Clean Coal Technology
Current Progress, Future Promise
National Mining Association
101 Constitution Avenue, NW
S u i t e 5 0 0 E a s t
W a s h i n g t o n , D C 2 0 0 0 1
202/463-2600 | www.nma.org
Last updated: March 2003
p h o t o s : D O E / N R E L , N E T L
1
Coal
is vital to present and future U.S. economic and
energy security — it currently
provides more than half of
the nation’s electricity generation
and will continue as the
largest single source of electricity supply through 2020 and
beyond (source: Annual Energy Outlook 2002, EIA).
Clean coal technologies
(CCT) — the products of research
and development conducted over the past 20 years —
have
resulted in more than 20 new, lower-cost, more efficient
and environmentally compatible technologies
for electric
utilities, steel mills, cement plants and other industries
(source: U.S. DOE, Office of Fossil Energy).
CCT helped make it possible for U.S. utilities to meet more
stringent Clean Air Act requirements
while continuing to
utilize America’s most plentiful domestic energy resource
— coal.
The original Clean Coal Technology Program, which began
in 1986, focused on commercializing processes that helped
reduce sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions and
demonstrating more efficient and environmentally friendly
alternatives to traditional pulverized coal boilers.
New
programs — such as the Clean Coal Power Initiative
(CCPI) — are essential for building on the progress of
the original CCT Program, finding solutions for reducing
trace emissions of mercury; reducing or eliminating carbon
dioxide emissions; and increasing fuel efficiencies.
Over
the longer term, research will be directed toward developing
coal-based hydrogen fuels. If coupled with sequestration,
this will allow greater use of coal with zero emissions.
HIGHLIGHTS
Clean Coal Technologies
provide abundant,
cleaner electric power
at less cost.
5000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
2002p
2005
2010
2015
2020
Projected Electricity Supply by Generators, 2002-25
b
illi
o
n KwH
Total
Coal
source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy
Outlook 2003, Table 8. p=projection
2025
6000
2
WHAT ARE
CLEAN COAL
TECHNOLOGIES?
New, coal-based technological innovations are environmentally superior
and more operationally efficient than technologies in common use today.
In general, they fall into the following categories:
C o m b u s t i o n
P o s t - C o m b u s t i o n
C o n v e r s i o n
Combining coal with other
substances in the boiler to
improve efficiency and remove
impurities. An example would be
fluidized-bed combustion, where
limestone or dolomite are added
during the combustion process to
mitigate SO
2
formation.
Using “scrubbers” (flue gas
desulfurization), chemical cleaning
or precipitators to remove large
quantities of sulfur, other impurities
and particulate matter (dust and
ash) from emissions before they
are released into the atmosphere.
Using heat and pressure to convert
coal into a gas or liquid that can be
further refined and used cleanly.
An example would be Integrated
Gasification Combined Cycle, and
other gasification and liquefaction
technologies.
Basic Fluidized-Bed Combustion
Flue Gas Desulfurization
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle
I l l u s t r a t i o n s : U . S . D e p a r t m e n t o f E n e r g y,
C l e a n C o a l Te c h n o l o g y C o m p e n d i u m ,
w w w. l a n l . g o v / p r o j e c t s / c c t c
3
CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAM – HISTORY
Projects were selected and technology
d e m o n s t r a t i o n s c o n d u c t e d b e t w e e n
1986-93 — a jointly funded effort by
government and industry to demonstrate
and commercialize new, lower cost options
for controlling emissions of sulfur dioxide
(SO
2
), nitrogen oxides (NOx) at coal-
based power plants, as well as to improve
power plant performance and efficiencies.
The program resulted in 38 pioneering
projects in 18 states that eventually
produced 22 commercial successes
(defined by DOE as resulting in domestic
or international sale of the technology,
or the technology continuing to operate
economically at the plant site).
By law, private industry is required to fund
at least 50% of each project — the reality:
industry provided two-thirds of the funding
— $3.5 billion of a total of $5.3 billion.
Private Indu
Government
4%
$3.5 billion
$1.8 billion
Funding of Original Clean Coal Technology Program
source: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, http://www.fe.doe.gov
4
CLEAN COAL SCORECARD
Project
Company
Location
Gas Suspension Absorption
AirPol
W. Paducah, KY
Confined Zone Dispersion
Bechtel
Seward, PA
LIFAC Sorbent Injection
LIFAC
Richmond, IN
Adv. Flue Gas Desulfurization
Pure Air
Chesterton, IN
CT-121 Flue Gas Scrubber
So. Co. Services
Newnan, GA
NOx Control - Wall-Fired
So. Co. Services
Coosa, GA
Coal Reburning
B&W Co.
Cassville, WI
Low-NOx Cell Burner
B&W Co.
Aberdeen, OH
Gas Reburning/Low-NOx Burn.
EERC
Denver, CO
Micronized Coal Reburning
NYSEG
Lansing, NY
Selective Catalytic Reduction
So. Co. Services
Pensacola, FL
NOx Control - T-Fired
So. Co. Services
Lynn Haven, FL
SNOX Flue Gas Cleaning
ABB
Niles, OH
LIMB SO
2
/NOx Control
B&W Co.
Lorain, OH
SOx-NOx-ROx Box
B&W Co.
Dilles Bottom, OH
Gas Reburning/Sorbent Inj.
EERC
Two sites - IL
Milliken Clean Coal Project
NYSEG
Lansing, NY
Dry NOx/SOx Control Sys.
Pub. Service CO
Denver, CO
McIntosh PFBC Project (4A)
City of Lakeland
Lakeland, FL
McIntosh PFBC Project (4B)
City of Lakeland
Lakeland, FL
JEA Fluidized Bed Project
JEA
Jacksonville, FL
Tidd PFBC Project
Ohio Power Co.
Brilliant, OH
Nucla CFB Project
Tri-State
Nucla, CO
Kentucky Pioneer Project
Kentucky Pioneer
Trapp, KY
Pinon Pine Power Project
Sierra Pacific
Reno, NV
Tampa Electric IGCC Project
Tampa Electric
Mulberry, FL
Wabash River Repowering
Dynegy/PSI
W. Terre Haute, IN
Clean Coal Diesel
AD Little
Fairbanks, AK
Healy Clean Coal Project
AIDEA
Healy, AK
Liquid Phase Methanol
Air Products
Kingsport, TN
Adv. Coal Conversion
Western Syncoal
Colstrip, MT
Coal Quality Expert
CQ Inc. & ABB
Multiple Sites
ENCOAL Mild Gasification
ENCOAL Corp.
Gilette, WY
Integrated Coal/Ore Reduction
CPICOR
Vineyard, UT
Pulse Combustor
MTCI
Baltimore, MD
Blast Furnace Injection Sys.
Bethlehem Steel
Burns Harbor, IN
Cyclone Combustor
Coal Tech Corp.
Williamsport, PA
Cement Kiln Scrubber
Passamaquoddy
Thomaston, ME
Commercial Successes to Date
(Domestic or international sales made, or technology
continues to operate commercially at plant site)
1986-93 Clean Coal Technology
Project Selections
38 Projects – 18 States
$1.8 Billion – Federal Government
$3.5 Billion – Private Industry/States
$5.3 Billion – Total Cost
for more information, visit www.lanl.gov/projects/cctc/factsheets/fs_loc.html
5
MAJOR TECHNOLOGICAL
BENEFITS OF CCTP
Technology
Impact
Low Nitrogen Oxide (NOx)
Burners
• Now on 75 percent of U.S. coal-based power plants.
• 1/2-to-1/10th the cost of older systems.
• Helped utilities comply with more stringent January 2000 Clean Air Act NOx emission
requirements.
• Between 1980-2000, NOx emissions from coal power plants declined 56 percent,
measured by pounds of emissions per kilowatt hour — low NOx burners have played an
increasing role in this success story.
Selective Catalytic Reduction
(SCR)
• Achieves NOx reductions of 80-to-90 percent or more.
• Technology today costs half what it did in the 1980s.
• Systems are on order or under construction on 30 percent of the existing U.S. coal-
fired generating capacity.
Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)
• FGD systems now cost one-third what they did in the 1970s.
• More than 400 commercial units have been deployed.
• SO2 emissions from coal-based power plants declined 61 percent between 1980-2000
(based on lbs. of emissions per kWh) — while coal use by utilities rose 74 percent over
the same period. FGD systems have played an important role.
Fluidized Bed Combustion (FBC)
• Now over 170 operating FBC units in the U.S. and 400 worldwide.
• Commercialized — more than $6 billion in domestic sales and nearly $3 billion
in overseas sales have resulted from U.S. public and private investment in FBC
technology research, development and demonstration.
• Removes SO2, NOx inside the boiler — no additional controls necessary.
Integrated Gasification Combined
Cycle (IGCC)
• Over 1,500 megawatts of coal-based generation operating today; another 1,900
megawatts are gasifying refinery wastes; another 2,200 megawatts are in design.
• 16,500 MWw (megawatt equivalent) of IGCC is expected to be operating in the United
States by 2020.
source: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy
for more information, visit www.fe.gov/coal_power/cct/
6
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
DURING THE CCTP ERA
Year
Coal Use for Electricity Generation
(Million Short Tons)
Coal NOx Emissions
(Pounds of Emissions per MWh)
Coal SO
2
Emissions
(Pounds of Emissions per MWh)
1980
569
10.54
27.67
1985
694
7.48
22.30
1990
781
7.09
19.13
1991
784
6.99
18.97
1992
795
6.88
18.29
1993
832
6.80
17.19
1994
838
6.66
16.93
1995
850
6.53
13.58
1996
897
6.24
13.64
1997
921
6.12
13.67
1998
937
5.80
13.31
1999
941
5.15
12.42
2000
986
4.61
10.78
2001
967
4.38
10.46
COAL
USE
UP
70%
COAL
NOx
EMITTED
DOWN
58%
COAL
SO
2
EMITTED
DOWN
62%
Note: Figures are rounded. Total emissions reductions are due to several factors, which include increased commercialization and deployment of clean coal technologies.
(Sources: Energy Information Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, National Air Quality and Emissions Trends Report, 2001.)
7
SO2 Emission Rate from
Electricity Generation (lbs/MWh)
NOx Emission Rate from
Electricity Generation (lbs/MWh)
CCT IS IMPORTANT,
NOW AND IN THE FUTURE
Electricity demand will increase 53.4 percent over the next 25 years.
Meeting this rising growth rate will require the construction of the equivalent of more than 1,200 new power
plants of 300 megawatts each — the equivalent of about 65 plants each year.
Coal will remain the largest single source of electricity — accounting for 51 percent of power generation in
2025.
(source: Table 8, Annual Energy Outlook 2003)
Clean coal technologies will help meet these needs, plus continue the decline in SO
2
and NOx emissions
already underway.
EQUALLY IMPORTANT …
CCT will help utilities
comply with more stringent
environmental standards
and help address climate
change concerns in the
years ahead.
10.5
6.6
4.4
3.0
2001
2025p
2001
2025p
p = projection. These data include emissions from coal and other fuel sources. Estimates
assume no changes to current Clean Air Act requirements. Source: Annual Energy Outlook
2003, Reference Case, Energy Information Administration.
The recently announced FutureGen project takes Clean Coal further. FutureGen, a plant to produce
hydrogen from coal and sequester emissions, will be the world’s first zero emission coal-fired plant.
8
Develop a zero emission coal
based hydrogren production facility
incorporating carbon sequestration.
FUTURE CCT FOCUS AREAS
Meet increasingly stringent environmental
challenges and expectations that were
not part of the original CCT program
— especially in the areas of mercury
control and carbon sequestration — while
continuing reductions in SO2 and NOx.
How much coal does the U.S. have?
U.S. recoverable coal reserves are 274 billion tons (according to U.S. EIA),
enough to last 280 years at present rates of use
Did you know…
Coal represents 95 percent of U.S. fossil fuel reserves?
Nine out of every 10 tons of coal is used to make electricity?
The energy contained in 2001 U.S. coal production exceeded the
combined energy of U.S. oil imports and domestic oil production?
Provide continually improving
efficiencies, cost benefits and
processes that take advantage of
coal’s diversity as a liquid, gas or
solid energy resource.
Allow the continued use of plentiful
domestic coal resources to meet
growing electricity demand.
9
Ozone
By May 2004,
EPA regulations to
reduce the regional
transport of ozone
will require utilities
in 20 Eastern states
and the District
of Columbia to
sharply reduce NOx
emissions below
levels specified in
the 1990 Clean Air
Act Amendments.
Enforcement
In November 1999,
EPA filed lawsuits
against seven
utilities and issued an
administrative order
against an eighth,
charging violation of
New Source Review
(NSR) requirements.
All the civil actions
seek retrofit of state-
of-the-art control
technologies on more
than 10 percent of
total U.S. coal-based
capacity.
Mercury
EPA will promulgate
new mercury control
regulations for
coal-based power
plants by December
2004. Currently, the
removal of mercury
from commercial
technology varies
by coal type and
is highly variably
within each type,
making compliance
problematic with
regulatory options
under consideration.
Clear Skies Act
Proposal would
reduce and cap NOx,
SO
2
and mercury
emissions from
power generators
at 70% below 1990
Clean Air Act levels
by 2018. Specific
technologies will need
to be developed and
commercialized to
achieve reductions
of multiple emissions
and pollutants.
Particulate Matter
Promulgated in
1997, revised
National Ambient
Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS)
are intended to
reduce the levels of
airborne particulate
matter — including
fine particles,
requiring further
reductions in these
emissions.
FUTURE CHALLENGES —
TECHNOLOGY CAN PROVIDE SOLUTIONS
The bottom line: Clean Coal Technology development will be more essential
than ever in meeting new long-term Clean Air Act requirements while
providing cost savings to the American consumer.
10
Development
and demonstration of
a zero emission coal based power plant
through the “Integrated Squestration
and Hydrogen Research Initiative,” the
FutureGen project.
Sequestration — CO2
capture and storage.
Currently, only “carbon
sinks” (forests, oceans,
etc.) have been shown to
be effective.
Mineralization
(injecting CO2 into
rocks, which absorb it)
and reuse.
Development and
demonstration of
combustion plant and
gasification plant
separation.
Improvements in
power plant operating
efficiencies.
CLIMATE CHANGE: CARBON DIOXIDE
MITIGATION & MANAGEMENT
It is important to address climate change
with technology, while preserving
economic growth. Possible options
include:
11
Improved operating efficiencies of new
power generation technologies from the
Clean Coal Technology program are 30-to-
40% higher than a conventional coal plant —
this translates to a nearly equal percentage
reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.
(source: U.S. Department of Energy)
MORE EFFICIENT POWER PLANTS
HELP REDUCE CO
2
EMISSIONS
Increased power generating
efficiencies, in effect, mean
generating more megawatts
of electricity from the same
amount of fuel. The result
is lower power costs and
reductions in greenhouse
gas emissions.
11
12
CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY NEEDS
CONTINUED FEDERAL SUPPORT
To continue the research
momentum generated
by the original CCTP,
which provided numerous
technological innovations
currently benefitting society.
To assure continued
research, development and
demonstration of a new
generation of advanced
technologies that are
promising, but too high-risk to
be financed solely by private
industry.
To allow America to take full
advantage of its vast, 280-
year supply of coal resources
to meet burgeoning
electricity demand and
encourage economic growth,
while meeting more stringent
environmental objectives.
13
Efficiency improvements at existing power plants.
New computerized controls, improved burner designs, better
emissions cleaning systems, higher performance turbines.
Advanced high efficiency combustion and gasification cycles.
Generating systems with increased operating temperature.
High efficiency fuel cells operating on synthetic gas.
Hydrogen production — a clean energy carrier — via gasification.
Prevention, reduction and then capture and/or storage of CO
2
(sequestration).
Reduction of mercury emissions to required levels.
FOCUS AREAS FOR NEW
TECHNOLOGY R&D
DOE/NREL
14
MOVING FORWARD
Emphasis on coal utilization technology development
must continue over the next decade.
Funding needs
$2 billion
each from
government (as
contained in the
“Clean Coal Power
Initiative”) and
industry.
$1 billion
for
the industry/
government
FutureGen
project.
15
“Clean Coal Power Initiative (CCPI)” proposed by President Bush: $2 billion
for CCT over 10 years
Both Senate and House included CCPI in bills passed in 107th Congress
as well as investment and production tax incentives for advanced clean
coal technologies – bills did not get out of conference.
CCPI and CCT incentive package still has strong bi-partisan support.
Both will be included in stand-alone bills as well as in comprehensive
energy legislation in the 108th Congress.
Fiscal year 2002 budget for DOE included $150 million for CCT research.
This was combined with FY 2003 funding of $150 million for a combined
$300 million CCT solicitation.
On January 15, 2003, eight projects were awarded a total of $317 million dollars
for CCPI’s first phase. Industry will contribute over $1 billion – well beyond the
50 percent cost share requirement. Projects focus on reductions in mercury,
SO
2
and NOx; on increasing efficiency and reducing GHG emissions; and on
using coal waste.
A $130 million budget request has been made for FY 2004.
POSITIVE INITIATIVES
NEED SUPPORT
for more
information, visit
www.nma.org
Support for the the Department of Energy’s FutureGen, a $1 billion venture to
build a prototype of the fossil fuel plant of the future that will combine coal-
based electricity with hydrogen production in a zero emission process.