to enjoy the subject matter. Csikszentmihalyi and McCormack (1995) indicate that
only after a student has learned to love learning does education truly begin. A college student in an Introduction to Secondary
Education class, who has recently been observing two middle school teachers, attests to the importance of humor in this quest for true
education when he writes the following in his journal:
I have observed two teachers, Ms. X, an 8th grade geography teacher, and Mr. Y, a 7th grade history teacher. They differ greatly in
their teaching styles. Ms. X is very strict with her students. She will raise her voice at the slightest provocation, and she has no qualms
at all about telling her students to shut up. I have seen her write discipline reports on a lot of students. Mr. Y, on the other hand, is the
exact opposite. He plays with the students; he teases them and has fun with them. They respect him. When he says be quiet, they do
it. I have never seen him even come close to writing a kid up. His students work hard for him and they learn to love history. He's the
kind of teacher I would like to be.
With the incorporation of humor into the classroom to facilitate rapport building, student empowerment, creative thinking, attention,
self-esteem, and socialization, middle level teachers indeed have the power to become the genesis for real education and a life-long
love of learning.
Callahan, J., L. Clark. and R. Kellough. 1992. Teaching in the middle and secondary schools. New York: Macmillan.
Clark, L., and I. Starr. 1986. Secondary and middle school teaching methods, New York: Macmillan.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., and J. McCormack. 1995. The influence of teachers. In Kaleidoscope: Readings in education, edited by K. Ryan
and J. Cooper, 2-8. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Fry, W., Jr., and M. Allen. 1996. Humor as a creative experience: The development of a Hollywood humorist. In Humor and laughter:
Theory, research, and applications, edited by R. Chapman and H. Foot, 245-58. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Glasser, W., M.D. 1986. Control theory in the classroom. New York: Harper and Row.
Hageseth, C., Ill, M.D. 1988. A laughing place. Fort Collins, Colo.: Berwick.
Keith-Spiegel, K. 1969. Preface to symposium proceedings. Social aspects of humor: Recent research and theory. Western
Psychological Association Meeting, Vancover.
O'Connell, W. 1996. "Freudian humour: The eupsychia of everyday life." In Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and applications,
edited by A. Chapman and H. Foot, 313-29. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Quina, J. 1989. Effective secondary teaching: Going beyond the hell curve. New York: Harper and Row.
~~~~~~~~
By JUDY P. POLLAK and PAUL D. FREDA
Judy P. Pollak, Ed.D., is an assistant professor in the Department of Instructional and Curricular Studies, University of Nevada-Las
Vegas. Paul D. Freda. M.D., is a psychiatrist with the Mental Health Corporation of Denver, Denver, Colorado.