Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Customer-induced stress in call centre work:
A comparison of audio- and videoconference
Ju¨rgen Wegge
1
*, Joachim Vogt
2
and Christiane Wecking
3
1
Technical University of Dresden, Germany
2
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
3
University of Dortmund, Germany
Call centre work was simulated in an experiment with 96 experienced call centre
agents. The experimental design comprised two factors. First, agents communicated
with customers either via phone, pc-videoconference or pc-videoconference with
additional instructions increasing time pressure. The second experimental factor varied
customer behaviour: half of the customers were friendly whereas the other half were
rude. Several indicators of strain (e.g. emotional dissonance, tiredness) were assessed
by self-reports. Moreover, the levels of immunoglobulin A (IgA) in salvia were
determined at three sampling points and specific behaviours of agents (e.g. smiling to
customers) were assessed using video data. It was found that unfriendly customer
behaviour led to more strain and lower call performance than friendly customer
behaviour. Inducing time pressure increased IgA-levels and reduced talking-time with
customers. However, contrary to the expectations, the availability of video data did not
enhance strain of agents. Instead, it was found that videoconferencing increased
activation of agents if customers were friendly. Since higher levels of activation can
counteract boredom and because customers often prefer to see their service
providers, adding videoconference facilities in call centres seem to be a fruitful way of
enriching routine call centre work.
The main purpose of this paper is to contribute to research on stress in call centre work.
As different forms of computer-mediated communication (e.g. emails, videoconference)
become more and more prominent as vehicles for communication (Olson & Olson,
2003; Wegge, 2006; Wegge & Bipp, 2004), and because in call centre work computers as
well as electronic connections with customers are already available, it is likely that
having a videoconference will soon be part of the daily work of agents. Therefore, it is
interesting to explore whether this new form of interaction with customers is neutral
with respect to strain and performance of call centre agents. Is a phone call with a verbal
aggressive customer more demanding when agents and customers can also see each
* Correspondence should be addressed to Prof. Dr Ju¨rgen Wegge, TU Dresden, Fakulta¨t Mathematik und
Naturwissenschaften, Arbeits und Organisation Psychologie, 01062 Dresden, Germany (e-mail: wegge@psychologie.tu-
dresden.de).
The
British
Psychological
Society
693
Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (2007), 80, 693–712
q
2007 The British Psychological Society
www.bpsjournals.co.uk
DOI:10.1348/096317906X164927
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
other? And what happens if customers are in a good mood and make compliments
towards agents? Do agents feel comfortable in this situation, and particularly so if they
can see the customers? The main purpose of this research is to collect empirical
evidence that allows answering these and similar questions. In a laboratory experiment
with experienced call centre agents as participants, we investigated whether the typical
work of agents changes when talks with customers are conduced via videoconference.
In addressing this issue, we further analyse the impact of two common stressors in call
centre work: customer aggression and time pressure. In the following, we first address
the phenomenon of customer-induced stress. Next, we present a brief overview
regarding research on videoconferencing and discuss potential benefits and problems of
this communication technology in call centre work.
Customer aggression as a prominent stressor in call centre work
Previous studies have shown that customers are often rude (Dormann & Zapf, 2004) and
this is also the case in interactions with call centre agents (Grandey, Dickter, & Sin,
2004). Since agents are supposed to be always friendly to customers, and because their
performance is usually controlled by the organization (e.g. by making test calls),
deviations from this norm will easily be detected (Holman, 2003). Hence, strong
requirements to hide or downplay negative emotions and to fake positive emotions
during work are present in call centre work. A study of Totterdell and Holman (2003)
illustrates this point. Using a time-sampling (diary) method over 2 weeks, Totterdell and
Holman found in a sample of 18 call centre agents that in about 9% of all occasions,
customers were judged to be unpleasant and that this was significantly associated with
agents faking emotions. They reported that they tried to appear more enthusiastic as
they would feel on 58% of all occasions. The opposite form of faking emotions (to be less
enthusiastic as felt) occurred only in 15% of all occasions. This specific phenomenon – a
discrepancy between expressed and felt emotions – is named ‘emotional dissonance’ in
theories of emotion work (Grandey, 2000; Zapf, 2002) and several prior studies found
that unfriendly or rude customers induce more emotional dissonance than friendly
customers in service jobs (e.g. flight attendants, retail clerks; Dormann & Zapf, 2004;
Fischbach, 2003; Tschan, Rochat, & Zapf, 2005). For call centre work, at least one study
with similar findings is available (Wegge, van Dick, & Wecking, 2006). Moreover, we
know from prior research that the volitional presentation of non-felt emotions and the
continuous self-control of one’s own feelings are demanding and, therefore, might also
lead to lower task performance (see Tice & Bratslavsky, 2000; Zapf, 2002 for reviews).
Accordingly, we propose:
H1a:
Compared to friendly customers, unfriendly customers provoke more intense emotions
and induce more strain (e.g. emotional dissonance) in call centre agents.
H1b:
Compared to friendly customers, unfriendly customers provoke a less friendly service
(e.g. less laughing) and lower task performance (deviations from scripts) of agents.
Potential effects of videoconferencing in call centre work
To our knowledge, no empirical studies are available that investigated the effects of
videoconferencing (vc) in call centre work. However, several basic features of
videoconferencing (e.g. availability of video data) are relevant for this work environment,
too. When compared with communication via e-mail or phone, facial information as well
694
Ju¨rgen Wegge et al.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
as other non-verbal signals can be utilized and prior studies found that this helps, for
example to improve speech perception, person identification, perception and inference
of emotional states, and the general regulation of conversations (Bruce, 1996; Finn, Sellen,
& Wilbur, 1997; Wallbott, 1998). However, there is also strong evidence documenting that
communication via videoconference has some specific disadvantages. These disadvan-
tages are based on several features of videoconferences. The most important features are:
(a) the missing eye-contact due to the use of cameras and camera positioning; (b) a
temporal delay of signals due to coding and transmission times; (c) the fade-out of some
visual information and (d) the use of physically separated rooms (Finn et al., 1997; Meier,
2000). All these differences can lead to severe problems in communicating via
videoconference such as problems regarding effective turn-taking during discussions or
problems with respect to using continuous backchannel signals (e.g. ‘Yes’, ‘I see’) that
indicate understanding and communication readiness. In view of these problems, it is no
surprise that users of vc often produce longer and more interrupted dialogues and develop
less mutual understanding, even when compared with those who solely use an audio-link
(O’Mailley, Langton, & Anderson, 1996; Purdy, 2000; see however Day & Schneider, 2002).
In addition, it is regularly found that participants overcompensate communication
problems in videoconferences by increasing the level of verbal and non-verbal behaviour
(Blokland & Anderson, 1998; Meier, 2000). This can make the communication situation
strange and might hinder individuals to express themselves as usual.
Communication between call centre agents and customers serves various purposes,
for example taking orders, advertising and hard selling. Therefore, it might be that the
availability of the customers’ video data improves the quality of these services because
speech perception, person identification and the inference of emotional states of
customers are improved. Based on a better regulation of conversations with customers
and in view of possible multimedia effects, the social influence of agents on customers
should be enhanced. This conclusion is also consistent with results obtained in social
presence research. The concept of social presence comprises a number of dimensions
relating to the degree of interpersonal contact (e.g. immediacy, intimacy). Developed by
Short, Williams, and Christie (1976), this effect represents a basis for many later models
of computer-mediated communication (e.g. media richness, for a recent review, see
Tanis, 2003). Social presence is defined by Short et al. (1976, p. 65) as the degree of
salience of the other person in the interaction. It is assumed that social presence is
conveyed by many features such as non-verbal signals and facial expression. Increased
social presence should make interactions more personal, spontaneous and efficient in
terms of personal influence. In support of this proposition, several studies have found
that different media types can be distinguished with respect to social presence
judgments. Face-to-face (ftf) communication is judged as most socially present and
written messages are rated least socially present. For videoconferences, only few data
are available but most researchers (e.g. Short et al., 1976; Wegge, Bipp, & Kleinbeck,
2007) reported high values close to ftf-communication.
As the social presence of customers should be also high in communication via
videoconference, it is very likely that messages or actions of customers lead to more
intensive states and processes (e.g. attitudes, behaviour, emotions) on the side of
the agent compared with a similar situation where customers and agents communicate
phone-to-phone. Therefore, it is likely that negative emotions induced by aggressive
customers, for example should be experienced more intense when communication is
conducted via videoconference. Moreover, in a videoconference between an agent and a
customer, customers have access to video data of the agent and, of course, the agent is
Customer-induced stress in call centre work
695
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
aware of this. According to the theory of objective self-awareness (Wicklund, 1979), the
availability of cameras and/or one’s own picture in a social situation increases
self-awareness. Furthermore, it was found in several studies that a high degree of self-
awareness makes persons more self-critical so that emotional states that are experienced
in the actual situation should become more salient (Wegge, 2006). Hence, the
experience of emotions as well as the experience of emotional dissonance of agents is
probably increased by the availability of the own picture on the side of customers.
Based on the research reviewed above and the underlying theories, in particular
social presence theory (Short et al., 1976) and the theory of self-awareness (Wicklund,
1979), we formulate the following hypotheses with respect to the potential impact of
videoconferencing on strain and behaviour of call centre agents.
H2a:
Compared to an audio interaction, the availability of video data leads to more intensive
emotions of agents and more intensive strain (e.g. emotional dissonance).
H2b:
Compared to an audio interaction, the availability of video data leads to more intensive
expression of positive emotions (e.g. laughing, smiling, showing agreement).
It should be noted that we did not expect any effect of video data on the expression
of negative emotions as participants were asked to be always friendly to customers.
Moreover, participants were trained call centre agents who know the importance of this
rule and their actual behaviour was videotaped (cf. method section).
Time pressure as an additional stressor
A further common stressor in call centre work is time pressure (Holman, 2003; Zapf,
2002). Customers usually expect to be served as quickly as possible. However, due to
unexpected high call volumes or mismanaged call distributions, many customers
experience long waiting times. As customer satisfaction is negatively affected by long
waiting times, the tasks of agents are often conducted under high time-pressure (Taylor
& Bain, 1999). Most phone calls with customers take only a few minutes and feedback or
incentives are available in many call centres to handle calls as fast as possible (Holman,
2003). In addition, prior research has shown that strain of agents (e.g. emotional
exhaustion) is higher if the average length of calls is short (Deery, Iverson, & Walsh,
2002). It can also be expected that time pressure causes acute arousal, for example
activation of the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary system which can be monitored by
means of electrophysiological and biochemical methods, for example by measuring
immunoglobulin A (IgA) secretion. IgA is an immunological protein that is present in the
secretions covering the mucosa, and it forms a first line of defence against invading
pathogens. IgA secretion has been used as a measure of both acute arousal and chronic
strain because it increases in acute active coping situations within minutes of challenge
whereas passive coping after prolonged periods of chronic stress causes reduced
transport of this antibody. As the experiment presented here used the former kind of
acute active coping situations in call centre work, IgA seemed a suitable
biopsychological indicator of acute arousal in addition to self-report (e.g. emotional
dissonance) and observation data (e.g. talking times). Overall, high time-pressure is a
common problem in call centre work and well-being is typically found to be reduced in
this context if time pressure is high. Therefore, we decided to examine the importance
of this stressor by adding conditions with high time-pressure when agents
communicated via videoconference. Our first corresponding hypothesis is:
696
Ju¨rgen Wegge et al.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
H3a:
Adding time pressure in a videoconference with customers leads to higher strain (e.g.
emotional dissonance, high salivary IgA-levels) and less time talking with customers.
In addition, we examined a hypothesis regarding the interaction between time
pressure and customer friendliness. This proposition is build on the above derived
assumptions, namely, that agents have mainly problems with unfriendly customers and
high time-pressure:
H3b:
The impact of time pressure on customer-induced strain (e.g. emotional dissonance) is
moderated by customer friendliness: if customers are unfriendly, the negative effect of time
pressure is amplified.
Method
Participants
The sample consisted of 42 male and 54 female call centre agents. After getting approval
from management, agents were recruited by advertisements that were distributed to 20
call centres. They were asked to participate in a simulation study on call centre work for
25e. In some experimental conditions, further financial incentives for attaining goals
related to communication times with customers were provided (see below).
The participants’ mean age was 29.8 years (SD ¼ 9
:9). Agents had to work at least 2
months in a call centre in order to participate in this study (mean tenure was 37.5
months, SD ¼ 35
:7).
General procedure
On arrival, the experimenter informed participants that this study examines causes of
stress in call centre work. He explained that three salvia samples (allowing the
measurement of immunoglobulin A, IgA) and answers to several questionnaires have to
be given for this purpose. To increase the realism of this simulation, the laboratory room
and the whole material and equipment closely resembled a typical call centre office.
Next, participants received a detailed introduction to the experimental simulation and
an explanation of their computer workplace. They were told that they were hired as an
agent responsible for customer services linked to mobile phones produced by the firm
‘OTKOM’. The experimenter explained that agents always would have to be very
friendly to customers and that OTKOM sees the customers as ‘kings’. Therefore, agents
were required to give an excellent service and always had to ‘smile down the line’.
The experimenter further explained that six customer calls conducted by two other
experimenters simulating typical customer behaviour follow later on. To analyse the
communication processes in detail, all interactions were videotaped with the informed
consent of participants. The corresponding camera was positioned in an unobtrusive
way in a shelf about 2 m away from the workplace. Participants were informed that
customers can have three different types of wishes: information requests, complains
regarding a product or the wish to order a product. The agents’ task was to determine
the actual type of customer request and select the corresponding option presented in
the computer program available for solving these tasks. Next, they should follow the
specified sequence of questions that was also presented on the screen. The task is
described more fully below.
Customer-induced stress in call centre work
697
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
In this introduction, the experimenter also explained the rules for gaining additional
incentives in experimental conditions with time pressure (see below). He then
distributed a first questionnaire, including biographical questions (e.g. age, gender, prior
work in call centres) and collected a first salvia sample (IgA-I) as a baseline measure.
The experimenter left the room, went over to the second laboratory and re-established
contact with the participant via the computer according to the selected communication
condition (see below). He clarified remaining questions regarding the handling of the
equipment. Next, all participants conducted six standardized talks with ‘customers’ of
OTKOM mobiles. The role of customers was played by four additional experimenters
who were unknown to participants. The experimenters (costumers) were trained for
this purpose and blind to the hypotheses of the experiment. They always followed
standardized scripts in each talk and worked as two mixed-sex teams (each participant
met only one ‘customer team’) calling participants in an alternate sequence.
After each of the six customer talks participants had to answer a brief mood checklist
assessing several aspects of their actual emotional state (e.g. degree of activation,
emotional dissonance). After the third talk, the first experimenter returned to the room
of the participant. He distributed a second questionnaire measuring customer
friendliness and collected a second salvia sample (IgA-II). The experimenter then left
the room once again and informed the ‘customers’ to continue their talks. After six talks
had been completed, the experimenter returned to the participant. He distributed a
third questionnaire measuring once again customer friendliness and collected a third
salvia sample (IgA-III). Finally, participants were paid and debriefed.
Experimental design
The design of the experiment was a 3(communication condition) £ 2(customer
behaviour) between-subject design. Participants were randomly assigned to each of the
six experimental conditions so that 15–17 individuals participated in each condition.
Contacts with customers (communication factor) were varied in such a way that either
all interactions with customers were conducted via phone ( phone), via videoconfer-
ence (vc) or via videoconference with additional instructions inducing time pressure
(vc plus time pressure). In this third condition, participants were informed that
additional financial incentives could be gained if they manage to serve customers
quickly. For each talk below 120 seconds, two extra Euros were paid. In order to provide
time-feedback, a clock that was started at the beginning of each conversation with
customers was visible on the computer screen in this condition. When the
experimenter returned after the third talk, he also stated how much additional money
was gained. Participants were further informed in this condition that the quality of
customer service is more important than service speed. Therefore, none of the elements
of the communication scripts should be omitted. Two customer calls were designed to
allow keeping the time limit. Therefore, participants should have been motivated to
attain the time goal and experience time pressure.
Customer behaviour followed prescribed scripts which were consistent with the
specified sequence of questions that agents had to ask. The behaviour of customers was
manipulated in such a way that all six customer talks were either of a friendly or an
unfriendly nature. Friendly customers praised the quality of OTKOM products in three
talks, stating for example that the prices of OTKOM mobile phones are very reasonable.
In the other three conversations, they praised the agent, stating for example that they
never talked to a more competent agent before. Unfriendly customers complained
698
Ju¨rgen Wegge et al.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
about the low quality of OTKOM products in three calls and they insulted the call centre
agent in the other three talks (e.g. stating that the mobile phones are garbage or that the
call centre agent is incompetent). The sequence of these talks was counterbalanced
across communication conditions so that the statements regarding OTKOM products
and the personality of agents occurred with the same frequency in the first block of talks
(talks 1–3) and the second block of talks (talks 4–6).
Task
All customer calls started with a welcome note presented on the computer screen that
agents should read out. Then, agents always had to ask for the customer’s name and their
number or their date of birth if they were new. Next, agents had to check whether the
customer wished to order a mobile (order talk), needed information about an OTKOM
product (information talk) or had a complaint about products (complaint talk). Each
participant conducted two of these different types of talks in a fixed sequence so that
each type of talk was present in both blocks (talks 1–3 and 4–6). The contents of the six
talks were different (e.g. customers always presented different names and complaints)
and the structure of the three talks also varied. In an order talk, for example the agent
had to check which phone should be send, how the customer would like to pay (invoice
or credit card), ask for the shipping addresses and whether the customer wants more
information about OTKOM products. All calls ended with a farewell note presented on
the computer screen that agents should read out.
Equipment
Conversations with customers were conducted using a pc-based (desktop)
videoconference system (Zydacron OnWan 350) that utilizes LAN connections between
computers (transfer 768 kbps). The connection (via IP address) was built between two
separate labs located near each other, with a time delay between both stations about 1
second. The video display (30 fps) was presented on a 17 inch SVGA colour monitor
with a small digital camera mounted on top of the screen in conditions with a
videoconference. Headsets were always used for transmission of audio signals. Within
those connections where video data were available, only the picture of the customer
was visible on the right part of the computer screen (size approx. 4.5 £ 5.5 inch; no
picture of the agent). The program for handling the communication sequence was
presented on the left part of the screen.
Measures
The constructs in this study were assessed via observation by the experimenters, by
analysing salvia, by self-reports of participants obtained with several questionnaires at
specific times during the experiment and by analysing video data.
Observation by the experimenter
For each customer talk, the experimenters playing the customers judged on a special
sheet immediately after a talk, the time needed for the talk and the participants
performance. Performance was defined as adherence to the prescribed communication
scripts. The two experimenters noted each substantial deviation from the script (e.g. a
deviation would be that agents forget to ask for a shipping address or to give a farewell
Customer-induced stress in call centre work
699
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
note). Both experimenters controlled each other with respect to these measures and
there was no disagreement. Based on this data, the total amount of deviations from
communication scripts across all six talks was computed. This variable is considered as a
cumulative performance index (range was between 0 and 17, M ¼ 2
:76, SD ¼ 3:45).
Salvia samples (IgA)
In order to obtain saliva of sufficient volume for the IgA-analysis, the Sarstedt Salivette
was used. It contains a dental roll in a tube that can be centrifuged to extract the saliva
from the cotton. Participants were asked three times during the course of the
experiment (see above) to take a dental roll and to place it in their mouth for exactly
2 minutes. This constant time method is sufficient to control for saliva flow (Kugler,
1990). It has been shown that IgA-levels do not correlate with saliva volume (Vogt, 1998,
p. 97) and that IgA effects are independent of saliva flow (Bristow, Hucklebridge, Clow,
& Evans, 1997). After the experiment, the samples were deep-frozen at
2 208C. On the
day of analyses, they were defrosted and centrifuged by 2,000 cycles per minute for
3 minutes. IgA was determined using low-level radial immune diffusion endoplates
(method by Mancini, Carbonara, & Heremans, 1965, adopted for saliva according to
Kugler, 1990). It was expected that IgA-levels (mg/dl) increase under acute stress
(Kugler, 1994). We selected IgA as an indicator of acute arousal as it was shown before
that IgA increases under strain in a similar way as cortisol (Evans, Bristow, Hucklebridge,
Clow, & Pang, 1994). Various studies (reviewed by Evans, Clow, & Hucklebridge, 1997)
have revealed acute IgA rises in short-term tasks where arousal (i.e. activation of the
sympathetic-adrenal-medullary system) dominated over psychological stress (cortisol
secretion). Moreover, IgA was preferred over cortisol because it is less influenced by
circadian rhythms. Both cortisol (Klußmann et al., 2005) and IgA (Hagemann, Vogt,
Mauss, & Kalveram, 2000) show a peak in the early morning. While salivary cortisol
peaks were also found 45 minutes after awakening, at noon, in the afternoon and
evening, no such peaks were found in a 16-hour day for IgA (Hagemann et al., 2000).
Late afternoon IgA values, however, were found to be lower than early morning values in
the study of Tzai-Li and Gleeson (2004).
Variables assessed with questionnaires
Participants answered various questionnaires during the course of the experiment that
were constructed, in part, on the basis of several prior validated scales. After each of the
six talks with customers, participants answered a one page mood checklist.
The following four variables were measured with this checklist. Emotional Dissonance
was assessed with four items selected from the corresponding subscale of the Frankfurt
Emotion Work Scales (FEWS, see Zapf, Vogt, Seifert, Mertini, & Isic, 1999). These items
were slightly changed so that a repetition after each talk was possible. An example item
is: ‘How often did you display emotions that were not in correspondence with real
feelings?’. The reliability of this scale was good at all six points of measurement
(
a ¼
:84–:90) in this study. The mean value across the six measurement points was used
for later data analysis. Participants further answered three bipolar questions regarding
their actual mood after each talk. The first question referred to Mood Valence (from
unpleasant to pleasant), the second question concerned Activation (from calm to
excite) and the third question asked for Tiredness (from awake to tired). Prior research
has shown that these three mood dimensions describe largely independent aspects of
700
Ju¨rgen Wegge et al.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
human moods (see for example Schimmak, 1999). In support of this assumption, a
principal component factor analysis comprising all available mood items suggested a
three-factor solution (eigenvalues
. 1 were 6.1, 2.7 and 2.3) explaining 61% of the
variance. According to the rotated matrix of the three-factor solution (varimax rotation),
all items solely showed substantial loadings on their corresponding factor. Therefore, we
built three corresponding scales for measuring the three mood dimensions.
The reliability of these measures was good as the intercorrelations across the six
points of measurement were consistently high. For mood valence, the correlations were
in the range of
:36 , r , :59 (all p , :01; if the six measures are considered as a scale,
a ¼
:77). The corresponding correlations for activation are in the range of :30 , r , :57
(all p ,
:01; a ¼ :79) and for tiredness :47 , r , :92 (all p , :01, a ¼ :92).
Time Pressure was assessed by self-report as a manipulation check after the six calls
with customers were finished. Participants answered three questions, for example: ‘I
felt under high time pressure’. The reliability of this scale that was developed for this
study was good (
a ¼
:77). Finally, Customer Friendliness was assessed as a further
manipulation check after calls 3 and 6. We used the subscale ‘disliked customers’ which
consists of four items, for example ‘Customers were hostile’. This scale was developed
within a broader context by Dormann and Zapf (2004) and also had a good reliability at
both sampling points in our study (
a ¼
:89). The mean of the two measurements was
used for data analysis. For all scales, participants had to evaluate the items on five-point
answering scales. For the three mood scales, the verbal anchors were mentioned above.
For the other items, these endpoints were 1 ¼ ‘strongly disagree’ to 5 ¼ ‘strongly
agree’; 1 ¼ ‘very little’ to 5 ¼ ‘a great deal’, or 1 ¼ ‘not at all’ to 5 ¼ ‘most of the time’.
Items were coded in such a way (e.g. recoded for customer dislike) that high values
always indicated high values of the corresponding construct.
Video data
Two trained raters who were blind with respect to the experimental hypotheses judged
various aspects of the behaviour of participants using ‘The Observer 4.0’ program. The
following variables were analysed for all six calls with customers. It was coded (a) how
often agents showed a smile, (b) how often agents were laughing and (c) how long
agents were talking (or not talking) with customers during the communication period.
In addition, it was determined (d) how often agents verbally agreed with customers
(e.g. by saying ‘yes’ or ‘okay’) and (e) how often they indicated non-verbal agreement by
nodding. These variables were summed up across talks for later data analysis. In order to
examine the reliability of these measures, a randomly determined set of 10 participants
was coded by both raters. The inter-rater-reliability of these variables was high: Cohen’s
k ¼
:91 in this analysis. Therefore, the behaviour of agents was coded in a very
consistent and reliable manner by both raters.
Results
Descriptive statistics
Means, standard deviations, reliability estimates and correlations of main dependent
variables are presented in Table 1. In view of these results, it can be concluded that
all variables were assessed in a reliable way and that the various self-reports (e.g.
mood valence, activation, exhaustion, customer friendliness) and the various
Customer-induced stress in call centre work
701
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
T
able
1.
Means,
stand
ar
d
d
e
viations,
corr
elations
and
reliability
estimates
(in
par
enthesis)
of
central
variables
MS
D
1
2
3
4
5678
9
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
3
1.
Sex
1
.56
.49
(–)
2.
Age
29.84
9.93
.07
(–)
3.
P
erformance
(err
ors)
2.76
3.45
.16
2
.11
(1.0)
4.
IgA-I
(baseline)
23.64
12.33
2
.11
2
.06
2
.14
(–)
5.
Emotional
dissonance
2.08
.78
2
.18
2
.08
.05
.07
(.84)
6.
Mood
valence
3.28
.86
.22*
.06
2
.07
2
.16
2
.67**
(.77)
7.
Activation
3.10
.68
.05
2
.04
.06
.22*
.13
2
.26**
(.79)
8.
Tir
edness
2.54
.95
.03
2
.06
.15
.06
.29**
2
.36**
.34**
(.92)
9.
Customer
friendliness
3.43
1.25
.26**
.18
2
.23*
.04
2
.71**
.69**
2
.08
2
.28**
(.89)
10.
Smiling
17.42
12.07
2
.20
.13
2
.20*
2
.06
.02
.12
2
.19
.02
.04
(.91)
11.
Laughing
4.49
4.45
.04
.36**
2
.09
.01
2
.17
.26**
2
.04
2
.18
.30**
.17
(.91)
12.
T
alking
(seconds)
428
139
.30**
.12
.09
.03
2
.18
.29**
2
.01
2
.09
.26**
.03
.27**
(1.0)
13.
V
erbal
agr
eement
66.49
28.72
.29**
.29**
2
.20*
.06
2
.22*
.22*
.15
.00
.36**
.06
.26**
.50**
(.91)
14.
Non
verbal
agr
eement
9.31
10.27
2
.07
.15
2
.18
2
.15
2
.19
.23*
.02
.01
.21*
.30*
.06
.11
.09
(91)
Note
.
*
#
.05,
**
#
.01;
N
¼
94
–
9
6
due
to
single
missing
values;
1
male
¼
0,
female
¼
1.
702
Ju¨rgen Wegge et al.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
behaviours of participants observed in this study (e.g. smiling, laughing, talking)
represent different phenomena.
Manipulation checks
Due to the random assignment of participants to experimental conditions, sex, age and
prior work experiences are not systematically linked to experimental factors (all p .
:10).
We conducted additional manipulation checks with respect to the impact of our
experimental procedures regarding time pressure and customer behaviour. Table 2
documents the related results. It was found, as expected, that communication times were
significantly shorter in conditions of time pressure (the comparison for vc vs. vc plus time
pressure is significant with tð90Þ ¼ 3
:67, p , :01). Moreover, time pressure was also
reported to be higher in corresponding conditions (this contrast is significant with
tð90Þ ¼ 2
:49, p , :01). Only 3 out of the 37 participants in both conditions with time
pressure did not earn a bonus. On an average, agents earned additionally 4.3e when serving
friendly customers and 4.1e when serving rude customers under time pressure. Overall,
these results clearly indicate that the manipulation to induce time pressure was effective.
The manipulation of customer behaviour did also work as expected (see Table 2) as
customers with rude behaviour were judged to be much less friendly than customers who
were polite (Fð1
; 90Þ ¼ 293:74, p , :01, h
2
¼
:75). Taken together, it can be concluded
that both experimental manipulations had strong main effects as predicted. The side-effects
of both manipulations (rude customer increase perceptions of time pressure; high time-
pressure enhances the perception of customer unfriendliness) were not problematic for
testing our hypotheses because no interaction was statistically significant.
Group comparisons for testing the hypotheses
To test the hypotheses, two MANOVAS were conducted. In the first MANOVA, salvia data
were analysed. In this analysis, the time of measurement was treated as a repeated
measurement factor in combination with both experimental factors (see Table 2). The
second MANOVA examined the remaining dependent variables (see Table 2). In both
MANOVAS, we used Helmert-contrasts for analysing the impact of the experimental
factor ‘communication condition’. This form of contrast is appropriate because it
compares (a) the first group (phone) to the remaining groups (the mean of both
vc-conditions; this reveals differences due to using a videoconference) and (b) the
second group (vc) to the last group (vc with time pressure; this reveals differences due
to time pressure). It should be noted that this form of contrast does not represent a post
hoc comparison as H2 and H3 require testing exactly these differences
1
. In addition, the
overall F-value of the factor ‘communication mode’ or the F-value of the interaction
between both experimental factors is not a valid test of hypotheses in this design as this
value is an average of both underlying group contrasts (phone vs. both vc-conditions and
vc vs. vc with time pressure). Therefore, these F-values are not reported.
1
It can be argued that for some tests solely the conditions phone vs. vc should be compared (thereby loosing statistical power
but being strict with excluding potential effects of time pressure that were only present within vc-conditions). Therefore, we
conducted two additional MANOVAs without the condition VC þ time pressure. The findings are almost identical with two
exceptions. There is (a) no longer a significant decrease in IgA from time 2 to time 3 (p ,
:22) and (b) the increase in showing
verbal agreement due to using a vc becomes significant with Fð1
; 58Þ ¼ 4:35, p , :04). As these differences are minor and
understandable, we solely present the results based on the Helmert contrasts.
Customer-induced stress in call centre work
703
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
T
able
2.
Manipulation
checks,
salivar
y
IgA,
experimenter
obser
vation
and
self-r
epor
t
Phone
friendly
Phone
rude
VC
friendly
VC
rude
VC
þ
time
friendly
VC
þ
time
rude
Communication
1
Interaction
1
M
(SD
)
M
(SD
)
M
(SD
)
M
(SD
)
M
(SD
)
M
(SD
)
C
ustomer
beha
viour
1
P-VC
VC-VC
þ
P-VC
VC-VC
þ
Manipulation
checks
Communication
(seconds)
912
(135)
872
(163)
986
(208)
996
(162)
840
(97)
863
(129)
3.67**
Time
pr
essur
e
.71
(.87)
1.67
(.96)
.49
(.45)
1.75
(.96)
1.37
(1.15)
2.06
(.99)
24.6**
2.49**
Customer
friendliness
4.70
(.35)
2.28
(.94)
4.68
(.30)
2.45
(.76)
4.18
(.57)
2.33
(.50)
293.7**
2.12*
Salivar
y
IgA-le
vels
(mg/dl)
2
IgA-I
22.4
(13.6)
23.6
(8.9)
22.6
(12.5)
18.5
(8.7)
28.0
(17.2)
24.7
(9.6)
2.16*
3
IgA-II
32.1
(22.9)
30.7
(.96)
27.1
(11.9)
23.3
(17.4)
36.4
(24.2)
31.6
(22.0)
1.79
þ
3
IgA-III
30.5
(20.0)
27.6
(15.2)
25.4
(15.9)
20.6
(8.4)
28.4
(11.6)
25.9
(14.7)
Obser
vation
and
Self-Report
P
erformance
(err
ors)
1.62
(1.7)
3.94
(5.1)
2.47
(4.4)
4.56
(3.6)
1.12
(1.2)
2.94
(1.9)
9.41**
1.79
þ
Emotional
dissonance
1.39
(.44)
2.65
(.70)
1.38
(.35)
2.62
(.65)
1.92
(.51)
2.49
(.69)
76.38**
2
2.31*
Mood
valence
3.94
(.75)
2.69
(.54)
4.13
(.66)
2.85
(.56)
3.53
(.67)
2.58
(.53)
82.11**
2.78**
Activation
2.65
(.80)
3.09
(.45)
3.27
(.76)
3.07
(.65)
3.39
(.69)
3.17
(.52)
2
2.46*
2
2.31*
Tir
edness
1.86
(.86)
2.83
(.94)
2.50
(1.1)
2.69
(.64)
2.51
(.94)
2.88
(.91)
7.47**
Smiling
14.4
(11.1)
14.7
(10.8)
18.9
(13.3)
20.1
(11.2)
18.6
(14.7)
18.2
(11.2)
2
1.67
þ
Laughing
6.06
(4.5)
3.44
(.4.5)
5.40
(4.3)
3.33
(3.9)
5.35
(5.1)
3.31
(3.9)
6.09*
T
alking
(seconds)
461
(153)
387
(119)
520
(171)
452
(143)
391
(107)
369
(90)
3.97*
3.14**
V
erbal
agree
ment
70.3
(20.9)
49.9
(19.7)
87.4
(33.5)
58.0
(17.9)
72.9
(36.5)
60.7
(25.9)
14.04**
2
1.66
þ
Non
verbal
agr
eement
13.4
(10.7)
3.5
(3.9)
11.7
(12.8)
9.5
(11.5)
9.0
(9.6)
8.9
(9.6)
3.95*
1.99*
Notes
.
P-VC
¼
Helmer
t
contrast
phone
vs.
mean
of
both
vc-conditions;
VC-VC
þ¼
Helmert
contrast
vc
vs.
vc
plus
time
pr
essur
e;
*p
,
:05,
**
p
,
:01;
1
Significant
F-values
ar
e
p
resented
for
the
experimental
factor
‘customer
beha
viour’
and
significant
t-values
ar
e
shown
for
Helmert
contrasts
(P-VC
and
VC-VC
þ
);
2
N
¼
92
due
to
single
missing
saliva
data,
time
1
vs.
time
2/time
3
F
ð1
;
86
Þ¼
11
:53
**
h
2
¼
:12,
time
2
vs.
time
3
F
ð1
;
86
Þ¼
6:
12
**
,h
2
¼
:07;
3
These
effects
relate
to
the
single
time
of
measur
ement:
if
time
1
and
time
2
ar
e
consider
ed
simultaneously
the
contrast
is
significant
with
tð
87
Þ¼
2:
15,
p
,
:03.
704
Ju¨rgen Wegge et al.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Test of H1
This hypothesis concerns the impact of customer behaviour on the intensity of
emotions, strain and behaviour of agents. It was expected (H1a) that compared with
friendly customers, the behaviour of unfriendly customers leads to more intense
emotions and strain. This hypothesis is corroborated by the data with respect to the
variables mood valence, tiredness and emotional dissonance (see Table 2). However,
the self-reported degree of activation and IgA-levels were not systematically increased by
the unfriendliness of customers. This is probably due to the fact that both variables are
rather broad, unspecific measures of activation (arousal) that do not always differentiate
between positive and negative stimuli. We come back to this point.
In support of H1b, it was found that the friendliness of the service and the
performance quality of agents (defined as errors in adhering to the communication
script) were significantly lower if customers were unfriendly. Participants talked less,
laughed less often and showed less verbal and non-verbal agreement when customers
were unfriendly. Only the frequency of smiling was not affected by this manipulation.
Taken together, this pattern of findings clearly indicates that unfriendly customer
behaviour increases strain and lowers task performance of agents.
Test of H2
This hypothesis focuses on potential effects linked to the experimental factor
‘communication condition’. The first part of this hypothesis (H2a) was not supported by
the data when compared with an audio interaction, the availability of video data did not
lead to more intensive emotions or more strain. There was no significant effect of the
corresponding Helmert-contrast (phone vs. mean of vc-conditions) for the IgA-level, for
emotional dissonance, for mood valence or feelings of tiredness. However, self-reported
activation levels are higher in both vc-conditions (see Table 2). As this effect is further
qualified by a two-way interaction indicating that higher activation levels induced by
videoconferencing are only found if customers are friendly, this result does not indicate
a potential disadvantage of using videoconferencing for communication with
customers. To the contrary, it could be argued that only seeing a friendly customer
increases activation and that this makes the otherwise often boring job of call centre
agents more interesting. We come back to this point in the discussion.
Hypothesis 2b focuses on potential differences with respect to the expression of
positive emotions (laughing, smiling, showing agreement). As documented in Table 2, this
hypothesis found some support in the data. Adding video data in conversations with
customers did not change the frequency of laughing of participants, but it increased the
frequency of smiling and the frequency of showing verbal agreement with customers.
The observed differences are in the predicted direction with a near miss of statistical
significance (p
, .10, see also Footnote 1). With respect to showing non-verbal
agreement, a significant interaction of experimental factors was found. Non-verbal
agreement (nodding) was more often observed in vc-communication when compared
with conversations via phone but this difference is only found if customer behaviour was
rude. Therefore, it is likely that this type of behaviour was deliberately used by participants
in vc-conditions to calm down aggressive customers. Taken together, H2b found some
support in this study. There is evidence, as expected, that the specific communication
condition changes the expression of positive emotions and behaviour indicating
agreement with another person. However, these effects were not very strong and/or
depend on the presence of some other conditions (having to talk to rude customers).
Customer-induced stress in call centre work
705
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Test of H3
With respect to the manipulation of time pressure (H3a), it was expected that adding time
pressure in a videoconference leads to higher strain of agents and less talking with
customers. This part of the hypothesis is supported by the data as talking was reduced in
these conditions (see Table 2) and IgA-levels were also significantly higher in conditions
with time pressure. This was already the case at sampling point 1 (tð88Þ ¼ 22
:16,
p ,
:04, see Table 2). The further results regarding IgA-levels indicate that the whole
simulation of call centre work was taxing for participants. IgA-levels significantly
increased from baseline to sampling point 2 (Fð1
; 86Þ ¼ 11:53, p , :01, h
2
¼
:12) and
decreased significantly at the end of the experiment (Fð1
; 86Þ ¼ 6:11, p , :02, see also
Footnote 1), probably because participant’s tension was reduced when the experiment
was finished. An additional MANOVA that examined solely IgA-levels from time 1 and time
2 (where strain should be induced by experimental manipulations) once again revealed
that the condition with time pressure caused the largest IgA efflux (see Table 2). It should
be noted that inducing time pressure within a videoconference further had a marginally
significant impact on performance (agents made fewer errors) and also changed the mood
of agents (the mood was less positive under high time-pressure; see Table 2). The second
part of H3 relates to potential interactions between customer friendliness and time
pressure. It was expected that the negative effect of time pressure on strain is amplified if
customers are rude. This idea is not supported by the results as there was no
corresponding interaction (vc vs. vc plus time pressure) for IgA-levels, mood valence or
tiredness. However, there is a significant interaction for emotional dissonance (Table 2).
Interestingly, if agents can see friendly customers, time pressure leads to higher
emotional dissonance. One possible explanation is the following: if agents want to hurry-
up in order to keep a time limit, friendly customers are most problematic because agents
have to suppress sympathy for these customers and motivation to talk with them.
Discussion
Computer-mediated communication within- and between-organizations becomes more
and more common. Therefore, researchers have started to analyse the various factors
that make this type of communication different from traditional forms of
communication. The purpose of our study was to contribute to this research by
investigating if and how the work of call centre agents and the immediate impact of this
work on well-being of agents are changed if communication with customers is
conducted via videoconference. In analysing this issue, we attempted to construct an
ecologically valid simulation of this work with experienced call centre agents and
examined not only the impact of adding video data but also the effect of two further
common stressors in call centres: the presence of time pressure and verbal aggressions
towards agents. The results of our experiment are important in several ways.
First, we were able to demonstrate that inducing time pressure in communication
with customers raised IgA-levels in salvia. Moreover, talking-times were reduced, mood
of agents was less positive and there was also a marginally significant effect regarding
performance of agents as fewer errors were made under high time-pressure. Taken
together, all these differences show that agents focused their attention on the task and
were aroused by the underlying manipulation. This finding might be interpreted as
evidence that corresponding goals of management in call centres (e.g. to have a fast,
high-quality service) can be achieved by offering financial incentives to agents for
706
Ju¨rgen Wegge et al.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
serving customers quickly. However, we did not measure customer satisfaction because
no real customers were involved in our study. In addition, time pressure was solely
induced in conditions where agents had a videoconference as we were interested to
examine the potential additive effects of both manipulations when agents and customer
can see each other. Therefore, drawing the conclusion that inducing time pressure will
increase performance of agents or customer satisfaction in typical call centre work is
not warranted. Moreover, we should also note that the moods of agents were negatively
affected and customers were experienced to be more unfriendly in our study if time
pressure was high. While acute time pressure increases IgA and might improve attention
and performance, it can also lead to chronic stress and lower IgA-levels in the long run
(Henningsen et al., 1992; Kugler, 1994). In this case, the immune system’s integrity is
threatened and the susceptibility to upper respiratory tract infections is enhanced
( Jemmott & McClelland, 1989; Schaubroeck, Jones, & Xie, 2001) with a higher
probability of non-productive times of agents. In view of these findings, we propose that
more research on the long-term health costs of time pressure in call centre work is
needed. This should involve more than one physiological measure used in the reported
experiment, especially as IgA can be seen as both, a measure of acute arousal in the short
term and an index of immune system integrity in the long run.
Second, we found in support of recent theories of emotion work (Dormann & Zapf,
2004; Grandey, 2000; Zapf, 2002) that customer behaviour has to be considered a
stressor in call centre work. There were several substantial effects linked to the
manipulation of customer behaviour and all of these findings indicate that compared
with friendly customers, rude customer behaviour promotes strain (e.g. bad mood,
emotional dissonance) and reduces well-being of agents. It was also found that the
customers have to pay for their aggression with a lower quality of service by the agent.
The only point that seems to contradict this consistent pattern of findings is that IgA-
levels and self-reports of activation were not raised if customers were rude. However,
these measures mainly indicate unspecific arousal. Prior research has documented that
IgA-levels correlate with the actual and perceived workload (Zeier, Brauchli, & Joller-
Jemelka, 1996) but not necessarily with the specific emotional state (Endresen et al.,
1991). Therefore, this deviation is understandable and does not contradict the general
conclusion that unfriendly customers are considerable stressors in call centre work.
Third and most importantly, we found contrary to our expectations that the availability
of video data did not simply enhance strain of agents. There was no single main effect in the
data indicating that establishing a videoconference between agents and customers is more
taxing for agents than having a phone-to-phone connection only. In other words, hearing a
rude (polite) customer is as effective in annoying (pleasing) call centre agents as hearing
and seeing the customer in the same situation. The total absence of any strong negative
effects of the availability of video data is surprising. Perhaps, we simply underestimated the
power of the spoken word in eliciting emotional reactions. No effects of visual information
were also found by O’Malley, Langton, Anderson, Doherty-Sneddon, and Bruce (1996) for
the performance of dyads working on a problem-solving task, by Harmon, Schneer, and
Hoffman (1995) in a comparison of group decisions derived ftf or via audioconference, and
also by Day and Schneider (2002) in investigating the effect of a medical treatment in a field
study. Consistent with these findings, there is also evidence that anonymity does not always
make the interaction less social (e.g. see Postmes & Spears, 2002). Therefore, a strong and
simple link between the media used for communication and the strain that might result in
this situation is probably not existent. The only disadvantage of having video data observed
in our study was that emotional dissonance might be increased if time pressure is high and
Customer-induced stress in call centre work
707
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
customers are polite. Emotional dissonance linked to suppressing or overplaying positive
emotions is only recently discussed in research on emotional labour (see Glomb & Tews,
2004; Wegge, van Dick, & Wecking, 2006). The preliminary evidence regarding this
phenomenon shows that this form of emotional dissonance is less problematic for the well-
being of service providers. However, as discussed in more detail in the next section, we
believe that replications of these results are needed before it is concluded that there are no
negative effects of videoconferencing in call centre work. Extending this database could be
very fruitful as the data of our study also show that videoconferencing increased activation if
customers were friendly. Higher levels of activation can counteract boredom, a common
problem in call centre work. In addition, smiling to customers and showing verbal
agreement tended to be more pronounced in a videoconference. As customers often prefer
to see service providers (Finn et al., 1997; Wegge & Bipp, 2004) and because the social
presence of agents should be increased in a videoconference, adding videoconference
facilities in call centres could be an option for both enriching this type of work and making it
more effective if the absence of negative effects is confirmed in future studies.
Limitations and future directions
This study has several limitations that might be addressed in further research. First, it
should be noted that we simulated call centre work in a laboratory. While conducting a
study in a laboratory, context has several advantages (e.g. a precise analysis of differences
in customer behaviour and communication procedures, the use of various measures) and
also has limitations. We do not know, for example whether the phenomena examined in a
short-term setting like this can be generalized to behaviour of employees at the workplace
where work is organized in 8-hour shifts. However, the participants in our study were
experienced call centre agents. Moreover, the experimental procedures were designed to
simulate call centre work in a realistic context with typical tasks and manipulation checks
indicated that these procedures were effective. In addition, during debriefing, the
experimenter always asked how realistic participants judged the simulated scenario.
Almost all call centre agents attested this simulation a high degree of realism (e.g. with
respect to the type of talks, the presence of scripted communication and the
corresponding computer program). However, five agents mentioned during debriefing
that customers are typically not so friendly and three agents mentioned that customers are
typically not so unfriendly. Therefore, the sequence of calls we used in our simulation was
indeed somehow untypical. However, 88 agents did not mention this point. Moreover, we
decided to keep this factor constant within agents as many other problems arise (e.g.
sequence effects) if a more variable order of friendly and unfriendly customers is used. Of
course, it would be interesting to conduct further studies in which more complex
sequences of friendly and unfriendly customer behaviour are enacted (e.g. in an
experiment) or observed (e.g. in field studies).
Second, it should be noted that we videotaped the behaviour of all participants in
this study with a distant camera. The visible camera on top of the computer screen was
used only in the vc conditions and there is evidence for the effectiveness of this
manipulation (e.g. agents felt and behaved differently with or without this camera).
However, it is not clear how the level of self-awareness and the behaviour of agents were
influenced by the constant availability of the distant camera. Therefore, further studies
without this limitation might be interesting, in particular, if additional measures with
respect to the degree of self-awareness are assessed, too.
708
Ju¨rgen Wegge et al.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Third, we should be also aware that potentially influential factors for strain reactions
of agents were not manipulated, for example technical parameters of the
videoconference, such as the bandwidth of data transfer, the size of the picture of the
customer, the availability of the own picture of agents or the occurrence of technical
problems that are still a common problem in videoconferences (see for example Wegge,
2006). Future research should address also this lacuna by examining the impact of these
factors. In the same vein, we should note that participants were not familiar with
videoconferencing. Even though the experimenter explained the system and no
problems did occur during communication with customers’ reactions will probably
change with more experience in the use of this new communication technology (see
Webster, 1998, for a field study on this issue). Further studies should consider this and
other limitations (e.g. effects of inducing time pressure in phone-to-phone
communication with customers were not investigated).
Finally, we like to encourage practitioners as well as researchers to examine the
impact of videoconferencing in the regular work of call centre agents as there is now
first empirical evidence that adding video data in this type of work can have advantages.
In our study, there was no evidence for the problematic effects that we expected to find,
for example more strain due to the mere availability of video data or a substantial
enhancement of cumulative effects of stressors (e.g. if aggressive customers had to be
served under high time-pressure). It also remains open whether similar results will be
found if inter-individual differences in the personality of agents are considered. Based on
the research of Workman, Kahnweiler, and Bommer (2003) it can be expected, for
example that communication via videoconference is preferred more by individuals with
an external and global cognitive style.
Our study indicated that adding a videoconference in the routine work of call centre
agents seems to be rather a cure than a curse for most agents. Of course, there are many
other possibilities to increase work motivation and well-being in call centres, for
example by utilizing the motivating potential of work and organizational identification
(Holman, 2003; Wegge, van Dick, Fisher, Wecking, & Moltzen, 2006), by improving the
(interaction) control of agents (Zapf, 2002), or – and this statement is based on a study
with data from 2,091 agents working in 85 call centres in the UK – by promoting a
positive work climate (e.g. supervisory support, autonomy, participation of agents) and
reducing work overload (Wegge, van Dick, Fisher, West, & Dawson, 2006).
Nevertheless, offering videoconferencing in call centres might prove to be a new,
additional improvement. A promising way to examine this question further with little
risk would be to offer agents the choice to communicate with customers also via
videoconference.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (WE 1504/7-1). We
are grateful to Rolf van Dick, Kevin Daniels and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments
on earlier versions of this paper.
References
Blokland, A., & Anderson, A. H. (1998). Effect of low frame-rate video on intelligibility of speech.
Speech Communication, 26, 97–103.
Customer-induced stress in call centre work
709
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Bristow, M., Hucklebridge, F. H., Clow, A., & Evans, P. D. (1997). Modulation of secretory
immunoglobulin A in salvia in relation to an acute episode of stress and arousal. Journal of
Psychophysiology, 11, 248–255.
Bruce, V. (1996). The role of face in communication: Implications for videophone design.
Interacting with Computers, 8, 166–176.
Day, S. X., & Schneider, P. L. (2002). Psychotherapy using distance technology: A comparison of
face-to-face, video, and audio treatment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 499–503.
Deery, S., Iverson, R., & Walsh, J. (2002). Work relationships in telephone call centers:
Understanding emotional exhaustion and employee withdrawal. Journal of Management
Studies, 39, 471–496.
Dormann, C., & Zapf, D. (2004). Customer-related social stressors and burnout. Journal of
Occupational Health Psychology, 9, 61–82.
Endresen, I. M., Ellertsen, B., Endresen, C., Hjelman, A. M., Matre, R., & Ursin, H. (1991). Stress at
work and psychological and immunological parameters in a group of Norwegian female bank
employees. Work and Stress, 5, 217–227.
Evans, P., Bristow, M., Hucklebridge, F., Clow, A., & Pang, F. Y. (1994). Stress, arousal, cortisol and
secretory immunoglobulin A in students undergoing assessment. British Journal of Clinical
Psychology, 33, 575–576.
Evans, P., Clow, A., & Hucklebridge, F. (1997). Stress and the immune system. Psychologist July,
303–307.
Finn, K. E., Sellen, A. J., & Wilbur, S. B. (1997). Video-mediated communication. Mahwah:
Erlbaum.
Fischbach, A. (2003). Determinants of emotion work. Available at: http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/
diss/2003/fischbach/fischbach.pdf [25.11.2003].
Glomb, T. M., & Tews, M. J. (2004). Emotional labor: A conceptualization and scale development.
Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 1–23.
Grandey, A., Dickter, D., & Sin, H. -P. (2004). The customer is not always right: Customer verbal
aggression toward service employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 397–418.
Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotion regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize
emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 95–110.
Hagemann, T., Vogt, J., Mauss, I., & Kalveram, K. Th. (2000). Circadian rhythm of salvary
immunoglobulin A. Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 186.
Harmon, J., Schneer, J. A., & Hoffman, L. R. (1995). Electronic meetings and established decision
groups: Audioconferencing effects on performance and structural stability. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 138–147.
Henningsen, G. M., Hurrell, J. J., Baker, F., Douglas, C., MacKenzie, B. A., Robertson, S. K., et al.
(1992). Measurement of salivary immunoglobulin A as an immunologic biomarker of job
stress. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment, and Health, 18, 133–136.
Holman, D. (2003). Call centres. In D. Holman, T. D. Wall, C. W. Clegg, P. Sparrow, & A. Howard
(Eds.), The new workplace: A guide to the human impact of modern working practices
(pp. 115–134). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Jemmott, J. B., & McClelland, D. C. (1989). Secretory IgA as a measure of resistance to infectious
disease. Behavioral Medicine, 15, 63–71.
Klußmann, A., Gebhardt, H., Mu
¨ller, B. H., Maßbeck, P., Topp, S., Steinberg, U.,
et al. (2005).
Gestaltung gesundheitsfo
¨rderlicher Arbeitsbedingungen fu
¨r Rettungsdienstpersonal. [Health
promoting work conditions for paramedics]. Notfall and Rettungsmedizin, 8, 564–568.
Kugler, J. (1990). Filminduzierte A
¨nderung der emotionalen Befindlichkeit und Immunglobulin
A im Speichel. [Video-induced changes of emotional state and immunoglobulin A in saliva ].
Dissertation: Heinrich-Heine-Universita
¨t Du
¨sseldorf.
Kugler, J. (1994). Stress, salivary immunoglobulin A and susceptibility to upper respiratory tract
infection. Evidence for adaptive immunomodulation. Psychologische Beitra
¨ge, 36, 175–182.
Mancini, G., Carbonara, A. O., & Heremans, J. F. (1965). Immunochemical quantitation of antigens
by single radial immunodiffusion. Immunochemistry, 2, 235–254.
710
Ju¨rgen Wegge et al.
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Meier, C. (2000). Videokonferenzen [Videoconferencing]. In M. Boos, K. J. Jonas, & K. Sassenberg
(Eds.), Computervermittelte kommunikation in organisationen (pp. 153–164). Go
¨ttingen:
Hogrefe.
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2003). Human-Computer Interaction: Psychological aspects of the
human use of computing. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 491–516.
O’Malley, C., Langton, S., Anderson, A., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Bruce, V. (1996). Comparison of
face-to-face and video-mediated interaction. Interacting with Computers, 8, 177–192.
Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2002). Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication
reduce gender inequality? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1073–1083.
Purdy, M. J. (2000). The impact of communication media of negotiation outcomes. International
Journal of Conflict Management (online), 11, 162, 26p.
Schaubroeck, J., Jones, J. R., & Xie, J. L. (2001). Individual differences in utilizing control to cope
with job demands: Effects on susceptibility to infectious disease. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 86, 265–278.
Schimmak, U. (1999). Strukturmodelle von Stimmungen: Ru
¨ckschau, Rundschau und Ausschau.
[Structural models of mood: A review and outlook]. Psychologische Rundschau, 50, 69–89.
Short, J. A., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. New
York: Wiley.
Tanis, M. (2003). Cues to identity in CMC. The impact on person perceptions and subsequent
interaction outcomes. University of Amsterdam: Ipskamp.
Taylor, P., & Bain, P. (1999). An assembly line in the head: Work and employee relations in the call
centre. Industrial Relations Journal, 30, 101–117.
Tice, D. M., & Bratslavsky, E. (2000). Giving in to feel good: The place of emotion regulation in the
context of general self-control. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 149–159.
Totterdell, P., & Holman, D. (2003). Emotion regulation in customer service roles: Testing a model
of emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 55–73.
Tschan, F., Rochat, S., & Zapf, D. (2005). It’s not only clients: Studying emotion work with clients
and co-workers with an event-sampling approach. Journal of Occupational and
Organizational Psychology, 78, 195–220.
Tzai-Li, L., & Gleeson, M. (2004). The effect of single and repeated bouts of prolonged cycling and
circadian variation on saliva flow rate, immunoglobulin A and
a-amylase responses. Journal of
Sports Sciences, 22, 1015–1024.
Vogt, J. (1998). Psychophysiologische Beanspruchung von Fluglotsen [Psychophysical strain of
air traffic controller]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Dortmund, Germany.
Wallbott, H. G. (1998). Decoding emotions from facial expression: Recent developments and
findings. European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 191–232.
Webster, J. (1998). Desktop videoconferencing: Experiences of complete users, wary users and
non-users. MIS Quarterly, September, 257–286.
Wegge, J. (2006). Communication via videoconference: Emotional and cognitive consequences of
affective personality dispositions, seeing one’s own picture and disturbing events. Human
Computer Interaction, 21, 273–318.
Wegge, J., & Bipp, T. (2004). Videokonferenzen in Organisationen: Chancen, Risiken und
personalpsychologisch relevante Anwendungsfelder [Videoconferences in organizations
Chances, risks and relevant applications for personnel psychology]. Zeitschrift fu
¨r
Personalpsychologie, 3, 95–111.
Wegge, J., Bipp, T., & Kleinbeck, U. (2007). Goal setting via videoconference. European Journal
of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 169–194.
Wegge, J., van Dick, R., Fisher, G. K., Wecking, C., & Moltzen, K. (2006). Work motivation,
organizational identification and well-being in call center work. Work and Stress, 20, 60–83.
Wegge, J., van Dick, R., Fisher, G. K., West, M., & Dawson, J. F. (2006). A test of basic assumptions
of Affective Events Theory (AET) in call centre work. British Journal of Management, 17,
237–254.
Customer-induced stress in call centre work
711
Copyright © The British Psychological Society
Reproduction in any form (including the internet) is prohibited without prior permission from the Society
Wegge, J., van Dick, R., & Wecking, C. (2006). Emotional dissonance in call center work: A closer
inspection of correlates and emotional underpinnings. Manuscript submitted for
publication.
Workman, M., Kahnweiler, W., & Bommer, W. (2003). The effects of cognitive style and media
richness on commitment to telework and virtual teams. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63,
199–219.
Wicklund, R. A. (1979). The influence of self-awareness on human behavior. American Scientist,
67, 187–193.
Zapf, D. (2002). Emotion work and psychological well-being. A review of the literature and some
conceptual considerations. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 237–268.
Zapf, D., Vogt, C., Seifert, C., Mertini, H., & Isic, A. (1999). Emotion work as a source of stress. The
concept and development of an instrument. European Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology, 8, 371–400.
Zeier, H., Brauchli, P., & Joller-Jemelka, H. I. (1996). Effects of work demands on immunoglobulin
A and cortisol in air traffic controllers. Biological Psychology, 42, 413–423.
Received 14 September 2004; revised version received 21 October 2006
712
Ju¨rgen Wegge et al.