generally people use too many plastic bags
because people usually use to plastic bags, which are not re-use
we should use green bags, which aren't dangerous to environment
it's impossible because people are like to use to use plastic bags
there were some actions against plastic bags, which are dangerous for environment
but people are not convinced to other ideas
and they use plastict bags only once
but sometimes we can use plastic bags more times
and it's a sollution which can help a bit
what's mean sollution? - rozwiązanie
I think there should be more actions against plastic bags and other products which szkodzą the environment
or which polutes environment
za
they don't seep nie przeciekaja
we don't have to remember about taking it from house to the shop
they are free
they're quite solid
and very popular and you can take how many you want
they're transparent (przezroczysty) and you see what you have in it
and cheap in production
tera przeciw
czasem też nie są wytrzymałe
they rot too long
they destroy the environment
rot to jest rozkładać się? - tak znalzłam w słowniku
they are pollution on street, because people throw it everywhere
and when it's a wind, birds can zaplątać się in it
animals could eat bag and die
zaplątać się-enmesh
when people will want to use paper-bags, millions of trees will be cut
bo the besat are material's bags ;p
so.. to sum it up, the material's bags are the best choice (but they are troche obciachowe xD)
but paper bags are make in waste trees
moze najpierw plusy?
more money - better procted environment
the goverment should spend more money on protecting the environment
environment is a legacy, which stays after us for our children and grandchildren
if ekolodzy have to more maney, they will open new rezerwaty or national praks and they will rescue too many animals or rosliny
samo have bez "to"
if ecologists spend more money on environment, they will open new reserves and national parks ant they will rescue much more species of animals and plants
powiedziałaś że oni uratuja za dużo zwierząt ;P
People pay taxes and they have right to live in unpolluted environment for this money
to jakie jeszcze mogą być plusy?
no conflicts with greenpeace
a może minusy chociaż?>
there are many problems, which the government should pay for
if the goverment spend more money on environment, they haven't it for other things for country?
and.. that's a possibility, that this money will be taken by ecologic-organisations and they won't be used for real nature's protection - istnieje możliwość że całą tą kase wezmie greenpeace i inne organizacje na jakąś biurokratyczną robote a zwierzątka dalej bedą się dusić w siatkach i głodować i ginać
if the goverment dont't spend more money, in the future they will spend more more money, because people will ilness and the environment will be completly destroy
more more money? xD to jak to jest poprawnie?
in the future they will have to spend money also for people' ilnesses
so the costs will be higher
more more money było ładniejsze ;p
a lot of people are not aware of environmental issues
lots people dont't know how they pollute environment
they think that them wastes are not important
for destroy environment
people don`t want know about protecting environment because they so lazy
to protect environment
but in tv or in newspapers aren't informations about protect envirnoment, so people don't know how important is prtect it
so, our topic is, why people aren't aware of environment issues
big firm don`t respect regulation about protect envirinment
I agree with you, but what can we do, to convince them to protect environment? use the filtrs or else..Kasiu
in my opinion in school should be more actions about protct the environment, which some people will learn young people how protect environment
but protecting environment should be also important for adults
but if teenegers will want to protect
Cicha 18:53:24
their parents they have to ;d they have to help them in it
some organisations try to convince people how it's important by using paper hand-bill (ulotka) do you think that it's a good way?
ther should be also some campaigns in media
i think it's good idea, but some people don't read hand-bill and they throw it
I think that most people don't read it
so it's anti-ecological
because they throw this paper and they make a rubbish
and there are many trees, which were cut for this paper
and without trees and plants, our lives are in danger
but organisation ecological, which make this hand bill also destroy environments
because papers are made in trees
so we should be conscious of danger which is caused by many seemingly unimportant things we do eevery day
seemingly-pozornie
but if campaigns be in tv and radio?
lub apparently
that's a good way
and people won't cut down trees ;d
because that's the way, which doesn't cause a pollution of environment like hand-bills
there should be more lessons at school about the envirnoment
so in my opinion the biology lesson is not enough
because we learn about animals and plants but there is nothing about protecting the environment and there are not many issues of ecology
if this lesson will interesting that would be good idea
and do you think that we should have another lesson, on which we learn only about ecology or we should have more topics of environment on biology lesson?
more topics of environment on biology lesson
do you think that students will be interested in it?
if this lesson will be intersting
if you have a biology lesson, what would interest you the most?
i think the most interesting issues will be rescue species of animals and plants
what we can do to help animals
or issues about us working for help ecologists in stpo destroy environment
or issues about stopped extinct animals
I think these are very interesting topic
how we stop destroy environment and how we can help in this ecologists
so now we see that students will be interested in lessons about wnvironment
and that's a necessary to do these lessons in schools
companies that pollute the environment should pay higher fines
are there in Poland in a law some fines against companies which pollute the environment?
Polish law*
co to law? prawo
and do you think that's a good choice?
and what would you do if you would be a director of a company, which pollute an environment?
at first I never will be director in company which pollute an envirenment
i try to some thing change
but the filtrs and some other things which are against pollutions are expensive
so, will you pay for them or pollute the environment?
ich verstehe nicht
was hast du nich verstanden?
but if anyone use this things we`ll in the future die
how much should the companies pay for the pollutions?
but the companies are very rich, so they don't take over, if they pay fines and they pollute against
pollute again?
so in my opinion this like companies should be close, because in future copmapies will be inteligent and they won't pollute ;d
in my opinion they under pay for the pollutions
so how much should they pay?
they should pay more, because the pollution is killing us
it should be illegal for households not to sort out their rubbish
Is sorting out rubbish good or bad?
good
why?
because this wastes will be re used
because if we sorting out rubbish we can re used it
Do you think that kosze na śmieci on streets are good way to convince people that sorting out is good?
yes
kosze na śmieci-trashcan for sorts of rubbish
but people need more times to use it
and do you think that there should be fines for not sorting out?
and some people don't want sorts it
yes but
early trashcan for sorts of rubbish must zastapic zwykle kosze na smieci
zastąpić-replace
but there are other wastes, which doesn't sorts, what are you doing with it?
In my opinion sorting out the rubish will protect us from living in a dirty environment and from many ilnesses, and that's way we should sort them out.
we can try to replace those things by things which we can recycle
and in the future our environment will be better
and wysypiska smieci not rize
z tego ostatniego, to trochę mało już kojarzę
rubbish tip-wysypisko
no wysypiska sie nie powiekszaja
hand-bill - ulotka