New York Times confirms Natural News investigation: Mumps now spread mostly by vaccinated children

Monday, November 06, 2017 by Mike Adams

The New York Times is now confirming that Natural News has been right all along about the real cause of mumps outbreas in America. In a bombshell article entitled, “Mumps Makes a Comeback, Even Among the Vaccinated,” the NYT admits that vaccinated children are spreading mumps. Via the NYT: (bolding added)

Most of the recent cases occurred in outbreaks, including a large one in Arkansas, rather than as a sporadic here-a-case, there-a-case disease. And most of the outbreaks were among people 18 to 22 years old, most of whom had had the requisite two doses of mumps vaccine in childhood. “We are seeing it in a young and highly vaccinated population,” Dr. Routh said.

New York Times in 2017 confirms what Natural News has been reporting for a decade

Natural News, of course, has repeatedly warned that mumps outbreaks occur predominantly among children who have been vaccinated against mumps, thereby proving that mumps vaccines don’t work. This realization is fully aligned with the shocking science discovery publicized last week that solved the riddle of why flu shots don’t work, too.

Earlier this year, Natural News scooped the New York Times, reporting, “Mumps outbreaks reported among vaccinated children … Is the vaccine causing the outbreaks?”

Even before that, Natural News has been trailblazing truth-based journalism on the topic of vaccines with all the following stories that further support what the New York Times has only now discovered… that mumps vaccines don’t work. Some of the stories we’ve published over the last decade include:

Once again, the news you read on Natural News five or ten years ago is now today’s news in the New York Times. (If you want to stay 5 – 10 years ahead of the game, read Natural News daily.)

When the first vaccine doesn’t work, try a second or third shot, vaccine quacks insist

Pathetically (and predictably), the New York Times is pushing the same old quackery the vaccine industry has historically invoked to try to cover up the fact that their products were only approved based on systematic scientific fraud (see below for details). Essentially, they’re all claiming that the way to stop vaccinated people from spreading mumps is to vaccinate them over and over again with the same vaccine that didn’t work the first time.

Via the NYT: (bolding added)

Dr. Patricia Quinlisk, the medical director and state epidemiologist for the Iowa Department of Public Health, dealt with an outbreak at the University of Iowa and surrounding area in 2015 to 2016 of more than 450 cases of mumps. The students involved had all had their childhood M.M.R. shots, she said, as required by the university, and the decision was made to hold a series of clinics offering a third dose of vaccine.

Indeed, when the first round of mumps vaccine quackery doesn’t work, the answer from the corrupt and scientifically inept vaccine industry is to push a second vaccine, a third vaccine and soon even a fourth mumps vaccine. This, we are told, will magically make them work if we only have ourselves injected enough times.

Mumps vaccines, in other words, generate their own repeat business by not working. This would be the equivalent in the car industry of a car dealer selling you a lemon vehicle that breaks down on the highway, then claiming you need to buy a second or third vehicle to “reinforce” the first car you bought, because that first car was a total piece of junk. In no other industry, by the way, are people so frequently pushed to buy and consume failed products based on such obvious quackery and junk science.

Remember, too, that the whole idea of immunization is that once your body is exposed to the virus, it builds antibodies for life. But in an attempt to explain why mumps vaccines don’t work, the vaccine industry has fabricated a whole new concept rooted in complete fiction: The idea that vaccines “wear off” and need to be repeated over and over again to make sure they “stick.” This anti-science bunk is, of course, peddled for the sole purpose of selling more vaccines even when they don’t really work as claimed.

Here’s the real reason why mumps vaccines don’t work

The real reason why vaccinated people keep spreading the mumps, of course, is because the mumps vaccine is a complete fraud. This fact has been openly admitted by two virologists who worked for Merck, one of the largest manufacturers of the MMR vaccine. As detailed in the Natural News article, “Merck vaccine fraud exposed by two Merck virologists; company faked mumps vaccine efficacy results for over a decade, says lawsuit“:

According to two Merck scientists who filed a False Claims Act complaint in 2010 — a complaint which has just now been unsealed — vaccine manufacturer Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test data, spiked blood samples with animal antibodies, sold a vaccine that actually promoted mumps and measles outbreaks, and ripped off governments and consumers who bought the vaccine thinking it was “95% effective.”

The PDF document detailing this False Claims Act is posted here.

From the Natural News story:

According to Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, both former Merck virologists, the Merck company engaged in all the following behavior:

• Merck knowingly falsified its mumps vaccine test results to fabricate a “95% efficacy rate.”

• In order to do this, Merck spiked the blood test with animal antibodies in order to artificially inflate the appearance of immune system antibodies. As reported in CourthouseNews.com:

Merck also added animal antibodies to blood samples to achieve more favorable test results, though it knew that the human immune system would never produce such antibodies, and that the antibodies created a laboratory testing scenario that “did not in any way correspond to, correlate with, or represent real life … virus neutralization in vaccinated people,” according to the complaint.(//www.courthousenews.com/2012/06/27/478…)

• Merck then used the falsified trial results to swindle the U.S. government out of “hundreds of millions of dollars for a vaccine that does not provide adequate immunization.”

• Merck’s vaccine fraud has actually contributed to the continuation of mumps across America, causing more children to become infected with mumps. (Gee, really? This is what NaturalNews has been reporting for years… vaccines are actually formulated to keep the outbreaks going because it’s great for repeat business!)

• Merck used its false claims of “95 percent effectiveness” to monopolize the vaccine market and eliminate possible competitors.

• The Merck vaccine fraud has been going on since the late 1990’s, say the Merck virologists.

• Testing of Merck’s vaccine was never done against “real-world” mumps viruses in the wild. Instead, test results were simply falsified to achieve the desired outcome.

• This entire fraud took place “with the knowledge, authority and approval of Merck’s senior management.”

• Merck scientists “witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine’s efficacy findings,” according to court documents (see below).

Following the unsealing of this 2010 False Claims Act, Chatom Primary Care, based in Alabama, smelled something rotten. Three days ago, Chatom filed a lawsuit against Merck. That lawsuit record is available here.

It alleges, among other shocking things:

[Merck engaged in] …a decade-long scheme to falsify and misrepresent the true efficacy of its vaccine.

Merck fraudulently represented and continues to falsely represent in its labeling and elsewhere that its Mumps Vaccine has an efficacy rate of 95 percent of higher.

In reality, Merck knows and has taken affirmative steps to conceal — by using improper testing techniques and falsifying test data — that its Mumps Vaccine is, and has been since at least 1999, far less than 95 percent effective.

Merck designed a testing methodology that evaluated its vaccine against a less virulent strain of the mumps virus. After the results failed to yield Merck’s desired efficacy, Merck abandoned the methodology and concealed the study’s findings.

…incorporating the use of animal antibodies to artificially inflate the results…

…destroying evidence of the falsified data and then lying to an FDA investigator…

…threatened a virologist in Merck’s vaccine division with jail if he reported the fraud to the FDA…

…the ultimate victims here are the millions of children who every year are being injected with a mumps vaccine that is not providing them with an adequate level of protection. And while this is a disease that, according to the Centers for Disease Control (‘CDC’), was supposed to be eradicated by now, the failure in Merck’s vaccine has allowed this disease to linger, with significant outbreaks continuing to occur.

Chatom Primary Care also alleges that the fraudulent Merck vaccine contributed to the 2006 mumps outbreak in the Midwest, and a 2009 outbreak elsewhere. It says, “there has remained a significant risk of a resurgence of mumps outbreaks…”

Read Vaccines.news to stay years ahead of the mainstream media

What all this proves is that if you really want to stay informed and ahead of the curve on why vaccines fail — and the total science fraud and medical quackery behind them — you need to get your news from independent media sources that aren’t funded by the pharmaceutical industry.

Vaccines.news is one of the best sources on the ‘net to get accurate, honest information that keeps you informed about vaccines. We also cover disease outbreaks at Outbreak.news.

za: http://www.vaccines.news/2017-11-06-new-york-times-confirms-natural-news-investigation-mumps-now-spread-by-vaccinated-children.html

===============================================================================

BOMBSHELL: United Nations admits latest outbreak of polio in Syria was caused by polio vaccines

Wednesday, August 30, 2017 by Vicki Batts

In war-torn Syria, there’s little doubt that the conflict has taken a toll on health. Now, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) reports that their attempt at using vaccines to “protect” children against polio has backfire — infecting more children with the devastating disease rather than saving them.

Vaccines make children sick, you don’t say?

As World Health Organization representative Elizabeth Hoff reports, “As of 18 August 2017, 33 children under the age of five have been paralyzed. The detection of the circulating vaccine derived polio virus type 2 (cVDPV2) cases demonstrates that disease surveillance systems are functional in Syria. Our priority now is to achieve the highest possible polio immunization coverage to stop the circulation of virus.”

Thirty-three children paralyzed by the vaccine that was supposed to protect them — and the UN’s response is to just keep doling out more vaccines? Sadly, that’s par for the course. Obviously, bad medicine is never the problem — there’s just not enough bad medicine, that’s all.

Fran Equiza, a UNICEF representative commented, “No child should have to live with devastating effects of polio.” And yet, this is the second outbreak of polio to strike Syria since the conflict first took roots in 2011.

Earlier this summer, NPR reported on this very phenomenon, wherein mutant strains from the polio vaccine caused more paralysis than wild polio. Could it really be that a lab-altered version of a virus is more dangerous than the one found in nature? Absolutely.

As Jason Beaubien reports, as of June 2017, there were more cases of child paralysis caused by the polio vaccine than the actual, wild-caught disease itself. At the time of his reporting, just six cases of “wild” polio, which is naturally occurring in the environment, had been reported worldwide. Conversely, 21 cases of vaccine-derived polio had been reported internationally in June. Obviously, in Syria that number skyrocketed over the last two months — 33 children in Syria alone have been paralyzed by vaccine-derived polio.

Raul Andino, a professor of microbiology at the University of California at San Francisco explains, “We discovered there’s only a few [mutations] that have to happen and they happen rather quickly in the first month or two post-vaccination. As the virus starts circulating in the community, it acquires further mutations that make it basically indistinguishable from the wild-type virus. It’s polio in terms of virulence and in terms of how the virus spreads.”

Andino’s research also shows that the polio virus used in the vaccine will replicate inside human hosts’ intestines. In places with poor sanitation, this often means it has the chance to spread from person-to-person with relative ease. Places where conflict and war have decimated health care systems are known for being breeding grounds for disease outbreak.

It comes as no surprise (sadly) that war-weary Syria is expected to have even more cases of polio in the coming months. Michael Zaffran, the director of polio eradication at the World Health Organization contends, “In Syria, there may be more cases coming up.” Zaffran adds that the WHO is aware of the risk that comes with the live polio vaccine and says it is “a very regrettable hiccup for the poor children that have been paralyzed, of course. But with regards to the whole initiative, you know it’s not something that is unexpected.”

He added that while the children’s paralysis is unfortunate, “from a public health perspective, the benefits far outweigh the risk.” Do you think that will comfort the children and their families as they struggle with the after-effects of vaccine-derived polio? [Related: Learn more about the risks of inoculation at Vaccines.news]

Sources for this article include:

UNICEF.org.hk UN.org NPR.org

za: http://www.vaccines.news/2017-08-30-bombshell-united-nations-admits-latest-outbreak-of-polio-in-syria-was-caused-by-polio-vaccines.html

==============================================================================

Biotech firms routinely blame “faulty genes” for adverse effects caused by pharmaceuticals, vaccines

Monday, January 01, 2018 by Ethan Huff

If there’s one thing that the pharmaceutical drug lords of our world are good at, it’s deflecting the blame whenever their poisons inevitably harm and kill people. And perhaps the biggest lie they want everyone to believe at all costs is that “faulty genes” are always responsible for any negative interactions, side effects, or adverse events that result from exposure to their legal narcotics – even when it’s completely obvious that genetics has nothing to do with it.

This institutionalized ignorance was on full display in an October 30, 2017, article published by Vox, in which a writer by the name of Julia Belluz tried to sound really professional in declaring that vaccines – which are loaded with autism-causing toxins – aren’t in any way associated with autism. It’s something that the establishment has been repeating over and over and over again ad nauseum ever since gastroenterologist Dr. Andrew Wakefield published a study in The Lancet journal simply explaining an association he observed between the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella and autism symptoms in children.

This study was so impactful that many parents made the informed decision to forego the MMR vaccine for their children, which in turn sparked a mass triggering event of the medical and pharmaceutical establishments, both of which were threatened by the prospect of losing billions of dollars in profits. Ever since, Dr. Wakefield has had his reputation dragged through the mud, and the mainstream media has been in a tizzy trying to explain away why so many vaccinated children have autism these days – their latest tactics being to aggressively blame “genetic defects.”

Belluz’s Vox article being the perfect illustration of this, the medical mafia wants everyone to now believe that so-called “autism genetics” is the most likely cause of the current autism epidemic, and that nobody should ever worry about mercury-laden vaccines. By using science-y sounding terminology and interviewing alleged experts in the field, the hope is that a critical mass of the population will simply accept this as fact, even though it has absolutely no basis whatsoever in actual reality.

Beware whenever some drug-pushing ‘expert’ makes wildly irrational claims based on ‘scientific consensus’

The way Belluz, in particular, mischaracterizes autism science is another frequently seen tactic, as she implies that the scientific “consensus” is in favor of the notion that environmental causes of autism are somehow overblown and overestimated, even though a substantial amount of published science actually contradicts this claim. In fact, several of the studies Belluz highlights in her hit piece against the vaccine-autism connection actually say the opposite of what she claims – though her readers would actually have to take the time to research the matter further in order to discover this.

“To be fair, Belluz’s discussion gives a nod to a ‘genes plus environment’ perspective on autism causation by acknowledging that an ‘underlying genetic predisposition or mutation’ generally needs to ‘collide’ with environmental triggers in order to give rise to ASD,” explains the World Mercury Project, which is dedicated to spreading awareness and truth about the dangers of mercury (thimerosal) in vaccines.

“However, Belluz characterizes the research on environmental risk factors for ASD as ‘blurry,’ ‘murky,’ ‘mixed’ and not ‘robust.’ Belluz also cites a study that, according to her, views shared genetic variants in families as ‘probably more important’ as an autism trigger than shared environments.”

Truth be told, it doesn’t take an extensive scientific background for a person with common sense to recognize that injecting the body with heavy metals, preservatives, aborted human fetal tissue, and all sorts of other dangerous chemicals is a recipe for health disaster. Read DangerousMedicine.com for more reporting on the health hazards of toxic medicine.

Sources for this article include: WorldMercuryProject.org Vox.com NaturalNews.com

za: http://www.vaccines.news/2018-01-01-biotech-firms-blame-genes-for-side-effects-of-their-drugs-despite-evidence-of-environmental-causes-of-autism.html

============================================================================

Top 10 ways to get deathly sick that no medical doctor will be able to solve

Monday, January 01, 2018 by S.D. Wells

Just because the United States is very advanced as far as industry, military and technology are concerned, this is in no way reflected by the corrupt medical and food industries, that are in the business of making innocent people sick and profiting off their perpetual (and virtually useless) chronic symptom care. It’s ironic that people have so much faith in chemotherapy, when the average failure rate is over 97 percent. Would you buy any other medicine if it read on the label there was less than a three percent chance it worked? Would you buy a car or an i-phone that had a three percent chance of working? What about nutritional supplements?

The boondoggle of Western medicine has “built-in” failure features that medical doctors don’t care about, and even if they did care, couldn’t do anything to change. Most non-infectious diseases and disorders in America are caused by chemicals in food and chemicals in medicine, and rare is the M.D. who will tell you to change nearly everything about your eating habits, much less explain in great detail that medication side effects are usually worse than the ailment being addressed. What good is eight years of medical school if all you learn how to do is juggle chemical medications? Sounds like a sick circus. Still, round and round goes the sick care merry-go-round, while the doctors get richer and the consumers get sicker. What’s the cure?

Have you been told you must eat meat to get enough protein and iron? Are you brainwashed to actually believe milk makes for stronger bones? Has your IQ been lowered so much by sodium fluoride in tap water that you think added fluoride helps clean your teeth and prevent cavities? Is your medical doctor prescribing pharmaceuticals to combat the symptoms and side effects from your other medications? Have you ever read the insert page for vaccines or flu shots? The ingredients will blow your mind (maybe literally), and you may stop wondering from where all of your children’s severe allergies stem. So, with all of that in mind, here are the top 10 ways to get deathly sick within 10 years in ways that no medical doctor will be able to solve (even though it’s all preventable). Remember, the following top ten list tells you what NOT to do!

1. Eat GMOs daily

Here’s the perfect example of technology gone awry. Just because scientists are wearing lab coats and looking through microscopes doesn’t mean the research is in the best interest of agriculture, the environment, farm animals or human health. The main goal of biotechnology and genetically modified organisms in food is to kill weeds and insects, with absolutely NO regard to anything else. Beware of anything GMO – none of it has ever been proven “safe or effective,” though they lie and preach that it all has by some worldly “consensus.” Chemical pesticides can cause cancer, dementia, severe allergies and central nervous system damage.

2. Drink tap water daily

Most U.S. municipal tap water contains deadly sodium fluoride (a known carcinogen and insecticide imported from China), artificial sweeteners, other people’s prescription medications, chlorine, and several heavy metal toxins, including aluminum and lead.

3. Take prescription medications daily

Nearly every single chemical medication ever prescribed adds to an acidic pH in the body which exacerbates inflammation, causes dehydration, and eventually cancer. Then there is the laundry list of side effects that are usually WORSE than the problem being treated.

4. Get the flu shot every year

Most influenza vaccines contain high levels of mercury (listed as thimerosal), but that’s just the beginning. No human should ever have brain-damaging aluminum, foreign animal proteins, or formaldehyde directly injected into muscle tissue, ever!

5. Consume artificial sweeteners daily (aspartame, sucralose, sorbitol)

Anything created in a laboratory, like synthetic sugar, is not natural and will warp your cells. The cumulative effect of warped cells is a word that starts with the letter “c.” Medical doctors say there’s no cure for this and prescribe chemotherapy, which causes more irregular cell division and uncontrolled multiplication.

6. Use personal care products daily that contain parabens, phthalates, aluminum and sodium laurel sulfate

Your skin is your largest organ. Don’t “feed it” chemicals! If the ingredients of your personal care products aren’t edible or even legible, avoid them.

7. Eat foods that are artificially colored and artificially flavored

Want a man-made disease or disorder that there’s “no cure” for? One hundred years ago, cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s and arthritis rarely existed in America. Avoid artificial anything.

8. Get every vaccine the CDC recommends

The CDC is a for-profit corporation listed on Dun and Bradstreet, or didn’t you know? The vaccine industry has paid out over $3 billion in damages for vaccines that caused severe health tragedies, including deaths. Read the vaccine insert pages yourself, because the doctors and nurses never do it for you!

9. Drink Coke, Diet Coke, Pepsi, or Diet Pepsi daily

Sodas contain at least two of the following three severely detrimental health ingredients: genetically modified high fructose corn syrup, artificial sweeteners, or phosphoric acid.

10. Eat canola oil regularly (organic or not)

Canola oil coagulates like glue in your blood. No canola plant on earth is natural. Every canola plant comes from rapeseed, which is toxic to all animals, including humans.

Want some natural remedies for your ailments? Check out NaturalPedia.com and get those chemicals out of your body as soon as possible. Then visit a local naturopathic physician and start asking questions about nutrition. You’ll be pleasantly surprised at the answers.

Sources for this article include: NaturalHealth365.com TruthWiki.org Cornucopia.org Health.com CDC.news NaturalNews.com TruthWiki.org

NCBI.nlm.nih.gov NaturalPedia.com

za: http://www.vaccines.news/2018-01-01-top-10-ways-to-get-deathly-sick-that-no-medical-doctor-will-be-able-to-solve.html

================================================================================

More research confirms: There is definitely a link between autism and mercury

Wednesday, December 27, 2017 by Isabelle Z.

As some people continue to deny that there is a link between autism spectrum disorder and mercury, a pair of new studies have now been added to the growing pile of evidence illustrating just how wrong they are.

The research involved meta-analysis of studiesinvestigating the link between mercury and autism spectrum disorder that were carried out over the past 12 years. This type of study is highly advantageous as it allows researchers to consolidate vast piles of research, which can often be complex and even conflicting.

The first meta-analysis, which was carried out by researchers from the Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences in Iran, was focused specifically on mercury. The second one, which was conducted by Tehran University of Medical Sciences researchers, looked at mercury as well as other heavy metals like lead. In both cases, cutting-edge statistical techniques were used to yield unbiased results.

These meta-analyses investigated the mercury levels in various types of specimens, including hair, urine, whole blood, and red blood cells, with the first one also exploring brain tissue. In both studies, a significantly higher concentration of mercury was found in the red blood cells belonging to people with autism spectrum disorder compared to healthy controls. The first one also noted higher levels of mercury in whole blood taken from patients with autism spectrum disorder.

Mercury is a very powerful neurotoxin that can lead to negative effects even in small amounts. Most people are exposed to mercury either via methylmercury in fish or ethylmercury, which can be found in the controversial vaccine preservative thimerosal.

According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, fetuses and small children are especially vulnerable to the negative effects of mercury, which include mental retardation, blindness, brain damages, seizures, incoordination, and an inability to speak.

This leads one to wonder why public health officials continue to push annual flu shots on the masses. Many of these shots contain mercury-laden thimerosal. In fact, guidelines for the flu vaccine say that all kids aged six months or older need the shot. These vaccines are also routinely pushed on pregnant women and those who might become pregnant – precisely the groups of people who should be going nowhere near anything that contains even the tiniest amount of mercury!

Mercury is capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier, and it is believed to raise the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders like tics, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and speech delays in addition to autism spectrum disorder.

Link between mercury and autism long established

Scientists have long known about the link between the mercury in childhood vaccinescontaining thimerosal and autism. A 2004 study, for example, found a close correlation between the prevalence of autism and mercury doses in MMR vaccines from the late 1980s up through the mid-‘90s. The authors of that study, which was published in the peer-reviewed Medical Science Monitor, recommended that all vaccines stop using thimerosal.

It’s interesting to note that studies have also shown a strong correlation between mercury fillings in mothers and their children’s risk of being diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders. For example, an Egyptian study published in the Metabolic Brain Disease journal found such a connection, in addition to the finding that kids who had autism spectrum disorder also had high biomarkers for mercury and lead compared to their healthy siblings and healthy controls.

Of course, you won’t hear about these studies in the mainstream media. It’s not a coincidence that so many of these studies are taking place outside of the U.S. and UK. Several American studies have made similar findings, but Big Pharma is a formidable opponent doing everything in its power to suppress them.

Sources include: WorldMercuryProject.org NaturalNews.com NaturalNews.com

za: http://www.vaccines.news/2017-12-27-more-research-confirms-there-is-a-link-between-autism-and-mercury.html

====================================================================================

Dengue vaccine does NOT protect against the disease but actually puts you at HIGHER RISK of contracting it

Monday, December 18, 2017 by Tracey Watson

The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that Dengue, a mosquito-borne viral infection common in tropical and sub-tropical areas across the globe, has become increasingly prevalent in recent years, with about half the world’s population at risk of the disease. The WHO notes that a dengue vaccine is available for use in people between the ages of 9 and 45 who live in affected areas, but Sanofi Pasteur – the vaccine’s manufacturer – is now admitting that the “shot” is not guaranteed to prevent dengue, and could potentially create more issues than it solves.

There are two forms of this disease: Dengue fever and severe dengue. The WHO explains the difference as follows:

Dengue fever is a severe, flu-like illness that affects infants, young children and adults, but seldom causes death. …

Severe dengue is a potentially deadly complication due to plasma leaking, fluid accumulation, respiratory distress, severe bleeding, or organ impairment. Warning signs occur 3–7 days after the first symptoms in conjunction with a decrease in temperature (below 38°C/100°F) and include: severe abdominal pain, persistent vomiting, rapid breathing, bleeding gums, fatigue, restlessness and blood in vomit. The next 24–48 hours of the critical stage can be lethal; proper medical care is needed to avoid complications and risk of death.

So, severe dengue is far more dangerous than “ordinary” dengue fever. In fact, severe dengue is one of the leading causes of serious illness and even death among children in certain Asian and Latin American countries.

Earlier this month, at a press conference in Manila, Philippines, Dr. Ng Su Peing, Sanofi’s global medical head, admitted that not only is the company’s vaccine, known as Dengvaxia, not necessarily effective at preventing the disease, but it can actually cause a previously uninfected person to get the virus. Even worse, it causes not just ordinary dengue fever, but severe dengue.

Rappler reported:

Dengvaxia increases the risk of contracting severe dengue for those who got the vaccine without prior infection.

This is why Peing said she would not recommend Dengvaxia for those who have not been infected with dengue.

Sanofi’s argument is that most people in dengue-affected areas have already had the disease at some point, and the vaccine protects those who have already been infected for six years. However, that thinking is flawed, because people who have already been infected with the virus will have built up antibodies, and therefore don’t need a preventative vaccine, anyway!

While Sanofi insists that the vaccine was proven to be both safe and effective during clinical trials, they now admit that continued tests over the years have painted a different picture.

A follow-up study five years after the initial trials showed that at least five more out of every 1,000 participants who had been vaccinated went on to develop dengue fever, while an additional two patients developed the more serious severe dengue, when compared to previously uninfected people who did not receive the vaccine. (Related: Researchers openly admit dengue vaccine would cause 7-fold spike in infections.)

“We noted at longer-term an increased risk of hospitalization and severe dengue in the vaccinated people without a prior dengue infection, compared to [the] placebo [participants],” Peing admitted.

The FDA has now suspended distribution of Dengvaxia in the Philippines.

Though dengue fever outbreaks have occurred all over the world, including in Hawaii and other parts of the United States, it is not a common illness in our country. Nonetheless, Sanofi’s admission should make people around the world sit up and take note, because like with so many other vaccines, the public was assured of the safety and efficacy of this vaccine, with reputable organizations like the WHO backing its use. Now it has turned out to be both useless and dangerous. (Related: Discover the real risks at Vaccines.news)

Should that not make us wonder about all those other vaccines that they keep assuring us are safe and effective?

Sources include: Rappler.com NewsInfo.Inquirer.net WHO.int

za: http://www.vaccines.news/2017-12-18-dengue-vaccine-does-not-protect-against-the-disease-but-actually-puts-you-at-higher-risk-for-contracting-it.html

====================================================================================

U.S. healthcare workers do NOT have health freedom: 69 employees FIRED for refusing flu vaccination

Wednesday, December 20, 2017 by Jayson Veley

Health freedom? What health freedom?

According to BMJ.com, a total of 69 staff members at Essentia Health have been fired for refusing to get the flu vaccination. As for hundreds of other Essentia workers, getting the flu shot was the only real option that they had, considering the fact that they were warned that they would lose their jobs if they failed to be vaccinated before a November 20 deadline.

Essentia Health operates 15 hospitals and 75 clinics in the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, North Dakota and Idaho, and employs roughly 14,000 people.

There are multiple issues with this that need to be addressed. First and foremost, even though companies have the final say over the standards employees must meet in order to continue working there, Essentia Health could have perhaps been more understanding and accommodating to those who refused to get the flu vaccines because of legitimate medical concerns. Strongly recommending that employees get the vaccine instead of threatening to fire them if they don’t, for example, may have been a better approach. The United States was founded on the principles of self-governance and individual liberty, and all companies, regardless of whether or not they are in the medical industry, should respect that.

Second, it’s important to note that flu vaccinations may not be as safe and as effective as most people think they are. At the very least, there is a vigorous and ongoing debate in this country over the safety of flu vaccines, and Essentia Health should have taken that into account as well before threatening to fire employees who refused to get vaccinated.

A few months ago, Natural News founder Mike Adams reported on a groundbreaking studyconducted by the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, which found that women who receive the flu vaccine end up developing a weaker immune system in subsequent years. The studies lead researcher, Lisa Christian, Ph.D., concluded, “Growing evidence shows that those who received a flu shot in the prior year have lower antibody responses in the current year.”

Mike Adams went on to provide further commentary on the Ohio State University study, arguing that there is a substantial amount of evidence that suggests that flu vaccines actually make people less safe rather than more safe, even though much of the country believes otherwise. “Far from offering bulletproof protection, flu shots actually make people more vulnerable to influenza infections, which of course contributes to more people catching the flu and then falsely thinking they need more flu shots for ‘more protection,’” he explained. (Related: Here are four rational and legitimate reasons to avoid getting the flu shot and what you can do instead to protect your health.)

Never one to leave Natural News readers without the facts, the Health Ranger listed off some significant and eye-opening statistics regarding just how unsafe flu vaccinations can be, including the fact that those who got the flu shot in 2008 had a 250 percent increase in influenza infections in subsequent years, and the fact that mercury-laced flu vaccines resulted in a 4,259 percent increase in fetal deaths throughout the 2009 flu season. As a result of the flu vaccine’s ability to weaken the immune system, Adams also noted that “people who get flu shots will be the first to die in an actual global pandemic.”

Even though Essentia Health may legally be allowed to fire employees for not complying with the company’s medical standards and vaccine requirements, it doesn’t make it right, especially when one considers the fact that there is a substantial amount of evidence that suggests that the flu vaccine isn’t very safe in the first place.

Sources include: BMJ.com NaturalNews.com

za: http://www.vaccines.news/2017-12-20-u-s-healthcare-workers-do-not-have-health-freedom-69-employees-fired-for-refusing-flu-vaccination.html

====================================================================================

Is Autism a side effect of metal toxicity? High aluminum concentrations discovered in brain tissue of autistic children

Sunday, December 17, 2017 by David Williams

It’s a well-known fact that even the smallest amount of aluminum, if found in a person’s brain tissue, can become a huge problem. There have also been many studies that look into how having high-levels of aluminum in brain tissue is correlated with neurological conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease. Now a new study puts the spotlight on autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and tests to see if there might be a connection between it and having high-levels of aluminum in the brain.

The study, which was first published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, shows some of the highest levels of aluminum ever recorded in human brain tissue. The data was gathered from the brains of 10 donors who had ASD. The study was lead by Dr. Christopher Exley, one of the world’s leading experts on aluminum toxicity, from Keele University.

Using a carefully-crafted two-pronged study method, the researchers of the study were able to measure and characterize aluminum deposits found in the brain tissues of the 10 ASD donors, most of whom reportedly died in their teens or twenties. The results of the study show “consistently high” aluminum levels based on data from both the quantitative component as well as its qualitative component, which is said to represent “some of the highest values for brain aluminum content ever measured in healthy or diseased tissues.”

Findings of the research

The study is interesting for its use of a two-pronged approach that contains both a quantitative as well as a qualitative component. The former required the use of graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry or GRAAS, which measures aluminum content in frozen brain tissue samples; the latter uses a technique called fluorescence microscopy to visualize aluminum deposits in the brain. In total, the researchers were able to quantify aluminum levels in 59 tissue samples that were sourced from five different areas of the brain.

After testing, the researchers found that all samples showed a “pathologically significant” level of aluminum, certainly more than what might be considered normal. Male brains in particular showed high aluminum levels, including that from a 15-year old boy with ASD who ended up being the one with the single highest brain aluminum measurement. And as for how exactly all that aluminum ended up in their brains, the research results strongly suggest that it was due to cells that entered while loaded with aluminum in the periphery.

The case is made for the entrance of the aluminum through aluminum adjuvants in vaccines, which are used by vaccine manufacturers to intensify the immune response of vaccine recipients. According to the researchers, the use of aluminum-adjuvant-containing vaccines “has been directly correlated with increasing prevalence of ASD,” particularly in teens and young adults.

Implications for the future

More than half a decade ago, in 2011, a separate study showed that children from countries with the highest ASD prevalence also had the highest exposure to aluminum from vaccines. This goes along nicely with the findings of Dr. Exley, who notes that, “There are no ‘normal’ levels of brain aluminum.” Meaning, “its presence in brain tissue, at any level, could be construed as abnormal.”

Based on the results and conclusions of the study, it may be time to take a closer look at how vaccines are administered, especially since more and more children and teenagers are getting them with each passing day. Not only for the risk of reducing the rates of ASD but also to prevent other conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease. Of course, implementing rules that will change things for the better is a different matter entirely. Time well tell whether or not this improves in the future.

Read more about autism in AutismTruthNews.com.

Sources include: WorldMercuryProject.org WorldMercuryProject.org ^[PDF] NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov

za: http://www.vaccines.news/2017-12-17-is-autism-a-side-effect-of-metal-toxicity-high-aluminum-concentrations-discovered-brain-tissue.html

========================================================================

Are flu shots causing women to have more miscarriages?

Monday, November 06, 2017 by JD Heyes

A soon-to-be-released study that experts have called “puzzling” has found an association between women who got back-to-back annual flu shots between 2010-2012 and higher incidences of miscarriage.

As reported by The Associated Press, health experts are said to be set to attribute the higher rate to other factors — older age and other risks of miscarriage women normally face — but thus far no one’s really been able to explain the apparent flu vaccine correlation.

But already, propagandists at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are swinging into action, ‘reaching out’ to a physician’s organization, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, “to warn them the study is coming out and help them prepare for a potential wave of worry” from mothers expecting a child, the AP reported.

Not only that, as ABC News added, two peer-reviewed medical journals rejected the study before a third one, Vaccine, decided it was worth publishing. And while Dr. Gregory Poland, Vaccine’s editor-in-chief, said he personally doesn’t believe that vaccines are responsible for the miscarriages, he at least had the guts to allow the study to be published, deeming it well-designed and raising a question that should not be ignored.

ABC News noted further:

Flu and its complications kill thousands of Americans every year. The elderly, young children and pregnant women are especially at risk. When a new “swine flu” strain emerged in 2009, it killed 56 U.S. pregnant women that year, according to the CDC.

The authors of the study, which include two researchers from the CDC, said they saw a very noticeable difference when they examined data on women who had miscarried within a 28-day window after getting a flu shot that was also supposed to protect against swine flu — but only when the same women had received a flu shot from the previous year.

Researchers found 17 of 486 miscarriages involving women whose vaccinations followed that pattern, while only four of a comparable 485 pregnancies involved women who had been vaccinated the same way.

Of the higher group, researchers noted that it was comprised of more women who were already at higher risk for miscarriage. Researchers then attempted to make statistical adjustments to compensate for many of those factors.

As you may have expected, there are plenty of naysayers and people within the medical, scientific, and Big Pharma establishments who are discounting the new findings out of hand, because of course if the research can be duplicated, vaccines — and especially flu vaccines — would take another huge credibility hit. But that new research shouldn’t be long in coming: Some of the same scientists who worked on the current study have already begun follow-up research to see if their work can be duplicated and, thus, their preliminary findings substantiated. (Related: Flu shots during pregnancy lead to a 4,250 percent increase in fetal deaths.)

This is the second major hit to the vaccine industry in less than a week. As Natural News founder/editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, reported on Saturday, new proof demonstrates that flu shots “are the greatest medical fraud in the history of the world.”

He wrote:

My independent atomic elemental analysis of flu vaccines, published in the summer of 2014, proved that flu vaccines contain over 50 ppm mercury, an extremely toxic heavy metal linked to kidney failure, birth defects, spontaneous abortions and neurological damage. This finding has never been refuted by anyone. In fact, it was affirmed by vaccine proponents who insisted that it is perfectly safe to inject pregnant women, young children and senior citizens with mercury even though the flu vaccine insert itself readily admits there is no scientific evidence whatsoever to support the safety and efficacy of the vaccine in such groups.

Believe it or not, there are still millions of people, doctors, pharmacists and even journalists who do not yet realize there is a very high concentration of mercury in influenza vaccines given to pregnant women, children and senior citizens.

What’s more, Adams’ research underscores another fact that has direct relevance to the upcoming study involving flu vaccines and miscarriages: Packaging makes it clear that safety for flu shot vaccine administration in pregnant women has never been established.

We’ll be keeping an eye out for follow-up studies and research related to this potentially huge risk to pregnant women.

J.D. Heyes is a senior writer for NaturalNews.com and NewsTarget.com, as well as editor of The National Sentinel.

Sources include: Vaccines.news AP.org ABCNews.com

za; http://www.vaccines.news/2017-11-06-are-flu-shots-causing-women-to-have-more-miscarriages.html

===========================================================================

Dr. Paul Offit’s aluminum deceptions and academic misconduct

Thursday, November 02, 2017 by News Editors

“Parents can be reassured that the trace quantities of aluminum in vaccines can’t possibly do harm.”
-Dr Paul Offit: Vaccine promoter, vaccine patent licensor, and autism pundit, 2015

NOTE: Since this article as written (in 2015), CHOP and Offit removed some of their statements quoted here. I suppose they realized their statements were indefensible. This article is not maintained to track the latest nonsense from CHOP/Offit about aluminum adjuvant.

(Article republished from VaccinePapers.org)

Dr Paul Offit is a well-known vaccine advocate and doctor at the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), where he is director of the Vaccine Information Center. The rotavirus vaccine he developed made Offit very rich. He vigorously defends vaccines in the media, often with half-truths and outright lies.

In order to defend vaccines and vaccine safety claims, Dr. Offit must also defend the practice of injecting children with aluminum adjuvant, despite the absence of evidence for safety, and substantial evidence of harm. On the CHOP website here (CHOP – Vaccines and Aluminum), Dr Offit states the following:

Aluminum and pregnancy
Aluminum quantities fluctuate naturally during normal cellular activity. It is found in all tissues and is also believed to play an important role in the development of a healthy fetus. This is supported by several findings:
*During healthy pregnancies the amount of aluminum in a woman’s blood increases.
*The amount of aluminum in the blood of the fetus increases between four and a half and six months gestation and again at eight months gestation.
*At delivery, the blood of full-term infants contains more aluminum than the mother’s, but it decreases shortly after delivery.
*The blood of premature infants has more aluminum than that of full-term infants.
*The concentrations of aluminum in brain tissue are high during gestation and highest immediately after birth.
*The breast milk of moms with premature infants contains more aluminum than that of moms who carried their babies to term.”

The CHOP page on aluminum is here: CHOP/Offit Statement on Aluminum

In these statements Dr Offit is asserting that aluminum is a nutrient, i.e. a mineral with healthful functions in the human body. This is absolutely false. Aluminum has no healthful function in the body or any living thing. It is a toxin and a toxin only, to all life forms.

The fact that aluminum concentrations increase in the blood and change in some tissues does not in any way mean or suggest that aluminum is doing good or necessary functions. Its just moving around the body as all substances are known to do. Blood lead levels can also increase during pregnancy. Of course, this doesn’t mean that lead is a nutrient or has “an important role” in the development of a healthy fetus. The only “role” lead plays in a fetus is damaging the fetus. It is the same with aluminum.

These statements by Dr Offit are deceptive and unscientific. Dr Offit is deceiving those that are not well educated in nutrition or medicine. This behavior by Dr Offit is shameful.

What is actually happening with aluminum blood levels during pregnancy is that aluminum is being mobilized from the bone. The bone is a storage site for aluminum, just as it is for lead. Toxic metals in bone tend to cause less damage than other places, like the brain. So putting toxic metals in bone minimizes the harm they cause. During pregnancy, minerals are drawn out of bones to be used by the developing fetus. This is well known. Consequently, toxic metals stored in the bone are released as well. Both aluminum and lead are released by bone de-mineralization during pregnancy.

Consider this case report of a woman that experienced a 3-fold rise in blood lead levels during pregnancy, caused by lead being mobilized from the bone. The same thing happens with aluminum. Its ridiculous to say that this means aluminum or lead “plays an important role” in the fetus.

“We report the case of an adult female who had last been exposed to lead 7 years earlier but now presented with symptoms and findings of acute lead poisoning which we treated with chelation therapy. In the absence of an acute lead exposure, her increased lead levels were likely due to increased mobilization and redistribution from mineralized tissues during and after a recent pregnancy.”

Full paper: Lead Poisoning in an Adult: Lead Mobilization by Pregnancy

Increase in blood levels during pregnancy does not mean that aluminum is “playing an important role in the development of a healthy fetus”.

Offit the Illogical
Dr Offit seems to think that the following observations are evidence that aluminum is a nutrient with beneficial, healthful functions in a fetus. Offit says the following on the CHOP website:

*The blood of premature infants has more aluminum than that of full-term infants.”
*The breast milk of moms with premature infants contains more aluminum than that of moms who carried their babies to term.“

In view of the well known and proven toxic effects of aluminum, its exactly the opposite. Elevated aluminum in preemies is not a sign the aluminum is doing good, but rather that it’s causing harm. Aluminum is likely a cause of preterm births. A preterm infant is not a healthy infant. Preterm birth is a definite sign of poor health.

Lead and other toxic pollutants are also associated with preterm births, and widely believed to cause them. A recent review states:

“Lead exposure in relation to birth outcomes has been well-reviewed. Andrews and colleagues (1994) summarized early findings, including several occupational studies, reporting that Pb exposure was likely associated with increased risk of preterm birth, and that the effects were dose-dependent. “

Full paper (see pages 15-16): Environmental contaminant exposures and preterm birth: A comprehensive review

Offit’s preposterous illogic implies that lead should be considered a nutrient thats beneficial for babies. Offit is either being deceptive and dishonest, or he does not understand basic scientific reasoning.

A Deceptive Citation
To support these wrong and deceptive statements, Dr Offit references a well-known but old (1986) paper on aluminum toxicity, by Ganrot. The Ganrot paper is a lengthly review of the evidence that aluminum is harmful to various tissues and biological processes. Ganrot never suggests that aluminum is benign or beneficial. Ganrot states:

“Aluminum(Al) is present in very small amounts in living organisms but is abundant in the environment. In no case has Al been shown to have a definite biological function. Taken together, this suggests that Aluminum possesses properties incompatible with fundamental life processes. Despite this, Al has generally been regarded as virtually biologically inert and the interest shown for its biochemistry and metabolism has been very limited. However, during recent years, an increasing number of toxic effects have been established.” (emphasis added)

Full Paper (Ganrot): Metabolism and Possible Health Effects of Aluminum

By listing the Ganrot paper as a supporting reference, Dr Offit is mischaracterizing Ganrot. This is academic misconduct. At academic institutions, academic misconduct is considered an offense potentially as egregious as plagiarism, cheating or falsifying data.

As of May 2017, CHOP and Offit are still citing the Ganrot paper.

Offit Lies About Aluminum Exposure
In a video statement (here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8H3sOzma22U) Offit claims that aluminum intake from food and water is far higher than aluminum exposure from vaccines. This is absolutely wrong because only a small fraction of ingested aluminum is absorbed into the body. Ingested aluminum absorption is about 0.1-1%, typically about 0.3%. Specifically, Offit states:

“…you are much more likely to have aluminum in your circulation if you inject it than if you ingest it. But the point is that there’s so much more aluminum in the environment, either in the food you eat or the water you drink, than you would ever get as a shot in vaccines. That even though there is that difference between injection and ingestion, there is logarithmically so much more aluminum that you ingest that you actually have far more aluminum in your circulation because of what you eat and drink than you would ever get from vaccines.“

For the vaccines given in the first 6 months of life, this statement is exactly wrong. The truth is the opposite of what Offit says. In infants, vaccines produce far higher exposure to aluminum than food.

Vaccines in the first 6 months of the CDC vaccine schedule contain about 3,675 mcg aluminum:
Birth (Hep B): 74 mcg/kg (250 mcg for 3.4 kg infant)
2 month: 245 mcg/kg (1225 mcg for 5 kg infant)
4 month: 150 mcg/kg (975 mcg for 6.5 kg infant)
6 month: 153 mcg/kg (1225 mcg for 8 kg infant)

Total for 0-6 months: 3675 mcg aluminum

Compare this to aluminum absorption (for infants) over the first 6 months from milk and formula. The total amount ingested must be multiplied by 0.3% to obtain the amount actually absorbed into the body. Aluminum content numbers come from CHOP, and I have confirmed them in the scientific literature:
breastmilk: 7mg x 0.3% = 21 mcg (0.021 mg)
formula: 38mg x 0.3% = 114 mcg (0.114 mg)
soy formula: 117mg x 0.3% = 351 mcg (0.351mg)

The most appropriate comparison is with breastmilk, because infants are adapted to consume milk, not formula. Some scientists (e.g. Dr Chris Exley) are concerned that infant formula contains harmful levels of aluminum.

In the first 6 months of life, aluminum exposure from vaccines is 3,675/21 = 175 times higher than human milk. Infants receive far more aluminum from vaccines than from milk. For soy formula (an unhealthy choice), the ratio is: 3,675/351 = 10.5 times higher than human milk.

Giving a baby 175X more aluminum than normal exposure from milk is alarming to anyone with common sense.

Twisting the Science
In 2003, Dr Offit (with another author) published a paper seeking to dispel concerns about toxic vaccine ingredients.
Full paper: Addressing Parents’ Concerns: Do Vaccines Contain Harmful Preservatives, Adjuvants, Additives, or Residuals?

Dr Offit’s paper has a section on aluminum, which states:

“For determining the quantity of aluminum below which safety is likely, data were generated in mice that were inoculated orally with various quantities of aluminum lactate.42 No adverse reactions were observed when mice were fed quantities of aluminum as high as 62 mg/kg/day. By applying uncertainty factors of 3 (for extrapolation to humans) and 10 (for human variability), the ATSDR concluded that the minimum risk level for exposure to aluminum was 2 mg/kg/day.43 The half-life of elimination of aluminum from the body is approximately 24 hours.41 Therefore, the burden of aluminum to which infants are exposed in food36–40 and vaccines (Table 3) is clearly less than the guideline established by the ATSDR and far less than that found to be safe in experimental animals.41,42” (emphasis added)
ATSDR= Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, a federal government agency

The citation for the underlined statement is: (Golub): Effects of Aluminum Ingestion on Spontaneous Motor Activity in Mice

The Golub study in fact reported two adverse effects from the 62mg/kg/day dosage.

The Golub paper describes a 6-week feeding study in mice. 3 groups of mice received the following dosages of aluminum salts:
Control (CON) : 3mg/kg/day
Low (LO) : 62mg/kg/day
High (HI) : 130mg/kg/day

Offit’s Lie
In the Golub study, 11 signs of toxicity were monitored: irritability, respiratory discharge, eye discharge, fur loss, abnormal paw placement, abnormal gait, hindlimb splaying, hindlimb dragging, opisthotonos, paralysis and seizures.

Golub found that the “LO” aluminum group (receiving 62mg/kg/day) suffered fur loss. Golub states:

“After the first week of Al exposure, mice began to show a localized loss of fur on the tip of the snout that was identified by veterinarians as a low level sign of poor condition in the colony. This condition was reported more frequently in the LO and HI Al groups than in the controls.”

Additionally, Golub found that the LO group mice (consuming 62mg/kg/day) had a “cyclic pattern of food intake”, a known sign of toxicity. Golub states:

“LO mice did not show as clear a cycling pattern but did have somewhat higher intake than controls on days 21-24, 33-36 and 36-39 and lower intake on days 24-27 (p=0.04-0.05 at these times).”
AND
“Food intake…followed a cyclic pattern similar to that seen in rodents eating diets deficient in a specific nutrient (2) or adulterated with a poison (17). “

So Golub clearly identifies the cyclic food intake as an adverse, toxic effect, even though it was not among the 11 signs listed.

Dr Offit’s statement about the Golub study is false.

Offit’s Entire Safety Argument Is False
Offit’s safety argument is also used by the Mitkus 2011 study, which is debunked here: //vaccinepapers.org/debunking-aluminum-adjuvant-part-2/

Vaccination, the Poisonous Paradigm

So many doctors and nurses routinely state on social media that in all their years of practice, they’ve never seen a serious vaccine reaction… but they have.

If they’ve never seen any clinically obvious severe reactions, it’s likely because children suffering them are generally rushed from home straight to the ER, not back to the clinic or office where the vaccines were given.

To wit, the testimony of pediatrician Dr. Toni Bark, who tells us that while in her position as Director of a hospital pediatric emergency room she’d initially been very upset if parents brought in children who weren’t up to date on vaccines, but her attitude soon changed, and changed drastically. She began to see patterns:

“Children who were seen in the vaccine clinic would then come to our ER with seizures, respiratory arrest and asthma attacks. I began to realize, not all children respond well tovaccination and in fact, some die.” (1)

And from an ER nurse who calls himself Guerilla RN:

“As an E.R. nurse, I have seen the cover up. Where do you think kids go when they have a vaccine reaction? They go to the E.R. They come to me…The child comes in with either a fever approaching 105, or seizures, or lethargy/can’t wake up, or sudden overwhelming sickness, screaming that won’t stop, spasms, GI inclusion, etc.” (2)

However, there are a few reactions doctors and nurses see rather routinely, but don’t recognize as potentially serious. Nor, for the most part, do parents – at least, initially. The recognition comes weeks, perhaps months later, as the vaccine damage scenario unfolds and the parent digs deep for answers.

Two common reactions that are actually red flags are hidden in plain sight: fever; and nausea. Fever’s at the top of the list of reported reactions, by far, with nausea / vomiting close behind. Were it not for the utter lack in their medical educations of substantive information about the list of vaccine ingredients and the nature of the injuries they cause, doctors and nurses might stop to think about the serious implications.

After natural exposure to potential pathogens, and then only if a resulting infection develops, symptoms won’t display ‘til after an incubation period.

As per the Mayo Clinic, chickenpox symptoms, for instance, don’t display until 10 to 21 days after exposure (3); pertussis, 7 to 10 days (4); Hepatitis B, 2 weeks to 4 months! post-infection (5); and so on. Seattle Children’s Hospital, meanwhile, tells us the following, which most of us know from experience anyway: “Fever with most vaccines begins within 12 hours and lasts 2 to 3 days. This is normal.” (6)

How preposterous! No, it’s not normal – common to vaccination, but not normal. Developing within only hours of the shots, post-vaccination fevers are unnatural; foreign. They aren’t related to the respective supposedly vaccine-preventable infectious illnesses in the traditional sense.

Fever following natural exposure is an immune system mechanism designed to help the body eliminate and recover from the resulting infection – it’s “fighting for, not against the person.” (7) When it develops within hours of vaccination, it’s something other – there’s been no time for an infection to develop. It’s related to something intrinsic to the vaccine ingredients and the route of introduction, injection.

Fever is one of the first signs of encephalitis – brain inflammation (8). The Merck Manual (9) and Health and Human Services, on its Vaccine Injury Table (10), both tell us that vaccines can cause encephalitis, and encephalitic reactions can occur within minutes. Moreover, brain inflammation can lead to brain damage – encephalopathy.

Indeed, more than one medical professional has stated the belief that every vaccine causes brain damage; that it’s just a matter of degree, individual to individual; toddler to toddler; infant to infant. Regardless, social media abounds with eyewitness accounts of post-vaccination fevers, even if short lived, ultimately proving to be but the first step down a long road of debilitating autoimmune and neurological disorders.

Nausea and vomiting are critical immune system functions, purposed to eliminate poisonous substances from the body. They occur when toxins reach the area postrema of the brain – the “vomiting center” – its importance highlighted by the fact that it’s one of the few areas of the brain where the blood-brain barrier is weak. The faculty at the University of Washington explain the mechanism this way:

“When a toxic substance enters the bloodstream it will get to the area postrema and maycause the animal to throw up. In this way, the animal protects itself by eliminating the toxicsubstance from its stomach before more harm can be done.” (11). Nothing could better emphasize the insidiousness of the vaccination paradigm.

Toxic – poisonous – substances are included in vaccines, and because of the route of introduction bypass the filtering, detoxifying organs of the body, entering the bloodstream directly from the muscle into which they’re injected. Nausea, then, as with fever, is an adverse reaction that cannot be viewed simply as minor, in that it literally indicates the introduction of poisons into the body. Moreover, as with fever again, nausea and vomiting may also be symptoms of encephalitis – of an encephalitic vaccine reaction – and can be a prelude to encephalopathy; to brain damage.

Let’s keep it simple. From the Oxford dictionary, the definition of poisonous:

1: (of a substance or plant) causing or capable of causing death or illness if taken into thebody. (12)

“Unavoidably unsafe” was the description of vaccines used by Congress in 1986, in its discussions surrounding the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and repeated by SCOTUS in its 2010 Breusewitz decision. Though the most egregious damage is done to the very young, vaccines unarguably cause great pain and grief to many people, of all ages.

They are by definition, then, poisonous.

Vaccines trigger fever, nausea and vomiting because substances they contain are toxins, are poisons. We have an outrageous, untenable situation, where even the most commonly reported reactions to vaccines, couched as minor and of no concern, are in reality indications of injury, potentially severe, potentially life-altering, potentially fatal.

They can occur days or weeks post-vaccination – HHS lists the DTaP and MMR vaccines as causes of encephalitis for up to three days and two weeks, respectively. Yet, pediatricians and nurses don’t consider the implications, in large part, obviously, because of the egregious lack of relevant information in their medical educations about the known! list of toxic vaccine ingredients.

Nor are they taught the sorry histories of vaccine-induced severe autoimmune and neurological disorders that at this point have received going on $4 billion in compensation, from a national vaccine court that few people even know exists.

Most unacceptably, it’s obvious at this point that there are many medical professionals who even though they’re aware of the list of vaccine ingredients, avoid considering how heinous can be the consequences. They simply don’t want to rock the professional boat, or disturb the bottom line.

They prefer living in the illusory world of benefits vs risk, willfully shunning the basic creed of: first do no harm. Of the many issues of trust I’ve covered in the five years of my show, the most disturbing will always be: the responsibility of the provider. One pediatrician told us in interview that his colleagues are so reluctant to discuss vaccines, the cognitive dissonance so strong, that they won’t even allow their curiosity to be aroused. Nothing could be more chilling.

References

za; https://vactruth.com/2018/01/06/vaccination-the-poisonous-paradigm/

==========================================================================

Business of Birth

INFLUENCE & PSYCHOLOGY

By Phil Silberman / November 26, 2017

Your baby is a target. She may be a twinkle in your eye, or floating comfortably within your womb, or she may be 40 years old with children of her own. To the massive and deeply corrupt pharmaceutical industry, she, and every other man, woman, and child on the planet, are seen as merely an endless source of revenue.

According to industry magazine “Pharmaceutical Commerce” the projected global growth rate for the pharmaceutical industry is 6.3% through 2022, up from the 5% for the 2014-2020 period. Total revenue for the industry is expected to reach $1.12 TRILLION dollars by 2022. Nearly half (45%) of that according to “GEN, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News” will be from vaccines. So, don’t believe it when the claim is made that vaccines are not a big money maker.

The world vaccines market is predicted to increase at an even higher compound annual rate than the rest of the industry; reaching a rate of 7.6% during 2013–2022. Revenue from vaccines is expected to “reach $45.1 billion in 2022 as new product introductions continue and usage of current products expands further.”

In May of 2017, Resolution 327 was offered in Congress “Recognizing the importance of vaccinations and immunizations in the United States.” It is curious that the authors and 35 co-sponsors felt a need to recognize both “vaccinations and immunizations”. Typically, in legislation and articles on the subject, these words are synonyms for the magic shots that will render the recipient ‘immune’ from the intended disease.

One would not, for example, expect to see a resolution recognizing the cuteness of both baby dogs and puppies. Perhaps the authors of 327 secretly understand that vaccines do not actually confer immunization, that vaccines and immunity are two very distinct, different things.

Vaccines are injected pharmaceutical products promoted for use from before the cradle to days before the grave and sold under the pretense of providing some semblance of pathogenic immunity. (As a lover of words, I think it is important to remember that the root word of ‘vaccines’ is ‘vacca’. No, not ‘vacay’, as in ‘vacation’. ‘Vacca’, as in Latin for ‘cow’. Why is this? Because the first smallpox vaccine was pus which oozed out of the udders of cowpox infected cows and was then smeared into an incision on the ~~victim’s~~ , oops, patient’s arm.)

Immunization, however, is a body’s recognition of and effective defense against a given disease. Immunization occurs within a healthy immune system (notice the etymological connection there?) and a strong immune system is never created by injecting foreign, complex manufactured chemical compounds into one’s muscle mass but by good nutrition, adequate rest, and plenty of clean water. Unless quoting a law that uses the terminology, I therefore avoid using the overused misnomer; ‘immunization’ in reference to shots of any kind.

As a citizen of these United States, a resident of the great state of Colorado, a father, and a passionate participant in this thing called Democracy I felt it was my duty and responsibility to reach out my Congresswoman, Diana DeGette, in an attempt to communicate my concerns about this resolution. This particular Representative of the Denver metro area is so enamored with all things pharmaceutical that I literally thought her last campaign brochure was an ad for the pharmaceutical industry.

Even though the industry is one of the most profitable industries in the world, she felt compelled to give them massive taxpayer funded subsidies with her so-called “Healthy People 2020” initiative. I explained to her that the proposed resolution is nothing more than a pledge of fealty to the pharmaceutical industry.

The industry already has more lobbyists than any other industry. More than aerospace. More than guns. More than agriculture. According to Open Secrets, in 2016 the pharmaceutical industry channeled more than $20 million to lawmakers. To make matters worse, the industry also has a strangle hold on America’s media.

The industry’s own sources reported that advertisements inundating news broadcasts and daytime TV have increased 62% since 2012. Imagine how much media control pharmaceutical companies purchased with the $6 billion they spent on advertising last year. Do you really think that with that much revenue coming from the industry that the nightly news would air an unbiased reports on vaccines?

Vaccine manufacturers clearly do not need our elected Representatives’ subservient acquiescence. The citizens of this country however, do need our lawmakers to have a modicum of integrity and not be whores fulfilling the every desire of the vaccine industry.

In the United States of America each individual state presently has autonomy regarding their vaccine laws. California, for example, with the passage of SB 277 in 2015, effectively eliminated all parental vaccine choice. Medical exemptions are technically still available under California’s law but doctors providing them are being systematically persecuted. Every child, every shot. No exemptions. No exceptions.

States such as Colorado, on the other hand, are preserving medical freedom by pushing back against Pharma backed legislation and persistently working hard to protect the rights of citizens over the profits of corporations. The Colorado legislature, recognizing the inherent values of freedom and personal sovereignty, has steadfastly protected the rights of parents to choose what does and does not get injected into their children’s bodies.

Congressional Resolution 327 is particularly troubling in light of what other multi-national corporate interests have achieved in the ravaging of our country’s legislative integrity. When the tiny state of Vermont had the audacity to pass a consumer protective, mandatory GMO labeling law, Monsanto swooped in and immediately pushed through a much weaker, voluntary national GMO (non)labeling law. The national law effectively nullified the efforts and intentions of the people of Vermont.

Citizens in every state are now effectively organized to protect medical freedom and it will not be surprising to see legislators at the federal level coming to the aid of their corporate sponsors to force compulsory vaccinations upon all Americans.

As seen in California’s draconian SB 277, it is the desire of the pharmaceutical industry and their legislative cronies to have unlimited enforcement authority over an unlimited number of vaccinations. This should be of grave concern to all of us regardless of religious beliefs or political affiliations. Every citizen of these United States, and every citizen of the world for that matter, has (or should have) the right to informed consent.

We hold the imperative to be deeply informed about the ingredients, effects, and functionality of vaccines so that we can wisely decide upon their use or their avoidance. It is critical for responsible citizens to be cognizant of the control the pharmaceutical industry has upon the official narrative about disease and health. Hint: the official story corresponds to reality about as much as your grade school history lessons about Christopher Columbus do.

The official story and those who repeat it would have us believe that without our unwavering devotion to vaccines, western civilization would inevitably slide into a dark abyss of rampant disease and apocalyptic morbidity. The truth, however difficult it may be to come to terms with, is that vaccines such as those for polio and smallpox have, in fact, been introduced to the public at the end of the intended disease’s natural cycle and actually contributed not to those diseases demise but to their continuation.

Other vaccines such as the HepB shot AT BIRTH are, when considered with any semblance of logic or any remaining shred of ‘mother’s intuition’, ridiculously and dangerously unnecessary. The medical establishment has even conceded that the HepB shot is given at day one because well, what if that baby never comes to a doctor again? HepB is most often contracted by sharing dirty intravenous drug needles and by unprotected, promiscuous sex.

It can be transferred from a hepB positive mother to her infant but if you don’t have the disease your baby won’t either. So why this shot? Why on day one? Here’s the harsh reality: to train you. If they can convince you to give your new born child a shot that is so obviously unnecessary, they got you. You’ll do anything they say. Your submission is absolute. You are now the perfect, unquestioning consumer. Quite literally from cradle to grave.

Understand that the goal of the pharmaceutical industry is to create customers and from those customers squeeze out as much profit as possible. Period. As corporations, their responsibility it to their shareholders. They have a well documented history of selling many products in their other lines that knowingly caused severe injury and death of tens of thousands. They do not care.

Why or how could one assume that their vaccine divisions would be any different? Do you really think they produce these products out of some altruistic motive? Would the push for mandatory vaccinations exist if there was not such a massive profit motive? In 1986, faced with mounting lawsuits for vaccine induced injuries, the vaccine industry successfully blackmailed Congress to provide them with complete indemnity.

Rather than committing to make safer, more effective vaccines the industry threatened to cease all production of vaccines unless they were granted immunity from all prosecution. This, ironically, is the only true immunity ever offered by vaccines.

Parents, hold your baby close, no matter what his or her age. Marvel at her perfection. As you gaze at your child, ask yourself, are willing for your child to be used for target practice?

za: https://vactruth.com/2017/11/26/business-of-birth/

=================================================================================

Grypowa histeria 2018. Prof. M Majewska

PAHO/Flickr/CC BY-ND 2.0

W mediach szaleje kolejna histeria napędzania strachu przed epidemią grypy. Pojawiła się 10 lat po poprzedniej medialnej „pandemii” świńskiej grypy (2008/2009), którą pewne pamięta większość dorosłych osób. Tak jak w poprzedniej propagandzie, media straszą, że miliony ludzi w tym sezonie poumierają na grypę, jeśli się szybko nie zaszczepią. A tymczasem CDC (amerykańskie Centrum Kontroli Chorób) ogłosiło, że obecnie stosowane szczepionki są bezwartościowe i są skuteczne najwyżej w 10%, co należy interpretować, że 10% osób zaszczepionych nie zachoruje na grypę, a 90% ma duże szanse, że zachoruje i zarazi swe otoczenie. Dotychczasowe statystyki zachorowań i zgonów to potwierdzają. Chorują i umierają na grypę głównie osoby, które otrzymały szczepienia na grypę. Poniżej kilka linków nt.

Szczepienia grypowe zawsze zwiększały ryzyko nachorowania na grypę i zapalenie płuc oraz umieralność. Miliony osób, które dały kiedyś zaszczepić miały takie osobiste doświadczenia. Załączony wykres ilustruje, jak w USA wzrastała śmiertelność ludzi z powodu grypy i zapalenia płuc od czasu rozpowszechnienia szczepionek grypowych. Im wyższy był procent osób wyszczepionych (niebieska linia), tym bardziej wzrastała umieralność na te choroby (brązowa linia).

[przywołany wykres nie występuje w żadnej ze znalezionych przeze mnie wersji artykułu w sieci - admin AJ]

Obecnie stosowane szczepionki zawierają 3 lub 4 typy wirusów grypy. Niektóre zwierają rekombinowany materiał genetyczny. Teoretycznie szczepienne wirusy są one inaktywowane (osłabione), ale w praktyce wiemy, że często są aktywne, co sprawia, że u wielu osób wkrótce po szczepieniu wywołują grypę. Wiadomo z badań, że w procesie produkcji szczepionek podczas hodowli wirusów w jajkach lub w innych tkankach zwierzęcych wirusy te intensywnie mutują, więc nie wiadomo, jakie antygeny/wirusy znajdują się w ostatecznych szczepionkach. Żywe wirusy ze szczepionek mutują też w organizmach zaszczepionych osób, wywołując różne choroby z nowotworowymi włącznie.

Prawdopodobne, że producenci celowo wprowadzają do obrotu partie z aktywnymi wirusami, aby każdego roku wywołać epidemie. Szczepionki z tej samej partii są rozpraszane po całym kraju, dzięki czemu ogniska czy epidemie grypy wybuchają na raz w wielu regionach. Gdyby wysyłano takie „gorące” partie tylko do jednego miasta czy regionu i tam wszyscy zaszczepieni by ciężko zachorowali lub umarli, wówczas byłoby to bardzo widoczne. Rozproszone zgony poszczepienne są łatwiejsze do ukrycia. Warto też pamiętać, że obecnie prawie do wszystkich szczepionek dodaje się neurotoksyczne aluminium i do wielu dodaje się silnie neurotoksyczny thimerosal (związek rtęci).

Obecnie stosowane szczepionki grypowe

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/vaccine/vaccines.htm

http://vaxxter.com/statistical-revelations-seem-to-disprove-flu-mania/

http://vaxxter.com/vaccinated-boy-dies-flu-like-symptoms-michigan/

http://www.cbs8.com/story/37310685/12-year-old-boy-with-flu-like-symptoms-dies-after-virus-test-comes-back-negative

http://vaxxter.com/7-vaccinated-die-flu-santa-barbara/

Choroby zakaźne I zgony wywoływane przez inne szczepionki

http://www.vaccines.news/2017-11-06-new-york-times-confirms-natural-news-investigation-mumps-now-spread-by-vaccinated-children.html

http://www.vaccines.news/2016-02-25-doctors-whitewash-killing-of-infant-who-died-after-8-simultaneous-vaccinations.html

http://www.vaccines.news/2017-08-30-bombshell-united-nations-admits-latest-outbreak-of-polio-in-syria-was-caused-by-polio-vaccines.html

Prof. Maria Dorota Majewska
Źródło: Wolna Polska – Wiadomości

za; http://alexjones.pl/aj/aj-nwo/aj-kartel-farmaceutyczny/item/124953-grypowa-histeria-2018-prof-m-majewska