1
Descriptive grammar year 2
Lecture 19: Relative clauses
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
2
Types of relative constructions
• Postmodifiers of the N.
• Are related the the
antecedent N
.
• Contain an
anaphoric element
– the
relative pronoun, the or zero pronoun.
– The interpetation of the anaphoric element
determined by the antecedent.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
3
Types of relative constructions
• (1)
They’ll be happy to take the clothes
• (a)
which you don’t want ___
.
– [wh-relative]
• (b)
that you don’t want ___
.
– [non-wh: that-relative]
• (c)
Ø you don’t want ___
.
– [non-wh: zero relative]
Antecedent of the
relative pronoun
Unstated (but
understood)
object of want
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
4
The relative pronoun
• Wh-relatives:
– which
([-personal] antecedent N)
– Who
([+personal] antecedent N)
• That-relatives: a relative pronoun or a
complementizer?
• (2a)
They’ll be happy to take the clothes [(that)
you don’t want]
.
– [relative clause]: that can be omitted.
• (2b)
I know [(that) you are right]
.
– [complement clause]: that can be omitted too.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
5
Relative clause
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
6
Complement that-clause
2
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
7
That as complementizer
• Opinion 1: a relative pronoun – has a
similar distribution to who/which.
• Opinion 2: the same marker of clause
subordination as the complementizer that.
– Evidence: the structure of non-finite relative
clauses:
– (3)
Let’s think of something [to talk about]
.
– never introduced by that, like non-finite
complement clauses – so the distribution of
that is NOT like the distribution of who/which.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
8
Polish
• Relative clauses are universal.
• Engl. that-complementizer and the relative
pronouns = Polish
ż
e
(compl)
, która
(rel.
pron.)
, co
(rel. pron.).
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
9
Relational types
• (4a)
The boys who defaced the statue were
expelled
.
– [restrictive relative]
• (4b)
My father, who retired last year, now lives in
Paris
.
– [non-restrictive rel.]
• (4c)
It was Kim who wanted Pat as treasurer
.
– [cleft relative]
• (4d)
What you say is quite right
.
– [nominal relative] – a NP, not a clause
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
10
The restrictive relative clause
• The most central and the most frequent
type of relative constructions.
• A modifier within a nominal constituent.
• Serves to restrict the denotation of the
head N it modifies.
• The information expressed in the relative
clause is an integral part of that expressed
by the matrix clause.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
11
The non-restrictive relative clause
• Adds extra information about the
antecedent.
• The info is not needed to delimit the set
denoted by the antecedent.
• The info is separate from that expressed in
the rest of the sentence.
• Marked off prosodically or by punctuation.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
12
The cleft relative clause
• Divides the sentence into two parts, one of
which is in focus, the other is not.
• (4c)
Kim
is in focus and
wanted Pat as
treasurer
is not (i.e. it is the topic).
3
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
13
The nominal relative construction
• Always of the wh-type.
• You CAN’T separate a relative clause from
its antecedent:
• (5a)
It would mean abandoning
that
which
we hold most dear
.
– [
antecedent
+ relative clause]
• (5b)
It would mean abandoning what we
hold most dear
.
– [nominal relative], what = antecedent +
rel.pron.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
14
Finiteness
• Restrictive relatives can be infinitival.
• May be of the wh-type or without a relative
word.
• (6a)
She found a good place from which to
watch a procession
.
• (6b)
She found a good place to watch the
procession from
.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
15
Relativisation
• The
relativised element
– the anaphoric
element ( subj. or object).
• A relativised subject with the form of the relative
pronoun:
• (7a)
A letter drew our attention to the problem
.
[main clause]
• (7b)
This is the
letter
i
[
which
i
drew our attention
to the problem]
[wh-relative]
• (7c)
This is the
letter
i
[that
___
i
drew our
attention to the problem]
[that-rel.]
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
16
Relativisation
• Limitations on the zero pronoun:
– in sentences with relativised subject there is
no zero relative counterpart:
– *This is the letter drew our attention to the
problem
.
– in sentences with relativised object that is
optional (the following example 8).
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
17
Relativisation
• A relativised object with the form of the relative
pronoun:
• (8a)
My mother gave me some advice
.
[main claue]
• (8b)
I thought about the
advice
i
[
which
i
my
mother gave me
__
i
].
[wh-relative]
• (8c)
I thought about the
advice
i
[that my mother
gave me
___
i
].
[that-relative]
• (8d)
I thought about the
advice
i
[my mother gave
me
___
i
].
[zero relative]
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
18
Relativisation
• The gap in object function
is linked to the relative
pronoun
which
.
• The rel.pron. is
interpreted as having the
function of the gap – of
the object.
• The indirect object cannot
be relativised at all:
• (9)
*I [that/who(m)/Ø my
mother gave some
advice] will think about it
.
4
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
19
Relativisation strategies
•
Relative pronoun strategy
– using relative
pronouns to introduce the relative clause.
•
Complemetizer strategy
– using that to
introduce the relative clause.
•
Zero strategy
– absence of an element that
signals post-modification.
•
Resumptive pronoun strategy
– using a
resumptive pronoun in the relative clause (not
completely grammatical in English).
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
20
The resumptive pronoun
• A pron. that refers back to a previously
realized item within the same syntactic
structure.
• In relative clauses they are realized twice:
– once as a relative pronoun and
– once as a resumptive one.
• Marginal in standard English but quite
acceptable in colloquial speech.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
21
The resumptive pronoun
• (10a)
My friend, she is coming to visit me
.
– [resumptive pronoun]
• (10b) ?
I have three people that I don’t
know how they are in other classes
.
• (10c) ?
The deficit is a problem [that no
one has any idea what to do with it]
.
– [resumptive pron. in relative clauses]
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
22
The resumptive pronoun
• They optimally convey some required meaning
in a particular context more clearly.
• Polish: relative clauses with co as
complementizer (prescriptive grammarians
consider it ill-formed):
• (11a)
Szukam tego “Time’a”, [ co mi go
po
ż
yczyła
ś
].
(cf. co/którego mi po
ż
yczyła
ś
)
• (11b)
Ta reklama, [co ci o niej mówiłam] jest
niesamowita
. (cf. o której ci mówiłam)
• (11c)
Co mam zrobi
ć
z fantem, [co go mam na
my
ś
li]?
(cf. którego mam na my
ś
li)
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
23
Relative clauses vs. complement
clauses
• (12a)
I think [that it is going to rain].
[complement clause]
– if the complementizer is removed, the clause can still
be used as a complete sentence:
It is going to rain
.
– Cf. Polish:
My
ś
l
ę
,
ż
e b
ę
dzie pada
ć
.
B
ę
dzie pada
ć
.
• (12b)
The people [that you’ve invited] are here.
[relative clause]
– if the complementizer is removed, the clause cannot
stand as an independent sentence:
*You’ve invited
.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
24
Relative phrases
• The
relative phrase
– always clause-initial.
– A
simple
relative phrase:
who, whom, which, where
,
etc.
– A
complex
relative phrase: a relative word together
with other material.
• (13a) I can’t find the
book
i
[
which
i
he
recommended
__
i
]
• (13b) We’ve never met the
people
i
[
[
whose
i
house]
j
we are renting
__
j
]
• (13c) We admired the
skill
i
[
[with
which
i
]
j
he
handled the situation
__
j
]
5
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
25
Non-wh relatives
• No relative phrases:
• (14a)
I can’t find the book [that I
recommended]
.
• (14b)
*We’ve never met the people [that’s
house we are renting]
.
• (14c)
*We admired the skill [with that she
handled the situation]
.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
26
Wh-relatives and wh-questions
• Historically wh-words were only used at
the beginning of questions,
• later their usage spread to other areas of
grammar.
• So relativisation is the result of wh-
movement – English uses wh-movement
wherever wh-words occur.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
27
Wh-movement
• Wh-movement = wh-fronting:
• (8b)
the advice
i
[
which
i
my mother gave me
__
i
].
• The relative pronoun originated in object
position.
• Then it was moved (raised) to the initial
position in the relative clause, leaving a
gap in the object position.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
28
Long-distance wh-movement
• Long-distance movement in wh-questions:
• (15)
What
i
do you think [they expect
[they’ll be able [to photograph
__
i
]]]?
– Cf. Lecture 7.
• In relative clauses:
• (16)
Here’s a
gift
i
[
which
i
I hope [you’ll be
pleased [to encourage your friend [to
accept
__
i
]
.
Descriptive grammar 19, year 2
29
Long-distance wh-movement
• The rel. pronoun originates in the position
of the object of the V
accept
.
• Then it is moved to the initial position in
the relative clause, leaving a gap behind.
• The gap is anaphorically linked to
which
,
i.e.
which
is the antecedent of the gap.
• In turn,
which
is anaphorically linked to the
head N
gift
which is the antecedent of
which
.