6203C19 SHSpec-122 The Bad "Auditor"

This lecture is based on HCOB 8Mar62 "The Bad "Auditor" and HCOB 15Mar62
"Suppressors".

A person who becomes a bad auditor has a concentration on a single
ability, like all aberration. Insanity is a "nothing else than". An insane
person does something to the exclusion of all else. The psychiatrist errs in
thinking that the conduct of the insane is insane, when what makes it insane
is the concentration on one area or behavior exclusively, to an intensity that
is contra-survival. If you did everything insane people do, you would be
acting sane. This avoidance mechanism is present in everyone to some degree,
but the case we are talking about (the bad "auditor") gets extreme reactions
to running the Revelation process. [See HCOB 8Mar62 "The Bad 'Auditor'".]

There is an interesting approach to a terror charge case that LRH used
once. He had the PC move to the beginning of track and scan forward to
present time. This got the PC stuck in the engram necessary to resolve the
case, which was where he was anyhow, and the terror turned on so hard that all
four legs of the couch started chattering on the floor. The PC found and ran
the incident and got the terror charge off.

If a person can have as much charge as that, imagine how much charge
could be trapped in a valence that is terrified through and through. Terror
is the result of something having appeared engramically and then threatening
to appear again. An emotional charge always has an incident of physical pain
underlying it. A person cannot experience a misemotional charge independent
of having received physical pain. Hence the term, "secondary". If someone
has the pain incident, subsequent similar incidents can be associated with it
and can restimulate the past pain. If the PC hasn't become accustomed to such
events, one way or another, he will suppress perception of the environment as
being similar to the first incident and hence unsafe. If the auditor is a
restimulator for the PC, the PC will always omit pointing at the the auditor
during havingness, until he gets sufficiently familiar with the environment
and aware of it to key out. At this point, the PC sees the auditor and
breathes a sigh of relief. [i.e. the PC finds the auditor.]

The guy who has no somatic and hence no suppressor, if asked, "Have you
ever had something happen to your stomach?" will say, "Yes -- probably has."
The one who has had a mysterious stomach somatic would say, "No!", which is a
dead giveaway of the suppressor.

A person suppresses environmental restimulators using the suppress in the
original incident. The original impulse to unmock, for instance, the car in
the original incident, is used to unmock the restimulator. Just before he was
hit by the car, he tried to unmock the car.... Crunch! It hit him anyway.
That made him lose. But that same "Crunch" later comes down to unmock the
restimulators, and the first incident appears to be unmocked. A thetan never
gives up. He has pictures of the car, unmocked, in the bank. When you run it
out, you have to run out the unmock before you get the actual incident. Doing
a touch assist, the time it takes to run out the suppressor is the time it
takes for the physical pain to turn on. If he wasn't suppressing, and if he
wasn't in such a games condition with MEST, here is what would happen: The car hits him, "Splat!" He hits a telephone pole, "Splat!" He lands on the road and gets run over by a bus, "Splat!" If he didn't feel so undignified, he would simply have said, "Splat! Splat! Splat!" and picked up the body, uninjured. The somatic would have run out instantly. But because of his not-is, the somatic stays in place. That is the source of disease, somatics, etc.

A person goes through various phases of not-is, and a person's impulse
towards not-is, if failed, can turn into an alter-is. His alter-is can turn
into a not-is, and his not-is into alter-is. So he can have a suppression
stacked with a change, and that is dub-in. Dub-in follows failed suppression,
below the level of unconsciousness Dreams are dub-ins, alter-ises of the
things you can't not-is.

When, as an auditor, you feel a bit leery about auditing somebody, you
have entered into a specialized field of suppression. Some auditors have
difficulty only with certain types of PC's. Their suppression on a particular
type of being is the prevention of a restimulator. They are afraid something
is going to appear. They are suppressing something. The result is to prevent
the PC from talking to the auditor, in thousands of guises. The PC mustn't
originate; he mustn't give up withholds, change, get acknowledged, etc. There
are zillions of variations of ways to produce this effect, including premature
ack, eval, inval, overcontrol, undercontrol, Q and A, etc., etc. All these
ways combine to produce every auditing fault.

Formerly, the only cure we had was to keep the student at it long enough
to run it out by gaining familiarity with pcs and discovering that they didn't
reveal anything which damaged him. Some, however, never did get used to it.
They took the route of suppressing pcs (about 20% . About 30% got over it
rather slowly and 50% rather easily, with varying degrees of speed.

The length of time required in training is directly proportional to the
number of suppressors you are trying to overcome in the student. They are
dealing with the root stuff of aberration. Of course there is likely to be
revealed from the PC some restimulator. In the likely event that this occurs,
these students will suppress the PC's comm.

The way to handle this requires drills and familiarization with
suppression, and finding who or what would suppress. Get these things sorted
out to clear up the mechanism.

Who is the person with the field (Black V, invisible field, etc.)? It's
the person with tremendous suppression. Blackness is difficulty of
recognition; invisibility, which is rarer, is suppression of glass objects. A
person with a black field is more likely to suppress at night than during the
day. The person who is suppressing thetans also gets an invisible field.
Whenever you suppress something in a given time-stream, you of course suppress
time, so time becomes the primary suppression, giving the instantaneousness of
all time in the reactive mind, because of the not-ising of the reactive mind.

Everybody is trying to suppress some things. Normal survival conduct
calls for suppression of counter-survival impulses. We go down from that to
suppressing things that are liable to appear, thence to suppressing things
that are likely to become known (the withhold), then suppressing things which
are likely to think (This gives lots of failures and invisible fields) and
various complications and automaticities of suppression. It is only the
person who has suppression of banks on total automatic, completely out
of his own control, who is dangerous as an auditor. He won't let a PC ever
reveal anything, so the PC gets stuck in everything he utters. If a process
works today, this auditor will drop it. He will only run processes that are
flat. The auditor will Q and A, goof, only pick up "safe" withholds and miss
all the ones that it could do the PC good to reveal, which the PC is willing
to reveal, if asked. This auditor is dangerous because missing withholds will
ARC break pcs and drive them out of scientology. The auditor doesn't intend
this; he just intends to do a good, safe job where no one gets upset or
reveals anything.

In study, if the person never lets the sense of the bulletin or tape to
come through, nothing will be revealed. Everyone, to some degree, has a
staggeringly bad memory, thanks to their overts. The person who has a lot of
overts is the last to be aware of it, because of her suppression.

A person will help another to the degree of tolerance he has for
something being revealed. This works into blackmail: "If you don't help me,
I'll reveal something about you." The reverse is to help someone unless they
are likely to reveal something. That is the bad auditor and the bad student.
This is what keeps people from employing the technology, even when they know
it.