118
CAROLINE GUIBET LAFAYE
Postmodemi architektura neni jen odrazem dominantnich rysu postmodemy. Studium teorii architektury ji poskytuje pozitivni obsah a ukazuje ji jako architekturu vyznamu, jako architekturu evokujici, ktera pouźivś symbolicke krylem' a urćity exp)icitni, tak rećeny „denotativni“ symbo-lismus, jeni se IiSi od modemistniho konotativniho symbolismu. Modernismus a postmodemis-mus se tudiź od sebe odliSuji tim, ie ruznć interpretuj! formulaci smyslu, vyznamu. Postmoderni umSni a architekturu Ize pochopit na horizontu obnovene interpretace kategorii, o ktere se opiralo modemisticke umćni (origin&lu, kopie, dila, subjektu, objektu, nitemeho, vnćj5iho).
Post-modem architecture is not only the reflection of the prevailing characteristics of the post-modernity. The study of the architectural theories confers posilive contents to the post-modem architecture, by showing that it is an architecture of significance, an evocative architecture, em-ploying a symbolic omamentalion system and a “denotative" symbolism, whereas the modem architecture used a connotative symbolism. Modemism and postmodernism are characterized thus by a divergent interprelation of the formulation of the sense and of the signification. Post-modem art and post-modem architecture should be understood on the perspective of a renewed interpreta-tion of the modemistic categories on which the modem art was laid (original, copy, work, subject, object, interior, outside).