Von Bertalanffy Growth Function
Von Bertalanffy Growth Function (VBGF)
Updated technical summary based on presentation at the June 1995 AES meeting in Edmonton, Canada.
The von Bertalanffy growth function (VBGF) introduced by von Bertalanffy in 1938 predicts the
length of a shark as a function of its age, L = L(t): L(t) = Loo - (Loo - Lo) exp(-kt)
The VBGF has 3
parameters:
1. Lo (Lzero, y-axis
intercept) is the mean
length at birth (t = 0),
2. Loo (L infinity) is the
mean maximum length (t =
infinity),
3. k is a rate constant with
units of reciprocal time (e.
g. year-1).
The graph on the left used
Lo = 0.5 m, Loo = 3 m,
k = 0.13863 year-1
(ln2/k = 5 years,
5 ln2/k = 25 years,
7 ln2/k = 35 years)
The difference between Loo and Lo diminishes ("decays") exponentially. Ln2/k is a half-life i.e. in
this time the shark will be halfway between Lo and Loo. 5ln2/k and 7ln2/k are good longevity
estimates. In this time the shark will have reached 95 and 99%, respectively, of the mean
maximum length Loo.
k has often been called a growth constant. In the demonstration plot below I used 2 pups with the
same length at birth (0.5 m) and weight (0.625 kg). I used the same anabolic constant a (usually
denoted as eta) and 2 different values for k (3k = catabolic constant, usually denoted as chi) and
calculated growth rates vs. age. A large k produces a mature adult shark of low mass (8.64 kg)
which is reached in a short time. This may look like fast growth, however, the corresponding growth
rates (with units of kg/yr or m/yr) are small. With a smaller k of 0.1, the maximum growth rates are
6 x as large and the shark reaches a considerably larger mass (135 kg), but it takes a lot longer to
reach the steady state.
file:///C|/Download/Texto/HTML/Von Bertalanffy Growth Function.htm (1 of 5)9/4/2005 19:13:17
Von Bertalanffy Growth Function
dM/dt = a M^(2/3) - 3k M
1. Mo = 0.625 kg;
2. a = 1.539 kg^0.333 yr-1;
3. k = 0.1 and 0.25 yr-1.
The anabolic constant a
was chosen to produce
Moo = 135 kg with k =
0.1, where 135 kg was the
estimated mass of a shark
of 3 m TL assuming M = 5
TL^3.0.
Miscellaneous items
As outlined above k is not a growth constant but apparently sharks with large growth rates
have large k. k (rate constant) and dL/dt (growth rate) are related as follows:
k = (dL/dt)/(Loo - L)
If "growth" is understood to be the growth rates of pups or juveniles (large adult sharks no
longer grow much) then we can replace L by Lo and now compare two shark of SIMILAR Loo.
Furthermore let's assume that Loo>>Lo, and we have k ~ (dL/dt)/Loo i.e. k is proportional to
dL/dt.
k in the VBGF is assumed to be a constant. However, Von Bertalanffy (1960) indicated that k
could change as a shark get older. Sevengill shark growth data indicated that indeed k is not
constant and becomes smaller as they get older.
The VBGF is a 3 parameter equation. In principle, three data points determine the
parameters. If adult males and females reach different maximum sizes, then the VBGF of
males and females must be different because size at birth and say first year growth of males
and females are the same.
Most statistical packages include a non-liner module which can be used to calculate the best
fitting parameters for the available length age data pairs. Most frequently least-squares are
used but a maximum likelihood loss function may produce more robust parameters.
The VBGF given here first, is the most suitable form for sharks which have a well
defined size at birth. The following theoretical publications and papers dealing with
elasmobranch research used this form:
Aasen, O. 1963. Length and growth of the porbeagle (Lamna nasus, Bonnaterre) in the
North West Atlantic. Rep. Norw. Fishery Mar. Invest. 13: 20-37.
file:///C|/Download/Texto/HTML/Von Bertalanffy Growth Function.htm (2 of 5)9/4/2005 19:13:17
Von Bertalanffy Growth Function
Bertalanffy, L. von 1938. A quantitative theory of organic growth (Inquiries on growth laws.
II). Human Biol. 10: 181-213.
Bertalanffy, L. von 1960. Principles and theory of growth, pp 137-259. In Fundamental
aspects of normal and malignant growth. W. W. Wowinski ed. Elseviers, Amsterdam.
Cailliet, G. M., H. F. Mollet, G. G. Pittenger, D. Bedford, and L. J. Natanson 1992.
Growth and demography of the pacific angel shark (Squatina californica), based upon tag
returns off California. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 43: 1313-30.
Fabens, A. J. 1965. Properties and fitting of the von Bertalanffy growth curve. Growth 29:
265-289.
Van Dykhuizen, G. and H. F. Mollet 1992. Growth, age estimation, and feeding of captive
sevengill sharks, Notorynchus cepedianus, at the Monterey Bay Aquarium. In Sharks: Biology
and Fisheries. J. G. Pepperell ed. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 43:
297-318.
The VBGF is more often presented in a different form which uses to (t zero, x-axis
intercept) as the 3rd parameter rather than Lo (L zero, y-axis intercept).
L(t) = Loo (1 - exp[-k(t-to)])
t zero was assumed to be the gestation time (time from fertilization to birth) by many (e.g.
Holden 1974) but this implies that embryonic growth follows the same growth law governing
post-natal growth. No data was ever produced to substantiate this, wheras available data of
embryonic growth suggests that it is different from post-natal growth and thus requires its
own growth curve. Indeed, it would be surprising if embryonic growth of elasmobranchs
featuring a large number of reproductive modes (ovipaity to placental vivipartiy) would follow/
determine) post-natal growth. Accordingly, t zero has little meaning and I suggest that
it is preferable to use Lo when reporting VBGF's of elasmobranchs. Lo can be
calculated from the parameters Loo, k, and t zero from the following equation Lo = Loo[1 -
exp(kto)]. The example in the graph has to = (1/k)ln[(Loo-Lo)/Loo] = 1.6 years.
The VBGF is sometimes used in yet another form involving as the third parameter b
= (Loo-Lo)/Loo = exp(kto)
L(t) = Loo [1 - b exp(-kt)]
Fabens' 1966 method allows determination of Loo and k
L(recapture) = L(tag) + (Loo - L(tag))(1 - exp(-kT)
where T = time-at-large. The age of the shark is not required.
Growth rate vs. age (explicit age dependence)
L'(t) = dL/dt = k(Loo - Lo) exp(-kt)
file:///C|/Download/Texto/HTML/Von Bertalanffy Growth Function.htm (3 of 5)9/4/2005 19:13:17
Von Bertalanffy Growth Function
Explicit expression of growth rate in units of length/time (e.g. m/year).
Growth rate vs. length (implicit age dependence, Gulland-Holt method)
L'(t) = dL/dt = kLoo - kL = k (Loo - L)
Age not required. Annualized growth rates are plotted vs. mean length at tagging and
recapture. Times-at-large don't have to be equal. If times-at large vary too much, a
correction factor can be used.
Fractional growth rate L'/L = k [(Loo/L) - 1]
Often k is misnamed as a growth constant although k has units of reciprocal time. The
Gulland-Holt equation shows how k and the growth rate are related: k = L'/(Loo - Lo) where
L' = L'(t)
Gulland method, L increment vs. L at tagging
L(increment) = Loo (1 - exp(-kT)
where T = time at large. Should be the same for all the data. Age is not required.
VBGF equations for mass, CRM = cube root mass
CRM(t) = CRMoo - (CRMoo - CRMo) exp(-kt)
M(t) = [CRMoo - (CRMoo - CRMo) exp(-kt)]3
M'(t) = dM/dt = 3k(CRMoo - CRMo) exp(-kt)[...]2
growth rate vs. age
M'(t)/M(t) = 3k(CRMoo - CRMo) exp(-kt)[...]-1
fractional growth rate vs. age, related to food intake vs. age.
Back to previous page
GO
Von Bertalanffy References ElasMollet Home Page
TO
Please send comments, corrections, and updates to mailto:[e-mail] August 1998; revised
file:///C|/Download/Texto/HTML/Von Bertalanffy Growth Function.htm (4 of 5)9/4/2005 19:13:17
Von Bertalanffy Growth Function
August 1998.
file:///C|/Download/Texto/HTML/Von Bertalanffy Growth Function.htm (5 of 5)9/4/2005 19:13:17