Screen shot 13 02 08 at 01 23
Yet the mask is the diflicult region of Phorography. Society, ii sccms, misrrusts purc mcaning: It wants mcan-ing, hut at the same timc it wants this mcaning to be surroundcd by a noise (as is said in cyhernetics) which will make it less acute. Hence the photograph whosc meaning (I am not saying ics eflect, but its meaning) is too impressive is quickly dcflected; we consume it aesthet-ically, not politically. The Photograph of the Mask is in fact critical enough to disturb (in 1934, the Nazis cen-sored Sander because his "faces of ihe period" did not corrcspond to the Nazi archetype of che race), but it is also 100 discrcet (or too "distinguished”) 10 constitute an authentie and effectivc social critique, at least according to the exigencics of militantism: what commirted science would acknowledge rhc interest of Physiognomy? Is not the very capacity to perceive the political or morał mcan-tng of a face a class dcviation? And even this is too much to say: Sander s Nocary is suffused with self-importancc and stiffness, his Usher with asscrtivencss and brutaliry; bur no notary, no usher could ever havc read such signs. As distancc, social observation here assumes the neces-sary intermediary role in a dclicatc aesrhctic, which ren-ders it futile: no critiquc except among thosc who arc already capable of cricicism. This impasse is something Iike Brccht's: hc was hostilc to Photography because (hc said) of the wcakncss of its critical power; but his own theater has nevcr bccn able to bc politically effcctive on account of ics subdery and its aestheticquality.
If wc except the rcalm of Advcrcising, where the mcaning must be elear and distinct only by reason of its mer-
''The censored Sandrr
because his 'facet of the period’ did not correspond to the aesthetic of the Tiazi race."
Sander Notary
Wyszukiwarka
Podobne podstrony:
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 01 08 our mythic dcnial of an apprchcnsion of dcath), Photog-raphy is a kin
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 01 15 acrobat, must defy thc laws of probabilicy or even of pos-sibility; a
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 01 31 cantilc naturę, the scmiology of Photography is therefore limited to
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 01 38 ii.. »» I-’ This longing to inhabit, if I obscnre it dearly in mysclf
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 01 45 shifts his close-ups of genitalia ftom the pomographic to the erotic
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 01 52 I The ttr*pp«d purnps James Van ona Zbe. Family Po*trait. 1926 0954);
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 01 59 Wii uam Klein: LtiTle Italy. New York. «9J4 Ccrtain dctails may "
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 03 23 NaDAR: Thh Artists Mon i er {or Wiph) one ńnger in the other hand, as
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 05 23 42 precisely that hai been, and because I live in thc illusion that i
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 04 21 (Hence the Winter Garden Photograph, however pale, is for me the trea
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 04 28 into reveric (this is perhaps the dcfinition of salon), is the simple
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 05 59 see, consubstantial with hcr face, cach day of het long life. Perhaps
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 00 01 pher; but I hadn’t—I don’t like all o f Mapplethorpc. Hcncc I could n
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 03 01 Now, one Novembcr evening shortly after my morher’s death, I was goin
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 58 32 i V Ćf-u/r/t/j i Pa i U Z c H r i Specialty of tbe Photograph
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 58 42 .Sdtory After-tbe-Fact and Silence Blind Field Palinodc RT Two "
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 58 50 ; UcLiiśJk P.W.MWrr-ff- One day, quite somc cimc ago, I happencd on a
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 59 00 Who could help me? From the First step, that of classification (wc mu
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 59 10 p amorous or funereal immobility, at the very heart of the moving wor
więcej podobnych podstron