L19 relative clauses

background image

1

Descriptive grammar year 2

Lecture 19: Relative clauses

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

2

Types of relative constructions

• Postmodifiers of the N.

• Are related the the

antecedent N

.

• Contain an

anaphoric element

– the

relative pronoun, the or zero pronoun.

– The interpetation of the anaphoric element

determined by the antecedent.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

3

Types of relative constructions

• (1)

They’ll be happy to take the clothes

• (a)

which you don’t want ___

.

– [wh-relative]

• (b)

that you don’t want ___

.

– [non-wh: that-relative]

• (c)

Ø you don’t want ___

.

– [non-wh: zero relative]

Antecedent of the

relative pronoun

Unstated (but

understood)

object of want

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

4

The relative pronoun

Wh-relatives:

which

([-personal] antecedent N)

Who

([+personal] antecedent N)

That-relatives: a relative pronoun or a

complementizer?

• (2a)

They’ll be happy to take the clothes [(that)

you don’t want]

.

– [relative clause]: that can be omitted.

• (2b)

I know [(that) you are right]

.

– [complement clause]: that can be omitted too.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

5

Relative clause

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

6

Complement that-clause

background image

2

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

7

That as complementizer

Opinion 1: a relative pronoun – has a

similar distribution to who/which.

Opinion 2: the same marker of clause

subordination as the complementizer that.

– Evidence: the structure of non-finite relative

clauses:

– (3)

Let’s think of something [to talk about]

.

– never introduced by that, like non-finite

complement clauses – so the distribution of
that is NOT like the distribution of who/which.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

8

Polish

• Relative clauses are universal.

• Engl. that-complementizer and the relative

pronouns = Polish

ż

e

(compl)

, która

(rel.

pron.)

, co

(rel. pron.).

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

9

Relational types

• (4a)

The boys who defaced the statue were

expelled

.

– [restrictive relative]

• (4b)

My father, who retired last year, now lives in

Paris

.

– [non-restrictive rel.]

• (4c)

It was Kim who wanted Pat as treasurer

.

– [cleft relative]

• (4d)

What you say is quite right

.

– [nominal relative] – a NP, not a clause

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

10

The restrictive relative clause

• The most central and the most frequent

type of relative constructions.

• A modifier within a nominal constituent.

• Serves to restrict the denotation of the

head N it modifies.

• The information expressed in the relative

clause is an integral part of that expressed
by the matrix clause.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

11

The non-restrictive relative clause

• Adds extra information about the

antecedent.

• The info is not needed to delimit the set

denoted by the antecedent.

• The info is separate from that expressed in

the rest of the sentence.

• Marked off prosodically or by punctuation.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

12

The cleft relative clause

• Divides the sentence into two parts, one of

which is in focus, the other is not.

• (4c)

Kim

is in focus and

wanted Pat as

treasurer

is not (i.e. it is the topic).

background image

3

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

13

The nominal relative construction

• Always of the wh-type.
• You CAN’T separate a relative clause from

its antecedent:

• (5a)

It would mean abandoning

that

which

we hold most dear

.

– [

antecedent

+ relative clause]

• (5b)

It would mean abandoning what we

hold most dear

.

– [nominal relative], what = antecedent +

rel.pron.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

14

Finiteness

• Restrictive relatives can be infinitival.

• May be of the wh-type or without a relative

word.

• (6a)

She found a good place from which to

watch a procession

.

• (6b)

She found a good place to watch the

procession from

.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

15

Relativisation

• The

relativised element

– the anaphoric

element ( subj. or object).

• A relativised subject with the form of the relative

pronoun:

• (7a)

A letter drew our attention to the problem

.

[main clause]

• (7b)

This is the

letter

i

[

which

i

drew our attention

to the problem]

[wh-relative]

• (7c)

This is the

letter

i

[that

___

i

drew our

attention to the problem]

[that-rel.]

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

16

Relativisation

• Limitations on the zero pronoun:

– in sentences with relativised subject there is

no zero relative counterpart:

*This is the letter drew our attention to the

problem

.

– in sentences with relativised object that is

optional (the following example 8).

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

17

Relativisation

• A relativised object with the form of the relative

pronoun:

• (8a)

My mother gave me some advice

.

[main claue]

• (8b)

I thought about the

advice

i

[

which

i

my

mother gave me

__

i

].

[wh-relative]

• (8c)

I thought about the

advice

i

[that my mother

gave me

___

i

].

[that-relative]

• (8d)

I thought about the

advice

i

[my mother gave

me

___

i

].

[zero relative]

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

18

Relativisation

• The gap in object function

is linked to the relative
pronoun

which

.

• The rel.pron. is

interpreted as having the
function of the gap – of
the object.

• The indirect object cannot

be relativised at all:

• (9)

*I [that/who(m)/Ø my

mother gave some
advice] will think about it

.

background image

4

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

19

Relativisation strategies

Relative pronoun strategy

– using relative

pronouns to introduce the relative clause.

Complemetizer strategy

– using that to

introduce the relative clause.

Zero strategy

– absence of an element that

signals post-modification.

Resumptive pronoun strategy

– using a

resumptive pronoun in the relative clause (not
completely grammatical in English).

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

20

The resumptive pronoun

• A pron. that refers back to a previously

realized item within the same syntactic
structure.

• In relative clauses they are realized twice:

– once as a relative pronoun and

– once as a resumptive one.

• Marginal in standard English but quite

acceptable in colloquial speech.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

21

The resumptive pronoun

• (10a)

My friend, she is coming to visit me

.

– [resumptive pronoun]

• (10b) ?

I have three people that I don’t

know how they are in other classes

.

• (10c) ?

The deficit is a problem [that no

one has any idea what to do with it]

.

– [resumptive pron. in relative clauses]

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

22

The resumptive pronoun

• They optimally convey some required meaning

in a particular context more clearly.

• Polish: relative clauses with co as

complementizer (prescriptive grammarians
consider it ill-formed):

• (11a)

Szukam tego “Time’a”, [ co mi go

po

ż

yczyła

ś

].

(cf. co/którego mi po

ż

yczyła

ś

)

• (11b)

Ta reklama, [co ci o niej mówiłam] jest

niesamowita

. (cf. o której ci mówiłam)

• (11c)

Co mam zrobi

ć

z fantem, [co go mam na

my

ś

li]?

(cf. którego mam na my

ś

li)

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

23

Relative clauses vs. complement

clauses

• (12a)

I think [that it is going to rain].

[complement clause]

– if the complementizer is removed, the clause can still

be used as a complete sentence:

It is going to rain

.

– Cf. Polish:

My

ś

l

ę

,

ż

e b

ę

dzie pada

ć

.



B

ę

dzie pada

ć

.

• (12b)

The people [that you’ve invited] are here.

[relative clause]

– if the complementizer is removed, the clause cannot

stand as an independent sentence:

*You’ve invited

.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

24

Relative phrases

• The

relative phrase

– always clause-initial.

– A

simple

relative phrase:

who, whom, which, where

,

etc.

– A

complex

relative phrase: a relative word together

with other material.

• (13a) I can’t find the

book

i

[

which

i

he

recommended

__

i

]

• (13b) We’ve never met the

people

i

[

[

whose

i

house]

j

we are renting

__

j

]

• (13c) We admired the

skill

i

[

[with

which

i

]

j

he

handled the situation

__

j

]

background image

5

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

25

Non-wh relatives

• No relative phrases:

• (14a)

I can’t find the book [that I

recommended]

.

• (14b)

*We’ve never met the people [that’s

house we are renting]

.

• (14c)

*We admired the skill [with that she

handled the situation]

.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

26

Wh-relatives and wh-questions

• Historically wh-words were only used at

the beginning of questions,

• later their usage spread to other areas of

grammar.

• So relativisation is the result of wh-

movement – English uses wh-movement
wherever wh-words occur.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

27

Wh-movement

Wh-movement = wh-fronting:

• (8b)

the advice

i

[

which

i

my mother gave me

__

i

].

• The relative pronoun originated in object

position.

• Then it was moved (raised) to the initial

position in the relative clause, leaving a
gap in the object position.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

28

Long-distance wh-movement

• Long-distance movement in wh-questions:

• (15)

What

i

do you think [they expect

[they’ll be able [to photograph

__

i

]]]?

– Cf. Lecture 7.

• In relative clauses:

• (16)

Here’s a

gift

i

[

which

i

I hope [you’ll be

pleased [to encourage your friend [to
accept

__

i

]

.

Descriptive grammar 19, year 2

29

Long-distance wh-movement

• The rel. pronoun originates in the position

of the object of the V

accept

.

• Then it is moved to the initial position in

the relative clause, leaving a gap behind.

• The gap is anaphorically linked to

which

,

i.e.

which

is the antecedent of the gap.

• In turn,

which

is anaphorically linked to the

head N

gift

which is the antecedent of

which

.


Wyszukiwarka

Podobne podstrony:
relative clauses
relative clauses
28 Relative Clauses, Tragedia Piotra Włostowica, Moje dokumenty
pisanie 14 relative clause
Relative clauses
Relative clauses
islcollective worksheets preintermediate a2 intermediate b1 adult high sch relative clauses antiguo
31 Relative clauses
PROCESSING OF THE REDUCED RELATIVE CLAUSE VERSUS MAIN VERB AMBIGUITY IN L2 LEARNERS AT DIFFERENT PRO
relative clauses
Relative clause1
relative clauses 2
Relative clauses
relative clauses
Defining and non defining relative clauses
A syntactic contrastive analysis of the relative clauses in Arabic and English
Relative Clauses

więcej podobnych podstron