20
W. K. ANTARKAR
18. For Shri Nakamura’s argumcnts, vide his book “A łlisloty of Early Vcdanta Philosophy", pp. 48 to 89.
19. Vide book : “Is Sandrakoltus Candmgupta Maurya ?" by Shri Shriram Salhc.
20. These poinis have bcen lakcn by me from Shri S.D. Kulkamfs book in Maralhi
- 34*4 pp. 218, 219.
20a. Ali the discussion above perlaining to tlie two Synchronisms has been lak en from Shri T.S. Narayan Sastryłs book ‘The Mis takcn Greek Synchronism in Indian l!istory\ available in National Library BeWcdere, Calculta -7.
21. Vide 'Ancient India as described by Megas. ajid Arrian. ” Trans, by J.W. Mckrińdle, pp. 106/7, 116/7, 123/4, 127-129.
22. Ibid. p. 138 and the long foolnolc on ihc same page.
mfamt r»fi n
25. Lord Elphinstone in his book, ‘Ilislory of India* says tliat lo take the hislory of ancient India prior to the time calculalion given in the liiblc (4004 B.C.) is lo aecept ihat the Bibie is wrong. We have, thereforc, to bring down the Indian hislorical calculalion so as lo be morę consistent willi our notions; Vol. IV, Ch.3.
26. The letter was daled 16.12.1868.
27. Vide Ilislory of ancient Sanskril (Indian) Literaturę, by Max Muller, p. 145.
28. Vide Organiser, Republic Day Special, Jan.23, 1994. “Il was politics Ihcn, il is politics now * by Dr. N.S. Rajaram, pp. 19 -22.