027

027



CHAPTER 3

PANTHERII

Already in 1942 there was concern that the Panther did not have sufficient armor for protection against the anti-tank weapons that woutd be encountered on the East-ern Front in 1943. Attempts to fasten additional armor plates onto the current Panther design presented extraordinary tech-nical difficulties. Therefore. a new Panther design was pro-posed with thicker armor. This design was initially referred to as the Panther 2 and after April 1943 as the Panther II. Dur-ing a conference with Speer on 3 January 1943, Hitler agreed to the proposal that the Panther was to be converted to a new model with single piece 100 mm frontal and 60 mm side armor. In the interim, until the Panther with thicker armor was produced. the current model was to be sent into action.

3.1 DEVELOPMENT

A report dated 22 January 1943, revealed that at this early conceptual design stage, the Panther 2 only differed from the Panther 1 in armor thickness and the associated weighi increase. In all of other specifications, the two Panther mod-els were still identical.

Panther 1

Panther 2

Armament:

7.5 cm Kw.K.42 L/70

7.5 cm Kw.K.42 1770

2 M.G.34 and 1 MP

2 M.G.34 and 1 MP

Ammunition:

Armor:

80 rounds

80 rounds

Hull front

80 mm @ 55°

100 mm @ 55°

Hull sides

40 mm @ 0 to 35c

60 mm @ 0 to 358

Belly

30fore, 16 aft

30 fore, 16 aft

Turret front

80 mm @ 12°

100 mm @ 12s

Turret sides Automotive:

45 mm @ 25°

60 mm @ 25°

Motor

HL 210 or 230

HL 210 or 230

Transmission

ZF-AK 7/200

ZF-AK 7/200

Steering

MAN single radius

MAN single radius

Speed

55 km/hr maximum

55 km/hr maximum

30-40 km/hr road

30-40 km/hr road

Fuel

700 liters

700 liters

Rangę

146-240 km

146-240 km

Combat weight:

Approx. 40 metric tons

Approx. 47 metric tons

CHAPTER 3: PANTHER M

At a meeting in Nuernberg on 10 February 1943, Dr. Wiebecke (chief design engineer for M.A.N.) stated that the current Panther design did not meet specifications derived from Eastern Front experience. The Panther was to be thor-oughly redesigned and incorporate components from the Ti-ger mcluding. among others, the steering gears, the finał dnves. etc. The entire suspension and turret would also be modified. The new vehicle would be designated as the Panther 2 The weight of the completed vehicle would increase from 35 metric tons for the Panther 1, to morę than 50 metric tons for the Panther 2 The drawings from M.A.N were to be provided to the assembly firms in April-May 1943. When pos-sible. further modifications to the Panther 1 were to be avoided so that efforts could be concentrated on completion of the Panther 2 design.

On 17 February 1943, during a meeting at Speer’s Reichsmimsterium. it was agreed that the Tlger 3 (later re-designated as the Tiger II) should be standardized with the Panther 2 Porsche believed that the Elnradlenlenkgetrlebe single-radius steering gear would be satisfactory. The Zweiradien-Lenkgetriebe double-radius steering gear was to be installed. if reports from Direktor Blaicher confirmed that it was ready for mass production. Both the Tiger and Panther were to receive the Zahnradfabrlk Frledrlchshafen AK 7/ 200 transmission, the Maybach HL 230 Motor with cooling system and steel-tyred, rubber cushioned roadwheels. The Panther 2 was to have seven roadwheels and the Tiger 3 mne roadwheels, but each with different suspension arm6. The 660 mm wide combat tracks for the Panther 2 were to be utilized as transport tracks for the Tiger 3.

At a meeting on 18 February 1943, between Wa Pruef 6 and Rhemmetall. further design details for the Panther 2 turret were discussed. It was determined that the largest turning radius for the turret was not to exceed 1570 mm. By trimming off the corners. the largest radius could be reduced to 1565 mm. so that a gap of 15 to 20 mm would still be mamtained between the traversing turret and the driver's or radio operator’s hatches. To aJlow clearance to open the motor hatch on the rear deck, the distance from the middle of the turret to the turret rear wali could not exceed 1240 mm. This restric* tion was to be satisfied by changing the angle of the rear turret wali to 20° instead of the previous specification for 25°.

Drawing numbers in the rangę of 021 Gr 50201 through 021 Gr 50248 were used for the Panther II chassis designed by M A N. Gummfsparende Laufrollen, Drawing No. 021 D 50204 (steel-tyred, rubber-cushioned roadwheels) designed for the Panther II were mounted not only on the Panther II and a limited experimental series of Panther Ausf.G, but also on the Tiger II and starting with Fgst.Nr.250822 on the Tiger I.

A Wa Pruef 6 report dated 1 November 1943 reveals the armor thickness and angle of the Panther II in comparison to the Panther I Ausf.D:

Panther II

Turret Roof (fore)

30 mm *

Turret Roof (aft)

30 mm *

Gun Mantlet

150 mm*

Turret Front

120 mm *

Hull Roof

30 mm @ 90°

Glacis Platę

100 mm @55’

Front Lower Hull

60 mm @ 55°

Belly (fore)

30 mm @ 90°

Belly (aft)

16 mm @ 90°

Turret Side

60 mm @ 25°

Pannier Side

60 mm @ 40°

Hull Side

60 mm @ 0°

Turret Rear

60 mm *

Hull Rear

40 mm @ 30°


Panther I Ausf.D


16 mm @ 84.5 16 mm @ 90° 100 mm curved 100 mm @ 12° 16 mm @ 90° 80 mm @ 55° 60 mm @ 55° 30 mm @ 90°

16 mm @ 90°

45 mm @ 25° 40 mm @ 40° 40 mm @ 0°

45 mm @ 25° 40 mm @ 30°


The report stated that the Panther II turret was still being developed and therefore the report did not specify these angles.


51


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
Mr. Wallace emphasized that the Statutes did not confcr thc right of vote to the Vice-Presidents in
* Just in case this was due to the con-tinuous test signals, wc tried doing tone-burst tcsts at 10kH
I did not give up hope, though. It was not as if popular musie did not have an audience in Georgia -
166 proportion of GW in brick bodies conducts also to the reduction of density. It was reported that
1 11 there was nothing at the center there was nothing at the center ibcrt was nothing at thć center
Reflections In the previous section it was stated that the forward and backward waves may be entirel
64998 jff 011 After World War II, there was a period when the teaching of un-armed combat Arts was f
at the hotel vocabulary HOLIDAYSAn anecdote A man from Poland arrives in a hotel in London. There
11 oil’s qualitative composition was demonstrated and it was shown that the components of the invest
It is not probable that the American States will have a very free trade in the Med rranean; it will
We conducted our audit in accordance with Ausłralian Auditing Standards. We believe that the audit e
DSC30 (9) ‘No Overlay Feature Where there is no equivalent Admiralty paper chart, the UKHO does no
IMG43 Ernst Mach thc auilior was a philosophical amatcur and obviously did not know what hc was tal
bild118 When adjusting it is essential that the Chain should not be dead tight. so as to be slightl
APC 13 09 07 33 1 3d make for: (tr) move in the direction of We have to make for the rtort

więcej podobnych podstron