6110C17 SHSpec-67 Problems Intensives Procedure

Heroic measures have been used, on the time track, when lighter efforts
to get into communication have failed. Brutality follows failed
communication; overts are always to be found in the wake of no-communication.
The auditor who gets annoyed with the PC has just failed to audit the PC; he
has just failed to get the PC to communicate. He has had no methodology, or
he hasn't applied it. If this were widespread, scientology would go the way
of all former religions -- towards ritual and brutality. The real overt is
not bad auditing, it's bad dissemination, i.e. bad teaching, bad comm of how
to apply, not insisting that it be done right. It's your inability to get
information from PC's which leads to your not trying to get any, which drives
you into a vicious frame of mind about PC's, which drives you into not wanting
to audit any at all. The auditor who has withholds won't ask for withholds.
If on top of that, he can't get information from the PC and doesn't know how
to go about it, he'll end up not auditing. That's why any auditor who is not
now auditing, isn't auditing: he's lost his confidence in his ability to
obtain the information necessary to resolve the case.

As long as you have social mores, people will violate them and go out of
comm with the group. The auditor-PC relationship is a group, and if they are
out of comm with a group, they will tend to be out of comm with all groups.
You've got to raise their group consciousness before you get an auditor-PC
relationship. So, by using the White Form, you get the withholds off from the
sections where they are likely to be concealing anything: present physical
condition, 2D stuff, crimes, past mental treatment, etc.

All societies set themselves up to be ill, because as soon as you have a
bunch of thou-shalt-nots, you will get the two phenomena of withholds and make
guilty. So you get people out of comm, no as-ising of those conditions, so
civilizations grow ill and die. When mores are your sole method of being
civilized, you'll get destruction. Scientology is the first civilization not
to operate this way. As long as you can get people to talk, so that they can
as-is sin instead of repressing it, you can truly handle the ills of
civilizations. Up to now, repression was the only available method.

Someone could prove that civilization was made possible only by this
mechanism of withholding and making guilty, but only as long as his premise
was that Man is basically evil. You have to process somebody and find they
are nicer people than you thought previously before you can accept the idea
that another basis for civilization is possible. Otherwise you'd think that
if you freed Man, he'd become more evil. If you audit someone and see him
becoming more vital, active, polite, and freer, you don't get the impression
that he's more evil at all.

Where an individual has withdrawn out of earlier groups, he becomes
harder to process in the group called auditor-PC and harder to get along with
in the group called scientology. A failed group member doesn't make a good
group member. This applies to this lifetime; former lives have an effect, but
the force comes from the this-lifetime groups that he has left. You could do
a sec check on each of the groups they had left to get them going into session
more easily. Pay particular attention to this with people who are renegades
from groups which intended to help: doctors, psychiatrists, etc. Run out his
O/W's on that earlier group. You have to be clever to do it, because you have
to find out the mores of the earlier group. So do get all you can on his
former groups, at least as to what he's been in and left.

Only take self-determined changes for the problems intensive processing.
They don't give you anything to handle, e.g. graduation. But, e.g., dropping
out of school you would be interested in. What you want is his solutions to
problems he didn't know he had. Other determined changes aren't his
solutions. You'll get reads on them because they are charged, but they are
not what you want.

[Details on running the process]

Stable datum: If you have to remedy havingness a lot, ruds are out.

Never run a stop. Avoid stills. Unless you've got movement in the
command, the mechanics of the prior confusion will hang you up in the
stillness. If you can get the PC to restate it so it's got action in it,
great. A "preventing" type action is questionable, but it will run, perhaps
slowly, but better than a stop.

[More details on procedure]