3890689550

HISTORIC BUILDING THERMAL DIAGNOSTICS

ENERGY AUDIT-SELECTION OF THERMAL RETROFITTING PROCEDURES

3

MlCROClAIATE <4>

Ji

DISADVANTAGES

•non*

BASIC BŁOCK

DOCUUENTATtON

OfMnnptndlMCAW

ARCHIVAL

DOCUMENTATION

1:2:3

STANDARD BUILDING	BUILDING SURVEY USlNG
SURVEY	A 3D LASER SCANNER

~ł~~^

DESIGN DOCUMENTATION

=¥=

THERMAL RETROFITTING PROCEDURES
DłSADVANTAGES: —the txjHdmg’s techn^al condition renwis unidentified. —no mformabon about the kxxj -term behaviour of partuons post-retrofittmg. —freqoent errors n proper thermal retrofittmg procedurę sełoction loadmg lo a worsemng of the bu*Jing's techrucai condition		ADVANTAGES —provtded proper thermal retrofiłbng tochnoiogy setcction, a buik>ng's energy
		without its technicai condition bemg adverseły aftected

PROPOSAL OF ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES PRECEDING THERMAL RETROFITTING

IN SITU TESTING		ANALYSES:
>		“I
	Ucoer<Mni(i)		THFRUAl BROCES(S) I*
	THE RMOYttON (7)	^y!	MlłMOtTY (6) *■

>

AIRTIGHTNESS (3)

TeSTINGAUOMALYStS WSOITS GtVCN TO TMeCHCRGYAUOlTOn

^°JSSgg£-

seror tests and analyses proposed by the authors TO OPTMISE THERUAL RE TROK TT ING PROCEDURĘ SELECTION TOIMRROYE MISTORtCAL BiMLOING ENERGY PERFORMANCE WmtOUT ADYERSELY AffECTIHG TECHNICAI CONDITION

ADVANTAGES

—<Jeta»«łe<3 Identification of the buiWing^-* tcchncal oondibon.

—complete set of mformabon on the long-term behainour of butdmg partitions post-retrofitting;

—OuJding energy performance improyement wrthout adverseły affectmg tts technicai condition