1.9 Goals of Linguistic Theory and Unirersal Grammar Competence: complete, perfect knowledge of a Ianguage, intuitive łcnowledge of acceptability
which is part of the mcntal eąuipment of anative speaker (idealised native speaker] Performance: a native speaker's actual use of Ianguage Uniuersal Grammar: conditions that must be met by all human Ianguage s.
Universal Grammar is part of human biological endowment.
Creatiyity (opemiess/productivity): noveI utterances. idealised natiye speaker [no memory ŁLmitations]
1.10 Alternative Approaches:
Tagmemics (Pikę): assumes that Ianguage is one of the forms of human behaviour (verbal behaviour) and the primary function i3 the communicative one. Tagmeme (the smallest unit) is a syntactic counterpart of a phoneme in phonology.
Stratificational Grammar (Lamb): treats Ianguage as madę up of 4 strata and every sentence exists in all strata at the same tiine: sememic, lexemic, morphemic, phonemic.
Case Grammar (FiUmore & Gruber): assumes that base rules expand the sentence into:
(a) modality (tense, aspect, negations, ąuestions) and (b) proposition (case relationships)
[Agent/John + hit Goal/Bill + Instrument/with a hammer)
Relational Grammar (Perłmutter, Postał, Johnson): grammatical relations
Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar (Gazdar, Klein): GPSG rejects DS, transfomiations, psychological considerations; deals with dependencies; assigns to each syntactic description a translation into so called intensional logie.
Montague Grammar (R. Montague): treats syn.tax, semantics and pragmatics of natural languages as branches of mathematics; natural languages are to be studied like the structures of formal languages in logie (also: truth conditLonal interpretation). _
COMBTITPENTS (WORD GROUP3) AMD COMBTROCTION8 (RELATIONSHIPS) I Modification
(M) (H) (H) (M) (H) (M)
old man runs slowly he left because he was tired
Predlcation (99-100)
John sang
/ \
Subject Predicate The old man[S] cultivated bis garden (PJ. The man [S] who [S] came [P]left early [P]
Complementatłon
Peter [SJ łdssed [V] Mary [C=0].
John [S] is [V] dever [C],
John [S] is (V| a student [C].
I (S] want [V] to go [CJ.
Sub or dinatio n
She cried when [Sub] ahe fell down [D].
Coordinatlon (102)
Jack [I] and (Co) John [I] [coordinatior and independent unit]
Jack sings [I] but [Co] Mary dances [1]
Sentence Patterhs(see Quirk: S70CA)
Expanslons and Transformations
JA
'boy was [there]
/_V
mother left falm »> the little boy was wkere his mother left him Pattems: eg. Dogs chase cats.
(A£Bxm.)(Neg.)(Pass.)(Neg.Pass.)(Request)(Neg.-Req.)(Pass.-Req.)(Neg.-Pass.-Req.)(Quest.)(Neg.-Quest.)(Pass._Quest.)(Neg.-Pass-Quest.)___
7 . Genbrative-Tran3FORMatiqnal Grammar The boy ran to the park. =*■==*=*>
S
NP VP
D N Vi PP
Prep NP D N
Generative Grammarb: Sentence Basis. Generativeness. Types of Rules.
Phrase Structure Rule3: S->NP *- VP; NP~>D+N; PP---> Prep+NP; VP->Vi +(PP); VP~>Vt + NP; VP-> be+Adj
Deep and Surface Structures. Transformations. Rłcursion The old housefell down. [the housejthe house was old]fell down]
Deep Stracture> Relative T.> Be-deletion T.>Adjective movement T. >Surface Structure 8. Englibh Sentence Transformations & Phrase Structure Rules
Negative, Question, Tag, and Emphasis Transformations ( T neg., T quest., T tag., T emph.) Wh-Transformation (T wh), Passive transformation (T pass.) Reflexive Transformation (T refl.)
Imperatlve Transformation (T imper.) Relative Transformation (T rei.)
Be-Deletion and Adjective Movement Transformation (T be-del. and T Adj Movt.)_