America (And The World)
Faces Genuine
Energy/Electricity Challenges
America (And The World)
Faces Genuine
Energy/Electricity Challenges
Global WINDPOWER 2004
Chicago, Illinois
March 31, 2004
Presented By:
Matthew R. Simmons
Global WINDPOWER 2004
Chicago, Illinois
March 31, 2004
Presented By:
Matthew R. Simmons
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
Renewable Energy Soon To
Be Urgently Needed
Renewable Energy Soon To
Be Urgently Needed
n
For years, renewable energy
was “clean energy luxury.”
n
Fossil fuels are now running
into limits to growth.
n
It is now critical that renewable energy users
understand their own limits to growth.
n
The future for wind must be bright.
n
The challenges might also be awesome.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
The Nub Of The Problem:
We Face An Energy Crisis
The Nub Of The Problem:
We Face An Energy Crisis
n
Future growth in electricity demand needs
to shift from total reliance on natural gas.
n
Shift to oil does not work.
n
Coal and nuclear capacity now
approximately 100%.
n
U.S. energy demand has to grow for U.S.
to prosper.
n
Problems to grow energy use: domestic oil
and natural gas supply are both in decline.
n
The U.S. (and world) need a real
substitution for both in order for demand to
grow.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
Energy Is The Heart And
Soul Of Our Economy
Energy Is The Heart And
Soul Of Our Economy
n
Petroleum creates our transportation.
n
Natural gas creates our “heat”.
n
Electricity is used in industrial, residential and
commercial.
n
For economy to prosper, electricity must grow.
n
All future growth was supposed to happen
through natural gas.
n
This assumption was wrong.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
America’s Electricity Is “Mother’s
Milk” To Our Prosperity
America’s Electricity Is “Mother’s
Milk” To Our Prosperity
n
A pearl in America’s prosperity has been our electric grid.
n
To grow U.S. GDP, electricity
must grow.
n
We became one of few country’s
to be totally electrified.
n
Blackouts were what Third World
countries suffered.
n
To avoid blackouts, electricity generation and transmission
need to exceed electricity demand.
n
While electricity was totally regulated, need to know
electricity was limited.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
America’s Electricity Model Was Flawed
America’s Electricity Model Was Flawed
n
People assumed demand growth was waning.
n
Electricity deregulation would make industry
“efficient”.
n
Electricity could be wheeled from “coast to coast”.
n
1,000 KW of capacity creates power for 1,000 homes.
n
It was safe to use one form of feedstock (natural gas)
to fuel all future growth.
All assumptions were wrong!
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
Electricity Demand Is Still Growing
Electricity Demand Is Still Growing
n
Historical demand facts:
–
1973 - 2002: 2.7% per annum growth
–
1998 - 2002: 1.6% per annum growth
n
Slowdown was primarily mild weather driven.
–
Average monthly use (1998) = 291,000 MMKW
–
Peak use (Summer 2002) = 381,500 MMKW
n
Electricity growth parallels GDP growth in normal
weather.
n
If electricity growth stopped, so would GDP.
+31% or
7% per annum
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
Electricity Deregulation Was Flawed
Electricity Deregulation Was Flawed
n
Wheeling electricity assumes
neighboring states do not share
same peak weather uses.
n
As wheeling grows in distance,
yield losses soar.
n
Deregulation used up
“reserve margins”.
n
Free markets never intentionally create cushion (called
reserve margins).
n
Electricity capacity is still tied to peak needs, not average
needs.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
“1,000 KW Creates Power For 1,000
Homes” Was Wrong
“1,000 KW Creates Power For 1,000
Homes” Was Wrong
n
If true, America would only need 300,000 MW
generating capacity.
–
110 million homes use 35% of U.S. power.
–
U.S. has 950,000 MW of total power capacity.
n
This standard was probably true 40 years ago.
n
Today, it understates generation needs by
two-thirds.
n
Or generation added only fuels one-third as
many homes as expected.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
In 1999, America Began A
Power-Adding Binge
In 1999, America Began A
Power-Adding Binge
n
1990’s: Long standing habit of expanding
power capacity ground to a halt.
n
Summer of 1999: 29 different blackouts /
brownouts.
n
America then went on a “Power Buying Spree”.
n
220,000 MW added by end of 2003.
n
98% was gas-fired power plants.
n
America bets its future onto natural gas.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
Some Think America Created
A Power Glut
Some Think America Created
A Power Glut
n
Many energy experts now assume
America created massive power glut.
n
August 2003 blackout happened on
only extremely muggy day.
n
Late February 2003 bitter weather sent
power prices to $400 to 1,000 KW/hour
across the U.S.
Simulated photo. Not true representation of the
August 2003 blackout.
n
If we have too much generating capacity, we forgot to
de-bottleneck transmission.
n
Spare capacity needs to be approximately 35% to 50%.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
America’s Bet On Natural Gas Was
Sound (If Supply Had Worked)
America’s Bet On Natural Gas Was
Sound (If Supply Had Worked)
n
Natural gas was a safe
economic bet.
–
Most efficient way to create
kilowatts.
–
Cheapest cost to build
generating capacity.
–
Cleanest form of fossil fuel.
–
Only form that turns on instantly.
n
The bet was essential.
–
All other forms operate at
effective 100% capacity.
–
Nuclear and coal take days to turn on.
Image courtesy of World Energy.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
Supply Constraints Made The Bet Bad
Supply Constraints Made The Bet Bad
n
NPC study (1999/2000) saw need for
supply to grow to 30 TCF.
n
NPC study (2003) shows how hard it will
be to keep supply even flat through 2009.
n
Conventional natural gas peaked in 1973.
n
Non-conventional gains created illusion that flat
supply in 1990s could grow if needed.
n
2000/2001 drilling boom shattered this dream.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
Natural Gas Prices Have Become
A “One-Way” Street
Natural Gas Prices Have Become
A “One-Way” Street
n
Commodity core assumptions:
–
High prices create surge in supply.
–
High prices also depress demand.
–
Low prices depress supply.
–
Low prices encourage greater demand.
n
This “thesis” underpins why commodities are
“commodating.”
n
High natural gas prices stimulate more “planting”
but not genuine supply growth.
n
If prices fall, supply also falls. (A one-say street)
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
“Quo Vadis” Natural Gas Supply?
“Quo Vadis” Natural Gas Supply?
n
Conventional gas supplies are in steep decline.
–
New vintage gas wells decline by 40-50% in one year.
–
When production is > 10% of peak, final decline is
slow.
n
Oilfield technology revolution accelerated ability
to drain proved reserves.
n
Conventional gas supply peaked in 1973 at
63 bcf/day.
n
It is probably approximately 25 to 30 bcf/day
now.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
Creating Net Growth By
Non-Conventional Supply Is Tough
Creating Net Growth By
Non-Conventional Supply Is Tough
n
All non-conventional sources are
“non-conventional”.
n
Arctic gas has hurdles to overcome.
–
Proved North Slope gas is now injected.
–
McKenzie Delta gas “found” is not great.
–
Exploration in Arctic has been tough.
n
CBM/Tight Sands gas is small/wellhead.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
LNG’s Future Is Bright
(But Tough To Grow Fast)
LNG’s Future Is Bright
(But Tough To Grow Fast)
n
Global LNG markets are experiencing “Renaissance”.
n
U.S. was last to get aboard a fast moving train.
n
Why U.S. landed LNG has to grow.
2010 To
2015
(Bcf/day)
Implicit Demand
90
Probably U.S. Supply
40
Canadian/Arctic/Current LNG
10
Shortfall
40
ConocoPhillips Qatar Gas III: $5 billion for 1 bcf/day
of gas (in 2010). This is 2.5% of our need.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
Adequacy Of Global Natural Gas
Supply Is “Hazy”
Adequacy Of Global Natural Gas
Supply Is “Hazy”
n
All long-term global energy forecasts assume gas
demand will soar (and offset any surprises in oil supply).
n
Everyone assumes global gas supply is fabulous,
though stranded.
–
98% of “stranded” gas has never seen a drill bit.
–
Undrilled structures are not proved reserves.
n
65% of current global gas supply is in decline.
–
U.S./Canadian gas
–
Most of Russia’s gas
–
U.K. gas
–
Indonesian gas
–
Netherlands gas
If 2/3 of supply in decline, hard
for total growth to be high.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
How Did We Get Into This Energy Mess?
How Did We Get Into This Energy Mess?
n
Energy prices were “too low for too long”.
n
Low prices created illusion about energy security.
n
Low prices encouraged growth in demand.
n
Low prices inhibited growth of supply.
n
Supply growth might have ended
anyway.
n
Two decades of low energy prices took
a painful toll on energy sustainability,
let alone growth.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
What Will Future Energy Prices Be?
What Will Future Energy Prices Be?
n
For two decades, conventional energy wisdom
has assumed “prices are set to fall”.
n
Low prices inhibited any
supply growth and
stimulated energy demand.
n
There is no knowledge on
“replacement cost of a barrel of oil”.
n
Current prices are still too low.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
Global Energy Issues Are
Extremely Complex
Global Energy Issues Are
Extremely Complex
n
Worldwide oil demand at record high (exceeded
83 million b/d).
n
Natural gas and oil demand expected/needs to grow
by two-thirds over next 25 years.
n
World oil supplies are peaking.
n
Natural gas supplies could also peak.
n
This does not mean we have run out of either energy
source.
n
It does mean supply growth ends.
n
These are complex and serious issues.
S
IMMONS
& C
OMPANY
INTERNATIONAL
Investment
Bankers
to the
E
nergy
Industry