6203C27 SHSpec-130 Prepchecking Data

[Details on correction of errors in prepchecking.]

A PC doesn't prepcheck all the way to the bottom of the deck; not all
levels of pcs prepcheck. Prepchecking is not as broadly good an approach to
all cases, no matter how low-toned, as the CCH's or even 3DXX. Both CCH's and
3DXX go much farther south than prepchecking, which requires some
responsibility for thinkingness. Thus:

1. Prepchecking takes responsibility for doingness.

2. 3DXX takes responsibility for existingness (beingness).

3. CCH's take some responsibility for mass and repetitive
action (havingness).

Note that this is a be, do, have situation. 3DXX and CCH's both go further
south than responsibility for doingness, which is what prepchecking attacks.
It is odd that the beingness processes (3DXX) go further south than doingness,
but it is empirically true that this is the case. The reason fur this is
probably that doingness is the main punishment factor in this part of the
universe. One will admit to beingness and havingness before admitting to
doingness.

If you are having a lot of trouble with prepchecking; if you are not
making much gain; if you have tried for several sessions to find an area that
produces TA without success, you should run CCH's. The problem is not
necessarily the PC; it could be lack of auditor skill. But in any case, CCH's
will give the PC more case gain and more auditing. It could be that the
auditor is timid or that the PC is new and the auditor doesn't want to upset
or embarrass him, or the PC may be in the middle of a PTP of long duration
that is undisclosed. The CCH's will discharge PTP's of long duration, even if
they are undisclosed. Or the PC's moral code could be so different from the
auditor's, so far out-of this world, that the auditor misses the boat on it.
Or the PC could have no confidence in the auditor's prepchecking. Or the PC
has insufficient responsibility to respond to any doingness. That will be
handled with CCH's. CCH-2 is less embarrassing to start a new PC with than
prepchecking, also.

After an intensive of CCH's, the same things that didn't produce TA
before will now give TA.

The only thing that breaks an auditor's heart is getting nothing done, so
don't abandon responsibility for yourself by running things which get nothing
done.

Most auditor errors are from not flattening processes. LRH doesn't care
what you run on a PC as long as you flatten it and as long as you get
results. If you are getting TA on something, run it. However, running
limited processes beyond the point where they stop producing TA is a hazardous
operation. Pcs sometimes get off lies and feel relieved. That is just
because you didn't get near their overts.

You should know how to crack the problem of social mores. In 3DXX, you
get the terminal's social mores by asking the PC what would be considered
anti-social by the terminal. You then use the mores to make up zero
questions, using the overt with the biggest meter reaction first. You are
liable to come up with the PC's oppterm and overts of failure to damage the
oppterm pretty quickly. So you have to find out if it is a "plus overt" or a
"minus overt", i.e., whether it is what you would expect or whether it is from
the other side of the fence.

Every race, every species, having a fourth dynamic, tends to fixate on
that dynamic, and the thetans running those bodies tend to keep running those
bodies as long as they are available. But when the species got scarce or
extinct, they had to move over into something else. There is no reason you
shouldn't have been an animal at one time or another. It is actually quite a
relief. You pick up your now-I'm-supposed-to's easily. Animals tend to stay
with their now-I'm-supposed-to's because they can't talk about them. That is
the only thing wrong with [being an animal].

As far as nationalities are concerned, thetan transfer can really
scramble things up. Say some Indian gets a new body as an Englishman; the
U.S. is now getting lots of ex-Nazi's, ex-Japanese, etc. On the track, the PC
has often gone round and round on the Greece-Egypt-Persia line, getting all
confused about his now-I'm-supposed-to's. However, there is a dominant moral
code in the 3DXX package.

Don't forget overts of omission as well as commission, plus the fruitful
area of make-guilty and being a victim. You could investigate the make-guilty
aspect of any zero question to get his efforts to get a motivator on the
subject which would make someone else guilty of the overt.

If the PC tends to dodge into past lives to avoid his this-life overts,
when you get in end-ruds about half-truths, untruths, misses withholds, etc.,
you will pick up the avoided areas. Some pcs need a lot of clean-up on
half-truths all the time; others don't. You will get to know the PC and see
if it is necessary.

Don't use any form of O/W to handle ruds in prepcheck sessions or you
will pile up unflat chains, and the PC will use ruds to avoid uncomfortable
hot areas.