P1190352

MD Halina Tara*

iM senoush damagcd Apart from thc nng li nery, such ns necklaces, braccta* or armlets. iherc are knobbed sicklcs. axes. daggers and spearheads. Sonic ofthe Products, as ftanged axes from Stary Brus (Mazurek. Telepko 1991), Hrubieszów* Podgórze (Banasiow ie/ 1991. Fig. 4: 12) and Topomica (Kłosińska 2005a, Fig. 1 k and a bracclet (tom Puławy-Włostowicc (Bargieł 1984. Figs 3, 13). wercmadc according to thc tradition. w hich was crcatcd in thc mctallurgical workshops of thc Untocc culturc and cultivatcd still in thc tirnc of tlić Tumulus culturcs. The si\ lisbcs typical of thc Pre-Lusatian culturc workshops (or other Tumulus cultu-resi and thc carł> Lusatian culturc is marked in Lublin thc region thc bosi. Among thc products that fit in that stylistics thcrc are: double spiral amilcts from kosm (Cbomcniowcku 1964. Fig. 10). Gródek (Niedźwiedź 1985: 90. Fig. Ib). Toporni-ca (Blaici 19S4: 17) and łtusynne Kolonia (Kłosińska, Misiewicz 2003, Fig. 2). as wcłl as perhaps a necklacc from Modryniec (Kokowski 1993). The set ofobjccts tóund m thc hoard frcwn Zagłoba-Dratów also corrcsponds with thosc comciuions (Ganławski. Wesołowski 1956). Other artefaets c.g. knobbed sicklcs knownfrom Tys/owicc i Kuśnierz 1986. Fig. 1: S), Komarów (Kuśnierz 1988. Fig. Ic). Gródek tPoklewski 1958, Platę 14: 3). Hrubieszów (Cichoszewska 1922- 1924: 132) and thc \K'imt> of Biłgoraj (Kłosińska 2005b. Fig. 1) - are stylistically linkcd mninly to thc Carpathian mctallurgical centrcs and may be dated in thc Lublin region both to Ac bwtc stage of thc TC and to thc carly stage of the LC. Thcrc are also somc obgects iikc a brv>nzc head from Tyszowce (Kuśnierz 1989. Fig. 70. which do not have any ckwte referenccs. and may be a local product (Taras 1995: 87-88).

The problems of bronze metallurgy on Polish lands and charactcristic featu-res of work.shops belonging to particular cultural cyclcs have becn frecjucntly the aobjcct of detailed studies and have a rich bibliography (e.g. Blajcr 1984; 1990: 1999; 2001; Gedl 1980; 1992; 1995; w e may find thcrc a nuniber of referenccs to the d»eo'cno madc in thc Lublin region; furthermorc sec Niedźwiedź 1991: Niedźwiedź. Taras 2003; Taras 1995: 87—88). therefore thosc issues are not dis-cussed in this paper in detail.

Bow-e\cr. we shall givc somc attention to two daggers from Ślipc/c (Czo-pek 1996: 115 and Fig. 63) and from Strzyżów (Gedl 1980. Piąte 11: 70). Both of tbetn st> hstically correspond with thc discovcrics known front thc Pomian i: sfieppes. The damaged dagger from Strzyżów rcscmblcs with its shapetheCGC daggers of typc § according to Kaiser (2003: 135. Fig. 51). The best annlogyto thc hnd trom Sltpcze constitutc daggers from Daumjnny vcl Cuconcgi N^echi (Berezanskaja. Otrośficnko. Cerednićenko, Sarafutdinova 1986: 11. Fig. 3; S.m 1998: 296, Fig. 24 I ). charactcristic of thc Sabatinovkn culturc artefaets, prób*-Wy Ma earły stage

The majonty of bronze artefaets quotcd herc. as well as other unmentiomd. —i ■rryijUiisi ^ iwo temtorial zones I lic flrsl is locatcd on thc westernedgeor MHdMhl Iłplaml near thc \'istula river valley. The sccond. on thc oppositecdp. Mtocn thc Huc/wa river basin and thc upper Bug river basin. Both ofthe zono warw thc wibjeci of intcnsrvc TC settlemcnt (Taras 1995. Map !)•

Stonc mace-hcads and “horn-shaped" splndlo whorls. Stone mace-hcads mseellaitcous shapcs and sizes nppeared slarting from the I ncolithic Age to tlić tanAge in vartous culturc zones, e.g.; in thc Corded Warc culturc circlc. in the culturc groups (e.g.: thc PGC and thc CGC and other), thc Tumulus cultu-,> ind the LC They were ffcąuently a subjcct of typological and chronological Jics. and of resenreh conccming their functional and symbolic role (e.g. Be-Mnski 1087; Godl 1,996; KloCko 1994; 2001; 2002; Kośko 2002) In thc I uhlin region they are a quite rafę phenomenon (Fig. 2) In thc light of reccnt resenreh (Watddcwicc 2000: 90, Map 1) we know only 6 c.scmplars of macc-hcads from • r,-. found in its cast bordcrland (Biała Podlaska 2 cxcmplnrs, Chylin, Sielec.

' imin. Zabrodzie). Ali of them are single finds. without any cultur.il context. Iicy havc a geometrie shapc. mostly mclon-hkc: that type in Silesia is dated to II- III periods of the Bronze Age (Gedl 1996: 41).

The same idea sccms to be reproduccd by clay spindlc-whorls, so-callcd hom-shaped", which occur in thc number of 40 excmplars tnainly in Ukrainę in ihc emironment ofthcTC and thc Sośnica culturc (Berezanskaja 1972: 123-124;

2 Diiinhuiim of utonę mnco-ltcjul*. (a) antl "hom \h.t|v»r tftmll* «ho«K (bl

, ³ feata PtKłiask,. (afto Wits/ktowt. Z 2000) % Cłiyłtn tarte- w .s. k-, v*u '<xvt 4 s > .. «altot W ś^.,, JMAfc (idei HkthnWkl )%4), ft /•hrodrtc (nttci OoMi lenOh. ' IM«mm m» i (iAk "WW l^' » -'p*IM)),« * Hanna, *ttr I (ttltei t)ąbt\ł\*xk* l«Mk 10 (lebah^ia Kok«n n*» ’    I• Ragatla,

** U uftat Tania ItMfc U IWcnM (uafn«hliaN«4>. I> 14 TefMioUW mm N ? |«Aar Nw* “

NteUwimM. Tatn« 1907), \\ /<nxm %m ' t*lW» Bania, Asłiow-Ua ttl