Screen shot 13 02 08 at 01 31
cantilc naturę, the scmiology of Photography is therefore limited to the admirablc performanccs of several por-traitists. For the rest, with regard to the heterogeneity of "good” photographs, all we can say is tbat the object speaks, it induces us, vagucly, to think. And further: even this risks being perceived as dangerous. At the limit, no meaning at all is safer: the editors of Life rejcctcd Ker-tćsz’s photographs when hc arrived in the United States in 1937 because, rhey said, his images "spokc too much”; they madę us reflcct, suggested a meaning—a different meaning from the literał one. Ultima te ly, Photography is subversivc not when it frightens, rcpcls, or even stig-matizes, but when it is pensire, when it thinks.
An old housc, a shadowy porch, tiles, a crum-bling Arab decoration, a man sitting against the wali, a deserted Street, a Mcditcrranean tree (Charles Clifford’s “Alhambra"): this old photograph (1854) touches me: it is quitc simply there that I should like to live. This desire affccts mc at a depth and accord-ing to roots which I do not know: warmth of the climate? Mcditerranean myth? Apollinism? Dcfection? Witł»-drawal? Anonymity? Nobility? Whatever the casc (with regatd to myself, my motives, my fantasy), I want to livc there, en pnase—and tł»e tourist photograph never satis-fics that esprit de finetse. For mc, photographs of land-scape (urban or country) must be habitable, not visitablc.
*1 ivant to Uv0 there .. P CHAKLBS CUFPO*D: THI! ALHAMBRA (GRANADA).
Wyszukiwarka
Podobne podstrony:
Screen shot 13 02 08 at 01 45 shifts his close-ups of genitalia ftom the pomographic to the eroticScreen shot 13 02 08 at 01 08 our mythic dcnial of an apprchcnsion of dcath), Photog-raphy is a kinScreen shot 13 02 08 at 01 15 acrobat, must defy thc laws of probabilicy or even of pos-sibility; aScreen shot 13 02 08 at 01 23 Yet the mask is the diflicult region of Phorography. Society, ii sccmScreen shot 13 02 08 at 01 38 ii.. »» I-’ This longing to inhabit, if I obscnre it dearly in mysclfScreen shot 13 02 08 at 01 52 I The ttr*pp«d purnps James Van ona Zbe. Family Po*trait. 1926 0954);Screen shot 13 02 08 at 01 59 Wii uam Klein: LtiTle Italy. New York. «9J4 Ccrtain dctails may "Screen shot 13 02 08 at 05 31 can continue to speak of "likeness" wichout ever having sceScreen shot 13 02 08 at 00 19 } "I undtntood as once thas tbis photograph s 9adventuret Screen shot 13 02 08 at 04 41 tograph, for the first timc, puts an cnd to this resistance: hcnceforScreen shot 13 02 08 at 00 01 pher; but I hadn’t—I don’t like all o f Mapplethorpc. Hcncc I could nScreen shot 13 02 08 at 03 01 Now, one Novembcr evening shortly after my morher’s death, I was goinScreen shot 13 02 08 at 03 51 31 From che bcginning, I had determined on a pnnciple for mysclf: ncvScreen shot 13 02 08 at 58 32 i V Ćf-u/r/t/j i Pa i U Z c H r i Specialty of tbe PhotographScreen shot 13 02 08 at 58 42 .Sdtory After-tbe-Fact and Silence Blind Field Palinodc RT Two "Screen shot 13 02 08 at 58 50 ; UcLiiśJk P.W.MWrr-ff- One day, quite somc cimc ago, I happencd on aScreen shot 13 02 08 at 59 00 Who could help me? From the First step, that of classification (wc muScreen shot 13 02 08 at 59 10 p amorous or funereal immobility, at the very heart of the moving worScreen shot 13 02 08 at 59 19 laiaJUBlMM sonal impulscs, I would try to formulate the fundamenta! fwięcej podobnych podstron