Are Universal Statements Falsifiable? A Critique of Popper's Falsifiability Criterion
Author(s): Lansana Keita
Reviewed work(s):
Source: Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie / Journal for General Philosophy of
Science, Vol. 20, No. 2 (1989), pp. 351-366
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25170856 .
Accessed: 04/12/2011 08:06
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Zeitschrift für allgemeine
Wissenschaftstheorie / Journal for General Philosophy of Science.
http://www.jstor.org
Wyszukiwarka
Podobne podstrony:
Zizek Critique of DeleuzeKellner Douglas Nietzsche s Critique Of Mass CultureCritique of the Image Derrida and StieglerLewis Shiner Nine Hard Qiuestions about the Nature of the UniversePopper Two Autonomous Axiom Systems for the Calculus of Probabilities2009 2010 Statement of Profit and LossCurtis, Are Methodologies Theories of Scientific Rationality1 THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GDAŃSKElegant Universe 1 of 3Anioły Wszechswiata Englar alheimsins Angels of the Universe Angels of the UniverseNapoleon Hill The 17 Universal Principles of Success and AchievementElegant Universe 3 of 3dokument United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948więcej podobnych podstron