2455029201

26 Stanisław Mazur

Easton D., The Political System. An Inąuiry in the State of Political Science, New York 1953.

Etzioni A., Mixed scanning: a third approach to decision-making, „Public Administration Review” 27,1967, nr 4.

Fischer F., Reframing Public Policy: Discoursive Politics and Deliberative Practices, New York 2003.

Gould J., The Structure ofEvolutionary Iheory, Cambridge 2002.

Handbook of Evaluation Research, red. E.L. Struening, M.B. Brewer, Beverly Hills 1983.

Horowitz R., Scientific propaganda: Harold D. Lasswell, [w:] Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics, red. H.J. Storing, New York 1962.

Howlett M., Ramesh M„ Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystem, II ed., Oxford 2003. Johnson J.B., Reynolds H.T., MycoffJ.D., Metody badawcze w naukach politycznych, Warszawa 2010.

Jones C.O., Introduction to the Study of Public Policy, Belmont 1970.

Lasswell H.D., A Pre-view of Policy Sciences, New York 1971.

Lasswell H.D. Thepolicy orientation, [w:] The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method, red.

D. Lerner, H.D. Lasswell, Standford, CA 1951.

Levin R. I. et al„ Quantitative Approaches to Management, New York 1989.

Lindblom Ch.E., The science of ‘muddling through', „Public Administration Review” 19,1959, nr 2.

Lipsky M., Street-level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas ofthe lndividual in Public Services, Russell 1980.

Łowi T., Four Systems of policy, politics and choice, „Public Administration Review” 32,1972, nr 4.

Marks K., Engels F., Tezy o Feuerbachu. Dzieła, Warszawa 1975.

Mayntz R., Derlien H.U., Party patronage and politicization of the West Germany administrative elite 1970-1987 — Toward Hybridization?, „Governance” 2,1989, nr 4.

Morgan G., Images of Organization, Thousand Oaks 2006.

Morrow J.D., Gamę Iheory for Political Scientists, Princetown 1994.

Nagel S., Handbook of Public Policy Evaluation, Thousand Oaks 2001.

Nagel T., The View form Nowhere, New York 1986.

Nienhiiser W., Resource dependence theory — how well does it explain behavior of organizations, „The International Review of Management Studies” 19,2008, nr 1-2.

Pfeffer J., Salancik G.R., The External Control of Organizations: a Resource Dependence Perspective, Stanford 2003.

Pierson P., Path dependence, increasing returns, and the study of politics, „American Political Science Re-view” 94,2000, nr 2.

Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach, red. P. Sabatier, H. Jenkins-Smith, Boulder 1993. Pressman J.L., Wildavsky A., Implementation, Los Angeles 1973.

Sabatier P.A., Mazmanian D., Policy Paradox and Political Reason, Glemdew 1983.

Sabatier P.A., Political science andpublicpolicy, „Political Science and Politics” 24,1991.

Simon H.A., Decision making: rational, nonrational, and irrational, „Educational Administration Quarterly” 29,1993.

Smith K.B., Larimer Ch.W., The Public Policy Theory Primer, New York 2013.

Spitzer R.J., Promoting policy theory: revising the arenas of power, „Policy Studies Journal” 15,1987, nr 4. Stone D., Policy Paradox and Political Reason, Glenview 1988.

The Argumentative Tum in Policy Analysis and Planning, red. F. Fisher, J. Forester, Durham. 1993.

The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, red. R. Goodin, M. Rein, M. Moran, New York 2006.

Wilson J.Q., Political Organizations, New York 1973.

Wprowadzenie do nauk o polityce publicznej, red. M. Zawicki, Warszawa 2013.

Zybała A., Polityki publiczne. Doświadczenia w tworzeniu i wykonywaniu programów publicznych w Polsce i w innych krajach, Warszawa 2012.

Wrocławskie Studia Politologiczne 18. 2015 © for this edition by CNS