Geophysical Technology Limited


ABN 49 072 470 243


Suite 1A Level two 802

Ukraine

Tel [phone]

Email: [e-mail]

Website: www.250.org.ua



B E T T E R B Y D E F I N I T I O N

Specialising in:

�ó explosive ordnance detection





and remediation


�ó minerals exploration

�ó project management

�ó environmental geoscience

�ó engineering geoscience

MAGNETOMETER SYSTEMS

FOR





EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DETECTION ON LAND


John M. Stanley, PhD

Malcolm K. Cattach, PhD

Conventional magnetic locators were analogue instruments. These have now been greatly

outperformed by digital systems. Analogue locators rely on the operator watching a meter and

listening to an audio tone as the sensing probe is systematically scanned across the survey area. These

systems depend heavily on operator concentration and subjective judgements during the search.

Digital magnetometers outperform their analogue predecessors in survey speed and detection

performance. They verify the integrity of the search and enable a detection assurance level to be

quantified.

A R M I D A L E

S U N S H I N E C O A S T

w w w . p r o p r i b o r . o r g . u a

PO Box 2002

Buddina Qld 4575 Australia

Tel [phone]

Fax [phone]





Contents


List of Figures





iii

List of Tables





iii

ABSTRACT





1

THE USE OF MAGNETICS IN ORDNANCE LOCATION





2

REQUIREMENTS OF AN EOD MAGNETOMETER





2

TOW CONVENTIONAL ANALOG MAGNETOMETERS





3



The Ferex 4.021





3



The Varian V92 / Mk 22





5

DIGITAL EOD MAGNETOMETERS





5

RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF CONTEMPORARY MAGNETOMETERS





6

THE TM-4 IMAGE PROCESSIN MAGNETOMETER SYSTEM





10



The Data Acquisition Unit





10



The Transportable Data Processing Unit





12

THE TM-4 OPERATING PROCEDURE





12



The Field Procedure





12



The Data Processing Procedure





13

TM-4 SEARCH ASSURANCE LEVELS





15

CASE EXAMPLES WHRE THE TM-4 MAGNETOMETER WAS USED





17

CONCLUSIONS





18

APPENDIX

Technical Specifications of the TM-4 Magnetometer





23

ii





List of Figures


1.

A typical magnetic profile showing �śsignal' and "noise".





4

2.

Magnetic anomalies intensities over a selection of ordnance devices





7

showing the limit of sensitivity for each EOD magnetometer.

3.

Total field intensity and gradient anomaly amplitudes over a





8

selection of ordnance devices.

4

The TM-4 magnetometer showing the optically pumped magnetic





11



sensor and the data acquisition and control unit.

5.

The TM-4 data acquisition and control unit.





11

6.

An example of It TM-4 search assurance graph for a particular area





16

where the soil type was classified as "sandy" and the magnetic noise was 2.5 nT.

7.

Isoplot images of magnetic anomalies measured with a TM-4





19

magnetometer over a five inch rocket head and four practice bombs, all buried at two metre depth.

8.

An Isoplot of magnetic anomalies measured with a TM-4 over a





20

contaminated World War II artillery range.

9.

An enhanced colour image of a 'contaminated site showing only





21

magnetic anomalies due to UXO.

10.

An Isoplot showing the TM~4 record after: a contaminated area





22

had been cleared.





List of Tables.


1.

Detection limits for: an 81 mm Mortar in conditions of zero magnetic





9

noise and conditions where geological magnetic noise was 10 nT.

2.

Detection limits for a 1000lb HE Bomb in conditions of zero





9

magnetic noise and conditions where geolt,'lgic81 magnetic noise was 10 nT.

3.

An example of an interpretation record with the anomaly "source"





14

entry completed by the field excavation crew.

iii





MAGNETOMETER SYSTEMS


FOR EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DETECTION ON LAND

John M Stanley, PhD

Malcolm K Cattach, PhD





ABSTRACT


The use of magnetometers to detect sub-surface, unexploded ordnance is not new. Conventional magnetic

locators were analogue instruments. These have now been greatly outperformed by digital systems. Analogue

locators depend upon the operator watching a meter listening to an audio tone as the sensing probe is

systematically scanned across the survey area. These systems depend heavily upon operator concentration and

subjective judgements the time of searching. Further more, analogue detectors do not produce a record of the

magnet data from which the effectiveness of the search may be verified.

Digital magnetometers outperform their analogue predecessors in survey speed and detection performance. They

provide verification of the integrity of the search and they enable a detection assurance level to be quantified.

Two distinct types of magnetic sensors are used for detection in Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD). One

measures the gradient of the vertical component of the magnetic field (the difference between two fluxgate type

sensors)- The other type measures the intensity of the total magnetic field. Gradiometers are shown to be much

less sensitive to deeper targets.

A comparison was made between the performance of gradiometer and total field intensity analogue locators

(Forster 4.021 and US Navy's Mk22) and gradiometer and total field intensity, digital recording systems (Forster

CAST and TM-4). Each instrument was compared when used both in areas of high, medium and low levels of

magnetic interference from geological sources. In low noise areas the depth to which a UXO target may be

detected was shown to always be 3 times greater with the TM-4 than with the Mk22, and at least 3.5 times

greater than with the CAST or 4.021 systems. In medium noise areas, the detection depth was 1.5 times greater

with the TM-4 than with the Mk22 and up to 2.5 and 3 times greater than with the CAST and 4.021 systems. In

areas of high noise, the detection depth was up to 2.5 times greater with the TM-4 than with the CAST system

and analogue systems failed completely.

The most sensitive and best performing magnetic EOD system presently available is the model "TM-4"

manufactured by Geophysical Technology Pty. Ltd. This magnetometer system enables both the position and

total magnetic field intensity to be automatically determined. Measurements to 0.01 nT resolution can be

recorded at up to 100 per second. Typically, two hectares (about 4.5 acres) can be surveyed on foot per day, or

up to 25 hectares (ha) using the TM-4 with multi-sensors mounted on a quad cycle All Terrain Vehicle (ATV).

At least foul measurements per square metre ( 40,400 per ha) are recorded. This very high density of data makes

image processing practical and effective. Computer aided interpretation tabulates the position, depth and size of

ferrous items requiring investigation. Assurance depths are defined objectively and quantitatively. The results of

the entire search process are fully documented and are verifiable from the data record.

An example of TM-4 data sets collected before and after the clearance of a contaminated artillery site

demonstrate the effectiveness of the search and verification procedure.

1





THE USE OF MAGNETICS IN ORDNANCE LOCATION

The location of dangerous, unexploded ordnance by the detection of anomalies in the earth's magnetic field is

inherently attractive because the magnetic sensor is totally passive. It can be scanned over a target zone without

emitting radiation capable of causing detonation. However, the magnetic method is only applicable to ordnance

which contains ferromagnetic materials such as iron.

Ferromagnetic materials become magnetic by induction from the earth's magnetic field. Hard iron also retains

remanent magnetization acquired when it was last heated above the Curie temperature of about 650 deg C. The

magnetic field associated with an object is the vector sum of the induced and remanent magnetization.

The magnetic field of a bar shaped body is dipolar, with a north and south magnetic pole. Iron ordnance devices

have a magnetic field which approximates that of a dipole. The intensity of a dipolar magnetic field decreases

with the inverse cube of the distance from the source. The intensity of the vertical magnetic gradient drops off

even faster, as the inverse fourth power of the distance from the source. The magnetic anomaly due to a small

iron object may only be detectable within a small distance. In order to locate a magnetic anomaly, several

measurements must be made within the area of measurable influence. If, for example, the magnetic detector is

operated half a metre above ground, then a minimum sample density of four uniformly spaced measurements per

square metre is required.

Magnetic anomalies in the earth's magnetic field can also arise from variation in the chemistry of the rocks and

soil from one position to another. Even at any one place, the Earth's field is forever changing by a small amount

with time due to natural causes and it may also change as a result of electromagnetic interference from mains

electricity. Anomalies due to changes in the ground geology or due to temporal sources can be referred to as

"magnetic noise" in the context of ordnance location.

Magnetic anomalies may be located by mapping the total magnetic field intensity, a component of this field or

by measuring the difference (gradient) between two total field or component sensors. The earliest magnetometers

could only measure a single component of the magnetic field. Modern atomic devices enable the total field

intensity to be measured with extreme precision.





REQUIREMENTS OF AN EOD MAGNETOMETER.


There are three fundamental requirements for a magnetometer to be suitable for verifiable ordnance clearance

operations. The device must be sufficiently sensitive to resolve the target anomaly, it must be capable of very

rapid measurement of both magnetic field and sensor position and it must automatically record the data

measured.

The analogue magnetometers used in the past for ordnance location do not meet these requirements and their

sole use for area clearance during peacetime could be deemed negligent in court. Analogue locators produce an

output which may be a meter deflection, an audible tone or both. The output varies with a change in the magnetic

intensity or its gradient. The tone may be continuously present, or it may be activated only when a preset

anomaly amplitude or rate of change is exceeded. As data is not recorded with these detectors, the target signal

must be recognized at the time of the survey. It must be assumed that the operator is diligent.

2





and that the equipment is performing properly. A target signal can only be recognised if it significantly exceeds

the background magnetic noise level characteristic of the sit. There is a high dependence upon the concentration

and subjective judgements of the operator who may be working under adverse conditions. On completion of the

search, the only record that the search was performed effectively is the word of the operator.

Digital recording magnetometers avoid the above problems. To make efficient use of digital data, both the value

of the measurement and its position must be automatically recorded. While high resolution digital

magnetometers have been available since the mid 1960’s, the positioning and recording time of at least several

seconds per measurement has excluded their use in high definition surveying except where very small areas were

to be examined. Digital data in large quantities require automatic digital processing, preferably onsite. High

speed data acquisition and on-site data processing are essential to the efficiency of verifiable magnetic EOD

operations.

It is only since the development of automatic resonance type magnetic detectors and digital microelectronic that

an efficient, digital magnetometer system suitable for ordnance detection could be built.

Before describing and comparing existing magnetic locating devices, consider a typical profile of magnetic field

variations 0.5 m above the ground (Figure 1 ). The magnetic "noise" on this profile can be defined as those

variations which are not of interest. They may be due to geological or temporal sources. In this example, the

noise envelope has an amplitude of about 20 nanoTeslas (uT). The "signal" can be defined as the magnetic

anomaly due to the target of interest that is to be located. In the profile shown, the signal amplitude is 100 nT.

The "signal-to-noise" ratio of this data is therefore five. The objective of the magnetic search is to locate and

identify the "signal" from within the "noise", preferably even when the signal-to-noise ratio is small.





TWO CONVENTIONAL ANALOG MAGNETOMETERS.


The two work-horses of magnetic EOD during the last 20 years have been the Foerster "Ferex" and the Varian

"V92" (known to the US Navy as the "Mk22"). The detection limitations of these instrument types can be

described in tennis of signal detection capability as follows:





The FEREX 4.021.


The Ferex locator consists of a pair of fluxgate type sensors mounted 400 mm apart, in-line. When operated

vertically, it measures the difference in the vertical component of the magnetic field between the sensors. For

source depths greater than about 2 m, this difference approximates the vertical gradient of the vertical component

of the anomaly. A switch enables a sensitivity to be selected from a ran~ between 3 nT and 10.000 nT. The

choice of sensitivity setting that can be used is determined by the amplitude of the noise envelope in the area of

the search.

The magnetometer output is provided by an audio tone and an analogue meter. The tone is emitted only when the

magnetic field exceeds a threshold which is 20% of full scale range. The frequency of the tone increases the

further this threshold is exceeded. The meter displays the magnetic intensity and its polarity.

3





In the locality of Figure 1, the operator would have chosen the 100 uT sensitivity range. The acoustic alarm

would sound when the magnetic field exceeded 20 nT.

Thus the "noise" of the 10 nT about the mean would have been rejected by the instrument while the "signal"

would have triggered the audio alarm.

As a gradiometer, both fluxgate sensors in the Ferex probe respond equally and simultaneously to temporal

changes in the magnetic field. Hence, this source of noise is automatically eliminated.

The limitation of the Ferex is reached when the signal-to-noise ratio drops below about two.

Figure 1. A typical magnetic profile showing a "signal" anomaly due to an item of UXO, and magnetic noise of

geological, geomagnetic or electromagnetic origin.

4





The Varian V92 / Mk22.

This Magnetometer was developed by Varian Associates and is now manufactured by Scintrex in Canada and

Geometrics in the USA. It is also known in the US Navy as the Mk22 locator. The sensor probe is of the atomic

resonance type (optically pumped caesium) and it measures the total magnetic field intensity. A digital display is

provided with a resolution of 1nT. However as it is impractical to conduct a UXO search by mentally registering

changes in the digital display, the instrument had been designed to emit a continuous tone of which the

frequency changes by fixed 7 Hz per nT. It is therefore used as an analogue instrument in this application. A

good ear may resolve a change of 15 or 20 Hz and therefore can detect a magnetic field change of 2 or 3 nT.

However �śsignal” can only be recognised audibly if it exceeds the noise envelope by a factor of at least three. A

high dependence upon operator concentration is a major disadvantage of this unit. In areas where there is

appreciable geological magnetic interference, the audio tone becomes incomprehensible because the tone

sensitivity is fixed.

Note: Neither the Ferex 4.021 nor the Varian V92 record data. Consequently, there is no way of demonstrating

that the search was effective, and there is no record that would facilitate a second opinion or withstand a legal

challenge





DIGITAL EOD MAGNETOMETER


As with the analogue locators, digital EOD magnetometer may be of the total field intensity type or they may be

vertical component gradiometers.

The inherent limitation of gradiometer type of instruments is the fact that the gradient anomaly over an item of

UXO attenuates more rapidly with depth below the sensor than does the total intensity anomaly. Therefore the

detection depth for a given size of object is always less for this type of instrument than for a total field intensity

magnetometer.

The Forster CAST system consists of a Ferex 4.021 gradiometer to which has been added a digital recording

option. Apart from the fundamental limitation of detection depth, the absence of an in-built odometer in the

CAST system severely impedes the survey coverage rate and the integrity of data collected in rough terrain.

The TM-4 is a total field intensity magnetometer. It has applied the latest technology to best solve the logistical

problems associated with EOD. Its performance has been compared directly with the other magnetometer

systems previously discussed.

5





RELATIVE PERFORMANCE OF CONTEMPORARY


MAGNETOMETERS.

In defining the performance of a magnetic technique for locating sub-surface ferromagnetic objects, the

important parameter to consider is the depth to which an object of a given size can be confidently detected, or the

minimum size of object that can be detected to a given depth. These parameters are related and are a function of

the resolution of the magnetometer, the intensity of magnetic noise, the spacing between adjacent passes of the

magnetic sensor and, in the case of non-recording detectors, the performance of the operator.

The measurement of the magnetic properties of a very large number of ordnance items has enabled a quantitative

measure to be made of the depth to which they can be detected using each of the magnetometer systems. The

same data also enables the detection depth to be defined for any given amplitude of magnetic interference.

The anomalous magnetic field form an ordnance device is dipolar. The amplitude of this anomaly is known to

attenuate as the inverse cube of the distance from the device. Therefore, a plot of the cube root of the reciprocal

of the measured total magnetic field anomaly against the distance from the target is a straight-line graph. The

slope of the graph is dependent upon the size and intensity of magnetization of the magnetic source. In Figure 2,

data from a sample of ordnance devices has been plotted. The exact slope of each line varies a little with the

composition of the steel used in manufacture, the time that the device has been in a static limit of detection,

determined only by the sensitivity of each of the four magnetic locator types being considered. In the case of the

Forster 4.021 and CAST instruments, the limit of detection is a curved line due to the more rapid decrease in

anomaly amplitude with depth associated with the magnetic difference (or gradient). We can determine from this

graph what is the maximum depth to which the given target may be detected with each of the instruments.

Consider first the performance of each magnetometer in an ideal geological environment where the magnetic

noise is zero. With reference to the limits of detection in Figure 3, the 81 mm Mortar for example can be

detected to a depth of about 2.3 m with the Forster Ferex 4.021 and CASE, 3.0 m with the Varian V 95 / Mk 22

and 9.8 m with the TM-4. These figures show the relative resolution of each instrument but they do not

necessarily reflect the practical detection depths because the assumption of zero magnetic noise is never

justified.

Consider now the effect of geological noise. It is the signal-to-noise ratio that will determine the depth to which

a target object may be detected in practice. It had been determined that for effective operation the Ferex 4.021

gradiometer required a signal-to-noise ratio greater that about 2 and that the V 92 / Mk 22 required a ratio greater

than 3. With the advantages of image processing, the digital systems required a signal-to-noise greater than 1 (in

cases where the noise source is shallow, deep signals may be detected even when the signal-to-noise ratio is less

than 1). With these values we can determine the signal amplitude that will be required, given a particular value

of the noise amplitude characteristic of the area being searched. For example if the near surface noises amplitude

is 10nT then the V 92 / Mk 22 requires a signal greater than 30nT, the Ferex 4.021 requires a signal amplitude

greater than 20nT while the CAST and TM-4 requires a signal greater than 10nT. With reference to Figure 3, we

can use these signal anomaly values to determine the practical depth of detection for this given noise situation. In

the case of the 1000 lb bomb, detection to a depth of 4.0 m would be expected with the Ferex 4.021, 4.7 m with

the CAST, 5.6 m using the V 92 / Mk 22 and 8.0 m with the TM-4

6





Figure 2. A plot of magnetic field intensity as a function of depth below the sensor for a selection of ordnance devices Also

indicated are the maximum sensitivities of four magnetic detector induments. The stippled area highlights those ordnance

items, which could be detected by the TM-4 under ideal geological conditions, by which could not be detect3d by the Forster

CAST system.

7





Figure 3. Total magnetic intensity and gradient anomaly amplitudes plotted as a function of depth below the sensor for a

selection of ordnance devises. The normal, horizontal grid lines refer to total field amplitudes as measured by the

TM-4 and Mk 22 magnetometers. The curved lines refer to the gradient anomaly amplitudes as measured by the

Forster 4.021 and CAST gradiometers.

8





These latter figures for comparing the four instruments are realistic given the practical conditions encountered in

the field. Although the sensitivity of the V 92 / Mk 22 and the Ferex 4.021 is similar, the Ferex is better able to

tolerate magnetic noise. (A signal-to-noise ratio better than 3 is required for effective use of the V 92 / Mk 22

whereas a ratio of only 2 is required by the Ferex 4.021). This would suggest that the Ferex would out-perform

the V 92 /Mk 22 but this is not always the case. Only for very shallow and small objects is the superior noise

tolerance of the Ferex significant. Because the gradient anomaly decreased more rapidly with depth than the total

field anomaly (the curved lines on Figure 3 compared with the horizontal lines), the V 92 /Mk 22 in fact

performs better than the Ferex whenever the target is deeper than about one meter below the sensor.

Although the much higher absolute sensitivity of the TM-4 cannot always be used in the presence of noise, the

depth to which a target may be detected with the TM-4 must always be more than 1.5 times greater than when

using an analogue system, and it may be several times more after the use of digital signal enhancement. By

virtue of the characteristics of gradient and total intensity anomalies in geologically noisy locations, the TM-4

and CAST will detect equally small object only a �śzero” depth. However, by 5 meters depth, the TM-4 will be

able to locate an object that is only half the size that could be located with the CAST in the same noise situation.

TABLE 1.

Detection Limits for an 81 mm Mortar in Conditions of Zero Magnetic Noise

and 10nT Magnetic Noise.

INSTRUMENT

ZERO NOISE





10 nT NOISE


Ferex 4.021

2.3 m

1.1 m

Forster CAST

2.3 m

1.3 m

V 92 / Mk 22

3.0 m

1.4 m

TM-4

9.8 m

2.1 m

TABLE 2.

Detection Limits for a 1000 lb HE Bomb in Conditions of Zero Magnetic Noise

And 10nT Magnetic Noise

INSTRUMENT

ZERO NOISE





10nT NOISE


Ferex 4.021

6.2 m

4.0 m

Forster CAST

6.2 m

4.7 m

V 92 / Mk 22

11.0 m

5.6 m

TM-4

40.0 m

8.0 m

9





THE TM-4 IMAGE PROCESSING MAGNETOMETER SYSTEM.

The proceeding data has demonstrated the TM-4 magnetometer to be the best performing magnetic EOD system

presently available. The TM-4 is not just a magnetometer, but a complete data acquisition, processing,

interpretation and documentation system.

The great advantages of the TM-4 system over contemporary ordnance locating magnetometers are that it

measures the total magnetic intensity and not just its gradient, it has a higher sensitivity and resolution, it

achieves this resolution in the very short measurement time of only 2.5 milliseconds per measurement, and most

importantly, it automatically records digital data including the position of each magnetic field measurement.

During its development, approximately 40,000 line kilometres of data sampled at 0.25 m intervals were recorded

and processed. This considerable quantity of data was recorded in a diverse range of geological environments

and in temperatures ranging from sub-zero to nearly 50 deg C. From this data-base the requirements of signal

processing software have been extensively researched and a comprehensive software package applicable to

magnetic UXO identification and interpretation had been developed.

The combination of high resolution, very fast digital measurement rate and automatic position determination has

made very high definition magnetic surveys efficient and economically viable.

The TM-4 package consists of two units, one of which is used for data acquisition and the other for data

processing. Each unit is packaged in robust, light, alloy clad transit case for convenient and secure transport into

field locations.





The Data Acquisition Unit


The data acquisition unit may be either hand-carried or operated from a quad cycle ATV. The main components

for hand-held operation of this unit are:

�ó

An optically pumped, atomic resonance type magnetic sensor, with a sensitivity of 0.005nT.

�ó

Magnetometer electronics capable of recording the magnetic field values to a resolution of 0.01nT at a

rate of up to 100 per second, or to 0.1nT, 400 per second.

�ó

A DGPS is routinely used for positioning and navigation control. The type, either Standard (Mapping)

or Real Time Kinematic (Geodetic), is chosen according to the anticipated target size and therefore the

level of accuracy required.

�ó

An odometer, which measures the distance traversed by the sensor and which electronically initiates

each magnetic field measurement at programmable distance increments.

�ó

A combination of the DGPS and odometer control systems can be used in areas where satellite coverage

is problematic such as thick canopies in wooded areas and inside buildings.

�ó

Solid-state memory with the capacity to record survey line header information, operator comments and

up to 100,000 measurements.

�ó

Multi-tasking operating system software to control and monitor data acquisition. Additional functions

include: display of the magnetic field profile as it is being recorded, generation of an audio tone at

selectable frequency ranges, digital filtering of interference from mains electricity and a facility for

recording notes during a survey.

10





Figure 4.

The TM-4 Magnetometer showing the optically pumped magnetic field sensor and the data

acquisition control unit.





Figure 5.


The TM-4 data acquisition unit showing the in-built odometer

11





If the TM-4 is to be operated from a quad cycle ATV, then the following optional accessories are available:

�ó Additional magnetic sensors for multiple sensor operation.

�ó A tri-axial fluxgate compensator for heading, pitch and roll corrections.

�ó Receivers and expansion RAM for differential GPS positioning.

The Transportable Data Processing Unit

The unit typically consists of:

�ó A high performance, 32 bit laptop computer with colour monitor

�ó

A3 size �śPaintJet XL300” colour printer with HPGL vector plotting emulation.

�ó

Comprehensive data processing software package for data validation, filtering, griding, contouring,

profile plotting, isometric presentation, colour image processing, interactive computer-aided

interpretation and search documentation.

�ó A spreadsheet data base for storing data and interpretation statistics

THE TM-4 OPERATING PROCEDURE





The Field Procedure


The usual field procedure for hand-held ordnance location is first to peg the corners of the block to be surveyed.

For convenience these blocks should be about one hectare in area, and should be square or rectangular. If part of

such an area is not accessible, then the area may be a polygon. The local, or map grid coordinates of the corners

of the block are entered through the keypad of the magnetometer. Next, the line spacing and chosen sample

interval (usually 1 m and 0.25 m but closer line spacing may be required if very small items are to be located)

and the starting point of the survey (usually one of the corners) are entered.

Data may be automatically recorded at eh prescribed interval while walking at any convenient speed along

straight-line traverses. The sensor is usually held 0.5 m above ground, or 0.25 m if the location of very small

items is of concern. Constant speed is not required. The coordinates of the start and end points of each survey

line are automatically determined from the coordinates of the survey block. Intermediate coordinates, if known,

may also be manually entered if increased positional accuracy is desired. By walking to and fro along successive

grid lines at the prescribed spacing, an area may be covered quickly. While conducting the search, the operator

may inspect the current magnetic profile as it is plotted to the magnetometer screen. The audio monitor also

alerts the operator of the presence of magnetic objects.

12





While conducting the survey the operator may note objects or features on the ground surface that influence the

measurements. The position of these may be automatically recorded in the data file by keying in an appropriate

note as the object is passed. Noteworthy objects may be scraps of iron, fences, creeks and gullies, etc.

Surveys conducted in this manner have regularly been performed at a rate of one hectare in less than three hours.

A quad cycle mounted, multi sensor TM-4 system without GPS positioning is suited to situations where the

terrain is reasonably flat and cleared of scrub and trees. The survey procedure requires the system to be operated

along a regular grid pattern of straight lanes with position control at no greater then 500 m intervals.

Differential GPS positioning is available for the quad cycle mounted system. This obviates the need for straight

line surveying and position control points. With GPS, the system is ideal for searching long strips such as

roadways, cable or pipe trench easements etc. Traverse speed is only limited by the ability of the ATV to

negotiate the terrain.





The Processing Procedure


On completion of recording a block of data (one hectare should take between 2.5 and 3 hours on foot) or a day’s

traversing over a larger grid, the data acquisition unit is connected to the field computer processing system.

Transfer of the data to the computer takes a few minutes. The operator has access to a menu of data processing

options from a �śWindows” environment. These include a choice of image processing and signal enhancement

filters applicable to different geological situations and the desired output presentation. Also selected are the

plotting scales, the orientation of the view of the data and information that is required to be printed with the plot

to identify the survey area and filters used. A default menu may be specified for a particular location so that all

the data from that area are processed identically.

The processed magnetic data may be represented in several output forms. The most useful of these are colour

maps, isometric images and contour maps.

Interpretation of the magnetic data in terms of potential UXO targets has been semi automated and can be

performed by operators who have not been trained in magnetic field theory. All of the interpretation can be

conducted interactively on the computer screen images.

A most important aspect of an EOD search and clearance operation is the ability to be able to specify the

confidence level with which an assurance can be given that a search has been effective. The interpretation

software automatically defines the assurance levels appropriate to each area searched.

The computer-aided ordnance detection and interpretation software computes the position, and approximate size

and depth of all anomaly sources recognised as requiring excavation. This information is tabulated leaving a

blank column to record the actual items recovered upon excavation. An example of a completed interpretation

form is given as Table 3.

13





TM-4 MAGNETIC ORDNANCE DETECTION

SURVEY INTERPRETATION





AND EXCAVATION RECORD


INTERPRETER: JMS JOB NO: 9056 PAGE: 1 OF 1

DATE: 10.04.90 GRID ID: J42

SENSOR ELEVATION: 0.5 M NOISE THRESHOLD: 2.5 nT

COORDINATES

MASS

DEPTH





SOURCE CONFIRMED


E (m) N(m)

Kg





M


1.5

68.5

0.2

0.6

FRAG

2.7

3.6

0.2

0.8

3 INCH MORTAR TAIL

3.2

7.8

5.0

0.8

STEEL FENCE POST

3.8

24.8

15

0.6

25LB SMOKE SHELL

5.7

80.0

0.4

0.7

VEHICLE TOW BALL

8.4

72.5

180

3.8

500LB HE BOMB

9.2

90.6

60

2.3

5 INCH ROCKET HEAD

11.4

12.7

5.0

0.7

ANTITANK PROJ. (INERT)

12.7

18.5

15

0.9

ROCKET MOTOR (INERT)

14.6

73.2

0.1

0.6

37 MM HE SHELL

17.5

35.4

0.2

0.5

FRAG

18.0

70.3

0.1

0.5

DRINK CAN

19.2

5.2

5.0

1.8

81 MM MORTAR

21.5

63.5

2.5

1.2

5 LB SOLID

23.0

87.4

0.2

0.8

37 MM SOLID

Table 3. An example of an interpretation record with the anomaly �śsource” column completed by the field

excavation crew. Note that the �śdepth” measurement refers to the depth below the magnetic sensor,

which in this search was 0.5 m above the ground.

14





SEARCH ASSURANCE LEVELS


It is improbable that anyone would claim that their magnetic explosive ordnance disposal program has been

100% effective. Rarely would it be possible to support such a claim. However, it is possible to define a magnetic

search procedure, which is 100% effective in detecting all UXO down to a quantifiable depth below ground.

The depth to which a magnetic search can be considered 100% effective is a function of many variables

associated with both the ordnance to be detected and the environment where it is buried. In particular, the type

and orientation of the ordnance and the time it has been in the ground, each affect the characteristics of the

magnetic anomaly to be located. The magnetic properties even vary from unit to unit as the composition and

manufacturing history of each is no identical. The ability to locate magnetic ordnance is also determined by the

intensity of magnetic interference from cultural sources, the magnetic properties of the ground, the sensitivity of

the magnetometer, the interval at which magnetic measurements are made and the elevation of the magnetic

sensor above ground.

The magnetic properties of ordnance items have been the subject of exhaustive analysis by the authors. As a

result, the complicated relationship between all the search variables has now been quantified. The level of

magnetic interference characteristic to each search locality and the size of the smallest UXO required to be

located at the site, determine the required survey parameters of sensor elevation, acceptable elevation tolerance,

sample interval, traverse line spacing and acceptable line spacing tolerance. It is essential that these parameters

be determined prior to conducting a search, and that they be strictly adhered to if the search effectiveness is to be

quantified.

The TM-4 UXO detection software is unique in that it has been designed with knowledge of the relationships

between each of the magnetic UXO detection variables. A simple analysis of reconnaissance data determines the

required survey parameters. The analysis of data collected to this specification is then interactive and semi-

automatic. The complicated relationships are reduced to a simple graph showing the depth limits to which a

given UXO object can be detected at the locality searched. The most important depth is that to which the

magnetic search was capable of detecting 100% of buried ordnance. The (greater) depths to which less than

100% of buried objects can be detected can also be defined.

The analysis of the data from each area searched results in a list of targets to be investigated as potential UXO

contamination (as in Table 3) and a graph (as figure 6) showing the depth to which the location can be expected

to be 100% effective in that area.

Figure 6 contains an example of a TM-4 assurance graph for a search area where the magnetic noise threshold

was 2.5 nT. The graph plots the �Śmode’ value of the magnetic anomaly distribution associated with each item

type. The graph also shows the noise level and the 100% detection confidence level appropriate to the particular

locality, sample interval and line spacing.

15





Figure 6.

An example of TM-4 assurance graph for a particular search area where the should type was classified as

�śsandy” and where the magnetic noise threshold was determined to be 2.5 nT. The graph plots the �Śmode’

value of the magnetic anomaly distribution associated with each item as a function of depth directly

below the magnetic sensor. The graph also shows the cut-off line at which there is 100% confidence that

all UXO can be located at this site with the sample interval of UXO types and depths that can be detected

magnetically in that area. The figure also shows the approximate expected maximum penetration depths

for UXO impacting into sandy soul. (Penetration depths adopted from US Army TM-5-855-5,

�śFundamentals of Protective Design for Conventional Weapons”, P35)

16





CASE EXAMPLES WHERE THE TM-4 MAGNETOMETER WAS USED

Figure 7 shows an isometric image, (isoplot) of the magnetic field recorded with a TM-4 magnetometer, over an

area where five items of ordnance were buried at a depth of 2 m. A 5 inch rocket head oriented north-south, and

BDU 33 practice bombs, two oriented north-south, on east-west one and vertical, were located within this survey

area. The characteristic dipolar nature of these magnetic anomalies is evident from the isoplot.

Figure 8 shows an isoplot from a half-hectare area within a World War II artillery range. The area was obviously

heavily contaminated. A very large number of dipolar anomalies of different amplitudes and sizes are evident.

Near the centre of the area is large, complex anomaly that was due to an old, rusted car body.

Figure 9 shows a colour picture of this same area after image processing the data. The computer aided

interpretation software has computed the geological noise level encountered at this locality. All magnetic field

variations with in this noise range have been presented as blue. The anomalies due to potentially hazardous

ferrous objects are highlighted in colour with red being high field values and blue being low field values. With a

picture such as this on the computer monitor, the operator simply �śclicks’ the mouse on each target to be

excavated. Automatically the coordinates, depth and size of the target are tabulated in a spreadsheet file. The

noise rang allows the assurance depth appropriate to the area to be automatically determined for a selection of

ordnance items.

In the particular half hectare are mapped in Figures 6 and7, a digging team, using the interpretation table and

magnetic field images for guidance, unearthed a harvest of almost two hundred pieces of scrap steel. These

included over fifty items of ordnance, which had been fired into the area as part of wartime activates.

The increased sensitivity of the TM-4 imaging magnetometer system permits the detection of ordnance items at

depths that are often greater than that at which they could be expected to penetrate. By providing a permanent

record of the instrument’s output, the system no longer requires the judgement of a single human operator as to

whether an anomaly needs to be investigated by excavation.

An additional benefit offered by the TM-4 magnetometer is its ability to produce a final record upon the

completion of the search and recovery process. Figure 10 shows the same area as above after the scrap and

ordnance had been excavated and removed. The remaining area of contamination near the centre of the plot

contains only rust and scale flakes resulting from the decay of the car body, which had been dumped on the site

some years previously. In normal operations, the removal of the affected soil would eliminate this anomaly.

It is readily apparent that all other anomalies likely to result form the presence of UXO have been removed. The

assurance that the area is free of UXO contamination is therefore a confident one, based as it is on verifiable,

documented evidence. By employing the most sensitive and capable system available in the world today, the

land can then by safely put to a wide variety of uses.

17





CONCLUSIONS


�ó

Because the analogue magnetometers used in the past for ordnance location do not record data, there is

no way of demonstrating that the search was effective or diligently performed. The use of these

locators in peacetime could be deemed negligent in court

�ó

Vertical difference or gradiometer type locators are inherently less sensitive to anomalies from buried

UXO than are total field intensity instruments.

�ó

In areas of very low geological magnetic noise, the depth to which a given target may be detected with

a TM-4 is about 5 times greater than that using an analogue system, and up to 3.5 times greater than

when using the CAST system.

�ó

In magnetically noisy areas, the depth to which a target may be detected with a TM-4 must always be

more than 1.5 times greater than when using an analogue system, and it may be several times more by

virtue of the use of digital signal enhancement. The detection depth using the TM-4 is up to 2.5 times

greater than that when using the CAST system in these conditions.

�ó

In all noise situations, the depth to which exploration for a given size of target has been effective, can

only be quantitatively defined from digital data.

�ó

The TM-4 coverage rate of four hectares per day on foot (and very much more where vehicle access

permits) is serval times greater than can be achieved with either the CAST or analogue systems.

�ó

Computer aided interpretation of image processed; digital data can take place in a favourable

environment and involve input from the experience of more than one operator. In other words, the

interpretation is not dependent upon the concentration of a single field operator who may be working

under adverse conditions.

�ó

A permanent, digital record of the search data (before and after clearance if required) provides

verification of the thoroughness and effectiveness of the search.

�ó

The confidence level at which UXO can be considered all to have been detected and removed can be

specified. The search depth to which such confidence applies varies with projectile size and local

geological conditions but in each search area the assurance level can be quantitatively defined by way

of a single graph.

18





Figure 7.

An isoplot image of magnetic anomalies measured with a TM-4 magnetometer over a five inch rocket

head (largest anomaly) and four BDU-33 practice bombs buried at two metres depth. One BDU-33 was

oriented N-S, one E-W and tow were vertical.

19





Figure 8


An Isoplot of magnetic anomalies measured with a TM-4 magnetometer over a contaminated World War

II artillery range

20





Figure 9.




A colour representation of the area within a World War II artillery range shown at





Figure 8 after image processing the data

21





Figure 10. An Isoplot showing a TM-4 record after a contaminated area had been cleared. The only anomalies remaining

were confirmed to be due to residual rust flakes shed from a car body dumped on the site many years ago.

Modern analog magnetometer "anomaly"

Ukrainian magnetometer is not inferior to Western counterparts - a pedestrian magnetometer "anomaly" is a precision

magnetic field and measuring devices such as portable and designed to measure the absolute value of the Earth's

magnetic field. The main application area - high-performance terrestrial magnitorazvedochnyh work, carrying

out pedestrian ground magnetic survey, the search of magnetic anomalies (with the possibility of accumulation

of the results for further processing on the computer), including in difficult climatic conditions.

Search features:

Car (1 ton) of 10 m.

Ship (1000 tons) 30 m.

Pistol 1 m.

Tube (30 cm) 6 pm

http://250.org.ua/news.php?extend.51

http://propribor.org.ua/shop/UID_333.html